1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Psychology
  4. Volume 66, 2015
  5. Article

Annual Review of Psychology

Volume 66, 2015

Action Errors, Error Management, and Learning in Organizations

Abstract

Every organization is confronted with errors. Most errors are corrected easily, but some may lead to negative consequences. Organizations often focus on error prevention as a single strategy for dealing with errors. Our review suggests that error prevention needs to be supplemented by error management—an approach directed at effectively dealing with errors after they have occurred, with the goal of minimizing negative and maximizing positive error consequences (examples of the latter are learning and innovations). After defining errors and related concepts, we review research on error-related processes affected by error management (error detection, damage control). Empirical evidence on positive effects of error management in individuals and organizations is then discussed, along with emotional, motivational, cognitive, and behavioral pathways of these effects. Learning from errors is central, but like other positive consequences, learning occurs under certain circumstances—one being the development of a mind-set of acceptance of human error.

Keyword(s): error management, errors, innovation, mistakes, violations
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015205
2015-01-03
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/66/1/annurev-psych-010814-015205.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015205&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Allwood CM. 1984. Error detection processes in statistical problem solving. Cogn. Sci. 8:413–37 [Google Scholar]
  2. Argote L, Miron-Spektor E. 2011. Organizational learning: from experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22:1123–37 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baer M, Frese M. 2003. Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J. Organ. Behav. 24:45–68 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker T, Nelson RE. 2005. Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Adm. Sci. Q. 50:329–66 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell BS, Kozlowski SWJ. 2008. Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:296–316 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bell BS, Kozlowski SWJ. 2011. Collective failure: the emergence, consequences, and management of errors in teams. See Hofmann & Frese 2011a 113–42
  7. Beus JM, Payne SC, Bergman ME, Arthur WJ. 2010. Safety climate and injuries: an examination of theoretical and empirical relationships. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:713–27 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bledow R, Frese M, Anderson NR, Erez M, Farr JL. 2009. A dialectical perspective on innovation: conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 2:305–37 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bode C, Wagner SM, Petersen KJ, Ellram LM. 2011. Understanding responses to supply chain disruptions: insights from information processing and resource dependence perspectives. Acad. Manag. J. 54:833–56 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cannon MD, Edmondson AC. 2005. Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently). Long Range Plan. 38:299–319 [Google Scholar]
  11. Carmeli A, Gittell JH. 2009. High-quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. J. Organ. Behav. 30:709–29 [Google Scholar]
  12. Carter M, Beier ME. 2010. The effectiveness of error management training with working-aged adults. Pers. Psychol. 63:641–75 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chang YK, Mark B. 2011. Moderating effects of learning climate on the impact of RN staffing on medication errors. Nurs. Res. 60:32–39 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cullen MJ, Muros JP, Rasch R, Sackett PR. 2013. Individual differences in the effectiveness of error management training for developing negotiation skills. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 21:1–21 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dahlin KB, Weingart LR, Hinds PJ. 2005. Team diversity and information use. Acad. Manag. J. 48:1107–23 [Google Scholar]
  16. Debowski S, Wood RE, Bandura A. 2001. Impact of guided exploration and enactive exploration on self-regulatory mechanisms and information acquisition through electronic search. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:1129–41 [Google Scholar]
  17. Deichman D, van den Ende J. 2014. Rising from failure and learning from success: the role of past experience in radical initiative taking. Organ. Sci. 25:670–90 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dörner D. 1996. The Logic of Failure Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
  19. Economist 1999. Innovation: a survey (special section). Feb. 20, pp 1–28
