1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Sociology
  4. Volume 48, 2022
  5. Article

Annual Review of Sociology

Volume 48, 2022

American Religion in the Era of Increasing Polarization

Abstract

Americans are increasingly polarized by a variety of metrics. The dimensions, extent, causes, and consequences of that polarization have been the subject of much debate. Yet despite the centrality of religion to early discussions, the analytical focus on America's divides has largely shifted toward partisan identity, political ideology, race, and class interests. I show that religion remains powerfully implicated in all dimensions of American polarization, and sociologists must once again make religion more central to their analyses. After outlining research on American polarization, focusing on the role of religion, I survey findings within the burgeoning literatures on cultural transformation processes, (White) Christian nationalism, complex religion, and Americans’ attitudes toward science in order to underscore the centrality of ethno-religious identities, religious demography, and religious institutions for both shaping and exacerbating various forms of polarization. Lastly, I propose an agenda for elucidating religion's ongoing role in understanding polarization beyond public opinion research at the macro-, meso-, and micro-levels. Though polarization research has been dominated by political scientists, leveraging religion in our analyses—not merely as a sui generis variable, but as a site of complex social behavior—facilitates novel sociological contributions to these literatures via our relative attention to multiple levels of analysis, theoretical eclecticism, and methodological fluidity.

Keyword(s): Christian nationalism, complex religion, culture war, polarization, politics, race, science
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-114239
2022-07-29
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/48/1/annurev-soc-031021-114239.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-114239&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abramowitz AI. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  2. Abramowitz AI, McCoy J. 2018. United States: racial resentment, negative partisanship, and polarization in Trump's America. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 681:1137–56
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Abramowitz AI, Saunders KL. 2008. Is polarization a myth?. J. Politics 70:2542–55
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Alba R, Foner N 2017. Immigration and the geography of polarization. City Commun 16:3239–43
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Alwin DF, Tufis PA 2016. The changing dynamics of class and culture in American politics: a test of the polarization hypothesis. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 663:1229–69
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Am. Political Sci. Assoc. 1950. Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System New York: Rinehart
  7. Arbatli E, Rosenberg D. 2021. United we stand, divided we rule: how political polarization erodes democracy. Democratization 28:2285–307
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bail C. 2021. Breaking the Social Media Prism: How to Make Our Platforms Less Polarizing Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  9. Baker JO, Martí G. 2020. Is the religious Left resurgent?. Sociol. Religion 81:2131–41
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Baker JO, Perry SL, Whitehead AL. 2020a. Crusading for moral authority: Christian nationalism and opposition to science. Sociol. Forum 35:3587–607
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Baker JO, Perry SL, Whitehead AL. 2020b. Keep America Christian (and white): Christian nationalism, fear of ethnoracial outsiders, and intention to vote for Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election. Sociol. Religion 81:3272–93
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Baldassarri D, Bearman P. 2007. Dynamics of political polarization. Am. Sociol. Rev. 72:5784–811
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Baldassarri D, Gelman G. 2008. Partisans without constraint: political polarization and trends in American public opinion. Am. J. Sociol. 114:408–46
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Baldassarri D, Park B. 2020. Was there ever a culture war? Partisan polarization and secular trends in US public opinion. J. Politics 82:3809–27
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Bean L. 2014. The Politics of Evangelical Identity: Local Churches and Partisan Divides in the United States and Canada Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  16. Bellah RN. 1967. Civil religion in America. Daedalus 96:11–21
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Bolzendahl C, Coffe H. 2013. Are ‘good’ citizens ‘good’ participants? Testing citizenship norms and political polarization across 25 nations. Political Stud 61:45–65
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Bonikowski B, DiMaggio P. 2016. Varieties of American popular nationalism. Am. Sociol. Rev. 81:949–80
