1932

Abstract

The rapid growth of the platform economy has provoked scholarly discussion of its consequences for the nature of work and employment. We identify four major themes in the literature on platform work and the underlying metaphors associated with each. Platforms are seen as entrepreneurial incubators, digital cages, accelerants of precarity, and chameleons adapting to their environments. Each of these devices has limitations, which leads us to introduce an alternative image of platforms: as permissive potentates that externalize responsibility and control over economic transactions while still exercising concentrated power. As a consequence, platforms represent a distinct type of governance mechanism, different from markets, hierarchies, or networks, and therefore pose a unique set of problems for regulators, workers, and their competitors in the conventional economy. Reflecting the instability of the platform structure, struggles over regulatory regimes are dynamic and difficult to predict, but they are sure to gain in prominence as the platform economy grows.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857
2020-07-30
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/46/1/annurev-soc-121919-054857.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ajunwa I, Greene D. 2019. Platforms at work: automated hiring platforms and other new intermediaries in the organization of work. Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 33: Work and Labor in the Digital Age SP Vallas, A Kovalainen 61–91 Bingley, UK: Emerald
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alderman L. 2019. Food-delivery couriers exploit desperate migrants in France. New York Times June 16. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/16/business/uber-eats-deliveroo-glovo-migrants.html
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen-Robertson J. 2017. The Uber game: exploring algorithmic management and resistance Paper presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers Tartu, Estonia: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/20603/
  4. Aneesh A. 2009. Global labor: algocratic modes of organization. Sociol. Theory 27:4347–70
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Attwood-Charles W. 2019. Dimensions of platform labor control and the experience of gig couriers Paper presented at Fathomless Futures: Algorithmic and Imagined New York: June 27
  6. Beck U. 2000. The Brave New World of Work Cambridge, UK: Polity
  7. Benjamin R. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code Cambridge, UK: Polity
  8. Benkler Y. 2016. The realism of cooperativism. Ours to Hack and to Own: The Rise of Platform Cooperativism, a New Vision for the Future of Work and a Fairer Internet T Scholz, N Schneider 91–95 New York: OR Books
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Benkler Y. 2017. Peer production, the commons, and the future of the firm. Strateg. Organ. 15:2264–74
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Berg J. 2016. Income security in the on-demand economy: policy lessons from a survey of crowdworkers. Comp. Labor Law Policy J. 37:543–76
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Berg J, de Stefano V 2018. Employment and regulation for clickworkers. Work in the Digital Age: Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution M Neufeind, J O'Reilly, F Ranft 175–84 London: Rowman Littlefield
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Berg J, Rani U. 2018. Digital labour platforms and the future of work: towards decent work in the online world Rep., Int. Labour Organ. Geneva: https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_645337/lang–en/index.htm
  13. Bodie MT, Cherry MA, McCormick ML, Tang J 2016. The law and policy of people analytics. Univ. Colo. Law Rev. 88:4961–1042
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Borkholder J, Montgomery M, Chen MS, Smith R 2018. Uber state interference: how transportation network companies buy, bully, and bamboozle their way to deregulation Rep., Nat. Employ. Law Proj. New York: https://www.nelp.org/publication/uber-state-interference/
  15. Brynjolffson E, McAfee A. 2014. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies New York: W. W. Norton
  16. Calo R, Rosenblat A. 2017. The taking economy: Uber, information, and power. Columbia Law Rev 117:61623–90
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cameron LD. 2018. Making out while driving: control, coordination, and its consequences in algorithmic work Work. Pap., Univ. Mich. Ann Arbor, MI:
  18. Cameron LD. 2019. The rise of algorithmic work: implications for managerial control and career pathways PhD Diss., Univ. Mich. Ann Arbor, MI:
  19. Cansoy M. 2018. “Sharing” in unequal spaces: short-term rentals and the reproduction of urban inequalities PhD Diss., Boston Coll. Boston:
  20. Chen JY. 2018. Thrown under the bus and outrunning it! The logic of Didi and taxi drivers’ labour and activism in the on-demand economy. New Media Soc 20:82691–711
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen MK, Chevalier JA, Rossi PE, Oehlsen E 2017. The value of flexible work: evidence from Uber drivers NBER Work. Pap 23296
  22. Chen Y, Cheung ASY. 2017. The transparent self under big data profiling: privacy and Chinese legislation on the social credit system. J. Comp. Law 12:2356–78
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Cheney-Lippold J. 2011. A new algorithmic identity: soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory Cult. Soc. 28:6164–81
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Cherry MA. 2016. Beyond misclassification: the digital transformation of work. Comp. Labor Law Policy J. 37:3577–602
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Chinoy E. 1992. Automobile Workers and the American Dream Champaign-Urbana, IL: Univ. Ill. Press, 2nd ed..
