1932

Abstract

The field of behavioral economics has made important inroads into the understanding of substance use disorders through the concept of reinforcer pathology. Reinforcer pathology refers to the joint effects of () the persistently high valuation of a reinforcer, broadly defined to include tangible commodities and experiences, and/or () the excessive preference for the immediate acquisition or consumption of a commodity despite long-term negative outcomes. From this perspective, reinforcer pathology results from the recursive interactions of endogenous person-level variables and exogenous environment-level factors. The current review describes the basic principles of behavioral economics that are central to reinforcer pathology, the processes that engender reinforcer pathology, and the approaches and procedures that can repair reinforcement pathologies. The overall goal of this review is to present a new understanding of substance use disorders as viewed by recent advances in behavioral economics.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153724
2014-03-28
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/clinpsy/10/1/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153724.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153724&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Acheson A, Vincent AS, Sorocco KH, Lovallo WR. 2011. Greater discounting of delayed rewards in young adults with family histories of alcohol and drug use disorders: studies from the Oklahoma family health patterns project. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 35:1607–13 [Google Scholar]
  2. Acker J, Amlung M, Stojek M, Murphy JG, MacKillop J. 2012. Individual variation in behavioral economic indices of the relative value of alcohol: incremental validity in relation to impulsivity, craving, and intellectual functioning. J. Exp. Psychopathol. 3:423–36 [Google Scholar]
  3. Acker J, MacKillop J. 2013. Behavioral economic analysis of cue-elicited craving for tobacco: a virtual reality study. Nicotine Tob. Res. 15:1409–16 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alessi SM, Badger GJ, Higgins ST. 2004. An experimental examination of the initial weeks of abstinence in cigarette smokers. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 12:276–87 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alessi SM, Petry NM. 2003. Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure. Behav. Process. 64:345–54 [Google Scholar]
  6. Alessi SM, Petry NM. 2013. A randomized study of cellphone technology to reinforce alcohol abstinence in the natural environment. Addiction 108:900–9 [Google Scholar]
  7. Alexander BK, Coambs RB, Hadaway PF. 1978. The effect of housing and gender on morphine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 58:175–79 [Google Scholar]
  8. Andrade LF, Petry NM. 2012. Delay and probability discounting in pathological gamblers with and without a history of substance use problems. Psychopharmacology 219:491–99 [Google Scholar]
  9. Anker JJ, Perry JL, Gliddon LA, Carroll ME. 2009. Impulsivity predicts the escalation of cocaine self-administration in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 93:343–48 [Google Scholar]
  10. Anokhin AP, Golosheykin S, Grant JD, Heath AC. 2011. Heritability of delay discounting in adolescence: a longitudinal twin study. Behav. Genet. 41:175–83 [Google Scholar]
  11. Anton RF, Oroszi G, O'Malley S, Couper D, Swift R. et al. 2008. An evaluation of μ-opioid receptor (OPRM1) as a predictor of naltrexone response in the treatment of alcohol dependence: results from the Combined Pharmacotherapies and Behavioral Interventions for Alcohol Dependence (COMBINE) study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 65:135–44 [Google Scholar]
  12. Audrain-McGovern J, Rodriguez D, Epstein LH, Cuevas J, Rodgers K, Wileyto EP. 2009a. Does delay discounting play an etiological role in smoking or is it a consequence of smoking?. Drug Alcohol Depend. 103:99–106 [Google Scholar]
  13. Audrain-McGovern J, Rodriguez D, Epstein LH, Rodgers K, Cuevas J, Wileyto EP. 2009b. Young adult smoking: What factors differentiate ex-smokers, smoking cessation treatment seekers and nontreatment seekers?. Addict. Behav. 34:1036–41 [Google Scholar]
  14. Audrain-McGovern J, Rodriguez D, Rodgers K, Cuevas J. 2011. Declining alternative reinforcers link depression to young adult smoking. Addiction 106:178–87 [Google Scholar]
  15. Baker F, Johnson MW, Bickel WK. 2003. Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 112:382–92 [Google Scholar]
  16. Baum WM, Rachlin HC. 1969. Choice as time allocation. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 12:861–74 [Google Scholar]
  17. Beck RC, Triplett MF. 2009. Test-retest reliability of a group-administered paper-pencil measure of delay discounting. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 17:345–55 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bernstein M, Murphy JG, MacKillop J, Colby SM. 2013. Alcohol demand indices predict outcomes among heavy-drinking young adults receiving a brief intervention Presented at Annu. Meet. Coll. Probl. Drug Depend., 75th, San Diego
  19. Best JR, Theim KR, Gredysa DM, Stein RI, Welch RR. et al. 2012. Behavioral economic predictors of overweight children's weight loss. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 80:1086–96 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bickel WK, Amass L, Crean JP, Badger GJ. 1999a. Buprenorphine dosing every 1, 2, or 3 days in opioid-dependent patients. Psychopharmacology 146:111–18 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bickel WK, Amass L, Higgins ST, Badger GJ, Esch RA. 1997. Effects of adding behavioral treatment to opioid detoxification with buprenorphine. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 65:803–10 [Google Scholar]
  22. Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST. 1993. Behavioral economics: a novel experimental approach to the study of drug dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 33:173–92 [Google Scholar]
  23. Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST, Hughes JR. 1990. Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. I. Functional equivalence of response requirement and drug dose. Life Sci. 47:1501–10 [Google Scholar]
  24. Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST, Hughes JR, Badger GJ. 1995. Effects of simulated employment and recreation on drug taking: a behavioral economic analysis. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 3:467–76 [Google Scholar]
  25. Bickel WK, Jarmolowicz DP, MacKillop J, Epstein LH, Carr K. et al. 2012a. The behavioral economics of reinforcement pathologies. Addiction Syndrome Handbook HJ Shaffer Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bickel WK, Jarmolowicz DP, Mueller ET, Franck CT, Carrin C, Gatchalian KM. 2012b. Altruism in time: social temporal discounting differentiates smokers from problem drinkers. Psychopharmacology 224:109–20 [Google Scholar]
  27. Bickel WK, Jarmolowicz DP, Mueller ET, Gatchalian KM. 2011a. The behavioral economics and neuroeconomics of reinforcer pathologies: implications for etiology and treatment of addiction. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 13:406–15 [Google Scholar]
