1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 25, 2022
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 25, 2022

Comparative Politics in Borderlands: Actors, Identities, and Strategies

Abstract

Comparativists are increasingly researching national border regions. Yet the distinct way in which proximity to borders independently shapes politics is rarely theorized explicitly. Drawing on the emerging subdiscipline of border studies, we identify three types of border effects: Borders involve specific actors, shape local identities, and provide distinct strategies, each of which directly affects key areas of comparative politics. An in-depth review of work on political violence and state formation shows that specifying these effects () demands that comparativists consider the ways in which borderlands differ from other regions and be careful in attributing processes found there to nations as a whole, () improves theories by elucidating scope conditions, and () scrutinizes the validity of our research designs and measurement strategies. We end with a call to move from a comparative politics border regions to a comparative politics border regions that contextualizes how borders alter political processes.

Keyword(s): borders, comparative politics, political violence, state formation
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-010103
2022-05-12
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/25/1/annurev-polisci-051120-010103.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-010103&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abdelal R, Herrera YM, Johnston AI, McDermott R. 2006. Identity as a variable. Perspect. Politics 4:695–711
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Abramson SF, Carter DS. 2016. The historical origins of territorial disputes. Am. Political Sci. Rev 110:675–98
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Allport G. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice Boston: Addison-Wesley
  4. Andreas P 2012. Border Games: Policing the U.S.-Mexico Divide Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  5. Asiwaju A. 1993. Borderlands in Africa: a comparative research perspective with particular reference to Western Europe. J. Borderl. Stud 8:1–12
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Balcells L. 2017. Rivalry and Revenge Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  7. Barth F 2012. Boundaries and connections. Signifying Identities A Cohen 25–44 Abingdon, UK: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Baud M, Van Schendel W. 1997. Toward a comparative history of borderlands. J. World Hist 8:211–42
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Beath A, Christia F, Enikolopov R 2013. Winning hearts and minds through development: evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Chicago:
  10. Braun R. 2022. Bloodlines: border crossings and antisemitism in Weimar Germany before the Holocaust. Am. Sociol. Rev 87201–33
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown W. 2010. Walled States, Waning Sovereignty Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  12. Brubaker R. 1996. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  13. Buhaug H, Gates S, Lujala P 2009. Geography, rebel capability, and the duration of civil conflict. J. Confl. Resolut 53:544–69
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Castañeda Dower P, Finkel E, Gehlbach S, Nafziger S 2018. Collective action and representation in autocracies: evidence from Russia's great reforms. Am. Political Sci. Rev 112:125–47
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Cramsey SA, Wittenberg J. 2016. Timing is everything: changing norms of minority rights and the making of a Polish nation-state. Comp. Political Stud 49:1480–512
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dancygier RM, Laitin DD. 2014. Immigration into Europe: economic discrimination, violence, and public policy. Annu. Rev. Political Sci 17:43–64
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Das V, Poole D. 2004. Anthropology in the Margins: Comparative Ethnographies Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press
  18. Depetris-Chauvin E, Ozak O. 2020. Borderline disorder: (de facto) historical ethnic borders and contemporary conflict in Africa IZA Discuss. Pap. 13736 Inst. Labor Econ. Bonn, Ger:.
  19. Elcioglu E. 2020. Divided by the Wall: Progressive and Conservative Immigration Politics at the U.S.-Mexico Border Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  20. Gallant TW. 1999. Brigandage, piracy, capitalism, and state-formation: transnational crime from a historical world-systems perspective. States and Illegal Practices JM Heyman 25–62 Oxford, UK: Berg
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Giraudy A, Moncada E, Snyder R 2019. Inside Countries: Subnational Research in Comparative Politics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  22. Hangartner D, Dinas E, Marbach M, Matakos K, Xefteris D 2019. Does exposure to the refugee crisis make natives more hostile?. Am. Political Sci. Rev 113:442–55
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hassan M. 2020. Regime Threats and State Solutions: Bureaucratic Loyalty and Embeddedness in Kenya Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  24. Herbst J. 2000. States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  25. Hirschman A. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  26. Idler A. 2019. Borderland Battles: Violence, Crime, and Governance at the Edges of Colombia's War Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  27. Judson P 2006. Guardians of the Nation: Activists on the Language Frontiers of Imperial Austria Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  28. Kalyvas SN. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  29. Keele LJ, Titiunik R. 2015. Geographic boundaries as regression discontinuities. Political Anal 23:127–55
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kersting F, Wohnsiedler I, Wolf N 2020. Weber revisited: the Protestant ethic and the spirit of nationalism. J. Econ. Hist 80:710–45
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Kocher MA, Monteiro NP. 2016. Lines of demarcation: causation, design-based inference, and historical research. Perspect. Politics 14:952–75
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kopstein J, Wittenberg J. 2018. Intimate Violence: Anti-Jewish Pogroms on the Eve of the Holocaust Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  33. Korf B, Raeymaekers T. 2013. Violence on the Margins: States, Conflict, and Borderlands New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  34. Landry PF. 2008. Decentralized Authoritarianism in China: The Communist Party's Control of Local Elites in the Post-Mao Era Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  35. Laven D, Baycroft T. 2008. Border regions and identity. Eur. Rev. Hist 15:255–75
