1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Linguistics
  4. Volume 4, 2018
  5. Article

Annual Review of Linguistics

Volume 4, 2018

The Linguistics of Lying

Abstract

This review deals with the communicative act of lying from a linguistic point of view, linguistics comprising both grammar and pragmatics. Integrating findings from the philosophy of language and from psychology, I show that the potential for lying is rooted in the language system. The tasks of providing an adequate definition of lying and of distinguishing lying from other concepts of deception (such as bald-faced lying and bullshitting) can be solved when interfaces between grammar and pragmatics are taken into account and when experimental results are used to narrow down theoretical approaches. Assuming a broadly neo-Gricean background, this review focuses on four theoretical topics: the role of the truth in lying, the scalarity and imprecision of lying, the speaker's intent to deceive, and the possibility of producing deceptive implicatures. I also briefly discuss questions of lying and neuroscience, the acquisition of lying, and prosocial and cross-cultural contexts of lying.

Keyword(s): assertion, deception, implicature, lying, pragmatics, semantics
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011817-045634
2018-01-14
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/linguistics/4/1/annurev-linguistics-011817-045634.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011817-045634&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ambach W, Gamer M. 2014. Basic and Applied Research on Deception and Its Detection www.frontiersin.org: Frontiers Media
  2. Arciuli J, Mallard D, Villar G. 2010. “Um, I can tell you're lying”: linguistic markers of deception versus truth-telling in speech. Appl. Psycholinguist. 31:397–411 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arico AJ, Fallis D. 2013. Lies, damned lies, and statistics: an empirical investigation of the concept of lying. Philos. Psychol. 26:790–816 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ariel M. 2016. Revisiting the typology of pragmatic interpretations. Intercult. Pragmat. 13:1–35 [Google Scholar]
  5. Asher N, Lascarides A. 2013. Strategic communication. Semant. Pragmat. 6:1–62 [Google Scholar]
  6. Börjesson K. 2014. The Semantics–Pragmatics Controversy Berlin: de Gruyter
  7. Bok S. 1999. Lying: Moral Choices in Public and Private Life New York: Vintage
  8. Borg E. 2016. Exploding explicatures. Mind Lang 31:335–55 [Google Scholar]
  9. Borsellino C. 2013. Motivations, moral components, and detection of lying behavior to benefit self and others. Int. J. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 3:70–76 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bronston v. United States 409 U.S. 352 1973.
  11. Brown J, Cappelen H. 2011a. Assertion: New Philosophical Essays Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  12. Brown J, Cappelen H. 2011b. Assertion: an introduction and overview. In Brown & Cappelen 2011a 1–17
  13. Brown P, Levinson SC. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  14. Burton-Roberts N. 2013. On Grice and cancellation. J. Pragmat. 48:7–28 [Google Scholar]
  15. Carson TL. 2006. The definition of lying. Noûs 40:284–306 [Google Scholar]
  16. Carson TL. 2010. Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  17. Chen R. 2001. Self-politeness: a proposal. J. Pragmat. 33:87–106 [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen R, Hu C, He L. 2013. Lying between English and Chinese: an intercultural comparative study. Intercult. Pragmat. 10:375–401 [Google Scholar]
  19. Chisholm RM, Feehan TD. 1977. The intent to deceive. J. Philos. 74:143–59 [Google Scholar]
  20. Cole SAN. 1996. Semantic prototypes and the pragmatics of lie across cultures. Lacus Forum 23:475–83 [Google Scholar]
  21. Coleman L, Kay P. 1981. Prototype semantics: the English verb lie. Language 57:26–44 [Google Scholar]
  22. Coons C, Weber M. 2014. Manipulation. Theory and Practice Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  23. Danziger E. 2010. On trying and lying: cultural configurations of Grice's Maxim of Quality. Intercult. Pragmat. 7:199–219 [Google Scholar]
  24. d'Avis F. 2013. Exklamativsatz. Satztypen des Deutschen J Meibauer, M Steinbach, H Altmann 171–201 Berlin: de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  25. Decker A, Disney A, D'Elia B, Keenan JP. Lying, deception, and the brain. The Oxford Handbook of Lying J Meibauer Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press Forthcoming [Google Scholar]
  26. DePaulo BM, Lindsay JJ, Malone BE, Muhlenbruck KK, Charlton K, Cooper H. 2003. Cues to deception. Psychol. Bull. 129:74–118 [Google Scholar]
