Mechanical Control of Cell Differentiation: Insights from the Early Embryo

Literature Cited

1. 1.

   Chazaud C, Yamanaka Y. 2016. Lineage specification in the mouse preimplantation embryo. Development 143:1063–74
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2.

   Wu G, Scholer HR. 2016. Lineage segregation in the totipotent embryo. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 117:301–17
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3.

   Snippert HJ, Clevers H. 2011. Tracking adult stem cells. EMBO Rep 12:113–22
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4.

   Aydin B, Mazzoni EO. 2019. Cell reprogramming: the many roads to success. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 35:433–52
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5.

   Murry CE, Keller G. 2008. Differentiation of embryonic stem cells to clinically relevant populations: lessons from embryonic development. Cell 132:661–80
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6.

   Yamanaka S. 2012. Induced pluripotent stem cells: past, present, and future. Cell Stem Cell 10:678–84
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7.

   Smith AG, Heath JK, Donaldson DD, Wong GG, Moreau J et al. 1988. Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides. Nature 336:688–90
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8.

   Sato N, Meijer L, Skaltsounis L, Greengard P, Brivanlou AH. 2004. Maintenance of pluripotency in human and mouse embryonic stem cells through activation of Wnt signaling by a pharmacological GSK-3-specific inhibitor. Nat. Med. 10:55–63
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9.

   He S, Nakada D, Morrison SJ. 2009. Mechanisms of stem cell self-renewal. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 25:377–406
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10.

    Venkei ZG, Yamashita YM. 2018. Emerging mechanisms of asymmetric stem cell division. J. Cell Biol. 217:3785–95
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11.

    McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. 2004. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev. Cell 6:483–95
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12.

    Perestrelo T, Correia M, Ramalho-Santos J, Wirtz D 2018. Metabolic and mechanical cues regulating pluripotent stem cell fate. Trends Cell Biol 28:1014–29
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13.

    Chaudhuri O, Mooney DJ. 2012. Stem-cell differentiation: anchoring cell-fate cues. Nat. Mater. 11:568–69
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14.

    Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. 2006. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126:677–89
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15.

    Swift J, Ivanovska IL, Buxboim A, Harada T, Dingal PC et al. 2013. Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation. Science 341:1240104
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16.

    Smith LR, Irianto J, Xia Y, Pfeifer CR, Discher DE. 2019. Constricted migration modulates stem cell differentiation. Mol. Biol. Cell 30:1985–99
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17.

    Rossi G, Manfrin A, Lutolf MP. 2018. Progress and potential in organoid research. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19:671–87
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18.

    Schutgens F, Clevers H. 2020. Human organoids: tools for understanding biology and treating diseases. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 15:211–34
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19.

    Kim J, Koo BK, Knoblich JA. 2020. Human organoids: model systems for human biology and medicine. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21:571–84
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20.

    Sato T, Vries RG, Snippert HJ, van de Wetering M, Barker N et al. 2009. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 459:262–65
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21.

    Eiraku M, Watanabe K, Matsuo-Takasaki M, Kawada M, Yonemura S et al. 2008. Self-organized formation of polarized cortical tissues from ESCs and its active manipulation by extrinsic signals. Cell Stem Cell 3:519–32
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22.

    Hofer M, Lutolf MP. 2021. Engineering organoids. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6:402–20
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23.

    Clevers H. 2016. Modeling development and disease with organoids. Cell 165:1586–97
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24.

    Li M, Izpisua Belmonte JC 2019. Organoids—preclinical models of human disease. Reply. N. Engl. J. Med. 380:1982
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25.

    Renner M, Lancaster MA, Bian S, Choi H, Ku T et al. 2017. Self-organized developmental patterning and differentiation in cerebral organoids. EMBO J 36:1316–29
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26.

    Takebe T, Wells JM. 2019. Organoids by design. Science 364:956–59
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27.

    Sorrentino G, Rezakhani S, Yildiz E, Nuciforo S, Heim MH et al. 2020. Mechano-modulatory synthetic niches for liver organoid derivation. Nat. Commun. 11:3416
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28.

