1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Anthropology
  4. Volume 50, 2021
  5. Article

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volume 50, 2021

Language and the Military: Necropolitical Legitimation, Embodied Semiotics, and Ineffable Suffering

Abstract

This article augments and complicates Nelson's claim that “we talk our way into war and talk our way out of it” (Dedaić & Nelson 2003, p. 459). Military endeavors require verbal legitimation, but militarizing participants and wide swaths of the civilian population requires more than just a stated rationale. It requires the complex construction of acquiescent selves and societies through linguistic maneuvers that present themselves with both brute force and subtlety to enable war's necropolitical calculus of who should live and who can, or must, die (MacLeish 2013, Mbembe 2003). War also involves vexed, stunted, and deadly forms of communication with perceived enemies or civilian populations. And those who are victims of military deeds, including civilians and sometimes service members themselves, are often left with psychic wounds that they cannot talk their way out of, for such wounds resist semantic expression and may emerge through more complex semiotic forms.

Keyword(s): discourse, language, military, necropolitics, violence, war
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110258
2021-10-21
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/50/1/annurev-anthro-101819-110258.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110258&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Achugar M. 2008. What We Remember: The Construction of Memory in Military Discourse Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  2. Agelopoulos G. 2000.. ‘ You are in the Army now’: an ethnographic account of military training Paper presented at the 6th Biennial EASA Conference, Krakow, July 26–29
  3. Argenti-Pillen A. 2003. Masking Terror: How Women Contain Violence in Southern Sri Lanka Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  4. Asad T. 2007. On Suicide Bombing New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  5. Atijondro G 2000. Ninjas, Nanggalas, monuments, and Mossad manuals: an anthropology of Indonesian state terror in East Timor. Death Squad: The Anthropology of State Terror JA Sluka 158–88 Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Axelrod A. 2013. Whiskey Tango Foxtrot: The Real Language of the Modern American Military New York: Skyhorse
  7. Baker M. 2010. Narratives of terrorism and security: ‘accurate’ translations, suspicious frames. Crit. Stud. Terror. 3:3347–64
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bartov O. 1998. Defining enemies, making victims: Germans, Jews, and the Holocaust. Am. Hist. Rev. 103:3771–816
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Belkin A. 2012. Bring Me Men: Military Masculinity and the Benign Façade of American Empire, 1898–2001 New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  10. Benjamin M. 2013. Drone Warfare: Killing by Remote Control London: Verso
  11. Benke G, Wodak R. 2003. Remembering and forgetting: the discursive construction of generational memories. See Dedaić & Nelson 2003 215–43
  12. Bhan M. 2018.. “ In search of the Aryan seed”: race, religion, and sexuality in Indian-occupied Kashmir. See Duschinski et al. 2018 74–101
  13. Billig M. 2003. Preface: language as forms of death. See Dedaić & Nelson 2003 vii–xvii
  14. Blasko DJ. 2019. The Chinese military speaks to itself, revealing doubts. War on the Rocks Feb. 18. https://warontherocks.com/2019/02/the-chinese-military-speaks-to-itself-revealing-doubts/
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bucholtz M, Hall K. 2005. Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Stud 7:4–5585–614
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Bucholtz M, Hall K 2016. Embodied sociolinguistics. Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates N Coupland 173–97 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Bulmer S, Jackson D 2016.. “ You do not live in my skin”: embodiment, voice, and the veteran. Crit. Mil. Stud. 2:1–225–40
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Burns RA. 2003. This is my rifle, this is my gun…: gunlore in the military. New Dir. Folk. 2003. 7: https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ndif/article/view/19886/25956
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Caruth C. 1996. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  20. Cohn C. 1987. Sex and death in the rational world of defense intellectuals. Signs 12:4687–718
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Cohn C. 2020.. “ Cocked and loaded”: Trump and the gendered discourse of national security. See McIntosh & Mendoza-Denton 2020 179–90
  22. Cotter WM. 2017. Gaza at the margins? Legibility and indeterminacy in the Israel-Palestine conflict. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 27:154–70
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Daniel EV. 1996. Charred Lullabies: Chapters in an Anthropology of Violence Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  24. Das V 2004. The signature of the state: the paradox of illegibility. Anthropology in the Margins of the State V Das, D Poole 225–52 Santa Fe, NM: Sch. Adv. Res. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Das V. 2007. Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary Berkeley CA: Univ. Calif. Press