  26. Christin A. 2018. Counting clicks: quantification and variation in web journalism in the United States and France. Am. J. Sociol. 123:51382–415
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Cockayne DG. 2016. Sharing and neoliberal discourse: the economic function of sharing in the digital on-demand economy. Geoforum 77:73–82
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Collier RB, Dubal VB, Carter CL 2017. Labor platforms and gig work: the failure to regulate Work. Pap. 106-17, Inst. Res. Labor Employ., Univ. Calif. Berkeley: http://www.irle.berkeley.edu/files/2017/Labor-Platforms-and-Gig-Work.pdf
  29. Collier RB, Dubal VB, Carter CL 2018. Disrupting regulation, regulating disruption: the politics of Uber in the United States. Perspect. Politics 16:4919–37
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Corporaal GF, Lehdonvirta V. 2017. Platform sourcing: how Fortune 500 firms are adopting online freelancing platforms Rep., Oxf. Internet Inst. Oxford, UK: https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/publications/platform-sourcing.pdf
  31. Cui R, Li J, Zhang D 2016. Reducing discrimination with reviews in the sharing economy: evidence from field experiments on Airbnb. Manag. Sci. 66:1005–507
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Culpepper PD, Thelen K. 2019. Are we all Amazon Primed? Consumers and the politics of platform power. Comp. Political Stud. 53:288–318
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Davis GF. 2016a. The Vanishing American Corporation: Navigating the Hazards of a New Economy San Francisco: Berrett-Kohler
  34. Davis GF. 2016b. What might replace the modern corporation? Uberization and the web page enterprise. Seattle Univ. Law Rev. 39:501–15
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Drahokoupil J, Piasna A. 2019. Work in the platform economy: Deliveroo riders in Belgium and the SMart arrangement Work. Pap. 2019.01, Eur. Trade Union Inst Brussels:
  36. Dubal V. 2019. Why the Uber strike was a triumph. Slate May 10. https://slate.com/technology/2019/05/uber-strike-victory-drivers-network.html
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Dubal VB. 2017a. Wage-slave or entrepreneur? Contesting the dualism of legal worker categories. Calif. Law Rev. 105:65–126
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Dubal VB. 2017b. Winning the battle, losing the war: assessing the impact of misclassification litigation on workers in the gig economy. Wis. Law Rev. 239:739–802
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Dube A, Jacobs J, Naidu S, Suri S 2018. Monopsony in online labor markets NBER Work. Pap 24416
  40. Duffy BE. 2017. (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
  41. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 4 Cal. 5th 903 2018. https://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/2018/s222732.html
  42. Edwards R. 1980. Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century New York: Basic Books
  43. Einav L, Farronato C, Levin J 2016. Peer-to-peer markets. Annu. Rev. Econ. 8:615–35
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Ettlinger N. 2017. Paradoxes, problems and potentialities of online work platforms. Work Organ. Labour Glob. 11:221–34
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Eubanks V. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor New York: St. Martin's
  46. Farrell D, Greig F, Hamoudi A 2018. The online platform economy in 2018: drivers, workers, sellers, and lessors Work. Pap JPMorgan Chase Inst.
