1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Biophysics
  4. Volume 46, 2017
  5. Article

Annual Review of Biophysics

Volume 46, 2017

Rate Constants and Mechanisms of Protein–Ligand Binding

Abstract

Whereas protein–ligand binding affinities have long-established prominence, binding rate constants and binding mechanisms have gained increasing attention in recent years. Both new computational methods and new experimental techniques have been developed to characterize the latter properties. It is now realized that binding mechanisms, like binding rate constants, can and should be quantitatively determined. In this review, we summarize studies and synthesize ideas on several topics in the hope of providing a coherent picture of and physical insight into binding kinetics. The topics include microscopic formulation of the kinetic problem and its reduction to simple rate equations; computation of binding rate constants; quantitative determination of binding mechanisms; and elucidation of physical factors that control binding rate constants and mechanisms.

Keyword(s): binding mechanism, binding rate constant, conformational selection, dock and coalesce, induced fit, reactive flux
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033639
2017-05-22
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/biophys/46/1/annurev-biophys-070816-033639.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033639&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adam G, Delbruck M. 1.  1968. Reduction of dimensionality in biological diffusion processes. Structural Chemistry and Molecular Biology N Davidson 198–215 San Francisco: W.H. Freeman [Google Scholar]
  2. Alsallaq R, Zhou H-X. 2.  2008. Electrostatic rate enhancement and transient complex of protein–protein association. Proteins 71:320–35 [Google Scholar]
  3. Berezhkovskii AM, Szabo A, Greives N, Zhou H-X. 3.  2014. Multidimensional reaction rate theory with anisotropic diffusion. J. Chem. Phys. 141:204106 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernat B, Sun M, Dwyer M, Feldkamp M, Kossiakoff AA. 4.  2004. Dissecting the binding energy epitope of a high-affinity variant of human growth hormone: cooperative and additive effects from combining mutations from independently selected phage display mutagenesis libraries. Biochemistry 43:6076–84 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bohnuud T, Kozakov D, Vajda S. 5.  2014. Evidence of conformational selection driving the formation of ligand binding sites in protein-protein interfaces. PLOS Comput. Biol. 10:e1003872 [Google Scholar]
  6. Buch I, Giorgino T, De Fabritiis G. 6.  2011. Complete reconstruction of an enzyme-inhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations. PNAS 108:10184–89 [Google Scholar]
  7. Burgen AS. 7.  1981. Conformational changes and drug action. Fed. Proc 402723–28 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cai L, Zhou H-X. 8.  2011. Theory and simulation on the kinetics of protein–ligand binding coupled to conformational change. J. Chem. Phys. 134:105101 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chakrabarti KS, Agafonov RV, Pontiggia F, Otten R, Higgins MK. 9.  et al. 2016. Conformational selection in a protein-protein interaction revealed by dynamic pathway analysis. Cell Rep 14:32–42 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chang C-E, Shen T, Trylska J, Tozzini V, McCammon JA. 10.  2006. Gated binding of ligands to HIV-1 protease: Brownian dynamics simulations in a coarse-grained model. Biophys. J. 90:3880–85 [Google Scholar]
  11. Changeux J-P, Edelstein S. 11.  2011. Conformational selection or induced fit? 50 years of debate resolved. F1000 Biol. Rep. 3:19 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chodera JD, Noe F. 12.  2014. Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 25:135–44 [Google Scholar]
