1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering
  4. Volume 24, 2022
  5. Article

Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering

Volume 24, 2022

Deep Learning and Medical Image Analysis for COVID-19 Diagnosis and Prediction

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has imposed dramatic challenges to health-care organizations worldwide. To combat the global crisis, the use of thoracic imaging has played a major role in the diagnosis, prediction, and management of COVID-19 patients with moderate to severe symptoms or with evidence of worsening respiratory status. In response, the medical image analysis community acted quickly to develop and disseminate deep learning models and tools to meet the urgent need of managing and interpreting large amounts of COVID-19 imaging data. This review aims to not only summarize existing deep learning and medical image analysis methods but also offer in-depth discussions and recommendations for future investigations. We believe that the wide availability of high-quality, curated, and benchmarked COVID-19 imaging data sets offers the great promise of a transformative test bed to develop, validate, and disseminate novel deep learning methods in the frontiers of data science and artificial intelligence.

Keyword(s): COVID-19, deep learning, medical image analysis, medical imaging, radiology
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-110220-012203
2022-06-06
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/bioeng/24/1/annurev-bioeng-110220-012203.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-110220-012203&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Rubin GD, Ryerson CJ, Haramati LB, Sverzellati N, Kanne JP et al. 2020. The role of chest imaging in patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multinational consensus statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 296:1172–80
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.
    Fang Y, Zhang H, Xie J, Lin M, Ying L et al. 2020. Sensitivity of chest CT for COVID-19: comparison to RT-PCR. Radiology 296:2E115–17
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.
    Caruso D, Zerunian M, Polici M, Pucciarelli F, Polidori T et al. 2020. Chest CT features of COVID-19 in Rome, Italy. Radiology 296:2E79–85
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.
    Ye Z, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Huang Z, Song B. 2020. Chest CT manifestations of new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a pictorial review. Eur. Radiol. 30:84381–89
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.
    Ng M-Y, Lee EY, Yang J, Yang F, Li X et al. 2020. Imaging profile of the COVID-19 infection: radiologic findings and literature review. Radiol. Cardiothorac. Imaging 2:1e200034
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.
    Zhao W, Zhong Z, Xie X, Yu Q, Liu J 2020. CT scans of patients with 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia. Theranostics 10:104606–13
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 7.
    Xie X, Zhong Z, Zhao W, Zheng C, Wang F et al. 2020. Chest CT for typical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia: relationship to negative RT-PCR testing. Radiology 296:2E41–45
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 8.
    Chua F, Armstrong-James D, Desai SR, Barnett J, Kouranos V et al. 2020. The role of CT in case ascertainment and management of COVID-19 pneumonia in the UK: insights from high-incidence regions. Lancet Respir. Med. 8:5438–40
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 9.
    Liu T, Shen D, Gao Y, Greenspan H, Niessen W et al. 2021. Special issue on intelligent analysis of COVID-19 imaging data. Med. Image Anal. 71:102056
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 10.
    Shen D, Gao Y, Munoz-Barrutia A, Debuc DC, Percannella G. 2020. Guest editorial: special issue on imaging-based diagnosis of COVID-19. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39:82569–71
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 11.
    Di D, Shi F, Yan F, Xia L, Mo Z et al. 2021. Hypergraph learning for identification of COVID-19 with CT imaging. Med. Image Anal. 68:101910
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 12.
    Wu X, Chen C, Zhong M, Wang J, Shi J 2021. COVID-AL: the diagnosis of COVID-19 with deep active learning. Med. Image Anal. 68:101913
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 13.
    Gao K, Su J, Jiang Z, Zeng L-L, Feng Z et al. 2021. Dual-branch combination network (DCN): towards accurate diagnosis and lesion segmentation of COVID-19 using CT images. Med. Image Anal. 67:101836
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 14.
    Yang D, Xu Z, Li W, Myronenko A, Roth HR et al. 2021. Federated semi-supervised learning for COVID region segmentation in chest CT using multi-national data from China, Italy, Japan. Med. Image Anal. 70:101992
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 15.
