Mass Probation from Micro to Macro: Tracing the Expansion and Consequences of Community Supervision

Literature Cited

1. Aebi MF, Delgrande N, Marguet Y 2015. Have community sanctions and measures widened the net of the European criminal justice systems?. Punishm. Soc. 17:5575–97
   [Google Scholar]
2. Albonetti CA, Hepburn JR. 1997. Probation revocation: a proportional hazards model of the conditioning effects of social disadvantage. Soc. Probl. 44:1124–38
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alexander M. 2010. The New Jim Crow: Mass Imprisonment in the Age of Colorblindness New York: New Press
4. Alper M, Corda A, Reitz KR 2016. American Exceptionalism in Probation Supervision Minneapolis, MN: Robina Inst. Crim. Law Crim. Justice
5. Apel R. 2016. The effects of jail and prison confinement on cohabitation and marriage. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 665:103–26
   [Google Scholar]
6. Austin J. 2016. Regulating California's prison population: the use of sticks and carrots. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 664:84–107
   [Google Scholar]
7. Beckett K. 2018. The politics, promise, and peril of criminal justice reform in the context of mass incarceration. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 1:235–59
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bonczar TP, Mulako-Wangota J. 2019. Supervision rate of total probation population Corrections Statistical Analysis Tool (CSAT)—Probation, Bur. Justice Stat Washington, DC: retrieved July 19, 2019. https://www.bjs.gov/probation/
9. Bonta J, Rugge T, Scott TL, Bourgon GUY, Yessine AK 2008. Exploring the black box of community supervision. J. Offender Rehabil. 47:3248–70
   [Google Scholar]
10. Brayne S. 2014. Surveillance and system avoidance: criminal justice contact and institutional attachment. Am. Soc. Rev. 79:3367–91
    [Google Scholar]
11. Brennan Cent. Justice 2010. Criminal Justice Debt: A Barrier to Reentry New York: Brennan Cent. Justice
12. Burch TR. 2014. Effects of imprisonment and community supervision on neighborhood political participation in North Carolina. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 651:184–201
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bur. Justice Stat 2019. Key statistic: total correctional population. Bureau of Justice Statistics https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=kfdetail&iid=487
    [Google Scholar]
14. Campbell MC. 2018. Varieties of mass incarceration: what we learn from state histories. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 1:219–34
    [Google Scholar]
15. Carson EA, Mulako-Wangota J. 2019. Imprisonment rates of jurisdiction population: sentences greater than 1 year Corrections Statistical Analysis Tool (CSAT)—Prisoners, Bur. Justice Stat. Washington, DC: retrieved July 19, 2019. https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=nps
16. Cent. Behav. Health Stat. Qual 2012. National survey on drug use and health, 2012 Subst. Abuse Ment. Health Serv. Adm. Rep. NSDUH-2012-DS0001, US Dep. Health Hum. Serv. Rockville, MD:
17. Cent. Behav. Health Stat. Qual 2018a. National survey on drug use and health, 2016 Subst. Abuse Ment. Health Serv. Adm. Rep. NSDUH-2016-DS0001, US Dep. Health Hum. Serv Rockville, MD:
18. Cent. Behav. Health Stat. Qual 2018b. National survey on drug use and health, 2017 Subst. Abuse Ment. Health Serv. Adm. Rep. NSDUH-2017-DS0001, US Dep. Health Hum. Serv Rockville, MD:
19. Chiricos T, Barrick K, Bales W, Bontrager S 2007. The labeling of convicted felons and its consequences for recidivism. Criminology 45:3547–81
    [Google Scholar]
20. Clear TR. 2007. Imprisoning Communities: How Mass Incarceration Makes Disadvantaged Neighborhoods Worse Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
21. Clear TR, Latessa EJ. 1993. Probation officer roles in intensive supervision: surveillance versus treatment. Justice Q 10:441–61
    [Google Scholar]
22. Cohen S. 1985. Visions of Social Control: Crime, Punishment and Classification Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
23. Columbia Justice Lab 2018. Too Big to Succeed: The Impact of the Growth of Community Corrections and What Should Be Done About It New York: Columbia Justice Lab
24. Comfort M. 2008. Doing Time Together: Love and Family in the Shadow of the Prison Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
25. Comfort M. 2016. A twenty-hour-a-day job: the impact of frequent low-level criminal justice involvement on family life. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 665:163–79
    [Google Scholar]
