1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Linguistics
  4. Volume 8, 2022
  5. Article

Annual Review of Linguistics

Volume 8, 2022

Speech and Language Outcomes in Adults and Children with Cochlear Implants

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) represent a significant engineering and medical milestone in the treatment of hearing loss for both adults and children. In this review, we provide a brief overview of CI technology, describe the benefits that CIs can provide to adults and children who receive them, and discuss the specific limitations and issues faced by CI users. We emphasize the relevance of CIs to the linguistics community by demonstrating how CIs successfully provide access to spoken language. Furthermore, CI research can inform our basic understanding of spoken word recognition in adults and spoken language development in children. Linguistics research can also help us address the major clinical issue of outcome variability and motivate the development of new clinical tools to assess the unique challenges of adults and children with CIs, as well as novel interventions for individuals with poor outcomes.

Keyword(s): adverse conditions, cochlear implants, individual variability, language development, speech perception
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031220-011554
2022-01-14
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/linguistics/8/1/annurev-linguistics-031220-011554.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031220-011554&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Audit. Potential 2011. Minimum Speech Test Battery (MSTB) for adult cochlear implant users User Guide Audit. Potential. http://www.auditorypotential.com/MSTBfiles/MSTBManual2011-06-20%20.pdf
  2. Baddeley A, Logie R, Nimmo-Smith I., Brereton N. 1985. Components of reading fluency. J. Mem. Lang. 24:119–31
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartindale MR, Tadokoro KS, Kircher ML. 2019. Cochlear implantation in sporadic vestibular schwannoma: a systematic literature review. J. Neurol. Surg. B 80:632–39
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Başkent D, Gaudrain E, Tamati TN, Wagner A 2016. Perception and psychoacoustics of speech in cochlear implant users. Scientific Foundations of Audiology: Perspectives from Physics, Biology, Modeling, and Medicine AT Cacace, E de Kleine, AG Holt, P van Dijk 285–319 San Diego, CA: Plural
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergeson TR, Pisoni DB 2004. Audiovisual speech perception in deaf adults and children following cochlear implantation. The Handbook of Multisensory Processes GA Calvert, C Spence, BE Stein 749–72 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Beyea JA, McMullen KP, Harris MS, Houston DM, Martin JM et al. 2016. Cochlear implants in adults: effects of age and duration of deafness on speech recognition. Otol. Neurotol. 37:1238–45
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Blamey P, Artieres F, Başkent D, Bergeron F, Beynon A et al. 2013. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlingually deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiol. Neurotol. 18:36–47
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Byrd S, Shuman AG, Kileny S, Keleny PR 2011. The right not to hear: the ethics of parental refusal of hearing rehabilitation. Laryngoscope 121:1800–4
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Carlson ML. 2020. Cochlear implantation in adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 382:1531–42
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Castellanos I, Kronenberger WG, Beer J, Henning SC, Colson BG, Pisoni DB. 2014. Preschool speech intelligibility and vocabulary skills predict long-term speech and language outcomes following cochlear implantation in early childhood. Cochlear Implants Int 15:200–10
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Castellanos I, Pisoni DB, Kronenberger WG, Beer J. 2016. Early expressive language skills predict long-term neurocognitive outcomes in cochlear implant users: evidence from the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories. Am. J. Speech Lang. Pathol. 25:381–92
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cent. Medicare Medicaid Serv 2005. Medicare national coverage determination, subject: cochlear implantation transmittal 42 Publ. 100-03 Cent. Medicare Medicaid Serv., US Dep. Health Hum. Serv. Baltimore, MD:
  13. Ching TYC, Dillon H, Leigh G, Cupples L 2018. Learning from the longitudinal outcomes of children with hearing impairment (LOCHI) study: summary of 5-year findings and implications. Int. J. Audiol. 57:Suppl. 2S105–11
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Ching TYC, Dillon H, Marnane V, Hou S, Day J et al. 2013. Outcomes of early- and late-identified children at 3 years of age: findings from a prospective population-based study. Ear Hear 34:535–52
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Classon E, Rudner M, Rönnberg J. 2013. Working memory compensates for hearing related phonological processing deficit. J. Commun. Disord. 46:17–29
