1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Anthropology
  4. Volume 46, 2018
  5. Article

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volume 46, 2018

Collective Action Theory and the Dynamics of Complex Societies

Abstract

Collective action theory, as formulated in the social sciences, posits rational social actors who regularly assess the actions of others to inform their own decisions to cooperate. In anthropological archaeology, collective action theory is now being used to investigate the dynamics of large-scale polities of the past. Building on the work of Margaret Levi, collective action theorists argue that the more principals (rulers) depended on the populace for labor, tribute, or other revenues, the greater the agency (or “voice”) a population had in negotiating public benefits. In this review, we evaluate collective action theory, situating it in relation to existing theoretical approaches that address cooperation, consensus building, and nonelite agency in the past. We draw specific attention to the importance of analyzing agency at multiple scales as well as how institutions articulate shared interests and order sociopolitical and economic interaction. Finally, we argue for a new synthesis of political economy approaches with collective action theory.

Keyword(s): anthropological archaeology, collective action theory, cooperation, institutions, political economy, power relations
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041409
2017-10-23
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/46/1/annurev-anthro-102116-041409.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041409&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adler MA, Wilshusen RH. 1990. Large-scale integrative facilities in tribal societies: cross-cultural and southwestern US examples. World Archaeol 22:133–46 [Google Scholar]
  2. Angelbeck B, Grier C. 2012. Anarchism and the archaeology of anarchic societies: resistance to centralization in the Coast Salish region of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Curr. Anthropol. 53:547–87 [Google Scholar]
  3. Artursson M, Earle T, Brown J. 2016. The construction of monumental landscapes in low-density societies: new evidence from the Early Neolithic of southern Scandinavia (4000–3300 BC) in comparative perspective. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 41:1–18 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bettencourt L. 2013. The origins of scaling in cities. Science 340:1438–41 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blanton RE. 2010. Collective action and adaptive socioecological cycles in premodern states. Cross-Cult. Res. 44:41–59 [Google Scholar]
  6. Blanton RE. 2011. Cultural transformation, art, and collective action in polity-building. Cross-Cult. Res. 45:106–27 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blanton RE. 2013. Cooperation and the moral economy of the marketplace. Merchants, Markets, and Exchange in the Pre-Columbian World KG Hirth, J Pillsbury 23–48 Washington, DC:: Dumbarton Oaks [Google Scholar]
  8. Blanton RE, Fargher LF. 2016. How Humans Cooperate: Confronting the Challenges of Collective Action Boulder: Univ. Press Colo.
  9. Blanton RE, Fargher LF. 2008. Collective Action in the Formation of Pre-Modern States New York: Springer
  10. Blanton RE, Fargher LF. 2009. Collective action in the evolution of pre-modern states. Soc. Evol. Hist. 8:133–66 [Google Scholar]
  11. Blanton RE, Fargher LF. 2010. Evaluating causal factors in market development in premodern states: a comparative study, with critical comments on the history of ideas about markets. Archaeological Approaches to Market Exchange in Ancient Societies CP Garraty, BL Stark 207–26 Boulder: Univ. Colo. Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Blanton RE, Fargher LF. 2011. The collective logic of pre-modern cities. World Archaeol 43:505–22 [Google Scholar]
  13. Blanton RE, Fargher LF. 2012. Neighborhoods and the civic constitutions of premodern cities as seen from the perspective of collective action. The Neighborhood as a Social and Spatial Unit in Mesoamerican Cities MC Arnauld, LR Manzanilla, ME Smith 27–52 Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press [Google Scholar]
  14. Blanton RE, Fargher LF. 2013. Reconsidering Darwinian anthropology: with suggestions for a revised agenda for cooperation research. See Carballo 2013 93–128
  15. Blanton RE, Feinman GM, Kowalewski SA, Peregrine PN. 1996. A dual-processual theory for the evolution of Mesoamerican civilization. Curr. Anthropol. 37:1–14 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bowles S, Gintis H. 2011. A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  17. Brumfiel EM. 1992. Breaking and entering the ecosystem: gender, class, and faction steal the show. Am. Anthropol. 94:551–67 [Google Scholar]
  18. Brumfiel EM. 1995. Heterarchy and the analysis of complex societies: comments. See Ehrenreich et al. 1995 125–31
  19. Brumfiel EM. 1996. Figurines and the Aztec state: testing the effectiveness of ideological domination. Gender and Archaeology RP Wright 143–66 Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press [Google Scholar]
  20. Brumfiel EM. 1998. Huitzilopochtli's conquest: Aztec ideology in the archaeological record. Camb. Archaeol. J. 8:3–13 [Google Scholar]
  21. Brumfiel EM, Earle TK. 1987. Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  22. Brumfiel EM, Fox JW. 1994. Factional Competition and Political Development in the New World Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  23. Canuto M-A, Yaeger J. 2000. The Archaeology of Communities: A New World Perspective London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  24. Carballo DM. 2013. Cooperation and Collective Action: Archaeological Perspectives Boulder: Univ. Press Colo.