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Bonikowski B, Feinstein Y, Bock S. 2019. The partisan sorting of “America”: how nationalist cleavages shaped the 2016 U.S. presidential election. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/pmg95
    [Crossref]
  20. Boussalis C, Coan TG, Holman MR. 2021. Political speech in religious sermons. Politics Religion 14:2241–68
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Boutyline A, Willer R. 2017. The social structure of political echo chambers: variation in ideological homophily in online networks. Political Psychol. 38:3551–69
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Braunstein R. 2018. A (more) perfect union? Religion, politics, and competing stories of America. Sociol. Religion 79:2172–95
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Braunstein R. 2021. The “right” history: religion, race, and nostalgic stories of Christian America. Religions 12:295
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Braunstein R, Fuist TN, Williams RH, eds. 2017. Religion and Progressive Activism: New Stories about Faith and Politics New York: NYU Press
  25. Braunstein R, Taylor M. 2017. Is the Tea Party a ‘religious’ movement? Religiosity in the Tea Party versus the religious Right. Sociol. Religion 78:133–59
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Brewer MB, Pierce KP. 2005. Social identity complexity and outgroup tolerance. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 31:3428–37
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Brooks C, Manza J. 2004. A great divide? Religion and political change in U.S. national elections, 1972–2000. Sociol. Q. 45:3421–50
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Brooks C, Manza J. 2013. A broken public? Americans’ responses to the great recession. Am. Sociol. Rev. 78:5727–48
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Brubaker R. 2015. Religious dimensions of political conflict and violence. Sociol. Theory 33:11–19
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Burge RP. 2021. The Nones: Where They Came From, Who They Are, and Where They Are Going Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press
  31. Burke K, MillerMacPhee A 2021. Constructing pornography addiction's harms in science, news media, and politics. Soc. Forces 99:31334–62
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Campbell DE, Layman GC, Green JC. 2021. Secular Surge: A New Fault Line in American Politics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  33. Castle JJ, Stepp KK. 2021. Partisanship, religion, and issue polarization in the United States: a reassessment. Political Behav. 43:1311–35
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Chu J, Pink SL, Willer R. 2021. Religious identity cues increase vaccination intentions and trust in medical experts among American Christians. SocArXiv https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/7hrf2
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  35. Claassen RL, Djupe PA, Lewis AR, Neiheisel JR. 2021. Which party represents my group? The group foundations of partisan choice and polarization. Political Behav. 43:615–36
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Cofnas N, Carl N, Woodley of Menie MA. 2018. Does activism in social science explain conservatives’ distrust of scientists?. Am. Sociol. 49:135–48
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Converse PE. 1964. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. Ideology and Its Discontents DE Apter 206–61 New York: Free Press of Glencoe
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Corcoran KE, Scheitle CP, DiGregorio BD. 2021. Christian nationalism and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and update. Vaccine 39:456614–21
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Davis JT. 2019. Funding God's policies, defending whiteness: Christian nationalism and whites’ attitudes towards racially-coded government spending. Ethn. Racial Stud. 42:122123–42
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Davis JT, Perry SL. 2021. White Christian nationalism and relative political tolerance for racists. Soc. Probl. 68:3513–34
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Davis NJ, Robinson RV. 1996. Are the rumors of war exaggerated? Religious orthodoxy and moral progressivism in American. Am. J. Sociol. 102:3757–87
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Davis NT. 2018. Religion and partisan-ideological sorting, 1984–2016. Soc. Sci. Q. 99:41446–66
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Delehanty J, Edgell P, Stewart E. 2019. Christian America? Secularized evangelical discourse and the boundaries of national belonging. Social Forces 97:31283–306
     [Google Scholar]
  44. DellaPosta D, Shi Y, Macy M. 2015. Why do liberals drink lattes?. Am. J. Sociol. 120:51473–511
     [Google Scholar]
  45. DiMaggio P, Evans JH, Bryson B. 1996. Have American's social attitudes become more polarized?. Am. J. Sociol. 102:690–755
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Djupe PA, Gilbert CP. 2003. The Prophetic Pulpit: Clergy, Churches, and Communities in American Politics Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
