1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
  4. Volume 5, 2014
  5. Article

Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

Volume 5, 2014

Energy Supply Chain Optimization of Hybrid Feedstock Processes: A Review

Abstract

The economic, environmental, and social performances of energy systems depend on their geographical locations and the surrounding market infrastructure for feedstocks and energy products. Strategic decisions to locate energy conversion facilities must take all upstream and downstream operations into account, prompting the development of supply chain modeling and optimization methods. This article reviews the contributions of energy supply chain studies that include heat, power, and liquid fuels production. Studies are categorized based on specific features of the mathematical model, highlighting those that address energy supply chain models with and without considerations of multiperiod decisions. Studies that incorporate uncertainties are discussed, and opportunities for future research developments are outlined.

Keyword(s): biomass, coal, heat, liquid fuels, natural gas, power
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040425
2014-06-07
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/chembioeng/5/1/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040425.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040425&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. US Energy Inf. Adm 2013. Annual Energy Outlook 2013 with Projections to 2040. Document Number: DOE/EIA-0383(2013). Washington, DC: Energy Inf. Adm http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2013).pdf
  2. Lynd LR, Larson E, Greene N, Laser M, Sheehan J. 2.  et al. 2009. The role of biomass in America's energy future: framing the analysis. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 3:113–23 [Google Scholar]
  3. Natl. Acad. Sci., Natl. Acad. Eng., Natl. Res. Counc 2009. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Issues. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  4. US Dep. Energy 2005. Biomass as Feedstock for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply. Document Number: DOE/GO-102005–2135. Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/publications.html
  5. Floudas CA, Elia JA, Baliban RC. 5.  2012. Hybrid and single feedstock energy processes for liquid transportation fuels: a critical review. Comp. Chem. Eng. 41:24–51 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baliban RC, Elia JA, Floudas CA. 6.  2011. Optimization framework for the simultaneous process synthesis, heat and power integration of a thermochemical hybrid biomass, coal, and natural gas facility. Comp. Chem. Eng. 35:1647–90 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baliban RC, Elia JA, Floudas CA. 7.  2012. Simultaneous process synthesis, heat, power, and water integration of thermochemical hybrid biomass, coal, and natural gas facilities. Comp. Chem. Eng. 37:297–327 [Google Scholar]
  8. Baliban RC, Elia JA, Misener R, Floudas CA. 8.  2012. Global optimization of a MINLP process synthesis model for thermochemical based conversion of hybrid coal, biomass, and natural gas to liquid fuels. Comp. Chem. Eng. 42:64–86 [Google Scholar]
  9. Baliban RC, Elia JA, Weekman VW, Floudas CA. 9.  2012. Process synthesis of hybrid coal, biomass, and natural gas to liquids via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, ZSM-5 catalytic conversion, methanol synthesis, methanol-to-gasoline, and methanol-to-olefins/distillate technologies. Comp. Chem. Eng. 47:29–56 [Google Scholar]
  10. Baliban RC, Elia JA, Floudas CA. 10.  2013. Novel natural gas to liquids (GTL) technologies: process synthesis and global optimization strategies. AIChE J. 59:505–31 [Google Scholar]
  11. Baliban RC, Elia JA, Floudas CA. 11.  2013. Biomass and natural gas to liquid transportation fuels: process synthesis, global optimization, and topology analysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52:3381–406 [Google Scholar]
  12. Baliban RC, Elia JA, Floudas CA. 12.  2013. Biomass to liquid transportation fuels (BTL) systems: process synthesis and global optimization framework. Energy Environ. Sci. 6:267–87 [Google Scholar]
  13. Baliban RC, Elia JA, Floudas CA, Gurau B, Weingarten MB, Klotz SD. 13.  2013. Hardwood biomass to gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel: 1. Process synthesis and global optimization of a thermochemical refinery. Energy Fuels 27:4302–24 [Google Scholar]
