Stimuli-Responsive Polymers for Soft Robotics

Literature Cited

1. 1. 

   Brown E, Rodenberg N, Amend J, Mozeika A, Steltz E et al. 2010. Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. PNAS 107:18809–14
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2. 

   Kim Y, Parada GA, Liu S, Zhao X. 2019. Ferromagnetic soft continuum robots. Sci. Robot. 4:eaax7329
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3. 

   Horchler AD, Kandhari A, Daltorio KA, Moses KC, Ryan JC et al. 2015. Peristaltic locomotion of a modular mesh-based worm robot: precision, compliance, and friction. Soft Robot 2:135–45
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4. 

   Seok S, Onal CD, Cho K, Wood RJ, Rus D, Kim S 2013. Meshworm: a peristaltic soft robot with antagonistic nickel titanium coil actuators. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 18:1485–97
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5. 

   Wehner M, Truby RL, Fitzgerald DJ, Mosadegh B, Whitesides GM et al. 2016. An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature 536:451–55
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6. 

   Zhao Y, Xuan C, Qian X, Alsaid Y, Hua M et al. 2019. Soft phototactic swimmer based on self-sustained hydrogel oscillator. Sci. Robot. 4:eaax7112
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7. 

   Jafferis NT, Helbling EF, Karpelson M, Wood RJ 2019. Untethered flight of an insect-sized flapping-wing microscale aerial vehicle. Nature 570:491–95
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8. 

   Rich SI, Wood RJ, Majidi C. 2018. Untethered soft robotics. Nat. Electron. 1:102–12
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9. 

   Hines L, Petersen K, Lum GZ, Sitti M. 2017. Soft actuators for small-scale robotics. Adv. Mater. 29:1603483
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10. 

    Cianchetti M, Laschi C, Menciassi A, Dario P 2018. Biomedical applications of soft robotics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3:143–53
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11. 

    Banerjee H, Tsz Z, Tse H, Ren H. 2018. Soft robotics with compliance and adaptation for biomedical applications and forthcoming challenges. Int. J. Robot. Autom. 33: https://doi.org/10.2316/journal.206.2018.1.206-4981
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
12. 12. 

    O'Neill CT, Phipps NS, Cappello L, Paganoni S, Walsh CJ 2017. A soft wearable robot for the shoulder: design, characterization, and preliminary testing. 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics1672–78 Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
13. 13. 

    Chen B, Zhao X 2017. PVC gel soft actuator-based wearable assist wear for hip joint support during walking. Smart Mater. Struct. 26:125003
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14. 

    Cui H, Zhao Q, Wang Y, Du X 2019. Bioinspired actuators based on stimuli-responsive polymers. Chem. Asian J. 14:2369–87
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15. 

    Yang GZ, Bellingham J, Dupont PE, Fischer P, Floridi L et al. 2018. The grand challenges of science robotics. Sci. Robot. 3:eaar7650
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16. 

    Jang KI, Chung HU, Xu S, Lee CH, Luan H et al. 2015. Soft network composite materials with deterministic and bio-inspired designs. Nat. Commun. 6:6566
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17. 

    Wirekoh J, Park Y. 2017. Design of flat pneumatic artificial muscles. Smart Mater. Struct. 26:035009
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18. 

    Truby RL, Wehner M, Grosskopf AK, Vogt DM, Uzel SGM et al. 2018. Soft somatosensitive actuators via embedded 3D printing. Adv. Mater. 30:1706383
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19. 

    Fras J, Noh Y, Wurdemann H, Althoefer K. 2017. Soft fluidic rotary actuator with improved actuation properties. 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems5610–15 Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
20. 20. 

    Wang H, Totaro M, Beccai L. 2018. Toward perceptive soft robots: progress and challenges. Adv. Sci. 5:1800541
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21. 

    Zhao H, Huang R, Shepherd RF. 2016. Curvature control of soft orthotics via low cost solid-state optics. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation4008–13 Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
22. 22. 

    Miriyev A, Stack K, Lipson H. 2017. Soft material for soft actuators. Nat. Commun. 8:596
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23. 

    Tolley MT, Shepherd RF, Karpelson M, Bartlett NW, Galloway KC et al. 2014. An untethered jumping soft robot. 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems561–66 Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
24. 24. 

    Nawroth JC, Lee H, Feinberg AW, Ripplinger CM, McCain ML et al. 2012. A tissue-engineered jellyfish with biomimetic propulsion. Nat. Biotechnol. 30:792–97
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25. 

