1932

Abstract

The political problems of democratic legitimacy related to the construction of the European Union have mutated deeply during the crisis. The survival of the Eurozone has exacted a high toll on democratic principles. National representative democracy has been weakened due to the imperatives of economic integration. The technocratic elements of European integration (independent agencies, binding rules on economic matters) have expanded dramatically in scope. In the past, the technocratic dimension was circumscribed to efficiency-enhancing policies; during the crisis, it has been extended to issues with clear distributional consequences (such as the burden of adjustment between debtor and creditor countries). The resulting paradox is that in a time of growing “politicization” of European affairs, the technocratic bias of the European Union has “depoliticized” economic issues. This article reviews the recent debates about the tension between technocracy and democracy in the context of European supranational integration.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061915-110623
2017-05-11
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/20/1/annurev-polisci-061915-110623.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061915-110623&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adolph C. 2013. Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  2. Alonso S. 2014. ‘You can vote but you cannot choose’: democracy and the sovereign debt crisis in the Eurozone Work. Pap. 282, Carlos III–Juan March Inst. Social Sci. https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/bitstream/handle/10016/18315/IC3JM-2014-282.pdf?sequence=3
  3. Bellamy R. 2010. Democracy without democracy? Can the EU's democratic ‘outputs’ be separated from the democratic ‘inputs’ provided by competitive parties and majority rule. ? J. Eur. Public Policy 17:12–19 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bibow J. 2013. At the crossroads: the euro and its central bank guardian (and saviour?). Cambridge J. Econ. 37:609–26 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blyth M. 2013. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  6. Bourdieu P. 2002. Against the policy of depoliticization. Stud. Polit. Econ. 69:31–41 [Google Scholar]
  7. Braun D, Tausendpfund M. 2014. The impact of the euro crisis on citizens’ support for the European Union. J. Eur. Integr. 36:3231–5 [Google Scholar]
  8. Caplan B. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  9. Centeno M. 1993. The new Leviathan: the dynamics and limits of technocracy. Theory Soc 22:3307–35 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheneval F, Schimmelfennig F. 2013. The case for demoicracy in the European Union. J. Common Market Stud. 51:2334–50 [Google Scholar]
  11. Clements B, Nanou K, Verney S. 2014. ‘We no longer love you, but we don't want to leave you’: the Eurozone crisis and popular Euroscepticism in Greece. J. Eur. Integr. 36:3247–65 [Google Scholar]
  12. Copelovitch M, Frieden J, Walker S. 2016. The political economy of the euro crisis. Comp. Polit. Stud. 49:7811–40 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cremme O, Hobolt SB. 2015. Democratic Politics in a European Union under Stress Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  14. Crum B. 2013. Saving the euro at the cost of democracy?. J. Common Market Stud. 51:4614–30 [Google Scholar]
  15. De Grauwe P. 2011. The governance of a fragile Eurozone CEPS work. doc. 346. Cent. Eur. Policy Stud. https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/book/2011/05/WD%20346%20De%20Grauwe%20on%20Eurozone%20Governance.pdf
  16. De Grauwe P. 2013. The political economy of the euro. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 16:153–70 [Google Scholar]
  17. De Vries CE, Edwards EE. 2009. Taking Europe to its extremes: extremist parties and public euroscepticism. Party Polit 15:15–28 [Google Scholar]
