1932

Abstract

Political psychology in international relations (IR) has undergone a dramatic transformation in the past two decades, mirroring the broader changes occurring in IR itself. This review examines the current state of the field. We begin by offering a data-driven snapshot analyzing four years of manuscript classifications at a major IR journal to characterize the questions that IR scholars engaged in psychological research are and are not investigating. We then emphasize six developments in particular, both present-day growth areas (an increased interest in emotions and hot cognition, the rise of more psychologically informed work on public opinion, a nascent research tradition we call the first image reversed, and the rise of neurobiological and evolutionary approaches) and calls for additional scholarship (better integration of the study of mass and elite political behavior and more psychological work in international political economy). Together, these developments constitute some of the directions in which we see the next generation of scholarship heading.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041916-020042
2018-05-11
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/21/1/annurev-polisci-041916-020042.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041916-020042&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abdelal R, Herrera YM, Johnston AI, McDermott R 2009. Measuring Identity: A Guide for Social Scientists Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  2. Axelrod R 1976. Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  3. Bar-Joseph U, McDermott R 2017. Intelligence Success and Failure: The Human Factor Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  4. Baum MA, Potter PB 2015. War and Democratic Constraint: How the Public Influences Foreign Policy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  5. Bayram AB 2015. What drives modern Diogenes? Individual values and cosmopolitan allegiance. Eur. J. Int. Relat. 21:451–79
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bayram AB 2017. Due deference: cosmopolitan social identity and the psychology of legal obligation in international politics. Int. Organ. 71:S136–63
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Berinsky AJ 2009. In Time of War: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  8. Berntson GG, Cacioppo JT 2004. Multilevel analyses and reductionism: why social psychologists should care about neuroscience and vice versa. Essays in Social Neuroscience JT Cacioppo, GG Berntson 107–20 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Berrebi C, Klor EF 2008. Are voters sensitive to terrorism? Direct evidence from the Israeli electorate. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 102:279–301
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bially Mattern J 2011. A practice theory of emotion for international relations. International Practices E Adler, V Pouliot 63–86 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Blattman C 2009. From violence to voting: war and political participation in Uganda. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 103:231–47
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bleiker R, Hutchison E 2008. Fear no more: emotions and world politics. Rev. Int. Stud. 34:115–35
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Boettcher WAI 1995. Context, methods, numbers, and words: prospect theory in international relations. J. Confl. Resolut. 39:561–83
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Brody R 1969. The study of international politics qua science. Contending Approaches to International Politics K Knorr, JN Rosenau 110–28 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Brooks SM, Cunha R, Mosley L 2015. Categories, creditworthiness, and contagion: how investors' shortcuts affect sovereign debt markets. Int. Stud. Q. 59:587–601
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Broude T 2015. Behavioral international law. Univ. Penn. Law Rev. 163:1099–157
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Byman DL, Pollack KM 2001. Let us now praise great men: bringing the statesman back. Int. Secur. 25:107–46
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Callen M, Isaqzadeh M, Long JD, Sprenger C 2014. Violence and risk preference: experimental evidence from Afghanistan. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:123–48
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Canetti D, Hirschberger G, Rapaport C, Elad-Strenger J, Ein-Dor T et al. 2018. Collective trauma from the lab to the real world: the effects of the Holocaust on contemporary Israeli political cognitions. Political Psychol 39:3–21
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Canetti-Nisim D, Halperin E, Sharvit K, Hobfoll SE 2009. A new stress-based model of political extremism: personal exposure to terrorism, psychological distress, and exclusionist political attitudes. J. Confl. Resolut. 53:363–89
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Caspi A, Moffitt TE 2006. Gene–environment interactions in psychiatry: joining forces with neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7:583–90
