1932

Abstract

Citation is a foundational dimension of human language and social life. Citational practices attribute utterances to distinct speakers, beings, or texts. They also connect temporalities, joining past, present, and future discourses, documents, and performance practices. In so doing, citational practices play a pivotal role in linking particular articulations of subjectivity to wider formations of cultural knowledge and authority. We explore how this linkage operates via production formats, participant structures, genre conventions, and ideologies of personhood. We then consider approaches to citation in the domain of legal discourse, an arena that relies on specific, patterned forms of citation that are historically rooted, institutionally perpetuated, and subjectively reenacted.

Keyword(s): genreinterdiscursivitylaw
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-025828
2014-10-21
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/43/1/annurev-anthro-102313-025828.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-025828&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Agha A. 1995. Process and personality. Semiotica 107:125–46 [Google Scholar]
  2. Agha A. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 15:38–59 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin MM. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays transl M Holquist. Austin: Univ. Tex. Press
  4. Bakhtin MM. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics transl. C Emerson Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  5. Bakhtin MM. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays transl. VW McGee Austin: Univ. Tex. Press
  6. Barber K. 1999. Quotation in the constitution of Yorùbá oral texts. Res. Afr. Lit. 30:17–41 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barber K. 2008. The Anthropology of Texts, Persons and Publics: Oral and Written Culture in Africa and Beyond New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  8. Bauman R. 1991. Contextualization, tradition and the dialogue of genres: Icelandic legends of the Kraftaskáld. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon C Goodwin, A Duranti 125–45 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  9. Bauman R. 2004. A World of Others' Words: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Intertextuality Malden, MA: Blackwell
  10. Bauman R. 2005. Indirect indexicality, identity, performance: dialogic observations. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 15:145–50 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bauman R, Briggs CL. 1990. Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 19:59–88 [Google Scholar]
  12. Benveniste É. 1971. Problems in General Linguistics transl. ME Meek Coral Gables, FL: Univ. Miami Press
  13. Bielo JS. 2009. Words upon the Word: An Ethnography of Evangelical Group Bible Study New York: N.Y. Univ. Press
  14. Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  15. Bourdieu P. 1990 (1980). The Logic of Practice Cambridge, UK: Polity
  16. Bourdieu P, Darbel A, Rivet JP, Seibel C. 1963. Travail et travailleurs en Algérie Paris: Mouton
  17. Bourdieu P, Sayad A. 1964. Le Déracinement: La crise de l'agriculture traditionnelle en Algérie Paris: Minuit
  18. Bowen JR. 1991. Sumatran Politics and Poetics: Gayo History, 1900–1989 New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  19. Briggs CL. 1988. Competence in Performance: The Creativity of Tradition in Mexicano Verbal Art Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  20. Briggs CL, Bauman R. 1992. Genre, intertextuality, and social power. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 2:131–72 [Google Scholar]
  21. Briggs CL, Bauman R. 2005. Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  22. Burns RP. 2009. The Death of the American Trial Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  23. Cole CM. 2010. Performing South Africa's Truth Commission: Stages of Transition Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana Univ. Press
  24. Conley JM, O'Barr WM. 1990. Rules versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  25. Conley JM, O'Barr WM. 2005. Just Words: Law, Language, and Power Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 2nd ed..
  26. Crapanzano V. 2000. Serving the Word: Literalism in America from the Pulpit to the Bench New York: New Press
  27. Dorsett S, McVeigh S. 2012. Jurisdiction New York: Routledge
  28. Eisenlohr P. 2010. Materialities of entextualization: the domestication of sound reproduction in Mauritian Muslim devotional practices. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 20:314–33 [Google Scholar]
  29. Finnegan R. 2011. Why Do We Quote?: The Culture and History of Quotation Cambridge, UK: Open Book
  30. Giordano C. 2008. Practices of translation and the making of migrant subjectivities in contemporary Italy. Am. Ethnol. 35:588–606 [Google Scholar]
  31. Goffman E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience Boston, MA: Northeast. Univ. Press
  32. Goffman E. 1979. Footing. Semiotica 25:1–21–29 [Google Scholar]
  33. Goffman E. 1981. Forms of Talk Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  34. Goodman JE. 2003. The proverbial Bourdieu: habitus and the politics of representation in the ethnography of Kabylia. Am. Anthropol. 105:782–93 [Google Scholar]
  35. Goodman JE. 2005. Berber Culture on the World Stage: From Village to Video Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
  36. Graham LR. 1995. Performing Dreams: Discourses of Immortality among the Xavante of Central Brazil Austin: Univ. Tex. Press
  37. Harding SF. 2000. The Book of Jerry Falwell: Fundamentalist Language and Politics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  38. Hastings A, Manning P. 2004. Introduction: acts of alterity. Lang. Commun. 24:291–311 [Google Scholar]
  39. Haviland JB. 1996. Projections, transpositions and relativity. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity J Gumperz, S Levinson 271–323 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  40. Haviland JB. 2005. “Whorish old man” and “one (animal) gentleman”: the intertextual construction of enemies and selves. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 15:81–94 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hill JH, Irvine JT. 1992. Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  42. Hill JH, Zepeda O. 1992. Mrs. Patricio's trouble: the distribution of responsibility in an account of personal experience. See Hill & Irvine 1992 197–225