  28. Bickel WK, Landes RD, Christensen DR, Jackson L, Jones BA. et al. 2011b. Single- and cross-commodity discounting among cocaine addicts: the commodity and its temporal location determine discounting rate. Psychopharmacology 217:177–87 [Google Scholar]
  29. Bickel WK, Marsch LA. 1999. Combined behavioral and pharmacological treatment during opioid detoxification. a review. Motivation Behavior Change Among Illicit-Drug Abusers: Contemporary Research on Contingency-Management Interventions ST Higgins, K Silverman 265–79 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bickel WK, Marsch LA, Carroll ME. 2000. Deconstructing relative reinforcing efficacy and situating the measures of pharmacological reinforcement with behavioral economics: a theoretical proposal. Psychopharmacology 153:44–56 [Google Scholar]
  31. Bickel WK, Mueller ET, Jarmolowicz DP. 2013. What is addiction?. Addictions: A Comprehensive Guidebook B McCrady, EE Epstein 3–16 New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bickel WK, Odum AL, Madden GJ. 1999b. Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology 146:447–54 [Google Scholar]
  33. Bickel WK, Pitcock JA, Yi R, Angtuaco EJC. 2009. Congruence of BOLD response across intertemporal choice conditions: fictive and real money gains and losses. J. Neurosci. 29:8839–46 [Google Scholar]
  34. Bickel WK, Yi R, Landes RD, Hill PF, Baxter C. 2011c. Remember the Future: working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts. Biol. Psychiatry 69:260–65 [Google Scholar]
  35. Bierut LJ. 2010. Convergence of genetic findings for nicotine dependence and smoking related diseases with chromosome 15q24-25. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 31:46–51 [Google Scholar]
  36. Bjork JM, Hommer DW, Grant SJ, Danube C. 2004. Impulsivity in abstinent alcohol-dependent patients: relation to control subjects and type 1-/type 2 like traits. Alcohol 34:133–50 [Google Scholar]
  37. Bobova L, Finn PR, Rickert ME, Lucas J. 2009. Disinhibitory psychopathology and delay discounting in alcohol dependence: personality and cognitive correlates. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 17:51–61 [Google Scholar]
  38. Boettiger CA, Mitchell JM, Tavares VC, Robertson M, Joslyn G. et al. 2007. Immediate reward bias in humans: fronto-parietal networks and a role for the catechol-O-methyltransferase 158 (Val/Val) genotype. J. Neurosci. 27:14383–91 [Google Scholar]
  39. Bowers TG, Winett RA, Frederiksen LW. 1987. Nicotine fading, behavioral contracting, and extended treatment: effects on smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 12:181–84 [Google Scholar]
  40. Bradstreet MP, Higgins ST, Heil SH, Badger GJ, Skelly JM. et al. 2012. Social discounting and cigarette smoking during pregnancy. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 25:502–11 [Google Scholar]
  41. Bujarski S, MacKillop J, Ray LA. 2012. A behavioral economic approach to understanding alcoholism pharmacotherapy mechanisms: evidence for naltrexone in Asian Americans. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 20:181–90 [Google Scholar]
  42. Cardinal RN. 2006. Neural systems implicated in delayed and probabilistic reinforcement. Neural Netw. 19:1277–301 [Google Scholar]
  43. Carr KA, Daniel TO, Lin H, Epstein LH. 2011. Reinforcement pathology and obesity. Curr. Drug Abuse Rev. 4:190–96 [Google Scholar]
  44. Carroll KM, Nich C, Lapaglia DM, Peters EN, Easton CJ, Petry NM. 2012. Combining cognitive behavioral therapy and contingency management to enhance their effects in treating cannabis dependence: less can be more, more or less. Addiction 107:1650–59 [Google Scholar]
  45. Carroll KM, Rounsaville BJ, Nich C, Gordon LT, Wirtz PW, Gawin F. 1994. One-year follow-up of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for cocaine dependence. Delayed emergence of psychotherapy effects. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 51:989–97 [Google Scholar]
  46. Carroll ME, Anker JJ, Perry JL. 2009. Modeling risk factors for nicotine and other drug abuse in the preclinical laboratory. Drug Alcohol Depend. 104:Suppl. 1S70–78 [Google Scholar]
  47. Chaloupka FJ, Yurekli A, Fong GT. 2012. Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy. Tob. Control 21:172–80 [Google Scholar]
  48. Chase HW, Mackillop J, Hogarth L. 2013. Isolating behavioural economic indices of demand in relation to nicotine dependence. Psychopharmacology 226:371–80 [Google Scholar]
  49. Cheng J, Lu Y, Han X, Gonzalez-Vallejo C, Sui N. 2012. Temporal discounting in heroin-dependent patients: no sign effect, weaker magnitude effect, and the relationship with inhibitory control. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 20:400–9 [Google Scholar]
  50. Christensen CJ, Silberberg A, Hursh SR, Roma PG, Riley AL. 2008. Demand for cocaine and food over time. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 91:209–16 [Google Scholar]
  51. Chung SH, Herrnstein RJ. 1967. Choice and delay of reinforcement. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 10:67–74 [Google Scholar]
  52. Claus E, Kiehl KA, Hutchison K. 2011. Neural and behavioral mechanisms of impulsive choice in alcohol use disorder. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 35:1209–19 [Google Scholar]
  53. Coffey SF, Gudleski GD, Saladin ME, Brady KT. 2003. Impulsivity and rapid discounting of delayed hypothetical rewards in cocaine-dependent individuals. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 11:18–25 [Google Scholar]
  54. Correia CJ, Benson TA, Carey KB. 2005. Decreased substance use following increases in alternative behaviors: a preliminary investigation. Addict. Behav. 30:19–27 [Google Scholar]
  55. Correia CJ, Carey KB, Simons J, Borsari BE. 2003. Relationships between binge drinking and substance-free reinforcement in a sample of college students: a preliminary investigation. Addict. Behav. 28:361–68 [Google Scholar]
  56. Correia CJ, Simons J, Carey KB, Borsari BE. 1998. Predicting drug use: application of behavioral theories of choice. Addict. Behav. 23:705–9 [Google Scholar]
  57. Cosgrove KP, Carroll ME. 2003. Effects of a non-drug reinforcer, saccharin, on oral self-administration of phencyclidine in male and female rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 170:9–16 [Google Scholar]
  58. Cosgrove KP, Hunter RG, Carroll ME. 2002. Wheel-running attenuates intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats: sex differences. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 73:663–71 [Google Scholar]
  59. Dallery J, Locey ML. 2005. Effects of acute and chronic nicotine on impulsive choice in rats. Behav. Pharmacol. 16:15–23 [Google Scholar]
  60. Dallery J, Meredith S, Glenn IM. 2008. A deposit contract method to deliver abstinence reinforcement for cigarette smoking. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 41:609–15 [Google Scholar]
  61. Daughters SB, Magidson JF, Schuster RM, Safren SA. 2010. ACT HEALTHY: a combined cognitive-behavioral depression and medication adherence treatment for HIV-infected substance users. Cogn. Behav. Pract. 17:309–21 [Google Scholar]
