Social Motivation at Work: The Organizational Psychology of Effort for, Against, and with Others

Literature Cited

1. Adams D. 1995. The Restaurant at the End of the Universe New York: Del Rey
2. Allan BA, Duffy RD, Collisson B. 2018. Helping others increases meaningful work: evidence from three experiments. J. Couns. Psychol. 65:155–65
   [Google Scholar]
3. Amanatullah ET, Morris MW, Curhan JR. 2008. Negotiators who give too much: unmitigated communion, relational anxieties, and economic costs in distributive and integrative bargaining. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 95:723–38
   [Google Scholar]
4. Anderson C, Sharps DL, Soto CJ, John OP 2020. People with disagreeable personalities (selfish, combative, and manipulative) do not have an advantage in pursuing power at work. PNAS 117:22780–86
   [Google Scholar]
5. Anik L, Aknin LB, Norton MI, Dunn EW, Quoidbach J. 2013. Prosocial bonuses increase employee satisfaction and team performance. PLOS ONE 8:e75509
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S. 2009. Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Am. Econ. Rev. 99:544–55
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ashraf N, Bandiera O, Jack BK. 2012. No margin, no mission? A field experiment on incentives for pro-social tasks Discuss. Pap. 8834 Cent. Econ. Policy Res. London:
8. Babcock L, Recalde MP, Vesterlund L, Weingart L. 2017. Gender differences in accepting and receiving requests for tasks with low promotability. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:714–47
   [Google Scholar]
9. Badura KL, Grijalva E, Galvin BM, Owens BP, Joseph DL. 2020. Motivation to lead: a meta-analysis and distal-proximal model of motivation and leadership. J. Appl. Psychol. 105:331–54
   [Google Scholar]
10. Baker WE, Bulkley N. 2014. Paying it forward versus rewarding reputation: mechanisms of generalized reciprocity. Organ. Sci. 25:1493–510
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I. 2010. Social incentives in the workplace. Rev. Econ. Stud. 77:417–58
    [Google Scholar]
12. Barankay I. 2012. Rank incentives: evidence from a randomized workplace experiment Work. Pap., Univ. Penn Philadelphia:
13. Baron JN. 2013. Empathy wages? Gratitude and gift exchange in employment relationships. Res. Organ. Behav. 33:113–34
    [Google Scholar]
14. Barrick MR, Stewart GL, Piotrowski M. 2002. Personality and job performance: test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. J. Appl. Psychol. 87:43–51
    [Google Scholar]
15. Barsade SG. 2002. The ripple effect: emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Adm. Sci. Q. 47:644–75
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bellé N. 2012. Experimental evidence on the relationship between public service motivation and job performance. Public Adm. Rev. 73:143–53
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bendersky C, Shah NP. 2012. The cost of status enhancement: performance effects of individuals' status mobility in task groups. Organ. Sci. 23:308–22
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bergeron DM, Shipp AJ, Rosen B, First SA. 2013. Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: the cost of being a good citizen. J. Manag. 39:958–84
    [Google Scholar]
19. Bloom N, Liang J, Roberts J, Ying ZJ. 2015. Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Q. J. Econ. 130:165–218
    [Google Scholar]
20. Bothner MS, Kim Y-K, Smith EB. 2012. How does status affect performance? Status as an asset versus status as a liability in the PGA and NASCAR. Organ. Sci 23:416–33
    [Google Scholar]
21. Brooks AW, Huang K, Abi-Esber N, Buell RW, Huang L, Hall B. 2019. Mitigating malicious envy: why successful individuals should reveal their failures. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 148:667–87
    [Google Scholar]
22. Buyl T, Boone C, Wade JB. 2019. CEO narcissism, risk-taking, and resilience: an empirical analysis in U.S. commercial banks. J. Manag. 45:1372–400
    [Google Scholar]
23. Campos-Mercade P, Meier A, Schneider F, Wengström E 2020. Prosociality predicts health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic Work. Pap. 346 Univ. Zurich Zurich:
24. Carton AM, Murphy C, Clark JR. 2014. A (blurry) vision of the future: how leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performance. Acad. Manag. J. 57:1544–70
    [Google Scholar]
25. Černe M, Nerstad CGL, Dysvik A, Škerlavaj M. 2014. What goes around comes around: knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity. Acad. Manag. J. 57:172–92
    [Google Scholar]