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Cederman LE, Gleditsch KS, Buhaug H 2013. Inequality, Grievances, and Civil War Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  23. Chaudoin S 2014. Promises or policies? An experimental analysis of international agreements and audience reactions. Int. Organ. 68:235–56
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Chilton A 2014. The influence of international human rights agreements on public opinion: an experimental study. Chicago J. Int. Law 15:110–37
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Cohen DK 2017. Rape During Civil War Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  26. Cohrs JC, Moschner B, Maes J 2005. The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 31:1425–34
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Colgan JD 2016. Where is international relations going? Evidence from graduate training. Int. Stud. Q. 60:486–98
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Crawford NC 2000. The passion of world politics: propositions on emotion and emotional relationships. Int. Secur. 24:116–56
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Cuhadar E, Kaarbo J, Kesgin B, Ozkececi-Taner B 2017. Personality or role? Comparisons of Turkish leaders across different institutional positions. Political Psychol 38:39–54
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Debs A, Monteiro NP 2014. Known unknowns: power shifts, uncertainty, and war. Int. Organ. 68:1–31
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Druckman JN, Kam CD 2011. Students as experimental participants: a defense of the “narrow data base”. Handbook of Experimental Political Science JN Druckman, DP Green, JH Kuklinski, A Lupia 41–57 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Dunne T, Hansen L, Wight C 2013. The end of international relations theory. ? Eur. J. Int. Relat. 19:405–25
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Dyson SB 2006. Personality and foreign policy: Tony Blair's Iraq decisions. Foreign Policy Anal 2:289–306
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Elms DK 2008. New directions for IPE: drawing from behavioral economics. Int. Stud. Rev. 10:239–65
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Elster J 2007. Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  36. Fearon J 1995. Rationalist explanations for war. Int. Organ. 49:379–414
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Fessler DMT, Holbrook C, Gervais MM 2014. Men's physical strength moderates conceptualizations of prospective foes in two disparate societies. Hum. Nat. 25:393–409
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Fordham BO, Kleinberg KB 2012. How can economic interests influence support for free trade. ? Int. Organ. 66:311–28
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Friedman JA, Lerner JS, Zeckhauser R 2017. Behavioral consequences of probabilistic precision: experimental evidence from national security professionals. Int. Organ. 71:803–26
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Fuhrmann M, Horowitz MC 2015. When leaders matter: rebel experience and nuclear proliferation. J. Politics 77:72–87
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Gallagher ME, Allen SH 2014. Presidential personality: not just a nuisance. Foreign Policy Anal 10:1–21
    [Google Scholar]
  42. George AL 1969. The “operational code”: a neglected approach to the study of political leaders and decision making. Int. Stud. Q. 13:190–222
    [Google Scholar]
  43. George AL, George JL 1956. Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House: A Personality Study New York: John Day Co.
  44. Gerber AS, Huber GA, Doherty D, Dowling CM, Ha SE 2010. Personality and political attitudes: relationships across issue domains and political contexts. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 104:111–33
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Getmansky A, Zeitzoff T 2014. Terrorism and voting: the effect of rocket threat on voting in Israeli elections. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 108:588–604
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Gilligan MJ, Pasquale BJ, Samii C 2014. Civil war and social cohesion: lab-in-the-field evidence from Nepal. Am. J. Political Sci. 58:604–19
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Goldgeier J, Tetlock P 2001. Psychology and international relations theory. Annu. Rev. Political Sci 4:67–92
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Goldstein J, Keohane RO 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  49. Gourevitch P 1978. The second image reversed: the international sources of domestic politics. Int. Organ. 32:881–912
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Graham J, Haidt J, Nosek BA 2009. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 96:1029–46
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Gries PH 2014. The Politics of American Foreign Policy: How Ideology Divides Liberals and Conservatives Over Foreign Affairs Redwood City, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  52. Grossman G, Manekin D, Miodownik D 2015. The political legacies of combat: attitudes toward war and peace among Israeli ex-combatants. Int. Organ. 69:981–1009