    Fan D-P, Zhou T, Ji G-P, Zhou Y, Chen G et al. 2020. Inf-Net: automatic COVID-19 lung infection segmentation from CT images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39:82626–37
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 16.
    Roy S, Menapace W, Oei S, Luijten B, Fini E et al. 2020. Deep learning for classification and localization of COVID-19 markers in point-of-care lung ultrasound. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39:82676–87
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 17.
    Xie W, Jacobs C, Charbonnier J-P, Van Ginneken B. 2020. Relational modeling for robust and efficient pulmonary lobe segmentation in CT scans. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39:82664–75
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 18.
    Wang G, Liu X, Li C, Xu Z, Ruan J et al. 2020. A noise-robust framework for automatic segmentation of COVID-19 pneumonia lesions from CT images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39:82653–63
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 19.
    Zhou L, Li Z, Zhou J, Li H, Chen Y et al. 2020. A rapid, accurate and machine-agnostic segmentation and quantification method for CT-based COVID-19 diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39:82638–52
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 20.
    Wang X, Deng X, Fu Q, Zhou Q, Feng J et al. 2020. A weakly-supervised framework for COVID-19 classification and lesion localization from chest CT. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39:82615–25
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 21.
    Oh Y, Park S, Ye JC. 2020. Deep learning COVID-19 features on CXR using limited training data sets. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39:82688–700
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 22.
    Ouyang X, Huo J, Xia L, Shan F, Liu J et al. 2020. Dual-sampling attention network for diagnosis of COVID-19 from community acquired pneumonia. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39:82595–605
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 23.
    Kang H, Xia L, Yan F, Wan Z, Shi F et al. 2020. Diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with structured latent multi-view representation learning. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39:82606–14
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 24.
    Zhu X, Song B, Shi F, Chen Y, Hu R et al. 2021. Joint prediction and time estimation of COVID-19 developing severe symptoms using chest CT scan. Med. Image Anal. 67:101824
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 25.
    Chassagnon G, Vakalopoulou M, Battistella E, Christodoulidis S, Hoang-Thi T-N et al. 2021. AI-driven quantification, staging and outcome prediction of COVID-19 pneumonia. Med. Image Anal. 67:101860
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 26.
    Xue W, Cao C, Liu J, Duan Y, Cao H et al. 2021. Modality alignment contrastive learning for severity assessment of COVID-19 from lung ultrasound and clinical information. Med. Image Anal. 69:101975
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 27.
    Zhong A, Li X, Wu D, Ren H, Kim K et al. 2021. Deep metric learning-based image retrieval system for chest radiograph and its clinical applications in COVID-19. Med. Image Anal. 70:101993
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 28.
    Goncharov M, Pisov M, Shevtsov A, Shirokikh B, Kurmukov A et al. 2021. CT-based COVID-19 triage: deep multitask learning improves joint identification and severity quantification. Med. Image Anal. 71:102054
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 29.
    Han Z, Wei B, Hong Y, Li T, Cong J et al. 2020. Accurate screening of COVID-19 using attention-based deep 3D multiple instance learning. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39:82584–94
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 30.
    Wang J, Bao Y, Wen Y, Lu H, Luo H et al. 2020. Prior-attention residual learning for more discriminative COVID-19 screening in CT images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39:82572–83
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 31.
    Karanam S, Li R, Yang F, Hu W, Chen T et al. 2020. Towards contactless patient positioning. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39:82701–10
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 32.
    Greenspan H, Estépar RSJ, Niessen WJ, Siegel E, Nielsen M. 2020. Position paper on COVID-19 imaging and AI: from the clinical needs and technological challenges to initial AI solutions at the lab and national level towards a new era for AI in healthcare. Med. Image Anal. 66:101800
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 33.
    Shi F, Wang J, Shi J, Wu Z, Wang Q et al. 2020. Review of artificial intelligence techniques in imaging data acquisition, segmentation, and diagnosis for COVID-19. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14:4–15
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 34.
    Dong D, Tang Z, Wang S, Hui H, Gong L et al. 2020. The role of imaging in the detection and management of COVID-19: a review. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14:16–29
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 35.
