Do Emerging Military Technologies Matter for International Politics?

Literature Cited

1. Altmann J, Sauer F. 2017. Autonomous weapon systems and strategic stability. Survival 59:117–42
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arquilla J, Ronfeldt D. 1993. Cyberwar is coming. ! Comp. Strategy 12:141–65
   [Google Scholar]
3. Biddle SD. 2004. Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
4. Boyle MJ. 2013. The costs and consequences of drone warfare. Int. Aff. 89:1–29
   [Google Scholar]
5. Byman D. 2013. Why drones work. Foreign Aff 92:32–43
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cronin AK. 2013. Why drones fail. Foreign Aff 92:44–54
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cummings ML. 2017. Artificial intelligence and the future of warfare Res. Pap Chatham House, Royal Inst. Int Aff., London, UK: https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/publications/research/2017-01-26-artificial-intelligence-future-warfare-cummings.pdf
8. Dolman EC. 2002. Astropolitik: Classical Geopolitics in the Space Age Portland, OR: Frank Cass
9. Dombrowski P, Demchak CC. 2014. Cyber war, cybered conflict, and the maritime domain. Naval War Coll. Rev. 67:70–96
   [Google Scholar]
10. Drezner DW. 2019. Technological change and international relations. Int. Relat. 33:286–303
    [Google Scholar]
11. Early BR. 2014. Exploring the final frontier: an empirical analysis of global civil space proliferation. Int. Stud. Q. 58:55–67
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fair CC, Kaltenthaler K, Miller WJ 2014. Pakistani opposition to American drone strikes. Political Sci. Q. 129:1–33
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fearon JD. 2018. Cooperation, conflict, and the costs of anarchy. Int. Organ. 72:523–59
    [Google Scholar]
14. Finnemore M, Hollis DB. 2016. Constructing norms for global cybersecurity. Am. J. Int. Law 110:425–79
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fuhrmann M, Horowitz MC. 2017. Droning on: explaining the proliferation of unmanned aerial vehicles. Int. Organ. 71:397–418
    [Google Scholar]
16. Garfinkel B, Dafoe A. 2019. How does the offense–defense balance scale. ? J. Strategic Stud. 42:736–63
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gartzke E, Jo D-J. 2007. Determinants of nuclear weapons proliferation: a quantitative model. J. Confl. Resolut. 51:167–94
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gartzke E, Lindsay JR. 2015. Weaving tangled webs: offense, defense, and deception in cyberspace. Secur. Stud. 24:316–48
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gartzke E, Lindsay JR. 2019. Cross-Domain Deterrence: Strategy in an Era of Complexity New York: Oxford Univ. Press
20. Gettinger D. 2019. The drone databook Cent. Stud. Drone, Bard College Annandale-on-Hudson, NY: https://dronecenter.bard.edu/projects/drone-proliferation/databook/
21. Gilli A, Gilli M. 2016. The diffusion of drone warfare? Industrial, organizational and infrastructural constraints: military innovations and the ecosystem challenge. Secur. Stud. 25:50–84
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gilli A, Gilli M. 2019. Why China has not caught up yet: military-technological superiority and the limits of imitation, reverse engineering, and cyber espionage. Int. Secur. 43:141–89
    [Google Scholar]
23. Horowitz MC. 2010. The Diffusion of Military Power: Causes and Consequences for International Politics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
24. Horowitz MC. 2016. Public opinion and the politics of the killer robots debate. Res. Politics 3:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
25. Horowitz MC. 2018. Artificial intelligence, international competition, and the balance of power. Texas Natl. Secur. Rev. 1:37–57
    [Google Scholar]
26. Horowitz MC, Kreps SE, Fuhrmann M 2016. Separating fact from fiction in the debate over drone proliferation. Int. Secur. 41:7–42
    [Google Scholar]
27. Horowitz MC, Kreps SE, Fuhrmann M 2019. Yes, Iran shot down a U.S. drone. Here's why you (still) don't need to worry. Washington Post/Monkey Cage Blog June 20. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/06/20/yes-iran-shot-down-us-drone-heres-why-you-still-dont-need-worry/
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hua J, Bapna S. 2013. The economic impact of cyber terrorism. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 22:175–86
    [Google Scholar]
29. Jensen BM, Whyte C, Cuomo S 2019. Algorithms at war: the promise, peril, and limits of artificial intelligence. Int. Stud. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz025
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
30. Jervis R. 1989. The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
31. Johnston PB. 2012. Does decapitation work? Assessing the effectiveness of leadership targeting in counterinsurgency campaigns. Int. Secur. 36:47–79
    [Google Scholar]
32. Johnston PB, Sarbahi AK. 2016. The impact of U.S. drone strikes on terrorism in Pakistan. Int. Stud. Q. 62:203–19
    [Google Scholar]
33. Jordan J. 2009. When heads roll: assessing the effectiveness of leadership decapitation. Secur. Stud. 18:719–55
    [Google Scholar]
34. Jordan J. 2014. Attacking the leader, missing the mark: why terrorist groups survive decapitation strikes. Int. Secur. 38:7–38
    [Google Scholar]
35. Junio TJ. 2013. How probable is cyber war? Bringing IR theory back in to the cyber conflict debate. J. Strateg. Stud. 36:125–33
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kello L. 2013. The meaning of the cyber revolution: perils to theory and statecraft. Int. Secur. 38:7–40
    [Google Scholar]
37. Kilcullen D, Exum A. 2009. Death from above, outrage down below. New York Times May 16. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/17/opinion/17exum.html
    [Google Scholar]
38. Koblentz GD. 2011. Living Weapons: Biological Warfare and International Security Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
39. Kostyuk N, Zhukov YM. 2019. Invisible digital front: Can cyber attacks shape battlefield events. ? J. Confl. Resolut. 63:317–47
    [Google Scholar]
40. Kreps SE. 2014. Flying under the radar: a study of public attitudes towards unmanned aerial vehicles. Res. Politics 1:1–7 https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168014536533
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
41. Kreps SE, Wallace GP. 2016. International law, military effectiveness, and public support for drone strikes. J. Peace Res. 53:830–44
    [Google Scholar]
42. Kroenig M. 2018. The Logic of American Nuclear Strategy: Why Strategic Superiority Matters New York: Oxford Univ. Press
