1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 23, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 23, 2020

Studying Leaders and Elites: The Personal Biography Approach

Abstract

The last two decades have seen a revival in work that takes the role of individual leaders and elites seriously. This article surveys new research that explores how biographical factors influence their behavior. We call this literature the personal biography approach to political leadership. Our survey first lays out four mechanisms through which biographical characteristics might affect leader behavior. We then discuss the main findings, grouping them according to socializing experiences (e.g., education, military service, and prior occupation) and ascriptive traits (e.g., gender, race, and ethnicity). We also consider the methodological problems, especially endogeneity and selection effects, that pose challenges to this style of research. We conclude with an assessment of gaps in the literature and provide suggestions for future work in the biographical vein.

Keyword(s): biography, education, elites, ethnicity, gender, leaders, military, occupation, race
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032801
2020-05-11
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/23/1/annurev-polisci-050718-032801.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032801&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adolph C. 2013. Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics: The Myth of Neutrality New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  2. Alexiadou D. 2016. Ideologues, Partisans, and Loyalists: Ministers and Policymaking in Parliamentary Cabinets New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  3. Angrist JD, Pischke JS. 2010. The credibility revolution in empirical economics: how better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. J. Econ. Perspect. 24:23–30
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Anzia SF, Berry CR. 2011. The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson effect: Why do congresswomen outperform congressmen. ? Am. J. Political Sci. 55:3478–93
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Balz J. 2010. Ready to lead on day one: predicting presidential greatness from political experience. PS: Political Sci. Politics 43:3487–92
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Barceló J. 2018. Are western-educated leaders less prone to initiate militarized disputes?. Br. J. Political Sci 50:2535–66
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Barnes TD. 2016. Gendering Legislative Behavior: Institutional Constraints and Collaboration New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  8. Baturo A. 2017. Democracy, development, and career trajectories of former political leaders. Comp. Political Stud. 50:81023–1054
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Baturo A, Elkink JA. 2014. Office or officeholder? Regime deinstitutionalization and sources of individual political influence. J. Politics 76:3859–72
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Beach B, Jones DB. 2017. Gridlock: ethnic diversity in government and the provision of public goods. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 9:1112–36
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bertoli A, Dafoe A, Trager RF 2019. Is there a war party? Party change, the left-right divide, and international conflict. J. Confl. Resolut. 63:4950–75
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Besley T, Folke O, Persson T, Rickne J 2017. Gender quotas and the crisis of the mediocre man: theory and evidence from Sweden. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:82204–42
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Besley T, Montalvo JG, Reynal-Querol M 2011. Do educated leaders matter?. Econ. J. 121:554205–27
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bhalotra S, Clots-Figueras I, Cassan G, Iyer L 2013. Religion, politician identity, and development outcomes: evidence from India. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 104:c4–17
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Brollo F, Troiano U. 2016. What happens when a woman wins an election? Evidence from close races in Brazil. J. Dev. Econ. 122:C28–45
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Broockman DE. 2013. Black politicians are more intrinsically motivated to advance blacks’ interests: a field experiment manipulating political incentives. Am. J. Political Sci. 57:3521–36
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Burden BC. 2007. The Personal Roots of Representation Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  18. Burgess R, Jedwab R, Miguel E, Morjaria A, Padró i Miquel G 2015. The value of democracy: evidence from road building in Kenya. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:61817–51
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Butler DM, Broockman DE. 2011. Do politicians racially discriminate against their constituents? A field experiment on state legislators. Am. J. Political Sci. 55:3463–77
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Carnes N. 2013. White-Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  21. Carnes N, Hansen E. 2016. Does paying politicians more promote economic diversity in legislatures?. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 110:4699–716
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Carnes N, Lupu N. 2015. Rethinking the comparative perspective on class and representation: evidence from Latin America. Am. J. Political Sci. 59:11–18
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Carnes N, Lupu N. 2016. What good is a college degree? Education and leader quality reconsidered. J. Politics 78:135–49
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Carnes N, Sadin ML. 2015. The “mill worker's son” heuristic: how voters perceive politicians from working-class families—and how they really behave in office. J. Politics 77:1285–98
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E. 2004. Women as policy makers: evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica 72:51409–43
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Childs S, Krook ML. 2008. Critical mass theory and women's political representation. Political Stud 56:3725–36
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Chiozza G, Goemans HE. 2004. International conflict and the tenure of leaders: is war still “ex post” inefficient?. Am. J. Political Sci. 48:3604–19
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Chwieroth J. 2007. Neoliberal economists and capital account liberalization in emerging markets. Int. Organ. 61:2443–63
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Chwieroth J. 2010. Shrinking the state: neoliberal economists and social spending in Latin America. Constructing the International Economy R Abdelal, M Blyth, C Parsons 23–46 Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Clots-Figueras I. 2011. Women in politics: evidence from the Indian states. J. Public Econ. 95:7–8664–90
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Cunningham KG, Sawyer K. 2019. Conflict negotiations and rebel leader selection. J. Peace Res. 56:5619–34
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Dal Bó E, Finan F 2018. Progress and perspectives in the study of political selection. Annu. Rev. Econ. 10:1541–75
     [Google Scholar]
  33. De Luca GD, Hodler R, Raschky PA, Valsecchi M 2018. Ethnic favoritism: an axiom of politics?. J. Dev. Econ. 132:115–29
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Diaz-Serrano L, Pérez J. 2013. Do more educated leaders raise citizens’ educations? IZA Discuss. Pap. 7661, Inst. Stud. Labor (IZA) Bonn, Ger:.