  47. Du Bois WEB. 1990 (1903). The Souls of Black Folk New York: Vintage:
  48. Edgell P. 2017. An agenda for research on American religion in light of the 2016 election. Sociol. Religion 78:11–8
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Edgell P, Tranby E. 2007. Religious influences on understandings of racial inequality in the United States. Soc. Probl. 54:2263–88
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Edgell P, Tranby E. 2010. Shared visions? Diversity and cultural membership in American life. Soc. Probl. 57:2175–204
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Emerson MO, Smith C 2000. Divided by Faith: Evangelical Religion and the Problem of Race in America New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  52. Evans JH. 2003. Have Americans’ attitudes become more polarized? An update. Soc. Sci. Q. 84:71–90
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Evans JH. 2013. The growing social and moral conflict between conservative Protestantism and science. J. Sci. Study Religion 52:2368–85
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Evans JH, Hargittai E. 2020. Who doesn't trust Fauci? The public's belief in the expertise and shared values of scientists in the COVID-19 pandemic. Socius 6: https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120947337
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. Finkel E, Bail CA, Cikara M, Ditto PH, Iyengar S et al. 2020. Political sectarianism in America. Science 370:6516533–36
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Fiorina MP. 2017. Unstable Majorities: Polarization, Party Sorting, and Political Stalemate Stanford, CA: Hoover Inst. Press
  57. Fiorina MP, Abrams SJ. 2008. Political polarization in the American public. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 11:563–88
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Fischer CS, Mattson G. 2009. Is America fragmenting?. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 35:435–55
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Freelon D, Lokot T. 2020. Russian disinformation campaigns on Twitter target political communities across the spectrum. Collaboration between opposed political groups might be the most effective way to counter it. Misinformation Rev 1:1 http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42401973
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Froese P, Mencken FC. 2009. A U.S. holy war? The effects of religion on Iraq war policy attitudes. Soc. Sci. Q. 90:1103–16
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Gauchat G. 2012. Politicization of science in the public sphere: a study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. Am. Sociol. Rev. 77:2167–87
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Gauchat G. 2015. The political context of science in the United States: public acceptance of evidence-based policy and science funding. Soc. Forces 94:2723–46
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Gidron N, Bonikowski B. 2013. Varieties of populism: literature review and research agenda Work. Pap. 13–0004 Weatherhead Cent. Int. Aff., Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA:
  64. Gorski PS. 2017. American Covenant: A History of Civil Religion from the Puritans to the Present Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  65. Gorski PS, Perry SL. 2022. The Flag and the Cross: White Christian Nationalism and the Threat to American Democracy New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  66. Grzymala-Buss A. 2012. Why comparative politics should take religion (more) seriously. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 15:421–42
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Guhin J. 2014. Religion as site rather than religion as category: on the sociology of religion's export problem. Sociol. Religion 75:4579–93
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Guhin J. 2020. Agents of God: Boundaries and Authority in Muslim and Christian Schools New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  69. Gullickson A. 2018. The diverging beliefs and practices of the religiously affiliated and unaffiliated in the United States. Sociol. Sci. 5:361–79
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Guntuku SC, Buttenheim AM, Sherman G, Merchant RM 2021. Twitter discourse reveals geographical and temporal variation in concerns about COVID-19 vaccines in the United States. Vaccine 39:304034–38
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Hahl O, Kim M, Zuckerman Sivan EW. 2018. The authentic appeal of the lying demagogue: proclaiming the deeper truth about political illegitimacy. Am. Sociol. Rev. 83:11–33
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Hasen RL. 2019. Polarization and the judiciary. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 22:261–67