  25. Carballo DM, Roscoe P, Feinman GM. 2014. Cooperation and collective action in the cultural evolution of complex societies. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 21:98–133 [Google Scholar]
  26. Carneiro RL. 1970. A theory of the origin of the state. Science 169:733–38 [Google Scholar]
  27. Carruthers P. 2006. The Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press
  28. Childe VG. 1936. Man Makes Himself London: Watts
  29. Childe VG. 1946. What Happened in History? New York: Penguin
  30. Clastres P. 1989. Society Against the State: Essays in Political Anthropology Cambridge, MA: Zone Books
  31. Codere H. 1961. Kwakiutl. Perspectives in American Indian Culture Change EH Spicer 431–516 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  32. Creese JL. 2016. Emotion work and archaeology of consensus: the Northern Iroquoian case. World Archeol 48:14–34 [Google Scholar]
  33. Crumley CL. 1995. Heterarchy and the analysis of complex societies. See Ehrenreich et al. 1995 1–5
  34. D'Altroy TN, Earle TK. 1985. Staple finance, wealth finance and storage in the Inca political economy. Curr. Anthropol. 26:187–206 [Google Scholar]
  35. D'Altroy TN, Hastorf CA. 2001. Empire and Domestic Economy New York: Plenum Press
  36. Dawkins R. 1976. The Selfish Gene Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  37. DeMarrais E. 2011. Figuring the group. Camb. Archaeol. J. 21:165–86 [Google Scholar]
  38. DeMarrais E. 2013a. Art as an affecting presence: infant funerary urns in northwest Argentina. World Art 3:101–19 [Google Scholar]
  39. DeMarrais E. 2013b. Understanding heterarchy: crafting and social projects in pre-Hispanic Northwest Argentina. Camb. Archaeol. J. 23:345–62 [Google Scholar]
  40. DeMarrais E. 2016. Making pacts and cooperative acts: the archaeology of coalition and consensus. World Archaeol 48:1–13 [Google Scholar]
  41. DeMarrais E. 2017. Ancestors, animacy, and archives: dynamics of heterarchy in pre-Hispanic Northwest Argentina. Powerful Places in the Ancient Andes J Jennings, E Swenson Albuquerque: Univ. N. M. Press [Google Scholar]
  42. DeMarrais E, Castillo LJ, Earle T. 1996. Ideology, materialization, and power strategies. Curr. Anthropol. 37:15–31 [Google Scholar]
  43. Dobres M-A, Robb J. 2000. Agency in Archaeology London: Routledge
  44. Drennan RD, Peterson CE, Fox JR. 2012. Degrees and kinds of inequality. See Price & Feinman 2012a 45–76
  45. Dunbar R. 1993. Co-evolution of neocortex size, group size, and language in humans. Behav. Brain Sci. 16:681–735 [Google Scholar]
  46. Durkheim E. 1984 (1893). The Division of Labor New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  47. Earle T. 1978. Economic and Social Organization of a Complex Chiefdom: The Halelea District, Kaua'i, Hawaii Anthropol. Pap. 63 Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich., Mus. Anthropol. [Google Scholar]
  48. Earle T. 1997. How Chiefs Come to Power: The Political Economy in Prehistory Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  49. Earle T. 2016. Pathways to power: corporate and network strategies, staple and wealth finance, and primary and secondary states. See Fargher & Heredia Espinoza 2016 291–308
  50. Earle T, Spriggs M. 2015. Political economy in prehistory: a Marxist approach to Pacific sequences. Curr. Anthropol. 56:515–44 [Google Scholar]
  51. Ehrenreich RM, Crumley CL, Levy JE. 1995. Special Issue: Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies. Archaeol. Pap. Am. Anthropol. Assoc. 6:1) [Google Scholar]
  52. Fargher LF. 2016. Corporate power strategies, collective action, and control of principals: a cross-cultural perspective. See Fargher & Heredia Espinoza 2016 309–26
  53. Fargher LF, Blanton RE. 2007. Revenue, voice, and public goods in three pre-modern states. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 49:848–82 [Google Scholar]
  54. Fargher LF, Blanton RE. 2012. Segmentación y acción colectiva: un acercamiento cultural-comparativo sobre la voz y el poder compartio en los estados premodernos. El Poder Compartido: Ensayos sobre la Arqueologia de Organizaciones Politicas Segmentaria y Oligarquicas A Daniels, G Gutiérrez Mendoza 205–36 Tlalpan, Mex.: Cent. Investig. Estud. Super. Antropol. Soc. [Google Scholar]
