1932

Abstract

This review answers recent calls to consider the transformative role of transnational professionals in contemporary globalization. It departs from the dominant perspective, which views professions as constrained by states’ geographical boundaries and by organizations such as nationally based professional associations. Transnational professionals have particular characteristics: they combine high-level abstract knowledge, high mobility across national and organizational settings, social and cultural capital, and distributed agency to shape global practices. Over the past two decades, a vibrant research stream has emerged on these professionals and their boundary-crossing work, raising new questions about agency, territoriality, and power. We examine transnational professionals across a range of occupations and sectors, as well as world regions, extracting the implications for sociological theory and methods. We outline a scholarly agenda highlighting the opportunity structures and likely trajectories for those who locate themselves in transnational professional spaces, suggesting how they can be investigated in future research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-112019-053842
2020-07-30
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/46/1/annurev-soc-112019-053842.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-112019-053842&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abbott A. 1988. The System of Professions Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  2. Abbott A. 1995. Sequence analysis: new methods for old ideas. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 21:93–113
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Abbott A. 2005. Linked ecologies: states and universities as environments for the professions. Sociol. Theory 23:245–74
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Andreotti A, Le Galès P, Fuentes F 2015. Globalized Minds, Roots in the City: Upper Middle Classes in European Cities Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell
  5. Ashley L, Empson L. 2013. Differentiation and discrimination: understanding social class and social exclusion in leading law firms. Hum. Relat. 66:219–44
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Babb SL. 2001. Managing Mexico: Economists from Nationalism to Neoliberalism Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  7. Baker C. 2018. NHS staff from overseas: statistics Brief. Pap. 7783, House Commons Libr London, UK: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7783
  8. Ban C, Seabrooke L, Freitas S 2016. Grey matter in shadow banking: international organizations and expert strategies in global financial governance. Rev. Int. Political Econ. 23:1001–33
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Barley S, Kunda G. 2004. Gurus, Hired Guns and Warm Bodies: Itinerant Experts in a Knowledge Economy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  10. Bauman Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity Cambridge, UK: Polity
  11. Beck U. 2008. Reframing power in the globalized world. Org. Stud. 29:793–804
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Beck U, Sznaider N. 2006. Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: a research agenda. Br. J. Sociol. 57:1–23
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bellini A, Maestripieri L. 2018. Professions within, between and beyond. Varieties of professionalism in a globalising world. Cambio 8:5–14
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bennhold K. 2017. Where Brexit hurts: the nurses and doctors leaving London. New York Times Nov. 21. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/21/world/europe/nhs-brexit-eu-migrants.html
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bigo D. 2016. Sociology of transnational guilds. Int. Political Sociol. 10:398–416
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Blanchard P, Bühlmann F, Gauthier J 2014. Advances in Sequence Analysis: Theory, Method, Applications 2 London: Springer
  17. Block-Lieb S, Halliday T. 2017. Global Lawmakers: International Organizations in the Crafting of World Markets Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  18. Blok A, Lindstrøm M, Meilvang M, Pedersen I 2018. Trans-local professional projects: re-scaling the linked ecology of expert jurisdictions. J. Prof. Organ. 5:106–22
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bourdieu P. 1996. The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  20. Bourdieu P, Wacquant L. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
  21. Boussard V. 2018. Professional closure regimes in the global age: the boundary work of professional services specializing in mergers and acquisitions. J. Prof. Organ. 5:279–96
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Boussebaa M, Faulconbridge J. 2018. Professional service firms as agents of economic globalization: a political perspective. J. Prof. Organ. 6:72–90
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Boussebaa M, Morgan G, Sturdy A 2012. Constructing global firms? National, transnational and neocolonial effects in international management consultancies. Org. Stud. 33:465–86