26. Cox A. 2018. Trapped in a Vice: The Consequences of Confinement for Young People Camden, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
27. CSG Justice Cent 2019. Confined and costly: how supervision violations are filling prisons and burdening budgets Rep., Counc. State Gov. New York:
28. Davis E, Whyde A, Langton L 2018. Contacts between police and the public, 2015 Bur. Justice Stat. Rep. NCJ251145, US Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
29. DeMichele M. 2014. Studying the community corrections field: applying neo-institutional theories to a hidden element of mass social control. Theor. Criminol. 18:4546–64
    [Google Scholar]
30. DeMichele MT. 2007. Probation and parole's growing caseloads and workload allocation: strategies for managerial decision making Rep., Am. Probat. Parole Assoc Lexington, KY:
31. Doherty F. 2016. Obey all laws and be good: probation and the meaning of recidivism. Georget. Law J. 104:291–354
    [Google Scholar]
32. Doleac JL. 2018. Strategies to productively reincorporate the formerly-incarcerated into communities: a review of the literature SSRN Work. Pap. 3198112. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3198112
33. Durnescu I, McNeill F, Butter R 2016. Probation: 12 Essential Questions London: Palgrave Macmillan
34. Durose MR, Langan PA. 2005. State court sentencing of convicted felons, 2002 Bur. Justice Stat. Rep. NCJ208910, US Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
35. Fader JJ. 2013. Falling Back: Incarceration and Transitions to Adulthood among Urban Youth New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
36. Feeley MM, Simon J. 1992. The new penology: notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology 30:4449–74
    [Google Scholar]
37. Finkel M. 2019. New data: low incomes–but high fees–for people on probation Rep., Prison Policy Initiat. Northampton, MA: https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2019/04/09/probation_income/
38. Garland D. 2001. Introduction: the meaning of mass imprisonment. Punishm. Soc. 3:15–7
    [Google Scholar]
39. Glaze L, Bonczar T. 2009. Adults on probation in the United States, 1977–2008 Bur. Justice Stat. Rep., US Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
40. Grattet R, Petersilia J, Lin J, Beckman L 2009. Parole violations and revocations in California: analysis and suggestions for action. Fed. Probat. 73:2–11
    [Google Scholar]
41. Green DP, Winik D. 2010. Using random judge assignments to estimate the effects of incarceration and probation on recidivism among drug offenders. Criminology 48:2357–87
    [Google Scholar]
42. Harding DJ, Morenoff JD, Herbert CW 2013. Home is hard to find neighborhoods, institutions, and the residential trajectories of returning prisoners. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 647:1214–36
    [Google Scholar]
43. Harding DJ, Morenoff JD, Nguyen AP, Bushway SD 2017a. Short- and long-term effects of imprisonment on future felony convictions and prison admissions. PNAS 114:4211103–8
    [Google Scholar]
44. Harding DJ, Morenoff JD, Wyse JJB 2018. On the Outside: Prisoner Reentry and Reintegration Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
45. Harding DJ, Siegel JA, Morenoff JD 2017b. Custodial parole sanctions and earnings after release from prison. Soc. Forces 96:2909–34
    [Google Scholar]
46. Harris A. 2016. A Pound of Flesh: Monetary Sanctions as Punishment for the Poor New York: Russell Sage Found
47. Hipp JR, Petersilia J, Turner S 2010. Parolee recidivism in California: the effect of neighborhood context and social service agency characteristics. Criminology 48:4947–79
    [Google Scholar]
48. Jacobs JB. 2015. The Eternal Criminal Record Cambridge, MA: Harv. Univ. Press
49. Jacobson MP, Schiraldi V, Daly R, Hotez E 2017. Less is more: how reducing probation populations can improve outcomes Rep., Executive Session Community Correct. Harv. Kennedy School Boston, MA:
50. Kaeble D, Cowhig M. 2018. Correctional populations in the United States, 2016 Bur. Justice Stat. Rep. NCJ251148, US Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
51. Kaeble D, Maruschak L, Bonczar T 2017. Probation and parole in the United States, 2014 Bur. Justice Stat. Rep. NCJ249057, US Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
52. Kirk DS, Wakefield S. 2018. Collateral consequences of punishment: a critical review and path forward. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 1:171–94
    [Google Scholar]
53. Klingele C. 2013. Rethinking the use of community. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 103:41015–70