  13. Clore GM. 13.  2014. Interplay between conformational selection and induced fit in multidomain protein-ligand binding probed by paramagnetic relaxation enhancement. Biophys. Chem. 186:3–12 [Google Scholar]
  14. Daniels KG, Suo Y, Oas TG. 14.  2015. Conformational kinetics reveals affinities of protein conformational states. PNAS 112:9352–57 [Google Scholar]
  15. Daniels KG, Tonthat NK, McClure DR, Chang Y-C, Liu X. 15.  et al. 2014. Ligand concentration regulates the pathways of coupled protein folding and binding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136:822–25 [Google Scholar]
  16. Darling RJ, Kuchibhotla U, Glaesner W, Micanovic R, Witcher DR, Beals JM. 16.  2002. Glycosylation of erythropoietin affects receptor binding kinetics: role of electrostatic interactions. Biochemistry 41:14524–31 [Google Scholar]
  17. Debye P. 17.  1942. Reaction rate in ionic solutions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 82:265–72 [Google Scholar]
  18. DeVore MS, Braimah A, Benson DR, Johnson CK. 18.  2016. Single-molecule FRET states, conformational interchange, and conformational selection by dye labels in calmodulin. J. Phys. Chem. B 120:4357–64 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dogan J, Gianni S, Jemth P. 19.  2014. The binding mechanisms of intrinsically disordered proteins. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16:6323–31 [Google Scholar]
  20. E W, Vanden-Eijnden E. 20.  2006. Towards a theory of transition paths. J. Stat. Phys. 123:503–23 [Google Scholar]
  21. Faradjian AK, Elber R. 21.  2004. Computing time scales from reaction coordinates by milestoning. J. Chem. Phys. 120:10880–89 [Google Scholar]
  22. Formaneck MS, Ma L, Cui Q. 22.  2006. Reconciling the “old” and “new” views of protein allostery: a molecular simulation study of chemotaxis Y protein (CheY). Proteins 63:846–67 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gabdoulline RR, Wade RC. 23.  1997. Simulation of the diffusional association of barnase and barstar. Biophys. J. 72:1917–29 [Google Scholar]
  24. Galburt EA, Rammohan J. 24.  2016. A kinetic signature for parallel pathways: conformational selection and induced fit. Links and disconnects between observed relaxation rates and fractional equilibrium flux under pseudo-first-order conditions. Biochemistry 55:7014–22 [Google Scholar]
  25. Getzoff ED, Cabelli DE, Fisher CL, Parge HE, Viezzoli MS. 25.  et al. 1992. Faster superoxide dismutase mutants designed by enhancing electrostatic guidance. Nature 358:347–51 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gianni S, Dogan J, Jemth P. 26.  2014. Distinguishing induced fit from conformational selection. Biophys. Chem. 189:33–39 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gorfe AA, Chang C-E, Ivanov I, McCammon JA. 27.  2008. Dynamics of the acetylcholinesterase tetramer. Biophys. J. 94:1144–54 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gracia B, Xue Y, Bisaria N, Herschlag D, Al-Hashimi HM, Russell R. 28.  2016. RNA structural modules control the rate and pathway of RNA folding and assembly. J. Mol. Biol. 20:3972–85 [Google Scholar]
  29. Greives N, Zhou H-X. 29.  2012. BDflex: a method for efficient treatment of molecular flexibility in calculating protein-ligand binding rate constants from Brownian dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 137:135105 [Google Scholar]
  30. Greives N, Zhou H-X. 30.  2014. Both protein dynamics and ligand concentration can shift the binding mechanism between conformational selection and induced fit. PNAS 111:10197–202 [Google Scholar]
  31. Grinstead CM, Snell JL. 31.  2012. Introduction to Probability. Providence, RI: Am. Math. Soc. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gu S, Silva D-A, Meng L, Yue A, Huang XH. 32.  2014. Quantitatively characterizing the ligand binding mechanisms of choline binding protein using Markov state model analysis. PLOS Comput. Biol. 10:e1003767 [Google Scholar]