    Roberts M, Driggs D, Thorpe M, Gilbey J, Yeung M et al. 2021. Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 using chest radiographs and CT scans. Nat. Mach. Intel. 3:3199–217
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 36.
    Hryniewska W, Bombiński P, Szatkowski P, Tomaszewska P, Przelaskowski A et al. 2021. Checklist for responsible deep learning modeling of medical images based on COVID-19 detection studies. Pattern Recognit 118:108035
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 37.
    Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. 2015. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention234–41 Cham, Switzerland: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 38.
    Milletari F, Navab N, Ahmadi S-A. 2016. V-Net: fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation. 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV)565–71 New York: IEEE
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 39.
    Zhou Z, Siddiquee MMR, Tajbakhsh N, Liang J. 2018. UNet++: a nested U-Net architecture for medical image segmentation. Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support3–11 Cham, Switzerland: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 40.
    He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition770–78 New York: IEEE
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 41.
    Zahiri J, Afsharinia MH, Hekmati Z, Khodarahmi M, Hekmati S et al. 2020. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) candidate chest CT features: a systematic review of extracted imaging features from 7571 individuals. medRxiv 2020.11.03.20225326. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.03.20225326
    [Crossref]
  42. 42.
    Zoph B, Le QV. 2016. Neural architecture search with reinforcement learning. arXiv:1611.01578 [cs.LG]
  43. 43.
    Elsken T, Metzen JH, Hutter F. 2019. Neural architecture search: a survey. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 20:11997–2017
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 44.
    Li Q, Wu X, Liu T. 2021. Differentiable neural architecture search for optimal spatial/temporal brain function network decomposition. Med. Image Anal. 69:101974
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 45.
    Qiang N, Dong Q, Zhang W, Ge B, Ge F et al. 2020. Modeling task-based fMRI data via deep belief network with neural architecture search. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 83:101747
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 46.
    Faes L, Wagner SK, Fu DJ, Liu X, Korot E et al. 2019. Automated deep learning design for medical image classification by health-care professionals with no coding experience: a feasibility study. Lancet Digital Health 1:5e232–42
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 47.
    Chen Y, Meng G, Zhang Q, Xiang S, Huang C et al. 2019. RENAS: reinforced evolutionary neural architecture search. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition4787–96 New York: IEEE
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 48.
    Elsken T, Metzen JH, Hutter F. 2018. Efficient multi-objective neural architecture search via Lamarckian evolution. arXiv:1804.09081 [stat.ML]
  49. 49.
    Real E, Aggarwal A, Huang Y, Le QV. 2019. Regularized evolution for image classifier architecture search. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence4780–89 Palo Alto, Calif: AAAI
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 50.
    Ren P, Xiao Y, Chang X, Huang P-Y, Li Z et al. 2020. A comprehensive survey of neural architecture search: challenges and solutions. arXiv:2006.02903 [cs.LG]
  51. 51.
    He X, Wang S, Shi S, Chu X, Tang J et al. 2020. Benchmarking deep learning models and automated model design for COVID-19 detection with chest CT scans. medRxiv 2020.06.08.20125963. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.08.20125963
    [Crossref]
  52. 52.
    He X, Wang S, Ying G, Zhang J, Chu X. 2021. Efficient multi-objective evolutionary 3D neural architecture search for COVID-19 detection with chest CT scans. arXiv:2101.10667 [eess.IV]
  53. 53.
    Wang L, Lin ZQ, Wong A. 2020. Covid-Net: a tailored deep convolutional neural network design for detection of COVID-19 cases from chest X-ray images. Sci. Rep. 10:119549
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 54.
    Gunraj H, Wang L, Wong A. 2020. COVIDNet-CT: a tailored deep convolutional neural network design for detection of COVID-19 cases from chest CT images. Front. Med. 7:608525
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 55.
    Pham H, Guan M, Zoph B, Le Q, Dean J 2018. Efficient neural architecture search via parameters sharing. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 80:4095–104
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 56.
    Li C, Peng J, Yuan L, Wang G, Liang X et al. 2020. Block-wisely supervised neural architecture search with knowledge distillation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition1989–98 New York: IEEE
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 57.