  26. Das V, Nandy A. 1985. Violence, victimhood and the language of silence. Contrib. Indian Sociol. 19:1177–95
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Dawes J. 2002. The Language of War: Literature and Culture in the U.S. from the Civil War through World War II Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  28. Dedaić MN, Nelson DN 2003. At War with Words New York: Mouton de Gruyter
  29. Disler EA. 2008. Language and Gender in the Military: Honorifics, Narrative, and Ideology in Air Force Talk Amherst, NY: Cambria Press
  30. Dunmire PL. 2011. Projecting the Future through Political Discourse: The Case of the Bush Doctrine Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  31. Duranti A, Ochs E, Schieffelin BB 2012. The Handbook of Language Socialization Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell
  32. Duschinski H, Bhan M, Zia A, Mahmood C 2018. Resisting Occupation in Kashmir Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  33. Dworsky M. 2019. Soldier-speak: military language as a temporal dialect in Israel Paper presented at Semiotic Sensitivities, 1st Annual MIT Colloquium on Linguistic Anthropology Cambridge, MA: April 17
  34. Eastman C. 2009. Fight like a man: gender and rhetoric in the early nineteenth-century American peace movement. Am. Ninet. Century Hist. 10:3247–71
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Edwards DB. 2017. Caravan of Martyrs: Sacrifice and Suicide Bombing in Afghanistan Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  36. Eichler M. 2012. Militarizing Men: Gender, Conscription, and War in Post-Soviet Russia Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  37. Enloe C. 2000. Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women's Lives Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  38. Fassin D. 2008. The humanitarian politics of testimony: subjectification through trauma in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Cult. Anthropol. 23:3531–58
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Fassin D, Rechtman R. 2009. The Empire of Trauma: An Inquiry into the Condition of Victimhood Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  40. Faudree P. 2012. How to say things with wars: performativity and discursive rupture in the Requerimiento of the Spanish conquest. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 22:3182–200
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Faust DG. 2008. This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War New York: Knopf
  42. Finley EP. 2011. Fields of Combat: Understanding PTSD Among Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  43. Footitt H, Kelly M 2012a. Languages and the Military: Alliances, Occupation, and Peace Building Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
  44. Footitt H, Kelly M 2012b. Languages at War: Policies and Practices of Language Contacts in Conflict Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
  45. Fox M. 2014. Chester Nez, 93, dies; Navajo words washed from mouth helped win war. New York Times June 6. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/06/us/chester-nez-dies-at-93-his-native-tongue-helped-to-win-a-war-of-words.html
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Frank DA, Slovic P, Vastfjall D. 2011.. “ Statistics don't bleed”: rhetorical psychology, presence, and psychic numbing in genocide psychology. JAC 31:3–4609–24
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Fukurai H, Yang A 2018. The history of Japanese racism, Japanese American redress, and the dangers associated with government regulation of hate speech. Hastings Const. Law Q. 45:3533–76
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Fussell P. 2013. 1975. The Great War and Modern Memory Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  49. Gilbert A. 2018. A Shadow on Our Hearts: Soldier-Poetry, Morality, and the American War in Vietnam Amherst: Univ. Mass. Press
  50. Goffman E. 1981. Forms of Talk Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  51. Gusterson H. 1996. Nuclear Rites: A Weapons Laboratory at the End of the Cold War Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  52. Gutmann M, Lutz C. 2010. Breaking Ranks: Iraq Veterans Speak Out Against the War Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  53. Halbe D. 2011. Language in the military workplace—between hierarchy and politeness. Text Talk 31:315–34
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Han C. 2004. The work of indebtedness: the traumatic present of late capitalist Chile. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 28:2169–87
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Helmreich S 2015. Transduction. Keywords in Sound D Novak, M Sakakeeny 222–31 Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Hicks Kennard C 2000. Redefining femininity: female drill instructors in the United States Marine Corps. Texas Linguist. Forum 43:87–98