  62. de Wit H, Enggasser JL, Richards JB. 2002. Acute administration of d-amphetamine decreases impulsivity in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:813–25 [Google Scholar]
  63. DeFulio A, Silverman K. 2011. Employment-based abstinence reinforcement as a maintenance intervention for the treatment of cocaine dependence: post-intervention outcomes. Addiction 106:960–67 [Google Scholar]
  64. DeGrandpre RJ, Bickel WK. 1996. Drug dependence as consumer demand. Advances in Behavioral Economics 3 L Green, JH Kagel 1–35 Westport, CT: Ablex [Google Scholar]
  65. DeGrandpre RJ, Bickel WK, Hughes JR, Layng MP, Badger G. 1993. Unit price as a useful metric in analyzing effects of reinforcer magnitude. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 60:641–66 [Google Scholar]
  66. Diamond G, Godley SH, Liddle HA, Sampl S, Webb C. et al. 2002. Five outpatient treatment models for adolescent marijuana use: a description of the cannabis youth treatment interventions. Addiction 97:Suppl. 170–83 [Google Scholar]
  67. Diergaarde L, van Mourik Y, Pattij T, Schoffelmeer AN, De Vries TJ. 2012. Poor impulse control predicts inelastic demand for nicotine but not alcohol in rats. Addict. Biol. 17:576–87 [Google Scholar]
  68. Diller JW, Patros CH, Prentice PR. 2011. Temporal discounting and heart rate reactivity to stress. Behav. Process. 87:306–9 [Google Scholar]
  69. Eisenberg D, MacKillop J, Modi M, Beauchemin J, Dang D. et al. 2007. Examining impulsivity as an endophenotype using a behavioral approach: a DRD2 TaqI A and DRD4 48-bp VNTR association study. Behav. Brain Funct. 3:2 [Google Scholar]
  70. Elliott R, Tighe T. 1968. Breaking the cigarette habit: effects of a technique involving threatened loss of money. Psychol. Rec. 18:503–13 [Google Scholar]
  71. Epstein LH, Carr KA, Lin H, Fletcher KD. 2011. Food reinforcement, energy intake, and macronutrient choice. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 94:12–18 [Google Scholar]
  72. Epstein LH, Dearing KK, Temple JL, Cavanaugh MD. 2008. Food reinforcement and impulsivity in overweight children and their parents. Eat. Behav. 9:319–27 [Google Scholar]
  73. Epstein LH, Richards JB, Saad FG, Paluch RA, Roemmich JN, Lerman C. 2003. Comparison between two measures of delay discounting in smokers. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 11:131–38 [Google Scholar]
  74. Epstein LH, Temple JL, Neaderhiser BJ, Salis RJ, Erbe RW, Leddy JJ. 2007. Food reinforcement, the dopamine D2 receptor genotype, and energy intake in obese and nonobese humans. Behav. Neurosci. 121:877–86 [Google Scholar]
  75. Epstein LH, Wright SM, Paluch RA, Leddy J, Hawk LW Jr. et al. 2004. Food hedonics and reinforcement as determinants of laboratory food intake in smokers. Physiol. Behav. 81:511–17 [Google Scholar]
  76. Fals-Stewart W, Klostermann K, Yates BT, O'Farrell TJ, Birchler GR. 2005. Brief relationship therapy for alcoholism: a randomized clinical trial examining clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 19:363–71 [Google Scholar]
  77. Fals-Stewart W, O'Farrell TJ, Birchler GR. 2004. Behavioral couples therapy for substance abuse: rationale, methods, and findings. Sci. Pract. Perspect. 2:30–41 [Google Scholar]
  78. Feldstein Ewing SW, LaChance HA, Bryan A, Hutchison KE. 2009. Do genetic and individual risk factors moderate the efficacy of motivational enhancement therapy? Drinking outcomes with an emerging adult sample. Addict. Biol. 14:356–65 [Google Scholar]
  79. Few LR, Acker J, Murphy C, MacKillop J. 2012. Temporal stability of a cigarette purchase task. Nicotine Tob. Res. 14:761–65 [Google Scholar]
  80. Field M, Santarcangelo M, Sumnall H, Goudie A, Cole J. 2006. Delay discounting and the behavioural economics of cigarette purchases in smokers: the effects of nicotine deprivation. Psychopharmacology 186:255–63 [Google Scholar]
  81. Fields S, Leraas K, Collins C, Reynolds B. 2009. Delay discounting as a mediator of the relationship between perceived stress and cigarette smoking status in adolescents. Behav. Pharmacol. 20:455–60 [Google Scholar]
  82. Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O'Donoghue T. 2002. Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J. Econ. Lit. 40:351–401 [Google Scholar]
  83. Gentile ND, Librizzi EH, Martinetti MP. 2012. Academic constraints on alcohol consumption in college students: a behavioral economic analysis. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 20:390–99 [Google Scholar]
  84. Giordano L, Bickel WK, Loewenstein G, Jacobs EA, Marsch L, Badger GJ. 2002. Mild opioid deprivation increases the degree that opioid-dependent outpatients discount delayed heroin and money. Psychopharmacology 163:174–82 [Google Scholar]
  85. Goldman D, Oroszi G, Ducci F. 2005. The genetics of addictions: uncovering the genes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6:521–32 [Google Scholar]
  86. Gottesman II, Gould TD. 2003. The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. Am. J. Psychiatry 160:636–45 [Google Scholar]
  87. Gray JA, MacKillop J. 2013. Interrelationships among individual differences in alcohol demand, impulsivity, and alcohol misuse. Psychol. Addict. Behav. In press
  88. Green L, Fristoe N, Myerson J. 1994. Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomes. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1:383–89 [Google Scholar]
  89. Hadaway PF, Alexander BK, Coambs RB, Beyerstein B. 1979. The effect of housing and gender on preference for morphine-sucrose solutions in rats. Psychopharmacology 66:87–91 [Google Scholar]
  90. Hartzler B, Lash SJ, Roll JM. 2012. Contingency management in substance abuse treatment: a structured review of the evidence for its transportability. Drug Alcohol Depend. 122:1–10 [Google Scholar]
  91. Heil SH, Holmes HW, Bickel WK, Higgins ST, Badger GJ. et al. 2002. Comparison of the subjective, physiological, and psychomotor effects of atomoxetine and methylphenidate in light drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 67:149–56 [Google Scholar]
  92. Heil SH, Johnson MW, Higgins ST, Bickel WK. 2006. Delay discounting in currently using and currently abstinent cocaine-dependent outpatients and non-drug-using matched controls. Addict. Behav. 31:1290–94 [Google Scholar]
  93. Herrnstein RJ. 1961. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 4:267–72 [Google Scholar]
  94. Herrnstein RJ. 1970. On the law of effect. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 13:243–66 [Google Scholar]
  95. Herrnstein RJ, Prelec D. 1992. A theory of addiction. Choice Over Time G Loewenstein, J Elster 331–60 New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  96. Heyman GM, Gibb SP. 2006. Delay discounting in college cigarette chippers. Behav. Pharmacol. 17:669–79 [Google Scholar]
  97. Higgins ST, Bickel WK, Hughes JR. 1994. Influence of an alternative reinforcer on human cocaine self-administration. Life Sci. 55:179–87 [Google Scholar]
  98. Higgins ST, Budney AJ, Bickel WK, Hughes JR, Foerg F, Badger G. 1993. Achieving cocaine abstinence with a behavioral approach. Am. J. Psychiatry 150:763–69 [Google Scholar]
  99. Higgins ST, Delaney DD, Budney AJ, Bickel WK, Hughes JR. et al. 1991. A behavioral approach to achieving initial cocaine abstinence. Am. J. Psychiatry 148:1218–24 [Google Scholar]