43. Libicki MC. 2009. Cyberdeterrence and Cyberwar Washington, DC: RAND Corp.
44. Liff AP. 2012. Cyberwar: a new ‘absolute weapon’? The proliferation of cyberwarfare capabilities and interstate war. J. Strateg. Stud. 35:401–28
    [Google Scholar]
45. Lin H. 2012. Escalation dynamics and conflict termination in cyberspace. Strateg. Stud. Q. 6:46–70
    [Google Scholar]
46. Lindsay JR. 2013. Stuxnet and the limits of cyber warfare. Secur. Stud. 22:365–404
    [Google Scholar]
47. Lindsay JR. 2015. The impact of China on cybersecurity: fiction and friction. Int. Secur. 39:7–47
    [Google Scholar]
48. Mir A. 2018. What explains counterterrorism effectiveness? Evidence from the US drone war in Pakistan. Int. Secur. 43:45–83
    [Google Scholar]
49. Mir A, Moore D. 2019. Drones, surveillance, and violence: theory and evidence from a US drone program. Int. Stud. Q. 63:846–62
    [Google Scholar]
50. Nye JS Jr 2017. Deterrence and dissuasion in cyberspace. Int. Secur. 41:44–71
    [Google Scholar]
51. Panetta LE. 2012. Remarks by Secretary Panetta on cybersecurity to the Business Executives for National Security, New York City. Oct 11: https://archive.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=5136
    [Google Scholar]
52. Poznansky M, Perkoski E. 2018. Rethinking secrecy in cyberspace: the politics of voluntary attribution. J. Glob. Secur. Stud. 3:402–16
    [Google Scholar]
53. Rid T. 2012. Cyber war will not take place. J. Strateg. Stud. 35:5–32
    [Google Scholar]
54. Rid T. 2013. Cyber War Will Not Take Place New York: Oxford Univ. Press
55. Schelling TC. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
56. Schmitt MN. 2011. Cyber operations and the jud ad bellum revisited. Villanova Law Rev 56:569–606
    [Google Scholar]
57. Schneider J. 2019a. The capability/vulnerability paradox and military revolutions: implications for computing, cyber, and the onset of war. J. Strateg. Stud. 42:841–63
    [Google Scholar]
58. Schneider J. 2019b. Cyber and crisis escalation: insights from wargaming Work. Pap., Mario Einaudi Cent. Int. Stud., Cornell Univ https://pacs.einaudi.cornell.edu/sites/pacs/files/Schneider.Cyber%20and%20Crisis%20Escalation%20Insights%20from%20Wargaming%20Schneider%20for%20Cornell.10-12-17.pdf
59. Sechser TS, Fuhrmann M. 2017. Nuclear Weapons and Coercive Diplomacy New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
60. Sechser TS, Narang N, Talmadge C 2019. Emerging technologies and strategic stability in peacetime, crisis, and war. J. Strateg. Stud. 42:727–35
    [Google Scholar]
61. Shah A. 2018. Do U.S. drone strikes cause blowback? Evidence from Pakistan and beyond. Int. Secur. 42:47–84
    [Google Scholar]
62. Singh S, Way CR. 2004. The correlates of nuclear proliferation—a quantitative test. J. Confl. Resolut. 48:859–85
    [Google Scholar]
63. Slayton R. 2017. What is the cyber offense-defense balance? Conceptions, causes, and assessment. Int. Secur. 41:72–109
    [Google Scholar]
64. Smith M, Walsh JI. 2013. Do drone strikes degrade Al Qaeda? Evidence from propaganda output. Terrorism Political Violence 25:311–27
    [Google Scholar]
65. Spindel J. 2018. Beyond military power: the symbolic politics of conventional weapons transfers PhD Diss., Dep. Political Sci., Univ Minn:.
66. Talmadge C. 2019. Emerging technology and intra-war escalation risks: evidence from the Cold War, implications for today. J. Strateg. Stud. 42:864–87
    [Google Scholar]
67. Valeriano B, Jensen BM, Maness RC 2018. Cyber Strategy: The Evolving Character of Power and Coercion New York: Oxford Univ. Press
68. Valeriano B, Maness RC. 2015. Cyber War versus Cyber Realities: Cyber Conflict in the International System New York: Oxford Univ. Press
69. Volpe TA. 2019. Dual-use distinguishability: how 3D-printing shapes the security dilemma for nuclear programs. J. Strateg. Stud. 42:814–40
    [Google Scholar]
70. Walsh JI, Schulzke M. 2018. Drones and Support for the Use of Force Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
71. Williams H. 2019. Asymmetric arms control and strategic stability: scenarios for limiting hypersonic glide vehicles. J. Strateg. Stud. 42:789–813
    [Google Scholar]
72. Zegart A. 2018. Cheap fights, credible threats: the future of armed drones and coercion. J. Strateg. Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2018.1439747
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]