    Park SJ, Gazzola M, Park KS, Park S, Di Santo V et al. 2016. Phototactic guidance of a tissue-engineered soft-robotic ray. Science 353:158–62
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26. 

    He Q, Wang Z, Wang Y, Song Z, Cai S. 2020. Recyclable and self-repairable fluid-driven liquid crystal elastomer actuator. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12:35464–74
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27. 

    Zeng H, Wasylczyk P, Wiersma DS, Priimagi A. 2018. Light robots: bridging the gap between microrobotics and photomechanics in soft materials. Adv. Mater. 30:1703554
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28. 

    Kim SJ, Kim MS, Kim SI, Spinks GM, Kim BC, Wallace GG 2006. Self-oscillatory actuation at constant DC voltage with pH-sensitive chitosan/polyaniline hydrogel blend. Chem. Mater. 18:5805–9
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29. 

    Shin B, Ha J, Lee M, Park K, Park GH et al. 2018. Hygrobot: a self-locomotive ratcheted actuator powered by environmental humidity. Sci. Robot. 3:eaar2629
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30. 

    Bira N, Dhagat P, Davidson JR 2020. A review of magnetic elastomers and their role in soft robotics. Front. Robot. AI 7:588391
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31. 

    Wu Y, Yim JK, Liang J, Shao Z, Qi M et al. 2019. Insect-scale fast moving and ultrarobust soft robot. Sci. Robot. 4:eaax1594
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32. 

    Ikeda T, Mamiya JI, Yu Y. 2007. Photomechanics of liquid-crystalline elastomers and other polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46:506–28
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33. 

    He Q, Wang Z, Song Z, Cai S 2019. Bioinspired design of vascular artificial muscle. Adv. Mater. Technol. 4:1800244
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34. 

    Yu Y, Nakano M, Ikeda T. 2003. Directed bending of a polymer film by light. Nature 425:145
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35. 

    White TJ, Broer DJ. 2015. Programmable and adaptive mechanics with liquid crystal polymer networks and elastomers. Nat. Mater. 14:1087–98
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36. 

    Wang C, Sim K, Chen J, Kim H, Rao Z et al. 2018. Soft ultrathin electronics innervated adaptive fully soft robots. Adv. Mater. 30:1706695
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37. 

    Kurihara S, Ikeda T, Tazuke S, Seto JE 1991. Isothermal phase transition of liquid crystals induced by photoisomerization of doped spiropyrans. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 87:3251–54
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38. 

    Allinson H, Gleeson HF. 1993. Physical properties of mixtures of low molar mass nematic liquid crystals with photochromic fulgide guest dyes. Liq. Cryst. 14:1469–78
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39. 

    White TJ, Serak SV, Tabiryan NV, Vaia RA, Bunning TJ. 2009. Polarization-controlled, photodriven bending in monodomain liquid crystal elastomer cantilevers. J. Mater. Chem. 19:1080–85
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40. 

    Wang Z, Li K, He Q, Cai S. 2019. A light-powered ultralight tensegrity robot with high deformability and load capacity. Adv. Mater. 31:1806849
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41. 

    Ahn C, Liang X, Cai S. 2019. Bioinspired design of light-powered crawling, squeezing, and jumping untethered soft robot. Adv. Mater. Technol. 4:1900185
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42. 

    Tian H, Wang Z, Chen Y, Shao J, Gao T, Cai S. 2018. Polydopamine-coated main-chain liquid crystal elastomer as optically driven artificial muscle. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10:8307–16
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43. 

    Liu X, Wei R, Hoang PT, Wang X, Liu T, Keller P 2015. Reversible and rapid laser actuation of liquid crystalline elastomer micropillars with inclusion of gold nanoparticles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25:3022–32
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44. 

    Spillmann CM, Naciri J, Ratna BR, Selinger RLB, Selinger JV. 2016. Electrically induced twist in smectic liquid-crystalline elastomers. J. Phys. Chem. B 120:636–72
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45. 

    Yuan C, Roach DJ, Dunn CK, Mu Q, Kuang X et al. 2017. 3D printed reversible shape changing soft actuators assisted by liquid crystal elastomers. Soft Matter 13:5558–68
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46. 