  100. Higgins ST, Heil SH, Solomon LJ, Bernstein IM, Lussier JP. et al. 2004. A pilot study on voucher-based incentives to promote abstinence from cigarette smoking during pregnancy and postpartum. Nicotine Tob. Res. 6:1015–20 [Google Scholar]
  101. Hoffman WF, Moore M, Templin R, McFarland B, Hitzemann RJ, Mitchell SH. 2006. Neuropsychological function and delay discounting in methamphetamine-dependent individuals. Psychopharmacology 188:162–70 [Google Scholar]
  102. Hoffman WF, Schwartz DL, Huckans MS, McFarland BH, Meiri G. et al. 2008. Cortical activation during delay discounting in abstinent methamphetamine dependent individuals. Psychopharmacology 201:183–93 [Google Scholar]
  103. Hofmeyr A, Ainslie G, Charlton R, Ross D. 2011. The relationship between addiction and reward bundling: an experiment comparing smokers and non-smokers. Addiction 106:402–9 [Google Scholar]
  104. Holt DD, Green L, Myerson J. 2003. Is discounting impulsive? Evidence from temporal and probability discounting in gambling and non-gambling college students. Behav. Process. 64:355–67 [Google Scholar]
  105. Houben K, Wiers RW, Jansen A. 2011. Getting a grip on drinking behavior: training working memory to reduce alcohol abuse. Psychol. Sci. 22:968–75 [Google Scholar]
  106. Hursh SR. 1980. Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 34:219–38 [Google Scholar]
  107. Hursh SR. 1984. Behavioral economics. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 42:435–52 [Google Scholar]
  108. Hursh SR, Roma PG. 2013. Behavioral economics and empirical public policy. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 99:98–124 [Google Scholar]
  109. Hursh SR, Winger G. 1995. Normalized demand for drugs and other reinforcers. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 64:373–84 [Google Scholar]
  110. Huskinson SL, Krebs CA, Anderson KG. 2012. Strain differences in delay discounting between Lewis and Fischer 344 rats at baseline and following acute and chronic administration of d-amphetamine. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 101:403–16 [Google Scholar]
  111. Iguchi MY, Belding MA, Morral AR, Lamb RJ, Husband SD. 1997. Reinforcing operants other than abstinence in drug abuse treatment: an effective alternative for reducing drug use. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 65:421–28 [Google Scholar]
  112. Jacobs SB, Wagner MK. 1984. Obese and nonobese individuals: behavioral and personality characteristics. Addict. Behav. 9:223–26 [Google Scholar]
  113. Jasinski DR, Faries DE, Moore RJ, Schuh LM, Allen AJ. 2008. Abuse liability assessment of atomoxetine in a drug-abusing population. Drug Alcohol Depend. 95:140–46 [Google Scholar]
  114. John LK, Loewenstein G, Troxel AB, Norton L, Fassbender JE, Volpp KG. 2011. Financial incentives for extended weight loss: a randomized, controlled trial. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 26:621–26 [Google Scholar]
  115. Johnson MW, Bickel WK. 2002. Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 77:129–46 [Google Scholar]
  116. Johnson MW, Bickel WK, Baker F. 2007. Moderate drug use and delay discounting: a comparison of heavy, light, and never smokers. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 15:187–94 [Google Scholar]
  117. Johnson MW, Bickel WK, Baker F, Moore BA, Badger GJ, Budney AJ. 2010. Delay discounting in current and former marijuana-dependent individuals. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 18:99–107 [Google Scholar]
  118. Johnson MW, Bruner NR. 2012. The sexual discounting task: HIV risk behavior and the discounting of delayed sexual rewards in cocaine dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 123:15–21 [Google Scholar]
  119. Johnson WG. 1974. Effect of cue prominence and subject weight on human food-directed performance. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 29:843–48 [Google Scholar]
  120. Jones B, Rachlin H. 2006. Social discounting. Psychol. Sci. 17:283–86 [Google Scholar]
  121. Kalivas PW, Volkow ND. 2005. The neural basis of addiction: a pathology of motivation and choice. Am. J. Psychiatry 162:1403–13 [Google Scholar]
  122. Kendler KS, Chen X, Dick D, Maes H, Gillespie N. et al. 2012. Recent advances in the genetic epidemiology and molecular genetics of substance use disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 15:181–89 [Google Scholar]
  123. Khurana A, Romer D, Betancourt LM, Brodsky NL, Giannetta JM, Hurt H. 2013. Working memory ability predicts trajectories of early alcohol use in adolescents: the mediational role of impulsivity. Addiction 108:506–15 [Google Scholar]
  124. Kim SG, Kim CM, Choi SW, Jae YM, Lee HG. et al. 2009. A micro opioid receptor gene polymorphism (A118G) and naltrexone treatment response in adherent Korean alcohol-dependent patients. Psychopharmacology 201:611–18 [Google Scholar]
  125. Kirby KN, Petry NM. 2004. Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drug-using controls. Addiction 99:461–71 [Google Scholar]
  126. Kirby KN, Petry NM, Bickel WK. 1999. Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 128:78–87 [Google Scholar]
  127. Kleiman MAR. 2009. When Brute Force Fails: How To Have Less Crime and Less Punishment Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  128. Koffarnus MN, Jarmolowicz DP, Mueller ET, Bickel WK. 2013. Changing delay discounting in the light of the competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory: a review. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 99:32–57 [Google Scholar]
  129. Koffarnus MN, Wong CJ, Diemer K, Needham M, Hampton J. et al. 2011. A randomized clinical trial of a Therapeutic Workplace for chronically unemployed, homeless, alcohol-dependent adults. Alcohol Alcohol. 46:561–69 [Google Scholar]
  130. Koffarnus MN, Woods JH. 2013. Individual differences in discount rate are associated with demand for self-administered cocaine, but not sucrose. Addict. Biol. 18:8–18 [Google Scholar]
  131. Kollins SH, MacDonald EK, Rush CR. 2001. Assessing the abuse potential of methylphenidate in nonhuman and human subjects: a review. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 68:611–27 [Google Scholar]
  132. Komro KA, Perry CL, Williams CL, Stigler MH, Farbakhsh K, Veblen-Mortenson S. 2001. How did Project Northland reduce alcohol use among young adolescents? Analysis of mediating variables. Health Educ. Res. 16:59–70 [Google Scholar]
  133. Koob GF. 2006. The neurobiology of addiction: a neuroadaptational view relevant for diagnosis. Addiction 101:Suppl. 123–30 [Google Scholar]
  134. Koob GF, Le Moal M. 2008. Addiction and the brain antireward system. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59:29–53 [Google Scholar]
  135. Kowal BP, Yi R, Erisman AC, Bickel WK. 2007. A comparison of two algorithms in computerized temporal discounting procedures. Behav. Process. 75:231–36 [Google Scholar]
  136. Krabbendam L, Aleman A. 2003. Cognitive rehabilitation in schizophrenia: a quantitative analysis of controlled studies. Psychopharmacology 169:376–82 [Google Scholar]
  137. Lagorio CH, Madden GJ. 2005. Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards III: steady-state assessments, forced-choice trials, and all real rewards. Behav. Process. 69:173 [Google Scholar]
