Implicit Leadership Theories, Implicit Followership Theories, and Dynamic Processing of Leadership Information

Literature Cited

1. Acton BP, Foti RJ, Lord RG, Gladfelter JA 2019. Putting emergence back in leadership emergence: a dynamic, multilevel, process-oriented framework. Leadersh. Q. 30:145–64
   [Google Scholar]
2. Adriasola E, Lord RG. 2019. From a leader and a follower to shared leadership: a review of identity as antecedent of shared leadership. The Connecting Leader: Serving Concurrently as Leader and a Follower Z Jaser Charlotte, NC: Inf. Age Publ. In press
   [Google Scholar]
3. Agle BR, Nagarajan NJ, Sonnenfeld JA, Srinivasan D 2006. Does CEO charisma matter? An empirical analysis of the relationships among organizational performance, environmental uncertainty, and top management team perceptions of CEO charisma. Acad. Manag. J. 49:161–74
   [Google Scholar]
4. Alipour KK, Mohammed S, Martinez PN 2017. Incorporating temporality into implicit leadership and followership theories: exploring inconsistencies between time-based expectations and actual behaviors. Leadersh. Q. 28:2300–16
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ashforth BE, Schinoff BS. 2016. Identity under construction: how individuals come to define themselves in organizations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 3:111–37
   [Google Scholar]
6. Avolio BJ, Gardner WL. 2005. Authentic leadership development: getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadersh. Q. 16:315–38
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ayman-Nolley S, Ayman R. 2005. Children's implicit theories of leadership. Implicit Leadership Theories—Essays and Explorations B Schyns, JR Meindl 227–74 Greenwich, CT: Inf. Age Publ.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Baltes BB, Parker CP. 2000. Understanding and removing the effects of performance cues on behavioral ratings. J. Bus. Psychol. 15:229–46
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bass BM, Avolio BJ. 1989. Potential biases in leadership measures: how prototypes, leniency, and general satisfaction relate to ratings and rankings of transformational and transactional leadership constructs. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 49:3509–27
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bergman LR, Vargha A. 2013. Matching method to problem: a developmental science perspective. Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 10:9–28
    [Google Scholar]
11. Binning JF, Lord RG. 1980. Boundary conditions for performance cue effects on group process ratings: familiarity versus type of feedback. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 26:115–30
    [Google Scholar]
12. Boyd K, Foti RJ, Shah Y 2016. Measuring the effects of contextual constraints on perceptions of leadership Paper presented at the 31st Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Anaheim, CA:
13. Brodbeck FC, Frese M, Akerblom S, Audia G, Bakacsi G et al. 2000. Cultural variation of leadership prototypes across 22 European countries. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 73:1–29
    [Google Scholar]
14. Brown ME, Treviño LK. 2006. Ethical leadership: a review and future directions. Leadersh. Q. 17:6595–616
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bryman A. 1987. The generalizability of implicit leadership theory. J. Soc. Psychol. 127:2129–41
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cantor N, Mischel W. 1977. Traits as prototypes: effects on recognition memory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35:38–48
    [Google Scholar]
17. Chartrand TL, Bargh JA. 1999. The chameleon effect: the perception–behavior link and social interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76:6893–910
    [Google Scholar]
18. Chong S, Djurdjevic E, Johnson RE 2017. Implicit measures for leadership research. Handbook of Methods in Leadership Research B Schyns, RJ Hall, P Neves 13–47 Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
19. Clapp-Smith R, Hammond MM, Lester GV, Palanski M 2019. Promoting identity development in leadership education: a multidomain approach to developing the whole leader. J. Manag. Educ. 43:110–34
    [Google Scholar]
20. Coyle PT, Foti R. 2015. If you're not with me you're…? Examining prototypes and cooperation in leader–follower relationships. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 22:161–74
    [Google Scholar]
21. Day DV. 2000. Leadership development: a review in context. Leadersh. Q. 11:581–613
    [Google Scholar]
22. Day DV, Sin H-P. 2011. Longitudinal tests of an integrative model of leader development: charting and understanding developmental trajectories. Leadersh. Q. 22:545–60
    [Google Scholar]
23. DeRue DS. 2011. Adaptive leadership theory: leading and following as a complex adaptive process. Res. Organ. Behav. 31:125–50
    [Google Scholar]