  27. Doran R, Ward G, Larson M, McNabb Y, Baker RE. 2012. A novel experimental paradigm for distinguishing between what is said and what is implicated. Language 88:124–54 [Google Scholar]
  28. Dynel M. 2011. A web of deceit: a neo-Gricean view on types of verbal deception. Int. Rev. Pragmat. 3:139–67 [Google Scholar]
  29. Dynel M. 2015. Intention to deceive, bald-faced lies, and deceptive implicature: insights into Lying at the Semantics–Pragmatics Interface. Intercult. Pragmat. 12:309–32 [Google Scholar]
  30. Dynel M. 2016. Comparing and combining covert and overt untruthfulness: on lying, deception, irony and metaphor. Pragmat. Cogn. 23:174–208 [Google Scholar]
  31. Erat S, Gneezy U. 2012. White lies. Manag. Sci. 58:723–33 [Google Scholar]
  32. Falkenberg G. 1982. Lügen. Grundzüge einer Theorie sprachlicher Täuschung. Tübingen, Ger.: Niemeyer
  33. Fallis D. 2009. What is lying?. J. Philos. 106:29–56 [Google Scholar]
  34. Fallis D. 2011. Lying and deception. Philos. Imprint 10:1–22 [Google Scholar]
  35. Fallis D. 2012. Lying as a violation of Grice's Maxim of Quality. Dialectica 66:563–81 [Google Scholar]
  36. Fallis D. 2015. Are bald-faced lies deceptive after all?. Ratio 28:81–96 [Google Scholar]
  37. Fallis D. Frankfurt wasn't bullshitting!. Southwest Philos. Stud. Forthcoming
  38. Frankfurt HG. 2005. On Bullshit Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  39. Galasiński D. 2000. The Language of Deception Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  40. Ganis G. 2015. Deception detection using neuroimaging. Detecting Deception: Current Challenges and Cognitive Approaches PA Granhag, A Vrij, B Verschuere 105–22 Chichester, UK: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  41. Ganis G. Lying and neuroscience. The Oxford Handbook of Lying J Meibauer. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press Forthcoming [Google Scholar]
  42. Goffmann E. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior New York: Doubleday
  43. Goldberg SC. 2015. Assertion: On the Philosophical Significance of Assertoric Speech Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  44. Granhag PA, Vrij A, Verschuere B. 2015. Detecting Deception: Current Challenges and Cognitive Approaches Chichester, UK: Wiley
  45. Green SP. 2007. Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White Collar Crime Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  46. Grice P. 1989a. Logic and conversation. Studies in the Way of Words P Grice 22–40 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  47. Grice P. 1989b. Further notes on logic and conversation. Studies in the Way of Words P Grice 41–57 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  48. Hancock JT, Curry LE, Goorha S, Woodworth M. 2008. On lying and being lied to: a linguistic analysis of deception in computer-mediated communication. Discourse Process 45:1–23 [Google Scholar]
  49. Hardcastle GL, Reisch GA. 2006. Bullshit and Philosophy: Guaranteed to Get Perfect Results Every Time Chicago: Open Court
  50. Hardin KJ. 2010. The Spanish notion of lie: revisiting Coleman and Kay. J. Pragmat. 42:3199–213 [Google Scholar]
  51. Horn LR. 2017. What lies beyond: untangling the web. Doing Pragmatics Interculturally: Cognitive, Philosophical, and Sociopragmatic Perspectives R Giora, M Haugh 151–74 Berlin: de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  52. Hornung M. 2016. Classifying prosocial lies. An empirical approach. Int. Rev. Pragmat. 8:219–46 [Google Scholar]
  53. Jary M. 2010. Assertion Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
  54. Keiser J. 2016. Bald-faced lies: how to make a move in a language game without making a move in a conversation. Philos. Stud. 173:461–77 [Google Scholar]
  55. Kenyon T. 2003. Cynical assertion: convention, pragmatics, and saying ‘uncle’. Am. Philos. Q. 40:241–48 [Google Scholar]
  56. Krifka M. 2002. Be brief and vague! And how Bidirectional Optimality Theory allows for verbosity and precision. Sounds and Systems: Studies in Structure and Change. A Festschrift for Theo Vennemann D Restle, D Zaefferer 439–58 Berlin: de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  57. Krukowska E. 2004. Die Lüge hat viele Namen. Zum Wortfeld des Verbs,lügen’ im Deutschen und Polnischen. Lügen und ihre Widersacher. Literarische Ästhetik der Lüge seit dem 18. Jh. Ein deutsch-polnisches Symposium H Eggert, J Golec 24–39 Würzburg, Ger.: Königshausen & Neumann [Google Scholar]
  58. Künne W. 2003. Conceptions of Truth Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  59. Lackey J. 2013. Lies and deception: an unhappy divorce. Analysis 73:236–48 [Google Scholar]
  60. Lapinski MK, Levine TR. 2000. Culture and information manipulation theory: the effects of self-construal and locus of benefit on information manipulation. Commun. Stud. 51:55–73 [Google Scholar]
  61. Lasersohn P. 1999. Pragmatic halos. Language 75:522–51 [Google Scholar]