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Guisinger A 2017. American Opinion on Trade: Preferences Without Politics Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  54. Hafner-Burton EM, Haggard S, Lake DA, Victor DG 2017. The behavioral revolution and the study of international relations. Int. Organ. 71:S1–31
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Hafner-Burton EM, LeVeck BL, Victor DG 2015. How activists perceive the utility of international law. J. Politics 78:167–80
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Hainmueller J, Hiscox MJ 2010. Attitudes toward highly skilled and low-skilled immigration: evidence from a survey experiment. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 104:61–84
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Hall J, Kovras I, Stefanovic D, Loizides N 2017. Exposure to violence and attitudes towards transitional justice. Political Psychol In press. doi: 10.1111/pops.12412
  58. Hall T, Yarhi-Milo K 2012. The personal touch: leaders' impressions, costly signaling, and assessments of sincerity in international affairs. Int. Stud. Q. 56:560–73
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Hall TH 2015. Emotional Diplomacy: Official Emotion on the International Stage Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  60. Hall TH, Ross AA 2015. Affective politics after 9/11. Int. Organ. 69:847–79
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Halperin E, Russell AG, Dweck CS, Gross JJ 2011. Anger, hatred, and the quest for peace: Anger can be constructive in the absence of hatred. J. Confl. Resolut. 55:274–91
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Harris AS, Findley MG 2014. Is ethnicity identifiable? Lessons from an experiment in South Africa. J. Confl. Resolut. 58:4–33
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Hermann MG, Preston T, Korany B, Shaw TM 2001. Who leads matters: the effects of powerful individuals. Int. Stud. Rev. 3:88–131
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Herrmann RK 1985. Perceptions and Behavior in Soviet Foreign Policy Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. Pittsburgh Press
  65. Herrmann RK, Tetlock PE, Visser PS 1999. Mass public decisions to go to war: a cognitive-interactionist framework. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 93:553–73
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Holmes M 2013. Mirror neurons and the problem of intentions. Int. Organ. 67:829–61
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Holmes M 2018. Face-to-Face Diplomacy: Social Neuroscience and International Relations Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. In press
  68. Holmes M, Traven D 2015. Acting rationally without really thinking: the logic of rational intuitionism for international relations theory. Int. Stud. Rev. 17:414–40
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Holsti OR 1979. The three-headed eagle: the United States and system change. Int. Stud. Q. 23:339–59
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Holsti OR, George AL 1975. The effects of stress on the performance of foreign policy-makers. In Political Science Annual, ed. CP Cotter 6255–319 Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Hopf T 2010. The logic of habit in international relations. Eur. J. Int. Relat. 16:539–61
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Horgan J 2005. The Psychology of Terrorism New York: Routledge
  73. Horowitz M, Stewart B, Tingley D, Bishop M, Resnick L et al. 2017. What makes foreign policy teams tick: explaining variation in group performance at geopolitical forecasting Work. Pap., Harvard Univ Cambridge, MA:
  74. Horowitz MC, Stam AC 2014. How prior military experience influences the future militarized behavior of leaders. Int. Organ. 68:527–59
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Horowitz MC, Stam AC, Ellis CM 2015. Why Leaders Fight Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  76. Hudson VM 2005. Foreign policy analysis: actor-specific theory and the ground of international relations. Foreign Policy Anal 1:1–30
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Hurwitz J, Peffley M 1987. How are foreign policy attitudes structured. ? Am. Political Sci. Rev. 81:1099–120
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Hutchison E 2016. Affective Communities in World Politics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  79. Hyde SD 2015. Experiments in international relations: lab, survey, and field. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 18:403–24
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Hymans JE 2006. The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions and Foreign Policy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  81. Imai K, Keele L, Tingley DH, Yamamoto T 2011. Unpacking the black box of causality: learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 105:765–89
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Jervis R 2006. Reports, politics, and intelligence failures: the case of Iraq. J. Strateg. Stud. 29:3–52
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Jervis R 2013. Do leaders matter and how would we know. ? Secur. Stud. 22:153–79
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Jervis R 2017. Perception and Misperception in International Politics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 2nd ed..
