What Is Metagenomics Teaching Us, and What Is Missed?

Literature Cited

1. 1. 

   Albanese D, Donati C. 2017. Strain profiling and epidemiology of bacterial species from metagenomic sequencing. Nat. Commun. 8:12260
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2. 

   Alneberg J, Bjarnason BS, de Bruijn I, Schirmer M, Quick J et al. 2014. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat. Methods 11:111144–46
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3. 

   Arevalo P, VanInsberghe D, Elsherbini J, Gore J, Polz MF 2019. A reverse ecology approach based on a biological definition of microbial populations. Cell 178:4820–34.e14
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4. 

   Ayling M, Clark MD, Leggett RM 2019. New approaches for metagenome assembly with short reads. Brief. Bioinform. 21:2584–94
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5. 

   Beaulaurier J, Zhu S, Deikus G, Mogno I, Zhang X-S et al. 2018. Metagenomic binning and association of plasmids with bacterial host genomes using DNA methylation. Nat. Biotechnol. 36:161–69
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6. 

   Berger B, Peng J, Singh M 2013. Computational solutions for omics data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14:5333–46
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7. 

   Bersanelli M, Mosca E, Remondini D, Giampieri E, Sala C et al. 2016. Methods for the integration of multi-omics data: mathematical aspects. BMC Bioinform 17:Suppl. 215
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8. 

   Bertrand D, Shaw J, Kalathiyappan M, Ng AHQ, Kumar MS et al. 2019. Hybrid metagenomic assembly enables high-resolution analysis of resistance determinants and mobile elements in human microbiomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 37:8937–44
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9. 

   Bishara A, Moss EL, Kolmogorov M, Parada AE, Weng Z et al. 2018. High-quality genome sequences of uncultured microbes by assembly of read clouds. Nat. Biotechnol. 36:111067–80
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10. 

    Blin K, Shaw S, Steinke K, Villebro R, Ziemert N et al. 2019. antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W1W81–87
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11. 

    Boisvert S, Raymond F, Godzaridis É, Laviolette F, Corbeil J 2012. Ray Meta: scalable de novo metagenome assembly and profiling. Genome Biol 13:12R122
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12. 

    Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC et al. 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37:8852–57
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13. 

    Bonder MJ, Kurilshikov A, Tigchelaar EF, Mujagic Z, Imhann F et al. 2016. The effect of host genetics on the gut microbiome. Nat. Genet. 48:111407–12
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14. 

    Bowers RM, Kyrpides NC, Stepanauskas R, Harmon-Smith M, Doud D et al. 2017. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat. Biotechnol. 35:8725–31
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15. 

    Brady SF. 2007. Construction of soil environmental DNA cosmid libraries and screening for clones that produce biologically active small molecules. Nat. Protoc. 2:51297–305
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16. 

    Breitbart M, Hewson I, Felts B, Mahaffy JM, Nulton J et al. 2003. Metagenomic analyses of an uncultured viral community from human feces. J. Bacteriol. 185:206220–23
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17. 

    Breitbart M, Salamon P, Andresen B, Mahaffy JM, Segall AM et al. 2002. Genomic analysis of uncultured marine viral communities. PNAS 99:2214250–55
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18. 

    Brito IL, Gurry T, Zhao S, Huang K, Young SK et al. 2019. Transmission of human-associated microbiota along family and social networks. Nat. Microbiol. 4:6964–71
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19. 

    Brito IL, Yilmaz S, Huang K, Xu L, Jupiter SD et al. 2016. Mobile genes in the human microbiome are structured from global to individual scales. Nature 535:7612435–39
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20. 

    Brown CT, Olm MR, Thomas BC, Banfield JF 2016. Measurement of bacterial replication rates in microbial communities. Nat. Biotechnol. 34:121256–63
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21. 

    Browne HP, Forster SC, Anonye BO, Kumar N, Neville BA et al. 2016. Culturing of ‘unculturable’ human microbiota reveals novel taxa and extensive sporulation. Nature 533:7604543–46
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22. 

    Burstein D, Harrington LB, Strutt SC, Probst AJ, Anantharaman K et al. 2017. New CRISPR-Cas systems from uncultivated microbes. Nature 542:7640237–41
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23. 

    Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Holmes SP 2017. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. ISME J 11:122639–43
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24. 

    Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP 2016. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13:7581–83
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25. 