  62. Lee K. 2013. Little liars: development of verbal deception in children. Child Dev. Perspect. 7:91–96 [Google Scholar]
  63. Leech G. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  64. Leekam S. 1991. Jokes and lies: children's understanding of intentional falsehood. Natural Theories of Mind, Evolution, Development, and Simulation of Everyday Mindreading A White 159–74 Oxford, UK: Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  65. Leland P. 2015. Rational responsibility and the assertoric character of bald-faced lies. Analysis 75:550–54 [Google Scholar]
  66. Leonard HS. 1959. Interrogatives, imperatives, truth, falsity and lies. Philos. Sci. 26:172–86 [Google Scholar]
  67. Levine EE, Schweitzer ME. 2014. Are liars ethical? On the tension between benevolence and honesty. J. Exp. Psychol. 53:107–17 [Google Scholar]
  68. Levine TR. 2014. Encyclopedia of Deception London: Sage
  69. Lohnstein H. 2016. Verum focus. The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure C Féry, S Ishihara 290–313 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  70. Mahon JE. 2015. The definition of lying and deception. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy EN Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lying-definition/ [Google Scholar]
  71. Marsili N. 2014. Lying as a scalar phenomenon: insincerity along the certainty–uncertainty continuum. Certainty–Uncertainty and the Attitudinal Space in Between S Cantarini, W Abraham, E Leiss 154–73 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
  72. Martinich A. 2010. The total content of what a speaker means. Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice K Petrus 252–67 Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  73. Mayer Lux L. 2013. Die konkludente Täuschung beim Betrug Göttingen, Ger.: V&R Unipress
  74. McGinn C. 2008. Mindfucking: A Critique of Mental Manipulation Stocksfield, UK: Acumen
  75. McKinnon R. 2015. The Norms of Assertion: Truth, Lies, and Warrant Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
  76. Meibauer J. 2005. Lying and falsely implicating. J. Pragmat. 37:1373–99 [Google Scholar]
  77. Meibauer J. 2011. On lying: intentionality, implicature, and imprecision. Intercult. Pragmat. 8:277–92 [Google Scholar]
  78. Meibauer J. 2012. Pragmatic evidence, context, and story design: an essay on recent developments in experimental pragmatics. Lang. Sci. 34:768–76 [Google Scholar]
  79. Meibauer J. 2013. Bullshit als pragmatische Kategorie. Linguist. Ber. 235:267–92 [Google Scholar]
  80. Meibauer J. 2014a. Lying at the Semantics–Pragmatics Interface Berlin: de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  81. Meibauer J. 2014b. Bald-faced lies as acts of verbal aggression. J. Lang. Aggress. Confl. 2:127–50 [Google Scholar]
  82. Meibauer J. 2014c. A truth that's told with bad intent: lying and implicit content. Belg. J. Linguist. 28:97–118 [Google Scholar]
  83. Meibauer J. 2015. Konzepte des Lügens. Z. Sprachwiss. 34:175–212 [Google Scholar]
  84. Meibauer J. 2016a. Aspects of a theory of bullshit. Pragmat. Cogn. 23:69–92 [Google Scholar]
  85. Meibauer J. 2016b. Understanding bald-faced lies: an empirical approach. Int. Rev. Pragmat. 8:247–70 [Google Scholar]
  86. Meibauer J. 2016c. Topics in the linguistics of lying: a reply to Marta Dynel. Intercult. Pragmat. 13:107–23 [Google Scholar]
  87. Meibauer J. 2017. “Western” Grice? Lying in a cross-cultural dimension. Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics I Kecskes, S Assimakopoulos 33–52 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
  88. Meibauer J. The Oxford Handbook of Lying Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press Forthcoming
  89. Michaelson E. 2016. The lying test. Mind Lang 31:470–99 [Google Scholar]
  90. Miller SA. 2012. Theory of Mind: Beyond the Preschool Years London: Routledge
  91. Newman ML, Pennebaker JW, Berry DS, Richard JM. 2003. Lying word: predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29:665–75 [Google Scholar]
  92. Newton P, Reddy V, Bull R. 2000. Children's everyday deception and performance in false-belief tasks. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 18:297–317 [Google Scholar]
  93. Posner R. 1980. Semantics and pragmatics of sentence connectives in natural language. Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics JR Searle, F Kiefer, M Bierwisch 168–203 Dordrecht, Neth.: Reidel [Google Scholar]
  94. Rutschmann R, Wiegmann A. 2017. No need for an intention to deceive: challenging the traditional definition of lying. Philos. Psychol. 30:434–53 [Google Scholar]
  95. Saul JM. 2012. Lying, Misleading, and What Is Said: An Exploration in Philosophy of Language and Ethics Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  96. Schoubye AJ, Stokke A. 2016. What is said?. Noûs 50:759–93 [Google Scholar]