  47. Farrell D, Greig FE. 2016. The online platform economy: Has growth peaked? Work. Pap JPMorgan Chase Inst.
  48. Forde C, Stuart M, Joyce S 2017. The social protection of workers in the platform economy Rep. PE 614.184. Euro. Parliam. Brussels: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/614184/IPOL_STU(2017)614184_EN.pdf
  49. Fourcade M, Healy K. 2017. Seeing like a market. Socio-Econ. Rev. 15:19–29
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Frenken K. 2017. Political economies and environmental futures for the sharing economy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 375:209520160367
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Frenken K, Schor JB. 2017. Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 23:3–10
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Gerber C, Krzywdzinkski M. 2019. Brave new digital work? New forms of performance control in crowdwork. Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 33: Work and Labor in the Digital Age SP Vallas, A Kovalainen 121–45 Binkley, UK: Emerald
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Graham M, Woodcock J, Heeks R, Fredman S, du Toit D et al. 2019. The Fairwork Foundation: strategies for improving platform work. Proceedings of the Weizenbaum Conference 2019: Challenges of Digital Inequality: Digital Education, Digital Work, Digital Life89–96 Berlin: Weizenbaum Inst. Netw. Soc.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Gray ML, Suri S. 2019. Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass Boston: Houghton Mifflin
  55. Gray ML, Suri S, Ali SS, Kulkarni D 2016. The crowd is a collaborative network. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing134–47 New York: Assoc. Comput. Mach.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Hacker JS. 2008. The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press, 2nd ed..
  57. Hall JV, Krueger AB. 2018. An analysis of the labor market for Uber's driver-partners in the United States. ILR Rev 71:3705–32
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Hamper B. 1991. Rivethead: Tales from the Assembly Line New York: Warner Books
  59. Hannák A, Wagner C, Garcia D, Mislove AE, Strohmaier M, Wilson C 2017. Bias in online freelance marketplaces: evidence from TaskRabbit and Fiverr. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing1914–33 Portland, OR: Assoc. Comput. Mach.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Harvey D. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  61. [Google Scholar]
  62. Horton JJ, Zeckhauser RJ. 2016. Owning, using and renting: some simple economics of the “sharing economy.” NBER Work. Pap. 22029
  63. Huang N, Burtch G, Hong Y, Pavlou PA 2018. Unemployment and worker participation in the gig economy: evidence from an online labor platform SSRN Work. Pap. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3105090
  64. Huws U, Spencer NH, Syrdal DS, Holts K 2017. Work in the European gig economy Rep., Found. Eur. Progress. Stud Brussels: https://www.feps-europe.eu/Assets/Publications/PostFiles/579_1.pdf
  65. Irani LC. 2015. Difference and dependence among digital workers: the case of Amazon Mechanical Turk. South Atl. Q. 114:1225–34
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Irani LC, Silberman MS. 2015. Turkopticon: interrupting worker invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems611–20 Paris: Assoc. Comput. Mach.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Jarrahi MH, Sutherland W. 2019. Algorithmic management and algorithmic competencies: understanding and appropriating algorithms in gig work. Information in Contemporary Society N Taylor, C Christian-Lamb, M Martin, B Nardi 578–89 Cham, Switz.: Springer Int.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Joyce S, Stuart M, Forde C 2019. Theorising platform worker resistance Paper presented at Fathomless Futures: Algorithmic and Imagined New York: June 28