  55. Fargher LF, Blanton RE, Heredia Espinoza VY. 2010. Egalitarian ideology and political power in Prehispanic Central Mexico: the case of Tlaxcallan. Lat. Am. Antiq. 21:227–51 [Google Scholar]
  56. Fargher LF, Blanton RE, Heredia Espinoza VY, Millhauser J, Xiuhtecutli N, Overholtzer L. 2011a. Tlaxcallan: the archaeology of an ancient republic in the New World. Antiquity 85:172–86 [Google Scholar]
  57. Fargher LF, Heredia Espinoza VY. 2016. Alternative Pathways to Complexity: A Collection of Essays on Architecture, Economics, Power, and Cross-Cultural Analysis in Honor of Richard E. Blanton Boulder: Univ. Press Colo.
  58. Fargher LF, Heredia Espinosa VY, Blanton RE. 2011b. Alternative pathways to power in late Postclassic Highland Mesoamerica. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 30:306–26 [Google Scholar]
  59. Feinman GM. 2015. Comment on “Political Economy in Prehistory: A Marxist Approach to Pacific Sequences” (Timothy Earle and Matthew Spriggs, 2015). Curr. Anthropol. 56:530 [Google Scholar]
  60. Feinman GM, Nicholas LM. 2016. Framing the rise and variability of past complex societies. See Fargher & Heredia Espinoza 2016 271–89
  61. Fried MH. 1967. The Evolution of Political Society New York: Random House
  62. Gilman A. 1981. The development of social stratification in Bronze Age Europe. Curr. Anthropol. 22:1–24 [Google Scholar]
  63. Gintis H, Bowles S, Boyd R, Fehr E. 2005. Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  64. Gintis H, Smith EA, Bowles S. 2001. Costly signaling and cooperation. J. Theor. Biol. 213:103–19 [Google Scholar]
  65. Graeber D. 2004. Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology Chicago: Prickly Paradigm
  66. Haas J. 1982. The Evolution of the Prehistoric State New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  67. Hall M, Silliman SW. 2006. Historical Archaeology Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  68. Hardin R. 1982. Collective Action: Resources for the Future Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  69. Hardin R. 1991. Acting together, contributing together. Ration. Soc. 3:365–80 [Google Scholar]
  70. Harris M. 1999. Theories of Culture in Postmodern Times Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press
  71. Hayden B. 1995. Pathways to power: principles for creating socioeconomic inequalities. Foundations of Social Inequality TD Price, GM Feinman 15–86 New York: Plenum Press [Google Scholar]
  72. Hayden B. 2014. The Power of Feasts: From Prehistory to the Present Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  73. Hayden B, Villeneuve S. 2013. The power of secret societies in the past Presented at Annu. Meet. Soc. Am. Archaeol., 78th Honolulu:
  74. Hechter M. 1983. A theory of group solidarity. The Microfoundations of Macrosociology M Hechter 16–57 Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  75. Hechter M. 1987. Principles of Group Solidarity Calif. Ser. Soc. Choice Polit. Econ Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  76. Hechter M. 1990a. The emergence of cooperative social institutions. Social Institutions: Their Emergence, Maintenance and Effects M Hechter, K-D Opp, R Wippler 13–33 New York: Aldine de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  77. Hechter M. 1990b. On the inadequacy of game theory for the solution of real-world collective action problems. The Limits of Rationality K Schweers Cook, M Levi 240–49 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  78. Henry ER, Barrier CR. 2016. The organization of dissonance in Adena-Hopewell societies of eastern North America. World Archaeol 48:87–109 [Google Scholar]
  79. Heredia Espinoza VY. 2016. Complexity without centralization: corporate power in Postclassic Jalisco. See Fargher & Heredia Espinoza 2016 79–103
  80. Hodgson GM. 2000. What is the essence of institutional economics. ? J. Econ. Issues 34:317–29 [Google Scholar]
  81. Janusek JW, Kolata AL. 2004. Top-down or bottom-up: rural settlement and raised field agriculture in the Lake Titicaca Basin, Bolivia. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 23:404–30 [Google Scholar]
