1932

Abstract

Empirical publications inspired by the network approach to psychopathology have increased exponentially in the twenty-first century. The central idea that an episode of mental disorder arises from causal interactions among its symptomatic elements has especially resonated with those clinical scientists whose disenchantment with traditional categorical and dimensional approaches to mental illness has become all too apparent. As the field has matured, conceptual and statistical concerns about the limitations of network approaches to psychopathology have emerged, inspiring the development of novel methods to address these concerns. Rather than reviewing the vast empirical literature, I focus instead on the issues and controversies regarding this approach and sketch directions where the field might go next.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-092850
2021-05-07
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/clinpsy/17/1/annurev-clinpsy-081219-092850.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-092850&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aalbers G, McNally RJ, Heeren A, de Wit S, Fried EI 2019. Social media and depression symptoms: a network perspective. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 148:1454–62
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Adolf JK, Fried EI. 2019. Ergodicity is sufficient but not necessary for group-to-individual generalizability. PNAS 116:6540–41
    [Google Scholar]
  3. APA (Am. Psychiatr. Assoc.) 1980. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Arlington, VA: Am. Psychiatr. Publ. , 3rd. ed. [DSM-III]
  4. APA (Am. Psychiatr. Assoc.) 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Arlington, VA: Am. Psychiatr. Publ. , 5th. ed.
  5. Beard C, Millner AJ, Forgeard MJC, Fried EI, Hsu KJ et al. 2016. Network analysis of depression and anxiety symptom relationships in a psychiatric sample. Psychol. Med. 46:3359–69
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bellet BW, Jones PJ, Neimeyer RA, McNally RJ 2018. Bereavement outcomes as causal systems: a network analysis of the co-occurrence of complicated grief and posttraumatic growth. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 6:797–809
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blaauw FJ, van der Krieke L, Emercencia AC, Aiello M, de Jonge P 2017. Personalized advice for enhancing well-being using automated impulse response analysis—AIRA. arXiv:1706.09268 [cs.CY]
  8. Blanken TF, Borsboom D, Penninx BWJH, Van Someren EJW 2020. Network outcome analysis identifies difficulty initiating sleep as a primary target for prevention of depression: a 6-year prospective study. Sleep 43:5zsz288
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Borgatti SP. 2005. Centrality and network flow. Soc. Netw. 27:55–71
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Borsboom D. 2008. Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems. J. Clin. Psychol. 64:1089–108
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Borsboom D. 2017. A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry 16:5–13
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Borsboom D, Cramer AOJ. 2013. Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 9:91–121
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Borsboom D, Cramer AOJ, Kalis A 2019. Brain disorders? Not really: why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research. Behav. Brain Sci. 42:e2
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Borsboom D, Fried EI, Epskamp S, Waldorp LJ, van Borkulo CD et al. 2017. False alarm? A comprehensive reanalysis of “Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability” by Forbes, Wright, Markon, and Krueger 2017. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 126:989–99
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Borsboom D, Mellenbergh GJ, van Heerden J 2003. The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychol. Rev. 110:203–19
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bos EH, De Jonge P 2014. “Critical slowing down in depression” is a great idea that still needs empirical proof. PNAS 111:E878
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bos EH, Wanders RBK. 2016. Group-level symptom networks in depression. JAMA Psychiatry 73:411
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bos FM, Blaauw FJ, Snippe E, van der Krieke L, de Jonge P, Wichers M 2018. Exploring the emotional dynamics of subclinically depressed individuals with and without anhedonia: an experience sampling study. J. Affect. Disord. 228:186–93
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bos FM, Snippe E, de Vos S, Hartmann JA, Simons CJP, Wichers M 2017. Can we jump from cross-sectional to dynamic interpretations of networks? Implications for the network perspective in psychiatry. Psychother. Psychosom. 86:175–77
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Boschloo L, Schoevers RA, van Borkulo CD, Borsboom D, Oldehinkel AJ 2016a. The network structure of psychopathology in a community sample of preadolescents. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 125:599–606
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Boschloo L, van Borkulo CD, Borsboom D, Schoevers RA 2016b. A prospective study of how symptoms in a network predict the onset of depression. Psychother. Psychosom. 85:183–84
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Bringmann LF, Elmer T, Epskamp S, Krause RW, Schoch D et al. 2019. What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks. ? J. Abnorm. Psychol. 128:892–903
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Bringmann LF, Eronen MI. 2018. Don't blame the model: reconsidering the network approach to psychopathology. Psychol. Rev. 125:606–15