  33. Guo J, Zhou H-X. 33.  2016. Allosteric activation of SENP1 by SUMO1 β-grasp domain involves a dock-and-coalesce mechanism. eLife 5:e18249 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hammes GG, Chang Y-C, Oas TG. 34.  2009. Conformational selection or induced fit: a flux description of reaction mechanism. PNAS 106:13737–41 [Google Scholar]
  35. Held M, Metzner P, Prinz JH, Noe F. 35.  2011. Mechanisms of protein-ligand association and its modulation by protein mutations. Biophys. J. 100:701–10 [Google Scholar]
  36. Huang HC, Briggs JM. 36.  2002. The association between a negatively charged ligand and the electronegative binding pocket of its receptor. Biopolymers 63:247–60 [Google Scholar]
  37. Jomain JB, Tallet E, Broutin I, Hoos S, van Agthoven J. 37.  et al. 2007. Structural and thermodynamic bases for the design of pure prolactin receptor antagonists: X-ray structure of Del1-9-G129R-hPRL. J. Biol. Chem. 282:33118–31 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kiefhaber T, Bachmann A, Jensen KS. 38.  2012. Dynamics and mechanisms of coupled protein folding and binding reactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 22:21–29 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kim E, Lee S, Jeon A, Choi JM, Lee H-S. 39.  et al. 2013. A single-molecule dissection of ligand binding to a protein with intrinsic dynamics. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9:313–18 [Google Scholar]
  40. Koh CY, Kim JE, Shibata S, Ranade RM, Yu M. 40.  et al. 2012. Distinct states of methionyl-tRNA synthetase indicate inhibitor binding by conformational selection. Structure 20:1681–91 [Google Scholar]
  41. Koshland DE. 41.  1958. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. PNAS 44:98–104 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kurisaki I, Takayanagi M, Nagaoka M. 42.  2014. Combined mechanism of conformational selection and induced fit in U1A–RNA molecular recognition. Biochemistry 53:3646–57 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lin Y-L, Meng YL, Jiang W, Roux B. 43.  2013. Explaining why Gleevec is a specific and potent inhibitor of Abl kinase. PNAS 110:1664–69 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lu H, Tonge PJ. 44.  2010. Drug-target residence time: critical information for lead optimization. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 14:467–74 [Google Scholar]
  45. Luty BA, El Amrani S, McCammon JA. 45.  1993. Simulation of the bimolecular reaction between superoxide and superoxide dismutase: synthesis of the encounter and reaction steps. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115:11874–77 [Google Scholar]
  46. Luty BA, McCammon JA. 46.  1993. Simulation of bimolecular reactions: synthesis of the encounter and reaction steps. Mol. Simul. 10:61–65 [Google Scholar]
  47. Luty BA, McCammon JA, Zhou H-X. 47.  1992. Diffusive reaction rates from Brownian dynamics simulations: replacing the outer cutoff surface by an analytical treatment. J. Chem. Phys. 97:5682–86 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ma B, Kumar S, Tsai C-J, Nussinov R. 48.  1999. Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. Protein Eng 12:713–20 [Google Scholar]
  49. Majek P, Elber R. 49.  2010. Milestoning without a reaction coordinate. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 6:1805–17 [Google Scholar]
  50. Maragliano L, Fischer A, Vanden-Eijnden E, Ciccotti G. 50.  2006. String method in collective variables: minimum free energy paths and isocommittor surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 125:24106 [Google Scholar]
  51. McCammon JA, Northrup SH. 51.  1981. Gated binding of ligands to proteins. Nature 293:316–17 [Google Scholar]
  52. Metzner P, Schutte C, Vanden-Eijnden E. 52.  2009. Transition path theory for Markov jump processes. Multiscale Model. Simul. 7:1192–219 [Google Scholar]