    Perez-Gonzalez C, Ceada G, Greco F, Matejcic M, Gomez-Gonzalez M et al. 2021. Mechanical compartmentalization of the intestinal organoid enables crypt folding and collective cell migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 23:745–57
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29.

    Hiiragi T, Solter D. 2004. First cleavage plane of the mouse egg is not predetermined but defined by the topology of the two apposing pronuclei. Nature 430:360–64
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30.

    Motosugi N, Dietrich JE, Polanski Z, Solter D, Hiiragi T. 2006. Space asymmetry directs preferential sperm entry in the absence of polarity in the mouse oocyte. PLOS Biol 4:e135
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31.

    Rossant J, Tam PP. 2004. Emerging asymmetry and embryonic patterning in early mouse development. Dev. Cell 7:155–64
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32.

    Johnson MH, Ziomek CA. 1983. Cell interactions influence the fate of mouse blastomeres undergoing the transition from the 16- to the 32-cell stage. Dev. Biol. 95:211–18
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33.

    Anani S, Bhat S, Honma-Yamanaka N, Krawchuk D, Yamanaka Y. 2014. Initiation of Hippo signaling is linked to polarity rather than to cell position in the pre-implantation mouse embryo. Development 141:2813–24
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34.

    Maitre JL, Turlier H, Illukkumbura R, Eismann B, Niwayama R et al. 2016. Asymmetric division of contractile domains couples cell positioning and fate specification. Nature 536:344–48
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35.

    Samarage CR, White MD, Alvarez YD, Fierro-Gonzalez JC, Henon Y et al. 2015. Cortical tension allocates the first inner cells of the mammalian embryo. Dev. Cell 34:435–47
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36.

    Korotkevich E, Niwayama R, Courtois A, Friese S, Berger N et al. 2017. The apical domain is required and sufficient for the first lineage segregation in the mouse embryo. Dev. Cell 40:235–47.e7
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37.

    Totaro A, Panciera T, Piccolo S. 2018. YAP/TAZ upstream signals and downstream responses. Nat. Cell Biol. 20:888–99
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38.

    Pocaterra A, Romani P, Dupont S. 2020. YAP/TAZ functions and their regulation at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 133:jcs230425
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39.

    Zhao B, Ye X, Yu J, Li L, Li W et al. 2008. TEAD mediates YAP-dependent gene induction and growth control. Genes Dev 22:1962–71
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40.

    Halder G, Dupont S, Piccolo S. 2012. Transduction of mechanical and cytoskeletal cues by YAP and TAZ. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13:591–600
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41.

    Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, Enzo E, Giulitti S et al. 2011. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 474:179–83
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42.

    Wada K, Itoga K, Okano T, Yonemura S, Sasaki H. 2011. Hippo pathway regulation by cell morphology and stress fibers. Development 138:3907–14
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43.

    Zhao B, Li L, Wang L, Wang CY, Yu J, Guan KL 2012. Cell detachment activates the Hippo pathway via cytoskeleton reorganization to induce anoikis. Genes Dev 26:54–68
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44.

    Elosegui-Artola A, Andreu I, Beedle AEM, Lezamiz A, Uroz M et al. 2017. Force triggers YAP nuclear entry by regulating transport across nuclear pores. Cell 171:1397–410.e14
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45.

    Panciera T, Azzolin L, Cordenonsi M, Piccolo S. 2017. Mechanobiology of YAP and TAZ in physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18:758–70
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46.

    Ralston A, Rossant J. 2008. Cdx2 acts downstream of cell polarization to cell-autonomously promote trophectoderm fate in the early mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 313:614–29
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47.

    Strumpf D, Mao CA, Yamanaka Y, Ralston A, Chawengsaksophak K et al. 2005. Cdx2 is required for correct cell fate specification and differentiation of trophectoderm in the mouse blastocyst. Development 132:2093–102
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48.

    Nishioka N, Inoue K, Adachi K, Kiyonari H, Ota M et al. 2009. The Hippo signaling pathway components Lats and Yap pattern Tead4 activity to distinguish mouse trophectoderm from inner cell mass. Dev. Cell 16:398–410
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49.

