1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Public Health
  4. Volume 41, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Public Health

Volume 41, 2020

Partnerships, Processes, and Outcomes: A Health Equity–Focused Scoping Meta-Review of Community-Engaged Scholarship

Abstract

In recent decades, there has been remarkable growth in scholarship examining the usefulness of community-engaged research (CEnR) and community-based participatory research (CBPR) for eliminating health inequities.This article seeks to synthesize the extant literature of systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and other related reviews regarding the context, processes, and research designs and interventions underlying CEnR that optimize its effectiveness. Through a scoping review, we have utilized an empirically derived framework of CBPR to map this literature and identify key findings and priorities for future research. Our study found 100 reviews of CEnR that largely support the CBPR conceptual framework.

Keyword(s): CAPs, CBPR, CBPR conceptual model, CEnR, community-based participatory research, community-engaged research, community–academic partnerships, PAR, participatory action research, participatory health research, research-to-practice partnerships, RPPs
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094220
2020-04-01
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/publhealth/41/1/annurev-publhealth-040119-094220.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094220&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1. 
    Adebayo OW, Salerno JP, Francillon V, Williams JR 2018. A systematic review of components of community-based organisation engagement. Health Soc. Care Community 26:e474–84
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 2. 
    Amendola MG. 2011. Empowerment: healthcare professionals' and community members' contributions. J. Cult. Divers. 18:82–89
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 3. 
    Anderson LM, Adeney KL, Shinn C, Safranek S, Buckner‐Brown J, Krause LK 2015. Community coalition‐driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015. 6:CD00905
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 4. 
    Andrews JO, Newman SD, Heath J, Williams LB, Tingen MS 2012. Community-based participatory research and smoking cessation interventions: a review of the evidence. Nurs. Clin. North. Am. 47:81–96
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 5. 
    Anyon Y, Bender K, Kennedy H, Dechants J 2018. A systematic review of youth participatory action research (YPAR) in the United States: methodologies, youth outcomes, and future directions. Health Educ. Behav. 45:6865–78
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 6. 
    Arnstein SR. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Plan. 35:216–24
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. 
    Attree P, French B, Milton B, Povall S, Whitehead M, Popay J 2011. The experience of community engagement for individuals: a rapid review of evidence. Health Soc. Care Community 19:250–60
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 8. 
    Averill JB. 2016. An ethnographic meta-synthesis of three southwestern rural studies. Public Health Nurs 33:32–41
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. 
    Banna J, Bersamin A. 2018. Community involvement in design, implementation and evaluation of nutrition interventions to reduce chronic diseases in indigenous populations in the U.S.: a systematic review. Int. J. Equity Health 17:116
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 10. 
    Beaulieu M, Breton M, Brousselle A 2018. Conceptualizing 20 years of engaged scholarship: a scoping review. PLOS ONE 13:e0193201
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 11. 
    Belone L, Lucero JE, Duran B, Tafoya G, Baker EA et al. 2016. Community-based participatory research conceptual model: community partner consultation and face validity. Qual. Health Res. 26:117–35
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 12. 
    Bowen DJ, Hyams T, Goodman M, West KM, Harris-Wai J, Yu JH 2017. Systematic review of quantitative measures of stakeholder engagement. Clin. Transl. Sci. 10:314–36
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 13. 
    Bradbury-Jones C, Isham L, Taylor J 2018. The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people: a qualitative systematic review. Soc. Sci. Med. 215:80–91
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 14. 
    Bradford LEA, Okpalauwaekwe U, Waldner CL, Bharadwaj LA 2016. Drinking water quality in Indigenous communities in Canada and health outcomes: a scoping review. Int. J. Circumpolar Health 75:32336
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 15. 
    Brandstetter S, Rüter J, Curbach J, Loss J 2015. A systematic review on empowerment for healthy nutrition in health promotion. Public Health Nutr 18:3146–54
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 16. 
    Braveman P. 2017. A new definition of health equity to guide future efforts and measure progress. Health Aff. Blog June 22
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 17. 
    Braveman P, Gruskin S. 2003. Defining equity in health. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57:4254–58
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 18. 
    Brear M, Hammarberg K, Fisher J 2018. Community participation in research from resource-constrained countries: a scoping review. Health Promot. Int. 33:723–33
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 19. 
    Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J et al. 2014. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect 17:637–50
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 20. 
    Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J et al. 2014. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient 7:387–95
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 21. 