  85. Jervis R, Lebow RN, Stein JG 1985. Psychology and Deterrence Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  86. Jha S, Wilkinson S 2012. Does combat experience foster organizational skill? Evidence from ethnic cleansing during the partition of South Asia. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 106:883–907
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Johnson DD, Toft MD 2013. Grounds for war: the evolution of territorial conflict. Int. Secur. 38:7–38
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Kaarbo J 2015. A foreign policy analysis perspective on the domestic politics turn in IR. Int. Stud. Rev. 17:189–216
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Kahler M 1998. Rationality in international relations. Int. Organ. 52:919–41
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Kahneman D 2011. Thinking Fast and Slow New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux
  91. Keller JW, Yang YE 2008. Leadership style, decision context, and the poliheuristic theory of decision making: an experimental analysis. J. Confl. Resolut. 52:687–712
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Kertzer JD 2016. Resolve in International Politics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  93. Kertzer JD 2017. Microfoundations in international relations. Confl. Manag. Peace Sci. 34:81–97
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Kertzer JD, McGraw KM 2012. Folk realism: testing the microfoundations of realism in ordinary citizens. Int. Stud. Q. 56:245–58
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Kertzer JD, Powers KE, Rathbun BC, Iyer R 2014. Moral support: how moral values shape foreign policy attitudes. J. Politics 76:825–40
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Kertzer JD, Rathbun BC 2015. Fair is fair: social preferences and reciprocity in international politics. World Politics 67:613–55
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Kertzer JD, Renshon J, Yarhi-Milo K 2016. How do observers assess resolve? Work. Pap., Havard Univ Cambridge, MA:
  98. Kinder DR 1998. Opinion and action in the realm of politics. The Handbook of Social Psychology DT Gilbert, ST Fiske, G Lindzey 778–867 New York: McGraw-Hill. , 4th ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Kinnvall C, Mitzen J 2017. An introduction to the special issue: ontological securities in world politics. Coop. Confl. 52:3–11
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Krosnick JA, McGraw KM 2002. Psychological political science versus political psychology true to its name: a plea for balance. Political Psychology KR Monroe 79–94 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Lake DA 2010. Two cheers for bargaining theory: assessing rationalist explanations of the Iraq War. Int. Secur. 35:7–52
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Lake DA 2013. Theory is dead, long live theory: the end of the great debates and the rise of eclecticism in international relations. Eur. J. Int. Relat. 19:567–87
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Larson DW 1985. Origins of Containment: A Psychological Explanation Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  104. LeVeck BL, Hughes DA, Fowler JH, Hafner-Burton E, Victor DG 2014. The role of self-interest in elite bargaining. PNAS 111:18536–41
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Levy JS 1997. Prospect theory, rational choice, and international relations. Int. Stud. Q. 41:87–112
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Levy JS 2013. Psychology and foreign policy decision-making. Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology L Huddy, DO Sears, JS Levy 301–33 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press. , 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Liberman P 2007. Punitiveness and U.S. elite support for the 1991 Persian Gulf War. J. Confl. Resolut. 51:3–32
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Little AT, Zeitzoff T 2017. A bargaining theory of conflict with evolutionary preferences. Int. Organ. 71:523–57
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Lopez AC, McDermott R, Petersen MB 2011. States in mind: evolution, coalitional psychology, and international politics. Int. Secur. 36:48–83
    [Google Scholar]
  110. X, Scheve K, Slaughter MJ 2012. Inequity aversion and the international distribution of trade protection. Am. J. Political Sci. 56:638–54
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Lupu N, Peisakhin L 2017. The legacy of political violence across generations. Am. J. Political Sci. 61:836–51