24. DeRue DS, Ashford SJ. 2010. Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leader identity construction in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35:627–47
    [Google Scholar]
25. DeRue DS, Nahrgang JD, Ashford SJ 2015. Interpersonal perceptions and the emergence of leadership structures in groups: a network perspective. Organ. Sci. 26:1192–209
    [Google Scholar]
26. Eden D, Leviatan U. 1975. Implicit leadership theory as determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales. J. Appl. Psychol. 60:736–41
    [Google Scholar]
27. Edwards JR. 1994. The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: critique and a proposed alternative. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 58:51–100
    [Google Scholar]
28. Ehrhart MG. 2012. Self-concept, implicit leadership theories, and follower preferences for leadership. Z. Psychol. 220:231–40
    [Google Scholar]
29. Engle EM, Lord RG. 1997. Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. Acad. Manag. J. 40:988–1010
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ensari N, Murphy SE. 2003. Cross-cultural variations in leadership perceptions and attribution of charisma to the leader. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 92:152–66
    [Google Scholar]
31. Epitropaki O, Kark R, Mainemelis C, Lord RG 2017. Leadership, followership and identity processes: a multilevel review. Leadersh. Q. 28:104–29
    [Google Scholar]
32. Epitropaki O, Martin R. 2004. Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: factor structure, generalizability and stability over time. J. Appl. Psychol. 89:293–310
    [Google Scholar]
33. Epitropaki O, Martin R. 2005. From ideal to real: a longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:4659–76
    [Google Scholar]
34. Epitropaki O, Mueller J, Lord RG 2018. Unpacking the socio-cognitive foundations of creative leadership: bridging implicit leadership and implicit creativity theories. Creative Leadership: Contexts and Prospects C Mainemelis, O Epitropaki, R Kark 39–55 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
35. Epitropaki O, Sy T, Martin R, Tram-Quon S, Topakas A 2013. Implicit leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. Leadersh. Q. 24:858–81
    [Google Scholar]
36. Foti RJ, Bray BC, Thompson NJ, Allgood SF 2012. Know thy self, know thy leader: contributions of a pattern-oriented approach to examining leadership perceptions. Leadersh. Q. 23:702–17
    [Google Scholar]
37. Foti RJ, Fraser SL, Lord RG 1982. Effects of leadership labels and prototypes on perceptions of political leaders. J. Appl. Psychol. 67:326–33
    [Google Scholar]
38. Foti RJ, Hansbrough TK, Epitropaki O, Coyle PT 2017. Dynamic viewpoints on implicit leadership and followership theories: approaches, findings, and future directions. Leadersh. Q. 28:261–66
    [Google Scholar]
39. Foti RJ, Knee RE Jr, Backert RS 2008. Multi-level implications of framing leadership perceptions as a dynamic process. Leadersh. Q. 19:178–94
    [Google Scholar]
40. Foti RJ, Lord RG. 1987. Prototypes and scripts: the effects of alternative methods of processing information. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 39:318–41
    [Google Scholar]
41. Foti RJ, McCusker ME. 2017. Person-oriented approaches to leadership: a roadmap forward. Handbook of Methods in Leadership Research B Schyns, R Hall, P Neves 195–228 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Gabora L, Rosch E, Aerts D 2008. Toward an ecological theory of concepts. Ecol. Psychol. 20:84–116
    [Google Scholar]
43. Galambos JA, Abelson RP, Black JB 1986. Knowledge Structures Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
44. Gerstner CR, Day DV. 1994. Cross-cultural comparison of leadership prototypes. Leadersh. Q. 5:2121–34
    [Google Scholar]
45. Giessner SR, van Knippenberg D, Sleebos E 2009. License to fail? How leader group prototypicality moderates the effect of leader performance on perceptions of leadership effectiveness. Leadersh. Q. 20:434–51
    [Google Scholar]
46. Grossberg S. 2013. Adaptive resonance theory: how a brain learns to consciously attend, learn and recognize a changing world. Neural Netw 37:1–47
    [Google Scholar]
47. Guillén L, Mayo M, Korotov K 2015. Is leadership a part of me? A leader identity approach to understanding the motivation to lead. Leadersh. Q. 26:5802–20
    [Google Scholar]
48. Hains SC, Hogg MA, Duck JM 1997. Self-categorization and leadership: effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 23:1087–99
    [Google Scholar]
49. Hanges PJ, Lord RG, Dickson MW 2000. An information-processing perspective on leadership and culture: a case for connectionist architecture. Appl. Psychol. 49:1133–61
    [Google Scholar]
50. Hannah ST, Woolfolk RL, Lord RG 2009. Leader self‐structure: a framework for positive leadership. J. Organ. Behav. 30:2269–90
    [Google Scholar]
51. Hansbrough TK, Lord RG, Schyns B 2015. Reconsidering the accuracy of follower leadership ratings. Leadersh. Q. 26:220–37