    Niwa H, Toyooka Y, Shimosato D, Strumpf D, Takahashi K et al. 2005. Interaction between Oct3/4 and Cdx2 determines trophectoderm differentiation. Cell 123:917–29
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50.

    Frum T, Murphy TM, Ralston A 2018. HIPPO signaling resolves embryonic cell fate conflicts during establishment of pluripotency in vivo. eLife 7:e42298
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51.

    Trimarchi JR, Liu L, Porterfield DM, Smith PJ, Keefe DL. 2000. Oxidative phosphorylation-dependent and -independent oxygen consumption by individual preimplantation mouse embryos. Biol. Reprod. 62:1866–74
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52.

    Kaneko KJ, DePamphilis ML. 2013. TEAD4 establishes the energy homeostasis essential for blastocoel formation. Development 140:3680–90
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53.

    Kumar RP, Ray S, Home P, Saha B, Bhattacharya B et al. 2018. Regulation of energy metabolism during early mammalian development: TEAD4 controls mitochondrial transcription. Development 145:dev162644
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54.

    Nishioka N, Yamamoto S, Kiyonari H, Sato H, Sawada A et al. 2008. Tead4 is required for specification of trophectoderm in pre-implantation mouse embryos. Mech. Dev. 125:270–83
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55.

    Yagi R, Kohn MJ, Karavanova I, Kaneko KJ, Vullhorst D et al. 2007. Transcription factor TEAD4 specifies the trophectoderm lineage at the beginning of mammalian development. Development 134:3827–36
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56.

    Chazaud C, Yamanaka Y, Pawson T, Rossant J. 2006. Early lineage segregation between epiblast and primitive endoderm in mouse blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK pathway. Dev. Cell 10:615–24
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57.

    Ohnishi Y, Huber W, Tsumura A, Kang M, Xenopoulos P et al. 2014. Cell-to-cell expression variability followed by signal reinforcement progressively segregates early mouse lineages. Nat. Cell Biol. 16:27–37
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58.

    Schrode N, Saiz N, Di Talia S, Hadjantonakis AK. 2014. GATA6 levels modulate primitive endoderm cell fate choice and timing in the mouse blastocyst. Dev. Cell 29:454–67
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59.

    Frankenberg S, Gerbe F, Bessonnard S, Belville C, Pouchin P et al. 2011. Primitive endoderm differentiates via a three-step mechanism involving Nanog and RTK signaling. Dev. Cell 21:1005–13
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60.

    Plusa B, Piliszek A, Frankenberg S, Artus J, Hadjantonakis AK. 2008. Distinct sequential cell behaviours direct primitive endoderm formation in the mouse blastocyst. Development 135:3081–91
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61.

    Saiz N, Grabarek JB, Sabherwal N, Papalopulu N, Plusa B. 2013. Atypical protein kinase C couples cell sorting with primitive endoderm maturation in the mouse blastocyst. Development 140:4311–22
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62.

    Wennekamp S, Mesecke S, Nedelec F, Hiiragi T. 2013. A self-organization framework for symmetry breaking in the mammalian embryo. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14:452–59
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63.

    Rossant J, Tam PP. 2009. Blastocyst lineage formation, early embryonic asymmetries and axis patterning in the mouse. Development 136:701–13
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64.

    Ryan AQ, Chan CJ, Graner F, Hiiragi T. 2019. Lumen expansion facilitates epiblast-primitive endoderm fate specification during mouse blastocyst formation. Dev. Cell 51:684–97.e4
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65.

    Wang X, Zhang Z, Tao H, Liu J, Hopyan S, Sun Y. 2018. Characterizing inner pressure and stiffness of trophoblast and inner cell mass of blastocysts. Biophys. J. 115:2443–50
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66.

    Chan CJ, Costanzo M, Ruiz-Herrero T, Monke G, Petrie RJ et al. 2019. Hydraulic control of mammalian embryo size and cell fate. Nature 571:112–16
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67.