  97. Searle JR. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  98. Searle JR. 1979. The logical status of fictional discourse. Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts J Searle 58–75 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  99. Seiter JS, Bruschke J, Bai C. 2002. The acceptability of deception as a function of perceiver's culture, deceiver's intention, and deceiver–deceived relationship. West. J. Commun. 66:158–80 [Google Scholar]
  100. Solan LM, Tiersma PM. 2005. Speaking of crime. The Language of Criminal Justice Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  101. Solt S. 2015. Vagueness and imprecision: empirical foundations. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 1:107–27 [Google Scholar]
  102. Sorensen R. 2007. Bald-faced lies! Lying without the intent to deceive. Pac. Philos. Q. 88:251–64 [Google Scholar]
  103. Sorensen R. 2010. Knowledge-lies. Analysis 70:608–15 [Google Scholar]
  104. Sorensen R. 2012. Lying with conditionals. Philos. Q. 62:820–32 [Google Scholar]
  105. Staffel J. 2011. Reply to Sorensen, ‘Knowledge-Lies’. Analysis 71:300–2 [Google Scholar]
  106. Stanley J. 2008. Knowledge and certainty. Philos. Issues 18:35–57 [Google Scholar]
  107. Stanley J. 2015. How Propaganda Works Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  108. Stokke A. 2013a. Lying, deceiving, and misleading. Philos. Compass 8:348–59 [Google Scholar]
  109. Stokke A. 2013b. Lying and asserting. J. Philos. CX:33–60 [Google Scholar]
  110. Stokke A. 2014. Insincerity. Noûs 48:496–520 [Google Scholar]
  111. Stokke A. 2016. Lying and misleading in discourse. Philos. Rev. 125:83–134 [Google Scholar]
  112. Talwar V. Development of lying and cognitive abilities. The Oxford Handbook of Lying J Meibauer Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press Forthcoming [Google Scholar]
  113. Talwar V, Lee K. 2008. Social and cognitive correlates of children's lying behaviour. Child Dev 97:866–81 [Google Scholar]
  114. Talwar V Murphy SM, Lee K. 2007. White lie-telling in children for politeness purposes. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 31:1–11 [Google Scholar]
  115. Terkourafi M. 2010. What-is-said from different points of view. Lang. Linguist. Compass 4:705–18 [Google Scholar]
  116. Tiersma PM, Solan LM. 2012. The language of crime. The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law PM Tiersma, LM Solan 340–53 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  117. Turri A, Turri J. 2015. The truth about lying. Cognition 138:161–68 [Google Scholar]
  118. Unger P. 1975. Ignorance Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  119. Van Swol LM. 2014. Linguistic cues. Encyclopedia of Deception 2 TR Levine 606–8 Los Angeles: Sage [Google Scholar]
  120. Van Swol LM, Braun MT, Malhotra D. 2012. Evidence for the Pinocchio effect: linguistic differences between lies, deception by omissions, and truths. Discourse Process 49:79–106 [Google Scholar]
  121. Viebahn E. 2017. Non-literal lies. Erkenntnis In press [Google Scholar]
  122. Vincent Marelli J. 2004. Words in the Way of Truth: Truthfulness, Deception, Lying Across Cultures and Disciplines Naples: Ed. Sci. Ital.
  123. Vincent Marelli J, Castelfranchi C. 1981. On the art of deception: how to lie while saying the truth. Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics: Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics H Parret, M Sbisà, J Verschueren 749–77 Amsterdam: Benjamins [Google Scholar]
  124. Vrij A. 2008. Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2nd ed..
  125. Weissman B, Terkourafi M. Are false implicatures lies? An experimental investigation. Semant. Pragmat. Forthcoming
  126. Wiegmann A, Samland J, Waldmann MR. 2016. Lying despite telling the truth. Cognition 150:37–42 [Google Scholar]
  127. Willemsen P, Wiegmann A. 2017. How the truth can make a great lie: an empirical investigation of lying by falsely implicating. Cogn. Sci. 41:in press [Google Scholar]
  128. Williams B. 2002. Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  129. Wimmer H, Perner J. 1983. Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition 13:103–28 [Google Scholar]
  130. Wimmer H, Perner J. 1985. Young children's conception of lying: moral intuition and the denotation and connotation of “to lie.”. Dev. Psychol. 21:993–95 [Google Scholar]
  131. Zimmermann TE. 2011. Model-theoretic semantics. Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning C Maienborn, K von Heusinger, P Portner 1762–802 Berlin: de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  132. Zufferey S. 2015. Acquiring Pragmatics: Social and Cognitive Perspectives London: Routledge
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011817-045634
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error