  14. Baliban RC, Elia JA, Floudas CA, Xiao X, Zhang Z. 14.  et al. 2013. Thermochemical conversion of duckweed biomass to gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel: process synthesis and global optimization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52:11436–50 [Google Scholar]
  15. Martín M, Grossmann IE. 15.  2011. Process optimization of FT-diesel production from lignocellulosic switchgrass. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50:13485–99 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellepola J, Thijssen N, Grievink J, Baak G, Avhale A, van Schijndel J. 16.  2012. Development of a synthesis tool for Gas-To-Liquid complexes. Comp. Chem. Eng. 42:2–14 [Google Scholar]
  17. Yue D, Kim MA, You F. 17.  2013. Design of sustainable product systems and supply chains with life cycle optimization based on functional unit: general modelling framework, mixed-integer nonlinear programming algorithms and case study on hydrocarbon biofuels. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 1:1003–14 [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang B, Gebreslassie BH, You F. 18.  2013. Sustainable design and synthesis of hydrocarbon biorefinery via gasification pathway: integrated life cycle assessment and technoeconomic analysis with multiobjective superstructure optimization. Comp. Chem. Eng. 52:55–76 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gebreslassie BH, Waymire R, You F. 19.  2013. Sustainable design and synthesis of algae-based biorefinery for simultaneous hydrocarbon biofuel production and carbon sequestration. AIChE J. 59:1599–621 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gebreslassie BH, Slivinsky M, Wang B, You F. 20.  2013. Life cycle optimization for sustainable design and operations of hydrocarbon biorefinery via fast pyrolysis, hydrotreating and hydrocracking. Comp. Chem. Eng. 50:71–91 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kokossis AC, Yang A. 21.  2010. On the use of systems technologies and a systematic approach for the synthesis and the design of future biorefineries. Comp. Chem. Eng. 34:1397–405 [Google Scholar]
  22. Daoutidis P, Marvin WA, Rangarajan S, Torres AI. 22.  2013. Engineering biomass conversion processes: a systems perspective. AIChE J. 59:3–18 [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu P, Georgiadis MC, Pistikopoulos EN. 23.  2011. Advances in energy systems engineering. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50:4915–26 [Google Scholar]
  24. Elia JA, Baliban RC, Xiao X, Floudas CA. 24.  2011. Optimal energy supply network determination and life cycle analysis for hybrid coal, biomass, and natural gas to liquid (CBGTL) plants using carbon-based hydrogen production. Comp. Chem. Eng. 35:1399–430 [Google Scholar]
  25. Elia JA, Baliban RC, Floudas CA. 25.  2012. Nationwide supply chain analysis for hybrid energy processes with significant CO2 emissions reduction. AIChE J. 58:2142–54 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gold S. 26.  2011. Bio-energy supply chains and stakeholders. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 16:439–62 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gold S, Seuring S. 27.  2011. Supply chain and logistics issues of bio-energy production. J. Clean. Prod. 19:32–42 [Google Scholar]
  28. An H, Wilhelm WE, Searcy SW. 28.  2011. Biofuel and petroleum-based fuel supply chain research: a literature review. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3763–74 [Google Scholar]
  29. Iakovou E, Karagiannidis A, Vlachos D, Toka A, Malamakis A. 29.  2010. Waste biomass-to-energy supply chain management: a critical synthesis. Waste Manag. 30:1860–70 [Google Scholar]
  30. Scott JA, Ho W, Dey PK. 30.  2012. A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for bioenergy systems. Energy 42:146–56 [Google Scholar]
  31. Nikolopoulou A, Ierapetritou MG. 31.  2012. Optimal design of sustainable chemical processes and supply chains: a review. Comp. Chem. Eng. 44:94–103 [Google Scholar]
  32. Awudu I, Zhang J. 32.  2012. Uncertainties and sustainability concepts in biofuel supply chain management: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16:1359–68 [Google Scholar]