    Ding M, Jing L, Yang H, Machnicki CE, Fu X et al. 2020. Multifunctional soft machines based on stimuli-responsive hydrogels: from freestanding hydrogels to smart integrated systems. Mater. Today Adv. 8:100088
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47. 

    Jeon SJ, Hauser AW, Hayward RC. 2017. Shape-morphing materials from stimuli-responsive hydrogel hybrids. Acc. Chem. Res. 50:161–69
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48. 

    Paley DA, Wereley NM 2021. Bioinspired Sensing, Actuation, and Control in Underwater Soft Robotic Systems. Cham, Switz: Springer
49. 49. 

    Taylor M, Tomlins P, Sahota T 2017. Thermoresponsive gels. Gels 3:4
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50. 

    Xia LW, Xie R, Ju XJ, Wang W, Chen Q, Chu LY 2013. Nano-structured smart hydrogels with rapid response and high elasticity. Nat. Commun. 4:2226
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51. 

    Kim YS, Liu M, Ishida Y, Ebina Y, Osada M et al. 2015. Thermoresponsive actuation enabled by permittivity switching in an electrostatically anisotropic hydrogel. Nat. Mater. 14:1002–7
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52. 

    Hua M, Wu D, Wu S, Ma Y, Alsaid Y, He X. 2020. 4D printable tough and thermoresponsive hydrogels. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13:12689–97
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53. 

    Li C, Iscen A, Sai H, Sato K, Sather NA et al. 2020. Supramolecular-covalent hybrid polymers for light-activated mechanical actuation. Nat. Mater. 19:900–9
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54. 

    Haq MA, Su Y, Wang D 2017. Mechanical properties of PNIPAM based hydrogels: a review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 70:842–55
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55. 

    Zhang JT, Cheng SX, Huang SW, Zhuo RX. 2003. Temperature-sensitive poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogels with macroporous structure and fast response rate. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 24:447–51
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56. 

    Deng Z, Guo Y, Ma PX, Guo B 2018. Rapid thermal responsive conductive hybrid cryogels with shape memory properties, photothermal properties and pressure dependent conductivity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 526:281–94
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57. 

    Qian X, Zhao Y, Alsaid Y, Wang X, Hua M et al. 2019. Artificial phototropism for omnidirectional tracking and harvesting of light. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14:1048–55
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58. 

    Haraguchi K. 2007. Nanocomposite hydrogels. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 11:47–54
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59. 

    Hua M, Wu S, Ma Y, Zhao Y, Chen Z et al. 2021. Strong tough hydrogels via the synergy of freeze-casting and salting out. Nature 590:594–99
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60. 

    Wu S, Hua M, Alsaid Y, Du Y, Ma Y et al. 2021. Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels with broad-range tunable mechanical properties via the Hofmeister effect. Adv. Mater. 33:2007829
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61. 

    Zhang JT, Bhat R, Jandt KD. 2009. Temperature-sensitive PVA/PNIPAAm semi-IPN hydrogels with enhanced responsive properties. Acta Biomater 5:488–97
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62. 

    Zhang KY, Liu S, Zhao Q, Huang W. 2016. Stimuli-responsive metallopolymers. Coord. Chem. Rev. 319:180–95
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63. 

    Takashima Y, Hatanaka S, Otsubo M, Nakahata M, Kakuta T et al. 2012. Expansion–contraction of photoresponsive artificial muscle regulated by host-guest interactions. Nat. Commun. 3:1270
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64. 

    Satoh T, Sumaru K, Takagi T, Kanamori T. 2011. Fast-reversible light-driven hydrogels consisting of spirobenzopyran-functionalized poly(N-isopropylacrylamide). Soft Matter 7:8030–34
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65. 

    Ma C, Le X, Tang X, He J, Xiao P et al. 2016. A multiresponsive anisotropic hydrogel with macroscopic 3D complex deformations. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26:8670–76
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66. 

    Zhang X, Pint CL, Lee MH, Schubert BE, Jamshidi A et al. 2011. Optically- and thermally-responsive programmable materials based on carbon nanotube-hydrogel polymer composites. Nano Lett 11:3239–44
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67. 

    Yoon C, Xiao R, Park J, Cha J, Nguyen TD, Gracias DH 2014. Functional stimuli responsive hydrogel devices by self-folding. Smart Mater. Struct. 23:094008
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68. 

    Ma Y, Hua M, Wu S, Du Y, Pei X et al. 2020. Bioinspired high-power-density strong contractile hydrogel by programmable elastic recoil. Sci. Adv. 6:eabd2520
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69. 