    Saikia T, Marrakchi Y, Zela A, Hutter F, Brox T. 2019. AutoDispNet: improving disparity estimation with AutoML. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision1812–23 New York: IEEE
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 58.
    Shin R, Packer C, Song D. 2018. Differentiable neural network architecture search Paper presented at 6th International Conference on Learning Representations Vancouver, BC, Canada: Apr. 30–May 3
  59. 59.
    Liu H, Simonyan K, Yang Y. 2018. DARTS: differentiable architecture search. arXiv:1806.09055 [cs.LG]
  60. 60.
    Fang J, Sun Y, Peng K, Zhang Q, Li Y et al. 2020. Fast neural network adaptation via parameter remapping and architecture search. arXiv:2001.02525 [cs.CV]
  61. 61.
    DeGrave AJ, Janizek JD, Lee S-I. 2021. AI for radiographic COVID-19 detection selects shortcuts over signal. Nat. Mach. Intel. 3:610–19
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 62.
    Roelofs R, Fridovich-Keil S, Miller J, Shankar V, Hardt M et al. 2019. A meta-analysis of overfitting in machine learning. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems9179–89 San Diego, Calif: Neural Inf. Process. Syst. Found.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. 63.
    Hendrycks D, Gimpel K. 2016. A baseline for detecting misclassified and out-of-distribution examples in neural networks. arXiv:1610.02136 [cs.NE]
  64. 64.
    Futoma J, Simons M, Panch T, Doshi-Velez F, Celi LA. 2020. The myth of generalisability in clinical research and machine learning in health care. Lancet Digital Health 2:9e489–92
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 65.
    Pan SJ, Yang Q 2009. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Eng. 22:101345–59
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 66.
    Zhuang F, Qi Z, Duan K, Xi D, Zhu Y et al. 2020. A comprehensive survey on transfer learning. Proc. IEEE 109:143–76
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 67.
    Farahani A, Voghoei S, Rasheed K, Arabnia HR. 2020. A brief review of domain adaptation. arXiv:2010.03978 [cs.LG]
  68. 68.
    Wang M, Deng W. 2018. Deep visual domain adaptation: a survey. Neurocomputing 312:135–53
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 69.
    Chen M, Weinberger KQ, Blitzer J. 2011. Co-training for domain adaptation. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems2456–64 San Diego, Calif: Neural Inf. Process. Syst. Found.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. 70.
    Yang L, Wang Y, Gao M, Shrivastava A, Weinberger KQ et al. 2020. Deep co-training with task decomposition for semi-supervised domain adaptation. arXiv:2007.12684 [cs.CV]
  71. 71.
    Liu Y, Ji S 2021. A multi-stage attentive transfer learning framework for improving COVID-19 diagnosis. arXiv:2101.05410 [eess.IV]
  72. 72.
    Jin Q, Cui H, Sun C, Meng Z, Wei L et al. 2021. Domain adaptation based self-correction model for COVID-19 infection segmentation in CT images. Expert Syst. Appl. 176:114848
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 73.
    Saito K, Kim D, Sclaroff S, Darrell T, Saenko K 2019. Semi-supervised domain adaptation via minimax entropy. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision8050–58 New York: IEEE
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 74.
    Long M, Cao Y, Wang J, Jordan M. 2015. Learning transferable features with deep adaptation networks. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 37:97–105
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 75.
    Degtiar I, Rose S. 2021. A review of generalizability and transportability. arXiv:2102.11904 [stat.ME]
  76. 76.
    Liu T. 2021. Grand challenges in AI in radiology. Front. Radiol. 1:629992
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 77.
    Langlotz CP, Allen B, Erickson BJ, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Bigelow K et al. 2019. A roadmap for foundational research on artificial intelligence in medical imaging: from the 2018 NIH/RSNA/ACR/The Academy Workshop. Radiology 291:3781–91
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 78.
    Xie N, Ras G, van Gerven M, Doran D. 2020. Explainable deep learning: a field guide for the uninitiated. arXiv:2004.14545 [cs.LG]
  79. 79.
    Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, Vedantam R, Parikh D et al. 2017. Grad-CAM: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)618–26 New York: IEEE
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 80.