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Boussebaa M, Sinha S, Gabriel Y 2014. Englishization in offshore call centers: a postcolonial perspective. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 45:1152–69
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Brunsson N, Jacobsson B. 2000. A World of Standards Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  26. Bühlmann F, David T, Mach A 2013. Cosmopolitan capital and the internationalization of the field of business elites: evidence from the Swiss case. Cult. Sociol. 7:211–29
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Carr-Saunders A, Wilson P. 1933. The Professions Oxford, UK: Clarendon
  28. Carruthers BG, Halliday TC. 2006. Negotiating globalization: global scripts and intermediation in the construction of Asian insolvency regimes. Law Soc. Inq. 31:521–84
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Carter C, Spence C. 2014. Being a successful professional: an exploration of who makes partner in the Big 4. Contemp. Account. Res. 31:949–81
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Castells M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  31. CERN (Cent. Eur. Rech. Nucl.) 2017. CERN personnel statistics Rep., Dep. Hum. Resour CERN, Geneva: http://cds.cern.ch/record/2317058/files/CERN-HR-STAFF-STAT-2017-RESTR.pdf
  32. Chiarello E. 2011. Challenging professional self-regulation: social movement influence on pharmacy rulemaking in Washington State. Work Occ 38:303–39
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Clemens M, Pettersson G. 2008. New data on African health professionals abroad. Hum. Resour. Health 6:1
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Colic-Peisker V. 2010. Free floating in the cosmopolis? Exploring the identity-belonging of transnational knowledge workers. Glob. Netw. 10:467–88
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Collins H. 2017. Gravity's Kiss: The Detection of Gravitational Waves Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  36. Dennis S. 2006. Prospects for qualitative GIS at the intersection of youth development and participatory urban planning. Environ. Plan. A 38:2039–54
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Dezalay Y, Garth B. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  38. Dezalay Y, Garth B. 2011. Hegemonic battles, professional rivalries, and the international division of labor in the market for the import and export of state-governing expertise. Int. Political Sociol. 5:276–93
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ellersgaard CH, Lunding JA, Henriksen LF, Larsen AG 2019. Pathways to the power elite: the organizational landscape of elite careers. Sociol. Rev. 67:1170–92
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Evans J, Kunda G, Barley S 2004. Beach time, bridge time and billable hours: the temporal structure of technical contracting. Admin. Sci. Q. 49:1–38
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Evetts J. 2003. The sociological analysis of professionalism: occupational change in the modern world. Int. Sociol. 18:395–415
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Faulconbridge J, Cook A, Muzio D 2012. Learning to be a lawyer in transnational law firms: communities of practice, institutions and identity regulation. Glob. Netw. 12:48–70
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Faulconbridge J, Grubbauer M. 2015. Transnational building practices: knowledge mobility and the inescapable market. Glob. Netw. 15:275–87
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Faulconbridge J, Muzio D. 2011. Professions in a globalizing world: towards a transnational sociology of the professions. Int. Sociol. 27:136–52
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Faulconbridge J, Muzio D. 2014. Transnational corporations shaping institutional change: the case of English law firms in Germany. J. Econ. Geogr. 15:1195–226
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Favell A. 2008. Eurostars and Eurocities: Free Movement and Mobility in an Integrating Europe Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell
  47. Fechter A-M. 2007. Transnational Lives: Expatriates in Indonesia Farnham, UK: Ashgate
  48. Fourcade M. 2006. The construction of a global profession: the transnationalization of economics. Am. J. Sociol. 112:145–94
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Fourcade M, Savelsberg J. 2006. Introduction: global processes, national institutions, local bricolage: shaping law in an era of globalization. Law Soc. Inq. 31:513–19
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Freidson E. 1984. The changing nature of professional control. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 10:1–20
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Gil J, Adamson B. 2011. The English language in mainland China: a sociolinguistic profile. English Language Education Across Greater China A Feng 23–45 Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Go J 2011. Patterns of Empire: The British and American Empires, 1688 to the Present. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Go J, Krause M 2016. Fielding transnationalism: an introduction. Sociol. Rev. Monogr 64:6–30