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Malle BF, Knobe JM, Nelson SE 2007. Actor-observer asymmetries in explanations of behavior: new answers to an old question. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 93:491–514
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Mansfield ED, Mutz DC 2009. Support for free trade: self-interest, sociotropic politics, and out-group anxiety. Int. Organ. 63:425–57
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Mansfield ED, Mutz DC 2013. Us versus them: mass attitudes toward offshore outsourcing. World Politics 65:571–608
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Maynard-Smith J, Harper D 2003. Animal Signals Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  116. McDermott R 1998. Risk-Taking in International Politics: Prospect Theory in American Foreign Policy Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  117. McDermott R 2004.a The feeling of rationality: the meaning of neuroscientific advances for political science. Perspect. Politics 2:691–706
    [Google Scholar]
  118. McDermott R 2004.b Prospect theory in political science: gains and losses from the first decade. Political Psychol 25:289–312
    [Google Scholar]
  119. McDermott R 2014. The biological bases for aggressiveness and nonaggressiveness in presidents. Foreign Policy Anal 10:313–27
    [Google Scholar]
  120. McDermott R, Fowler JH, Smirnov O 2008. On the evolutionary origin of prospect theory preferences. J. Politics 70:335–50
    [Google Scholar]
  121. McDermott R, Hatemi PK 2014. The study of international politics in the neurobiological revolution: a review of leadership and political violence. Millennium 43:92–123
    [Google Scholar]
  122. McDermott R, Tingley D, Cowden J, Frazzetto G, Johnson DDP 2009. Monoamine oxidase A gene (MAOA) predicts behavioral aggression following provocation. PNAS 106:2118–23
    [Google Scholar]
  123. McDoom OS 2012. The psychology of threat in intergroup conflict: emotions, rationality, and opportunity in the Rwandan genocide. Int. Secur. 37:119–55
    [Google Scholar]
  124. McFarland S, Mathews M 2005. Who cares about human rights. ? Political Psychol 26:365–85
    [Google Scholar]
  125. McGillivray F, Smith A 2008. Punishing the Prince: A Theory of Interstate Relations, Political Institutions, and Leader Change Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  126. Mercer J 2005.a Prospect theory and political science. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 8:1–21
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Mercer J 2005.b Rationality and psychology in international politics. Int. Organ. 59:77–106
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Mercer J 2010. Emotional beliefs. Int. Organ. 64:1–31
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Mercer J 2014. Feeling like a state: social emotion and identity. Int. Theory 6:515–35
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Miller GA 2003. The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7:141–44
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Mintz A 2004. Foreign policy decision making in familiar and unfamiliar settings: an experimental study of high-ranking military officers. J. Confl. Resolut. 48:91–104
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Mintz A 2007. Behavioral IR as a subfield of international relations. Int. Stud. Rev. 9:157–72
    [Google Scholar]
  133. Mintz A, Wayne C 2016. The polythink syndrome and elite group decision-making. Political Psychol 37:3–21
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Morrison JA 2016. Shocking intellectual austerity: the role of ideas in the demise of the gold standard in Britain. Int. Organ. 70:175–207
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Nunn N, Wantchekon L 2011. The slave trade and the origins of mistrust in Africa. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:3221–52
    [Google Scholar]
  136. O'Neill B 1999. Honor, Symbols and War Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  137. Petersen MB 2015. Evolutionary political psychology: on the origin and structure of heuristics and biases in politics. Adv. Political Psychol. 36:45–78
    [Google Scholar]
  138. Petersen RD 2002. Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred, and Resentment in Twentieth-Century Eastern Europe Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  139. Pouliot V 2008. The logic of practicality: a theory of practice of security communities. Int. Organ. 62:257–88