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Clopper CG, Pisoni DB. 2004. Perceptual dialect categorization by an adult cochlear implant user: a case study. Int. Congr. 1273:235–38
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Crouch RA. 1997. Letting the deaf be Deaf: reconsidering use of cochlear implants in prelingually deaf children. Hastings Cent. Rep. 27:14–21
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Dalbert A, Rohner P, Roosli C, Veraguth D, Huber A, Pfiffner F. 2020. Correlation between electrocochleographic changes during surgery and hearing outcome in cochlear implant recipients: a case report and systematic review of the literature. Otol. Neurotol. 41:318–26
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Davidson LS, Geers AE, Blamey PJ, Tobey E, Brenner C 2011. Factors contributing to speech perception scores in long-term pediatric CI users. Ear Hear 32:Suppl. 1S19–26
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Debruyne JA, Janssen AM, Brokx JPL. 2020. Systematic review on late cochlear implantation in early-deafened adults and adolescents: clinical effectiveness. Ear Hear 41:1417–30
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Deocampo JA, Smith GN, Kronenberger WG, Pisoni DB, Conway CM 2018. The role of statistical learning in understanding and treating spoken language outcomes in deaf children with cochlear implants. Lang. Speech Hear. Serv. Sch. 49:723–39
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Dettman S, Dowell R, Choo D, Arnott W, Abrahams Y et al. 2016. Long-term communication outcomes for children receiving cochlear implants younger than 12 months. Otol. Neurotol. 37:e82–95
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Dillon MT, Buss E, Adunka MC, King ER, Pillsbury HC et al. 2013. Long-term speech perception in elderly cochlear implant users. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 139:279–83
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Dorman MF, Liss J, Wang S, Berisha V, Ludwig C, Natale SC 2016. Experiments on auditory-visual perception of sentences by users of unilateral, bimodal, and bilateral cochlear implants. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 59:1505–19
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Fakurnejad S, Vail D, Song Y, Alyono J, Blevins NH 2020. Trends in age of cochlear implant recipients, and the impact on perioperative complication rates. Otol. Neurotol. 41:438–43
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Faulkner K, Tamati TN, Gilbert JL, Pisoni DB 2015. List equivalency for the clinical evaluation of speech recognition with PRESTO. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 26:582–94
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Finlay LMolano-Fisher 2008. ‘Transforming’ self and world: a phenomenological study of a changing lifeworld following a cochlear implant. Med. Health Care Philos. 11:255–67
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Fitzpatrick DC, Campbell A, Choudhury B, Dillon MT, Gorgues M et al. 2014. Round window electrocochleography just prior to cochlear implantation: relationship to word recognition outcomes in adults. Otol. Neurotol. 35:64–71
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Fuller CD, Gaudrain E, Clarke JN, Galvin JJ, Fu QJ et al. 2014. Gender categorization is abnormal in cochlear implant users. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 15:1037–48
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Geers AE, Brenner C, Tobey EA. 2011. Long-term outcomes of cochlear implantation in early childhood: sample characteristics and data collection methods. Ear Hear 32:Suppl. 1S2–12
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Geers AE, Hayes H. 2011. Reading, writing, and phonological processing skills of adolescents with 10 or more years of cochlear implant experience. Ear Hear 32:Suppl. 1S49–59
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Geers AE, Mitchell CM, Warner-Czyz A, Wang N-Y, Eisenberg LS. 2017. Early sign language exposure and cochlear implantation benefits. Pediatrics 140:e20163489
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Geers AE, Nicolas JG. 2013. Enduring advantages of early cochlear implantation for spoken language development. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 56:643–55
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Geers AE, Nicolas JG, Sedey AL 2003. Language skills of children with early cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 24:Suppl. 1S46–58
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Geers AE, Sedey AL. 2011. Language and verbal reasoning skills in adolescents with 10 or more years of cochlear implant experience. Ear Hear 32:Suppl. 1S39–48
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Gifford RH, Shallop JK, Peterson AM. 2008. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiol. Neurotol. 13:193–205
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Gilbert JL, Tamati TN, Pisoni DB. 2013. Development, reliability and validity of PRESTO: a new high-variability sentence recognition test. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 24:26–36