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Gouldner A. 1979. The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class New York: Seabury
  55. Guerra A, Harrington B. 2018. Attitude-behavior consistency in tax compliance: a cross-national comparison. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 156:184–205
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Halliday T. 1987. Beyond Monopoly: Lawyers, State Crises, and Professional Empowerment Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  57. Halliday T, Carruthers B. 2007. The recursivity of law: global norm making and national lawmaking in the globalization of corporate insolvency regimes. Am. J. Sociol. 112:1135–202
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Hanlon G. 2004. Institutional forms and organizational structures: homology, trust and reputational capital in professional service firms. Organization 11:186–210
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Hanrieder T. 2019. How do professions globalize? Lessons from the Global South in US medical education. Int. Political Sociol. 13:296–314
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Harrington B. 2012. Trust and estate planning: a profession and its contribution to socio-economic inequality. Soc. Forum 27:825–46
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Harrington B. 2015a. Going global: professionals and the microfoundations of institutional change. J. Prof. Organ. 2:103–21
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Harrington B. 2015b. Immersion ethnography of elites. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research K Elsbach, R Kramer 134–42 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Harrington B. 2016. Capital without Borders: Wealth Management and the One Percent Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  64. Harrington B. 2017a. Habitus and the labor of representation among elite professionals. J. Prof. Organ. 4:282–301
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Harrington B. 2017b. Trusts and financialization. Socio-Econ. Rev. 15:31–63
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Harrington B. 2017c. Studying elite professionals in transnational settings. Professional Networks in Transnational Governance L Seabrooke, LF Henriksen 39–49 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Harrington B. 2018. Turning vice into virtue: institutional work and professional misconduct. Hum. Relat. 72:1464–96
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Harrington B, Strike V. 2018. Between kinship and commerce: fiduciaries and the institutional logics of family firms. Fam. Bus. Rev. 31:417–40
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Harris J. 2017. Achieving Access: Professional Movements and the Politics of Health Universalism Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  70. Helgadóttir O. 2016. The Bocconi boys go to Brussels: Italian economic ideas, professional networks and European austerity. J. Eur. Public Policy 23:392–409
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Henriksen LF. 2015. The global network of biofuel sustainability standards-setters. Environ. Politics 24:115–37
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Henriksen LF, Seabrooke L. 2016. Transnational organizing: issue professionals in environmental sustainability networks. Organization 23:722–41
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Hertz E. 1998. The Trading Crowd: An Ethnography of the Shanghai Stock Market Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  74. Heusinkveld S, Gabbioneta C, Werr A, Sturdy A 2018. Professions and (new) management occupations as a contested terrain: redefining jurisdictional claims. J. Prof. Organ. 5:248–61
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Hobsbawm E. 1998. The nation and globalization. Constellations 5:1–9
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Holmes D, Marcus G. 2005. Cultures of expertise and the management of globalisation: towards a re-functioning of ethnography. Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems A Ong, S Collier 235–52 Oxford, UK: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Hughes EC. 1958. Men and Their Work Glencoe, IL: Free
  78. Hughes EC. 1963. The professions. Daedalus 92:655–68
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Hunter R, Oswald A, Charlton B 2009. The elite brain drain. Econ. J. 119:F231–51
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Hydle KM, Hopwood N. 2019. Practices and knowing in transnational knowledge-intensive service provision. Hum. Relat. 72:1948–72
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Ioannidis J. 2004. Global estimates of high-level brain drain and deficit. FASEB J 18:936–39
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Juarez P, Robinson P, Matthews-Juarez P 2008. 100% access, zero health disparities, and GIS. J. Health Soc. Policy 16:155–67
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Jenson J, Santos B. 2000. Introduction: case studies and common trends in globalizations. Globalizing Institutions: Case Studies in Regulation and Innovation J Jenson, B Santos 9–26 Aldershot, UK: Ashgate