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Herberg W. 1955. Protestant, Catholic, Jew: An Essay in American Religious Sociology Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  74. Hetherington MJ. 2008. Turned off or turned on? How polarization affects political engagement. Red and Blue Nation? Consequences and Correction of America's Polarized Politics PS Nivola, DW Brady 1–53 Stanford, CA, and Washington, DC: Hoover Inst. and Brookings Inst.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Hoffmann JP, Miller AS. 1997. Social and political attitudes among religious groups: convergence and divergence over time. J. Sci. Study Religion 36:152–70
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Hoffmann JP, Miller AS. 1998. Denominational influences on socially divisive issues: polarization or continuity?. J. Sci. Study Religion 37:3528–46
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Hout M. 2021. America's liberal social climate and trends: change in 283 General Social Survey variables between and within U.S. birth cohorts, 1972–2018. Public Opin. Q 85:41009–49
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Hout M, Fischer CS. 2002. Why more Americans have no religious preference: politics and generations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 67:2165–90
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Hout M, Fischer CS. 2014. Explaining why more Americans have no religious preference: political backlash and generational succession, 1987–2012. Sociol. Sci. 1:423–47
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Hout M, Maggio C. 2021. Immigration, race & political polarization. Daedalus 150:240–55
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Hunter JD. 1991. Culture Wars New York: Basic
  82. Hunter JD. 1994. Before the Shooting Begins New York: Free Press
  83. Hunter JD. 2000. The Death of Character: Moral Education in an Age Without Good or Evil New York: Basic
  84. Inglehart R, Baker WE. 2000. Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. Am. Sociol. Rev. 65:119–51
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Iyengar S, Lelkes Y, Levendusky M, Malhotra N, Westwood SJ. 2019. The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 22:129–46
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Johnson EW, Schwadel P 2019. Political polarization and long-term change in public support for environmental spending. Soc. Forces 98:2913–39
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Kiley K, Vaisey S 2020. Measuring stability and change in personal culture using panel data. Am. Sociol. Rev. 85:3477–506
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Kozlowski AC. 2021. How conservatives lost confidence in science: the role of ideological alignment in political polarization. Soc. Forces. 2021:soab020
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Layman GC, Carsey TM, Horowitz JM. 2006. Party polarization in American politics: characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 9:83–110
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Lee FE. 2015. How party polarization affects governance. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 18:261–82
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Lelkes Y. 2016. Mass polarization: manifestations and measurements. Public Opin. Q. 80:S1392–410
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Levendusky MS, Pope JC. 2011. Red states versus blue states: going beyond the mean. Public Opin. Q. 75:2227–48
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Levitsky S, Ziblatt D. 2018. How Democracies Die New York: Broadway
  94. Lewis AR. 2017. The Rights Turn in Conservative Christian Politics: How Abortion Transformed the Culture Wars Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  95. Liu CC, Srivastava SB. 2015. Pulling closer and moving apart: interaction, identity, and influence in the U.S. Senate, 1973 to 2009. Am. Sociol. Rev. 80:1192–217
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Mann M, Schleifer C. 2020. Love the science, hate the scientists: conservative identity protects belief in science and undermines trust in scientists. Soc. Forces 99:1305–32
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Manza J, Brooks C. 1997. The religious factor in U.S. presidential elections, 1960–1992. Am. J. Sociol. 103:138–81
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Margolis MF. 2018. From Politics to the Pews: How Partisanship and the Political Environment Shape Religious Identity Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  99. Martí G. 2020. American Blindspot: Race, Class, Religion, and the Trump Presidency Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield
  100. Mason L. 2015. I disrespectfully agree: the differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. Am. J. Political Sci. 59:1128–45
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Mason L. 2016. A cross-cutting calm: how social sorting drives affective polarization. Public Opin. Q. 80:351–77
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Mason L. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  103. Mason L, Wronski J 2018. One tribe to bind them all: how our social group attachments strengthen partisanship. Political Psychol 39:257–77
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Mayrl D. 2018. The judicialization of religious freedom: an institutionalist approach. J. Sci. Study Religion 57:3514–30