    Weberling A, Zernicka-Goetz M. 2021. Trophectoderm mechanics direct epiblast shape upon embryo implantation. Cell Rep 34:108655
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68.

    Christodoulou N, Weberling A, Strathdee D, Anderson KI, Timpson P, Zernicka-Goetz M. 2019. Morphogenesis of extra-embryonic tissues directs the remodelling of the mouse embryo at implantation. Nat. Commun. 10:3557
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69.

    Varmuza S, Prideaux V, Kothary R, Rossant J. 1988. Polytene chromosomes in mouse trophoblast giant cells. Development 102:127–34
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70.

    Screen M, Dean W, Cross JC, Hemberger M. 2008. Cathepsin proteases have distinct roles in trophoblast function and vascular remodelling. Development 135:3311–20
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71.

    Parast MM, Aeder S, Sutherland AE. 2001. Trophoblast giant-cell differentiation involves changes in cytoskeleton and cell motility. Dev. Biol. 230:43–60
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72.

    Bevilacqua EM, Abrahamsohn PA. 1989. Trophoblast invasion during implantation of the mouse embryo. Arch. Biol. Med. Exp. 22:107–18
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73.

    Reuss B, Hellmann P, Dahl E, Traub O, Butterweck A et al. 1996. Connexins and E-cadherin are differentially expressed during trophoblast invasion and placenta differentiation in the rat. Dev. Dyn. 205:172–82
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74.

    Zhang T, Guo S, Zhou H, Wu Z, Liu J et al. 2021. Endometrial extracellular matrix rigidity and IFNτ ensure the establishment of early pregnancy through activation of YAP. Cell Prolif. 54:e12976
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75.

    Nieto MA. 2011. The ins and outs of the epithelial to mesenchymal transition in health and disease. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27:347–76
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76.

    Lee K, Nelson CM. 2012. New insights into the regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tissue fibrosis. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol 294:171–221
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77.

    Savagner P. 2015. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: from cell plasticity to concept elasticity. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol 112:273–300
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78.

    Lamouille S, Xu J, Derynck R. 2014. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15:178–96
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79.

    Leight JL, Wozniak MA, Chen S, Lynch ML, Chen CS. 2012. Matrix rigidity regulates a switch between TGF-β1-induced apoptosis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Mol. Biol. Cell 23:781–91
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80.

    Lee K, Chen QK, Lui C, Cichon MA, Radisky DC, Nelson CM. 2012. Matrix compliance regulates Rac1b localization, NADPH oxidase assembly, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Mol. Biol. Cell 23:4097–108
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81.

    Wei SC, Fattet L, Tsai JH, Guo Y, Pai VH et al. 2015. Matrix stiffness drives epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumour metastasis through a TWIST1-G3BP2 mechanotransduction pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 17:678–88
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82.

    Brown AC, Fiore VF, Sulchek TA, Barker TH. 2013. Physical and chemical microenvironmental cues orthogonally control the degree and duration of fibrosis-associated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions. J. Pathol. 229:25–35
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83.

    Matsuzaki S, Darcha C, Pouly JL, Canis M. 2017. Effects of matrix stiffness on epithelial to mesenchymal transition-like processes of endometrial epithelial cells: implications for the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Sci. Rep. 7:44616
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84.

    Chen QK, Lee K, Radisky DC, Nelson CM. 2013. Extracellular matrix proteins regulate epithelial-mesenchymal transition in mammary epithelial cells. Differentiation 86:126–32
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85.

    Comaills V, Kabeche L, Morris R, Buisson R, Yu M et al. 2016. Genomic instability is induced by persistent proliferation of cells undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Cell Rep 17:2632–47
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86.

    Simi AK, Anlas AA, Stallings-Mann M, Zhang S, Hsia T et al. 2018. A soft microenvironment protects from failure of midbody abscission and multinucleation downstream of the EMT-promoting transcription factor Snail. Cancer Res 78:2277–89
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87.

    Rabie EM, Zhang SX, Dunn CE, Nelson CM. 2021. Substratum stiffness signals through integrin-linked kinase and β1-integrin to regulate midbody proteins and abscission during EMT. Mol. Biol. Cell 32:1664–76
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88.