  35. Dreher A, Lamla MJ, Lein SM, Somogyi F 2009. The impact of political leaders’ profession and education on reforms. J. Comp. Econ. 37:1169–93
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Dube O, Harish SP. 2020. Queens. J. Political Econ. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Edwards Smith L, Olson LR, Fine JA 2010. Substantive religious representation in the U.S. Senate: voting alignment with the Family Research Council. Political Res. Q. 63:168–82
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Efobi U. 2015. Politicians’ attributes and institutional quality in Africa: a focus on corruption. J. Econ. Issues 49:3787–813
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Ellis CM. 2018. If leaders really do matter, which life experiences count? A case for the systematic study of childhood. Int. Hist. Politics Newsl. 3:110–14
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Ferreira F, Gyourko J. 2014. Does gender matter for political leadership? The case of U.S. mayors. J. Pub. Econ. 112:24–39
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Flores TE, Lloyd G, Nooruddin I 2013. The technocratic advantage? Leadership and IMF programs Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association San Francisco, CA:
  42. Franck R, Rainer I. 2012. Does the leader's ethnicity matter? Ethnic favoritism, education and health in sub-Saharan Africa. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 106:2294–325
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Fuhrmann M. 2020. When do leaders free-ride? Business experience and contributions to collective defense. Am. J. Political Sci. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Fuhrmann M, Horowitz MC. 2015. When leaders matter: rebel experience and nuclear proliferation. J. Politics 77:172–87
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Garrow D. 2000. Mental decrepitude on the U.S. Supreme Court: the historical case for a 28th amendment. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 67:996–1087
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Gartzke E, Rohner D. 2011. The political economy of imperialism, decolonization and development. Br. J. Political Sci. 41:3525–56
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Gelpi C, Feaver PD. 2002. Speak softly and carry a big stick? Veterans in the political elite and the American use of force. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 96:4779–93
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Gerring J, Oncel E, Morrison K, Pemstein D 2019. Who rules the world? A portrait of the global leadership class. Perspect. Politics 17:41079–97
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Gift T, Krcmaric D. 2017. Who democratizes? Western-educated leaders and regime transitions. J. Confl. Resolut. 61:3671–701
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Göhlmann S, Vaubel R. 2007. The educational and occupational background of central bankers and its effect on inflation: an empirical analysis. Eur. Econ. Rev. 51:4925–41
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Grose C. 2011. Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation in Washington and at Home New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  52. Grumbach J. 2015. Does the American dream matter for members of Congress? Social class backgrounds and roll-call votes. Political Res. Q. 68:2306–23
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Hall AB. 2019. Who Wants to Run? How the Devaluing of Political Office Drives Polarization Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  54. Hansen E, Carnes N, Gray V 2019. What happens when insurers make the insurance laws? State legislative agendas and the occupational makeup of government. State Politics Policy Q 19:2155–79
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Hayo B, Neumeier F. 2016. Political leaders’ socioeconomic background and public budget deficits: evidence from OECD countries. Econ. Politics 28:155–78
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Hira A. 2007. Should economists rule the world? Trends and implications of leadership patterns in the developing world, 1960–2005. Int. Political Sci. Rev. 28:3325–60
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Hodler R, Raschky PA. 2014. Regional favoritism. Q. J. Econ. 129:2995–1033
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Hopkins DJ, McCabe KT. 2012. After it's too late: estimating the policy impacts of black mayoralties in U.S. cities. Am. Politics Res. 40:4665–700
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Horowitz MC, Stam AC, Ellis CM 2015. Why Leaders Fight New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  60. Hughes MM, Paxton P, Krook ML 2017. Gender quotas for legislatures and corporate boards. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 43:331–52
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Jablonski RS. 2014. How aid targets votes: the impact of electoral incentives on foreign aid distribution. World Politics 66:2293–330
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Jennings MK, Markus GB. 1977. The effect of military service on political attitudes: a panel study. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 71:1131–47
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Jervis R. 2017. How Statesmen Think: The Psychology of International Politics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  64. Jochimsen B, Thomasius S. 2014. The perfect finance minister: whom to appoint as finance minister to balance the budget. Eur. J. Political Econ. 34:390–408
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Jones BF, Olken BA. 2005. Do leaders matter? National leadership and growth since World War II. Q. J. Econ. 120:3835–64
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Kaplan SB. 2018. Fighting past economic wars: crisis and austerity in Latin America. Lat. Am. Res. Rev. 53:119–37
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Kasara K. 2007. Tax me if you can: ethnic geography, democracy and the taxation of agriculture in Africa. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 101:1159–72
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Kertzer JD, Tingley D. 2018. Political psychology in international relations: beyond the paradigms. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 21:1319–39