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Hall ML, Eigsti IM, Bortfeld H, Lillo-Martin D. 2018. Executive function in deaf children: auditory access and language access. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 61:1970–88
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Hall ML, Hall WC, Caselli NK. 2019. Deaf children need language, not (just) speech. First Lang. 39:367–95
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Hallberg LRM, Ringdahl A. 2004. Living with cochlear implants: experiences of 17 adult patients in Sweden. Int. J. Audiol. 43:115–21
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Hay-McCutcheon MJ, Kirk KI, Henning SC, Gao S, Qi R 2008. Using early language outcomes to predict later language ability in children with cochlear implants. Audiol. Neurotol. 13:370–78
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Hay-McCutcheon MJ, Peterson NR, Pisoni DB, Kirk KI, Yang X, Parton J 2018. Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants. J. Commun. Disord. 72:122–35
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Herman R, Pisoni DB 2000. Perception of “elliptical speech” following cochlear implantation: use of broad phonetic categories in speech perception. Volta Rev 102:321–47
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van Den Broek P. 2000. Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire. J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 123::756–65
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, Holden TA, Brenner C et al. 2013. Factors affecting open-set recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 34:342–60
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Horn DL, Davis RA, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. 2005. Development of visual attention skills in prelingually deaf children who use cochlear implants. Ear Hear 26:389–408
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Hughes SE, Hutchings HA, Rapport FL, McMahon CM, Boisvert I. 2018. Social connectedness and perceived listening effort in adult cochlear implant users: a grounded theory to establish content validity for a new patient-reported outcome measure. Ear Hear 39:922–34
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Humphries T, Kushalnagar P, Mathur G, Napoli DJ, Padden C et al. 2012. Language acquisition for deaf children: reducing the harms of zero tolerance to the use of alternative approaches. Harm Reduct. J. 9:16
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Hunter CR, Kronenberger WG, Castellanos I, Pisoni DB. 2017. Early postimplant speech perception and language skills predict long-term language and neurocognitive outcomes following pediatric cochlear implantation. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 60:2321–36
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Jackson MD, McClelland JJ 1979. Processing determinants of reading speed. J. Exp. Psychol. 108:151–81
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Ji C, Galvin JJ, Chang Y, Xu A, Fu Q-J. 2014. Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 57:532–54
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Johnsrude IS, Mackey A, Hakyemez H, Alexander E, Trang HP, Carlyon RP 2013. Swinging at a cocktail party: Voice familiarity aids speech perception in the presence of a competing voice. Psychol. Sci. 24:1995–2004
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Kaandorp MW, De Groot AMB, Festen JM, Smits C, Goverts ST. 2016. The influence of lexical-access ability and vocabulary knowledge on measures of speech recognition in noise. Int. J. Audiol. 55:157–67
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Kapolowicz MR, Montazeri V, Assmann PF. 2018. Perceiving foreign-accented speech with decreased spectral resolution in single- and multiple-talker conditions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Express Lett. 143:EL99–104
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Kapolowicz MR, Montazeri V, Baese-Berk MM, Zeng F-G, Assmann PF 2020. Rapid adaptation to non-native speech is impaired in cochlear implant users. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Express Lett. 148:EL267–72
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Kirk K, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. 2000. Lexical discrimination by children with cochlear implants: effects of age at implantation and communication mode. Cochlear Implants, eds. SB Waltzman, N Cohen 252–54 New York: Thieme
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Konishi M. 1985. Birdsong: from behavior to neuron. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 8:125–70
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Kornak J. 2019. FDA approves cochlear implants for single-sided deafness. ASHAWire Leader Live Blog Aug. 22
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Kral A, Kronenberger WG, Pisoni DB, O'Donoghue GM. 2016. Neurocognitive factors in the sensory restoration of early deafness: a connectome model. Lancet Neurol. 15:610–21
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Kral A, Sharma A. 2012. Developmental neuroplasticity after cochlear implantation. Trends Neurosci 35:111–22