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Hodges A. 2011. The “War on Terror” Narrative: Discourse and Intertextuality in the Construction and Contestation of Sociopolitical Reality Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  58. Hodges A 2013. The generic US presidential war narrative: justifying military force and imagining the nation. Discourses of War and Peace A Hodges 47–68 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Hodges H, Nilep C 2007. Discourse, War and Terrorism Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  60. Hoffman D. 2011. The War Machines: Young Men and Violence in Sierra Leone and Liberia Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  61. Holland J. 2012. Selling the War on Terror: Foreign Policy Discourses after 9/11 Abingdon, UK: Routledge
  62. Huérou AL, Regamey A 2008. Russia's war in Chechnya: the discourse of counterterrorism and the legitimation of violence. Democracies at War against Terrorism: A Comparative Perspective S Cohen 211–32 New York: Palgrave Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Inghilleri M, Harding S-A. 2010. Translating violent conflict. Translator 16:2165–73
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Jackson R. 2005. Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics, and Counter-Terrorism Manchester, UK: Manchester Univ. Press
  65. Kaag J, Kreps S. 2014. Drone Warfare Malden, MA: Polity
  66. Kaplan D. 2005. Public intimacy: dynamics of seduction in male homosocial interactions. Symb. Interact. 28:4571–95
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Kertzer DI. 1988. Ritual, Politics, and Power New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  68. Kiesling SF 1997. Power and the language of men. Language and Masculinity S Johnson, UH Meinhof 65–85 Oxford, UK: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Kiesling SF. 2001.. “ Now I gotta watch what I say”: shifting constructions of masculinity in discourse. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 11:2250–73
     [Google Scholar]
  70. King A. 2006. The word of command: communication and cohesion in the military. Armed Forces Soc 32:493–512
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Kirtley J. 2011. Speech in the U.S. military: a sociophonetic approach to identity and meaning MA Thesis Linguist., Univ. Hawai‘i, Manoa:
  72. Lanigan RL 2011. Familiar frustration: the Japanese encounter with Navajo (Diné) “code talkers” in World War II. Languages in Contact 2011 Z Wąsik, PP Chruszczewski 47–69 Wrocław, Pol: Philol. Higher Educ.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Lawson R. 2020. Language and masculinities: history, development, and future. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 6:409–34
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Lemons K. 2007. Discourses of freedom: gender and religion in US media coverage of the war on Iraq. See Hodges & Nilep 2007 89–103
  75. Levy E 2012. Upper echelons and boots on the ground: the case for diglossia in the military. Warrior Ways: Explorations in Modern Military Folklore EA Eliason, T Tujela 99–115 Boulder: Univ. Press Colo.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Lutz C. 2001. Homefront: A Military City and the American Twentieth Century Boston: Beacon Press
  77. Lutz C. 2002. Making war at home in the United States: militarization and the current crisis. Am. Anthropol. 104:3723–35
     [Google Scholar]
  78. MacLeish KT. 2013. Making War at Fort Hood: Life and Uncertainty in a Military Community Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Malkki LH. 1996. Speechless emissaries: refugees, humanitarianism, and dehistoricization. Cult. Anthropol. 11:3377–404
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Marcellino WM. 2013. Talk like a Marine: USMC linguistic acculturation and civil-military argument. Discourse Stud 16:3385–405
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Marvin C, Ingle DW. 1999. Blood Sacrifice and the Nation: Totem Rituals and the American Flag Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  82. Masco J. 2014. The Theater of Operations: National Security Affect from the Cold War to the War on Terror Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  83. Mbembe A. 2003. Necropolitics. Public Cult 15:111–40
     [Google Scholar]
  84. McIntosh J. 2009. The Edge of Islam: Power, Personhood, and Ethnoreligious Boundaries on the Kenya Coast Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  85. McIntosh J. 2020a. Crybabies and snowflakes. See McIntosh & Mendoza-Denton 2020 74–88
  86. McIntosh J. 2020b. Introduction: the Trump era as a linguistic emergency. See McIntosh & Mendoza-Denton 2020 1–44
  87. McIntosh J. 2020c. Maledictive language: obscenity and taboo words. The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology J Stanlaw 1–9 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0248
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  88. McIntosh J. 2021.. “ Because it's easier to kill that way”: dehumanizing epithets, militarized subjectivity, and American necropolitics. Lang. Soc 50:4 https://doi.org/10.1017=S0047404521000324. In press
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  89. McIntosh J, Mendoza-Denton N 2020. Language in the Trump Era: Scandals and Emergencies Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  90. McSorley K 2013. Rethinking war and the body. War and the Body: Militarisation, Practice and Experience K McSorley 233–44 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Mikhailin V 2006. Russian Army Mat as a code system controlling behaviors in the Russian Army. Dedovshchina in the Post-Soviet Military: Hazing of Russian Army Conscripts in a Comparative Perspective F Daucé, E Sieca-Kozlowski 121–43 Leipzig, Ger: Deutsche Bibl.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Moon S. 2005. Trouble with conscription: entertaining soldiers, popular culture, and the politics of militarized masculinity in South Korea. Men Masc 8:164–92