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Bringmann LF, Lemmens LHJM, Huibers MJH, Borsboom D, Tuerlinckx F 2015. Revealing the dynamic network structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Psychol. Med. 45:747–57
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Bringmann LF, Vissers N, Wichers M, Geschwind N, Kuppens P, Tuerlinckx F 2013. A network approach to psychopathology: new insights into clinical longitudinal data. PLOS ONE 8:4e60188
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Caspi A, Houts RM, Belsky DW, Goldman-Mellor SJ, Harrington H et al. 2014. The p factor: one general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 2:119–37
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen J, Chen Z. 2008. Extended Bayesian information criteria for model selection with large model spaces. Biometrika 95:759–71
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Clark DM. 1986. A cognitive approach to panic. Behav. Res. Ther. 24:461–70
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Contreras A, Nieto I, Valiente C, Espinosa R, Vazquez C 2019. The study of psychopathology from the network perspective: a systematic review. Psychother. Psychosom. 88:71–83
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Cramer AOJ, Borsboom D, Aggen SH, Kendler KS 2012. The pathoplasticity of dysphoric episodes: differential impact of stressful life events on the pattern of depressive symptom inter-correlations. Psychol. Med. 42:957–65
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Cramer AOJ, van Borkulo CD, Giltay EJ, van der Maas HLJ, Kendler KS et al. 2016. Major depression as a complex dynamic system. PLOS ONE 11:12e0167490
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Cramer AOJ, Waldorp LJ, van der Maas HLJ, Borsboom D 2010a. Comorbidity: a network perspective. Behav. Brain Sci. 33:137–50
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Cramer AOJ, Waldorp LJ, van der Maas HLJ, Borsboom D 2010b. Complex realities require complex theories: refining and extending the network approach to mental disorders. Behav. Brain Sci. 33:178–93
    [Google Scholar]
  34. de Ron J, Fried EI, Epskamp S 2021. Psychological networks in clinical populations: investigating the consequences of Berkson's bias. Psychol. Med. 51:16876
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Dückers MLA, Alisic E, Brewin CR 2016. A vulnerability paradox in the cross-national prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder. Br. J. Psychiatry 209:300–5
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Elliott H, Jones PJ, Schmidt U 2020a. Central symptoms predict posttreatment outcomes and clinical impairment in anorexia nervosa: a network analysis. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 8:139–54
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Elliott H, Jones PJ, Schmidt U 2020b. Corrigendum: Central symptoms predict posttreatment outcomes and clinical impairment in anorexia nervosa: a network analysis. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 8:388–89
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Epskamp S. 2020. Psychometric network models from time-series and panel data. Psychometrika 85:206–31
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Epskamp S, Borsboom D, Fried EI 2018a. Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: a tutorial paper. Behav. Res. Methods 50:195–212
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Epskamp S, Cramer AOJ, Waldorp LJ, Schmittmann VD, Borsboom D 2012. qgraph: network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. J. Stat. Softw. 48:i04
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Epskamp S, Fried EI. 2018. A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychol. Meth. 23:617–34
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Epskamp S, van Borkulo CD, van der Veen DC, Servaas MN, Isvoranu AM, Cramer AOJ 2018b. Personalized network modeling in psychopathology: the importance of contemporaneous and temporal connections. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 6:416–27
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Everett MG, Borgatti SP. 2014. Networks containing negative ties. Soc. Netw. 38:111–20
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Fisher AJ, Medaglia JD, Jeronimus BF 2018. Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research. PNAS 115:E6106–15
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Fisher AJ, Reeves JW, Lawyer G, Medaglia JD, Rubel JA 2017. Exploring the idiographic dynamics of mood and anxiety via network analysis. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 126:1044–56
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Forbes MK, Wright AGC, Markon KE, Krueger RF 2017. Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 126:969–88
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Forbes MK, Wright AGC, Markon KE, Krueger RF 2019. Quantifying the reliability and replicability of psychopathology network characteristics. Multivar. Behav. Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1616526
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  48. Frances A. 2014. ICD, DSM and the Tower of Babel. Aust. N.Z. J. Psychiatry 48:371–77
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Frances A, Nardo JM. 2013. ICD-11 should not repeat the mistakes made by DSM-5. Br. J. Psychiatry 203:1–2
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Freeman LC 1978–1979. Centrality in social networks. Soc. Netw. 1:215–39
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Freud S. 1973 (1924). A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis J Riviere New York: Pocket Books