    Copp AJ. 1979. Interaction between inner cell mass and trophectoderm of the mouse blastocyst. II. The fate of the polar trophectoderm. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 51:109–20
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89.

    Cockburn K, Rossant J. 2010. Making the blastocyst: lessons from the mouse. J. Clin. Investig. 120:995–1003
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90.

    Qin H, Blaschke K, Wei G, Ohi Y, Blouin L et al. 2012. Transcriptional analysis of pluripotency reveals the Hippo pathway as a barrier to reprogramming. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21:2054–67
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91.

    Grapin-Botton A, Constam D. 2007. Evolution of the mechanisms and molecular control of endoderm formation. Mech. Dev. 124:253–78
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92.

    Solnica-Krezel L. 2005. Conserved patterns of cell movements during vertebrate gastrulation. Curr. Biol. 15:R213–28
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93.

    Kyprianou C, Christodoulou N, Hamilton RS, Nahaboo W, Boomgaard DS et al. 2020. Basement membrane remodelling regulates mouse embryogenesis. Nature 582:253–58
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94.

    Srinivas S, Rodriguez T, Clements M, Smith JC, Beddington RS. 2004. Active cell migration drives the unilateral movements of the anterior visceral endoderm. Development 131:1157–64
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95.

    Arnold SJ, Robertson EJ. 2009. Making a commitment: cell lineage allocation and axis patterning in the early mouse embryo. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:91–103
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96.

    Shioi G, Hoshino H, Abe T, Kiyonari H, Nakao K et al. 2017. Apical constriction in distal visceral endoderm cells initiates global, collective cell rearrangement in embryonic visceral endoderm to form anterior visceral endoderm. Dev. Biol. 429:20–30
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97.

    Migeotte I, Omelchenko T, Hall A, Anderson KV. 2010. Rac1-dependent collective cell migration is required for specification of the anterior-posterior body axis of the mouse. PLOS Biol 8:e1000442
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98.

    Trichas G, Smith AM, White N, Wilkins V, Watanabe T et al. 2012. Multi-cellular rosettes in the mouse visceral endoderm facilitate the ordered migration of anterior visceral endoderm cells. PLOS Biol 10:e1001256
    [Google Scholar]
99. 99.

    Omelchenko T, Rabadan MA, Hernandez-Martinez R, Grego-Bessa J, KV Anderson, Hall A. 2014. β-Pix directs collective migration of anterior visceral endoderm cells in the early mouse embryo. Genes Dev 28:2764–77
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100.

     Thompson DW. 1917. On Growth and Form Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
101. 101.

     Park JA, Kim JH, Bi D, Mitchel JA, Qazvini NT et al. 2015. Unjamming and cell shape in the asthmatic airway epithelium. Nat. Mater. 14:1040–48
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102.

     Bi D, Yang X, Marchetti MC, Manning ML. 2016. Motility-driven glass and jamming transitions in biological tissues. Phys. Rev. X 6:021011
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103.

     Schotz EM, Lanio M, Talbot JA, Manning ML. 2013. Glassy dynamics in three-dimensional embryonic tissues. J. R. Soc. Interface 10:20130726
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104.

     Atia L, Fredberg JJ, Gov NS, Pegoraro AF. 2021. Are cell jamming and unjamming essential in tissue development? Cells Dev. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdev.2021.203727
     [Crossref]
105. 105.

     Atia L, Bi D, Sharma Y, Mitchel JA, Gweon B et al. 2018. Geometric constraints during epithelial jamming. Nat. Phys. 14:613–20
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106.

     Wang X, Merkel M, Sutter LB, Erdemci-Tandogan G, Manning ML, Kasza KE. 2020. Anisotropy links cell shapes to tissue flow during convergent extension. PNAS 117:13541–51
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107.

     Iyer KV, Piscitello-Gomez R, Paijmans J, Julicher F, Eaton S. 2019. Epithelial viscoelasticity is regulated by mechanosensitive E-cadherin turnover. Curr. Biol. 29:578–91.e5
     [Google Scholar]
108. 108.