    Yuk H, Lin S, Ma C, Takaffoli M, Fang NX, Zhao X. 2017. Hydraulic hydrogel actuators and robots optically and sonically camouflaged in water. Nat. Commun. 8:14230
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70. 

    Calvert P. 2009. Hydrogels for soft machines. Adv. Mater. 21:743–56
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71. 

    Khodambashi R, Alsaid Y, Rico R, Marvi H, Peet MM et al. 2021. Heterogeneous hydrogel structures with spatiotemporal reconfigurability using addressable and tunable voxels. Adv. Mater 33:2005906
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72. 

    Alsaid Y, Wu S, Wu D, Du Y, Shi L et al. 2021. Tunable sponge-like hierarchically porous hydrogels with simultaneously enhanced diffusivity and mechanical properties. Adv. Mater. 33:2008235
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73. 

    Yuk H, Lin S, Ma C, Takaffoli M, Fang NX, Zhao X. 2017. Hydraulic hydrogel actuators and robots optically and sonically camouflaged in water. Nat. Commun. 8:14230
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74. 

    Zheng SY, Shen Y, Zhu F, Yin J, Qian J, Fu J 2018. Programmed deformations of 3D-printed tough physical hydrogels with high response speed and large output force. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28:1803366
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75. 

    Yang C, Cheng S, Yao X, Nian G, Liu Q, Suo Z. 2020. Ionotronic luminescent fibers, fabrics, and other configurations. Adv. Mater. 32:2005545
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76. 

    Chung T, Romo-Uribe A, Mather PT. 2008. Two-way reversible shape memory in a semicrystalline network. Macromolecules 41:184–92
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77. 

    Li J, Rodgers WR, Xie T. 2011. Semi-crystalline two-way shape memory elastomer. Polymer 52:5320–25
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78. 

    Gao Y, Liu W, Zhu S. 2017. Polyolefin thermoplastics for multiple shape and reversible shape memory. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9:4882–89
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79. 

    Hu W, Lum GZ, Mastrangeli M, Sitti M 2018. Small-scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion. Nature 554:81–85
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80. 

    Amjadi M, Sitti M. 2018. Self-sensing paper actuators based on graphite-carbon nanotube hybrid films. Adv. Sci. 5:1800239
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81. 

    Gao Y, Liu W, Zhu S. 2018. Reversible shape memory polymer from semicrystalline poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) with dynamic covalent polymer networks. Macromolecules 51:8956–63
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82. 

    Behl M, Kratz K, Zotzmann J, Nöchel U, Lendlein A. 2013. Reversible bidirectional shape-memory polymers. Adv. Mater. 25:4466–69
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83. 

    Ge F, Lu X, Xiang J, Tong X, Zhao Y. 2017. An optical actuator based on gold-nanoparticle-containing temperature-memory semicrystalline polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56:6126–30
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84. 

    Wang K, Zhu XX. 2018. Two-way reversible shape memory polymers containing polydopamine nanospheres: light actuation, robotic locomotion, and artificial muscles. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 4:3099–106
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85. 

    Wang X, Sparkman J, Gou J. 2017. Electrical actuation and shape memory behavior of polyurethane composites incorporated with printed carbon nanotube layers. Compos. Sci. Technol. 141:8–15
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86. 

    Zhang F, Xia Y, Wang L, Liu L, Liu Y, Leng J. 2018. Conductive shape memory microfiber membranes with core-shell structures and electroactive performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10:35526–32
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87. 

    Joyee EB, Pan Y. 2019. A fully three-dimensional printed inchworm-inspired soft robot with magnetic actuation. Soft Robot 6:333–45
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88. 

    Almansouri AS, Alsharif NA, Khan MA, Swanepoel L, Kaidarova A et al. 2019. An imperceptible magnetic skin. Adv. Mater. Technol. 4:1900493
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89. 

    Tang J, Tong Z, Xia Y, Liu M, Lv Z et al. 2018. Super tough magnetic hydrogels for remotely triggered shape morphing. J. Mater. Chem. B 6:2713–22
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90. 

    Maffli L, Rosset S, Ghilardi M, Carpi F, Shea H. 2015. Ultrafast all-polymer electrically tunable silicone lenses. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25:1656–65
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91. 

