1932

Abstract

Globalization of law may be defined as the worldwide progression of transnational legal structures and discourses along the dimensions of extensity, intensity, velocity, and impact. We propose that a theory of the global penetration of law will require at least four elements—actors, mechanisms, power, and structures and arenas. A comparison of four approaches to globalization and law—world polity, world systems, postcolonial globalism, and law and economic development—indicates considerable variation in perceived outcomes and gaps in explanation, but with possible complementarities in both outcomes and explanatory factors. Research demonstrates that globalization is variably contested in several domains of research on law: () the construction and regulation of global markets, () crimes against humanity and genocide, () the diffusion of political liberalism and constitutionalism, and () the institutionalization of women's rights. We propose that the farther globalizing legal norms and practices are located from core local cultural institutions and beliefs, the less likely global norms will provoke explicit contestation and confrontation. Future research will be productively directed to where and how global law originates, how and when global norms and law are transmitted and enforced, and how global-local settlements are negotiated.

Keyword(s): globalizationlawsocial change
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123136
2006-08-11
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123136
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123136
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error