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Kronenberger WG, Pisoni DB. 2019. Assessing higher order language processing in long-term cochlear implant users. . Am. J. Speech Lang. Pathol. 28:1537–53
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Kronenberger WG, Xu H, Pisoni DB. 2020. Longitudinal development of executive functioning and spoken language skills in preschool-aged children with cochlear implants. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 63:1128–47
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Lazard DS, Giraud AL, Gnansia D, Meyer B, Sterkers O 2012. Understanding the deafened brain: implications for cochlear implant rehabilitation. Eur. Ann. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Dis. 129:98–103
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Leigh JR, Dettman SJ, Dowell RC. 2016. Evidence-based guidelines for recommending cochlear implantation for young children: audiological criteria and optimizing age at implantation. Int. J. Audiol. 55:Suppl. 2S9–18
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Liu S, Del Rio E, Bradlow AR, Zeng F-G. 2004. Clear speech perception in acoustic and electric hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116:2374–83
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Luria AR. 1973. The Working Brain: An Introduction to Neuropsychology New York: Basic
  67. Luxford WMAd Hoc Subcomm. Comm. Hear. Equilib. Am. Acad. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2001. Minimum speech test battery for postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 124:125–26
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Lyxell B, Andersson J, Andersson U, Arlinger S, Bredberg G, Harder H. 1998. Phonological representation and speech understanding with cochlear implants in deafened adults. Scand. J. Psychol. 39:175–79
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Mäki-Torkko EM, Vestergren S, Harder H, Lyxell B. 2015. From isolation and dependence to autonomy expectations before and experiences after cochlear implantation in adult cochlear implant users and their significant others. Disabil. Rehabil. 37:541–47
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Marler P, Peters S. 1987. A sensitive period for song acquisition in the song sparrow, Melospiza melodia: a case of age-limited learning. Ethology 76:89–100
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Mattys S, Davis MH, Bradlow AR, Scott SK. 2012. Speech recognition in adverse listening conditions: a review. Lang. Cogn. Process. 2:953–78
     [Google Scholar]
  72. McDonald C, Kirk KI, Krueger T, Houston D. 2003. Talker discrimination and spoken word recognition by adults with cochlear implants Poster presented at 26th Midwinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology St. Petersburg, FL:
  73. McRackan TR, Bauschard M, Hatch JL, Franko-Tobin E, Droghini HR et al. 2018. Meta-analysis of quality-of-life improvement after cochlear implantation and associations with speech recognition abilities. Laryngoscope 128:982–90
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Mitchell RE, Karchmer MA. 2004. When parents are deaf versus hard of hearing: patterns of sign use and school placement of deaf and hard-of-hearing children. J Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ. 9:133–52
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Moberly AC, Harris MS, Boyce L, Nittrouer S 2017. Speech recognition in adults with cochlear implants: the effects of working memory, phonological sensitivity, and aging. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 60:1046–61
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Moberly AC, Lowenstein JH, Nittrouer S. 2016. Word recognition variability with cochlear implants: the degradation of phonemic sensitivity. Otol. Neurotol. 37:470–77
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Monroy C, Shafto C, Castellanos I, Bergeson T, Houston D. 2019. Visual habituation in deaf and hearing infants. PLOS ONE 14:e0209265
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Montag JL, AuBuchon AM, Pisoni DB, Kronenberger WG. 2014. Speech intelligibility in deaf children after long-term cochlear implant use. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 57:2332–43
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Napoli DJ, Mellon NK, Niparko JK, Rathmann C, Mathur G et al. 2015. Should all deaf children learn sign language?. Pediatrics 136:170–76
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Nauta WJH 1964. Discussion of retardation and facilitation in learning by stimulation of frontal cortex in monkeys. The Frontal Granular Cortex and Behavior JM Warren, K Akert 125–54 New York: McGraw-Hill
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Nilsson MJ, Soli SD, Gelnett DJ. 1994. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95:1085–99
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Niparko JK, Tobey EA, Thal DJ, Eisenberg LS, Wang N-Y et al. 2010. Spoken language development in children following cochlear implantation. JAMA 303:1498–506