    Shintake J, Rosset S, Schubert B, Floreano D, Shea H 2016. Versatile soft grippers with intrinsic electroadhesion based on multifunctional polymer actuators. Adv. Mater. 28:231–38
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92. 

    Ji X, Liu X, Cacucciolo V, Imboden M, Civet Y et al. 2019. An autonomous untethered fast soft robotic insect driven by low-voltage dielectric elastomer actuators. Sci. Robot. 4:eaaz6451
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93. 

    Poulin A, Rosset S, Shea HR. 2015. Printing low-voltage dielectric elastomer actuators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107:244104
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94. 

    Niu X, Stoyanov H, Hu W, Leo R, Brochu P, Pei Q. 2013. Synthesizing a new dielectric elastomer exhibiting large actuation strain and suppressed electromechanical instability without prestretching. J. Polym. Sci. B 51:197–206
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95. 

    Risse S, Kussmaul B, Krüger H, Kofod G. 2012. Synergistic improvement of actuation properties with compatibilized high permittivity filler. Adv. Funct. Mater. 22:3958–62
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96. 

    Dünki SJ, Ko YS, Nüesch FA, Opris DM. 2015. Self-repairable, high permittivity dielectric elastomers with large actuation strains at low electric fields. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25:2467–75
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97. 

    Rothemund P, Kellaris N, Mitchell SK, Acome E, Keplinger C 2020. HASEL artificial muscles for a new generation of lifelike robots—recent progress and future opportunities. Adv. Mater. 33:2003375
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98. 

    Li T, Zou Z, Mao G, Yang X, Liang Y et al. 2019. Agile and resilient insect-scale robot. Soft Robot 6:133–41
    [Google Scholar]
99. 99. 

    Li T, Li G, Liang Y, Cheng T, Dai J et al. 2017. Fast-moving soft electronic fish. Sci. Adv. 3:e1602045
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100. 

     Chen Y, Zhao H, Mao J, Chirarattananon P, Helbling EF et al. 2019. Controlled flight of a microrobot powered by soft artificial muscles. Nature 575:324–29
     [Google Scholar]
101. 101. 

     Kruusamäe K, Punning A, Aabloo A, Asaka K 2015. Self-sensing ionic polymer actuators: a review. Actuators 4:17–38
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102. 

     Madden JD, Cush RA, Kanigan TS, Hunter I. 2000. Fast contracting polypyrrole actuators. Synth. Met. 133:185–92
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103. 

     Hu F, Xue Y, Xu J, Lu B. 2019. PEDOT-based conducting polymer actuators. Front. Robot. AI 6:114
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104. 

     Melling D, Martinez JG, Jager EWH. 2019. Conjugated polymer actuators and devices: progress and opportunities. Adv. Mater. 31:1808210
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105. 

     Otero TF, Martinez JG. 2015. Physical and chemical awareness from sensing polymeric artificial muscles. Experiments and modeling. Prog. Polym. Sci. 44:62–78
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106. 

     Yang M, Yuan Z, Liu J, Fang Z, Fang L et al. 2019. Photoresponsive actuators built from carbon-based soft materials. Adv. Opt. Mater. 7:1900069
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107. 

     Kim H, Lee H, Ha I, Jung J, Won P et al. 2018. Biomimetic color changing anisotropic soft actuators with integrated metal nanowire percolation network transparent heaters for soft robotics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28:1801847
     [Google Scholar]
108. 108. 

     Yoon CK. 2019. Advances in biomimetic stimuli responsive soft grippers. Nano Converg 6:20
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109. 

     Wani OM, Zeng H, Priimagi A. 2017. A light-driven artificial flytrap. Nat. Commun. 8:15546
     [Google Scholar]
110. 110. 

     Gladman AS, Matsumoto EA, Nuzzo RG, Mahadevan L, Lewis JA. 2016. Biomimetic 4D printing. Nat. Mater. 15:413–18
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111. 

     Zhuo S, Zhao Z, Xie Z, Hao Y, Xu Y et al. 2020. Complex multiphase organohydrogels with programmable mechanics toward adaptive soft-matter machines. Sci. Adv. 6:eaax1464
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112. 

     Tian H, Liu H, Shao J, Li S, Li X, Chen X 2020. An electrically active gecko-effect soft gripper under a low voltage by mimicking gecko's adhesive structures and toe muscles. Soft Matter 16:5599–5608
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113. 