  53. Meyer-Almes FJ. 53.  2016. Discrimination between conformational selection and induced fit protein–ligand binding using Integrated Global Fit analysis. Eur. Biophys. J. 45:245–57 [Google Scholar]
  54. Noe F, Schutte C, Vanden-Eijnden E, Reich L, Weikl TR. 54.  2009. Constructing the equilibrium ensemble of folding pathways from short off-equilibrium simulations. PNAS 106:19011–16 [Google Scholar]
  55. Northrup SH, Allison SA, McCammon JA. 55.  1984. Brownian dynamics simulation of diffusion-influenced bimolecular reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 80:1517–24 [Google Scholar]
  56. Northrup SH, Boles JO, Reynolds JC. 56.  1988. Brownian dynamics of cytochrome c and cytochrome c peroxidase association. Science 241:67–70 [Google Scholar]
  57. Pang X, Qin S, Zhou H-X. 57.  2011. Rationalizing 5000-fold differences in receptor-binding rate constants of four cytokines. Biophys. J. 101:1175–83 [Google Scholar]
  58. Pang X, Zhou H-X. 58.  2016. Mechanism and rate constants of the Cdc42 GTPase binding with intrinsically disordered effectors. Proteins 84:674–85 [Google Scholar]
  59. Pang X, Zhou KH, Qin S, Zhou H-X. 59.  2012. Prediction and dissection of widely-varying association rate constants of actin-binding proteins. PLOS Comput. Biol. 8:e1002696 [Google Scholar]
  60. Paul F, Weikl TR. 60.  2016. How to distinguish conformational selection and induced fit based on chemical relaxation rates. PLOS Comput. Biol. 12:e1005067 [Google Scholar]
  61. Peters GH, Olsen OH, Svendsen A, Wade RC. 61.  1996. Theoretical investigation of the dynamics of the active site lid in Rhizomucor miehei lipase. Biophys. J. 71:119–29 [Google Scholar]
  62. Plattner N, Noe F. 62.  2015. Protein conformational plasticity and complex ligand-binding kinetics explored by atomistic simulations and Markov models. Nat. Commun. 6:7653 [Google Scholar]
  63. Qin S, Pang X, Zhou H-X. 63.  2011. Automated prediction of protein association rate constants. Structure 19:1744–51 [Google Scholar]
  64. Qin S, Zhou H-X. 64.  2009. Dissection of the high rate constant for the binding of a ribotoxin to the ribosome. PNAS 106:6974–79 [Google Scholar]
  65. Rogers JM, Oleinikovas V, Shammas SL, Wong CT, De Sancho D. 65.  et al. 2014. Interplay between partner and ligand facilitates the folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein. PNAS 111:15420–25 [Google Scholar]
  66. Romanowska J, Kokh DB, Fuller JC, Wade RC. 66.  2015. Computational approaches for studying drug binding kinetics. Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Drug Binding 65 GM Keserü, DC Swinney 211–35 Weinheim, Ger.: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA [Google Scholar]
  67. Satpati P, Simonson T. 67.  2012. Conformational selection through electrostatics: free energy simulations of GTP and GDP binding to archaeal initiation factor 2. Proteins 80:1264–82 [Google Scholar]
  68. Schneider EV, Böttcher J, Huber R, Maskos K, Neumann L. 68.  2013. Structure–kinetic relationship study of CDK8/CycC specific compounds. PNAS 110:8081–86 [Google Scholar]
  69. Schreiber G, Haran G, Zhou H-X. 69.  2009. Fundamental aspects of protein–protein association kinetics. Chem. Rev. 109:839–60 [Google Scholar]
  70. Shan YB, Kim ET, Eastwood MP, Dror RO, Seeliger MA, Shaw DE. 70.  2011. How does a drug molecule find its target binding site?. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133:9181–83 [Google Scholar]
  71. Sines JJ, Allison SA, McCammon JA. 71.  1990. Point-charge distributions and electrostatic steering in enzyme substrate encounter: Brownian dynamics of modified copper-zinc superoxide dismutases. Biochemistry 29:9403–12 [Google Scholar]
  72. Smoluchowski MV. 72.  1917. Versuch einer mathematischen Theorie der Koagulationskinetik kolloider Lösungen. Z. Phys. Chem. 92:129–68 [Google Scholar]