    Castillo Villamizar GA, Nacke H, Boehning M, Herz K, Daniel R 2019. Functional metagenomics reveals an overlooked diversity and novel features of soil-derived bacterial phosphatases and phytases. mBio 10:1e01966–18
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26. 

    Chang F-Y, Brady SF. 2013. Discovery of indolotryptoline antiproliferative agents by homology-guided metagenomic screening. PNAS 110:72478
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27. 

    Chaudhary N, Gupta A, Gupta S, Sharma VK 2017. BioFuelDB: a database and prediction server of enzymes involved in biofuels production. PeerJ 5:e3497
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28. 

    Cleary B, Brito IL, Huang K, Gevers D, Shea T et al. 2015. Detection of low-abundance bacterial strains in metagenomic datasets by eigengenome partitioning. Nat. Biotechnol. 33:101053–60
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29. 

    Coutinho FH, Silveira CB, Gregoracci GB, Thompson CC, Edwards RA et al. 2017. Marine viruses discovered via metagenomics shed light on viral strategies throughout the oceans. Nat. Commun. 8:115955
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30. 

    Devoto AE, Santini JM, Olm MR, Anantharaman K, Munk P et al. 2019. Megaphages infect Prevotella and variants are widespread in gut microbiomes. Nat. Microbiol. 4:4693–700
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31. 

    Duerkop BA, Kleiner M, Paez-Espino D, Zhu W, Bushnell B et al. 2018. Murine colitis reveals a disease-associated bacteriophage community. Nat. Microbiol. 3:91023–31
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32. 

    Dunphy CM, Gouhier TC, Chu ND, Vollmer SV 2019. Structure and stability of the coral microbiome in space and time. Sci. Rep. 9:16785
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33. 

    Durrant MG, Li MM, Siranosian BA, Montgomery SB, Bhatt AS 2020. A bioinformatic analysis of integrative mobile genetic elements highlights their role in bacterial adaptation. Cell Host Microbe 27:1140–53.e9
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34. 

    Dutilh BE, Cassman N, McNair K, Sanchez SE, Silva GGZ et al. 2014. A highly abundant bacteriophage discovered in the unknown sequences of human faecal metagenomes. Nat. Commun. 5:14498
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35. 

    Edgar RC. 2016. UCHIME2: improved chimera prediction for amplicon sequencing. bioRxiv 074252
36. 36. 

    Eren AM, Esen ÖC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG et al. 2015. Anvi'o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ’omics data. PeerJ 3:e1319
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37. 

    Faust K, Sathirapongsasuti JF, Izard J, Segata N, Gevers D et al. 2012. Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome. PLOS Comput. Biol. 8:7e1002606
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38. 

    Ferretti P, Farina S, Cristofolini M, Girolomoni G, Tett A, Segata N 2017. Experimental metagenomics and ribosomal profiling of the human skin microbiome. Exp. Dermatol. 26:3211–19
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39. 

    Ferretti P, Pasolli E, Tett A, Asnicar F, Gorfer V et al. 2018. Mother-to-infant microbial transmission from different body sites shapes the developing infant gut microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 24:1133–145.e5
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40. 

    Finn RD, Bateman A, Clements J, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY et al. 2014. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D1D222–30
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41. 

    Fouts DE. 2006. Phage_Finder: automated identification and classification of prophage regions in complete bacterial genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 34:205839–51
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42. 

    Franzosa EA, McIver LJ, Rahnavard G, Thompson LR, Schirmer M et al. 2018. Species-level functional profiling of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. Nat. Methods 15:11962–68
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43. 

    Friedman J, Alm EJ. 2012. Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLOS Comput. Biol. 8:9e1002687
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44. 

    Garud NR, Good BH, Hallatschek O, Pollard KS 2019. Evolutionary dynamics of bacteria in the gut microbiome within and across hosts. PLOS Biol 17:1e3000102
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45. 

    Goltsman DSA, Sun CL, Proctor DM, DiGiulio DB, Robaczewska A et al. 2018. Metagenomic analysis with strain-level resolution reveals fine-scale variation in the human pregnancy microbiome. Genome Res 28:101467–80
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46. 

    Greenblum S, Carr R, Borenstein E 2015. Extensive strain-level copy-number variation across human gut microbiome species. Cell 160:4583–94
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47. 