  33. Sharma B, Ingalls RG, Jones CL, Kanchi A. 33.  2013. Biomass supply chain design and analysis: basis, overview, modeling, challenges, and future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 24:608–27 [Google Scholar]
  34. Shabani N, Akhtari S, Sowlati T. 34.  2013. Value chain optimization of forest biomass for bioenergy production: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 23:299–311 [Google Scholar]
  35. Tatsiopoulos IP, Tolis AJ. 35.  2003. Economic aspects of the cotton-stalk biomass logistics and comparison of supply chain methods. Biomass Bioenergy 24:199–214 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kumar A, Sokhansanj S, Flynn PC. 36.  2006. Development of a multicriteria assessment model for ranking biomass feedstock collection and transportation systems. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 129–32:71–87 [Google Scholar]
  37. Aksoy B, Cullinan HT, Sammons NE Jr, Eden MR. 37.  2008. Identification of optimal poultry litter biorefinery location in Alabama through minimization of feedstock transportation cost. Environ. Prog. 27:515–23 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ravula PP, Grisso RD, Cundiff JS. 38.  2008. Cotton logistics as a model for a biomass transportation system. Biomass Bioenergy 32:314–25 [Google Scholar]
  39. Panichelli L, Gnansounou E. 39.  2008. GIS-based approach for defining bioenergy facilities location: a case study in Northern Spain based on marginal delivery costs and resources competition between facilities. Biomass Bioenergy 32:289–300 [Google Scholar]
  40. Uslu A, Faaij APC, Bergman PCA. 40.  2008. Pre-treatment technologies, and their effect on international bioenergy supply chain logistics. Techno-economic evaluation of torrefaction, fast pyrolysis and pelletisation. Energy 33:1206–23 [Google Scholar]
  41. Cundiff JS, Fike JH, Parrish DJ, Alwang J. 41.  2009. Logistic constraints in developing dedicated large-scale bioenergy systems in the southeastern United States. J. Environ. Eng. 135:1086–96 [Google Scholar]
  42. Leduc S, Schmid E, Obersteiner M, Riahi K. 42.  2009. Methanol production by gasification using a geographically explicit model. Biomass Bioenergy 33:745–51 [Google Scholar]
  43. Yu Y, Bartle J, Li CZ, Wu H. 43.  2009. Mallee biomass as a key bioenergy source in Western Australia: importance of biomass supply chain. Energy Fuels 23:3290–99 [Google Scholar]
  44. Charlton A, Elias R, Fish S, Fowler P, Gallagher J. 44.  2009. The biorefining opportunities in Wales: understanding the scope for building a sustainable, biorenewable economy using plant biomass. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 87:1147–61 [Google Scholar]
  45. Marti BV, Gonzalez EF. 45.  2010. Mathematical algorithms to locate factories to transform biomass in bioenergy focused on logistic network construction. Renew. Energy 35:2136–42 [Google Scholar]
  46. Windisch J, Sikanen L, Röser D, Gritten D. 46.  2010. Supply chain management applications for forest fuel procurement—cost or benefit?. Silva Fennica 44:845–58 [Google Scholar]
  47. Meehan PG, McDonnell KP. 47.  2010. An assessment of biomass feedstock availability for the supply of bioenergy to University College Dublin. Biomass Bioenergy 34:1757–63 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sultana A, Kumar A. 48.  2011. Optimal configuration and combination of multiple lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks delivery to a biorefinery. Bioresour. Technol. 102:9947–56 [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang F, Johnson DM, Sutherland JW. 49.  2011. A GIS-based method for identifying the optimal location for a facility to convert forest biomass to biofuel. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3951–61 [Google Scholar]
  50. Leboreiro J, Hilaly AK. 50.  2011. Biomass transportation model and optimum plant size for the production of ethanol. Bioresour. Technol. 102:2712–23 [Google Scholar]
  51. Tyndall JC, Schulte LA, Hall RB, Grubh KR. 51.  2011. Woody biomass in the U.S. Cornbelt? Constraints and opportunities in the supply. Biomass Bioenergy 35:1561–71 [Google Scholar]
  52. Gonzalez R, Phillips R, Saloni D, Jameel H, Abt R. 52.  et al. 2011. Biomass to energy in the southern United States: supply chain and delivered cost. BioResources 6:2954–76 [Google Scholar]