    [Google Scholar]
52. Haslam SA, Platow MJ. 2001. The link between leadership and followership: how affirming social identity translates vision into action. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27:111469–79
    [Google Scholar]
53. Hoffman EL, Lord RG. 2013. A taxonomy of event-level dimensions: implications for understanding leadership processes, behavior, and performance. Leadersh. Q. 24:558–71
    [Google Scholar]
54. Hogg MA. 2001. A social identity theory of leadership. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 5:3184–200
    [Google Scholar]
55. House R, Javidan M, Hanges P, Dorfman P 2002. Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: an introduction to project GLOBE. J. World Bus. 37:13–10
    [Google Scholar]
56. Jaser Z. 2017. Pulled in two directions. Being in concert a leader to some and a follower to others. Acad. Manag. Proc. 2017. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.107
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
57. Junker NM, van Dick R 2014. Implicit theories in organizational settings: a systematic review and research agenda of implicit leadership and followership theories. Leadersh. Q. 25:1154–73
    [Google Scholar]
58. Karelaia N, Guillén L. 2014. Me, a woman and a leader: positive social identity and identity conflict. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 125:204–19
    [Google Scholar]
59. Keller T. 1999. Images of the familiar: individual differences and implicit leadership theories. Leadersh. Q. 10:4589–607
    [Google Scholar]
60. Keller T. 2003. Parental images as a guide to leadership sensemaking: an attachment perspective on implicit leadership theories. Leadersh. Q. 14:141–60
    [Google Scholar]
61. Kruse ET, Sy T. 2011. Manipulating implicit theories through inducing affect. Acad. Manag. Proc. 2011. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2011.65870487
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
62. Kwok N, Hanig S, Brown DJ, Shen W 2018. How leader role identity influences the process of leader emergence: a social network analysis. Leadersh. Q. 29:648–62
    [Google Scholar]
63. Lankau MJ, Chung BG. 2009. A comparison of American and international prototypes of successful managers. J. Leadersh. Stud. 3:7–18
    [Google Scholar]
64. Larson JR Jr 1982. Cognitive mechanisms mediating the impact of implicit leadership theories of leader behavior on leader behavior ratings. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 29:129–40
    [Google Scholar]
65. Larson JR Jr, Lingle JH, Scerbo MM. 1984. The impact of performance cues on leader-behavior ratings: the role of selective information availability and probabilistic response bias. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 33:323–49
    [Google Scholar]
66. Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Liao C, Meuser JD 2014. Servant leadership and serving culture: influence on individual and unit performance. Acad. Manag. J. 57:51434–52
    [Google Scholar]
67. Ling W, Chia RC, Fang L 2000. Chinese implicit leadership theory. J. Soc. Psychol. 140:729–39
    [Google Scholar]
68. Lord RG. 1985a. Accuracy in behavioral measurement: an alternative definition based on raters' cognitive schema and signal detection theory. J. Appl. Psychol. 70:66–71
    [Google Scholar]
69. Lord RG. 1985b. An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership perceptions and behavioral measurement on organizational settings. Research in Organizational Behavior BM Staw, L Cummings 87–128 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
    [Google Scholar]
70. Lord RG, Binning JF, Rush MC, Thomas JC 1978. The effect of performance cues and leader behavior on questionnaire ratings of leadership behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 21:27–39
    [Google Scholar]
71. Lord RG, Brown DJ. 2004. Leadership Processes and Follower Self-Identity Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
72. Lord RG, Brown DJ, Freiberg SJ 1999. Understanding the dynamics of leadership: the role of follower self-concepts in the leader/follower relationship. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 78:3167–203
    [Google Scholar]
73. Lord RG, Brown DJ, Harvey JL 2001a. System constraints on leadership perceptions, behavior and influence: an example of connectionist level processing. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes MA Hogg, S Tindale 283–310 Malden, MA: Blackwell Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Lord RG, Brown DJ, Harvey JL, Hall RJ 2001b. Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multi-level consequences for leadership perceptions. Leaderh. Q. 12:311–38
    [Google Scholar]
75. Lord RG, Foti RJ, De Vader CL 1984. A test of leadership categorization theory: internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 34:3343–78
    [Google Scholar]