    Grottoli AG, Dalcin Martins P, Wilkins MJ, Johnston MD, Warner ME et al. 2018. Coral physiology and microbiome dynamics under combined warming and ocean acidification. PLOS ONE 13:1e0191156
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48. 

    Guerin E, Shkoporov A, Stockdale SR, Gonzalez-Tortuero E, Ross RP, Hill C 2018. Biology and taxonomy of crAss-like bacteriophages, the most abundant virus in the human gut. Cell Host Microbe 24:653–64
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49. 

    Haft DH, Selengut JD, White O 2003. The TIGRFAMs database of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res 31:1371–73
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50. 

    Hillmann B, Al-Ghalith GA, Shields-Cutler RR, Zhu Q, Gohl DM et al. 2018. Evaluating the information content of shallow shotgun metagenomics. mSystems 3:6e00069–18
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51. 

    Hum. Microbiome Proj. Consort. Huttenhower C, Gevers D, Knight R, Abubucker S et al. 2012. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486:7402207–14
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52. 

    Huson DH, Auch AF, Qi J, Schuster SC 2007. MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data. Genome Res 17:3377–86
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53. 

    Imelfort M, Parks D, Woodcroft BJ, Dennis P, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW 2014. GroopM: an automated tool for the recovery of population genomes from related metagenomes. PeerJ 2:e603
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54. 

    Joice R, Yasuda K, Shafquat A, Morgan XC, Huttenhower C 2014. Determining microbial products and identifying molecular targets in the human microbiome. Cell Metab 20:5731–41
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55. 

    Jump. Consort. Hum. Microbiome Proj. Data Gener. Work. Group 2012. Evaluation of 16S rDNA-based community profiling for human microbiome research. PLOS ONE 7:6e39315
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56. 

    Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M 2016. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D1D457–62
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57. 

    Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R et al. 2019. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7:e7359
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58. 

    Karp PD, Riley M, Paley SM, Pellegrini-Toole A 2002. The MetaCyc database. Nucleic Acids Res 30:159–61
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59. 

    Kim D, Song L, Breitwieser FP, Salzberg SL 2016. Centrifuge: rapid and sensitive classification of metagenomic sequences. Genome Res 26:121721–29
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60. 

    Korem T, Zeevi D, Suez J, Weinberger A, Avnit-Sagi T et al. 2015. Growth dynamics of gut microbiota in health and disease inferred from single metagenomic samples. Science 349:62521101–6
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61. 

    Kundu P, Manna B, Majumder S, Ghosh A 2019. Species-wide metabolic interaction network for understanding natural lignocellulose digestion in termite gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 9:116329
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62. 

    Kurokawa K, Itoh T, Kuwahara T, Oshima K, Toh H et al. 2007. Comparative metagenomics revealed commonly enriched gene sets in human gut microbiomes. DNA Res 14:4169–81
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63. 

    Kurtz ZD, Müller CL, Miraldi ER, Littman DR, Blaser MJ, Bonneau RA 2015. Sparse and compositionally robust inference of microbial ecological networks. PLOS Comput. Biol. 11:5e1004226
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64. 

    Labonté JM, Field EK, Lau M, Chivian D, Van Heerden E et al. 2015. Single cell genomics indicates horizontal gene transfer and viral infections in a deep subsurface Firmicutes population. Front. Microbiol. 6:349
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65. 

    Lagier J-C, Dubourg G, Million M, Cadoret F, Bilen M et al. 2018. Culturing the human microbiota and culturomics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16:9540–50
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66. 

    Li D, Liu C-M, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam T-W 2015. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31:101674–76
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67. 

    Li SS, Zhu A, Benes V, Costea PI, Hercog R et al. 2016. Durable coexistence of donor and recipient strains after fecal microbiota transplantation. Science 352:6285586–89
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68. 

    Lim ES, Zhou Y, Zhao G, Bauer IK, Droit L et al. 2015. Early life dynamics of the human gut virome and bacterial microbiome in infants. Nat. Med. 21:101228–34
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69. 

    Lloyd-Price J, Arze C, Ananthakrishnan AN, Schirmer M, Avila-Pacheco J et al. 2019. Multi-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases. Nature 569:7758655–62
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70. 

    Lloyd-Price J, Mahurkar A, Rahnavard G, Crabtree J, Orvis J et al. 2017. Strains, functions and dynamics in the expanded Human Microbiome Project. Nature 550:767461–66
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71. 