  53. Hacatoglu K, McLellan PJ, Layzell DB. 53.  2011. Feasibility study of a Great Lakes bioenergy system. Bioresour. Technol. 102:1087–94 [Google Scholar]
  54. Thanarak P. 54.  2012. Supply chain management of agricultural waste for biomass utilization and CO2 emission reduction in the lower northern region of Thailand. Energy Procedia 14:843–48 [Google Scholar]
  55. Vimmerstedt LJ, Bush B, Peterson S. 55.  2012. Ethanol distribution, dispensing, and use: analysis of a portion of the biomass-to-biofuels supply chain using system dynamics. PLoS ONE 7:e35082 [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang FL, Johnson DM, Johnson MA. 56.  2012. Development of a simulation model of biomass supply chain for biofuel production. Renew. Energy 44:380–91 [Google Scholar]
  57. Sacchelli S, Fagarazzi C, Bernetti I. 57.  2013. Economic evaluation of forest biomass production in central Italy: a scenario assessment based on spatial analysis tool. Biomass Bioenergy 53:1–10 [Google Scholar]
  58. Grisso RD, McCullough D, Cundiff JS, Judd JD. 58.  2013. Harvest schedule to fill storage for year-round delivery of grasses to biorefinery. Biomass Bioenergy 55:331–38 [Google Scholar]
  59. Odeh NA, Cockerill TT. 59.  2008. Life cycle GHG assessment of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy 36:367–80 [Google Scholar]
  60. Koornneef J, van Keulen T, Faaij A, Turkenburg W. 60.  2008. Life cycle assessment of a pulverized coal power plant with post-combustion capture, transport and storage of CO2. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2:448–67 [Google Scholar]
  61. Slade R, Bauen A, Shah N. 61.  2009. The greenhouse gas emissions performance of cellulosic ethanol supply chains in Europe. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2:15–33 [Google Scholar]
  62. Smeets EMW, Lewandowski IM, Faaij APC. 62.  2009. The economical and environmental performance of miscanthus and switchgrass production and supply chains in a European setting. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13:1230–45 [Google Scholar]
  63. Jaramillo P, Samaras C, Wakeley H, Meisterling K. 63.  2009. Greenhouse gas implications of using coal for transportation: life cycle assessment of coal-to-liquids, plug-in hybrids, and hydrogen pathways. Energy Policy 37:2689–95 [Google Scholar]
  64. Nasiri F, Zaccour G. 64.  2009. An exploratory game-theoretic analysis of biomass electricity generation supply chain. Energy Policy 37:4514–22 [Google Scholar]
  65. Wu H, Yu Y, Yip K. 65.  2010. Bioslurry as a fuel. 1. Viability of a bioslurry-based bioenergy supply chain for mallee biomass in Western Australia. Energy Fuels 24:5652–59 [Google Scholar]
  66. Yu Y, Wu H. 66.  2010. Bioslurry as a fuel. 2. Life-cycle energy and carbon footprints of bioslurry fuels from mallee biomass in Western Australia. Energy Fuels 24:5660–68 [Google Scholar]
  67. Choo YM, Muhamad H, Hashim Z, Subramaniam V, Puah CW, Tan YA. 67.  2011. Determination of GHG contributions by subsystems in the oil palm supply chain using the LCA approach. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 16:669–81 [Google Scholar]
  68. Valente C, Hillring BG, Solberg B. 68.  2011. Bioenergy from mountain forest: a life cycle assessment of the Norwegian woody biomass supply chain. Scand. J. Forest Res. 26:429–36 [Google Scholar]
  69. Tahvanainen T, Anttila P. 69.  2011. Supply chain cost analysis of long-distance transportation of energy wood in Finland. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3360–75 [Google Scholar]
  70. Chiueh PT, Lee KC, Syu FS, Lo SL. 70.  2012. Implications of biomass pretreatment to cost and carbon emissions: case study of rice straw and Pennisetum in Taiwan. Bioresour. Technol. 108:285–94 [Google Scholar]
  71. Svanberg M, Olofsson I, Flodén J, Nordin A. 71.  2013. Analysing biomass torrefaction supply chain costs. Bioresour. Technol. 142:287–96 [Google Scholar]
  72. den Herder M, Kolström M, Lindner M, Suominen T, Tuomasjukka D, Pekkanen M. 72.  2012. Sustainability impact assessment on the production and use of different wood and fossil fuels employed for energy production in North Karelia, Finland. Energies 5:4870–91 [Google Scholar]
  73. Godard C, Boissy J, Gabrielle B. 73.  2013. Life-cycle assessment of local feedstock supply scenarios to compare candidate biomass sources. GCB Bioenergy 5:16–29 [Google Scholar]
