1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Sociology
  4. Volume 47, 2021
  5. Article

Annual Review of Sociology

Volume 47, 2021

Gender, Power, and Harassment: Sociology in the #MeToo Era

Abstract

This article examines what sociological research teaches us about gender, power, and harassment in the #MeToo era, showing how the sociological literature on harassment has both shaped and been shaped by legal definitions and scholarship. For instance, like case law, sociological research has tended to focus on the workplace to the exclusion of harassment in other spheres such as housing, as well as on sexual forms of harassment—despite evidence that nonsexual forms of sex-based harassment are even more common and just as harmful as sexual forms. While not all sociological studies of harassment employ an intersectional approach, those that do show that race and gender shape not only who is likely to be targeted but also how different people define and understand harassment. The sociological research suggests that mainstream organizational approaches to harassment fail to reduce rates of harassment and even elicit backlash but that some alternative approaches offer promise.

Keyword(s): gender harassment, law, power, professional hierarchy, sex discrimination, sex segregation, sex-based harassment, sexual harassment, workplace
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-031147
2021-07-31
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/47/1/annurev-soc-090320-031147.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-031147&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adams JH. 1997. Sexual harassment and Black women: a historical perspective. Sexual Harassment: Theory, Research, and Treatment213–24 Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Amar P. 2011. Turning the gendered politics of the security state inside out?. Int. Feminist J. Politics 13:3299–328
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Armstrong EA, Gleckman-Krut M, Johnson L 2018. Silence, power, and inequality: an intersectional approach to sexual violence. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 44:99–122
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Banneriji H. 1995. Thinking Through: Essays on Feminism, Marxism and Anti-Racism Toronto: Women's
  5. Banyard VL, Moynihan MM, Plante EG. 2007. Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: an experimental evaluation. J. Community Psychol. 35:4463–81
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Berdahl JL. 2007a. Harassment based on sex: protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. AMR 32:2641–58
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Berdahl JL. 2007b. The sexual harassment of uppity women. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:2425–37
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Berdahl JL, Moore C. 2006. Workplace harassment: double jeopardy for minority women. J. Appl. Psychol. 91:2426–36
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Berrey E. 2015. The Enigma of Diversity: The Language of Race and the Limits of Racial Justice Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  10. Berrey E, Nelson RL, Nielsen LB. 2017. Rights on Trial: How Workplace Discrimination Law Perpetuates Inequality Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  11. Blackstone A, Uggen C, McLaughlin H. 2009. Legal consciousness and responses to sexual harassment. Law Soc. Rev. 43:3631–68
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Buchanan NT 2005. The nexus of race and gender domination: the racialized sexual harassment of African American women. The Company of Men: Rediscovering the Links between Sexual Harassment and Male Domination JE Gruber, P Morgan 294–320 Boston: Northeastern Univ. PressUses the term racialized sexual harassment to capture Black women's experiences of harassment.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Buchanan NT, Ormerod AJ. 2002. Racialized sexual harassment in the lives of African American women. Women Ther 25:3–4107–24
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cares AC, Banyard VL, Moynihan MM, Williams LM, Potter SJ, Stapleton JG. 2014. Changing attitudes about being a bystander to violence: translating an in-person sexual violence prevention program to a new campus. Violence Against Women 21:165–87
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Chamberlain LJ, Crowley M, Tope D, Hodson R. 2008. Sexual harassment in organizational context. Work Occup 35:3262–95
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Christin A 2018. Counting clicks: quantification and variation in web journalism in the United States and France. Am. J. Sociol. 123:51382–415
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Collins PH. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment Boston: Unwin Hyman
  18. Collinson M, Collinson D. 1996.. “ It's only Dick”: the sexual harassment of women managers in insurance sales. Work Employ. Soc. 10:129–56
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Connell RW. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  20. Cooney S. 2017. Meet the woman who started #MeToo 10 years ago. TIME Oct. 19. https://time.com/4988282/me-too-tarana-burke-interview/
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cortina LM, Magley VJ. 2003. Raising voice, risking retaliation: events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 8:247–65
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Crenshaw K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist policies. Univ. Chicago Legal Forum 1989:1139–67
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Crenshaw K 1992. Whose story is it, anyway? Feminist and antiracist appropriations of Anita Hill. Race-ing Justice, En-gendering Power: Essays on Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas, and the Construction of Social Reality T Morrison 402–40 New York: Pantheon
     [Google Scholar]
  24. De Coster S, Estes SB, Mueller CW. 1999. Routine activities and sexual harassment in the workplace. Work Occup 26:121–49
     [Google Scholar]