    [Google Scholar]
  140. Poulsen LNS, Aisbett E 2013. When the claim hits: bilateral investment treaties and bounded rational learning. World Politics 65:273–313
    [Google Scholar]
  141. Prather L 2014. Values at the water's edge: social welfare values and foreign aid Work. Pap., Univ. Calif. San Diego, La Jolla, CA
  142. Press DG, Sagan SD, Valentino BA 2013. Atomic aversion: experimental evidence on taboos, traditions, and the non-use of nuclear weapons. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 107:188–206
    [Google Scholar]
  143. Quek K 2017. Rationalist experiments on war. Political Sci. Res. Methods 5:123–42
    [Google Scholar]
  144. Rabin M 2002. A perspective on psychology and economics. Eur. Econ. Rev. 46:657–85
    [Google Scholar]
  145. Rapport A 2015. Waging War, Planning Peace: U.S. Noncombat Operations and Major Wars. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  146. Rathbun BC 2014. Diplomacy's Value: Creating Security in 1920s Europe and the Contemporary Middle East Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  147. Rathbun BC, Kertzer JD, Paradis M 2017. Homo diplomaticus: mixed-method evidence of variation in strategic rationality. Int. Organ. 71:S33–60
    [Google Scholar]
  148. Rathbun BC, Kertzer JD, Reifler J, Goren P, Scotto TJ 2016. Taking foreign policy personally: personal values and foreign policy attitudes. Int. Stud. Q. 60:124–37
    [Google Scholar]
  149. Reed W, Clark D, Nordstrom T, Siegel D 2016. Bargaining in the shadow of a commitment problem. Res. Politics 3:1–9
    [Google Scholar]
  150. Renshon J 2008. Stability and change in belief systems: the operational code of George W. Bush. J. Confl. Resolut. 52:820–49
    [Google Scholar]
  151. Renshon J 2015. Losing face and sinking costs: experimental evidence on the judgment of political and military leaders. Int. Organ. 69:659–95
    [Google Scholar]
  152. Renshon J, Lee JJ, Tingley D 2017. Emotions and the micro-foundations of commitment problems. Int. Organ. 71:S189–218
    [Google Scholar]
  153. Renshon J, Yarhi-Milo K, Kertzer JD 2016. Democratic leaders, crises and war: paired experiments on the Israeli Knesset and public Work. Pap., Harvard Univ Cambridge, MA:
  154. Rho S, Tomz M 2017. Why don't trade preferences reflect economic self-interest. ? Int. Organ. 71:S85–108
    [Google Scholar]
  155. Rosen SP 2005. War and Human Nature Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  156. Rosenau JN 1965. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: An Operational Formulation New York: Random House
  157. Rozenas A, Schutte S, Zhukov YM 2017. The political legacy of violence: the long-term impact of Stalin's repression in Ukraine. J. Politics 79:41147–61
    [Google Scholar]
  158. Sabet S 2014. Feelings first: non-material factors as moderators of economic self-interest effects on trade preferences Work. Pap., Harvard Univ Cambridge, MA:
  159. Saunders EN 2011. Leaders at War: How Presidents Shape Military Interventions Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  160. Schafer M, Walker SG 2006. Democratic leaders and the democratic peace: the operational codes of Tony Blair and Bill Clinton. Int. Stud. Q. 50:561–83
    [Google Scholar]
  161. Schwartz SH 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25 MP Zanna 1–65 San Diego, CA: Acad. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  162. Searcy WA, Nowicki S 2005. The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliablity and Deception in Signaling Systems Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  163. Sell A, Tooby J, Cosmides L 2009. Formidability and the logic of human anger. PNAS 106:15073–78
    [Google Scholar]
  164. Shannon VP, Keller JW 2007. Leadership style and international norm violation: the case of the Iraq War. Foreign Policy Anal 3:79–104
    [Google Scholar]
  165. Shannon VP, Kowert PA 2011. Psychology and Constructivism in International Relations: An Ideational Alliance Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  166. Sil R, Katzenstein PJ 2010. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  167. Snidal D 2002. Rational choice and international relations. Handbook of International Relations W Carlsnaes, T Risse, BA Simmons 73–94 London: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
  168. Snyder RC, Bruck H, Sapin B 1962. Decision-making as an approach to the study of international politics. Foreign Policy Decision-Making RC Snyder, H Bruck, B Sapin Glencoe, IL: Free Press
