1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Psychology
  4. Volume 71, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Psychology

Volume 71, 2020

Implicit Social Cognition

Abstract

In the last 20 years, research on implicit social cognition has established that social judgments and behavior are guided by attitudes and stereotypes of which the actor may lack awareness. Research using the methods of implicit social cognition has produced the concept of implicit bias, which has generated wide attention not only in social, clinical, and developmental psychology, but also in disciplines outside of psychology, including business, law, criminal justice, medicine, education, and political science. Although this rapidly growing body of research offers prospects of useful societal applications, the theory needed to confidently guide those applications remains insufficiently developed. This article describes the methods that have been developed, the findings that have been obtained, and the theoretical questions that remain to be answered.

Keyword(s): evaluative priming, Implicit Association Test, implicit bias, implicit social cognition, implicit–explicit relationships, indirect measures
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050837
2020-01-04
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/71/1/annurev-psych-010419-050837.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050837&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Agosta S, Sartori G. 2013. The autobiographical IAT: a review. Front. Psychol. 4:519
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. 1977. Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol. Bull. 84:5888–918
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Banaji MR. 2001. Implicit attitudes can be measured. The Nature of Remembering: Essays in Honor of Robert G. Crowder HL Roediger, JS Nairne 117–50 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Banse R, Seise J, Zerbes N 2001. Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Z. Exp. Psychol. 48:2145–60
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bar-Anan Y, Nosek BA. 2014. A comparative investigation of seven indirect attitude measures. Behav. Res. Methods 46:668–88
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bargh JA. 1994. The four horsemen of automaticity: awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. Handbook of Social Cognition, Vol. 1:Basic Processes RS Wyer Jr., TK Srull 1–40 Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bargh JA. 1999. The cognitive monster: the case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology S Chaiken, Y Trope 361–82 New York: Guilford Press
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bargh JA, Chen M, Burrows L 1996. Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71:2230–44
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Barnes-Holmes D, Barnes-Holmes Y, Power P, Hayden E, Milne R, Stewart I 2006. Do you really know what you believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. Irish Psychol 32:7169–77
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bezrukova K, Spell CS, Perry JL, Jehn KA 2016. A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation. Psychol. Bull. 142:111227–74
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Blair IV. 2002. The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 6:3242–61
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Blair IV, Banaji MR. 1996. Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70:61142–63
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bluemke M, Friese M. 2008. Reliability and validity of the Single-Target IAT (ST-IAT): assessing automatic affect towards multiple attitude objects. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 38:6977–97
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cai H, Sriram N, Greenwald AG, McFarland SG 2004. The Implicit Association Test's D measure can minimize a cognitive skill confound: comment on McFarland and Crouch 2002. Soc. Cogn. 22:6673–84
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Cameron CD, Brown-Iannuzzi JL, Payne BK 2012. Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition: a meta-analysis of associations with behavior and explicit attitudes. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 16:4330–50
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Campion MA, Pursell ED, Brown BK 1988. Structured interviewing: raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview. Pers. Psychol. 41:125–42
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Carnes M, Devine PG, Manwell LB, Byars-Winston A, Fine E et al. 2015. The effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Acad. Med. 90:2221–30
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen M, Bargh JA. 1999. Consequences of automatic evaluation: immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 25:215–24
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Conrey FR, Sherman JW, Gawronski B, Hugenberg K, Groom CJ 2005. Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: the Quad model of implicit task performance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89:469–87
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. 1955. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol. Bull. 52:4281–302
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Cunningham WA, Preacher KJ, Banaji MR 2001. Implicit attitude measures: consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychol. Sci. 12:163–70
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Cvencek D, Greenwald AG, Brown AS, Gray NS, Snowden RJ 2010. Faking of the Implicit Association Test is statistically detectable and partly correctable. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 32:302–14
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Cvencek D, Greenwald AG, Meltzoff AN 2016. Implicit measures for preschool children confirm self-esteem's role in maintaining a balanced identity. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 62:50–57
     [Google Scholar]
  24. De Houwer J. 2003. The extrinsic affective Simon task. Exp. Psychol. 50:277–85
     [Google Scholar]
  25. De Houwer J, Teige-Mocigemba S, Spruyt A, Moors A 2009. Implicit measures: a normative analysis and review. Psychol. Bull. 135:347–68
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Devine PG. 1989. Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56:15–18