  73. Steiner S, Caflisch A. 73.  2012. Peptide binding to the PDZ3 domain by conformational selection. Proteins 80:2562–72 [Google Scholar]
  74. Suddala KC, Wang J, Hou Q, Water NG. 74.  2015. Mg2+ shifts ligand-mediated folding of a riboswitch from induced-fit to conformational selection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137:14075–83 [Google Scholar]
  75. Sullivan SM, Holyoak T. 75.  2008. Enzymes with lid-gated active sites must operate by an induced fit mechanism instead of conformational selection. PNAS 105:13829–34 [Google Scholar]
  76. Swift RV, McCammon JA. 76.  2009. Substrate induced population shifts and stochastic gating in the PBCV-1 mRNA capping enzyme. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131:5126–33 [Google Scholar]
  77. Szabo A. 77.  1989. Theory of diffusion-influenced fluorescence quenching. J. Phys. Chem. 93:6929–39 [Google Scholar]
  78. Szabo A, Shoup D, Northrup SH, McCammon JA. 78.  1982. Stochastically gated diffusion-influenced reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 77:4484–93 [Google Scholar]
  79. Tan RC, Truong TN, McCammon JA, Sussman JL. 79.  1993. Acetylcholinesterase: electrostatic steering increases the rate of ligand binding. Biochemistry 32:401–3 [Google Scholar]
  80. Tsai C-J, Liu S, Hung C-L, Jhong S-R, Sung T-C, Chiang Y-W. 80.  2015. BAX-induced apoptosis can be initiated through a conformational selection mechanism. Structure 23:139–48 [Google Scholar]
  81. Vanden-Eijnden E, Venturoli M. 81.  2009. Markovian milestoning with Voronoi tessellations. J. Chem. Phys. 130:194101 [Google Scholar]
  82. Vogt AD, Di Cera E. 82.  2013. Conformational selection is a dominant mechanism of ligand binding. Biochemistry 52:5723–29 [Google Scholar]
  83. Votapka LW, Amaro RE. 83.  2015. Multiscale estimation of binding kinetics using Brownian dynamics, molecular dynamics and milestoning. PLOS Comput. Biol. 11:e1004381 [Google Scholar]
  84. Wade RC, Davis ME, Luty BA, Madura JD, McCammon JA. 84.  1993. Gating of the active site of triose phosphate isomerase: Brownian dynamics simulations of flexible peptide loops in the enzyme. Biophys. J. 64:9–15 [Google Scholar]
  85. Wade RC, Gabdoulline RR, Ludemann SK, Lounnas V. 85.  1998. Electrostatic steering and ionic tethering in enzyme-ligand binding: insights from simulations. PNAS 95:5942–49 [Google Scholar]
  86. Wade RC, Luty BA, Demchuk E, Madura JD, Davis ME. 86.  et al. 1994. Simulation of enzyme-substrate encounter with gated active sites. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1:65–69 [Google Scholar]
  87. Wang W, Ye W, Yu Q, Jiang C, Zhang J. 87.  et al. 2013. Conformational selection and induced fit in specific antibody and antigen recognition: SPE7 as a case study. J. Phys. Chem. B 117:4912–23 [Google Scholar]
  88. Wang Y, Shen B-J, Sebald W. 88.  1997. A mixed-charge pair in human interleukin 4 dominates high-affinity interaction with the receptor alpha chain. PNAS 94:1657–62 [Google Scholar]
  89. Whittier SK, Hengge AC, Loria JP. 89.  2013. Conformational motions regulate phosphoryl transfer in related protein tyrosine phosphatases. Science 341:899–903 [Google Scholar]
  90. Wlodek ST, Antosiewicz J, Briggs JM. 90.  1997. On the mechanism of acetylcholinesterase action: the electrostatically induced acceleration of the catalytic acylation step. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119:8159–65 [Google Scholar]
  91. Wu H, Paul F, Wehmeyer C, Noe F. 91.  2016. Multiensemble Markov models of molecular thermodynamics and kinetics. PNAS 113:E3221–30 [Google Scholar]
  92. Ye L, Van Eps N, Zimmer M, Ernst OP, Prosser RS. 92.  2016. Activation of the A2A adenosine G-protein-coupled receptor by conformational selection. Nature 533:265–68 [Google Scholar]