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Kauppi N, Madsen M. 2013. Transnational power elites: the new professionals of governance, law and security. Transnational Power Elites: The New Professionals of Governance, Law and Security N Kauppi, M Madsen 1–16 Abingdon, UK: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Kennedy D. 2018. A World of Struggle: How Power, Law, and Expertise Shape Global Political Economy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  86. Kentikelenis AE, Seabrooke L. 2017. The politics of world polity: script-writing in international organizations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 82:1065–92
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Kerr SP, Kerr W, Özden Ç, Parsons C 2016. Global talent flows. J. Econ. Perspect. 30:83–106
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Klimkeit D, Reihlen M. 2016. Local responses to global integration in a transnational professional service firm. J. Prof. Organ. 3:39–61
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Knorr Cetina K, Bruegger U 2002. Global microstructures: the virtual societies of financial markets. Am. J. Sociol. 107:905–50
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Larson M. 1977. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  91. Lazega E, Quintane E, Casenaz S 2017. Collegial oligarchy and networks of normative alignments in transnational institution building. Soc. Netw. 48:10–22
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Liu S, Emirbayer M. 2016. Field and ecology. Sociol. Theory. 34:62–79
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Liu S, Trubek D, Wilkins D 2016. Mapping the ecology of China's corporate legal sector: globalization and its impact on lawyers and society. Asian J. Law Soc. 3:273–97
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Mauss M, Durkheim É 1937. Morale professionnelle: trois leçons extraites d'un cours d'Émile Durkheim, de morale civique et professionnelle (1898–1900). Rev. Métaphys. Morale 44:527–44
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Maznevski ML, Chudoba KM. 2000. Bridging space over time: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 11:473–92
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Meyer JW. 2010. World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:1–20
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Meyer JW, Bromley P. 2013. The worldwide expansion of “organization. .” Sociol. Theory 31:366–89
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Mosse D. 2011. Introduction: the anthropology of expertise and professionals in international development. Adventures in Aidland: The Anthropology of Professionals in International Development D Mosse 1–32 Oxford, UK: Berghahn
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Mudge SL, Vauchez A. 2012. Building Europe on a weak field: law, economics, and scholarly avatars in transnational politics. Am. J. Sociol. 118:449–92
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Murphy R, Stausholm S. 2017. The Big Four: a study of opacity Rep., GUE/NGL–European United Left/Nordic Green Left Brussels:
  101. Muzio D, Brock D, Suddaby R 2013. Professions and institutional change: towards an institutionalist sociology of the professions. J. Manag. Stud. 50:699–721
    [Google Scholar]
  102. National Science Board 2018. Science and Engineering Indicators Alexandria, VA: NSF https://nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/assets/nsb20181.pdf
  103. Nilsson A. 2017. Treating market failure: access professionals in global health. Professional Networks in Transnational Governance L Seabrooke, LF Henriksen 165–81 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  104. O'Mahoney J, Sturdy A. 2016. Power and the diffusion of management ideas: the case of McKinsey & Co. Manag. Learn. 47:247–65
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Parsons T. 1939. The professions and social structure. Soc. Forces 17:457–67
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Peter S, Bartley A, Beddoe L 2017. Transnational social workers’ transition into receiving countries: what lessons can be learned from nursing and teaching. Eur. J. Soc. Work 22:1–14
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Polson E. 2016. Privileged Mobilities: Professional Migration, Geo-Social Media, and a New Global Middle Class New York: Peter Lang
  108. Quack S. 2007. Legal professionals and transnational law-making: a case of distributed agency. Organization 14:643–66
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Radcliffe VS, Spence C, Stein M, Wilkinson B 2018. Professional repositioning during times of institutional change: the case of tax practitioners and changing moral boundaries. Account. Organ. Soc. 66:45–59
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Ramirez C. 2010. Promoting transnational professionalism: forays of the “Big Firm” accounting community into France. Transnational Communities: Shaping Global Economic Governance ML Djelic, S Quack 174–96 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Reskin B, Roos P. 1990. Job Queues, Gender Queues Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