  18. Elster J, Slagstad R. 1993. Constitutionalism and Democracy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  19. Estlund D. 2008. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  20. Featherstone K. 1994. Jean Monnet and the ‘democratic deficit’ in the European Union. J. Common Market Stud. 32:2149–70 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fernández-Albertos J. 2015. The politics of central bank independence. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 18:217–37 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fishman RM. 2014. Democracy and markets: notes on a twenty-first-century paradox. Reflections on Uneven Democracies: The Legacy of Guillermo O'Donnell D Brinks, M Leiras, S Mainwaring 106–20 Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  23. Fishman RM. 2016. Rethinking dimensions of democracy for empirical analysis: authenticity, quality, depth, and consolidation. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 19:289–309 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fligstein N, Polyakova A, Sandholtz W. 2012. European integration, nationalism and European identity. J. Common Market Stud. 50:1106–22 [Google Scholar]
  25. Follesdal A, Hix S. 2006. Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: a response to Majone and Moravcsik. J. Common Market Stud. 44:3533–62 [Google Scholar]
  26. Grande E, Kriesi H. 2015. The Europeanization of the national political debate. See Cremme & Hobolt 2015 67–86
  27. Habermas J. 2015. The Lure of Technocracy Cambridge, UK: Polity
  28. Hall PA. 2014. Varieties of capitalism and the euro crisis. West Eur. Polit. 37:61223–43 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hewitt G. 2013. The Lost Continent: Europe's Darkest Hour Since World War Two London: Hodder & Stoughton
  30. Hix S. 2015. Democratizing a macroeconomic union in Europe. See Cremme & Hobolt 2015 180–98
  31. Hix S, Høyland B. 2013. Empowering the European Parliament. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 16:171–89 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hix S, Marsh M. 2011. Second-order effects plus pan-European political swings: an analysis. Elect. Stud. 30:14–15 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hobolt SB. 2015. Public attitudes towards the euro crisis. See Cremme & Hobolt 2015 48–66
  34. Hobolt SB, De Vries C. 2016. Turning against the union? The impact of the crisis on the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European Parliament elections. Elect. Stud. 44:504–14 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hobolt SB, Wratil C. 2015. Public opinion and the crisis: the dynamics of support for the euro. J. Eur. Public Policy 22:2238–56 [Google Scholar]
  36. Holmes S. 1997. Passions and Constraints: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  37. Hooghe L, Marks G. 2009. A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 39:11–23 [Google Scholar]
  38. Howarth D, Loedel P. 2003. The European Central Bank: The New European Leviathan? Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
  39. Iversen T, Soskice D, Hope D. 2016. The Eurozone and political economic institutions. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 19:163–85 [Google Scholar]
  40. Johnston A, Hancké B, Pant S. 2014. Comparative institutional advantage in the European sovereign debt crisis. Comp. Polit. Stud. 47:131771–800 [Google Scholar]
  41. Koopmans R. 2015. How advanced is the Europeanization of public spheres? Comparing German and European structures of political communication. European Public Spheres T Risse 53–83 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  42. Lohmann S. 1998. Federalism and central bank independence: the politics of German monetary policy, 1957–92. World Polit 50:3401–46 [Google Scholar]
  43. Mackie G. 2004. Democracy Defended Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  44. Mackie G. 2009. Schumpeter's leadership democracy. Polit. Theory 37:1128–53 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mair P. 2007. Political opposition and the European Union. Gov. Opposition 41:11–17 [Google Scholar]
  46. Mair P. 2013. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing-Out of Western Democracy London: Verso
  47. Majone G. 1996. Regulating Europe London: Routledge
  48. Majone G. 1998. Europe's ‘democratic deficit’: the question of standards. Eur. Law J. 4:15–28 [Google Scholar]
  49. Majone G. 2014. Rethinking the Union of Europe Post-Crisis: Has Integration Gone Too Far? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  50. Marsh D. 1992. The Most Powerful Bank: Inside Germany's Bundesbank New York: Random House
  51. Marsh D. 2011. The Euro: The Battle for the New Global Currency New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 2nd ed..