    Brizay U, Golob L, Globerman J, Gogolishvili D, Bird M et al. 2015. Community-academic partnerships in HIV-related research: a systematic literature review of theory and practice. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 18:19354
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 22. 
    Brooks JS, Waylen KA, Borgerhoff Mulder M 2012. How national context, project design, and local community characteristics influence success in community-based conservation projects. PNAS 109:21265–70
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 23. 
    Brunton G, O'Mara-Eves A, Thomas J 2014. The ‘active ingredients’ for successful community engagement with disadvantaged expectant and new mothers: a qualitative comparative analysis. J. Adv. Nurs. 70:2847–60
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 24. 
    Brunton G, Thomas J, O'Mara-Eves A, Jamal F, Oliver S, Kavanagh J 2017. Narratives of community engagement: a systematic review-derived conceptual framework for public health interventions. BMC Public Health 17:944
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 25. 
    Bush PL, Pluye P, Loignon C, Granikov V, Wright MT et al. 2017. Organizational participatory research: a systematic mixed studies review exposing its extra benefits and the key factors associated with them. Implement. Sci. 12:119
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 26. 
    Bush PL, Pluye P, Loignon C, Granikov V, Wright MT et al. 2018. A systematic mixed studies review on Organizational Participatory Research: towards operational guidance. BMC Health Serv. Res. 18:992
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 27. 
    Busse JW, Bruno P, Malik K, Connell G, Torrance D et al. 2014. An efficient strategy allowed English-speaking reviewers to identify foreign-language articles eligible for a systematic review. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 67:547–53
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 28. 
    Camden C, Shikako-Thomas K, Nguyen T, Graham E, Thomas A et al. 2015. Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts. Disabil. Rehabil. 37:1390–400
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 29. 
    Cargo M, Mercer SL. 2008. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu. Rev. Public Health 29:325–50
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 30. 
    Carter MW, Tregear ML, Lachance CR 2015. Community engagement in family planning in the U.S.: a systematic review. Am. J. Prev. Med. 49:S116–23
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 31. 
    Castaneda SF, Holscher J, Mumman MK, Salgado H, Keir KB et al. 2012. Dimensions of community and organizational readiness for change. Progress Community Health Partnerships 6:219–26
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 32. 
    Catalani C, Minkler M. 2010. Photovoice: a review of the literature in health and public health. Health Educ. Behav. 37:424–51
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 33. 
    Chambers LA, Jackson R, Worthington C, Wilson CL, Tharao W et al. 2018. Decolonizing scoping review methodologies for literature with, for, and by Indigenous Peoples and the African Diaspora: dialoguing with the tensions. Qual. Health Res. 28:175–88
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 34. 
    Chandanabhumma PP, Duran BM, Peterson JC, Pearson CR, Oetzel JG et al. 2019. Space within the scientific discourse for the voice of the other? Expressions of community voice in the scientific discourse of community-based participatory research. Health Commun 28: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1581409
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  35. 35. 
    Chen PG, Diaz N, Lucas G, Rosenthal MS 2010. Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research. Am. J. Prev. Med. 39:372–78
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 36. 
    Chuah FLH, Srivastava A, Rajkumar Singh S, Haldane V, Koh HCH et al. 2018. Community participation in general health initiatives in high and upper-middle income countries: a systematic review exploring the nature of participation, use of theories, contextual drivers and power relations in community participation. Soc. Sci. Med. 213:106–22
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 37. 
    Coburn CE, Penuel WR, Geil KE 2013. Research-practice partnerships: a strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts White Pap., William T. Grant Found New York: https://wtgrantfoundation.org/library/uploads/2015/10/Research-Practice-Partnerships-at-the-District-Level.pdf
  38. 38. 
    Cohen BE, Marshall SG. 2017. Does public health advocacy seek to redress health inequities? A scoping review. Health Soc. Care Community 25:309–28
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 39. 
    Conklin A, Morris Z, Nolte E 2015. What is the evidence base for public involvement in health-care policy? Results of a systematic scoping review. Health Expect 18:153–65
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 40. 
    Cook WK. 2008. Integrating research and action: a systematic review of community-based participatory research to address health disparities in environmental and occupational health in the USA. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62:668–76
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 41. 
    Corburn J. 2005. Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  42. 42. 