26. Chambers CR, Baker WE. 2020. Robust systems of cooperation in the presence of rankings: how displaying prosocial contributions can offset the disruptive effects of performance rankings. Organ. Sci. 31:287–307
    [Google Scholar]
27. Chan KY, Drasgow F. 2001. Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership: understanding the motivation to lead. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:481–98
    [Google Scholar]
28. Chancellor J, Margolis S, Jacobs Bao K, Lyubomirsky S 2018. Everyday prosociality in the workplace: the reinforcing benefits of giving, getting, and glimpsing. Emotion 18:507–17
    [Google Scholar]
29. Chatterjee A, Hambrick DC. 2007. It's all about me: narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Adm. Sci. Q. 52:351–86
    [Google Scholar]
30. Chatterjee A, Hambrick DC. 2011. Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: how narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Adm. Sci. Q. 56:202–37
    [Google Scholar]
31. Chen G, Crossland C, Huang S. 2019. That could have been me: director deaths, CEO mortality salience, and corporate prosocial behavior. Manag. Sci. 66:3142–61
    [Google Scholar]
32. Clarke S. 2013. Safety leadership: a meta-analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 86:22–49
    [Google Scholar]
33. Connelly CE, Černe M, Dysvik A, Škerlavaj M. 2019. Understanding knowledge hiding in organizations. J. Organ. Behav. 40:779–82
    [Google Scholar]
34. Côté S, DeCelles KA, McCarthy JM, Van Kleef GA, Hideg I. 2011. The Jekyll and Hyde of emotional intelligence: Emotion-regulation knowledge facilitates prosocial and interpersonally deviant behavior. Psychol. Sci. 22:1073–80
    [Google Scholar]
35. Cragun O, Olsen K, Wright PMW. 2020. Making CEO narcissism research great: a review and meta-analysis of CEO narcissism. J. Manag. 46:908–36
    [Google Scholar]
36. De Dreu CKW, Nauta A. 2009. Self-interest and other-orientation in organizational behavior: implications for job performance, prosocial behavior, and personal initiative. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:913–26
    [Google Scholar]
37. DeCelles KA, DeRue DS, Margolis JD, Ceranic TL. 2012. Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 97:681–89
    [Google Scholar]
38. DeRue DS, Ashford SJ. 2010. Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35:627–47
    [Google Scholar]
39. Diebels KJ, Leary MR, Chon D. 2018. Individual differences in selfishness as a major dimension of personality: a reinterpretation of the sixth personality factor. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 22:367–76
    [Google Scholar]
40. Dimmock SG, Gerken WC, Graham NP. 2018. Is fraud contagious? Coworker influence on misconduct by financial advisors. J. Finance 73:1417–50
    [Google Scholar]
41. Duffy MK, Scott KL, Shaw JD, Tepper BJ, Aquino K. 2012. A social context model of envy and social undermining. Acad. Manag. J. 55:643–66
    [Google Scholar]
42. Dunlop PD, Lee K. 2004. Workplace deviance, organizational citizenship behavior, and business unit performance: The bad apples do spoil the whole barrel. J. Organ. Behav. 25:67–80
    [Google Scholar]
43. Dutton JE, Duncan RB. 1987. The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic issue diagnosis. Strateg. Manag. J. 8:279–95
    [Google Scholar]
44. Dvir T, Eden D, Avolio BJ, Shamir B. 2002. Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: a field experiment. Acad. Manag. J. 45:735–44
    [Google Scholar]
45. Feldman DC. 1999. Toxic mentors or toxic proteges? A critical re-examination of dysfunctional mentoring. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 9:247–78
    [Google Scholar]
46. Flynn FJ. 2003. How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Acad. Manag. J. 46:539–53
    [Google Scholar]
47. Flynn FJ, Amanatullah ET. 2012. Psyched up or psyched out? The influence of coactor status on individual performance. Organ. Sci. 23:402–15
    [Google Scholar]
48. Flynn FJ, Reagans RE, Amanatullah ET, Ames DR. 2006. Helping one's way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91:1123–37
    [Google Scholar]
49. Gajendran RS, Harrison DA. 2007. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:1524–41
    [Google Scholar]
50. Garcia SM, Tor A. 2007. Rankings, standards and competition: task versus scale comparison. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 102:95–108
    [Google Scholar]
51. Garcia SM, Tor A. 2009. The N-effect: more competitors, less competition. Psychol. Sci. 20:871–77
    [Google Scholar]
52. Grant AM. 2008a. Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:48–58
    [Google Scholar]
53. Grant AM. 2008b. Employees without a cause: the motivational effects of prosocial impact in public service. Int. Public Manag. J. 11:48–66