     Petridou NI, Corominas-Murtra B, Heisenberg CP, Hannezo E. 2021. Rigidity percolation uncovers a structural basis for embryonic tissue phase transitions. Cell 184:1914–28.e19
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109.

     Petridou NI, Heisenberg CP. 2019. Tissue rheology in embryonic organization. EMBO J 38:e102497
     [Google Scholar]
110. 110.

     Mongera A, Rowghanian P, Gustafson HJ, Shelton E, Kealhofer DA et al. 2018. A fluid-to-solid jamming transition underlies vertebrate body axis elongation. Nature 561:401–5
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111.

     Lawton AK, Nandi A, Stulberg MJ, Dray N, Sneddon MW et al. 2013. Regulated tissue fluidity steers zebrafish body elongation. Development 140:573–82
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112.

     Kim S, Pochitaloff M, Stooke-Vaughan GA, Campas O 2021. Embryonic tissues as active foams. Nat. Phys. 17:859–66
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113.

     David R, Luu O, Damm EW, Wen JW, Nagel M, Winklbauer R. 2014. Tissue cohesion and the mechanics of cell rearrangement. Development 141:3672–82
     [Google Scholar]
114. 114.

     Saadaoui M, Rocancourt D, Roussel J, Corson F, Gros J. 2020. A tensile ring drives tissue flows to shape the gastrulating amniote embryo. Science 367:453–58
     [Google Scholar]
115. 115.

     Benazeraf B, Francois P, Baker RE, Denans N, Little CD, Pourquie O. 2010. A random cell motility gradient downstream of FGF controls elongation of an amniote embryo. Nature 466:248–52
     [Google Scholar]
116. 116.

     Spurlin JW, Siedlik MJ, Nerger BA, Pang MF, Jayaraman S et al. 2019. Mesenchymal proteases and tissue fluidity remodel the extracellular matrix during airway epithelial branching in the embryonic avian lung. Development 146:dev175257
     [Google Scholar]
117. 117.

     Chambers I, Smith A. 2004. Self-renewal of teratocarcinoma and embryonic stem cells. Oncogene 23:7150–60
     [Google Scholar]
118. 118.

     Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H, Segawa K, Murakami M et al. 2003. The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 113:631–42
     [Google Scholar]
119. 119.

     Nichols J, Zevnik B, Anastassiadis K, Niwa H, Klewe-Nebenius D et al. 1998. Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell 95:379–91
     [Google Scholar]
120. 120.

     Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. 2006. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126:663–76
     [Google Scholar]
121. 121.

     Ramalho-Santos M, Yoon S, Matsuzaki Y, Mulligan RC, Melton DA. 2002.. “ Stemness”: transcriptional profiling of embryonic and adult stem cells. Science 298:597–600
     [Google Scholar]
122. 122.

     Lian I, Kim J, Okazawa H, Zhao J, Zhao B et al. 2010. The role of YAP transcription coactivator in regulating stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Genes Dev 24:1106–18
     [Google Scholar]
123. 123.

     Serra D, Mayr U, Boni A, Lukonin I, Rempfler M et al. 2019. Self-organization and symmetry breaking in intestinal organoid development. Nature 569:66–72
     [Google Scholar]
124. 124.

     Nelson CM. 2021. The mechanics of crypt morphogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 23:678–79
     [Google Scholar]
125. 125.

     Yang Q, Xue SL, Chan CJ, Rempfler M, Vischi D et al. 2021. Cell fate coordinates mechano-osmotic forces in intestinal crypt formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 23:733–44
     [Google Scholar]
126. 126.

     Nelson CM, Gleghorn JP, Pang MF, Jaslove JM, Goodwin K et al. 2017. Microfluidic chest cavities reveal that transmural pressure controls the rate of lung development. Development 144:4328–35
     [Google Scholar]
127. 127.

     Li J, Wang Z, Chu Q, Jiang K, Li J, Tang N 2018. The strength of mechanical forces determines the differentiation of alveolar epithelial cells. Dev. Cell 44:297–312.e5
     [Google Scholar]