  138. Lando HA. 1977. Successful treatment of smokers with a broad-spectrum behavioral approach. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 45:361–66 [Google Scholar]
  139. Lawyer SR, Williams SA, Prihodova T, Rollins JD, Lester AC. 2010. Probability and delay discounting of hypothetical sexual outcomes. Behav. Process. 84:687–92 [Google Scholar]
  140. Liao W, Luo X, Le CT, Chu H, Epstein LH. et al. 2013. Analysis of cigarette purchase task instrument data with a left-censored mixed effects model. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 21:124–32 [Google Scholar]
  141. Lubman DI, Yucel M, Kettle JW, Scaffidi A, Mackenzie T. et al. 2009. Responsiveness to drug cues and natural rewards in opiate addiction: associations with later heroin use. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 66:205–12 [Google Scholar]
  142. Luczak SE, Glatt SJ, Wall TL. 2006. Meta-analyses of ALDH2 and ADH1B with alcohol dependence in Asians. Psychol. Bull. 132:607–21 [Google Scholar]
  143. Lundahl BW, Kunz C, Brownell C, Tollefson D, Burke BL. 2010. A meta-analysis of motivational interviewing: twenty-five years of empirical studies. Res. Soc. Work Pract. 20:137–60 [Google Scholar]
  144. MacKillop J. 2013. Integrating behavioral economics and behavioral genetics: delayed reward discounting as an endophenotype for addictive disorders. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 99:14–31 [Google Scholar]
  145. MacKillop J, Amlung MT, Few LR, Ray LA, Sweet LH, Munafo MR. 2011. Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology 216:305–21 [Google Scholar]
  146. MacKillop J, Amlung MT, Wier LM, David SP, Ray LA. et al. 2012a. The neuroeconomics of nicotine dependence: a preliminary functional magnetic resonance imaging study of delay discounting of monetary and cigarette rewards in smokers. Psychiatry Res. 202:20–29 [Google Scholar]
  147. MacKillop J, Brown CL, Stojek MK, Murphy CM, Sweet L, Niaura RS. 2012b. Behavioral economic analysis of withdrawal- and cue-elicited craving for tobacco: an initial investigation. Nicotine Tob. Res. 14:1426–34 [Google Scholar]
  148. MacKillop J, Kahler CW. 2009. Delayed reward discounting predicts treatment response for heavy drinkers receiving smoking cessation treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 104:197–203 [Google Scholar]
  149. MacKillop J, Miranda R, Monti PM. et al. 2010a. Alcohol demand, delayed reward discounting, and craving in relation to drinking and alcohol use disorders. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 119:106–14 [Google Scholar]
  150. MacKillop J, Murphy JG. 2007. A behavioral economic measure of demand for alcohol predicts brief intervention outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 89:227–33 [Google Scholar]
  151. MacKillop J, Murphy JG, Ray LA, Eisenberg DTA, Lisman SA. et al. 2008. Further validation of a cigarette purchase task for assessing the relative reinforcing efficacy of nicotine in college smokers. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 16:57–65 [Google Scholar]
  152. MacKillop J, O'Hagen S, Lisman SA, Murphy JG, Ray LA. et al. 2010b. Behavioral economic analysis of cue-elicited craving for alcohol. Addiction 105:1599–607 [Google Scholar]
  153. MacKillop J, Obasi E, Amlung MT, McGeary JE, Knopik VS. 2010c. The role of genetics in nicotine dependence: mapping the pathways from genome to syndrome. Curr. Cardiovasc. Risk Rep. 4:446–53 [Google Scholar]
  154. MacKillop J, Tidey JW. 2011. Cigarette demand and delayed reward discounting in nicotine-dependent individuals with schizophrenia and controls: an initial study. Psychopharmacology 216:91–99 [Google Scholar]
  155. Madden GJ, Begotka AM, Raiff BR, Kastern LL. 2003. Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 11:139–45 [Google Scholar]
  156. Madden GJ, Bickel WK. 2009. Impulsivity: The Behavioral and Neurological Science of Discounting Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
  157. Madden GJ, Petry NM, Badger GJ, Bickel WK. 1997. Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control participants: drug and monetary rewards. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 5:256–62 [Google Scholar]
  158. Madden GJ, Raiff BR, Laforio CH, Begotka AM, Mueller AM. et al. 2004. Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards: II. Between- and within-subject comparisons. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 12:251–56 [Google Scholar]
  159. Marusich JA, Bardo MT. 2009. Differences in impulsivity on a delay-discounting task predict self-administration of a low unit dose of methylphenidate in rats. Behav. Pharmacol. 20:447–54 [Google Scholar]
  160. Mazur JE. 1987. An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. Behavior ML Commons, JE Mazur, JA Nevin, H Rachlin 55–73 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  161. Mazur JE, Logue AW. 1978. Choice in a “self-control” paradigm: effects of a fading procedure. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 30:11–17 [Google Scholar]
  162. McClure EA, Vandrey RG, Johnson MW, Stitzer ML. 2013. Effects of varenicline on abstinence and smoking reward following a programmed lapse. Nicotine Tob. Res. 15:139–48 [Google Scholar]
  163. McClure SM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD. 2004. Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 306:503–7 [Google Scholar]
  164. Mendez IA, Simon NW, Hart N, Mitchell MR, Nation JR. et al. 2010. Self-administered cocaine causes long-lasting increases in impulsive choice in a delay discounting task. Behav. Neurosci. 124:470–77 [Google Scholar]
  165. Miller WR, Rollnick S. 2012. Meeting in the middle: motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 9:25 [Google Scholar]
  166. Mischel W, Ebbesen EB, Zeiss AR. 1972. Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 21:204–18 [Google Scholar]
  167. Mischel W, Shoda Y, Rodriguez MI. 1989. Delay of gratification in children. Science 244:933–38 [Google Scholar]
  168. Mitchell JM, Fields HL, D'Esposito M, Boettiger CA. 2005. Impulsive responding in alcoholics. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 29:2158–69 [Google Scholar]
  169. Mitchell SH. 1999. Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and nonsmokers. Psychopharmacology 146:455–64 [Google Scholar]
  170. Mitchell SH. 2004. Effects of short-term nicotine deprivation on decision-making: delay, uncertainty, and effort discounting. Nicotine Tob. Res. 6:819–28 [Google Scholar]
  171. Monterosso JR, Ainslie G, Xu J, Cordova X, Domier CP, London ED. 2007. Frontoparietal cortical activity of methamphetamine-dependent and comparison subjects performing a delay discounting task. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28:383–93 [Google Scholar]
  172. Murphy JG, Correia CJ, Colby SM, Vuchinich RE. 2005. Using behavioral theories of choice to predict drinking outcomes following a brief intervention. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 13:93–101 [Google Scholar]
  173. Murphy JG, Dennhardt AA, Skidmore JR, Borsari B, Barnett NP. et al. 2012. A randomized controlled trial of a behavioral economic supplement to brief motivational interventions for college drinking. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 80:876–86 [Google Scholar]