  20. Edmondson AC, Lei Z. 2014. Psychological safety: the history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1:23–43 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ellis A, Ellis DJ. 2014. Rational emotive behavior therapy. Psychotherapy Theories and Techniques: A Reader GR VandenBos, E Meidenbauer, J Frank-McNeil 289–98 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ellis S, Carette B, Anseel F, Lievens F. 2014. Systematic reflection: implications for learning from failures and successes. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23:67–72 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ellis S, Davidi I. 2005. After-event reviews: drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:857–71 [Google Scholar]
  24. Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Christ S, Hohnsbein J. 2000. ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial. Biol. Psychol. 51:87–107 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fay D, Frese M. 2001. The concept of personal initiative: an overview of validity studies. Hum. Perform. 14:97–124 [Google Scholar]
  26. Fehr R, Gelfand MJ, Nag M. 2010. The road to forgiveness: a meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychol. Bull. 136:894–914 [Google Scholar]
  27. Festinger L. 1983. The Human Legacy New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  28. Folkman S, Moskowitz J. 2004. Coping: pitfalls and promise. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55:745–74 [Google Scholar]
  29. Frese M. 1991. Error management or error prevention: two strategies to deal with errors in software design. Human Aspects in Computing: Design and Use of Interactive Systems and Work with Terminals H-J Bullinger 776–82 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  30. Frese M, Brodbeck FC, Heinbokel T, Mooser C, Schleiffenbaum E, Thiemann P. 1991. Errors in training computer skills: on the positive function of errors. Hum. Comput. Interact. 6:77–93 [Google Scholar]
  31. Frese M, Zapf D. 1994. Action as the core of work psychology: a German approach. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology HC Triandis, MD Dunnette, L Hough 271–340 Palo Alto, CA: Consult. Psychol. Press [Google Scholar]
  32. Freud S. 1914. Psychopathology of Everyday Life. Frankfurt, Ger.: Fischer /London: Fisher Unwin
  33. Fruhen LS, Keith N. 2014. Team cohesion and error culture in risky work environments. Safety Sci. 65:20–27 [Google Scholar]
  34. Gold A, Gronewold U, Salterio SE. 2014. Error management in audit firms: error climate, type, and originator. Account. Rev. 89:303–30 [Google Scholar]
  35. Goodman PS, Ramanujam R, Carroll JS, Edmondson AC, Hofmann DA, Sutcliffe KM. 2011. Organizational errors: directions for future research. Res. Organ. Behav. 31:151–76 [Google Scholar]
  36. Gronewold U, Donle M. 2011. Organizational error climate and auditors' predispositions toward handling errors. Behav. Res. Account. 23:69–92 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hajcak G, Foti D. 2008. Errors are aversive: defensive motivation and the error-related negativity. Psychol. Sci. 19:103–8 [Google Scholar]
  38. Heimbeck D, Frese M, Sonnentag S, Keith N. 2003. Integrating errors into the training process: the function of error management instructions and the role of goal orientation. Pers. Psychol. 56:333–62 [Google Scholar]
  39. Higgins ET. 2012. Regulatory focus theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology 1 PM Van Lange, AW Kruglanski, E Higgins 483–504 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  40. Hockey GJ, Earle F. 2006. Control over the scheduling of simulated office work reduces the impact of workload on mental fatigue and task performance. J. Exp. Psychol.: Appl. 12:50–65 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hofmann DA, Frese M. 2011a. Errors in Organizations. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis
  42. Hofmann DA, Frese M. 2011b. Errors, error taxonomies, error prevention, and error management: laying the groundwork for discussing errors in organizations. See Hofmann & Frese 2011a 1–44
  43. Hofmann DA, Mark B. 2006. An investigation of the relationship between safety climate and medication errors as well as other nurses and patient outcomes. Pers. Psychol. 59:847–70 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hofmann DA, Stetzer A. 1998. The role of safety climate and communication in accident interpretation: implications for learning from negative events. Acad. Manag. J. 41:644–57 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hollenbeck JR, Ilgen DR, Tuttle DB, Sego DJ. 1995. Team performance on monitoring tasks: an examination of decision errors in contexts requiring sustained attention. J. Appl. Psychol. 80:685–96 [Google Scholar]
  46. Hollnagel E. 2011. When things go wrong: failures as the flip sides of successes. See Hofmann & Frese 2011a 225–44
  47. Homsma GJ, van Dyck C, De Gilder D, Koopman PL, Elfring T. 2009. Learning from error: the influence of error incident characteristics. J. Bus. Res. 62:115–22 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ivancic K, Hesketh B. 2000. Learning from errors in a driving simulation: effects on driving skill and self-confidence. Ergonomics 43:1966–84 [Google Scholar]