    [Google Scholar]
54. Grant AM. 2008c. The significance of task significance: job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:108–24
    [Google Scholar]
55. Grant AM. 2012. Leading with meaning: beneficiary contact, prosocial impact, and the performance effects of transformational leadership. Acad. Manag. J. 55:458–76
    [Google Scholar]
56. Grant AM. 2013. Give and Take: Why Helping Others Drive Our Success New York: Viking
57. Grant AM, Berry JW. 2011. The necessity of others is the mother of invention: intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Acad. Manag. J. 54:73–96
    [Google Scholar]
58. Grant AM, Campbell EM, Chen G, Cottone K, Lapedis D, Lee K. 2007. Impact and the art of motivation maintenance: the effects of contact with beneficiaries on persistence behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 103:53–67
    [Google Scholar]
59. Grant AM, Gino F 2010. A little thanks goes a long way: explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 98:946–55
    [Google Scholar]
60. Grant AM, Hofmann DA. 2011a. It's not all about me: motivating hand hygiene among health care professionals by focusing on patients. Psychol. Sci. 22:1494–99
    [Google Scholar]
61. Grant AM, Hofmann DA. 2011b. Outsourcing inspiration: the performance effects of ideological messages from leaders and beneficiaries. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 116:173–87
    [Google Scholar]
62. Grant AM, Mayer DM. 2009. Good soldiers and good actors: prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:900–12
    [Google Scholar]
63. Grant AM, Parker SK, Collins CG. 2009. Getting credit for proactive behavior: Supervisor reactions depend on what you value and how you feel. Pers. Psychol. 62:31–55
    [Google Scholar]
64. Grant AM, Rothbard NP. 2013. When in doubt, seize the day? Security values, prosocial values, and proactivity under ambiguity. J. Appl. Psychol. 98:810–19
    [Google Scholar]
65. Grant AM, Sumanth JJ. 2009. Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:927–44
    [Google Scholar]
66. Grant AM, Wrzesniewski A. 2010. I won't let you down… or will I? Core self-evaluations, other-orientation, anticipated guilt and gratitude, and job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:108–21
    [Google Scholar]
67. Grijalva E, Harms PD, Newman DA, Gaddis BH, Fraley RC. 2015. Narcissism and leadership: a meta-analytic review of linear and nonlinear relationships. Pers. Psychol. 68:1–47
    [Google Scholar]
68. Grijalva E, Maynes TD, Badura KL, Whiting SW. 2020. Examining the “I” in team: a longitudinal investigation of the influence of team narcissism composition on team outcomes in the NBA. Acad. Manag. J. 63:7–33
    [Google Scholar]
69. Housman M, Minor D. 2016. Organizational design and space: the good, the bad, and the productive Work. Pap. 16-147 Harvard Bus. Sch., Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA:
70. Hu J, Liden RC. 2015. Making a difference in the teamwork: linking team prosocial motivation to team processes and effectiveness. Acad. Manag. J. 58:1102–27
    [Google Scholar]
71. Hu J, Zhang Z, Jiang K, Chen W 2019. Getting ahead, getting along, and getting prosocial: examining extraversion facets, peer reactions, and leadership emergence. J. Appl. Psychol. 104:1369–86
    [Google Scholar]
72. Jehn KA, Shah PP. 1997. Interpersonal relationships and task performance: an examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72:775–90
    [Google Scholar]
73. Johnson MD, Hollenbeck JR, Humphrey SE, Ilgen DR, Jundt D, Meyer CJ. 2006. Cutthroat cooperation: asymmetrical adaptation to changes in team reward structures. Acad. Manag. J. 49:103–19
    [Google Scholar]
74. Jordan JJ, Yoeli E, Rand DG 2020. Don't get it or don't spread it? Comparing self-interested versus prosocial motivations for COVID19 prevention behaviors Work. Pap., Harvard Bus. Sch., Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA:
75. Judge TA, Piccolo RF. 2004. Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. J. Appl. Psychol. 89:755–68
    [Google Scholar]
76. Jungert T, Van den Broeck A, Schreurs B, Osterman U. 2018. How colleagues can support each other's needs and motivation: an intervention on employee work motivation. Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. 67:3–29
    [Google Scholar]
77. Karau SJ, Williams KD. 1993. Social loafing: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65:681–706
    [Google Scholar]
78. Kesebir S, Lee SY, Elliot AJ, Pillutla MM. 2019. Lay beliefs about competition: scale development and gender differences. Motiv. Emot. 43:719–39