  52. McNamara KR. 2015. The forgotten problem of embeddedness: history lessons for the euro. The Future of the Euro M Matthijs, M Blyth 21–43 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  53. Menéndez AJ. 2013. The existential crisis of the European Union. Ger. Law J. 14:05453–526 [Google Scholar]
  54. Moodie JR, Holst C. 2014. For the sake of democracy? The European Commission's justification for democratising expertise. Expertise and Democracy C Holst 293–321 Oslo: ARENA Report 1/14 [Google Scholar]
  55. Moravcsik A. 1998. The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  56. Moravcsik A. 2002. In defence of the ‘democratic deficit’: reassessing the legitimacy of the European Union. J. Common Market Stud. 40:4603–24 [Google Scholar]
  57. Moravcsik A. 2012. Europe after the crisis. Foreign Aff 91:354–68 [Google Scholar]
  58. Newman M. 1996. Democracy, Sovereignty and the European Union London: Hurst
  59. Nicolaïdis K. 2013. European demoicracy and its crisis. J. Common Market Stud. 51:2351–69 [Google Scholar]
  60. Offe C. 2015. Europe Entrapped Cambridge, UK: Polity
  61. Pettit P. 2004. Depoliticizing democracy. Ratio Juris 17:152–65 [Google Scholar]
  62. Pisani-Ferry J. 2011. The Euro-Crisis and Its Aftermath Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  63. Radaelli CM. 1999. Technocracy in the European Union London: Longman
  64. Reiff K, Schmitt H. 1980. Nine second-order national elections. a conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 8:13–44 [Google Scholar]
  65. Riker W. 1982. Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice San Francisco: W.H. Freeman
  66. Risse T. 2015. European Public Spheres Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  67. Rodríguez-Aguilera del Prat C. 2015. El déficit democrático europeo Madrid: Catarata
  68. Rodríguez Zapatero JL. 2013. El dilemma. 600 días de vértigo. Barcelona: Planeta
  69. Rodrik D. 2011. The Globalization Paradox: Why Global Markets, States, and Democracy Can't Coexist Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  70. Rodrik D. 2016. Brexit and the globalization trilemma. Dani Rodrik's Weblog Jun. 13. http://rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2016/06/brexit-and-the-globalization-trilemma.html [Google Scholar]
  71. Roth F, Gros D, Nowak-Lehmann DF. 2014. Crisis and citizens’ trust in the European Central Bank—panel data evidence for the euro area, 1999–2012. J. Eur. Integr. 36:3303–20 [Google Scholar]
  72. Sánchez-Cuenca I. 2001. The political basis of support for European integration. Eur. Union Polit. 1:2147–71 [Google Scholar]
  73. Sánchez-Cuenca I. 2014. La impotencia democrática Madrid: Catarata
  74. Sandbu M. 2015. European Orphans: The Future of the Euro and the Politics of Debt Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  75. Scharpf F. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  76. Scharpf F. 2015. Political legitimacy in a non-optimal currency. See Cremme & Hobolt 2015 19–47
  77. Schimmelfennig F. 2014. European integration in the euro crisis: the limits of postfunctionalism. J. Eur. Integr. 36:3321–37 [Google Scholar]
  78. Schmidt V. 2013. Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: input, output and ‘throughput’. Polit. Stud. 61:12–22 [Google Scholar]
  79. Schmitter PC. 2000. How to Democratize the European Union…And Why Bother? Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
  80. Serricchio F, Tsakatika M, Quaglia L. 2013. Euroscepticism and the global financial crisis. J. Common Market Stud. 51:151–64 [Google Scholar]
  81. Siedentop L. 2001. Democracy in Europe New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  82. Sinn H-W. 2014. The Euro-Trap. On Bursting Bubbles, Budgets, and Beliefs. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  83. Somek A. 2015. Delegation and authority: authoritarian liberalism today. Eur. Law J. 21:3340–60 [Google Scholar]
  84. Streeck W. 2014. Buying Time. The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism London: Verso
  85. Streeck W. 2015. Heller, Schmitt, and the euro. Eur. Law J. 21:3361–70 [Google Scholar]
  86. Treib O. 2014. The voter says no, but nobody listens: causes and consequences of the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European elections. J. Eur. Public Policy 21:101541–54 [Google Scholar]
  87. Tsebelis G. 2002. Veto Players. How Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  88. Verdun A, Christiansen T. 2000. Policies, institutions, and the euro: dilemmas of legitimacy. After the Euro: Shaping Institutions for Governance in the Wake of European Monetary Union C Crouch 162–78 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  89. Weiler JHH. 1999. The Constitution of Europe: “Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor” and Other Essays on European Integration Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  90. Weiler JHH, Ulrich RH, Mayer FC. 1995. European democracy and its critique. West Eur. Polit. 18:34–39 [Google Scholar]
  91. Wolf M. 2014. The Shifts and the Shocks: What We've Learned—and Have Still to Learn—from the Financial Crisis New York: Penguin
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061915-110623
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error