  174. Murphy JG, MacKillop J. 2006. Relative reinforcing efficacy of alcohol among college student drinkers. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 14:219–27 [Google Scholar]
  175. Murphy JG, MacKillop J, Skidmore JR, Pederson AA. 2009. Reliability and validity of a demand curve measure of alcohol reinforcement. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 17:396–404 [Google Scholar]
  176. Murphy JG, MacKillop J, Tidey JW, Brazil LA, Colby SM. 2011. Validity of a demand curve measure of nicotine reinforcement with adolescent smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 113:207–14 [Google Scholar]
  177. Murphy JG, Yurasek AM, Dennhardt AA, Skidmore JR, McDevitt-Murphy ME. et al. 2013. Symptoms of depression and PTSD are associated with elevated alcohol demand. Drug Alcohol Depend. 127:129–36 [Google Scholar]
  178. Nader MA, Woolverton WL. 1991. Effects of increasing the magnitude of an alternative reinforcer on drug choice in a discrete-trials choice procedure. Psychopharmacology 105:169–74 [Google Scholar]
  179. O'Brien CP. 1997. A range of research-based pharmacotherapies for addiction. Science 278:66–70 [Google Scholar]
  180. Odum AL. 2011. Delay discounting: trait variable?. Behav. Process. 87:1–9 [Google Scholar]
  181. Odum AL, Madden GJ, Badger GJ, Bickel WK. 2000. Needle sharing in opioid-dependent outpatients: psychological processes underlying risk. Drug Alcohol Depend. 60:259–66 [Google Scholar]
  182. Ohmura Y, Takahashi T, Kitamura N. 2005. Discounting delayed and probabilistic monetary gains and losses by smokers of cigarettes. Psychopharmacology 182:508–15 [Google Scholar]
  183. Ohmura Y, Takahashi T, Kitamura N, Wehr P. 2006. Three-month stability of delay and probability discounting measures. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 14:318–28 [Google Scholar]
  184. Olmstead TA, Cohen JP, Petry NM. 2012. Health-care service utilization in substance abusers receiving contingency management and standard care treatments. Addiction 107:1462–70 [Google Scholar]
  185. Olmstead TA, Petry NM. 2009. The cost-effectiveness of prize-based and voucher-based contingency management in a population of cocaine- or opioid-dependent outpatients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 102:108–15 [Google Scholar]
  186. Oslin DW, Berrettini W, Kranzler HR, Pettinati H, Gelernter J. et al. 2003. A functional polymorphism of the μ-opioid receptor gene is associated with naltrexone response in alcohol-dependent patients. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:1546–52 [Google Scholar]
  187. Paloyelis Y, Asherson P, Mehta MA, Faraone SV, Kuntsi J. 2010. DAT1 and COMT effects on delay discounting and trait impulsivity in male adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and healthy controls. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:2414–26 [Google Scholar]
  188. Paxton R. 1980. The effects of a deposit contract as a component in a behavioural programme for stopping smoking. Behav. Res. Ther. 18:45–50 [Google Scholar]
  189. Paxton R. 1981. Deposit contracts with smokers: varying frequency and amount of repayments. Behav. Res. Ther. 19:117–23 [Google Scholar]
  190. Paxton R. 1983. Prolonging the effects of deposit contracts with smokers. Behav. Res. Ther. 21:425–33 [Google Scholar]
  191. Perry JL, Larson EB, German JP, Madden GJ, Carroll ME. 2005. Impulsivity (delay discounting) as a predictor of acquisition of IV cocaine self-administration in female rats. Psychopharmacology 178:193–201 [Google Scholar]
  192. Perry JL, Nelson SE, Anderson MM, Morgan AD, Carroll ME. 2007. Impulsivity (delay discounting) for food and cocaine in male and female rats selectively bred for high and low saccharin intake. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 86:822–37 [Google Scholar]
  193. Petry NM. 2001. Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls. Psychopharmacology 154:243–50 [Google Scholar]
  194. Petry NM, Alessi SM, Hanson T, Sierra S. 2007. Randomized trial of contingent prizes versus vouchers in cocaine-using methadone patients. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 75:983–91 [Google Scholar]
  195. Petry NM, Alessi SM, Rash CJ. 2013. Contingency management treatments decrease psychiatric symptoms. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 81:926–31 [Google Scholar]
  196. Petry NM, Martin B, Cooney JL, Kranzler HR. 2000. Give them prizes, and they will come: contingency management for treatment of alcohol dependence. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 68:250–57 [Google Scholar]
  197. Powers MB, Vedel E, Emmelkamp PM. 2008. Behavioral couples therapy (BCT) for alcohol and drug use disorders: a meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 28:952–62 [Google Scholar]
  198. Rachlin H. 1997. Four teleological theories of addiction. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 4:462–73 [Google Scholar]
  199. Rachlin H. 2006. Notes on discounting. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 85:425–35 [Google Scholar]
  200. Rachlin H, Green L. 1972. Commitment, choice, and self-control. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 17:15–72 [Google Scholar]
  201. Rachlin H, Raineri A, Cross D. 1991. Subjective probability and delay. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 55:233–44 [Google Scholar]
  202. Ray LA, Chin PF, Miotto K. 2010. Naltrexone for the treatment of alcoholism: clinical findings, mechanisms of action, and pharmacogenetics. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 9:13–22 [Google Scholar]
  203. Ray LA, Hutchison KE. 2004. A polymorphism of the μ-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) and sensitivity to the effects of alcohol in humans. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 28:1789–95 [Google Scholar]
  204. Ray LA, Hutchison KE. 2007. Effects of naltrexone on alcohol sensitivity and genetic moderators of medication response: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 64:1069–77 [Google Scholar]
  205. Reynolds B. 2004. Do high rates of cigarette consumption increase delay discounting? A cross-sectional comparison of adolescent smokers and young-adult smokers and nonsmokers. Behav. Process. 67:545–49 [Google Scholar]
  206. Reynolds B. 2006a. A review of delay-discounting research with humans: relations to drug use and gambling. Behav. Pharmacol. 17:651–67 [Google Scholar]
  207. Reynolds B. 2006b. The Experiential Discounting Task is sensitive to cigarette-smoking status and correlates with a measure of delay discounting. Behav. Pharmacol. 17:133–42 [Google Scholar]
  208. Reynolds B, Karraker K, Horn K, Richards JB. 2003. Delay and probability discounting as related to different stages of adolescent smoking and non-smoking. Behav. Process. 64:333–44 [Google Scholar]
  209. Reynolds B, Richards JB, Horn K, Karraker K. 2004. Delay discounting and probability discounting as related to cigarette smoking status in adults. Behav. Process. 30:35–42 [Google Scholar]