  69. Kalleberg AL. 2013. Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s New York: Russell Sage Found.
  70. Kalleberg AL. 2018. Precarious Lives: Job Insecurity and Well-Being in Rich Democracies Cambridge, UK: Polity
  71. Kalleberg AL, Vallas SP. 2018. Introduction. Probing Precarious Work: Theory, Research, and Politics AL Kalleberg, SP Vallas 1–30 Binkley, UK: Emerald
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Kelkar S. 2018. Engineering a platform: the construction of interfaces, users, organizational roles, and the division of labor. New Media Soc 20:72629–46
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Kellogg K. 2011. Challenging Operations: Medical Reform and Resistance in Surgery Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  74. Kenney M, Zysman J. 2015. Choosing a future in the platform economy: the implications and consequences of digital platforms Paper presented at the Kauffman Foundation New Entrepreneurial Growth Conference, Amelia Isl., Fla June 18–19 https://brie.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/platformeconomy2distributejune21.pdf
  75. Kenney M, Zysman J. 2016. The rise of the platform economy. Issues Sci. Technol. 32:361–69
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Kenney M, Zysman J. 2019. Work and value creation in the platform economy. Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 33: Work and Labor in the Digital Age SP Vallas, A Kovalainen 13–41 Binkley, UK: Emerald
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Khan LM. 2017. Amazon's antitrust paradox. Yale Law J 126:710–805
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Kirchner S, Schüßler E. 2020. Regulating the sharing economy: a field perspective. In Theorizing the Sharing Economy: Variety and Trajectories of New Forms of Organizinged. I Maurer, J Mair, A Oberg215–36 Res. Sociol. Organ. 66 Melbourne, Aust.: Emerald
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Kornberger M, Pflueger D, Mouritsen J 2017. Evaluative infrastructures: accounting for platform organization. Account. Organ. Soc. 60:79–95
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Kuhn KM, Maleki A. 2017. Micro-entrepreneurs, dependent contractors, and instaserfs: understanding online labor platform workforces. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 31:3183–200
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Ladegaard I, Ravenelle A, Schor JB 2018. Provider vulnerability in the sharing economy Work. Pap. Boston Coll., Boston:
  82. Landes DS. 1986. What do bosses really do. J. Econ. Hist. 46:3585–623
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Lane CA. 2011. A Company of One: Insecurity, Independence, and the New World of White-Collar Unemployment Cornell, NY: ILR
  84. Lehdonvirta V. 2018. Flexibility in the gig economy: managing time on three online piecework platforms. New Technol. Work Employ. 33:113–29
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Leidner R. 1993. Fast Food, Fast Talk Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  86. Lobo S. 2014. S.P.O.N.—Die Mensch-Maschine: Auf dem Weg in die Dumpinghölle. Spiegel Netzwelt March 9. http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/sascha-lobo-sharing-economy-wie-bei-uber-ist-plattform-kapitalismus-a-989584.html
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Manriquez M. 2019. Work-games in the gig-economy: a case study of Uber drivers in the city of Monterrey, Mexico. Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 33: Work and Labor in the Digital Age SP Vallas, A Kovalainen Bingley, UK: Emerald
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Manyika J, Lund S, Bughin J, Robinson K, Mischke J, Mahajan D 2016. Independent work: choice, necessity and the gig economy Rep., McKinsey Glob. Inst New York: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/independent-work-choice-necessity-and-the-gig-economy
  89. Marglin SA. 1974. What do bosses do? The origins and functions of hierarchy in capitalist production. Rev. Radic. Political Econ. 6:260–112
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Marwick AE. 2013. Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity and Branding in the Social Media Age New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  91. Mays JC. 2018. Uber gains civil rights allies against New York's proposed freeze: “It's a racial issue. New York Times July 29. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/29/nyregion/uber-cap-civil-rights.html
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Miller M, Bernstein EH. 2017. New frontiers of worker power: challenges and opportunities in the modern economy Rep., Roosevelt Inst New York: https://rooseveltinstitute.org/new-frontiers-worker-power/
  93. Mishel L. 2018. Uber and the labor market Rep. 145552, Econ. Policy Inst Washington, DC: https://www.epi.org/publication/uber-and-the-labor-market-uber-drivers-compensation-wages-and-the-scale-of-uber-and-the-gig-economy/
  94. Neff G. 2012. Venture Labor: Work and the Burden of Risk in Innovative Industries Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  95. Neff G, Wissinger E, Zukin S 2005. Entrepreneurial labor among cultural producers: “cool” jobs in “hot” industries. Soc. Semiotics 15:3307–34