    [Google Scholar]
  169. Solomon T, Steele BJ 2017. Micro-moves in international relations theory. Eur. J. Int. Relat. 23:267–91
    [Google Scholar]
  170. Stein JG 1994. Political learning by doing: Gorbachev as uncommitted thinker and motivated learner. Int. Organ. 48:155–83
    [Google Scholar]
  171. Stein JG 2017. The micro-foundations of international relations theory: psychology and behavioral economics. Int. Organ. 71:S249–63
    [Google Scholar]
  172. Streich P, Levy JS 2016. Information, commitment, and the Russo-Japanese war of 1904–1905. Foreign Policy Anal 12:489–511
    [Google Scholar]
  173. Sumner WG 1906. Folkways Boston, MA: Ginn
  174. Sylvan DA, Voss JF 1998. Problem Representation in Foreign Policy Decision-Making Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press
  175. Thaler RH 2016. Behavioral economics: past, present, and future. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:1577–600
    [Google Scholar]
  176. Tingley D 2014. Face-off: facial features and strategic choice. Political Psychol 35:35–55
    [Google Scholar]
  177. Tingley D 2017. Rising power on the mind. Int. Organ. 71:S165–88
    [Google Scholar]
  178. Tingley DH 2011. The dark side of the future: an experimental test of commitment problems in bargaining. Int. Stud. Q. 55:521–44
    [Google Scholar]
  179. Tingley DH, Walter BF 2011.a Can cheap talk deter? An experimental analysis. J. Confl. Resolut. 55:996–1020
    [Google Scholar]
  180. Tingley DH, Walter BF 2011.b The effect of repeated play on reputation building: an experimental approach. Int. Organ. 65:343–65
    [Google Scholar]
  181. Tomz M 2007. Domestic audience costs in international relations: an experimental approach. Int. Organ. 61:821–40
    [Google Scholar]
  182. Trager RF, Vavreck L 2011. The political costs of crisis bargaining: presidential rhetoric and the role of party. Am. J. Political Sci. 55:526–45
    [Google Scholar]
  183. Turner ME, Pratkanis AR 1998. Twenty-five years of groupthink theory and research: lessons from the evaluation of a theory. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 73:105–15
    [Google Scholar]
  184. Van Aaken A 2014. Behavioral international law and economics. Harvard Int. Law J. 55:421–81
    [Google Scholar]
  185. Verba S 1961. Assumptions of rationality and non-rationality in models of the international system. World Politics 14:93–117
    [Google Scholar]
  186. Walker SG 1990. The evolution of operational code analysis. Political Psychol 11:403–18
    [Google Scholar]
  187. Wallace GP 2013. International law and public attitudes toward torture. Int. Organ. 67:105–40
    [Google Scholar]
  188. Waltz KN 1959. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  189. Waltz KN 1986. Reflections on theory of international politics: a response to my critics. Neorealism and Its Critics RO Keohane 322–45 New York: Columbia Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  190. Weeks JL 2014. Dictators at War and Peace Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  191. Wendt A 1999. Social Theory of International Politics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  192. Weyland K 2002. Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru and Venezuela Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  193. Wilson RK 2011. The contribution of behavioral economics to political science. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 14:201–23
    [Google Scholar]
  194. Wittkopf ER 1990. Faces of Internationalism: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  195. Wohl MJA, Van Bavel JJ 2011. Is identifying with a historically victimized group good or bad for your health? Transgenerational post-traumatic stress and collective victimization. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 41:818–24
    [Google Scholar]
  196. Wong SS 2016. Emotions and the communication of intentions in face-to-face diplomacy. Eur. J. Int. Relat. 22:144–67
    [Google Scholar]
  197. Yarhi-Milo K 2014. Knowing the Adversary: Leaders, Intelligence, and Assessment of Intentions in International Relations Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  198. Zeitzoff T 2014. Anger, exposure to violence, and intragroup conflict: a “lab in the field” experiment in southern Israel. Political Psychol 35:309–35
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041916-020042
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041916-020042
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error