    Cordeiro L, Rittenmeyer L, Soares CB 2015. Action research methodology in the health care field: a scoping review protocol. JBI Database Syst. Rev. Implement. Rep. 13:70–78
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 43. 
    Coughlin SS. 2016. Community-based participatory research studies on HIV/AIDS prevention, 2005–2014. Jacobs J. Community Med. 2:019
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 44. 
    Coughlin SS, Smith SA. 2016. A review of community-based participatory research studies to promote physical activity among African Americans. J. Ga. Public Health Assoc. 5:220–27
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 45. 
    Coughlin SS, Smith SA. 2017. Community-based participatory research to promote healthy diet and nutrition and prevent and control obesity among African-Americans: a literature review. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 4:259–68
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 46. 
    CTSA (Clin. Transl. Sci. Awards) Key Funct. Comm. Task Force Princip. Community Engagem 2011. Principles of community engagement 2nd ed. NIH Publ. 11-7782, Natl. Inst. Health, US Dep. Health Hum. Serv., Bethesda, MD/ Washington, DC: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pdf/PCE_Report_508_FINAL.pdf
  47. 47. 
    Cyril S, Smith BJ, Possamai-Inesedy A, Renzaho AMN 2015. Exploring the role of community engagement in improving the health of disadvantaged populations: a systematic review. Glob. Health Action 8:29842
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 48. 
    Dassah E, Aldersey HM, Norman KE 2017. Photovoice and persons with physical disabilities: a scoping review of the literature. Qual. Health Res. 27:1412–22
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 49. 
    Dawson S, Campbell SM, Giles SJ, Morris RL, Cheraghi-Sohi S 2018. Black and minority ethnic group involvement in health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect 21:3–22
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 50. 
    De Las Nueces D, Hacker K, DiGirolamo A, Hicks LS 2012. A systematic review of community‐based participatory research to enhance clinical trials in racial and ethnic minority groups. Health Serv. Res. 47:1363–86
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 51. 
    De Weger E, Van Vooren N, Luijkx KG, Baan CA, Drewes HW 2018. Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 18:285
     [Google Scholar]
  52. 52. 
    de Wit L, Fenenga C, Giammarchi C, di Furia L, Hutter I et al. 2017. Community-based initiatives improving critical health literacy: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence. BMC Public Health 18:40
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 53. 
    DeJonckheere M, Lindquist-Grantz R, Toraman S, Haddad K, Vaughn LM 2018. Intersection of mixed methods and community-based participatory research: a methodological review. J. Mixed Methods Res. 13:481–502
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 54. 
    Drahota A, Meza RD, Brikho B, Naaf M, Estabillo JA et al. 2016. Community‐academic partnerships: a systematic review of the state of the literature and recommendations for future research. Milbank Q 94:163–214
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 55. 
    Drame ER, Irby DJ 2016. Black Participatory Research: Power, Identity, and the Struggle for Justice in Education New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  56. 56. 
    Drawson AS, Toombs E, Mushquash CJ 2017. Indigenous research methods: a systematic review. Int. Indig. Policy J. 8:2 https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2017.8.2.5
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  57. 57. 
    Duran B, Oetzel J, Magarati M, Parker M, Zhou Cet al. 2019. Towards health equity: a national study of promising practices in community-based participatory research. Progr. Community Health Partnersh 13:337–52
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 58. 
    Eder MM, Carter-Edwards L, Hurd TC, Rumala BB, Wallerstein N 2013. A logic model for community engagement within the CTSA Consortium: Can we measure what we model?. Acad. Med. 88:1430–36
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 59. 
    Evans D, Pilkington P, McEachran M 2010. Rhetoric or reality? A systematic review of the impact of participatory approaches by UK public health units on health and social outcomes. J. Public Health 32:418–26
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 60. 
    Fergusson D, Monfaredi Z, Pussegoda K, Garritty C, Lyddiatt A et al. 2018. The prevalence of patient engagement in published trials: a systematic review. Res. Involv. Engagem. 4:17
     [Google Scholar]
  61. 61. 
    Fleischhacker S, Roberts E, Camplain R, Evenson KR, Gittelsohn J 2016. Promoting physical activity among Native American youth: a systematic review of the methodology and current evidence of physical activity interventions and community-wide initiatives. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 3:608–24
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 62. 
    Freire P. 2018. Pedagogy of the Oppressed transl. MB Ramos New York: Bloomsbury
  63. 63. 