    Magnúsdóttir S, Heinken A, Kutt L, Ravcheev DA, Bauer E et al. 2017. Generation of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions for 773 members of the human gut microbiota. Nat. Biotechnol. 35:181–89
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72. 

    Maini Rekdal V, Bess EN, Bisanz JE, Turnbaugh PJ, Balskus EP 2019. Discovery and inhibition of an interspecies gut bacterial pathway for Levodopa metabolism. Science 364:6445eaau6323
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73. 

    Mallick H, Franzosa EA, Mclver LJ, Banerjee S, Sirota-Madi A et al. 2019. Predictive metabolomic profiling of microbial communities using amplicon or metagenomic sequences. Nat. Commun. 10:13136
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74. 

    Marotz CA, Sanders JG, Zuniga C, Zaramela LS, Knight R, Zengler K 2018. Improving saliva shotgun metagenomics by chemical host DNA depletion. Microbiome 6:142
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75. 

    Mikheenko A, Saveliev V, Gurevich A 2016. MetaQUAST: evaluation of metagenome assemblies. Bioinformatics 32:71088–90
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76. 

    Mizuno CM, Rodriguez-Valera F, Kimes NE, Ghai R 2013. Expanding the marine virosphere using metagenomics. PLOS Genet 9:12e1003987
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77. 

    Nayfach S, Shi ZJ, Seshadri R, Pollard KS, Kyrpides NC 2019. New insights from uncultivated genomes of the global human gut microbiome. Nature 568:7753505–10
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78. 

    Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA 2017. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res 27:5824–34
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79. 

    Oh J, Byrd AL, Deming C, Conlan S, NISC Comp. Seq. Program, et al. 2014. Biogeography and individuality shape function in the human skin metagenome. Nature 514:752059–64
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80. 

    Olm MR, West PT, Brooks B, Firek BA, Baker R et al. 2019. Genome-resolved metagenomics of eukaryotic populations during early colonization of premature infants and in hospital rooms. Microbiome 7:126
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81. 

    Orellana LH, Chee-Sanford JC, Sanford RA, Löffler FE, Konstantinidis KT 2018. Year-round shotgun metagenomes reveal stable microbial communities in agricultural soils and novel ammonia oxidizers responding to fertilization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84:2e01646–17
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82. 

    Pachiadaki MG, Brown JM, Brown J, Bezuidt O, Berube PM et al. 2019. Charting the complexity of the marine microbiome through single-cell genomics. Cell 179:71623–35.e11
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83. 

    Parasar B, Zhou H, Xiao X, Shi Q, Brito IL, Chang PV 2019. Chemoproteomic profiling of gut microbiota-associated bile salt hydrolase activity. ACS Cent. Sci. 5:5867–73
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84. 

    Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:71043–55
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85. 

    Pasolli E, Asnicar F, Manara S, Zolfo M, Karcher N et al. 2019. Extensive unexplored human microbiome diversity revealed by over 150,000 genomes from metagenomes spanning age, geography, and lifestyle. Cell 176:3649–62.e20
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86. 

    Peng Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, Chin FYL 2012. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics 28:111420–28
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87. 

    Pepe-Ranney C, Campbell AN, Koechli CN, Berthrong S, Buckley DH 2016. Unearthing the ecology of soil microorganisms using a high resolution DNA-SIP approach to explore cellulose and xylose metabolism in soil. Front. Microbiol. 7:703
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88. 

    Porras AM, Brito IL. 2019. The internationalization of human microbiome research. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 50:50–55
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89. 

    Poyet M, Groussin M, Gibbons SM, Avila-Pacheco J, Jiang X et al. 2019. A library of human gut bacterial isolates paired with longitudinal multiomics data enables mechanistic microbiome research. Nat. Med. 25:91442–52
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90. 

    Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J et al. 2012. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 490:741855–60
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91. 

    Riva A, Kuzyk O, Forsberg E, Siuzdak G, Pfann C et al. 2019. A fiber-deprived diet disturbs the fine-scale spatial architecture of the murine colon microbiome. Nat. Commun. 10:14366
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92. 

    Roux S, Enault F, Hurwitz BL, Sullivan MB 2015. VirSorter: mining viral signal from microbial genomic data. PeerJ 3:e985
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93. 

    Sarhan MS, Hamza MA, Youssef HH, Patz S, Becker M et al. 2019. Culturomics of the plant prokaryotic microbiome and the dawn of plant-based culture media—a review. J. Adv. Res. 19:15–27
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94. 