  25. DeFour DC. 1996. The interface of racism and sexism on college campuses. Sexual Harassment on College Campuses: Abusing the Ivory Power MA Paludi 49–56 Albany: SUNY Press
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Dellinger K, Williams CL. 2002. The locker room and the dorm room: workplace norms and the boundaries of sexual harassment in magazine editing. Soc. Probl 49:2242–57Highlights how organizational power dynamics influence how workplace sexuality is understood and tolerated.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Denissen AM. 2010. The right tools for the job: constructing gender meanings and identities in the male-dominated building trades. Hum. Relations 63:71051–69
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Denissen AM, Saguy AC. 2014. Gendered homophobia and the contradictions of workplace discrimination for women in the building trades. Gender Soc 28:3381–403
     [Google Scholar]
  29. DeSouza E, Solberg J. 2004. Women's and men's reactions to man-to-man sexual harassment: Does the sexual orientation of the victim matter?. Sex Roles 50:9623–39
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Dobbin F, Kalev A. 2017. Training programs and reporting systems won't end sexual harassment. Promoting more women will. Harvard Business Review Nov. 15. https://hbr.org/2017/11/training-programs-and-reporting-systems-wont-end-sexual-harassment-promoting-more-women-will
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Dobbin F, Kalev A. 2019. The promise and peril of sexual harassment programs. PNAS 116:2512255–60
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Dobbin F, Kalev A. 2020. Why sexual harassment programs backfire. Harvard Business Review May–June. https://hbr.org/2020/05/why-sexual-harassment-programs-backfire
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Dobbin F, Kelly EL. 2007. How to stop harassment: professional construction of legal compliance in organizations. Am. J. Sociol. 112:41203–43
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Dobbin F, Sutton JR. 1998. The strength of a weak state: the rights revolution and the rise of human resources management divisions. Am. J. Sociol. 104:2441–76
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Edelman LB, Uggen C, Erlanger HS. 1999. The endogeneity of legal regulation: grievance procedures as rational myth. Am. J. Sociol. 105:2406–54
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Epstein LB. 1998. What is a gender norm and why should we care? Implementing a new theory in sexual harassment law. Stanford Law Rev 51:1161–82
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Farley L. 1978. Sexual Shakedown: The Sexual Harassment of Women on the Job New York: McGraw-Hill
  38. Fitzgerald LF, Shullman SL, Bailey N, Richards M, Swecker J et al. 1988. The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. J. Vocat. Behav. 32:2152–75
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Flynn G. 1997. A pioneer program nurtures a harassment free workplace. Workforce 76:1038–43
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Franke KM. 1997. What's wrong with sexual harassment?. Stanford Law Rev 49:4691–772
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Garcia SE. 2017. The woman who created #MeToo long before hashtags. New York Times Oct. 20. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/20/us/me-too-movement-tarana-burke.html
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Giuffre PA, Williams CL 1994. Boundary lines: labeling sexual harassment in restaurants. Gender Soc 8:3378–401
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Gruber J. 1998. The impact of male work environments and organizational policies on women's experiences of sexual harassment. Gender Soc 12:3301–20
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Hamilton LT, Armstrong EA, Seeley JL, Armstrong EM. 2019. Hegemonic femininities and intersectional domination. Soc. Theory 37:4315–41
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Hand JZ, Sanchez L. 2000. Badgering or bantering? Gender differences in experience of, and reactions to, sexual harassment among U.S. high school students. Gender Soc 14:6718–46
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Hanson R, Richards P. 2017. Sexual harassment and the construction of ethnographic knowledge. Sociol. Forum 32:3587–609Argues that sociological training in ethnography puts women ethnographers at risk of harassment.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Hanson R, Richards P. 2019. Harassed: Gender, Bodies, and Ethnographic Research Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  48. Harnois CE. 2015. Race, ethnicity, sexuality, and women's political consciousness of gender. Soc. Psychol. Q. 78:4365–86
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Hart CG. 2019. The penalties for self-reporting sexual harassment. Gender Soc 33:4534–59Shows that women who self-report harassment are less likely to be recommended for promotion.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Henson KD, Rogers JK. 2001.. “ Why Marcia you've changed!” Male clerical temporary workers doing masculinity in a feminized occupation. Gender Soc 15:2218–38
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Hirsch JS, Khan S. 2020. Sexual Citizens: A Landmark Study of Sex, Power, and Assault on Campus New York: WW Norton
  52. Hirsh CE, Kornrich S. 2008. The context of discrimination: workplace conditions, institutional environments, and sex and race discrimination charges. Am. J. Sociol. 113:51394–432
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Hirshman L. 2019. Reckoning: The Epic Battle Against Sexual Abuse and Harassment New York: HMH
  54. Hlavka HR. 2014. Normalizing sexual violence: young women account for harassment and abuse. Gender Soc 28:3337–58
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Hondagneau-Sotelo P. 2007. Domestica: Immigrant Workers Cleaning and Caring in the Shadows of Affluence Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  56. hooks b 1981. Ain't I a Woman?. Black Women and Feminism Boston: South End
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Jamieson KH. 1995. Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press. , 1st ed..