    Geirhos R, Jacobsen J-H, Michaelis C, Zemel R, Brendel W et al. 2020. Shortcut learning in deep neural networks. Nat. Mach. Intel. 2:11665–73
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 81.
    Poggio T, Banburski A, Liao Q. 2020. Theoretical issues in deep networks. PNAS 117:4830039–45
     [Google Scholar]
  82. 82.
    Du M, Yang F, Zou N, Hu X. 2020. Fairness in deep learning: a computational perspective. IEEE Intel. Syst. 36:425–34
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 83.
    Wolff RF, Moons KG, Riley RD, Whiting PF, Westwood M et al. 2019. PROBAST: a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies. Ann. Intern. Med. 170:151–58
     [Google Scholar]
  84. 84.
    Bellamy RK, Dey K, Hind M, Hoffman SC, Houde S et al. 2018. AI Fairness 360: an extensible toolkit for detecting, understanding, and mitigating unwanted algorithmic bias. arXiv:1810.01943 [cs.AI]
  85. 85.
    Bose A, Hamilton W. 2019. Compositional fairness constraints for graph embeddings. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res. 97:715–24
     [Google Scholar]
  86. 86.
    Brady E, Nielsen MW, Andersen JP, Oertelt-Prigione S. 2021. Lack of consideration of sex and gender in COVID-19 clinical studies. Nat. Commun. 12:14015
     [Google Scholar]
  87. 87.
    Dignum V. 2019. Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature
  88. 88.
    Geis JR, Brady AP, Wu CC, Spencer J, Ranschaert E et al. 2019. Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement. Can. Assoc. Radiol. J. 70:4329–34
     [Google Scholar]
  89. 89.
    Cheplygina V. 2019. Cats or CAT scans: transfer learning from natural or medical image source data sets?. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 9:21–27
     [Google Scholar]
  90. 90.
    Luan H, Qi F, Xue Z, Chen L, Shen D 2008. Multimodality image registration by maximization of quantitative–qualitative measure of mutual information. Pattern Recognit. 41:1285–98
     [Google Scholar]
  91. 91.
    Jia H, Wu G, Wang Q, Shen D 2010. ABSORB: Atlas building by self-organized registration and bundling. NeuroImage 51:31057–70
     [Google Scholar]
  92. 92.
    Aono Y, Hayashi T, Wang L, Moriai S. 2017. Privacy-preserving deep learning via additively homomorphic encryption. IEEE Trans. Inform. Forens. Sec. 13:51333–45
     [Google Scholar]
  93. 93.
    Park S, Kim G, Oh Y, Seo JB, Lee SM et al. 2021. Vision transformer for COVID-19 CXR diagnosis using chest X-ray feature corpus. arXiv:2103.07055 [eess.IV]
  94. 94.
    Saha P, Mukherjee D, Singh PK, Ahmadian A, Ferrara M et al. 2021. GraphCovidNet: a graph neural network based model for detecting COVID-19 from CT scans and X-rays of chest. Sci. Rep. 11:18304
     [Google Scholar]
  95. 95.
    Yu X, Lu S, Guo L, Wang S-H, Zhang Y-D. 2021. ResGNet-C: a graph convolutional neural network for detection of COVID-19. Neurocomputing 452:592–605
     [Google Scholar]
  96. 96.
    Bengio Y, Lecun Y, Hinton G. 2020. Deep learning for AI. Commun. ACM 64:758–65
     [Google Scholar]
  97. 97.
    Cleverley J, Piper J, Jones MM. 2020. The role of chest radiography in confirming covid-19 pneumonia. BMJ 370:m2426
     [Google Scholar]
  98. 98.
    Yau O, Gin K, Luong C, Jue J, Abolmaesumi P et al. 2021. Point-of-care ultrasound in the COVID-19 era: a scoping review. Echocardiography 38:2329–42
     [Google Scholar]
  99. 99.
    Sultan LR, Sehgal CM. 2020. A review of early experience in lung ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 46:92530–45
     [Google Scholar]
  100. 100.