     Fang X, Liu Z, Hao Y, Yang H, Liu J et al. 2019. A soft actuator with tunable mechanical configurations for object grasping based on sensory feedback. 2019 2nd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics25–30 Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
114. 114. 

     Zeng H, Wani OM, Wasylczyk P, Kaczmarek R, Priimagi A. 2017. Self-regulating iris based on light-actuated liquid crystal elastomer. Adv. Mater. 29:1701814
     [Google Scholar]
115. 115. 

     Wani OM, Zeng H, Wasylczyk P, Priimagi A 2018. Programming photoresponse in liquid crystal polymer actuators with laser projector. Adv. Opt. Mater. 6:1700949
     [Google Scholar]
116. 116. 

     Jung K, Koo JC, Nam J, Lee YK, Choi HR 2007. Artificial annelid robot driven by soft actuators. Bioinspir. Biomim. 2:S42
     [Google Scholar]
117. 117. 

     Menciassi A, Gorini S, Pernorio G, Liu W, Valvo F, Dario P. 2004. Design, fabrication and performances of a biomimetic robotic earthworm. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics274–78 Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
118. 118. 

     Rogóż M, Zeng H, Xuan C, Wiersma DS, Wasylczyk P 2016. Light-driven soft robot mimics caterpillar locomotion in natural scale. Adv. Opt. Mater. 4:1689–94
     [Google Scholar]
119. 119. 

     Gelebart AH, Mulder DJ, Varga M, Konya A, Vantomme G et al. 2017. Making waves in a photoactive polymer film. Nature 546:632–36
     [Google Scholar]
120. 120. 

     Lu X, Guo S, Tong X, Xia H, Zhao Y. 2017. Tunable photocontrolled motions using stored strain energy in malleable azobenzene liquid crystalline polymer actuators. Adv. Mater. 29:1606467
     [Google Scholar]
121. 121. 

     Hu Y, Liu J, Chang L, Yang L, Xu A et al. 2017. Electrically and sunlight-driven actuator with versatile biomimetic motions based on rolled carbon nanotube bilayer composite. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27:1704388
     [Google Scholar]
122. 122. 

     Zeng H, Wasylczyk P, Parmeggiani C, Martella D, Burresi M, Wiersma DS. 2015. Light-fueled microscopic walkers. Adv. Mater. 27:3883–87
     [Google Scholar]
123. 123. 

     Zeng H, Wani OM, Wasylczyk P, Priimagi A. 2018. Light-driven, caterpillar-inspired miniature inching robot. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 39:1700224
     [Google Scholar]
124. 124. 

     Wie JJ, Shankar MR, White TJ. 2016. Photomotility of polymers. Nat. Commun. 7:13260
     [Google Scholar]
125. 125. 

     Purcell EM. 1977. Life at low Reynolds number. Am. J. Phys. 45:3–11
     [Google Scholar]
126. 126. 

     Zhang H, Mourran A, Möller M. 2017. Dynamic switching of helical microgel ribbons. Nano Lett 17:2010–14
     [Google Scholar]
127. 127. 

     Mourran A, Zhang H, Vinokur R, Möller M. 2017. Soft microrobots employing nonequilibrium actuation via plasmonic heating. Adv. Mater. 29:1604825
     [Google Scholar]
128. 128. 

     Palagi S, Mark AG, Reigh SY, Melde K, Qiu T et al. 2016. Structured light enables biomimetic swimming and versatile locomotion of photoresponsive soft microrobots. Nat. Mater. 15:647–53
     [Google Scholar]
129. 129. 

     Diller E, Zhuang J, Zhan Lum G, Edwards MR, Sitti M 2014. Continuously distributed magnetization profile for millimeter-scale elastomeric undulatory swimming. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104:174101
     [Google Scholar]
130. 130. 

     Huang C, Lv JA, Tian X, Wang Y, Yu Y, Liu J 2015. Miniaturized swimming soft robot with complex movement actuated and controlled by remote light signals. Sci. Rep. 5:17414
     [Google Scholar]
131. 131. 

     Zhang L, Abbott JJ, Dong L, Kratochvil BE, Bell D, Nelson BJ. 2009. Artificial bacterial flagella: fabrication and magnetic control. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94:2007–10
     [Google Scholar]
132. 132. 

     Kim B, Kim D, Jung J 2005. A biomimetic undulatory tadpole robot using ionic polymer–metal composite. Smart Mater. Struct. 14:1579
     [Google Scholar]
133. 133. 