  74. Parish ES, Kline KL, Dale VH, Efroymson RA, McBride AC. 74.  et al. 2013. Comparing scales of environmental effects from gasoline and ethanol production. Environ. Manag. 51:307–38 [Google Scholar]
  75. Jäppinen E, Korpinen OJ, Ranta T. 75.  2013. The effects of local biomass availability and possibilities for truck and train transportation on the greenhouse gas emissions of a small-diameter energy wood supply chain. Bioenergy Res. 6:166–77 [Google Scholar]
  76. Clark CM, Lin Y, Bierwagen BG, Eaton LM, Langholtz MH. 76.  et al. 2013. Growing a sustainable biofuels industry: economics, environmental considerations, and the role of the Conservation Reserve Program. Environ. Res. Lett. 8:1–19 [Google Scholar]
  77. Acreche MM, Valeiro AH. 77.  2013. Greenhouse gasses emissions and energy balances of a non-vertically integrated sugar and ethanol supply chain: a case study in Argentina. Energy 54:146–54 [Google Scholar]
  78. Rentizelas AA, Tatsiopoulos IP. 78.  2010. Locating a bioenergy facility using a hybrid optimization method. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 123:196–209 [Google Scholar]
  79. Rentizelas AA, Tatsiopoulos IP, Tolis A. 79.  2009. An optimization model for multi-biomass tri-generation energy supply. Biomass Bioenergy 33:223–33 [Google Scholar]
  80. Bauen AW, Dunnett AJ, Richter GM, Dailey AG, Aylott M. 80.  et al. 2010. Modelling supply and demand of bioenergy from short rotation coppice and Miscanthus in the UK. Bioresour. Technol. 101:8132–43 [Google Scholar]
  81. Suh K, Suh S, Walseth B, Bae J, Barker R. 81.  2011. Optimal corn stover logistics for biofuel production: a case in Minnesota. Trans. ASABE 54:229–38 [Google Scholar]
  82. Bowling IM, Ortega JMP, El-Halwagi MM. 82.  2011. Facility location and supply chain optimization for a biorefinery. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50:6276–86 [Google Scholar]
  83. dos Santos SP, Leal JE, Oliveira F. 83.  2011. The development of a natural gas transportation logistics management system. Energy Policy 39:4774–84 [Google Scholar]
  84. Bai Y, Ouyang Y, Pang JS. 84.  2012. Biofuel supply chain design under competitive agricultural land use and feedstock market equilibrium. Energy Econ. 34:1623–33 [Google Scholar]
  85. Pérez-Fortes M, Laínez-Aguirre JM, Arranz-Piera P, Velo E, Puigjaner L. 85.  2012. Design of regional and sustainable bio-based networks for electricity generation using a multi-objective MILP approach. Energy 44:79–95 [Google Scholar]
  86. Ng WPQ, Lam HL, Yusup S. 86.  2013. Supply network synthesis on rubber seed oil utilisation as potential biofuel feedstock. Energy 55:82–88 [Google Scholar]
  87. Foo DCY, Tan RR, Lam HL, Aziz MKA, Klemes JJ. 87.  2013. Robust models for the synthesis of flexible palm oil-based regional bioenergy supply chain. Energy 55:68–73 [Google Scholar]
  88. Rozakis S, Sourie JC, Vanderpooten D. 88.  2001. Integrated micro-economic modelling and multi-criteria methodology to support public decision-making: the case of liquid bio-fuels in France. Biomass Bioenergy 20:385–98 [Google Scholar]
  89. Dunnett AJ, Adjiman CS, Shah N. 89.  2008. A spatially explicit whole-system model of the lignocellulosic bioethanol supply chain: an assessment of decentralised processing potential. Biotechnol. Biofuels 1:13–40 [Google Scholar]
  90. Zamboni A, Shah N, Bezzo F. 90.  2009. Spatially explicit static model for the strategic design of future bioethanol production systems. 1. Cost minimization. Energy Fuels 23:5121–33 [Google Scholar]
  91. Zamboni A, Bezzo F, Shah N. 91.  2009. Spatially explicit static model for the strategic design of future bioethanol production systems. 2. Multi-objective environmental optimization. Energy Fuels 23:5134–43 [Google Scholar]
  92. Zamboni A, Murphy RJ, Woods J, Bezzo F, Shah N. 92.  2011. Biofuels carbon footprints: whole-systems optimisation for GHG emissions reduction. Bioresour. Technol. 102:7457–65 [Google Scholar]
  93. Tittmann PW, Parker NC, Hart QJ, Jenkins BM. 93.  2010. A spatially explicit techno-economic model of bioenergy and biofuels production in California. J. Transp. Geogr. 18:715–28 [Google Scholar]
  94. Parker N, Tittmann P, Hart Q, Nelson R, Skog K. 94.  et al. 2010. Development of a biorefinery optimized biofuel supply curve for the Western United States. Biomass Bioenergy 34:1597–607 [Google Scholar]
  95. Lam HL, Varbanov PS, Klemeš JJ. 95.  2010. Optimisation of regional energy supply chains utilising renewables: P-graph approach. Comp. Chem. Eng. 34:782–92 [Google Scholar]