  49. Joung W, Hesketh B, Neal A. 2006. Using “war stories” to train for adaptive performance: Is it better to learn from error or success?. Appl. Psychol. 55:282–302 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kanki B, Helmreich R, Anca J. 2010. Crew Resource Management San Diego, CA: Academic
  51. Katz-Navon T, Naveh E, Stern Z. 2005. Safety climate in health care organizations: a multidimensional approach. Acad. Manag. J. 48:1075–89 [Google Scholar]
  52. Kazén M, Kaschel R, Kuhl J. 2008. Individual differences in intention initiation under demanding conditions: interactive effects of state versus action orientation and enactment difficulty. J. Res. Pers. 42:693–715 [Google Scholar]
  53. Keith N. 2011. Learning through errors in training. See Hofmann & Frese 2011a 45–66
  54. Keith N, Frese M. 2005. Self-regulation in error management training: emotion control and metacognition as mediators of performance effects. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:677–91 [Google Scholar]
  55. Keith N, Frese M. 2008. Performance effects of error management training: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:59–69 [Google Scholar]
  56. Keith N, Frese M. 2011. Enhancing firm performance and innovativeness through error management culture. The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate NM Ashkanasy, CPM Wilderom, MF Peterson 137–57 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  57. Keith N, Richter T, Naumann J. 2010. Active/exploratory training promotes transfer even in learners with low motivation and cognitive ability. Appl. Psychol. 59:97–123 [Google Scholar]
  58. Kim PH, Ferrin DL, Cooper CD, Dirks KT. 2004. Removing the shadow of suspicion: the effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. J. Appl. Psychol. 89:104–18 [Google Scholar]
  59. Klahr D, Simon HA. 1999. Studies of scientific discovery: complementary approaches and convergent findings. Psychol. Bull. 125:524–43 [Google Scholar]
  60. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. 2000. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  61. Kozlowski SWJ, Ilgen DR. 2006. Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 7:377–124 [Google Scholar]
  62. Kraiger K. 2002. Creating, Implementing, and Managing Effective Training and Development San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
  63. Lawton R. 1998. Not working to rule: understanding procedural violations at work. Saf. Sci. 28:77–95 [Google Scholar]
  64. Lee F, Peterson C, Tiedens LA. 2004. Mea culpa: predicting stock prices from organizational attributions. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 30:1636–49 [Google Scholar]
  65. Li Y, Johnson K, Cohen A, Williams M, Knowles E, Chen Z. 2012. Fundamental(ist) attribution error: Protestants are dispositionally focused. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102:281–90 [Google Scholar]
  66. Loh V, Andrews S, Hesketh B, Griffin B. 2013. The moderating effect of individual differences in error-management training: Who learns from mistakes. Hum. Factors 55:435–48 [Google Scholar]
  67. Madsen PM, Desai VM. 2010. Failing to learn? The effects of failure and success on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle industry. Acad. Manag. J. 53:451–76 [Google Scholar]
  68. Mangels JA, Butterfield B, Lamb J, Good C, Dweck CS. 2006. Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 1:75–86 [Google Scholar]
  69. Mark BA, Hughes LC, Belyea M, Chang YK, Hofmann DA. et al. 2007. Does safety climate moderate the influence of staffing adequacy and work conditions on nurse injuries?. J. Saf. Res. 38:431–46 [Google Scholar]
  70. McDonald CJ, Weiner M, Hui SL. 2000. Deaths due to medical errors are exaggerated in the Institute of Medicine report. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 284:93–95 [Google Scholar]
  71. Milanovich DM, Driskell JE, Stout RJ, Salas E. 1998. Status and cockpit dynamics: a review and empirical study. Group Dyn. 2:155–67 [Google Scholar]
  72. Mousavi S, Gigerenzer G. 2011. Revisiting the “error” in studies of cognitive errors. See Hofmann & Frese 2011a 97–112
  73. Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA. 2011. Predicting safety performance: a meta-analysis of safety and organizational constructs. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:71–94 [Google Scholar]
  74. Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC. 2012. Psychological safety. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship KS Cameron, GM Spreitzer 490–503 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  75. Noordzij G, van Hooft EAJ, van Mierlo H, Van Dam A, Born MP. 2013. The effects of a learning-goal orientation training on self-regulation: a field experiment among unemployed job seekers. Pers. Psychol. 66:723–55 [Google Scholar]
  76. Oberauer K, Kliegl R. 2006. A formal model of capacity limits in working memory. J. Mem. Lang. 55:601–26 [Google Scholar]
  77. Oldham GR, Hackman JR. 2010. Not what it was and not what it will be: the future of job design research. J. Organ. Behav. 31:463–79 [Google Scholar]
  78. Ovsiankina M. 1928. Die Wiederaufnahme unterbrochener Handlungen [Continuation of actions that were interrupted]. Psychol. Forsch. 11:301–79 [Google Scholar]