    [Google Scholar]
54. Knapp CD, Howell BA, Wang EA, Shlafer RJ, Hardeman RR, Winkelman TNA 2019. Health insurance gains after implementation of the Affordable Care Act Among individuals recently on probation: USA, 2008–2016. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 34:71086–88
    [Google Scholar]
55. Kohler-Hausmann I. 2018. Misdemeanorland: Criminal Courts and Social Control in an Age of Broken Windows Policing Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press
56. Kohler-Hausmann I. 2019. Eddie Murphy and the dangers of counterfactual causal thinking about detecting racial discrimination SSRN Work. Pap. 3050650 https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3050650
57. Kurlychek MC, Johnson BD. 2019. Cumulative disadvantage in the American criminal justice system. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 2:291–319
    [Google Scholar]
58. Latessa E, Lowenkamp C. 2006. What works in reducing recidivism. Univ. St. Thomas Law J. 3:3521–35
    [Google Scholar]
59. Lauritsen JL, Rezey ML, Heimer K 2016. When choice of data matters: analyses of U.S. crime trends, 1973–2012. J. Quant. Criminol. 32:3335–55
    [Google Scholar]
60. Lerman AE, Weaver VM. 2014. Arresting Citizenship: The Democratic Consequences of American Crime Control Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
61. Leverentz AM. 2014. The Ex-Prisoner's Dilemma: How Women Negotiate Competing Narratives of Reentry and Desistance New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
62. Loeffler CE. 2013. Does imprisonment alter the life course? Evidence on crime and employment from a natural experiment. Criminology 51:1137–66
    [Google Scholar]
63. Lowenkamp CT, Flores AW, Holsinger AM, Makarios MD, Latessa EJ 2010. Intensive supervision programs: Does program philosophy and the principles of effective intervention matter. J. Crim. Justice 38:4368–75
    [Google Scholar]
64. MacKenzie DL, Browing K, Skroban SB, Smith DA 1999. The impact of probation on the criminal activities of offenders. J. Res. Crime Delinquency 36:4423–53
    [Google Scholar]
65. Manza J, Uggen C. 2008. Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy New York: Oxford Univ. Press
66. May DC, Wood PB, Eades A 2008. Lessons learned from punishment exchange rates: implications for theory, research, and correctional policy. J. Behav. Anal. Offender Vict. Treat. Prev. 1:2187–201
    [Google Scholar]
67. McKim A. 2017. Addicted to Rehab: Race, Gender, and Drugs in the Era of Mass Incarceration New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
68. McNeill F. 2018. Mass supervision, misrecognition and the “Malopticon.”. Punishm. Soc. 21:2207–30
    [Google Scholar]
69. Miller RJ. 2014. Devolving the carceral state: race, prisoner reentry, and the micro-politics of urban poverty management. Punishm. Soc. 16:305–35
    [Google Scholar]
70. Morash M, Kashy DA, Smith SW, Cobbina JE 2017. Technical violations, treatment and punishment responses, and recidivism of women on probation and parole. Crim. Justice Policy Rev. 30:5788–810
    [Google Scholar]
71. Natapoff A. 2018. Punishment Without Crime: How Our Massive Misdemeanor System Traps the Innocent and Makes America More Unequal New York: Basic Books
72. Natl. Res. Counc. (NRC) 2014. The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
73. Olson DE. 2019. Probation revocation. Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Criminology and Criminal Justice, ed. HN Pontell Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
74. Owens ML, Walker HL. 2018. The civic voluntarism of “custodial citizens”: involuntary criminal justice contact, associational life, and political participation. Perspect. Politics 16:4990–1013
    [Google Scholar]
75. Pager D. 2007. Marked: Race, Crime, and Finding Work in an Era of Mass Incarceration Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
76. Petersilia J, Turner S. 1993. Intensive probation and parole. Crime Justice 17:281–35
    [Google Scholar]
77. Pettit B. 2012. Invisible Men: Mass Incarceration and the Myth of Black Progress New York: Russell Sage Found
78. Pfaff J. 2017. Locked In: The True Causes of Mass Incarceration and How to Achieve Real Reform New York: Basic Books
79. Phelps MS. 2013. The paradox of probation: community supervision in the age of mass incarceration. Law Policy 35:1–251–80
    [Google Scholar]
80. Phelps MS. 2016. Possibilities and contestation in twenty-first-century US criminal justice downsizing. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 12:153–70
    [Google Scholar]