    Sberro H, Fremin BJ, Zlitni S, Edfors F, Greenfield N et al. 2019. Large-scale analyses of human microbiomes reveal thousands of small, novel genes. Cell 178:51245–59.e14
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95. 

    Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M et al. 2009. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:237537–41
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96. 

    Sczyrba A, Hofmann P, Belmann P, Koslicki D, Janssen S et al. 2017. Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation—a benchmark of metagenomics software. Nat. Methods 14:111063–71
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97. 

    Sheth RU, Li M, Jiang W, Sims PA, Leong KW, Wang HH 2019. Spatial metagenomic characterization of microbial biogeography in the gut. Nat. Biotechnol. 37:8877–83
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98. 

    Shi H, Zipfel W, Brito I, De Vlaminck I 2019. Highly multiplexed spatial mapping of microbial communities. bioRxiv 678672
99. 99. 

    Sieber CMK, Probst AJ, Sharrar A, Thomas BC, Hess M et al. 2018. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat. Microbiol. 3:7836–43
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100. 

     Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM 2015. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31:193210–12
     [Google Scholar]
101. 101. 

     Simpson JT, Wong K, Jackman SD, Schein JE, Jones SJM, Birol I 2009. ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res 19:61117–23
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102. 

     Smillie CS, Sauk J, Gevers D, Friedman J, Sung J et al. 2018. Strain tracking reveals the determinants of bacterial engraftment in the human gut following fecal microbiota transplantation. Cell Host Microbe 23:2229–40.e5
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103. 

     Smillie CS, Smith MB, Friedman J, Cordero OX, David LA, Alm EJ 2011. Ecology drives a global network of gene exchange connecting the human microbiome. Nature 480:7376241–44
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104. 

     Söllinger A, Tveit AT, Poulsen M, Noel SJ, Bengtsson M et al. 2018. Holistic assessment of rumen microbiome dynamics through quantitative metatranscriptomics reveals multifunctional redundancy during key steps of anaerobic feed degradation. mSystems 3:4e00038–18
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105. 

     Sommer MOA, Dantas G, Church GM 2009. Functional characterization of the antibiotic resistance reservoir in the human microflora. Science 325:59441128–31
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106. 

     Song W, Wemheuer B, Zhang S, Steensen K, Thomas T MetaCHIP: community-level horizontal gene transfer identification through the combination of best-match and phylogenetic approaches. Microbiome 7:136
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107. 

     Song W-Z, Thomas T. 2017. Binning_refiner: improving genome bins through the combination of different binning programs. Bioinformatics 33:121873–75
     [Google Scholar]
108. 108. 

     Stalder T, Press MO, Sullivan S, Liachko I, Top EM 2019. Linking the resistome and plasmidome to the microbiome. ISME J 13:102437–46
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109. 

     Su J-Q, An X-L, Li B, Chen Q-L, Gillings MR et al. 2017. Metagenomics of urban sewage identifies an extensively shared antibiotic resistome in China. Microbiome 5:184
     [Google Scholar]
110. 110. 

     Sugimoto Y, Camacho FR, Wang S, Chankhamjon P, Odabas A et al. 2019. A metagenomic strategy for harnessing the chemical repertoire of the human microbiome. Science 366:6471eaax9176
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111. 

     Sunagawa S, Coelho LP, Chaffron S, Kultima JR, Labadie K et al. 2015. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science 348:62371261359
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112. 

     Sunagawa S, Mende DR, Zeller G, Izquierdo-Carrasco F, Berger SA et al. 2013. Metagenomic species profiling using universal phylogenetic marker genes. Nat. Methods 10:121196–99
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113. 

     Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV 2000. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 28:133–36
     [Google Scholar]
114. 114. 

     Thomas AM, Manghi P, Asnicar F, Pasolli E, Armanini F et al. 2019. Metagenomic analysis of colorectal cancer datasets identifies cross-cohort microbial diagnostic signatures and a link with choline degradation. Nat. Med. 25:4667–78
     [Google Scholar]
115. 115. 

     Truong DT, Tett A, Pasolli E, Huttenhower C, Segata N 2017. Microbial strain-level population structure and genetic diversity from metagenomes. Genome Res 27:4626–38
     [Google Scholar]
116. 116. 