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Devine PG, Forscher PS, Cox WTL, Kaatz A, Sheridan J, Carnes M 2017. A gender bias habit-breaking intervention led to increased hiring of female faculty in STEMM departments. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 73:211–15
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Dobbin F, Schrage D, Kalev A 2015. Rage against the iron cage: the varied effects of bureaucratic personnel reforms on diversity. Am. Sociol. Rev. 80:51014–44
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Donders FC. 1969. 1868. Over de snelheid van psychische processen [On the speed of mental processes], transl. WG Koster. Attention and Performance II WG Koster 412–31 Amsterdam, Neth: North Holland
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Fazio RH. 1990. Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: the MODE model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology MP Zanna 265–343 San Diego, CA: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Fazio RH, Olson MA. 2003. Implicit measures in social cognition research: their meaning and uses. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54:297–327
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Fazio RH, Sanbonmatsu DM, Powell MC, Kardes FR 1986. On the automatic activation of attitudes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50:229–38
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Freeman JB, Ambady N. 2010. MouseTracker: software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behav. Res. Methods 42:1226–41
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Gawronski B, Bodenhausen GV. 2006. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychol. Bull. 132:692–731
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Gawronski B, De Houwer J 2014. Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology HT Reis, CM Judd 283–310 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Gawronski B, Payne BK, eds. 2010. Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications New York: Guilford PressComprehensive edited volume reviewing findings and theories across the domain of implicit social cognition.
  37. Gawronski B, Sritharan R. 2010. Formation, change, and contextualization of mental associations. See Gawronski & Payne 2010 216–40
  38. Goldin C, Rouse C. 2000. Orchestrating impartiality: the impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Am. Econ. Rev. 90:715–41
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Graf P, Schacter DL. 1985. Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 11:501–18
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Greenberg J, Solomon S, Pyszczynski T, Rosenblatt A, Burling J et al. 1992. Why do people need self-esteem? Converging evidence that self-esteem serves an anxiety-buffering function. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63:913–22
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Greenwald AG, Banaji MR. 1995. Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol. Rev. 102:4–27
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Greenwald AG, Banaji MR. 2017. The implicit revolution: reconceiving the relation between conscious and unconscious. Am. Psychol. 72:861–71Describes the changing understanding of the relation between conscious and unconscious cognition in the past half century.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Greenwald AG, Banaji MR, Rudman LA, Farnham SD, Nosek BA, Mellott DS 2002. A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychol. Rev. 109:3–25Theory that predicts observed affective-cognitive consistency among attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and identities.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the Implicit Association Test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74:1464–80
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR 2003. Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85:197–216
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR, Klauer KC 2005. Validity of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the IAT: comment on Rothermund and Wentura 2004. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 134:420–25
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Greenwald AG, Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, Banaji MR 2009. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 97:17–41
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Hahn A, Gawronski B. 2018. Implicit social cognition. In The Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 4 JT Wixted 395–427 New York: Wiley. , 4th ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Hahn A, Gawronski B. 2019. Facing one's implicit biases: from awareness to acknowledgment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 116:769–94
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Hahn A, Judd CM, Hirsh HK, Blair IV 2014. Awareness of implicit attitudes. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143:31369–92
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Hart M. 2005. Subjective decisionmaking and unconscious discrimination. Ala. Law Rev. 56:741–91
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Hedges LV, Tipton E, Johnson MC 2010. Robust variance estimation in meta‐regression with dependent effect size estimates. Res. Synth. Methods 1:139–65
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Heider F. 1946. Attitudes and cognitive organization. J. Psychol. 21:107–12
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Heider F. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations New York: Wiley
  55. Heilman ME, Haynes MC. 2008. Subjectivity in the appraisal process: a facilitator of gender bias in work settings. Beyond Common Sense: Psychological Science in the Courtroom E Borgida, ST Fiske 127–56 Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Hofmann W, Gawronski B, Gschwendner T, Le H, Schmitt M 2005a. A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 31:1369–85
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Ito TA, Friedman NP, Bartholow BD, Correll J, Loersch C et al. 2015. Toward a comprehensive understanding of executive cognitive function in implicit racial bias. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 108:2187–218
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Jacoby LL. 1991. A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. J. Mem. Lang. 30:513–41
     [Google Scholar]