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Koch MT, Fulton SA. 2011. In the defense of women: gender, office holding, and national security policy in established democracies. J. Politics 73:11–16
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Kopkin N. 2017. Substantive black political representation: evidence from matching estimates in the United States House of Representatives. Rev. Black Political Econ. 44:3203–32
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Kramon E, Posner DN. 2013. Who benefits from distributive politics? How the outcome one studies affects the answer one gets. Perspect. Politics 11:2461–74
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Lawless J. 2012. Becoming a Candidate: Political Ambition and the Decision to Run for Office New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  73. Leites N. 1951. The Operational Code of the Politburo New York: McGraw-Hill
  74. Lupton DL. 2017. Out of the service, into the House: military experience and congressional war oversight. Political Res. Q. 70:2327–39
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Macdonald JA, O'Brien EE. 2011. Quasi-experimental design, constituency, and advancing women's interests: reexamining the influence of gender on substantive representation. Political Res. Q. 64:2472–86
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Matter U, Stutzer A. 2015. The role of lawyer-legislators in shaping the law: evidence from voting on tort reforms. J. Law Econ. 58:2357–84
     [Google Scholar]
  77. McClendon G. 2016. Race and responsiveness: a field experiment with South African politicians. J. Exp. Political Sci. 3:160–74
     [Google Scholar]
  78. McDermott R. 2007. Presidential Illness, Leadership, and Decisionmaking New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  79. Meyersson E. 2014. Islamic rule and the empowerment of the poor and pious. Econometrica 82:1229–69
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Nelson SC. 2017. The Currency of Confidence: How Shared Beliefs Shape the IMF's Relationship with Its Borrowers Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  81. Nye JVC, Rainer I, Stratmann T 2015. Do black mayors improve black relative to white employment outcomes? Evidence from large U.S. cities. J. Law Econ. Organ. 31:2383–430
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Pande R. 2003. Can mandated political representation increase policy influence for disadvantaged minorities? Theory and evidence from India. Am. Econ. Rev. 93:41132–51
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Paxton P, Hughes MM. 2016. Women, Politics, and Power: A Global Perspective Washington, DC: CQ Press
  84. Poole KT. 2007. Changing minds? Not in Congress!. Public Choice 131:3–4435–51
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Potter PBK. 2007. Does experience matter? American presidential experience, age, and international conflict. J. Confl. Resolut. 51:3351–78
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Putnam RD. 1976. The Comparative Study of Political Elites Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
  87. Ramey AJ, Klingler JD, Hollibaugh GE Jr 2017. More Than a Feeling: Personality, Polarization, and the Transformation of the US Congress Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  88. Reynolds A. 2013. Representation and rights: the impact of LGBT legislators in comparative perspective. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 107:2259–74
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Saunders E. 2009. Transformative choices: leaders and the origins of intervention strategy. Int. Secur. 34:2119–61
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Saunders E. 2017. No substitute for experience: presidents, advisers, and information in group decision making. Int. Organ. 71:S1219–47
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Schwindt-Bayer LA. 2006. Still supermadres? Gender and the policy priorities of Latin American legislators. Am. J. Political Sci. 50:3570–85
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Sen M, Wasow O. 2016. Race as a bundle of sticks: designs that estimate the effect of seemingly immutable characteristics. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 19:499–522
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Simon AM, Uscinski JE. 2012. Prior experience predicts presidential performance. Pres. Stud. Q. 42:3514–48
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Swers ML. 2013. Women in the Club: Gender and Policy Making in the Senate Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  95. Szakonyi D. 2020. Private sector policymaking: business background and politicians’ behavior in office. J. Politics In press
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Tate K. 2004. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and Their Representatives in the U.S. Congress Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  97. Todorov A. 2017. Face Value: The Irresistible Influence of First Impressions Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  98. Volden C, Wiseman AE. 2014. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress: The Lawmakers New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  99. Volden C, Wiseman AE, Wittmer DE 2018. Women's issues and their fates in the US Congress. Political Sci. Res. Meth. 6:4679–96
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Washington E. 2008. Female socialization: how daughters affect their legislator fathers’ voting on women's issues. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:1311–32
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Witko C, Friedman S. 2008. Business backgrounds and congressional behavior. Congr. Pres. J. Cap. Stud. 35:171–86
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Wolford S. 2007. The turnover trap: new leaders, reputation, and international conflict. Am. J. Political Sci. 51:4772–88
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Yu S, Jong-A-Pin R. 2016. Political leader survival: Does competence matter?. Public Choice 166:1113–42
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032801
Loading
Studying Leaders and Elites: The Personal Biography Approach
Annual Review of Political Science 23, 133 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032801
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032801
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032801
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error