  96. Leduc S, Schwab D, Dotzauer E, Schmid E, Obersteiner M. 96.  2008. Optimal location of wood gasification plants for methanol production with heat recovery. Int. J. Energy Res. 32:1080–91 [Google Scholar]
  97. Leduc S, Starfelt F, Dotzauer E, Kindermann G, McCallum I. 97.  et al. 2010. Optimal location of lignocellulosic ethanol refineries with polygeneration in Sweden. Energy 35:2709–16 [Google Scholar]
  98. Kim J, Realff MJ, Lee JH, Whittaker C, Furtner L. 98.  2011. Design of biomass processing network for biofuel production using an MILP model. Biomass Bioenergy 35:853–71 [Google Scholar]
  99. Corsano G, Vecchietti AR, Montagna JM. 99.  2011. Optimal design for sustainable bioethanol supply chain considering detailed plant performance model. Comp. Chem. Eng. 35:1384–98 [Google Scholar]
  100. Akgul O, Zamboni A, Bezzo F, Shah N, Papageorgiou LG. 100.  2011. Optimization-based approaches for bioethanol supply chains. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50:4927–38 [Google Scholar]
  101. Akgul O, Shah N, Papageorgiou LG. 101.  2012. Economic optimisation of a UK advanced biofuel supply chain. Biomass Bioenergy 41:57–72 [Google Scholar]
  102. Bai Y, Hwang T, Kang S, Ouyang Y. 102.  2011. Biofuel refinery location and supply chain planning under traffic congestion. Transp. Res. B 45:162–75 [Google Scholar]
  103. Kocoloski M, Griffin WM, Matthews HS. 103.  2011. Impacts of facility size and location decisions on ethanol production cost. Energy Policy 39:47–56 [Google Scholar]
  104. Natarajan K, Leduc S, Pelkonen P, Tomppo E, Dotzauer E. 104.  2012. Optimal locations for methanol and CHP production in Eastern Finland. Bioenergy Res. 5:412–23 [Google Scholar]
  105. Wetterlund E, Leduc S, Dotzauer E, Kindermann G. 105.  2012. Optimal localisation of biofuel production on a European scale. Energy 41:462–72 [Google Scholar]
  106. Marvin WA, Schmidt LD, Daoutidis P. 106.  2013. Biorefinery location and technology selection through supply chain optimization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52:3192–208 [Google Scholar]
  107. Wang S, Hastings A, Smith P. 107.  2012. An optimization model for energy crop supply. GCB Bioenergy 4:88–95 [Google Scholar]
  108. Ayoub N, Seki H, Naka Y. 108.  2009. Superstructure-based design and operation for biomass utilization networks. Comp. Chem. Eng. 33:1770–80 [Google Scholar]
  109. Ayoub N, Yuji N. 109.  2012. Demand-driven optimization approach for biomass utilization networks. Comp. Chem. Eng. 36:129–39 [Google Scholar]
  110. Ayoub N, Elmoshi E, Seki H, Naka Y. 110.  2009. Evolutionary algorithms approach for integrated bioenergy supply chains optimization. Energy Convers. Manag. 50:2944–55 [Google Scholar]
  111. Cucek L, Lam HL, Klemes JJ, Varbanov PS, Kravanja Z. 111.  2010. Synthesis of regional networks for the supply of energy and bioproducts. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 12:635–45 [Google Scholar]
  112. Cucek L, Varbanov PS, Klemes JJ, Kravanja Z. 112.  2012. Total footprints-based multi-criteria optimisation of regional biomass energy supply chains. Energy 44:135–45 [Google Scholar]
  113. Cucek L, Klemes JJ, Varbanov PS, Kravanja Z. 113.  2013. Dealing with high-dimensionality of criteria in multiobjective optimization of biomass energy supply network. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52:7223–39 [Google Scholar]
  114. Lam HL, Klemeš JJ, Kravanja Z. 114.  2011. Model-size reduction techniques for large-scale biomass production and supply networks. Energy 36:4599–608 [Google Scholar]
  115. Elia JA, Baliban RC, Floudas CA, Gurau B, Weingarten MB, Klotz SD. 115.  2013. Hardwood biomass to gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel: 2. Supply chain optimization framework for a network of thermochemical refineries. Energy Fuels 27:4325–52 [Google Scholar]
  116. Elia JA, Baliban RC, Floudas CA. 116.  2014. Nationwide, regional, and statewide energy supply chain optimization for natural gas to liquid transportation fuel (GTL) systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 535366–97
  117. Kim J, Realff MJ, Lee JH. 117.  2011. Optimal design and global sensitivity analysis of biomass supply chain networks for biofuels under uncertainty. Comp. Chem. Eng. 35:1738–51 [Google Scholar]