  59. James W. 1890. The Principles of Psychology Vol. 2 New York: Henry Holt & Co.
  60. Jordan CH, Spencer SJ, Zanna MP, Hoshino-Browne E, Correll J 2003. Secure and defensive high self-esteem. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85:969–78
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Jung CG. 1910. The association method. Am. J. Psychol. 21:219–69
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Kalev A, Dobbin F, Kelly E 2006. Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71:589–617Review using Equal Employment Opportunity Commission data to appraise the effectiveness of corporate strategies for improving diversity in hiring.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Karpinski A, Steinman RB. 2006. The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91:116–32
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Kim D-Y. 2003. Voluntary controllability of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Soc. Psychol. Q. 66:83–96
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Klauer KC, Voss A, Schmitz F, Teige-Mocigemba S 2007. Process components of the Implicit Association Test: a diffusion-model analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 93:3353–68
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Kurdi B, Seitchik AE, Axt JR, Carroll TJ, Karapetyan A et al. 2018. Relationship between the Implicit Association Test and intergroup behavior: a meta-analysis. Am. Psychol. 74:5569–86
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Lai CK, Hoffman KM, Nosek BA 2013. Reducing implicit prejudice. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 7:5315–30
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Lai CK, Marini M, Lehr SA, Cerruti C, Shin J-EL et al. 2014. Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143:1765–85Series of large-scale experiments comparing 17 interventions to reduce implicit racial preferences.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Lai CK, Skinner AL, Cooley E, Murrar S, Brauer M et al. 2016. Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 145:81001–16
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Maass A, Salvi D, Arcuri L, Semin GR 1989. Language use in intergroup contexts: the linguistic intergroup bias. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57:6981–93
     [Google Scholar]
  71. MacCallum RC, Austin JT. 2000. Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51:201–26
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Macrae CN, Bodenhausen GV, Milne AB, Jetten J 1994. Out of mind but back in sight: stereotypes on the rebound. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67:5808–17
     [Google Scholar]
  73. McNulty JK, Olson MA, Jones RE, Acosta LM 2017. Automatic associations between one's partner and one's affect as the proximal mechanism of change in relationship satisfaction: evidence from evaluative conditioning. Psychol. Sci. 28:81031–40
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Meissner F, Rothermund K. 2013. Estimating the contributions of associations and recoding in the Implicit Association Test: the ReAL model for the IAT. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 104:45–69
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Meyer DE, Schvaneveldt RW. 1971. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. J. Exp. Psychol. 90:2227–34
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Mierke J, Klauer KC. 2001. Implicit association measurement with the IAT: evidence for effects of executive control processes. Z. Exp. Psychol. 48:2107–22
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Mierke J, Klauer KC. 2003. Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85:61180–92
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Mogg K, Bradley BP, Field M, De Houwer J 2003. Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence. Addiction 98:825–36
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Moors A, De Houwer J 2006. Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychol. Bull. 132:2297–326
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Morgan CD, Murray HA. 1935. A method for investigating fantasies: the thematic apperception test. Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry 34:289–306
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Nock MK, Park JM, Finn CT, Deliberto TL, Dour HJ, Banaji MR 2010. Measuring the suicidal mind: Implicit cognition predicts suicidal behavior. Psychol. Sci. 21:4511–17Validation of an indirect (IAT) measure in predicting the likelihood of a repeat suicide attempt.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Nosek BA. 2005. Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 134:4565–84
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Nosek BA, Banaji MR. 2001. The go/no-go association task. Soc. Cogn. 19:6625–66
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Nosek BA, Banaji MR, Greenwald AG 2002. Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83:44–59Demonstration of math–gender stereotypes’ role in reducing women's association of math with self.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Nosek BA, Bar-Anan Y, Sriram N, Axt J, Greenwald AG 2014. Understanding and using the Brief Implicit Association Test: recommended scoring procedures. PLOS ONE 9:12e110938
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Nosek BA, Hansen JJ. 2008. The associations in our heads belong to us: searching for attitudes and knowledge in implicit evaluation. Cogn. Emot. 22:553–94
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Nosek BA, Hawkins CB, Frazier RS 2011. Implicit social cognition: from measures to mechanisms. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15:4152–59
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Nosek BA, Hawkins CB, Frazier RS 2012. Implicit social cognition. Handbook of Social Cognition S Fiske, CN Macrae 31–53 New York: Sage
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Nosek BA, Smyth FL, Hansen JJ, Devos T, Lindner NM et al. 2007. Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 18:36–88Study that summarizes data from 2.5 million completed IATs involving 17 topics.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Nunnally J, Bernstein I. 1994. Psychometric Theory New York: McGraw-Hill. , 3rd ed..