  82. Jennings J, Earle TK. 2016. Urbanization, state formation, and cooperation: a reappraisal. Curr. Anthropol. 57:474–93 [Google Scholar]
  83. Johnson AW, Earle T. 2000. The evolution of human societies. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  84. Johnson GA. 1982. Organizational structure and scalar stress. Theory and Explanation in Archaeology C Renfrew 389–421 New York: Academic Press [Google Scholar]
  85. Kantner J, Vaughn KJ. 2012. Pilgrimage as costly signal: religiously motivated cooperation in Chaco and Nasca. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 31:66–82 [Google Scholar]
  86. Kienlin TL, Zimmermann A. 2012. Beyond Elites: Alternatives to Hierarchical Systems in Modelling Social Formations Bonn: Verlag Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH
  87. Kohler TA, Reese KM. 2014. Long and spatially variable Neolithic demographic transition in the North American Southwest. PNAS 111:10101–6 [Google Scholar]
  88. Kohler TA, Varien MD. 2012. Emergence and Collapse of Early Villages: Models of Central Mesa Verde Archaeology Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  89. Kristiansen K. 1991. Chiefdoms, states, and systems of social evolution. Chiefdoms: Power, Economy, and Ideology TK Earle 16–43 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  90. Ladefoged TN, Kirch PV, Gon SM III, Chadwick OA, Hartshorn AS, Vitousek PM. 2009. Opportunities and constraints for intensive agriculture in the Hawaiian archipelago prior to European contact. J. Archaeol. Sci. 36:2374–83 [Google Scholar]
  91. Leone MP, Potter PB Jr.. 1988. The Recovery of Meaning: Historical Archaeology in the Eastern United States Washington, DC: Smithson. Inst. Press
  92. Leone MP, Potter PB Jr.. 1999. Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism New York: Plenum Press
  93. Levi M. 1981. The predatory theory of rule. Polit. Soc. 10:431–66 [Google Scholar]
  94. Levi M. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue Berkeley/London: Univ. Calif. Press
  95. Levi M. 1997. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism: Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  96. Levi M. 2002. The state of the study of the state. Political Science: The State of the Discipline I Katznelson, HV Milner 33–55 New York: Norton [Google Scholar]
  97. Lichbach MI. 1994a. The Rebel's Dilemma Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  98. Lichbach M. 1994b. What makes rational peasants revolutionary? Dilemma, paradox, and irony in peasant collective action. World Polit 46:383–418 [Google Scholar]
  99. Lichbach MI. 1996. The Cooperator's Dilemma Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  100. Malinowski B. 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
  101. Mann M. 1986. The Sources of Social Power 1 A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  102. McGuire RH, Paynter R. 1991. The Archaeology of Inequality Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  103. McGuire RH, Saitta DJ. 1996. Although they have petty captains, they obey them badly: the dialectics of Prehispanic Western Pueblo Social Organization. Am. Antiq. 61:197–216 [Google Scholar]
  104. Mead M. 1937. Cooperation and Competition Among Primitive Peoples New York: McGraw Hill
  105. Oka RC. 2016. Trade, traders, and trading systems: macro-modeling of trade, commerce, and civilization. Trade and Civilization K Kristiansen, T Lindkvist, J Myrdal 327–73 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  106. Oka RC, Kusimba CM. 2008. The archaeology of trading systems. Part 1: Towards a new trade synthesis. J. Archaeol. Res. 16:339–95 [Google Scholar]
  107. Oka RC, Kusimba CM, Gogle VD. 2009. Where others fear to trade: modeling adaptive resilience in ethnic trading networks to famines, maritime warfare and imperial stability in the growing Indian Ocean economy, ca. 1500–1700 CE. Political Economy of Hazards and Disasters EC Jones, AD Murphy 201–32 Walnut Grove, CA: AltaMira Press [Google Scholar]
  108. Olson M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  109. Ortman SG, Coffey GD. 2015. Universal Scaling: Evidence from Village-Level Societies SFI Work. Pap. 15-10-044 Santa Fe Inst. Santa Fe, NM: http://www.santafe.edu/media/workingpapers/15-11-044.pdf