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Noble SU. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism New York: New York Univ. Press
  97. Osnowitz D. 2011. Freelancing Expertise: Contract Professionals in the New Economy Ithaca, NY: Cornell/ILR
  98. Parker G, Van Alstyne M, Choudary SP 2016. Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You New York: W. W. Norton
  99. Parrott JA, Reich M. 2018. An earnings standard for New York City's app-based drivers Rep., Cent. New York City Aff New York:
  100. Pasquale F. 2015. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  101. Pasquale F. 2016. Two narratives of platform capitalism. Yale Law Policy Rev 35:1309–19
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Pesole A, Urzí Brancati MC, Fernández-Macías E, Biagi F, González Vázquez I 2018. Platform workers in Europe Tech. Rep., EUR 29275 EN. Luxembourg, Luxembg.: Publ Off. Eur. Union:
  103. Pew Res. Cent 2016. Gig work, online selling and home sharing Rep., Pew Res. Cent Washington, DC: http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/17/gig-work-online-selling-and-home-sharing/
  104. Polanyi K. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time New York: Farrar Rinehart
  105. Powell WW. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Res. Organ. Behav. 12:295–336
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Pugh A. 2015. Tumbleweed Society: Working and Caring in an Age of Insecurity Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  107. Rahman H. 2018. Invisible cages: algorithmic evaluations in online labor markets. PhD Diss., Stanford Univ. Stanford, CA:
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Rahman KS. 2016. The shape of things to come: the on-demand economy and the normative stakes of regulating 21st-century capitalism. Eur. J. Risk Regul. 7:4652–63
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Rahman KS, Thelen K. 2019. The rise of the platform business model and the transformation of twenty-first-century capitalism. Politics Soc 47:2177–204
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Ravenelle AJ. 2019. Hustle and Gig: Struggling and Surviving in the Sharing Economy Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  111. Robinson HC. 2017. Making a digital working class: Uber drivers in Boston, 2016–2017. PhD Thesis, Mass. Inst. Tech Cambridge, MA:
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Rogers B. 2016. Employment rights in the platform economy: getting back to basics. Harv. Law Policy Rev. 10:479–520
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Rosenblat A. 2018. Uberland: How Algorithms Are Re-Writing the Rules of Work Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  114. Rosenblat A, Stark L. 2016. Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: a case study of Uber's drivers. Int. J. Commun. 10:3758–84
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Scheiber N. 2017. How Uber uses psychological tricks to push its drivers’ buttons. New York Times April 2. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/04/02/technology/uber-drivers-psychological-tricks.html
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Schneider N. 2018. An Internet of ownership: democratic design for the online economy. Sociol. Rev. Monogr. 66:2320–40
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Scholz T. 2016a. Platform cooperativism: challenging the corporate sharing economy Rep., Rosa Luxembg. Stift New York: http://www.rosalux-nyc.org/wp-content/files_mf/scholz_platformcoop_5.9.2016.pdf
  118. Scholz T. 2016b. Uberworked and Underpaid: How Workers are Disrupting the Digital Economy Cambridge, UK: Polity
  119. Scholz T, Schneider N 2016. Ours to Hack and to Own: The Rise of Platform Cooperativism, a New Vision for the Future of Work and a Fairer Internet New York: OR Books
  120. Schor JB. 2014. Debating the sharing economy. Great Transition Initiative Oct. https://greattransition.org/publication/debating-the-sharing-economy
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Schor JB. 2020. After the Gig: How the Sharing Economy Got Hijacked and How to Win It Back Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  122. Schor JB, Cansoy M, Charles W, Ladegaard I, Wengronowitz R 2019. Dependence and precarity in the platform economy Work. Pap., Boston Coll Boston:
  123. Secur. Exch. Comm 2019. Form S-1 registration document under the Securities Act of 1933: Uber Technologies, Inc Regist. No. 333. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1543151/000119312519103850/d647752ds1.htm
  124. Sewell G. 1998. The discipline of teams: the control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Adm. Sci. Q. 43:2397–428
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Shapiro A. 2018. Between autonomy and control: strategies of arbitrage in the “on-demand” economy. New Media Soc 20:82954–71