  58. Jaret C, Reitzes DC. 1999. The importance of racial-ethnic identity and social setting for Blacks, Whites, and multiracials. Sociol. Perspect. 42:4711–37
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Kalev A. 2009. Cracking the glass cages? Restructuring and ascriptive inequality at work. Am. J. Sociol. 114:61591–643
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Kalev A, Dobbin F, Kelly E 2006. Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71:4589–617
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Kalof L, Eby KK, Matheson JL, Kroska RJ 2001. The influence of race and gender on student self-reports of sexual harassment by college professors. Gender Soc 15:2282–302
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Katz J, Moore J. 2013. Bystander education training for campus sexual assault prevention: an initial meta-analysis. Violence Vict 28:61054–67
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Kettrey HH. 2019. The consequences of living in the #MeToo era. The Globe Post March 4. https://theglobepost.com/2019/03/04/consequences-metoo-era/
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Kihnley J. 2000. Unraveling the ivory fabric: institutional obstacles to the handling of sexual harassment complaints. Law Soc. Inq. 25:169–90
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Lerum K. 2004. Sexuality, power, and camaraderie in service work. Gender Soc 18:6756–76
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Leskinen EA, Cortina LM, Kabat DB. 2011. Gender harassment: broadening our understanding of sex-based harassment at work. Law Hum. Behav. 35:125–39Shows that most sex-based harassment is sexist but not sexualized.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Lopez R. 2017. Anita Hill on sexual harassment: “Today, more people would believe my story. .” Variety Dec. 8. https://variety.com/2017/biz/news/anita-hill-uta-sexual-harassment-1202634689/
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Lopez SH, Hodson R, Roscigno VJ. 2009. Power, status, and abuse at work: general and sexual harassment compared. Sociol. Q. 50:13–27
     [Google Scholar]
  69. MacKinnon C. 1979. Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. PressFirst to define sexual harassment as Title VII sex discrimination.
  70. Marshall A-M. 2003. Injustice frames, legality, and the everyday construction of sexual harassment. Law Soc. Inq. 28:3659–89
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Marshall A-M. 2005. Idle rights: employees’ rights consciousness and the construction of sexual harassment policies. Law Soc. Rev. 39:183–124
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Martin SE. 1994.. “ Outsider within” the station house: the impact of race and gender on black women police. Soc. Probl. 41:3383–400
     [Google Scholar]
  73. McCann C, Tomaskovic-Devey D, Badgett MVL. 2018. Employers’ responses to sexual harassment. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3407960
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  74. McLaughlin H, Uggen C, Blackstone A. 2012. Sexual harassment, workplace authority, and the paradox of power. Am. Sociol. Rev. 77:4625–47
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Mecca SJ, Rubin LJ. 1999. Definitional research on African American students and sexual harassment. Psychol. Women Q. 23:4813–17
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 1986.)