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Mayrl D, Venny D. 2021. The dejudicialization of religious freedom?. Soc. Compass 68:3342–58
     [Google Scholar]
  106. McCarty N. 2019. Polarization: What Everyone Needs to Know Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  107. McCright A, Dunlap RE. 2011. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol. Q. 52:2155–94
     [Google Scholar]
  108. McDaniel EL, Ellison GC. 2008. God's party? Race, religion, and partisanship over time. Political Res. Q. 61:2180–91
     [Google Scholar]
  109. McDaniel EL, Nooruddin I, Shortle AF. 2011. Divine boundaries: how religion shapes citizens’ attitudes toward immigrants. Am. Political Res. 39:1205–33
     [Google Scholar]
  110. McVeigh R, Cunningham D, Farrell J. 2014. Political polarization as a social movement outcome: 1960s Klan activism and its enduring impact on political realignment in Southern counties, 1960 to 2000. Am. Sociol. Rev. 79:61144–71
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Mummolo J, Nall C. 2017. Why partisans do not sort: the constraints on political segregation. J. Politics 79:145–59
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Munson Z. 2008. The Making of Pro-Life Activists: How Social Movement Mobilization Works Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  113. Nisbet EC, Cooper KE, Garrett RK 2015. The partisan brain: how dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis)trust science. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 658:136–66
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Nojan S. 2022. Racialized religion and civic engagement: insights into intra-Muslim racial diversity on university campuses. Sociol. Religion 83:136–59
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Noy S, O'Brien TL. 2016. A nation divided: science, religion, and public opinion in the United States. Socius 2:1–15
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Oberhauser AM, Krier D, Kusow AM. 2019. Political moderation and polarization in the heartland: economics, rurality, and social identity in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Sociol. Q. 60:2224–44
     [Google Scholar]
  117. O'Brien J, Abdelhadi E. 2020. Re-examining restructuring: racialization, religious conservatism, and political leanings in contemporary American life. Soc. Forces 99:2474–503
     [Google Scholar]
  118. O'Brien TL, Noy S. 2015. Traditional, modern, and post-secular perspectives on science and religion in the United States. Am. Sociol. Rev. 80:192–115
     [Google Scholar]
  119. O'Brien TL, Noy S. 2020. Political identity and confidence in science and religion in the United States. Sociol. Religion 81:4439–61
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Park B. 2018. How are we apart? Continuity and change in the structure of ideological disagreement in the American public, 1980–2012. Soc. Forces 96:1757–84
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Patrikios S. 2008. American Republican religion? Disentangling the causal link between religion and politics in the United States. Political Behav. 30:367–89
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Pearce LD, Gilliland CC. 2020. Religion in America Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  123. Perry SL. 2022. Banning because of science or in spite of it? Scientific authority, religious conservatism, and support for outlawing pornography, 1984–2018. Soc. Forces 100:31385–414
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Perry SL, Baker JO, Grubbs JB. 2021a. Ignorance or culture war? Christian nationalism and scientific illiteracy. Public Understand. Sci. 30:8930–46
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Perry SL, Cobb RJ, Whitehead AL, Grubbs JB. 2021b. Divided by faith (in Christian America): Christian nationalism, race, and divergent perceptions of racial injustice. Soc. Forces. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soab134
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  126. Perry SL, Schnabel L, Grubbs JB. 2022. Christian nationalism, perceived anti-Christian discrimination, and prioritizing ‘religious freedom’ in the 2020 presidential election. Nations Natl 28:2714–25
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Perry SL, Whitehead AL. 2015. Christian nationalism and white racial boundaries: examining whites’ opposition to interracial marriage. Ethn. Racial Stud. 38:101671–89
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Perry SL, Whitehead AL. 2019. Christian America in black and white: racial identity, religious-national group boundaries, and explanations for racial inequality. Sociol. Religion 80:3277–98
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Perry SL, Whitehead AL, Grubbs JB. 2020. Culture wars and COVID-19 conduct: Christian nationalism, religiosity, and Americans’ behavior during the coronavirus pandemic. J. Sci. Study Religion 59:3405–16
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Perry SL, Whitehead AL, Grubbs JB. 2021c. Prejudice and pandemic in the promised land: how white Christian nationalism shapes Americans’ racist and xenophobic views of COVID-19. Ethn. Racial Stud. 44:5759–72