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Nittrouer S, Muir M, Tietgens K, Moberly AC, Lowenstein JH. 2018. Development of phonological, lexical, and syntactic abilities in children with cochlear implants across the elementary grades. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 61:2561–77
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Nittrouer S, Sansom E, Low K, Rice C, Caldwell-Tarr A 2014. Language structures used by kindergartners with cochlear implants: relationship to phonological awareness, lexical knowledge and hearing loss. Ear Hear 35:506–18
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Nusbaum HC, Magnuson JS 1997. Talker normalization: phonetic constancy as a cognitive process. Talker Variability in Speech Processing K Johnson, JW Mullennix 109–32 San Diego, CA: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Nygaard LC, Pisoni DB. 1998. Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Percept. Psychophys. 60:355–76
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Nygaard LC, Sommers MS, Pisoni DB. 1994. Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychol. Sci. 5:42–46
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Pals C, Sarampalis A, Başkent D. 2013. Listening effort with cochlear implant simulations. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 56:1075–84
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Pals C, Sarampalis A, Beynon A, Stainsby T, Başkent D. 2020. Effect of spectral channels on speech recognition, comprehension, and listening effort in cochlear-implant users. Trends Hear 24:2331216520904617
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Peterson GE, Lehiste I. 1962. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Disord. 27:62–70
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Pichora-Fuller MK. 2016. How social psychological factors may modulate auditory and cognitive functioning during listening. Ear Hear 37:Suppl. 1S92–100
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Pisoni DB 1997. Some thoughts on “normalization” in speech perception. Talker Variability in Speech Processing K Johnson, JW Mullennix 9–32 San Diego, CA: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Pisoni DB, Cleary M. 2003. Measures of working memory span and verbal rehearsal speed in deaf children after cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 24:Suppl. 1S106–20
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Pisoni DB, Kronenberger WG, Harris MS, Moberly AC 2018. Three challenges for future research on cochlear implants. World J. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 3:240–54
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Pisoni DB, Kronenberger WG, Roman AS, Geers AE 2011. Measures of digit span and verbal rehearsal speed in deaf children following more than 10 years of cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 32:Suppl. 1S60–74
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Reynell J, Gruber C. 1990. Reynell Developmental Language Scales. Los Angeles: West. Psychol. Serv., US ed..
  97. Reynell J, Huntley M. 1985. Reynell Development Language Scales Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson, 2nd revis..
  98. Rönnberg J, Danielsson H, Rudner M, Arlinger S, Sternäng O et al. 2011. Hearing loss is negatively related to episodic and semantic long-term memory but not to short-term memory. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 54:705–26
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Rönnberg J, Holmer E, Rudner M 2019. Cognitive hearing science and ease of language understanding. Int. J. Audiol. 58:247–61
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Rönnberg J, Lunner T, Zekveld A, Sörqvist P, Danielsson H et al. 2013. The ease of language understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 7:31
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Rudner M, Foo C, Sundewall-Thorén E, Lunner T, Rönnberg J 2008. Phonological mismatch and explicit cognitive processing in a sample of 102 hearing-aid users. Int. J. Audiol. 47:Suppl. 2S91–98
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Ruffin CV, Kronenberger WG, Colson BG, Henning SC, Pisoni DB. 2013. Long-term speech and language outcomes in prelingually deaf children, adolescents and young adults who received cochlear implants in childhood. Audiol. Neurotol. 18:289–96
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Pfingst BE. 2018. Assessing the relationship between the electrically evoked compound action potential and speech recognition abilities in bilateral cochlear implant recipients. Ear Hear 39:344–58
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Semel E, Wiig EH, Secord WA. 2003. Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals—Fourth Edition (CELF-4) Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assess.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Shearer AE, Hansen MR. 2019. Auditory synaptopathy, auditory neuropathy, and cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope Investig. Otolaryngol. 4:429–40