  91. Nuttin JM Jr 1985. Narcissism beyond Gestalt and awareness: the name letter effect. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 15:3353–61
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Olson MA, Fazio RH. 2004. Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: personalizing the IAT. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86:653–67
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Oswald FL, Mitchell G, Blanton H, Jaccard J, Tetlock PE 2013. Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: a meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 105:2171–92
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Paluck EL, Green DP. 2009. Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60:339–67
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Payne BK, Cheng CM, Govorun O, Stewart BD 2005. An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89:3277–93
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Payne BK, Gawronski B. 2010. A history of implicit social cognition. See Gawronski & Payne 2010 1–15
  97. Payne BK, Vuletich HA, Lundberg KB 2017. The bias of crowds: how implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychol. Inq. 28:4233–48
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Ratcliff R, Gomez P, McKoon G 2004. A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychol. Rev. 111:1159–82
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Reingold EM, Merikle PM. 1988. Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness. Percept. Psychophys. 44:563–75
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Rinck M, Becker ES. 2007. Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 38:2105–20
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Rogers CR. 1959. A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In Psychology: A Study of a Science, Vol. 3 S Koch 184–256 New York: McGraw-Hill
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Rothermund K, Teige-Mocigemba S, Gast A, Wentura D 2009. Minimizing the influence of recoding in the implicit association test: the Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF). Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 62:84–98
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Rothermund K, Wentura D. 2004. Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test: dissociating salience from associations. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 133:139–65
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Rudman LA, Greenwald AG, McGhee DE 2001. Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: Self and ingroup share desirable traits. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27:1164–78
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Schacter DL. 1987. Implicit memory: history and current status. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 13:501–18
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Schröder-Abé M, Rudolph A, Schütz A 2007. High implicit self-esteem is not necessarily advantageous: discrepancies between explicit and implicit self-esteem and their relationship with anger expression and psychological health. Eur. J. Pers. 21:319–39
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Sekaquaptewa D, Espinoza P, Thompson M, Vargas P, von Hippel W 2003. Stereotypic explanatory bias: implicit stereotyping as a predictor of discrimination. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 39:175–82
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Shook NJ, Fazio RH. 2008. Interracial roommate relationships: an experimental field test of the contact hypothesis. Psychol. Sci. 19:7717–23
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Sloman SA. 1996. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 119:13–22
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Smeijers D, Vrijsen JN, van Oostrom I, Isaac L, Speckens A et al. 2017. Implicit and explicit self-esteem in remitted depressed patients. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 54:301–6
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Smith ER, DeCoster J. 2000. Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 4:2108–31
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Spencer SJ, Steele CM, Quinn DM 1999. Stereotype threat and women's math performance. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35:14–28
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Sriram N, Greenwald AG. 2009. The brief implicit association test. Exp. Psychol. 56:4283–94
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Stanovich KE, West RF, Toplak ME 2014. Rationality, intelligence, and the defining features of Type 1 and Type 2 processing. Dual-Process Theories of the Social Mind JW Sherman, B Gawronski, Y Trope 80–91 New York: Guilford PressReview of the wide variety of dual-construct theories in social and cognitive psychology.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Strack F, Deutsch R. 2004. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 8:3220–47
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Stroop JR. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. 18:6643–62
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Tajfel H, Billig MG, Bundy RF, Flament C 1971. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. Eur. J. Psychol. 1:149–77
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Teige-Mocigemba S, Klauer KC, Rothermund K 2008. Minimizing method-specific variance in the IAT: a Single Block IAT. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 24:4237–45
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell
  120. Uhlmann EL, Cohen GL. 2005. Constructed criteria: redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychol. Sci. 16:474–80
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Wilson TD, Lindsey S, Schooler TY 2000. A model of dual attitudes. Psychol. Rev. 107:1101–26
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Wittenbrink B, Judd CM, Park B 1997. Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72:2262–74
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Yamaguchi S, Greenwald AG, Banaji MR, Murakami F, Chen D et al. 2007. Apparent universality of positive implicit self-esteem. Psychol. Sci. 18:498–500
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050837
Loading
Implicit Social Cognition
Annual Review of Psychology 71, 419 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050837
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050837
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050837
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Data

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error