  79. Palmer JK, Feldman JM. 2005. Accountability and need for cognition effects on contrast, halo, and accuracy in performance ratings. J. Psychol. 139:119–37 [Google Scholar]
  80. Payne SC, Youngcourt SS, Beaubien JM. 2007. A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:128–50 [Google Scholar]
  81. Pruemper J, Heinbokel T, Küting HJ. 1993. Virtuelle Prototypen als Werkzeuge zur benutzerzentrierten Produktentwicklung. Anwendung einer handlungstheoretischen Fehlertaxonomie auf reale und simulierte Oberflächen von Waschmaschinen. Z. Arbeitswissenschaft 4:160–67 [Google Scholar]
  82. Pruemper J, Zapf D, Brodbeck FC, Frese M. 1992. Errors of novices and experts: some surprising differences between novice and expert errors in computerized office work. Behav. Inform. Technol. 11:319–28 [Google Scholar]
  83. Putz D, Schilling J, Kluge A, Stangenberg C. 2012. Measuring organizational learning from errors: development and validation of an integrated model and questionnaire. Manag. Learn. 44:511–36 [Google Scholar]
  84. Rabbitt P. 1978. Detection of errors by skilled typists. Ergonomics 21:945–58 [Google Scholar]
  85. Ramanujam R, Goodman PS. 2011. The link between organizational errors and adverse consequences: the role of error-correcting and error-amplifying feedback processes. See Hofmann & Frese 2011a 245–72
  86. Rasmussen J, Duncan K, Leplat J. 1987. New Technology and Human Error Chichester: UK: Wiley
  87. Reason J. 1990. Human Error New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  88. Reason J. 1997. Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents Aldershot, UK: Ashgate
  89. Reason J. 2005. Safety in the operating theatre—Part 2: human error and organisational failure. Q. Saf. Health Care 14:56–60 [Google Scholar]
  90. Reason J, Manstead A, Stradling S, Baxter J, Campbell K. 1990. Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction. Ergonomics 33:1315–32 [Google Scholar]
  91. Reason J, Parker D, Lawton R. 1998. Organizational controls and safety: the varieties of rule-related behaviour. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 71:289–304 [Google Scholar]
  92. Robledo IC, Hester KS, Peterson DR, Barrett JD, Day EA. et al. 2012. Errors and understanding: the effects of error-management training on creative problem-solving. Creativity Res. J. 24:220–34 [Google Scholar]
  93. Roese NJ, Vohs KD. 2012. Hindsight bias. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7:411–26 [Google Scholar]
  94. Rybowiak V, Garst H, Frese M, Batinic B. 1999. Error Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ): reliability, validity, and different language equivalence. J. Organ. Behav. 20:527–47 [Google Scholar]
  95. Salas E, Suffler ML, Xavier LF. 2010. The design, delivery and evaluation of crew resource management training. Crew Resource Management BD Kanki, RL Helmreich, J Anca 205–32 San Diego, CA: Academic [Google Scholar]
  96. Salas E, Wilson KA, Burke CS, Wightman DC. 2006. Does crew resource management training work? An update, an extension, and some critical needs. Hum. Factors 48:392–412 [Google Scholar]
  97. Sasou K, Reason J. 1999. Team errors: definition and taxonomy. Reliability Eng. Syst. Saf. 65:1–9 [Google Scholar]
  98. Scheel T, Hausmann U. 2013. Impact of error management culture on knowledge performance in professional service firms. Psihološka Obzorja/Horiz. Psychol. 22:66–79 [Google Scholar]
  99. Shepherd D, Patzelt H, Wolfe M. 2011. Moving forward from project failure: negative emotions, affective commitment, and learning from experience. Acad. Manag. J. 54:1229–59 [Google Scholar]
  100. Shimizu K, Hitt MA. 2011. Errors at the top of the hierarchy. See Hofmann & Frese 2011a 199–224
  101. Simon HA. 1990. Invariants of human behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 41:1–19 [Google Scholar]
  102. Simonton DK. 2003. Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: the integration of product, person, and process perspective. Psychol. Bull. 129:475–94 [Google Scholar]
  103. Sitkin SB. 1992. Learning through failure: the strategy of small losses. Res. Organ. Behav. 14:231–66 [Google Scholar]
  104. Skinner BF. 1953. Science and Human Behavior New York: Free Press
  105. Smallwood J. 2013. Distinguishing how from why the mind wanders: a process-occurrence framework for self-generated mental activity. Psychol. Bull. 139:519–35 [Google Scholar]
  106. Thomas MJW. 2004. Predictors of threat and error management: identification of core nontechnical skills and implications for training systems design. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 14:207–31 [Google Scholar]
  107. Tjosvold D, Yu Z, Hu C. 2004. Team learning from mistakes: the contribution of cooperative goals and problem-solving. J. Manag. Stud. 41:1223–45 [Google Scholar]
  108. Toepfer A. 2014. Nicht bestandener “Elch-Test” der A-Klasse von Daimler-Benz im Herbst 1997 [“Elk test” not passed by A-class of Daimler-Benz in Autumn 1997]. Kiel, Germany: Krisennavigator. http://www.krisennavigator.de/Nicht-bestandener-Elch-Test-der-A-Klasse-von-Daimler-Benz-im-Herbst-1997.162.0.html.