    Frerichs L, Ataga O, Corbie-Smith G, Tessler Lindau S 2016. Child and youth participatory interventions for addressing lifestyle-related childhood obesity: a systematic review. Obes. Rev. 17:1276–86
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 64. 
    Frerichs L, Lich KH, Dave G, Corbie-Smith G 2016. Integrating systems science and community-based participatory research to achieve health equity. Am. J. Public Health 106:215–22
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 65. 
    George S, Duran N, Norris K 2014. A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. Am. J. Public Health 104:e16–31
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 66. 
    Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, Janamian T 2016. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Q 94:392–429
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 67. 
    Gribble MO, Around Him DM 2014. Ethics and community involvement in syntheses concerning American Indian, Alaska Native, or Native Hawaiian health: a systematic review. AJOB Empir. Bioeth. 5:1–24
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 68. 
    Haijes HA, van Thiel GJ 2016. Participatory methods in pediatric participatory research: a systematic review. Pediatr. Res. 79:676–83
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 69. 
    Haithcox-Dennis M, DeWeese A, Goodman J 2013. Rethinking the factors of success: social support and community coalitions. Am. J. Health Educ. 44:110–18
     [Google Scholar]
  70. 70. 
    Happell B, Ewart SB, Platania-Phung C, Stanton R 2016. Participative mental health consumer research for improving physical health care: an integrative review. Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs. 25:399–408
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 71. 
    Henrick EC, Cobb P, Penuel WR, Jackson K, Clark T 2017. Assessing research-practice partnerships: five dimensions of effectiveness Rep., William T. Grant Found New York: https://wtgrantfoundation.org/library/uploads/2017/10/Assessing-Research-Practice-Partnerships.pdf
  72. 72. 
    Hergenrather KC, Rhodes SD, Cowan CA, Bardhoshi G, Pula S 2009. Photovoice as community-based participatory research: a qualitative review. Am. J. Health Behav. 33:686–98
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 73. 
    Hicks S, Duran B, Wallerstein N, Avila M, Belone L et al. 2012. Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health. Progress Community Health Partnersh 6:289–99
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 74. 
    Hou SI, Cao X. 2018. A systematic review of promising strategies of faith-based cancer education and lifestyle interventions among racial/ethnic minority groups. J. Cancer Educ. 33:1161–75
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 75. 
    Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB 1998. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 19:173–202
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 76. 
    Jagosh J, Bush PL, Salsberg J, Macaulay AC, Greenhalgh T et al. 2015. A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health 15:725
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 77. 
    Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P, Salsberg J, Bush PL et al. 2012. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. Milbank Q 90:311–46
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 78. 
    Jagosh J, Pluye P, Macaulay AC, Salsberg J, Henderson J et al. 2011. Assessing the outcomes of participatory research: protocol for identifying, selecting, appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review. Implement. Sci. 6:24
     [Google Scholar]
  79. 79. 
    Johnson BT, Hennessy EA. 2019. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: best practice methods for research syntheses. Soc. Sci. Med. 233:237–51
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 80. 
    Kenny A, Hyett N, Sawtell J, Dickson-Swift V, Farmer J, O'Meara P 2013. Community participation in rural health: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 13:64
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 81. 
    Krishnaswami J, Martinson M, Wakimoto P, Anglemeyer A 2012. Community-engaged interventions on diet, activity, and weight outcomes in U.S. schools: a systematic review. Am. J. Prev. Med. 43:81–91
     [Google Scholar]
  82. 82. 
    Kwan C, Walsh CA. 2018. Ethical issues in conducting community-based participatory research: a narrative review of the literature. Qual. Rep. 23:369–86
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 83. 
    Laverack G. 2006. Improving health outcomes through community empowerment: a review of the literature. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 24:113–20
     [Google Scholar]
  84. 84. 
    Loutfi D, Law S, McCutcheon C, Carlin R, Torrie J, MacDonald ME 2018. Health planning for Indigenous populations: a rapid evidence review. Int. Indig. Policy J. 9:7
     [Google Scholar]
  85. 85. 
    Majamanda J, Maureen D, Munkhondia TM, Carrier J 2014. The effectiveness of community-based nutrition education on the nutrition status of under-five children in developing countries. A systematic review. Malawi Med. J. 26:115–18
     [Google Scholar]
  86. 86. 
    Mann L, Foley KL, Tanner AE, Sun CJ, Rhodes SD 2015. Increasing cervical cancer screening among US Hispanics/Latinas: a qualitative systematic review. J. Cancer Educ. 30:374–87
     [Google Scholar]
  87. 87. 