     Uritskiy GV, DiRuggiero J, Taylor J 2018. MetaWRAP—a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis. Microbiome 6:1158
     [Google Scholar]
117. 117. 

     Vandeputte D, Kathagen G, D'hoe K, Vieira-Silva S, Valles-Colomer M et al. 2017. Quantitative microbiome profiling links gut community variation to microbial load. Nature 551:7681507–11
     [Google Scholar]
118. 118. 

     Vatanen T, Franzosa EA, Schwager R, Tripathi S, Arthur TD et al. 2018. The human gut microbiome in early-onset type 1 diabetes from the TEDDY study. Nature 562:7728589–94
     [Google Scholar]
119. 119. 

     Visconti A, Le Roy CI, Rosa F, Rossi N, Martin TC et al. 2019. Interplay between the human gut microbiome and host metabolism. Nat. Commun. 10:14505
     [Google Scholar]
120. 120. 

     Weissbrod O, Rothschild D, Barkan E, Segal E 2018. Host genetics and microbiome associations through the lens of genome wide association studies. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 44:9–19
     [Google Scholar]
121. 121. 

     Welch JLM, Hasegawa Y, McNulty NP, Gordon JI, Borisy GG 2017. Spatial organization of a model 15-member human gut microbiota established in gnotobiotic mice. PNAS 114:43E9105–14
     [Google Scholar]
122. 122. 

     Welch JLM, Rossetti BJ, Rieken CW, Dewhirst FE, Borisy GG 2016. Biogeography of a human oral microbiome at the micron scale. PNAS 113:6E791–800
     [Google Scholar]
123. 123. 

     West PT, Probst AJ, Grigoriev IV, Thomas BC, Banfield JF 2018. Genome-reconstruction for eukaryotes from complex natural microbial communities. Genome Res 28:4569–80
     [Google Scholar]
124. 124. 

     Wilhelm RC, Singh R, Eltis LD, Mohn WW 2019. Bacterial contributions to delignification and lignocellulose degradation in forest soils with metagenomic and quantitative stable isotope probing. ISME J 13:2413–29
     [Google Scholar]
125. 125. 

     Wirbel J, Pyl PT, Kartal E, Zych K, Kashani A et al. 2019. Meta-analysis of fecal metagenomes reveals global microbial signatures that are specific for colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 25:4679–89
     [Google Scholar]
126. 126. 

     Wood DE, Lu J, Langmead B 2019. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol 20:1257
     [Google Scholar]
127. 127. 

     Wu Y-W, Simmons BA, Singer SW 2016. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 32:4605–7
     [Google Scholar]
128. 128. 

     Xie H, Guo R, Zhong H, Feng Q, Lan Z et al. 2016. Shotgun metagenomics of 250 adult twins reveals genetic and environmental impacts on the gut microbiome. Cell Syst 3:6572–84.e3
     [Google Scholar]
129. 129. 

     Yaffe E, Relman DA. 2019. Tracking microbial evolution in the human gut using Hi-C reveals extensive horizontal gene transfer, persistence and adaptation. Nat. Microbiol. 5:2343–53
     [Google Scholar]
130. 130. 

     Yassour M, Jason E, Hogstrom LJ, Arthur TD, Tripathi S et al. 2018. Strain-level analysis of mother-to-child bacterial transmission during the first few months of life. Cell Host Microbe 24:1146–54.e4
     [Google Scholar]
131. 131. 

     Ye SH, Siddle KJ, Park DJ, Sabeti PC 2019. Benchmarking metagenomics tools for taxonomic classification. Cell 178:4779–94
     [Google Scholar]
132. 132. 

     Zeevi D, Korem T, Godneva A, Bar N, Kurilshikov A et al. 2019. Structural variation in the gut microbiome associates with host health. Nature 568:775043–48
     [Google Scholar]
133. 133. 

     Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–29
     [Google Scholar]
134. 134. 

     Zhou W, Sailani MR, Contrepois K, Zhou Y, Ahadi S et al. 2019. Longitudinal multi-omics of host-microbe dynamics in prediabetes. Nature 569:7758663–71
     [Google Scholar]
135. 135. 

     Zlitni S, Bishara A, Moss EL, Tkachenko E, Kang JB et al. 2020. Strain-resolved microbiome sequencing reveals mobile elements that drive bacterial competition on a clinical timescale. Genome Med 12:50
     [Google Scholar]