     Tan X, Kim D, Usher N, Laboy D, Jackson J et al. 2006. An autonomous robotic fish for mobile sensing. 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems5424–29 Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
134. 134. 

     Gu H, Boehler Q, Cui H, Secchi E, Savorana G et al. 2020. Magnetic cilia carpets with programmable metachronal waves. Nat. Commun. 11:2637
     [Google Scholar]
135. 135. 

     Gelebart AH, Vantomme G, Meijer EW, Broer DJ. 2017. Mastering the photothermal effect in liquid crystal networks: a general approach for self-sustained mechanical oscillators. Adv. Mater. 29:1606712
     [Google Scholar]
136. 136. 

     Serak S, Tabiryan N, Vergara R, White TJ, Vaia RA, Bunning TJ. 2010. Liquid crystalline polymer cantilever oscillators fueled by light. Soft Matter 6:779–83
     [Google Scholar]
137. 137. 

     Yang L, Chang L, Hu Y, Huang M, Ji Q et al. 2020. An autonomous soft actuator with light-driven self-sustained wavelike oscillation for phototactic self-locomotion and power generation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30:1908842
     [Google Scholar]
138. 138. 

     White TJ, Tabiryan NV, Serak SV, Hrozhyk UA, Tondiglia VP et al. 2008. A high frequency photodriven polymer oscillator. Soft Matter 4:1796
     [Google Scholar]
139. 139. 

     Lee KM, Smith ML, Koerner H, Tabiryan N, Vaia RA et al. 2011. Photodriven, flexural-torsional oscillation of glassy azobenzene liquid crystal polymer networks. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21:2913–18
     [Google Scholar]
140. 140. 

     Kumar K, Knie C, Bléger D, Peletier MA, Friedrich H et al. 2016. A chaotic self-oscillating sunlight-driven polymer actuator. Nat. Commun. 7:11975
     [Google Scholar]
141. 141. 

     Wang XQ, Tan CF, Chan KH, Lu X, Zhu L et al. 2018. In-built thermo-mechanical cooperative feedback mechanism for self-propelled multimodal locomotion and electricity generation. Nat. Commun. 9:3438
     [Google Scholar]
142. 142. 

     Chen Y, Wang H, Helbling EF, Jafferis NT, Zufferey R et al. 2017. A biologically inspired, flapping-wing, hybrid aerial-aquatic microrobot. Sci. Robot. 2:eaao5619
     [Google Scholar]
143. 143. 

     Ma KY, Chirarattananon P, Fuller SB, Wood RJ. 2013. Controlled flight of a biologically inspired, insect-scale robot. Science 340:603–7
     [Google Scholar]
144. 144. 

     Yuan X, Liu H, Zou J, Jin G, Sun L 2019. Soft tactile sensor and curvature sensor for caterpillar-like soft robot's adaptive motion. RICAI 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Robotics, Intelligent Control and Artificial Intelligence690–95 New York: ACM
145. 145. 

     Zhao H, O'Brien K, Li S, Shepherd RF 2016. Optoelectronically innervated soft prosthetic hand via stretchable optical waveguides. Sci. Robot. 1:eaai7529
     [Google Scholar]
146. 146. 

     Zhao Y, Lo C-Y, Ruan L, Pi C-H, Kim C et al. 2021. Somatosensory actuator based on stretchable conductive photothermally responsive hydrogel. Sci. Robot 6:eabd5483
     [Google Scholar]
147. 147. 

     Larson C, Peele B, Li S, Robinson S, Totaro M et al. 2016. Highly stretchable electroluminescent skin for optical signaling and tactile sensing. Science 351:1071–74
     [Google Scholar]
148. 148. 

     Cheng H, Zhao F, Xue J, Shi G, Jiang L, Qu L. 2016. One single graphene oxide film for responsive actuation. ACS Nano 10:9529–35
     [Google Scholar]
149. 149. 

     Wang XQ, Chan KH, Cheng Y, Ding T, Li T et al. 2020. Somatosensory, light-driven, thin-film robots capable of integrated perception and motility. Adv. Mater. 32:2000351
     [Google Scholar]
150. 150. 

     Li S, Bai H, Liu Z, Zhang X, Huang Cet al 2021. Digital light processing of liquid crystal elastomers for self-sensing artificial muscles. Sci. Adv 7:eabg3677
     [Google Scholar]