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Sladen DP, Gifford RH, Haynes D, Kelsall D, Benson A. et al. 2017. Evaluation of a revised indication for determining adult cochlear implant candidacy. Laryngoscope 127:2368–74
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Sommers MS, Hale S, Myerson J, Rose N, Tye-Murray N, Spehar B. 2011. Listening comprehension across the adult lifespan. Ear Hear 32:775–81
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Sommers MS, Kirk KI, Pisoni DB. 1997. Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I. The effects of response format. Ear Hear 18:89–99
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Souza P, Arehart K, Miller CW, Muralimanohar RK. 2011. Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing. Ear Hear 32:75–83
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Spahr AJ, Dorman MF, Litvak LM, Van Wie S, Gifford RH et al. 2012. Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists. Ear Hear 33:112–17
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Sparrow R. 2005. Defending deaf culture: the case of cochlear implants. J. Political Philos. 13:135–52
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Spencer LJ, Gantz BJ, Knutson JF. 2004. Outcomes and achievements of students who grew up with access to cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 114:1576–81
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Tamati TN, Gilbert JL, Pisoni DB 2013. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 24:616–34
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Tamati TN, Gilbert JL, Pisoni DB 2014. Influence of early linguistic experience on dialect categorization by an adult cochlear implant user: a case study. Ear Hear 34:383–86
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Tamati TN, Pisoni DB. 2014. Non-native speech recognition in high-variability listening conditions using PRESTO. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 25:869–92
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Tamati TN, Ray C, Vasil KJ, Pisoni DB, Moberly AC. 2020. High- and low-performing adult cochlear implant users on high-variability sentence recognition: differences in auditory spectral resolution and neurocognitive functioning. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 31:324–35
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Tamati TN, Vasil KJ, Kronenberger WG, Pisoni DB, Moberly AC, Ray C. 2021. Word and nonword reading efficiency in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users. Otol. Neurotol. 42:e272–78
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Teagle HF, Park LR, Brown KD, Zdanski C, Pillsbury HC. 2019. Pediatric cochlear implantation: a quarter century in review. Cochlear Implants Int 20:288–98
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Torgesen JK, Wagner RK, Rashotte CA. 2012. Test of Word Reading Efficiency Austin, TX: Pro-Ed., 2nd ed..
  120. Tucker BP. 1998. Deaf culture, cochlear implants, and elective disability. Hastings Cent. Rep. 28:6–14
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Tye-Murray N, Sommers M, Spehar B, Myerson J, Hale S, Rose NS 2008. Auditory-visual discourse comprehension by older and young adults in favorable and unfavorable conditions. Int. J. Audiol. 47:Suppl. 2S31–37
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Uhler K, Warner-Czyz A, Gifford RPMSTB Work. Group 2017. Pediatric minimum speech test battery. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 28:232–47
     [Google Scholar]
  123. UK Cochlear Implant Study Group 2004. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults. II: Cost-effectiveness analysis. Ear Hear. 25:336–40
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Williamson RA, Pytynia K, Oghalai JS, Vrabec JT. 2009. Auditory performance after cochlear implantation in late septuagenarians and octogenarians. Otol. Neurotol. 30:916–20
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Wilson BS, Dorman MF. 2008. Cochlear implants: current designs and future possibilities. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 45:695–730
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Wilson BS, Dorman MF, Woldorff MG, Tucci DL. 2011. Cochlear implants: matching the prosthesis to the brain and facilitating desired plastic changes in brain function. Prog. Brain Res. 194:117–29
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Winn MB, Edwards JR, Litovsky RY. 2015. The impact of auditory spectral resolution on listening effort revealed by pupil dilation. Ear Hear 36:e153–65
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Zeng F-G, Rebscher S, Harrison W, Sun X, Feng H. 2008. Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1:115–42
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031220-011554
Loading
Speech and Language Outcomes in Adults and Children with Cochlear Implants
Annual Review of Linguistics 8, 299 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031220-011554
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031220-011554
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031220-011554
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error