  118. Cucek L, Klemes JJ, Varbanov PS, Kravanja Z. 118.  2012. Reducing the dimensionality of criteria in multi-objective optimisation of biomass energy supply chains. Chem. Eng. Trans. 29:1231–36 [Google Scholar]
  119. Zhu X, Li X, Yao Q, Chen Y. 119.  2011. Challenges and models in supporting logistics system design for dedicated-biomass-based bioenergy industry. Bioresour. Technol. 102:1344–51 [Google Scholar]
  120. Zhu X, Yao QZ. 120.  2011. Logistics system design for biomass-to-bioenergy industry with multiple types of feedstocks. Bioresour. Technol. 102:10936–45 [Google Scholar]
  121. Giarola S, Zamboni A, Bezzo F. 121.  2011. Spatially explicit multi-objective optimisation for design and planning of hybrid first and second generation biorefineries. Comp. Chem. Eng. 35:1782–97 [Google Scholar]
  122. Giarola S, Zamboni A, Bezzo F. 122.  2012. Environmentally conscious capacity planning and technology selection for bioethanol supply chains. Renew. Energy 43:61–72 [Google Scholar]
  123. Giarola S, Zamboni A, Bezzo F. 123.  2012. A comprehensive approach to the design of ethanol supply chains including carbon trading effects. Bioresour. Technol. 107:175–85 [Google Scholar]
  124. Dal-Mas M, Giarola S, Zamboni A, Bezzo F. 124.  2011. Strategic design and investment capacity planning of the ethanol supply chain under price uncertainty. Biomass Bioenergy 35:2059–71 [Google Scholar]
  125. Ekşioğlu SD, Acharya A, Leightley LE, Arora S. 125.  2009. Analyzing the design and management of biomass-to-biorefinery supply chain. Comp. Ind. Eng. 57:1342–52 [Google Scholar]
  126. An H, Wilhelm WE, Searcy SW. 126.  2011. A mathematical model to design a lignocellulosic biofuel supply chain system with a case study based on a region in Central Texas. Bioresour. Technol. 102:7860–70 [Google Scholar]
  127. Huang Y, Chen CW, Fan Y. 127.  2010. Multistage optimization of the supply chains of biofuels. Transp. Res. E 46:820–30 [Google Scholar]
  128. Chen CW, Fan Y. 128.  2012. Bioethanol supply chain system planning under supply and demand uncertainties. Transp. Res. E 48:150–64 [Google Scholar]
  129. You F, Wang B. 129.  2011. Life cycle optimization of biomass-to-liquid supply chains with distributed-centralized processing networks. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50:10102–27 [Google Scholar]
  130. Gebreslassie BH, Yao Y, You F. 130.  2012. Design under uncertainty of hydrocarbon biorefinery supply chains: multiobjective stochastic programming models, decomposition algorithm, and a comparison between CVaR and downside risk. AIChE J. 58:2155–79 [Google Scholar]
  131. Sharma P, Sarker BR, Romagnoli JA. 131.  2011. A decision support tool for strategic planning of sustainable biorefineries. Comp. Chem. Eng. 35:1767–81 [Google Scholar]
  132. Liu P, Whitaker A, Pistikopoulos EN, Li Z. 132.  2011. A mixed-integer programming approach to strategic planning of chemical centers: a case study in the UK. Comp. Chem. Eng. 35:1359–73 [Google Scholar]
  133. Papapostolou C, Kondili E, Kaldellis JK. 133.  2011. Development and implementation of an optimisation model for biofuels supply chain. Energy 36:6019–26 [Google Scholar]
  134. Andersen F, Iturmendi F, Espinosa S, Diaz MS. 134.  2012. Optimal design and planning of biodiesel supply chain with land competition. Comp. Chem. Eng. 47:170–82 [Google Scholar]
  135. Walther G, Schatka A, Spengler TS. 135.  2012. Design of regional production networks for second generation synthetic bio-fuel—a case study in Northern Germany. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 218:280–92 [Google Scholar]
  136. van Dyken S, Bakken BH, Skjelbred HI. 136.  2010. Linear mixed-integer models for biomass supply chains with transport, storage and processing. Energy 35:1338–50 [Google Scholar]
  137. Shastri YN, Rodriguez LF, Hansen AC, Ting KC. 137.  2012. Impact of distributed storage and pre-processing on Miscanthus production and provision systems. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 6:21–31 [Google Scholar]
  138. Acuna M, Anttila P, Sikanen L, Prinz R, Asikainen A. 138.  2012. Predicting and controlling moisture content to optimise forest biomass logistics. Croat. J. Forest Eng. 33:225–38 [Google Scholar]
  139. Alam MB, Pulkki R, Shahi C, Upadhyay T. 139.  2012. Modeling woody biomass procurement for bioenergy production at the Atikokan Generating Station in Northwestern Ontario, Canada. Energies 5:5065–85 [Google Scholar]