    [Google Scholar]
79. Kilduff GJ. 2014. Driven to win: rivalry, motivation, and performance. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 5:944–52
    [Google Scholar]
80. Kilduff GJ, Elfenbein HA, Staw BM. 2010. The psychology of rivalry: a relationally-dependent analysis of competition. Acad. Manag. J. 53:943–69
    [Google Scholar]
81. Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD, Gallo E, Reade JJ. 2016. Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. Acad. Manag. J. 59:1508–34
    [Google Scholar]
82. Kim E, Glomb TM. 2010. Get smarty pants: cognitive ability, personality, and victimization. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:889–901
    [Google Scholar]
83. Klotz AC, Bolino MC. 2013. Citizenship and counterproductive work behavior: a moral licensing view. Acad. Manag. Rev. 38:292–306
    [Google Scholar]
84. Knowlton K. 2021. Trailblazer mindsets and marginalized group members: when being underrepresented helps you help others PhD Thesis, Univ. Penn. Philadelphia:
85. Korsgaard MA, Meglino BM, Lester SW. 1997. Beyond helping: Do other-oriented values have broader implications in organizations?. J. Appl. Psychol. 82:160–77
    [Google Scholar]
86. Kray LJ, Reb J, Galinsky AD, Thompson L. 2004. Stereotype reactance at the bargaining table: the effect of stereotype activation and power on claiming and creating value. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 30:399–411
    [Google Scholar]
87. Kundro TG, Nurmohamed S. 2020. Understanding when and why cover-ups are punished less severely. Acad. Manag. J. 64:873–900
    [Google Scholar]
88. Lebel RD, Patil SV. 2018. Proactivity despite discouraging supervisors: the powerful role of prosocial motivation. J. Appl. Psychol. 103:724–37
    [Google Scholar]
89. Lee A, Lyubovnikova J, Tian AW, Knight C. 2020. Servant leadership: a meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, moderation, and mediation. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 93:1–44
    [Google Scholar]
90. Lee K, Duffy MK. 2019. A functional model of workplace envy and job performance: When do employees capitalize on envy by learning from envied targets?. Acad. Manag. J. 62:1085–110
    [Google Scholar]
91. Levitt S, List J. 2011. Was there really a Hawthorne effect at the Hawthorne plant? An analysis of the original illumination experiments. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 3:224–38
    [Google Scholar]
92. Lin KJ, Savani K, Ilies R. 2019. Doing good, feeling good? The roles of helping motivation and citizenship pressure. J. Appl. Psychol. 104:1020–35
    [Google Scholar]
93. Liu D, Jiang K, Shalley CE, Keem S, Zhou J. 2016. Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: a meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 137:236–63
    [Google Scholar]
94. Lockwood P, Kunda Z. 1999. Increasing the salience of one's best selves can undermine inspiration by outstanding role models. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76:214–28
    [Google Scholar]
95. Lount RB Jr., Pettit NC, Doyle SP. 2017. Motivating underdogs and favorites. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 141:82–83
    [Google Scholar]
96. Maner JK, Case CR 2016. Dominance and prestige: dual strategies for navigating social hierarchies. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 54 JM Olson, MP Zanna 129–80 San Diego, CA: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
97. Marr JC, Thau S. 2014. Falling from great (and not-so- great) heights: how initial status position influences performance after status loss. Acad. Manag. J. 57:223–48
    [Google Scholar]
98. Martin SL, Liao H, Campbell EM. 2013. Directive versus empowering leadership: a field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Acad. Manag. J. 56:1372–95
    [Google Scholar]
99. McNatt DB. 2000. Ancient Pygmalion joins contemporary management: a meta-analysis of the result. J. Appl. Psychol. 85:314–22
    [Google Scholar]
100. Melwani S, Barsade SG. 2011. Held in contempt: the psychological, interpersonal, and performance consequences of contempt in a work context. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101:503–20
     [Google Scholar]
101. Menges JI, Tussing DV, Wihler A, Grant AM. 2017. When job performance is all relative: how family motivation energizes effort and compensates for intrinsic motivation. Acad. Manag. J. 60:695–719
     [Google Scholar]
102. Miron-Spektor E, Efrat-Treister D, Rafaeli A, Schwarz-Cohen O. 2011. Others’ anger makes people work harder not smarter: the effect of observing anger and sarcasm on creative and analytic thinking. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:1065–75