    Tung-Chen Y, de Gracia MM, Díez-Tascón A, Alonso-González R, Agudo-Fernández S et al. 2020. Correlation between chest computed tomography and lung ultrasonography in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Ultrasound Med. Biol. 46:112918–26
     [Google Scholar]
  101. 101.
    Deng Y, Lei L, Chen Y, Zhang W. 2020. The potential added value of FDG PET/CT for COVID-19 pneumonia. Eur. J. Nuclear Med. Mol. Imaging 47:71634–35
     [Google Scholar]
  102. 102.
    Joob B, Wiwanitkit V. 2020. 18F-FDG PET/CT and COVID-19. Eur. J. Nuclear Med. Mol. Imaging 47:61348
     [Google Scholar]
  103. 103.
    Larici AR, Cicchetti G, Marano R, Merlino B, Elia L et al. 2020. Multimodality imaging of COVID-19 pneumonia: from diagnosis to follow-up. A comprehensive review. Eur. J. Radiol. 131:109217
     [Google Scholar]
  104. 104.
    Guo G, Liu Z, Zhao S, Guo L, Liu T. 2021. Eliminating indefiniteness of clinical spectrum for better screening COVID-19. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 25:51347–57
     [Google Scholar]
  105. 105.
    Chen Y, Ouyang L, Bao FS, Li Q, Han L et al. 2021. A multimodality machine learning approach to differentiate severe and nonsevere COVID-19: model development and validation. J. Med. Internet Res. 23:4e23948
     [Google Scholar]
  106. 106.
    Xu M, Ouyang L, Han L, Sun K, Yu T et al. 2021. Accurately differentiating between patients with COVID-19, patients with other viral infections, and healthy individuals: multimodal late fusion learning approach. J. Med. Internet Res. 23:1e25535
     [Google Scholar]
  107. 107.
    Fu H, Fan D-P, Chen G, Zhou T. 2020. COVID-19 imaging-based AI research collection GitHub San Francisco: updated May 25, 2021. https://github.com/HzFu/COVID19_imaging_AI_paper_list
  108. 108.
    Jeon J, Kim H. 2020. AI technology to fight against coronavirus (COVID-19) GitHub San Francisco: updated May 25, 2020. https://github.com/hollobit/COVID-19-AI
  109. 109.
    Natl. Inst. Health 2020. Medical Imaging Data Resource Center https://www.midrc.org/
  110. 110.
    Cent. Transl. Data Sci 2020. Gen3 Data Commons https://gen3.org/
  111. 111.
    Eur. Soc. Med. Imaging Inform., Robovision, Quibim 2021. Imaging COVID-19 AI Initiative https://datacollaboratives.org/cases/imaging-covid-19-ai-initiative.html
  112. 112.
    Zhang K, Liu X, Shen J, Li Z, Sang Y et al. 2020. Clinically applicable AI system for accurate diagnosis, quantitative measurements, and prognosis of COVID-19 pneumonia using computed tomography. Cell 181:61423–33.e1411
     [Google Scholar]
  113. 113.
    Li Y, Pei X, Guo Y 2021. A 3D CNN classification model for accurate diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 using computed tomography images. medRxiv 2021.01.21.21249999. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.21.21249999
    [Crossref]
  114. 114.
    Benjamens S, Dhunnoo P, Meskó B. 2020. The state of artificial intelligence-based FDA-approved medical devices and algorithms: an online database. NPJ Digital Med 3:118
     [Google Scholar]
  115. 115.
    Topol EJ. 2019. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat. Med. 25:144–56
     [Google Scholar]
  116. 116.
    Weinstein E. 2020. China's use of AI in its COVID-19-response CSET Data Brief, Cent. Secur. Emerg. Technol. Washington, DC: https://doi.org/10.51593/20200053
    [Crossref]
  117. 117.
    Chiang H-C, Chang M-H, Kao E. 2021. Taiwan approves AI-based detection system for COVID-19. Focus Taiwan (CNA English News) May 30. https://focustaiwan.tw/sci-tech/202105300011
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-110220-012203
Loading
Deep Learning and Medical Image Analysis for COVID-19 Diagnosis and Prediction
Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 24, 179 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-110220-012203
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-110220-012203
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-110220-012203
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error