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Mutonya M, Parsons TH. 2004. KiKAR: a Swahili variety in Kenya's colonial army. J. Afr. Lang. Linguist. 25:111–25
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Nordstrom C. 1997. A Different Kind of War Story Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  95. O'Brien T 1998. How to tell a true war story. Postmodern American Fiction: A Norton Anthology P Geyh, FG Leebron, A Levy 174–83 New York: Norton
     [Google Scholar]
  96. O'Connor PE. 1995. Discourse of violence. Discourse Soc 6:3309–18
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Peterson MA. 2003. American warriors speaking American: the metapragmatics of performance in the nation-state. See Dedaić & Nelson 2003 421–48
  98. Pieslak J. 2009. Sound Targets: American Soldiers and Music in the Iraq War Bloomington, IN: Indiana Univ. Press
  99. Pillen A. 2016. Language, translation, trauma. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 45:95–111
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Potter TM. 2007. USMA nicknames: naming by the rules. Names 55:445–54
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Rafael VL. 2016. Motherless Tongues: The Insurgency of Language amid Wars of Translation Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  102. Reinberg L. 1991. In the Field: The Language of the Vietnam War New York: Facts on File
  103. Riseman NJ. 2007.. ‘ Regardless of history’?: Re-assessing the Navajo Codetalkers of World War II. Australas. J. Am. Stud 26:248–73
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Robben ACGM. 2018. Argentina Betrayed: Memory, Mourning, and Accountability Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  105. Saber A. 2018. Lexicogenic matrices and institutional roles of U.S. military jargon. Lexis 11: http://journals.openedition.org/lexis/1179
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Scarry E. 1988. The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  107. Scheper-Hughes N, Bourgois P 2004. Introduction: making sense of violence. Violence in War and Peace: An Anthology N Scheper-Hughes, P Bourgois 1–32 Oxford, UK: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Schrader B. 2019. Fight to Live, Live to Fight: Veteran Activism after War Albany: SUNY Press
  109. Shay J. 2010. Achilles in Vietnam: Combat Trauma and the Undoing of Character New York: Simon and Schuster
  110. Sherman N. 2015. Afterwar: Healing the Moral Wounds of Our Soldiers Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  111. Shohet M. 2021. Silence and Sacrifice: Family Stories of Care and the Limits of Love in Vietnam Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  112. Silberstein S. 2002. War of Words: Language, Politics and 9/11 New York: Routledge
  113. Strand S, Berndtsson J. 2015. Recruiting the “enterprising soldier”: military recruitment discourses in Sweden and the United Kingdom. Crit. Mil. Stud. 1:1233–48
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Suárez-Orozco MM. 1990. Speaking of the unspeakable: toward a psychosocial understanding of responses to terror. Ethos 18:3353–83
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Thiesmeyer L. 1995. The discourse of official violence: anti-Japanese North American discourse and the American internment camps. Discourse Soc 6:3319–52
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Tirrell L 2012. Genocidal language games. Speech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech I Maitra, MK McGowan 174–221 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Tucker RE, Prosise TO. 2003. The language of atomic science and atomic conflict: exploring the limits of symbolic representation. See Dedaić & Nelson 2003 127–48
  118. Turner V. 1967. Betwixt and between: the liminal period in rites de passage. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual93–111 Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Van Gennep A. 2004. 1909. The Rites of Passage London: Routledge:
  120. Varma A. 2018. From “terrorist” to “terrorized”: how trauma became the language of suffering in Kashmir. See Duschinski et al. 2018 129–52
  121. Verrips J 2004. Dehumanization as a double-edged sword: from boot camp animals to killing machines. Grammars of Identity/Alterity: A Structural Approach G Baumann, A Gingrich 142–57 Oxford, UK: Berghahn Books
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Volcic Z, Erjavec K. 2007. Discourse of war and terrorism in Serbia: “We were fighting the terrorists already in Bosnia.…. ” See Hodges & Nilep 2007 185–204
  123. Wool Z. 2015. After War: The Weight of Life at Walter Reed Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  124. Yong KH. 2006. Silences in history and nation-state: reluctant accounts of the Cold War in Sarawak. Am. Ethnol. 33:462–73
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Young IM. 2003. The logic of masculinist protection: reflections on the current security state. Signs 29:11–25
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110258
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error