  77. Miller J. 2008. Getting Played New York: NYU PressShows how low-income Black girls navigate harassment in schools.
  78. Morgan LA, Martin KA. 2006. Taking women professionals out of the office: the case of women in sales. Gender Soc 20:1108–28
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Morgan PA. 1999. Risking relationships: understanding the litigation choices of sexually harassed women. Law Soc. Rev. 33:167–92
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Mueller CW, De Coster S, Estes SB. 2001. Sexual harassment in the workplace: unanticipated consequences of modern social control in organizations. Work Occup 28:4411–46
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Muñoz CB. 2008. Transnational Tortillas: Race, Gender, and Shop-Floor Politics in Mexico and the United States Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  82. Murrell AJ. 1996. Sexual harassment and women of color: issues, challenges, and future directions. Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Perspectives, Frontiers, and Response Strategies MS Stockdale 51–66 London: Sage
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Neville HA, Hamer J. 2001.. “ We make freedom”: an exploration of revolutionary Black feminism. J. Black Stud. 31:4437–61
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Nielsen LB. 2000. Situating legal consciousness: experiences and attitudes of ordinary citizens about law and street harassment. Law Soc. Rev. 34:41055–90
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshorer Services, 533 U.S. 75 1998.)
  86. Onwuachi-Willig A. 2018. What about #UsToo: the invisibility of race in the #MeToo movement. Yale Law J 128:105–20
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Orrico LA. 2015.. ‘ Doing intimacy’ in a public market: how the gendered experience of ethnography reveals situated social dynamics. Qual. Res. 15:4473–88
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Ortiz SY, Roscigno VJ. 2009. Discrimination, women, and work: processes and variations by race and class. Sociol. Q. 50:2336–59
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Pascoe CJ. 2005.. “ Dude, you're a fag”: adolescent masculinity and the fag discourse. Sexualities 8:3329–46
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Quinn BA. 2000. The paradox of complaining: law, humor, and harassment in the everyday work world. Law Soc. Inq. 25:41151–85
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Ravenelle AJ. 2019. Hustle and Gig: Struggling and Surviving in the Sharing Economy Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  92. Reed ME, Collinsworth LL, Fitzgerald LF. 2005. There's no place like home: sexual harassment of low income women in housing. Psychol. Public Policy Law 11:3439–62
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Reilly ME, Lott B, Gallogly SM. 1986. Sexual harassment of university students. Sex Roles J. Res. 15:7–8333–58
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Romero M. 2016. Maid in the USA New York: Routledge. , 2nd ed..
  95. Roscigno VJ. 2007. The Face of Discrimination: How Race and Sex Impact Work and Residential Lives New York: Rowman & Littlefield
  96. Roscigno VJ. 2019. Discrimination, sexual harassment, and the impact of workplace power. Socius 5:1–21
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Rospenda KM, Richman JA, Nawyn SJ 1998. Doing power: the confluence of gender, race, and class in contrapower sexual harassment. Gender Soc 12:140–60
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Russell K, Wilson M. 1996. Divided Sisters: Bridging the Gap Between Black Women and White Women New York: Doubleday:
  99. Saad L. 2017. Concerns about sexual harassment higher than in 1998. Gallup News Nov. 3. https://news.gallup.com/poll/221216/concerns-sexual-harassment-higher-1998.aspx
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Saguy AC. 2000. Employment discrimination or sexual violence? Defining sexual harassment in American and French law. Law Soc. Rev. 34:41091–128
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Saguy AC. 2002. Sexual harassment in the news: the United States and France. Commun. Rev. 5:2109–41
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Saguy AC. 2003. What Is Sexual Harassment? From Capitol Hill to the Sorbonne Berkeley: Univ. Calif. PressExamines how national, legal, and political traditions shape legal and popular definitions of harassment.