81. Phelps MS. 2017. Mass probation: toward a more robust theory of state variation in punishment. Punishm. Soc. 19:153–73
    [Google Scholar]
82. Phelps MS. 2018. Mass probation and inequality: race, class, and gender disparities in supervision and revocation. Handbook on Punishment Decisions: Locations of Disparity JT Ulmer, MS Bradley 43–65 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
83. Phelps MS, Ruhland E. 2019. Governing marginality: coercion and care in probation supervision Paper presented at the 2019 Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association Washington, DC: May 31
84. Raphael S, Stoll MA. 2013. Why Are So Many Americans in Prison? New York: Russell Sage Found
    [Google Scholar]
85. Reitz KR, Rhine EE. 2020. Parole release and supervision: critical drivers of American prison policy. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 3:281–98
    [Google Scholar]
86. Remster B, Kramer R. 2018. Race, space, and surveillance: understanding the relationship between criminal justice contact and institutional involvement. Socius https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118761434
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
87. Rios VM. 2011. Punished: Policing the lives of Black and Latino Boys New York: NYU Press
88. Rios VM. 2017. Human Targets: Schools, Police, and the Criminalization of Latino Youth Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
89. Schoenfeld H. 2016. A research agenda on reform: penal policy and politics across the states. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 664:1155–74
    [Google Scholar]
90. Spohn C. 2015. Race, crime, and punishment in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Crime Justice 44:149–97
    [Google Scholar]
91. Shaffer DK. 2011. Looking inside the black box of drug courts: a meta-analytic review. Justice Q. 28:3493–521
    [Google Scholar]
92. Sissoko DRG, Goshin LS. 2019. Mothering under community criminal justice supervision in the United States. The Palgrave Handbook of Prison and the Family M Hutton, D Moran 431–55 London: Palgrave Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
93. Skeem JL, Manchak S. 2008. Back to the future: from Klockars’ model of effective supervision to evidence-based practice in probation. J. Offender Rehabil. 47:3220–47
    [Google Scholar]
94. Skeem JL, Manchak S, Peterson JK 2011. Correctional policy for offenders with mental illness: creating a new paradigm for recidivism reduction. Law Hum. Behav. 35:2110–26
    [Google Scholar]
95. Sykes BL, Pettit B. 2014. Mass incarceration, family complexity, and the reproduction of childhood disadvantage. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 654:1127–49
    [Google Scholar]
96. Taxman FS. 2012. Probation, intermediate sanctions, and community-based corrections. The Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections J Petersilia, KR Reitz 363–85 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
97. Turney K, Conner E. 2019. Jail incarceration: a common and consequential form of criminal justice contact. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 2:265–90
    [Google Scholar]
98. Vaughn MG, DeLisi M, Beaver KM, Perron BE, Abdon A 2012. Toward a criminal justice epidemiology: behavioral and physical health of probationers and parolees in the United States. J. Crim. Justice 40:3165–73
    [Google Scholar]
99. Wacquant L. 2000. The new “peculiar institution”: on the prison as surrogate ghetto. Theor. Criminol 4:3377–89
    [Google Scholar]
100. Wakefield S, Wildeman C. 2013. Children of the Prison Boom: Mass Incarceration and the Future of American Inequality Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
101. Welsh M. 2019. How formerly incarcerated women confront the limits of caring and the burdens of control amid California's carceral realignment. Fem. Criminol. 14:189–114
     [Google Scholar]
102. Werth R. 2012. I do what I'm told, sort of: reformed subjects, unruly citizens, and parole. Theor. Criminol. 16:329–46
     [Google Scholar]
103. Western B. 2006. Punishment and Inequality in America New York: Russell Sage Found
104. Western B. 2018. Homeward: Life in the Year After Prison New York: Russell Sage Found
105. Western B, Muller C. 2013. Mass incarceration, macrosociology, and the poor. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 647:166–89
     [Google Scholar]
106. Winkelman TNA, Phelps MS, Mitchell K, Jennings L, Shlafer RJ 2020. Physical health and disability among adults on community supervision in the United States. J. Corr. Health Care. In press
     [Google Scholar]