76. Lord RG, Foti RJ, Phillips JS 1982. A theory of leadership categorization. Leadership: Beyond Establishment Views JG Hunt, V Sekaran, C Schriesheim 104–21 Carbondale, IL: S. Ill. Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
77. Lord RG, Maher KJ. 1991. Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance Boston: Unwin Hyman
78. MacDonald HA, Sulsky LM, Brown DJ 2008. Leadership and perceiver cognition: examining the role of self-identity in implicit leadership theories. Hum. Perform. 21:333–53
    [Google Scholar]
79. Mainemelis C, Kark R, Epitropaki O 2015. Creative leadership: a multi-context conceptualization. Acad. Manag. Ann. 9:393–482
    [Google Scholar]
80. Martell RF, Evans DP. 2005. Source-monitoring training: toward reducing rater expectancy effects in behavioral management. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:5956–63
    [Google Scholar]
81. Martin R, Epitropaki O, O'Broin L 2018. Methodological issues in leadership training research: in pursuit of causality. Methodological Challenges and Advances in Managerial and Organizational Cognition RJ Galavan, GP Sund, KJ Hodgkinson 73–94 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Meindl JR. 1995. The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: a social constructionist approach. Leadersh. Q. 6:329–41
    [Google Scholar]
83. Miscenko D, Guenter H, Day DV 2017. Am I a leader? Examining leader identity development over time. Leadersh. Q. 28:605–20
    [Google Scholar]
84. Morgeson FP, Mitchell TR, Liu D 2015. Event system theory: an event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Acad. Manag. Rev. 40:515–37
    [Google Scholar]
85. Offermann LR, Coats MR. 2017. Implicit theories of leadership: stability and change over two decades. Leadersh. Q. 29:513–22
    [Google Scholar]
86. Offermann LR, Kennedy JK, Wirtz PW 1994. Implicit leadership theories: content, structure, and generalizability. Leadersh. Q. 5:143–58
    [Google Scholar]
87. Porr D, Fields D. 2006. Implicit leadership effects on multi-source ratings for management development. J. Manag. Psychol. 21:651–68
    [Google Scholar]
88. Phillips JS. 1984. The accuracy of leadership ratings: a cognitive categorization perspective. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 33:125–38
    [Google Scholar]
89. Phillips JS, Lord RG. 1981. Causal attributions and perceptions of leadership. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 28:143–63
    [Google Scholar]
90. Phillips JS, Lord RG. 1982. Schematic information processing and perceptions of leadership in problem solving groups. J. Appl. Psychol. 67:486–92
    [Google Scholar]
91. Riggs B, Porter C. 2017. Are there advantages to seeing leadership the same? A test of the mediating effects of LMX on the relationship between ILT congruence and employees’ development. Leadersh. Q. 28:285–99
    [Google Scholar]
92. Ritter BA, Lord RG. 2007. The impact of previous leaders on the evaluation of new leaders: an alternative to prototype matching. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:1683–95
    [Google Scholar]
93. Rosch E. 1978. Principles of categorization. Cognition and Categorization E Rosch, BB Lloyd 27–48 Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
    [Google Scholar]
94. Rosette AS, Leonardelli GJ, Phillips KW 2008. The white standard: racial bias in leader categorization. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:758–77
    [Google Scholar]
95. Ross L. 1977. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10 L Berkowitz 173–220 New York: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
96. Rush MC, Phillips JS, Lord RG 1981. Effects of a temporal delay in rating on leader behavior descriptions: a laboratory investigation. J. Appl. Psychol. 66:442–50
    [Google Scholar]
97. Rush MC, Russell JEA. 1988. Leader prototypes and prototype-contingent consensus in leader behavior descriptions. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 23:88–104
    [Google Scholar]
98. Rush MC, Thomas JC, Lord RG 1977. Implicit leadership theory: a potential threat to the internal validity of leader behavior questionnaires. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 20:93–110
    [Google Scholar]
99. Schank RC, Abelson RP. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
100. Schneider DJ. 2005. The Psychology of Stereotyping New York: Guilford Press
101. Schyns B, Kiefer T, Kerschreiter R, Tymon A 2011. Teaching implicit leadership theories to develop leaders and leadership: how and why it can make a difference. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 10:397–408
     [Google Scholar]
102. Scott KA, Brown DJ. 2006. Female first, leader second? Gender bias in the encoding of leadership behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 101:2230–42
     [Google Scholar]
103. Shamir B, Pillai R, Bligh MC, Uhl-Bien M 2007. Follower-Centered Perspectives on Leadership: A Tribute to the Memory of James R. Meindl Charlotte, NC: Inf. Age Publ.