  109. Utz S, Matzat U, Snijders C. 2009. On-line reputation systems: the effects of feedback comments and reactions on building and rebuilding trust in on-line auctions. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 13:95–118 [Google Scholar]
  110. van der Linden D, Sonnentag S, Frese M, van Dyck C. 2001. Exploration strategies, performance, and error consequences when learning a complex computer task. Behav. Inform. Technol. 20:189–98 [Google Scholar]
  111. van Dyck C. 2009. The tragic 1996 Everest expedition: a tale of error culture. Neth. J. Psychol. 65:22–34 [Google Scholar]
  112. van Dyck C, Frese M, Baer M, Sonnentag S. 2005. Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: a two-study replication. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:1228–40 [Google Scholar]
  113. van Dyck C, van Hooft EAJ, De Gilder D, Liesvelda L. 2010. Proximal antecedents and correlates of adopted error approach: a self-regulatory perspective. J. Soc. Psychol. 150:428–51 [Google Scholar]
  114. Vogus TJ, Sutcliffe KM. 2007a. The impact of safety organizing, trusted leadership, and care pathways on reported medication errors in hospital nursing units. Med. Care 45:997–1002 [Google Scholar]
  115. Vogus TJ, Sutcliffe KM. 2007b. The Safety Organizing Scale: development and validation of a behavioral measure of safety culture in hospital nursing units. Med. Care 45:46–54 [Google Scholar]
  116. Weber EU, Johnson EJ. 2009. Mindful judgment and decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60:53–85 [Google Scholar]
  117. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D. 1999. Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness. Research in Organizational Behavior RI Sutton, BM Staw 81–124 Stamford, Conn.: JAI [Google Scholar]
  118. Wilde GJS. 1988. Risk homeostasis theory and traffic accidents: propositions, deductions and discussion of dissension in recent reactions. Ergonomics 31:441–68 [Google Scholar]
  119. Wills AJ, Lavric A, Croft GS, Hodgson TL. 2007. Predictive learning, prediction errors, and attention: evidence from event-related potentials and eye tracking. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19:843–54 [Google Scholar]
  120. Wood RE, Kakebeeke BM, Debowski S, Frese M. 2000. The impact of enactive exploration on intrinsic motivation, strategy, and performance in electronic search. Appl. Psychol. 49:263–83 [Google Scholar]
  121. Zakay D, Ellis S, Shevalsky M. 2004. Outcome value and early warning indications as determinants of willingness to learn from experience. Exp. Psychol. 51:150–57 [Google Scholar]
  122. Zapf D, Brodbeck FC, Frese M, Peters H, Pruemper J. 1992. Errors in working with computers: a first validation of a taxonomy for observed errors in a field setting. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4:311–39 [Google Scholar]
  123. Zapf D, Maier GW, Rappensperger G, Irmer C. 1994. Error detection, task characteristics, and some consequences for software design. Appl. Psychol. 43:499–520 [Google Scholar]
  124. Zhao B. 2011. Learning from errors: the role of context, emotion, and personality. J. Organ. Behav. 32:435–63 [Google Scholar]
  125. Zhao B, Olivera F. 2006. Error reporting in organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 31:1012–30 [Google Scholar]
  126. Zohar D. 1980. Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. J. Appl. Psychol. 65:96–102 [Google Scholar]
  127. Zohar D. 2000. A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. J. Appl. Psychol. 85:587–96 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015205
Loading
Action Errors, Error Management, and Learning in Organizations
Annual Review of Psychology 66, 661 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015205
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015205
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015205
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error