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Lewis JI. 2020. How Insurgency Begins: Rebel Group Formation in Uganda and Beyond Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  37. Lipset SM. 1971. Agrarian Socialism: The Cooperative Commonwealth Federation in Saskatchewan: A Study in Political Sociology Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  38. Lipset SM. 1981. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  39. MacLean LM. 2010. Informal Institutions and Citizenship in Rural Africa: Risk and Reciprocity in Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  40. Mann M. 2005. The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  41. Martinez OJ. 1994. Border People: Life and Society in the U.S.-Mexico Borderlands Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press
  42. McCauley JF, Posner DN. 2015. African borders as sources of natural experiments: promise and pitfalls. Political Sci. Res. Methods 3:409–18
     [Google Scholar]
  43. McNamee L. 2018. Mass resettlement and political violence: evidence from Rwanda. World Politics 70:595–644
     [Google Scholar]
  44. McNamee L, Zhang A. 2019. Demographic engineering and international conflict: evidence from China and the former USSR. Int. Organ 73:291–327
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Miles WFS. 1994. Hausaland Divided: Colonialism and Independence in Nigeria and Niger Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  46. Minghi J. 1963. Boundary studies in political geography. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr 53:407–28
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Mitchell T. 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  48. Moraski B, Reisinger WM. 2017. The Regional Roots of Russia's Political Regime Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  49. Murdock C. 2010. Changing Places: Society, Culture, and Territory in the Saxon-Bohemian Borderlands, 1870–1946 Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  50. Nugent P. 2019. Boundaries, Communities and State-Making in West Africa: The Centrality of the Margins Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  51. Ostermann SL. 2016. Rule of law against the odds: overcoming poverty and the high cost of compliance in the developing world. Law Policy 38:101–23
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Paik C, Vechbanyongratana J. 2019. Path to centralization and development: evidence from Siam. World Politics 71:289–331
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Peisakhin L 2015. Cultural legacies: persistence and transmission. The Political Economy of Governance: Institutions, Political Performance and Elections N Schofield, G Caballero 21–39 Cham, Switz: Springer Int.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Posner DN. 2005. Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  55. Robinson AL. 2014. National versus ethnic identification in Africa: modernization, colonial legacy, and the origins of territorial nationalism. World Politics 66:709–46
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Sahlins P. 1989. Boundaries: The Making of France and Spain in the Pyrenees Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  57. Salehyan I. 2009. Rebels Without Borders: Transnational Insurgencies in World Politics Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  58. Schultz KA. 2015. Borders, conflict, and trade. Annu. Rev. Political Sci 18:125–45
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Scott JC. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  60. Sellers JM. 2019. From within to between nations: subnational comparison across borders. Perspect. Politics 17:85–105
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Sexton R. 2016. Aid as a tool against insurgency: evidence from contested and controlled territory in Afghanistan. Am. Political Sci. Rev 110:731–49
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Simmons B. 2019. Border rules. Int. Stud. Rev 21:256–83
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Simpser A, Slater D, Wittenberg J. 2018. Dead but not gone: contemporary legacies of communism, imperialism, and authoritarianism. Annu. Rev. Political Sci 21:419–39
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Soifer H. 2015. State Building in Latin America Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  65. Tiebout CM. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. J. Political Econ 64:416–24
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Tilly C. 1992. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992 Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. , Revis. ed..
  67. Torpey J. 2018. The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  68. Trejo G, Ley S. 2020. Votes, Drugs, and Violence: The Political Logic of Criminal Wars in Mexico Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  69. Turner FJ. 1920. The Frontier in American History New York: Holt
  70. Van Schendel W 2005. Spaces of engagement: how borderlands, illegal flows, and territorial states interlock. Illicit Flows and Criminal Things: States, Borders, and the Other Side of Globalization W Van Schendel, I Abraham 38–68 Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Vogler JP. 2019. Imperial rule, the imposition of bureaucratic institutions, and their long-term legacies. World Politics 71:806–63
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Weber M. 2011. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press. Revis. , 1920 ed..
  73. Wilfahrt M. 2021. Precolonial Legacies in Postcolonial Politics: Representation and Redistribution in Decentralized West Africa Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  74. Wilkinson S. 2006. Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  75. Wilson TM, Donnan H. 1998. Border Identities: Nation and State at International Frontiers Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  76. Yashar DJ. 2018. Homicidal Ecologies: Illicit Economies and Complicit States in Latin America Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  77. Zartman IW. 2010. Understanding Life in the Borderlands: Boundaries in Depth and in Motion Athens: Univ. Ga. Press
  78. Zhou YY, Shaver A. 2021. Reexamining the effect of refugees on civil conflict: a global subnational analysis. Am. Political Sci. Rev 115:1175–96
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-010103
Loading
Comparative Politics in Borderlands: Actors, Identities, and Strategies
Annual Review of Political Science 25, 303 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-010103
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-010103
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-010103
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error