104. Shondrick SJ, Dinh JE, Lord RG 2010. Developments in implicit leadership theory and cognitive science: applications to improving measurement and understanding alternatives to hierarchical leadership. Leadersh. Q. 21:959–78
     [Google Scholar]
105. Shondrick SJ, Lord RG. 2010. Implicit leadership and followership theories: dynamic structures for leadership perceptions, memory and leader-follower processes. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 25 GP Hodgkinson, JK Ford 1–33 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
     [Google Scholar]
106. Smith ER. 1998. Mental representation and memory. The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2 DT Gilbert, ST Fiske, G Lindzey 391–445 New York: McGraw-Hill
     [Google Scholar]
107. Smith JA, Foti RJ. 1998. A pattern approach to the study of leader emergence. Leadersh. Q. 9:147–60
     [Google Scholar]
108. Smolensky P. 1986. Information processing in dynamical systems: foundations of harmony theory. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 1: Foundations DE Rumelhart, JL McClelland 194–281 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
109. Steffens NK, Haslam SA, Jetten J, Mols F 2018. Our followers are lions, theirs are sheep: how social identity shapes theories about followership and social influence. Political Psychol 39:23–42
     [Google Scholar]
110. Stock RM, Özbek-Potthoff G. 2014. Implicit leadership in an intercultural context: theory extension and empirical investigation. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 25:1651–68
     [Google Scholar]
111. Sy T. 2010. What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure and consequences of implicit followership theories. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 113:73–84
     [Google Scholar]
112. Sy T, Eden D. 2014. The art of followership: applying organizational aesthetics to trigger implicit followership theories and corresponding action tendencies Poster presented at the 29th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Honolulu, HI:
113. Sy T, Shore LM, Strauss J, Shore TH, Tram S et al. 2010. Leadership perceptions as a function of race-occupation fit: the case of Asian Americans. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:902–19
     [Google Scholar]
114. Tajfel H. 1978. Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations New York: Academic
115. Topakas A. 2011. Measurement of implicit leadership theories and their effect on leadership processes and outcomes PhD Diss., Aston Univ Birmingham, UK:
116. Trichas S, Schyns B, Lord RG, Hall RJ 2017. Facing leaders: facial expression and leadership perception. Leadersh. Q. 28:317–33
     [Google Scholar]
117. Tu M-H, Bono JE, Shum C, LaMontagne L 2018. Breaking the cycle: the effects of role model performance and ideal leadership self-concepts on abusive supervision spillover. J. Appl. Psychol. 103:689–702
     [Google Scholar]
118. Tulving E. 1985. How many memory systems are there?. Am. Psychol. 40:385–98
     [Google Scholar]
119. Tulving E. 2005. Episodic memory and autonoesis: Uniquely human?. The Missing Link in Cognition HS Terrace, J Metcalfe 4–56 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
120. Uhl-Bien M, Riggio RE, Lowe KB, Carsten MK 2014. Followership theory: a review and research agenda. Leadersh. Q. 25:83–104
     [Google Scholar]
121. Uhlmann EL, Leavitt K, Menges JL, Koopman J, Howe M, Johnson RE 2012. Getting explicit about the implicit: a taxonomy of implicit measures and guide for their use in organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 15:4553–601
     [Google Scholar]
122. van Gils S, van Quaquebeke N, van Knippenberg D 2010. The X-factor: on the relevance of implicit leadership and followership theories for leader–member exchange agreement. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 19:333–63
     [Google Scholar]
123. van Knippenberg D, Hogg MA 2018. Social identifications in organizational behavior. The Self at Work DL Ferris, RE Johnson, C Sedikides 72–90 New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
124. Weick KE. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
125. Weiss HW, Adler S. 1981. Cognitive complexity and the structure of implicit leadership theories. J. Appl. Psychol. 66:69–78
     [Google Scholar]
126. Whiteley P, Sy T, Johnson SK 2012. Leaders' conceptions of followers: implications for naturally occurring Pygmalion effects. Leadersh. Q. 23:5822–34
     [Google Scholar]
127. Winocur G, Moscovitch M, Bontempi B 2010. Memory formation and long-term retention in humans and animals: convergence towards a transformation account of hippocampal–neocortical interactions. Neuropsychologia 48:82339–56
     [Google Scholar]
128. Wofford JC, Goodwin VL, Whittington JL 1998. A field study of a cognitive approach to understanding transformational and transactional leadership. Leadersh. Q. 9:55–84
     [Google Scholar]
129. Wofford JC, Joplin JR, Cornforth B 1996. Use of simultaneous verbal protocols in analysis of group leaders' cognitions. Psychol. Rep. 79:847–58
     [Google Scholar]
130. Zarate MA, Smith ER. 1990. Person categorization and stereotyping. Soc. Cogn. 8:161–85
     [Google Scholar]