     [Google Scholar]
103. Moon H. 2001. The two faces of conscientiousness: duty and achievement striving. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:533–40
     [Google Scholar]
104. Mueller JS. 2012. Why individuals in larger teams perform worse. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 117:111–24
     [Google Scholar]
105. Nguyen H-HD, Ryan AM. 2008. Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:1314–34
     [Google Scholar]
106. Nurmohamed S. 2020. The underdog effect: when low expectations increase performance. Acad. Manag. J. 63:1106–33
     [Google Scholar]
107. Obstfeld D. 2005. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 50:100–30
     [Google Scholar]
108. O'Reilly CA, Chatman JA, Doerr B. 2020. When “me” trumps “we”: narcissistic leaders and the cultures they create. Acad. Manag. Discov. 7:419–50
     [Google Scholar]
109. O'Reilly CA, Doerr B, Chatman JA. 2018.. “ See you in court”: how CEO narcissism increases firms’ vulnerability to lawsuits. Leadersh. Q. 29:365–78
     [Google Scholar]
110. Owens BP, Wallace AS, Waldman DA. 2015. Leader narcissism and follower outcomes: the counterbalancing effect of leader humility. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:1203–13
     [Google Scholar]
111. Patil SV, Lebel RD. 2019.. “ I want to serve but the public does not understand”: prosocial motivation, image discrepancies, and proactivity in public safety. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 154:34–48
     [Google Scholar]
112. Peterson BE, Stewart AJ. 1996. Antecedents and contexts of generativity motivation at midlife. Psychol. Aging 11:21–33
     [Google Scholar]
113. Peterson SJ, Galvin BM, Lange D. 2012. CEO servant leadership: exploring executive characteristics and firm performance. Pers. Psychol. 65:565–96
     [Google Scholar]
114. Piccolo RF, Colquitt JA. 2006. Transformational leadership and job behaviors: the mediating role of core job characteristics. Acad. Manag. J. 49:327–40
     [Google Scholar]
115. Pike B, Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD. 2018. The long shadow of rivalry: Rivalry motivates performance not just today but tomorrow. Psychol. Sci. 29:804–13
     [Google Scholar]
116. Podsakoff NP, Whiting SW, Podsakoff PM, Blume BD. 2009. Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:122–41
     [Google Scholar]
117. Porath CL, Erez A. 2007. Does rudeness really matter? The effects of rudeness on task performance and helpfulness. Acad. Manag. J. 50:1181–97
     [Google Scholar]
118. Rapp AA, Bachrach DG, Rapp TL. 2013. The influence of time management skill on the curvilinear relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and task performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 98:668–77
     [Google Scholar]
119. Riedl C, Woolley AW. 2016. Teams versus crowds: a field test of the relative contribution of incentives, member ability, and emergent collaboration to crowd-based problem solving performance. Acad. Manag. Discov. 3:382–403
     [Google Scholar]
120. Riskin A, Erez A, Foulk TA, Kugelman A, Gover A et al. 2015. The impact of rudeness on medical team performance: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 136:487–95
     [Google Scholar]
121. Sandvik J, Saouma R, Seegert N, Stanton C. 2020. Workplace knowledge flows. Q. J. Econ. 135:1635–80
     [Google Scholar]
122. Schaumberg RL, Wiltermuth SS. 2014. Desire for a positive moral self-regard exacerbates escalation of commitment to initiatives with prosocial aims. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 123:110–23
     [Google Scholar]
123. Shah NP, Cross R, Levin DZ. 2018. Performance benefits from providing assistance in networks: relationships that generate learning. J. Manag. 44:412–44
     [Google Scholar]
124. Sherman EL. 2019. Discretionary remote working helps mothers without harming non-mothers: evidence from a field experiment. Manag. Sci. 66:1351–74
     [Google Scholar]
125. Sleesman DJ, Conlon DE, McNamara G, Miles JE. 2012. Cleaning up the big muddy: a meta-analytic review of the determinants of escalation of commitment. Acad. Manag. J. 55:541–62
     [Google Scholar]
126. Sonenshein S, Nault K, Obodaru O. 2017. Competition of a different flavor: how a strategic group identity shapes competition and cooperation. Adm. Sci. Q. 62:626–56
     [Google Scholar]
127. Sonnentag S, Grant AM. 2012. Doing good at work feels good at home, but not right away: when and why perceived prosocial impact predicts positive affect. Pers. Psychol. 65:495–530
     [Google Scholar]