  93. Yu T-Q, Lapelosa M, Vanden-Eijnden E, Abrams CF. 93.  2015. Full kinetics of CO entry, internal diffusion, and exit in myoglobin from transition-path theory simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137:3041–50 [Google Scholar]
  94. Yu X, Martinez M, Gable AL, Fuller JC, Bruce NJ. 94.  et al. 2015. webSDA: a web server to simulate macromolecular diffusional association. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W220–24 [Google Scholar]
  95. Zhou H-X. 95.  1990. Kinetics of diffusion-influenced reactions studied by Brownian dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. 94:8794–800 [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhou H-X. 96.  1990. On the calculation of diffusive reaction rates using Brownian dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 92:3092–95 [Google Scholar]
  97. Zhou H-X. 97.  1993. Brownian dynamics study of the influences of electrostatic interaction and diffusion on protein-protein association kinetics. Biophys. J. 64:1711–26 [Google Scholar]
  98. Zhou H-X. 98.  1996. Effect of interaction potentials in diffusion-influenced reactions with small reactive regions. J. Chem. Phys. 105:7235–37 [Google Scholar]
  99. Zhou H-X. 99.  1997. Enhancement of protein-protein association rate by interaction potential: accuracy of prediction based on local Boltzmann factor. Biophys. J. 73:2441–45 [Google Scholar]
  100. Zhou H-X. 100.  2010. From induced fit to conformational selection: a continuum of binding mechanism controlled by the timescale of conformational transitions. Biophys. J. 98:L15–17 [Google Scholar]
  101. Zhou H-X. 101.  2010. Rate theories for biologists. Q. Rev. Biophys. 43:219–93 [Google Scholar]
  102. Zhou H-X. 102.  2011. Rapid search for specific sites on DNA through conformational switch of nonspecifically bound proteins. PNAS 108:8651–56 [Google Scholar]
  103. Zhou H-X. 103.  2012. Intrinsic disorder: signaling via highly specific but short-lived association. Trends Biochem. Sci. 37:43–48 [Google Scholar]
  104. Zhou H-X, Briggs JM, McCammon JA. 104.  1996. A 240-fold electrostatic rate enhancement for acetylcholinesterase-substrate binding can be predicted by the potential within the active site. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118:13069–70 [Google Scholar]
  105. Zhou H-X, Pang X, Lu C. 105.  2012. Rate constants and mechanisms of intrinsically disordered proteins binding to structured targets. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14:10466–76 [Google Scholar]
  106. Zhou H-X, Szabo A. 106.  1996. Theory and simulation of stochastically-gated diffusion-influenced reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 100:2597–604 [Google Scholar]
  107. Zhou H-X, Szabo A. 107.  1996. Theory and simulation of the time-dependent rate coefficients of diffusion-influenced reactions. Biophys. J. 71:2440–57 [Google Scholar]
  108. Zhou H-X, Szabo A. 108.  2004. Enhancement of association rates by nonspecific binding to DNA and cell membranes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:178101 [Google Scholar]
  109. Zhou H-X, Wlodek ST, McCammon JA. 109.  1998. Conformation gating as a mechanism for enzyme specificity. PNAS 95:9280–83 [Google Scholar]
  110. Zhou H-X, Wong K-Y, Vijayakumar M. 110.  1997. Design of fast enzymes by optimizing interaction potential in active site. PNAS 94:12372–77 [Google Scholar]
  111. Zuckerman DM, Chong LT. 111.  2017. Weighted ensemble simulation: review of methodology, applications, and software. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 46:43–57 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033639
Loading
Rate Constants and Mechanisms of Protein–Ligand Binding
Annual Review of Biophysics 46, 105 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033639
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033639
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033639
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error