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Sharone O. 2017. LinkedIn or LinkedOut? How social networking sites are reshaping the labor market. Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 30: Emerging Conceptions of Work, Firms and the Labor Market SP Vallas, A Kovalainen 1–33 Binkley, UK: Emerald
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Shestakofsky B. 2017. Working algorithms: software automation and the future of work. Work Occup 44:4376–423
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Silver BJ. 2003. Forces of Labor: Workers’ Movements and Globalization Since 1870 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  129. Smith V. 2001. Crossing the Great Divide: Worker Risk and Opportunity in the New Economy Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  130. Smith V. 2010. Enhancing employability: human, cultural, and social capital in an era of turbulent unpredictability. Hum. Relat. 63:2279–300
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Söderqvist F. 2017. A Nordic approach to regulating intermediary online labour platforms. Transfer: Eur. Rev. Labour Res. 23:3349–52
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Söderqvist F. 2018. Sweden: Will history lead the way in the age of robots and platforms?. Work in the Digital Age: Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution M Neufeind, J O'Reilly, F Ranft 295–304 London: Rowman Littlefield
    [Google Scholar]
  133. Srnicek N. 2016. Platform Capitalism Cambridge, UK/Malden, MA: Polity
  134. Sulakshana E, Eddy S, Schor JB 2018. Democratic governance in the sharing economy: a case study of a platform cooperative, Stocksy United Work. Pap., Boston Coll Boston:
  135. Sundararajan A. 2016. The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  136. Sweeney S. 2019. Uber drivers across the U.S. are manipulating fares to create artificial price surges. WJLA/ABC7 June 13. https://wjla.com/features/7-on-your-side/uber-drivers-nationwide-manipulating-fares-artificial-surges
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Thelen K. 2018. Regulating Uber: the politics of the platform economy in Europe and the United States. Perspect. Politics 16:4938–53
    [Google Scholar]
  138. UCLA Inst. Res. Labor Employ 2018. More than a gig: a survey of ride-hailing drivers in Los Angeles Rep., UCLA Inst. Res. Labor Employ Los Angeles:
  139. Vallas SP. 2019. Platform capitalism: What's at stake for workers. New Labor Forum 28:148–59
    [Google Scholar]
  140. Vallas SP, Christin A. 2018. Work and identity in an era of precarious employment: how workers respond to “personal branding” discourse. Work Occup 45:13–37
    [Google Scholar]
  141. Vallas S, Prener C. 2012. Dualism, job polarization, and the social construction of precarious work. Work Occup 39:4331–53
    [Google Scholar]
  142. van Dijck J. 2013. ‘You have one identity’: performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn. Media Cult. Soc. 35:2199–215
    [Google Scholar]
  143. van Doorn N. 2017. Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the “on-demand” economy. Inf. Commun. Soc. 20:6898–914
    [Google Scholar]
  144. van Doorn N. 2018. Late for a job in the gig economy? Handy will dock your pay. Quartz at Work October 3. https://qz.com/work/1411833/handy-charges-fees-to-its-workers-for-being-late-or-canceling-jobs/
    [Google Scholar]
  145. Walker CR, Guest RH. 1956. The Man on the Assembly Line Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  146. Walker ET. 2016. Between grassroots and “astroturf”: understanding mobilization from the top-down. The SAGE Handbook of Resistance D Courpasson, S Vallas 269–79 Los Angeles: SAGE
    [Google Scholar]
  147. Watkins EA, Stark D. 2018. The Möbius organizational form: make, buy, cooperate or co-opt. Sociologica 12:165–80
    [Google Scholar]
  148. Wells K, Attoh K, Cullen D 2019. The Uber workplace in D.C. Rep., Kalmanowitz Initiat. Labor Work. Poor, Georgetown Univ Washington, DC: https://lwp.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/Uber-Workplace.pdf
  149. Wolff KH 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel New York: Free Press
  150. Wood AJ, Graham M, Lehdonvirta V, Hjorth I 2018. Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work Employ. Soc. 33:156–75
    [Google Scholar]
  151. Wood AJ, Graham M, Lehdonvirta V, Hjorth I 2019. Networked but commodified: the (dis)embeddedness of digital labour in the gig economy. Sociology 53:5931–50
    [Google Scholar]
  152. Zanoni P. 2019. Labor market inclusion through predatory capitalism? The “sharing economy”, diversity, and the crisis of social reproduction in the Belgian coordinated market economy. Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 33: Work and Labor in the Digital Age SP Vallas, A Kovalainen Binkley, UK: Emerald
    [Google Scholar]
  153. Zervas G, Proserpio D, Byers J 2015. A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average SSRN Work. Pap. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2554500
  154. Zuboff S. 2015. Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. J. Inf. Technol. 30:175–89
    [Google Scholar]
  155. Zuboff S. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism New York: PublicAffairs
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error