128. Staw BM, DeCelles KA, de Goey P. 2019. Leadership in the locker room: how the intensity of leaders’ unpleasant affective displays shapes team performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 104:1547–57
     [Google Scholar]
129. Sy T, Côté S, Saavedra R. 2005. The contagious leader: impact of the leader's mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:295–305
     [Google Scholar]
130. ten Brinke L, Kish A, Keltner D. 2017. Hedge fund managers with psychopathic tendencies make for worse investors. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 44:214–23
     [Google Scholar]
131. ten Brinke L, Liu CC, Keltner D, Srivastava S. 2016. Virtues, vices, and political influence in the U.S. Senate. Psychol. Sci. 27:85–93
     [Google Scholar]
132. To C, Kilduff GJ, Ordonez L, Schweitzer ME. 2018. Going for it on fourth down: Rivalry increases risk taking, physiological arousal, and promotion focus. Acad. Manag. J. 61:1281–306
     [Google Scholar]
133. Tong EMW, Ng C-X, Ho JBH, Yap IJL, Chua EXY et al. 2020. Gratitude facilitates obedience: new evidence for the social alignment perspective. Emotion In press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/emo0000928
     [Google Scholar]
134. Tucker AL, Singer SJ. 2015. The effectiveness of management-by-walking-around: a randomized field study. Prod. Oper. Manag. 24:253–71
     [Google Scholar]
135. Turner Y, Silberman S, Joffe S, Hadas-Halpern I. 2008. The effects of including a patient's photograph to the radiographic examination Paper presented at the 94th Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Chicago: Nov. 30–Dec. 5
136. Tussing DV. 2018. Hesitant at the helm: the effectiveness-emergence paradox of reluctance to lead PhD Thesis, Univ. Penn. Philadelphia:
137. Umphress EE, Bingham JB, Mitchell MS. 2010. Unethical behavior in the name of the company: the moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:769–80
     [Google Scholar]
138. Utz S, Muscanell N, Göritz AS. 2014. Give, match, or take: a new personality construct predicts resource and information sharing. Pers. Individ. Differ. 70:11–16
     [Google Scholar]
139. Van de Ven N. 2017. Envy and admiration: emotion and motivation following upward social comparison. Cogn. Emot. 31:193–200
     [Google Scholar]
140. Van Kleef GA, Homan AC, Beersma B, van Knippenberg D. 2010. On angry leaders and agreeable followers: how leaders’ emotions and followers’ personalities shape motivation and team performance. Psychol. Sci. 21:1827–34
     [Google Scholar]
141. van Knippenberg B, van Knippenberg D. 2005. Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: the moderating role of leader prototypicality. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:25–37
     [Google Scholar]
142. Vianello M, Galliani EM, Haidt J. 2010. Elevation at work: the effects of leaders’ moral excellence. J. Posit. Psychol. 5:390–411
     [Google Scholar]
143. Wade-Benzoni KA, Tost LP, Hernandez M, Larrick RP. 2012. It's only a matter of time: death, legacies, and intergenerational decisions. Psychol. Sci. 23:704–9
     [Google Scholar]
144. Wakeman SW, Peterson RS. 2017. A sheep in wolf's clothing: how communal narcissists reduce status conflict in teams. Acad. Manag. Proc 2017: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.13626abstract
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
145. Wang G, Oh I-S, Courtright SH, Colbert AE. 2011. Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group. Organ. Manag. 36:223–70
     [Google Scholar]
146. Wiltermuth SS. 2011. Cheating more when the spoils are split. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 115:157–68
     [Google Scholar]
147. Wright PM, George JM, Farnsworth SR, McMahan GC. 1993. Productivity and extra-role behavior: the effects of goals and incentives on spontaneous helping. J. Appl. Psychol. 78:374–81
     [Google Scholar]
148. Wrzesniewski A, Dutton JE. 2001. Crafting a job: revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26:179–201
     [Google Scholar]
149. Wu J, Liden RC, Liao C, Wayne SJ. 2021. Does manager servant leadership lead to follower serving behaviors? It depends on follower self-interest. J. Appl. Psychol. 106:152–67
     [Google Scholar]
150. Zhang X, Liao H, Li N, Colbert AE 2020. Playing it safe for my family: exploring the dual effects of family motivation on employee productivity and creativity. Acad. Manag. J. 63:1923–50
     [Google Scholar]
151. Zhu Y, Chen T, Wang J, Wang M, Johnson RE, Jin Y 2021. How critical activities within COVID-19 intensive care units increase nurses’ daily occupational calling. J. Appl. Psychol. 106:4–14
     [Google Scholar]