  52. Fried EI, Cramer AOJ. 2017. Moving forward: challenges and directions for psychopathological network theory and methodology. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 12:999–1020
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Fried EI, Eidhof MB, Palic S, Costantini G, Huisman-van Dijk HM, Karstoft KI 2018. Replicability and generalizability of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) networks: a cross-cultural multisite study of PTSD symptoms in four trauma patient samples. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 6:335–51
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Fried EI, Nesse RM, Zivin K, Guille C, Sen S 2014. Depression is more than the sum score of its parts: individual DSM symptoms have different risk factors. Psychol. Med. 44:2067–76
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Fried EI, van Borkulo CD, Cramer AOJ, Boschloo L, Schoevers RA, Borsboom D 2017. Mental disorders as networks of problems: a review of recent insights. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 52:1–10
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R 2008. Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics 9:432–41
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Galilei G. 2012 (1615). Observations on the Copernican theory. Selected Writings of Galileo Galilei WR Shea, M Davie 96–114 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  58. García-Velázquez R, Jokela M, Rosenström TM 2020. Direction of dependence between specific symptoms of depression: a non-Gaussian approach. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 8:240–51
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Grömping U. 2006. Relative importance for linear regression in R: the package relaimpo. J. Stat. Softw. 17:i01
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Guze SB. 1992. Why Psychiatry Is a Branch of Medicine Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  61. Hamaker EL. 2012. Why researchers should think “within-person”: a paradigmatic rationale. Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life MR Mehl, TS Conner 43–61 New York: Guilford
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Haslbeck JMB, Fried EI. 2017. How predictable are symptoms in psychopathological networks? A reanalysis of 18 published datasets. Psychol. Med. 47:2767–76
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Heeren A, Jones PJ, McNally RJ 2018. Mapping network connectivity among symptoms of social anxiety disorder and comorbid depression in people with social anxiety disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 228:75–82
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Heeren A, McNally RJ. 2016. An integrative network approach to social anxiety disorder: the complex dynamic interplay among attentional bias for threat, attentional control, and symptoms. J. Anxiety Disord. 42:95–104
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Heeren A, McNally RJ. 2018a. Social anxiety disorder as a densely interconnected network of fear and avoidance for social situations. Cogn. Ther. Res. 42:103–13
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Heeren A, McNally RJ. 2018b. Correction to: Social anxiety disorder as a densely interconnected network of fear and avoidance for social situations. Cogn. Ther. Res. 42:878–79
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Hoffart A, Johnson SU. 2020. Latent trait, latent-trait state, and a network approach to mental problems and their mechanisms of change. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 8:595–613
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Hofmann SG, Curtiss J, McNally RJ 2016. A complex network perspective on clinical science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11:597–605
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Hyman SE. 2010. The diagnosis of mental disorders: the problem of reification. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 6:155–79
    [Google Scholar]
  70. [Google Scholar]
  71. Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, Heinssen R, Pine DS et al. 2010. Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 167:748–51
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Isvoranu AM, van Borkulo CD, Boyette LL, Wigman JTW, Vinkers CH et al. 2017. A network approach to psychosis: pathways between childhood trauma and psychotic symptoms. Schizophr. Bull. 43:187–96
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Johnson JW, LeBreton JM. 2004. History and use of relative importance indices in organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 7:238–57
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Jones PJ. 2017. networktools: tools for identifying important nodes in networks. R Package Version 1.1.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=networktools
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Jones PJ, Ma R, McNally RJ 2019. Bridge centrality: a network approach to understanding comorbidity. Multivar. Behav. Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1614898
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  76. Jones PJ, Mair P, Riemann BC, Mugno BL, McNally RJ 2018. A network perspective on comorbid depression in adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J. Anxiety Disord. 53:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Jones PJ, Williams DR, McNally RJ 2020. Sampling variability is not nonreplication: a Bayesian reanalysis of Forbes, Wright, Markon, and Krueger. Multivar. Behav. Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2020.1797460
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. Kirk SA, Kutchins H. 1992. The Selling of DSM-III New York: Aldine de Gruyter
  79. Koenders MA, de Kleijn R, Giltay EJ, Elzinga BM, Spinhoven P, Spijker AT 2015. A network approach to bipolar symptomatology in patients with different course types. PLOS ONE 10:10e0141420