  112. Sassen S. 2001. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 2nd ed..
  113. Saxenian A. 2007. The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  114. Scott W. 2008. Lords of the dance: professionals as institutional agents. Organ. Stud. 29:219–38
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Seabrooke L. 2014. Epistemic arbitrage: transnational professional knowledge in action. J. Prof. Organ. 1:49–64
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Seabrooke L, Henriksen LF 2017. Professional Networks in Transnational Governance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  117. Seabrooke L, Sending OJ. 2019. Contracting development: managerialism and consultants in intergovernmental organizations. Rev. Int. Political Econ. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1616601
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  118. Seabrooke L, Tsingou E. 2014. Distinctions, affiliations, and professional knowledge in financial reform expert groups. J. Eur. Public Policy 21:389–407
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Sending OJ. 2015. The Politics of Expertise: Competing for Authority in Global Governance Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  120. Sheller M, Urry J. 2006. The new mobilities paradigm. Environ. Plan. A 38:207–26
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Silva T. 2018. Transnational Management and Globalised Workers: Nurses Beyond Human Resources Abingdon, UK: Routledge
  122. Smets M, Morris T, Greenwood R 2012. From practice to field: a multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Acad. Manag. J. 55:877–904
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Spence C, Carter C, Belal A, Husillos J, Dambrin C, Archel P 2016. Tracking habitus across a transnational professional field. Work Employ. Soc. 30:3–20
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Spence C, Dambrin C, Carter C, Husillos J, Archel P 2015. Global ends, local means: cross-national homogeneity in professional service firms. Hum. Relat. 68:765–88
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Spence C, Sturdy A, Carter C 2018. Professionals with borders: the relationship between mobility and transnationalism in global firms. Geoforum 91:235–44
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Stone D. 2013. Knowledge Actors and Transnational Governance: The Private-Public Policy Nexus in the Global Agora London: Springer
  127. Storme T, Faulconbridge J, Beaverstock J, Derudder B, Witlox F 2017. Mobility and professional networks in academia: an exploration of the obligations of presence. Mobilities 12:405–24
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Suddaby R, Cooper D, Robson K 2007. Transnational regulation of professional services: governance dynamics of field level organizational change. Account. Organ. Soc 32:333–62
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Suddaby R, Viale T. 2011. Professionals and field-level change: institutional work and the professional project. Curr. Sociol. 59:423–42
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Thistlethwaite J, Paterson M. 2016. Private governance and accounting for field-level networks. Environ. Plann. C 34:1197–221
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Timmermans S, Epstein S. 2010. A world of standards but not a standard world: toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:69–89
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Tsingou E. 2015. Club governance and the making of global financial rules. Rev. Int. Political Econ. 22:225–56
    [Google Scholar]
  133. Valdes J. 2008. Pinochet's Economists: The Chicago School of Economics in Chile Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  134. Valverde M. 2015. Chronotopes of Law: Jurisdiction, Scale and Governance New York: Routledge
  135. Van Gunten TS. 2015. Cohesion, consensus, and conflict: technocratic elites and financial crisis in Mexico and Argentina. Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 56:366–90
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Van Maanen J, Barley S 1984. Occupational communities: culture and control in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 6:287–365
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Weise K, Rai S. 2018. Engineers are leaving Trump's America for the Canadian Dream. Bloomberg Businessweek April 20. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-04-20/h-1b-workers-are-leaving-trump-s-america-for-the-canadian-dream
    [Google Scholar]
  138. Yeates N. 2012. Global care chains: a state of the art review and future directions in care transnationalization research. Glob. Netw. 12:135–54
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Young C. 2018. The Myth of Millionaire Tax Flight Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-112019-053842
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-112019-053842
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error