  210. Reynolds EK, Magidson JF, Bornovalova MA, Gwadz M, Ewart CK. et al. 2010. Application of the social action theory to understand factors associated with risky sexual behavior among individuals in residential substance abuse treatment. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 24:311–21 [Google Scholar]
  211. Robinson ES, Eagle DM, Mar AC, Bari A, Banerjee G. et al. 2008. Similar effects of the selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine on three distinct forms of impulsivity in the rat. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:1028–37 [Google Scholar]
  212. Roesch MR, Takahashi Y, Gugsa N, Bissonette GB, Schoenbaum G. 2007. Previous cocaine exposure makes rats hypersensitive to both delay and reward magnitude. J. Neurosci. 27:245–50 [Google Scholar]
  213. Rogers RE, Higgins ST, Silverman K, Thomas CS, Badger GJ. et al. 2008. Abstinence-contingent reinforcement and engagement in non-drug-related activities among illicit drug abusers. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 22:544–50 [Google Scholar]
  214. Rollins BY, Dearing KK, Epstein LH. 2010. Delay discounting moderates the effect of food reinforcement on energy intake among non-obese women. Appetite 55:420–25 [Google Scholar]
  215. Roozen HG, Kerkhof AJ, van den Brink W. 2003. Experiences with an outpatient relapse program (community reinforcement approach) combined with naltrexone in the treatment of opioid-dependence: effect on addictive behaviors and the predictive value of psychiatric comorbidity. Eur. Addict. Res. 9:53–58 [Google Scholar]
  216. Roozen HG, Van Beers SE, Weevers HJ, Breteler MH, Willemsen MC. et al. 2006. Effects on smoking cessation: naltrexone combined with a cognitive behavioral treatment based on the community reinforcement approach. Subst. Use Misuse 41:45–60 [Google Scholar]
  217. Saelens BE, Epstein LH. 1996. Reinforcing value of food in obese and non-obese women. Appetite 27:41–50 [Google Scholar]
  218. Samuelson P. 1937. A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econ. Stud. 4:155–61 [Google Scholar]
  219. Schweitzer JB, Sulzer-Azaroff B. 1995. Self-control in boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: effects of added stimulation and time. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 36:671–86 [Google Scholar]
  220. Shamosh NA, DeYoung CG, Green AE, Reis DL, Johnson MR. et al. 2008. Individual differences in delay discounting: relation to intelligence, working memory, and anterior prefrontal cortex. Psychol. Sci. 19:904–11 [Google Scholar]
  221. Sheffer C, MacKillop J, McGeary J, Landes RD, Carter L. et al. 2012. Delay discounting, locus of control, and cognitive impulsiveness independently predict tobacco dependence treatment outcomes in a highly dependent, lower socioeconomic group of smokers. Am. J. Addict. 21:221–32 [Google Scholar]
  222. Siegel E, Rachlin H. 1995. Soft commitment: self-control achieved by response persistence. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 64:117–28 [Google Scholar]
  223. Silverman K, Higgins ST, Brooner RK, Montoya ID. 1996. Sustained cocaine abstinence in methadone maintenance patients through voucher based reinforcement therapy. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 53:409–15 [Google Scholar]
  224. Silverman K, Svikis D, Robles E, Stitzer ML, Bigelow GE. 2001. A reinforcement-based therapeutic workplace for the treatment of drug abuse: six-month abstinence outcomes. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 9:14–23 [Google Scholar]
  225. Silverman K, Svikis D, Wong CJ, Hampton J, Stitzer ML, Bigelow GE. 2002. A reinforcement-based therapeutic workplace for the treatment of drug abuse: three-year abstinence outcomes. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 10:228–40 [Google Scholar]
  226. Simon NW, Mendez IA, Setlow B. 2007. Cocaine exposure causes long-term increases in impulsive choice. Behav. Neurosci. 121:543–49 [Google Scholar]
  227. Sindelar J, Elbel B, Petry NM. 2007. What do we get for our money? Cost-effectiveness of adding contingency management. Addiction 102:309–16 [Google Scholar]
  228. Singh NN, Leung JP. 1988. Smoking cessation through cigarette-fading, self-recording, and contracting: treatment, maintenance and long-term followup. Addict Behav. 13:101–5 [Google Scholar]
  229. Skidmore JR, Murphy JG. 2011. The effect of drink price and next-day responsibilities on college student drinking: a behavioral economic analysis. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 25:57–68 [Google Scholar]
  230. Smith AE, Martens MP, Murphy JG, Buscemi J, Yurasek AM, Skidmore J. 2010. Reinforcing efficacy moderates the relationship between impulsivity-related traits and alcohol use. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 18:521–29 [Google Scholar]
  231. Smith JE, Meyers RJ, Delaney HD. 1998. The community reinforcement approach with homeless alcohol-dependent individuals. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 66:541–48 [Google Scholar]
  232. Solanto MV, Abikoff H, Sonuga-Barke E, Schachar R, Logan GD. et al. 2001. The ecological validity of delay aversion and response inhibition as measures of impulsivity in AD/HD: a supplement to the NIMH multimodal treatment study of AD/HD. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 29:215–28 [Google Scholar]
  233. Sonuga-Barke EJ, Taylor E, Sembi S, Smith J. 1992. Hyperactivity and delay aversion: I. The effect of delay on choice. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Discipl. 33:387–98 [Google Scholar]
  234. Sonuga-Barke EJ, Williams E, Hall M, Saxton T. 1996. Hyperactivity and delay aversion. III: The effect on cognitive style of imposing delay after errors. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry Allied Discipl. 37:189–94 [Google Scholar]
  235. Stanger C, Ryan SR, Fu H, Landes RD, Jones BA. et al. 2012. Delay discounting predicts adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 20:205–12 [Google Scholar]
  236. Stein LA, Lebeau R, Colby SM, Barnett NP, Golembeske C, Monti PM. 2011. Motivational interviewing for incarcerated adolescents: effects of depressive symptoms on reducing alcohol and marijuana use after release. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 72:497–506 [Google Scholar]
  237. Stitzer ML, Petry N, Peirce J, Kirby K, Killeen T. et al. 2007. Effectiveness of abstinence-based incentives: interaction with intake stimulant test results. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 75:805–11 [Google Scholar]
  238. Sun H, Cocker PJ, Zeeb FD, Winstanley CA. 2012. Chronic atomoxetine treatment during adolescence decreases impulsive choice, but not impulsive action, in adult rats and alters markers of synaptic plasticity in the orbitofrontal cortex. Psychopharmacology 219:285–301 [Google Scholar]
  239. Sweitzer MM, Donny EC, Dierker LC, Flory JD, Manuck SB. 2008. Delay discounting and smoking: association with the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence but not cigarettes smoked per day. Nicotine Tob. Res. 10:1571–75 [Google Scholar]
  240. Takahashi T, Furukawa A, Miyakawa T, Maesato H, Higuchi S. 2007. Two-month stability of hyperbolic discount rates for delayed monetary gains in abstinent inpatient alcoholics. Neuroendocrinol. Lett. 28:131–36 [Google Scholar]