    McCalman J, Tsey K, Wenitong M, Wilson A, McEwan A et al. 2010. Indigenous men's support groups and social and emotional wellbeing: a meta-synthesis of the evidence. Aust. J. Prim. Health 16:159–66
     [Google Scholar]
  88. 88. 
    McWhirter R, Critchley C, Nicol D, Chalmers D, Whitton T et al. 2014. Community engagement for big epidemiology: deliberative democracy as a tool. J. Pers. Med. 4:459–74
     [Google Scholar]
  89. 89. 
    Mikesell L, Bromley E, Khodyakov D 2013. Ethical community-engaged research: a literature review. Am. J. Public Health 103:e7–14
     [Google Scholar]
  90. 90. 
    Miller J, Knott VE, Wilson C, Roder D 2012. A review of community engagement in cancer control studies among Indigenous people of Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the USA. Eur. J. Cancer Care 21:283–95
     [Google Scholar]
  91. 91. 
    Milton B, Attree P, French B, Povall S, Whitehead M, Popay J 2011. The impact of community engagement on health and social outcomes: a systematic review. Community Dev. J. 47:3316–34
     [Google Scholar]
  92. 92. 
    Minkler M. 2000. Using participatory action research to build healthy communities. Public Health Rep 115:2–3191–97
     [Google Scholar]
  93. 93. 
    Morales-Campos DY, Parra-Medina D, Esparza LA 2015. Picture this!: using participatory photo mapping with Hispanic girls. Fam. Community Health 38:44–54
     [Google Scholar]
  94. 94. 
    Morrison A, Polisena J, Husereau D, Moulton K, Clark M et al. 2012. The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 28:138–44
     [Google Scholar]
  95. 95. 
    Muhammad M, Wallerstein N, Sussman A, Avila M, Belone L 2015. Reflections on researcher identity and power: the impact of positionality on community based participatory research (CBPR) processes and outcomes. Crit. Sociol. 41:7–81045–63
     [Google Scholar]
  96. 96. 
    Natl. Acad. Sci. Eng. Med 2017. Communities in Action: Pathways to Health Equity JN Weinstein, A Geller, Y Negussie, A Baciu Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  97. 97. 
    Nwanyanwu KH, Grossetta Nardini HK, Shaughness G, Nunez-Smith M, Newman-Casey P-A 2017. Systematic review of community-engaged research in ophthalmology. Expert Rev. Ophthalmol. 12:233–41
     [Google Scholar]
  98. 98. 
    O'Mara-Eves A, Brunton G, McDaid G, Oliver S, Kavanagh J et al. 2013. Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis. Public Health Res 1:4 https://doi.org/10.3310/phr01040
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  99. 99. 
    O'Mara-Eves A, Thomas J, McNaught J, Miwa M, Ananiadou S 2015. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Syst. Rev. 4:15
     [Google Scholar]
  100. 100. 
    Oetzel JG, Wallerstein N, Duran B, Sanchez-Youngman S, Nguyen T et al. 2018. Impact of participatory health research: a test of the community-based participatory research conceptual model. BioMed. Res. Int. 2018.7281405
     [Google Scholar]
  101. 101. 
    Oetzel JG, Zhou C, Duran B, Pearson C, Magarati M et al. 2015. Establishing the psychometric properties of constructs in a community-based participatory research conceptual model. Am. J. Health Promot. 29:e188–202
     [Google Scholar]
  102. 102. 
    Ozer E, Akemi Piatt A 2018. Youth-led participatory action research (YPAR): principles applied to U.S. and diverse global settings. See Ref. 129 95–106
     [Google Scholar]
  103. 103. 
    Pearson CR, Duran B, Oetzel J, Margarati M, Villegas M et al. 2015. Research for improved health: variability and impact of structural characteristics in federally funded community engaged research. Progr. Community Health Partnersh. 9:17–29
     [Google Scholar]
  104. 104. 
    Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR 1999. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Adm. Sci. Q. 44:11–28
     [Google Scholar]
  105. 105. 
    Preston R, Waugh H, Larkins S, Taylor J 2010. Community participation in rural primary health care: intervention or approach?. Aust. J. Primary Health 16:4–16
     [Google Scholar]
  106. 106. 