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Perry SL, Whitehead AL, Grubbs JB. 2021d. Save the economy, liberty, and yourself: Christian nationalism and Americans’ views on government COVID-19 restrictions. Sociol. Religion 82:4426–46
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Pierson P, Schickler E 2020. Madison's constitution under stress: a developmental analysis of political polarization. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 23:37–58
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Prior M. 2013. Media and political polarization. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 16:101–27
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Rhodes J. 2011. Choosing sides: an exploration of role conflict among evangelical Democrats. Sociol. Religion 72:128–49
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Schnabel L. 2016. Gender and homosexuality attitudes across religious groups from the 1970s to 2014: similarity, distinction, and adaptation. Soc. Sci. Res. 55:131–47
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Schnabel L. 2021. Opiate of the masses? Inequality, religion, and political ideology in the United States. Soc. Forces 99:3979–1012
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Schnabel L, Bock S. 2017. The persistent and exceptional intensity of American religion: a response to recent research. Sociol. Sci. 4:686–700
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Schradie J. 2019. The Revolution That Wasn't: How Digital Activism Favors Conservatives Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  139. Schwadel P. 2017. The republicanization of evangelical Protestants in the United States: an examination of the sources of political realignment. Soc. Sci. Res. 62:238–54
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Sherkat DE, Lehman D. 2018. Bad Samaritans: religion and anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim sentiment in the United States. Soc. Sci. Q. 99:51791–804
     [Google Scholar]
  141. Smith C. 1998. American Evangelicalism: Embattled and Thriving Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  142. Stewart E, Edgell P, Delehanty J. 2018. The politics of religious prejudice and tolerance for cultural others. Sociol. Q. 59:117–39
     [Google Scholar]
  143. Uecker JE, Lucke G. 2011. Protestant clergy and culture wars: an empirical test of Hunter's thesis. J. Sci. Study Religion 50:4692–706
     [Google Scholar]
  144. Vaisey S, Kiley K. 2021. A model-based method for detecting persistent cultural change using panel data. Sociol. Sci. 8:83–95
     [Google Scholar]
  145. Vaisey S, Lizardo O. 2010. Can cultural worldviews influence network composition?. Soc. Forces 88:41595–618
     [Google Scholar]
  146. Vann B Jr. 2021. Persuasive action and ideological polarization in Congress. Soc. Probl. 68:4809–30
     [Google Scholar]
  147. Voas D, Chaves M. 2018. Even intense religiosity is declining in the United States. Sociol. Sci. 5:694–710
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Vogl TS, Freese J. 2020. Differential fertility makes society more conservative on family values. PNAS 117:147696–701
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Whitehead AL, Perry SL. 2015. A more perfect union? Christian nationalism and support for same-sex unions. Sociol. Perspect. 58:422–40
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Whitehead AL, Perry SL. 2020a. How culture wars delay herd immunity: Christian nationalism and anti-vaccine attitudes. Socius 6: https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120977727
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  151. Whitehead AL, Perry SL 2020b. Taking America Back for God: Christian Nationalism in the United States New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  152. Whitehead AL, Perry SL, Baker JO 2018. Make America Christian again: Christian nationalism and voting for Donald Trump in 2016 presidential election. Sociol. Religion 79:2147–71
     [Google Scholar]
  153. Wilde MJ. 2018. Complex religion: interrogating assumptions of independence in the study of religion. Sociol. Religion 79:3287–98
     [Google Scholar]
  154. Wilde MJ, Glassman L. 2016. How complex religion can improve our understanding of American politics. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 42:407–25
     [Google Scholar]
  155. Wood RL, Fulton BR. 2015. A Shared Future: Faith-Based Organizing for Racial Equity and Ethical Democracy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  156. Wuthnow R. 1988. The Restructuring of American Religion: Society and Faith Since World War II Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  157. Wuthnow R. 1989. The Struggle for America's Soul: Evangelicals, Liberals, and Secularism Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans
  158. Wuthnow R. 2021. Why Religion is Good for American Democracy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  159. Yukich G, Edgell P, eds. 2020. Religion is Raced: Understanding American Religion in the Twenty-First Century New York: NYU Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-114239
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error