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Kotov R, Krueger RF, Watson D, Achenbach TM, Althoff RR et al. 2017. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): a dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 126:454–77
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Krueger RF, DeYoung CG, Markon KE 2010. Toward scientifically useful quantitative models of psychopathology: the importance of a comparative approach. Behav. Brain Sci. 33:163–64
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Lahey BB, Krueger RF, Rathouz PJ, Waldman ID, Zald DH 2017. A hierarchical causal taxonomy of psychopathology across the life span. Psychol. Bull. 143:142–86
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Lahey BB, Van Hulle CA, Singh AL, Waldman ID, Rathouz PJ 2011. Higher-order genetic and environmental structure of prevalent forms of child and adolescent psychopathology. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 68:181–89
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Lang PJ. 1968. Fear reduction and fear behavior: problems in treating a construct. Research in Psychotherapy, Vol. 3 JM Schlien 90–102 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Lang PJ, Lazovik D. 1963. Experimental desensitization of a phobia. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 66:519–25
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Levinson CA, Brosof LC, Vanzhula I, Christian C, Jones P et al. 2018. Social anxiety and eating disorder comorbidity and underlying vulnerabilities: using network analysis to conceptualize comorbidity. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 51:693–709
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Levinson CA, Zerwas S, Calebs B, Forbush K, Kordy H et al. 2017. The core symptoms of bulimia nervosa, anxiety, and depression: a network analysis. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 126:340–54
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Liebowitz MR. 1987. Social phobia. Mod. Probl. Pharmacopsychiatry 22:141–73
    [Google Scholar]
  89. MacCorquodale K, Meehl PE. 1948. On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychol. Rev. 55:95–107
    [Google Scholar]
  90. McNally RJ. 2011. What Is Mental Illness? Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  91. McNally RJ. 2016. Can network analysis transform psychopathology. ? Behav. Res. Ther. 86:95–104
    [Google Scholar]
  92. McNally RJ. 2018. Resolving the vulnerability paradox in the cross-national prevalence of PTSD. J. Anxiety Disord. 54:33–35
    [Google Scholar]
  93. McNally RJ. 2019. The network takeover reaches psychopathology. Behav. Brain Sci. 42:25–26
    [Google Scholar]
  94. McNally RJ, Heeren A, Robinaugh DJ 2017a. A Bayesian network analysis of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in adults reporting childhood sexual abuse. Eur. J. Psychotraumatol. 8:1341276
    [Google Scholar]
  95. McNally RJ, Mair P, Mugno BL, Riemann BC 2017b. Co-morbid obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression: a Bayesian network approach. Psychol. Med. 47:1204–14
    [Google Scholar]
  96. McNally RJ, Robinaugh DJ, Wu GWY, Wang L, Deserno M, Borsboom D 2015. Mental disorders as causal systems: a network approach to posttraumatic stress disorder. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 3:836–49
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Medaglia JD, Jeronimus BF, Fisher AJ 2019. Reply to Adolf and Fried: conditional equivalence and imperatives for person-level science. PNAS 116:6542–43
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Moffa G, Catone G, Kuipers J, Kuipers E, Freeman D, Bebbington P 2017. Using directed acyclic graphs in epidemiological research in psychosis: an analysis of the role of bullying in psychosis. Schizophr. Bull. 43:1273–79
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Molassiotis A, Lowe M, Blackhall F, Lorigan P 2011. A qualitative exploration of a respiratory distress symptom cluster in lung cancer: cough, breathlessness and fatigue. Lung Cancer 71:94–102
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Molenaar PCM. 2004. A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement 2:201–18
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Molenaar PCM, Campbell CG. 2009. The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 18:112–17
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Papini S, Rubin M, Telch MJ, Smits JAJ, Hien DA 2020. Pretreatment posttraumatic stress disorder symptom network metrics predict the strength of the association between node change and network change during treatment. J. Trauma Stress 33:64–71
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Pe ML, Kircanski K, Thompson RJ, Bringmann LF, Tuerlinckx F, Gotlib I 2015. Emotion-network density in major depressive disorder. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 3:292–300
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Pearl J, Mackenzie D. 2018. The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect New York: Basic Books
  105. Reeves JW, Fisher AJ. 2020. An examination of idiographic networks of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. J. Trauma Stress 33:84–95
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Regier DA, Narrow WE, Clarke DE, Kraemer HC, Kuramoto SJ et al. 2013. DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: test-retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses. Am. J. Psychiatry 170:59–70
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Rhemtulla M, Fried EI, Aggen SH, Tuerlinckx F, Kendler KS, Borsboom D 2016. Network analysis of substance abuse and dependence symptoms. Drug Alcohol Depend 161:230–37