  140. Lim JS, Manan ZA, Hashim H, Alwi SRW. 140.  2013. Optimal multi-site resource allocation and utility planning for integrated rice mill complex. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52:3816–31 [Google Scholar]
  141. Lim JS, Manan ZA, Alwi SRW, Hashim H. 141.  2013. A multi-period model for optimal planning of an integrated, resource-efficient rice mill. Comp. Chem. Eng. 52:77–89 [Google Scholar]
  142. Bernardi A, Giarola S, Bezzo F. 142.  2012. Optimizing the economics and the carbon and water footprints of bioethanol supply chains. Biofuels Bioprod. Bioref. 6:656–72 [Google Scholar]
  143. Palander T. 143.  2011. Modelling renewable supply chain for electricity generation with forest, fossil, and wood-waste fuels. Energy 36:5984–93 [Google Scholar]
  144. Kostin AM, Guillén-Gosálbez G, Mele FD, Bagajewicz MJ, Jiménez L. 144.  2011. A novel rolling horizon strategy for the strategic planning of supply chains. Application to the sugar cane industry of Argentina. Comp. Chem. Eng. 35:2540–63 [Google Scholar]
  145. Copado-Méndez PJ, Blum C, Guillén-Gosálbez G, Jiménez L. 145.  2013. Large neighbourhood search applied to the efficient solution of spatially explicit strategic supply chain management problems. Comp. Chem. Eng. 49:114–26 [Google Scholar]
  146. Ekşioğlu SD, Li S, Zhang S, Sokhansanj S, Petrolia D. 146.  2010. Analyzing impact of intermodal facilities on design and management of biofuel supply chain. Transp. Res. Rec. 2191:144–51 [Google Scholar]
  147. Hainoun A, Aldin MS, Almoustafa S. 147.  2010. Formulating an optimal long-term energy supply strategy for Syria using MESSAGE model. Energy Policy 38:1701–14 [Google Scholar]
  148. Unsihuay-Vila C, Marangon-Lima JW, de Souza ACZ, Perez-Arriaga IJ, Balestrassi PP. 148.  2010. A model to long-term, multiarea, multistage, and integrated expansion planning of electricity and natural gas systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25:1154–68 [Google Scholar]
  149. Leduc S, Lundgren J, Franklin O, Dotzauer E. 149.  2010. Location of a biomass based methanol production plant: a dynamic problem in northern Sweden. Appl. Energy 87:68–75 [Google Scholar]
  150. Avami A. 150.  2012. A model for biodiesel supply chain: a case study in Iran. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16:4196–203 [Google Scholar]
  151. Avami A. 151.  2013. Assessment of optimal biofuel supply chain planning in Iran: technical, economic, and agricultural perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 26:761–68 [Google Scholar]
  152. Bernardi A, Giarola S, Bezzo F. 152.  2013. Spatially explicit multiobjective optimization for the strategic design of first and second generation biorefineries including carbon and water footprints. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52:7170–80 [Google Scholar]
  153. Varela TP, Barbosa-Póvoa APFD, Novais AQ. 153.  2011. Bi-objective optimization approach to the design and planning of supply chains: economic versus environmental performances. Comp. Chem. Eng. 35:1454–68 [Google Scholar]
  154. You F, Tao L, Graziano DJ, Snyder SW. 154.  2012. Optimal design of sustainable cellulosic biofuel supply chains: multiobjective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment and input-output analysis. AIChE J. 58:1157–80 [Google Scholar]
  155. Akgul O, Shah N, Papageorgiou LG. 155.  2012. An optimisation framework for a hybrid first/second generation bioethanol supply chain. Comp. Chem. Eng. 42:101–14 [Google Scholar]
  156. Marvin WA, Schmidt LD, Benjaafar S, Tiffany DG, Daoutidis P. 156.  2012. Economic optimization of a lignocellulosic biomass-to-ethanol supply chain. Chem. Eng. Sci. 67:68–79 [Google Scholar]
  157. McLean K, Li X. 157.  2013. Robust scenario formulations for strategic supply chain optimization under uncertainty. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52:5721–34 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040425
Loading
Energy Supply Chain Optimization of Hybrid Feedstock Processes: A Review
Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering 5, 147 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040425
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040425
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040425
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error