    Prost A, Colbourn T, Seward N, Azad K, Coomarasamy A et al. 2013. Women's groups practising participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 381:1736–46
     [Google Scholar]
  107. 107. 
    Ragavan MI, Thomas K, Medzhitova J, Brewer N, Goodman LA, Bair-Merritt M 2018. A systematic review of community-based research interventions for domestic violence survivors. Psychol. Violence 9:139–46
     [Google Scholar]
  108. 108. 
    Ragavan MI, Thomas KA, Fulambarker A, Zaricor J, Goodman LA, Bair-Merritt MH 2018. Exploring the needs and lived experiences of racial and ethnic minority domestic violence survivors through community-based participatory research: a systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018813204
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  109. 109. 
    Rifkin SB. 2014. Examining the links between community participation and health outcomes: a review of the literature. Health Policy Plan 29:ii98–106
     [Google Scholar]
  110. 110. 
    Salimi Y, Shahandeh K, Malekafzali H, Loori N, Kheiltash A et al. 2012. Is community-based participatory research (CBPR) useful? A systematic review on papers in a decade. Int. J. Prev. Med. 3:386–93
     [Google Scholar]
  111. 111. 
    Salsberg J, Parry D, Pluye P, Macridis S, Herbert CP, Macaulay AC 2015. Successful strategies to engage research partners for translating evidence into action in community health: a critical review. J. Environ. Public Health 2015.191856
     [Google Scholar]
  112. 112. 
    Sandoval JA, Lucero J, Oetzel J, Avila M, Belone L et al. 2012. Process and outcome constructs for evaluating community-based participatory research projects: a matrix of existing measures. Health Educ. Res. 27:680–90
     [Google Scholar]
  113. 113. 
    Shaibi GQ, Konopken Y, Hoppin E, Keller CS, Ortega R, Castro FG 2012. Effects of a culturally grounded community-based diabetes prevention program for obese Latino adolescents. Diabetes Educ 38:504–12
     [Google Scholar]
  114. 114. 
    Shamrova DP, Cummings CE. 2017. Participatory action research (PAR) with children and youth: an integrative review of methodology and PAR outcomes for participants, organizations, and communities. Children Youth Serv. Rev. 81:400–12
     [Google Scholar]
  115. 115. 
    Sikorski C, Van Hees S, Lakhanpaul M, Benton L, Martin J et al. 2018. Could postnatal women's groups be used to improve outcomes for mothers and children in high-income countries? A systematic review. Matern. Child Health J. 22:1698–712
     [Google Scholar]
  116. 116. 
    Skevington SM, Sovetkina EC, Gillison FB 2013. A systematic review to quantitatively evaluate ‘Stepping Stones’: a participatory community-based HIV/AIDS prevention intervention. AIDS Behav 17:1025–39
     [Google Scholar]
  117. 117. 
    Soh KL, Davidson PM, Leslie G, Rahman ABA 2011. Action research studies in the intensive care setting: a systematic review. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 48:2258–68
     [Google Scholar]
  118. 118. 
    Souleymanov R, Kuzmanović D, Marshall Z, Scheim AI, Mikiki M et al. 2016. The ethics of community-based research with people who use drugs: results of a scoping review. BMC Med. Ethics 17:25
     [Google Scholar]
  119. 119. 
    Spector AY. 2012. CBPR with service providers: arguing a case for engaging practitioners in all phases of research. Health Promot. Pract. 13:252–58
     [Google Scholar]
  120. 120. 
    Stacciarini J-M, Shattell MM, Coady M, Wiens B 2011. Review: community-based participatory research approach to address mental health in minority populations. Community Ment. Health J. 47:489–97
     [Google Scholar]
  121. 121. 
    Stacciarini J-MR. 2009. A review of community-based participatory research: a promising approach to address depression among Latinos?. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 30:751–57
     [Google Scholar]
  122. 122. 
    Swanberg JE, Nichols HM, Clouser JM, Check P, Edwards L et al. 2018. A systematic review of community health workers’ role in occupational safety and health research. J. Immigr. Minor. Health 20:1516–31
     [Google Scholar]
  123. 123. 
    Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H et al. 2018. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 169:467–73
     [Google Scholar]
  124. 124. 
    Vaughn LM, Jacquez F, Lindquist-Grantz R, Parsons A, Melink K 2017. Immigrants as research partners: a review of immigrants in community-based participatory research (CBPR). J. Immigr. Minor. Health 19:1457–68
     [Google Scholar]
  125. 125. 