  103. Saguy AC. 2018. Europeanization or national specificity? Legal approaches to sexual harassment in France, 2002–2012. Law Soc. Rev. 52:2140–71
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Saguy AC. 2020. Come Out, Come Out, Whoever You Are Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  105. Salzinger L. 2000. Manufacturing sexual subjects: ‘harassment,’ desire and discipline on a maquiladora shopfloor. Ethnography 1:167–92
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Schudson M. 2003. The Sociology of the News New York: WW Norton
  107. Schultz V. 1998. Reconceptualizing sexual harassment. Yale Law J 107:61683–805Conceptualizes harassment as a tool of workplace sexism.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Schultz V. 2003. The sanitized workplace. Yale Law J 112:82061–193
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Schultz V. 2018. Reconceptualizing sexual harassment, again Public Law Res. Pap. 647 Yale Law Sch. New Haven, CT: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3165561
  110. Siegel R 2004. Introduction. Directions in Sexual Harassment Law C MacKinnon, R Siegel 1–39 New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Stainback K, Ratliff TN, Roscigno VJ. 2011. The context of workplace sex discrimination: sex composition, workplace culture and relative power. Soc. Forces 89:41165–88
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Tang CS, Yik MS, Cheung FM, Choi PK, Au KC. 1996. Sexual harassment of Chinese college students. Arch. Sex. Behav. 25:2201–15
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Tangri SS, Burt MR, Johnson LB. 1982. Sexual harassment at work: three explanatory models. J. Soc. Issues 38:433–54
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Tester G. 2008. An intersectional analysis of sexual harassment in housing. Gender Soc 22:3349–66Shows how poor women of color are especially vulnerable to sexual harassment in housing.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Texiera MT. 2002.. “ Who protects and serves me?” A case study of sexual harassment of African American women in one U.S. law enforcement agency. Gender Soc 16:4524–45
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Tinkler JE. 2008.. “ People are too quick to take offense”: the effects of legal information and beliefs on definitions of sexual harassment. Law Soc. Inq. 33:2417–45
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Tinkler JE. 2012. Resisting the enforcement of sexual harassment law. Law Soc. Inq. 37:11–24
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Tinkler JE, Gremillion S, Arthurs K. 2015. Perceptions of legitimacy: the sex of the legal messenger and reactions to sexual harassment training. Law Soc. Inq. 40:1152–74
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Tinkler JE, Li Y, Mollborn S. 2007. Can legal interventions change beliefs? The effect of exposure to sexual harassment policy on men's gender beliefs. Soc. Psychol. Q. 70:480–94
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Uggen C, Blackstone A. 2004. Sexual harassment as a gendered expression of power. Am. Sociol. Rev. 69:164–92
     [Google Scholar]
  121. US Equal Employ. Oppor. Comm 2019. Charges alleging sex-based harassment (charges filed with EEOC) FY 2010 - FY 2019. Rep., US Equal Employ. Oppor. Comm. Washington, DC. https://www.eeoc.gov/statistics/charges-alleging-sex-based-harassment-charges-filed-eeoc-fy-2010-fy-2019
    [Google Scholar]
  122. US Merit Syst. Protect. Board 1981. Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Is it a problem? Rep., US Merit Syst. Protect. Board Washington, DC:
     [Google Scholar]
  123. US Merit Syst. Protect. Board 1988. Sexual harassment in the federal government: an update. Rep., US Merit Syst. Protect. Board Washington, DC: https://www.mspb.gov/MSPBSEARCH/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=252435&version=252720&application=ACROBAT
  124. US Merit Syst. Protect. Board 1995. Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: trends, progress, continuing challenges. Rep., US Merit Syst. Protect. Board Washington, DC:
  125. Valian V. 1998. Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  126. Wade L. 2017. American Hookup: The New Culture of Sex on Campus New York: WW Norton
  127. Welsh S. 1999. Gender and sexual harassment. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 25:169–90
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Welsh S, Carr J, MacQuarrie B, Huntley A. 2006.. “ I'm not thinking of it as sexual harassment”: understanding harassment across race and citizenship. Gender Soc 20:187–107
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Williams CL. 1995. Still a Man's World: Men Who Do Women's Work Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  130. Williams CL 1997. Sexual harassment in organizations: a critique of current research and policy. Sexual Harassment and Sexual Consent BM Dank, R Refinetti 19–43 New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Williams CL. 2002. Sexual harassment and sadomasochism. Hypatia 17:299–117
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Williams CL. 2006. The unintended consequences of feminist legal reform: commentary on the sanitized workplace. Thomas Jefferson Law Rev 29:101–10
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Williams J, Short J, Brooks M, Hardcastle H, Ellis T, Saron R. 2019. What's reasonable now? Sexual harassment law after the norm cascade. Mich. State Law Rev. 2019:1139–224
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Yoder JD, Aniakudo P. 1995. The responses of African American women firefighters to gender harassment at work. Sex Roles 32:3–4125–37
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-031147
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error