  110. Ostrom E. 1986. An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice 48:3–25 [Google Scholar]
  111. Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  112. Ostrom E. 1998. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 92:1–22 [Google Scholar]
  113. Ostrom E. 2009. Collective action theory. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics C Boix, SC Stokes 186–208 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  114. Ostrom E, Basurto X. 2011. Crafting analytical tools to study institutional change. J. Inst. Econ. 7:317–43 [Google Scholar]
  115. Overholtzer L, Robin C. 2015. The materiality of everyday life: an introduction. Archeol. Pap. Am. Anthropol. Assoc. 26:1–9 [Google Scholar]
  116. Pennisi E. 2005. How did cooperative behaviors evolve?. Science 309:93 [Google Scholar]
  117. Peregrine PN, Ember CR. 2016. Network strategy and war. See Fargher & Heredia Espinoza 2016 259–69
  118. Pluckhahn TJ. 2013. Cooperation and competition among Late Woodland households at Kolomoki, Georgia. See Carballo 2013 175–96
  119. Price TD, Feinman GM. 2012a. Pathways to Power: New Perspectives on the Emergence of Social Inequality New York: Springer
  120. Price TD, Feinman GM. 2012b. Social inequality and the evolution of human social organization. See Price & Feinman 2012a 1–14
  121. Radcliffe-Brown AR. 1931. Social Organization of Australian Tribes Melbourne, Aust.: Macmillan
  122. Renfrew C. 1974. Beyond a subsistence economy: the evolution of social organization in prehistoric Europe. Reconstructing Complex Societies: An Archaeological Colloquium CB Moore 69–95 Cambridge, MA: Am. Sch. Orient. Res. [Google Scholar]
  123. Richerson PJ, Boyd R. 2005. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  124. Richerson PJ, Boyd RT, Henrich J. 2003. Cultural evolution of human cooperation. Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation P Hammerstein 357–88 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  125. Robin C. 2013. Everyday Life Matters: Maya Farmers at Chan Gainesville: Univ. Press Fla.
  126. Roscoe P. 2013. War, collective action, and the “evolution” of human polities. See Carballo 2013 57–82
  127. Saitta DJ. 1997. Power, labor, and the dynamics of change in Chacoan political economy. Am. Antiq. 62:7–26 [Google Scholar]
  128. Saitta DJ. 2007. The Archaeology of Collective Action Boulder: Univ. Colo. Press
  129. Saitta DJ. 2013. Agency and collective action: insights from North American historical archaeology. See Carballo 2013 129–48
  130. Scott JC. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  131. Service E. 1962. Primitive Social Organization New York: Random House
  132. Smith EA, Bliege Bird R. 2005. Costly signaling and cooperative behavior. See Gintis et al. 2005 115–48
  133. Smith ME. 2014. Peasant mobility, local migration, and premodern urbanization. World Archaeol 46:516–33 [Google Scholar]
  134. Smith ML. 2006. The archaeology of food preference. Am. Anthropol. 108:480–93 [Google Scholar]
  135. Smith ML. 2010. A Prehistory of Ordinary People Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press
  136. Spencer C. 2013. The competitive context of cooperation in pre-Hispanic Barinas, Venezuela: a multilevel-selection approach. See Carballo 2013 197–222
  137. Spriggs M. 1984. Marxist Perspectives in Archaeology Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  138. Stark BL. 2016. Central precinct plaza replication and corporate groups in Mesoamerica. See Fargher & Heredia Espinoza 2016 105–30
  139. Stark D. 2009. The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  140. Steward JH. 1955. Theory of Culture Change Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press
  141. Sussman RW, Cloninger RC. 2011. Origins of Altruism and Cooperation New York: Springer
  142. Tomasello M. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  143. Ware JA. 2014. A Pueblo Social History Santa Fe: SAR Press
  144. Willey GR, Sabloff JA. 1974. A History of American Archaeology San Francisco: Freeman
  145. Wittfogel K. 1957. Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041409
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error