  241. Takahashi T, Ohmura Y, Oono H, Radford M. 2009. Alcohol use and discounting of delayed and probabilistic gain and loss. Neuroendocrinol. Lett. 30:749–52 [Google Scholar]
  242. Temple JL, Legierski CM, Giacomelli AM, Salvy SJ, Epstein LH. 2008. Overweight children find food more reinforcing and consume more energy than do nonoverweight children. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 87:1121–27 [Google Scholar]
  243. Thaler R. 1981. Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econ. Lett. 8:201–7 [Google Scholar]
  244. Torregrossa MM, Xie M, Taylor JR. 2012. Chronic corticosterone exposure during adolescence reduces impulsive action but increases impulsive choice and sensitivity to yohimbine in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 37:1656–70 [Google Scholar]
  245. Tucker JA, Foushee HR, Black BC. 2008. Behavioral economic analysis of natural resolution of drinking problems using IVR self-monitoring. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 16:332–40 [Google Scholar]
  246. Tucker JA, Vuchinich RE, Black BC, Rippens PD. 2006. Significance of a behavioral economic index of reward value in predicting drinking problem resolution. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 74:317–26 [Google Scholar]
  247. Tucker JA, Vuchinich RE, Rippens PD. 2002. Predicting natural resolution of alcohol-related problems: a prospective behavioral economic analysis. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 10:248–57 [Google Scholar]
  248. Twamley EW, Jeste DV, Bellack AS. 2003. A review of cognitive training in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 29:359–82 [Google Scholar]
  249. Van Etten ML, Higgins ST, Budney AJ, Badger GJ. 1998. Comparison of the frequency and enjoyability of pleasant events in cocaine abusers versus non-abusers using a standardized behavioral inventory. Addiction 93:1669–80 [Google Scholar]
  250. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Tomasi D. 2012. Addiction circuitry in the human brain. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 52:321–36 [Google Scholar]
  251. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Ma Y, Fowler JS, Zhu W. et al. 2003. Expectation enhances the regional brain metabolic and the reinforcing effects of stimulants in cocaine abusers. J. Neurosci. 23:11461–68 [Google Scholar]
  252. Volpp KG, John LK, Troxel AB, Norton L, Fassbender J, Loewenstein G. 2008. Financial incentive-based approaches for weight loss: a randomized trial. JAMA 300:2631–37 [Google Scholar]
  253. Vuchinich RE. 1995. Alcohol abuse as molar choice: an update of a 1982 proposal. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 9:223–35 [Google Scholar]
  254. Vuchinich RE, Heather BN. 2003. Choice, Behavioral Economics, and Addiction Oxford, UK: Elsevier
  255. Vuchinich RE, Simpson CA. 1998. Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 6:292–305 [Google Scholar]
  256. Vuchinich RE, Tucker JA. 1988. Contributions from behavioral theories of choice to an analysis of alcohol abuse. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 97:181–95 [Google Scholar]
  257. Vuchinich RE, Tucker JA. 1996. Alcoholic relapse, life events, and behavioral theories of choice: A prospective analysis. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 4:19–28 [Google Scholar]
  258. Wade-Galuska T, Galuska CM, Winger G. 2011. Effects of daily morphine administration and deprivation on choice and demand for remifentanil and cocaine in rhesus monkeys. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 95:75–89 [Google Scholar]
  259. Wagenaar AC, Tobler AL, Komro KA. 2010. Effects of alcohol tax and price policies on morbidity and mortality: a systematic review. Am. J. Public Health 100:2270–78 [Google Scholar]
  260. Wahlstrom LC, McChargue DE, Mackillop J. 2012. DRD2/ANKK1 TaqI A genotype moderates the relationship between alexithymia and the relative value of alcohol among male college binge drinkers. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 102:471–76 [Google Scholar]
  261. Washio Y, Higgins ST, Heil SH, McKerchar TL, Badger GJ. et al. 2011. Delay discounting is associated with treatment response among cocaine-dependent outpatients. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 19:243–48 [Google Scholar]
  262. Weitzman ER, Kawachi I. 2000. Giving means receiving: the protective effect of social capital on binge drinking on college campuses. Am. J. Public Health 90:1936–39 [Google Scholar]
  263. White MJ, Morris CP, Lawford BR, Young RM. 2008. Behavioral phenotypes of impulsivity related to the ANKK1 gene are independent of an acute stressor. Behav. Brain Funct. 4:54 [Google Scholar]
  264. Winett RA. 1973. Parameters of deposit contracts in the modification of smoking. Psychol. Rec. 23:49–60 [Google Scholar]
  265. Winger G, Galuska CM, Hursh SR, Woods JH. 2006. Relative reinforcing effects of cocaine, remifentanil, and their combination in rhesus monkeys. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 318:223–29 [Google Scholar]
  266. Winstanley CA, Eagle DM, Robbins TW. 2006. Behavioral models of impulsivity in relation to ADHD: translation between clinical and preclinical studies. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 26:379–95 [Google Scholar]
  267. Yankelevitz RL, Mitchell SH, Zhang Y. 2012. Gender differences in factors associated with alcohol drinking: delay discounting and perception of others' drinking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 123:273–76 [Google Scholar]
  268. Yi R, Carter AE, Landes RD. 2012. Restricted psychological horizon in active methamphetamine users: future, past, probability, and social discounting. Behav. Pharmacol. 23:358–66 [Google Scholar]
  269. Yi R, Charlton S, Porter C, Carter AE, Bickel WK. 2011a. Future altruism: social discounting of delayed rewards. Behav. Process. 86:160–63 [Google Scholar]
  270. Yi R, Chase WD, Bickel WK. 2007. Probability discounting among cigarette smokers and nonsmokers: molecular analysis discerns group differences. Behav. Pharmacol. 18:633–39 [Google Scholar]
  271. Yi R, de la Piedad X, Bickel WK. 2006. The combined effects of delay and probability in discounting. Behav. Process. 73:149–55 [Google Scholar]
  272. Yi R, Johnson MW, Giordano LA, Landes RD, Badger GJ, Bickel WK. 2008. The effects of reduced cigarette smoking on discounting future rewards: an initial evaluation. Psychol. Rec. 58:163–74 [Google Scholar]
  273. Yi R, King LF, Carter AE, Landes RD, Bickel WK. 2011b. Intertemporal decision-making for a group. Psychol. Rec. 60:3 [Google Scholar]
  274. Yi R, Landes RD. 2012. Temporal and probability discounting by cigarette smokers following acute smoking abstinence. Nicotine Tob. Res. 14:547–58 [Google Scholar]
  275. Yi R, Landes RD, Bickel WK. 2009. Novel models of intertemporal valuation: past and future outcomes. J. Neurosci. Psychol. Econ. 2:102–11 [Google Scholar]
  276. Yoon JH, Higgins ST, Bradstreet MP, Badger GJ, Thomas CS. 2009. Changes in the relative reinforcing effects of cigarette smoking as a function of initial abstinence. Psychopharmacology 205:305–18 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153724
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153724
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error