  43. Hull M. 2012a. Documents and bureaucracy. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 41:251–67 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hull M. 2012b. Government of Paper. The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  45. Irvine JT. 1992. Insult and responsibility: verbal abuse in a Wolof village. See Hill & Irvine 1992 105–34
  46. Irvine JT. 1996. Shadow conversations: the indeterminacy of participant roles. See Silverstein & Urban 1996 131–59
  47. Kapchan D. 2005. Gender on the Market: Moroccan Women and the Revoicing of Tradition Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  48. Keane W. 1999. Voice. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 9:271–73 [Google Scholar]
  49. Keller E. 2005. The Road to Clarity: Seventh-day Adventism in Madagascar New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  50. Keller E. 2006. Scripture study as normal science: Seventh-day Adventist practice on the east coast of Madagascar. The Anthropology of Christianity F Cannell 273–94 Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  51. Kroskrity P. 1992. Arizona Tewa Kiva speech as a manifestation of linguistic ideology. Pragmatics 2:3297–309 [Google Scholar]
  52. Kroskrity P. 2009. Narrative reproductions: ideologies of storytelling, authoritative words, and generic regimentation in the village of Tewa. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 19:40–56 [Google Scholar]
  53. Latour B. 2010. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d'Etat transl. M Brilman, A Pottage Cambridge, UK: Polity
  54. Lee B. 1997. Talking Heads: Language, Metalanguage, and the Semiotics of Subjectivity Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  55. Levinson SC. 1988. Putting linguistics on a proper footing: explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation. Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order P Drew, A Wootton 161–227 Cambridge, UK: Polity [Google Scholar]
  56. Matoesian GM. 2001. Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trial New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  57. Mawani R. 2012. Law's Archive. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 8:337–65 [Google Scholar]
  58. Merry SE. 2006. Transnational human rights and local activism: mapping the middle. Am. Anthropol. 108:38–51 [Google Scholar]
  59. Mertz E. 1996. Recontextualization as socialization: texts and pragmatics in the law school classroom. See Silverstein & Urban 1996 229–49
  60. Mertz E. 2007. The Language of Law School: Learning to “Think Like a Lawyer.” New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  61. Mertz E, Weissbourd B. 1985. Legal ideology and linguistic theory: variability and its limits. Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives E Mertz, R Parmentier 261–85 New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  62. Nakassis CV. 2012. Brand, citationality, performativity. Am. Anthropol. 114:624–38 [Google Scholar]
  63. Ng KH. 2009. The Common Law in Two Voices: Language, Law, and the Postcolonial Dilemma in Hong Kong Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  64. Ochs E, Capps L. 2001. Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  65. Philips SU. 1982. The language socialization of lawyers: acquiring the ‘cant.’. Doing the Ethnography of Schooling: Educational Anthropology in Action GD Spindler 179–209 New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston [Google Scholar]
  66. Philips SU. 1983. The Invisible Culture: Communication in Classroom and Community on the Warm Springs Indian Reservation New York: Longman
  67. Raheja GG. 1996. Caste, colonialism, and the speech of the colonized: entextualization and disciplinary control in India. Am. Ethnol. 23:494–513 [Google Scholar]
  68. Richland JB. 2008. Arguing with Tradition: The Language of Law in Hopi Tribal Court Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  69. Richland JB. 2013. Jurisdiction: grounding law in language. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 42:209–26 [Google Scholar]
  70. Riles A. 2006. Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  71. Shoaps R. 2002. “Pray earnestly”: the textual construction of personal involvement in Pentecostal prayer and song. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 12:34–71 [Google Scholar]
  72. Shuman A. 1992. “Get outta my face”: entitlement and authoritative discourse. See Hill & Irvine 1992 135–60
  73. Silverstein M, Urban G. 1996. Natural Histories of Discourse Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  74. Tannen D. 2007. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  75. Taylor D. 2003. The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  76. Tomlinson M. 2010. Compelling replication: Genesis 1:26, John 3:16, and biblical politics in Fiji. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 16:743–60 [Google Scholar]
  77. Tomlinson M. 2011. The true me: individualism and biblical types in Fijian Methodism. Managing Modernity in the Western Pacific M Macintyre, M Patterson 147–71 St. Lucia, Aust: Univ. Qld. Press [Google Scholar]
  78. Urban G. 1989. The “I” of discourse. Semiotics, Self, and Society B Lee, G Urban 27–51 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  79. Vismann C. 2008. Files: Law and Media Technology transl. G Winthrop-Young Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  80. Voloshinov VN. 1973. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language transl. L Matejka, IR Titunik Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  81. Wilce J. 2005. Traditional laments and postmodern regrets: the circulation of discourse in metacultural context. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 15:60–71 [Google Scholar]
  82. Yankah K. 1995. Speaking for the Chief: Okyeame and the Politics of Akan Royal Oratory Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-025828
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error