    Vaughn LM, Jones JR, Booth E, Burke JG 2017. Concept mapping methodology and community-engaged research: a perfect pairing. Eval. Progr. Plan. 60:229–37
     [Google Scholar]
  126. 126. 
    Vaughn LM, Wagner E, Jacquez F 2013. A review of community-based participatory research in child health. MCN Am. J. Matern. Child Nurs. 38:48–53
     [Google Scholar]
  127. 127. 
    Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, Garlehner G, Lohr KN et al. 2004. Community‐based participatory research: assessing the evidence: summary AHRQ Publ. 04-E022-1, AHRQ Evid. Rep. Summ., Agency Healthc. Res. Quality Rockville, MD:
  128. 128. 
    Wallerstein N, Duran B. 2010. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am. J. Public Health 100:S40–46
     [Google Scholar]
  129. 129. 
    Wallerstein N, Duran B, Oetzel JG, Minkler M 2018. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: Advancing Social and Health Equity Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
  130. 130. 
    Wallerstein N, Giatti LL, Bógus CM, Akerman M, Jacobi PR et al. 2017. Shared participatory research principles and methodologies: perspectives from the USA and Brazil—45 years after Paulo Freire's “Pedagogy of the Oppressed.”. Societies 7:6
     [Google Scholar]
  131. 131. 
    Wallerstein N, Muhammad M, Avila M, Belone L, Lucero J et al. 2019. Power dynamics in community based participatory research: a multi-case study analysis partnering contexts, histories and practices. Health Educ. Behav. 46:1S19S–32
     [Google Scholar]
  132. 132. 
    Wallerstein N, Oetzel J, Duran B, Magarati M, Pearson C et al. 2019. Culture-centeredness in community based participatory research: its impact on health intervention research. Health Educ. Res. 34:4372–88
     [Google Scholar]
  133. 133. 
    Wallerstein N, Oetzel J, Duran B, Tafoya G, Belone L, Rae R 2008. What predicts outcomes in CBPR?. Community Based Participatory Research For Health: Process to Outcomes M Minkler, N Wallerstein 371–92 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  134. 134. 
    Wallerstein N, Oetzel J, Sanchez-Youngman S, Boursaw B, Dickson E et al. 2020. Engage for equity: a long-term study of community based participatory research and community engaged research practices and outcomes. Health Educ. Behav. In press
     [Google Scholar]
  135. 135. 
    Weiss D, Lillefjell M, Magnus E 2016. Facilitators for the development and implementation of health promoting policy and programs—a scoping review at the local community level. BMC Public Health 16:140
     [Google Scholar]
  136. 136. 
    Welch V, Petticrew M, Petkovic J, Moher D, Waters E et al. 2016. Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 70:68–89
     [Google Scholar]
  137. 137. 
    Welch V, Petticrew M, Tugwell P, Moher D, O'Neill J et al. 2012. PRISMA-Equity 2012 Extension: reporting guidelines for systematic reviews with a focus on health equity. PLOS Med 9:e1001333
     [Google Scholar]
  138. 138. 
    Wiggins N. 2012. Popular education for health promotion and community empowerment: a review of the literature. Health Promot. Int. 27:356–71
     [Google Scholar]
  139. 139. 
    Williams MV, Palar K, Pitkin Derose K 2011. Congregation-based programs to address HIV/AIDS: elements of successful implementation. J. Urban Health 88:3517–32
     [Google Scholar]
  140. 140. 
    Wilson E, Kenny A, Dickson-Swift V 2018. Ethical challenges in community-based participatory research: a scoping review. Qual. Health Res. 28:189–99
     [Google Scholar]
  141. 141. 
    Wolfenden L, Wyse R, Nichols M, Allender S, Millar L, McElduff P 2014. A systematic review and meta-analysis of whole of community interventions to prevent excessive population weight gain. Prev. Med. 62:193–200
     [Google Scholar]
  142. 142. 
    Yuen T, Park AN, Seifer SD, Payne-Sturges D 2015. A systematic review of community engagement in the US Environmental Protection Agency's extramural research solicitations: implications for research funders. Am. J. Public Health 105:e44–52
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094220
Loading
Partnerships, Processes, and Outcomes: A Health Equity–Focused Scoping Meta-Review of Community-Engaged Scholarship
Annual Review of Public Health 41, 177 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094220
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094220
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094220
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Data

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error