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Robinaugh DJ, Haslbeck J, Waldorp L, Kossakowski JJ, Fried EI et al. 2019. Advancing the network theory of mental disorders: a computational model of panic disorder. PsyArXiv km37w. http://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/km37w
    [Crossref]
  109. Robinaugh DJ, Hoekstra RHA, Toner ER, Borsboom D 2020. The network approach to psychopathology: a review of the literature 2008–2018 and an agenda for future research. Psychol. Med. 50:353–66
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Robinaugh DJ, LeBlanc NJ, Vuletich HJ, McNally RJ 2014. Network analysis of persistent complex bereavement disorder in conjugally bereaved adults. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 123:510–22
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Robinaugh DJ, Millner AJ, McNally RJ 2016. Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 125:747–57
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Robinson WS. 1950. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. Am. Sociol. Rev. 15:351–57
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Rodebaugh TL, Tonge NA, Piccirillo ML, Fried E, Horenstein A et al. 2018. Does centrality in a cross-sectional network suggest intervention targets for social anxiety disorder. ? J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 86:831–44
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Ruzzano L, Borsboom D, Geurts HM 2015. Repetitive behaviors in autism and obsessive-compulsive disorder: new perspectives from a network analysis. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 45:192–202
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Schweren L, van Borkulo CD, Fried E, Goodyear IM 2018. Assessment of symptom network density as a prognostic marker of treatment response in adolescent depression. JAMA Psychiatry 75:98–100
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Selvin HC. 1958. Durkheim's Suicide and the problem of empirical research. Am. J. Sociol. 63:607–19
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Spitzer RL, First MB, Wakefield JC 2007. Saving PTSD from itself in DSM-V. J. Anxiety Disord. 21:233–41
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Summers BJ, Aalbers G, Jones PJ, McNally RJ, Phillips KA, Wilhelm S 2020. A network perspective on body dysmorphic disorder and major depressive disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 262:165–73
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. 1996. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J. Trauma Stress 9:4550471
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Terluin B, de Boer MR, de Vet HCW 2016. Differences in connection strength between mental symptoms might be explained by differences in variance: reanalysis of network data did not confirm staging. PLOS ONE 11:11E0155205
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Tryon WW. 2008. Whatever happened to symptom substitution. ? Clin. Psychol. Rev. 28:963–68
    [Google Scholar]
  122. van Bork R, Epskamp S, Rhemtulla M, Borsboom D, van der Maas HLJ 2017. What is the p-factor of psychopathology? Some risks of general factor modelling. Theory Psychol 27:759–73
    [Google Scholar]
  123. van Bork R, Rhemtulla M, Waldorp LJ, Kruis J, Rezvanifar S, Borsboom D 2019. Latent variable models and networks: statistical equivalence and testability. Multivar. Behav. Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1672515
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  124. van Borkulo CD, Borsboom D, Schoevers RA 2016. Group-level symptom networks in depression: in reply. JAMA Psychiatry 16:411–12
    [Google Scholar]
  125. van Borkulo CD, Boschloo L, Borsboom D, Penninx BWJH, Waldorp LJ, Schoevers RA 2015. Association of symptom network structure with the course of depression. JAMA Psychiatry 72:1219–26
    [Google Scholar]
  126. van de Leemput IA, Wichers M, Cramer AOJ, Borsboom D, Tuerlinckx F et al. 2014. Critical slowing down as early warning for the onset and termination of depression. PNAS 111:87–92
    [Google Scholar]
  127. van den Berg JW, Smid W, Kossakowski JJ, van Beek D, Borsboom D et al. 2020. The application of network analysis to dynamic risk factors in adult male sex offenders. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 8:539–54
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Verschuere B, van Ghesel Grothe S, Waldorp L, Watts AL, Lilienfeld SO, Noordhof A 2018. What features of psychopathy might be central? A network analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) in three large samples. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 127:51–65
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Wichers M. 2014. The dynamic nature of depression: a new micro-level perspective of mental disorder that meets current challenges. Psychol. Med. 44:1349–60
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Williams DR, Rast P. 2020. Back to the basics: rethinking partial correlation network methodology. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 73:187–212
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Williams DR, Rhemtulla M, Wysocki AC, Rast P 2019. On nonregularized estimation of psychological networks. Multivar. Behav. Res. 54:719–50
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Wolpe J. 1958. Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  133. Wolpe J. 1973. The Practice of Behavior Therapy New York: Pergamon. , 2nd. ed.
  134. Wolpe J, Rachman S. 1960. Psychoanalytic “evidence”: a critique based on Freud's case of Little Hans. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 131:135–48
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-092850
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error