Public Opinion and Criminal Justice Policy: Theory and Research

Literature Cited

1. Althaus SL 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anderson AL, Lytle R, Schwadel P 2017. Age, period, and cohort effects on death penalty attitudes in the United States, 1974–2014. Criminology 55:833–68
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ansolabehere SD, Snyder JM Jr., Stewart C 2001. Candidate positioning in U.S. House elections. Am. J. Political Sci. 45:136–59
   [Google Scholar]
4. Applegate BK, Cullen FT, Turner MG, Sundt JL 1996. Assessing public support for three strikes-and-you're-out laws: global versus specific attitudes. Crime Delinquency 42:517–34
   [Google Scholar]
5. Aspin LT, Hall WK 1994. Retention election and judicial behavior. Judicature 77:306–15
   [Google Scholar]
6. Baum L 2003. Judicial elections and judicial independence: the voter's perspective. Ohio State Law J 64:13–41
   [Google Scholar]
7. Baumer EP 2013. Reassessing and redirecting research on race and sentencing. Justice Q 30:231–61
   [Google Scholar]
8. Baumer EP, Martin KH 2013. Social organization, collective sentiment, and legal sanctions in murder cases. Am. J. Sociol. 119:131–82
   [Google Scholar]
9. Baumgartner FR, De Boef SL, Boydstun AE 2008. The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
10. Beckett K 1997. Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
11. Beckett K, Sasson T 2004. The Politics of Injustice: Crime and Punishment in America Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. , 2nd ed..
12. Bishop GF, Tuchfarber AJ, Oldendick RW 1986. Opinions on fictitious issues: the pressure to answer survey questions. Public Opin. Q. 50:240–50
    [Google Scholar]
13. Blumer H 1948. Public opinion and public opinion polling. Am. Sociol. Rev. 13:542–49
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bohm RM, Vogel BL 2004. More than ten years after: the long-term stability of informed death penalty opinions. J. Crim. Justice 32:307–27
    [Google Scholar]
15. Boyd CL, Nelson MJ 2017. The effects of trial judge gender and public opinion on criminal sentencing decisions. Vanderbilt Law Rev 70:1819–43
    [Google Scholar]
16. Brace P, Boyea BD 2008. State public opinion, the death penalty, and the practice of electing judges. Am. J. Political Sci. 52:360–72
    [Google Scholar]
17. Brace P, Sims-Butler K, Arceneaux K, Johnson M 2002. Public opinion in the American states: new perspectives using national survey data. Am. J. Political Sci. 46:173–89
    [Google Scholar]
18. Brooks C, Manza J 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
19. Burstein P 1998. Bringing the public back in: Should sociologists consider the impact of public opinion on public policy. ? Soc. Forces 77:27–62
    [Google Scholar]
20. Burstein P 2006. Why estimates of the impact of public opinion on public policy are too high: empirical and theoretical implications. Soc. Forces 84:2273–89
    [Google Scholar]
21. Burstein P, Linton A 2002. The impact of political parties, interest groups, and social movement organizations on public policy. Soc. Forces 81:380–408
    [Google Scholar]
22. Campbell MC 2018. Varieties of mass incarceration: what we learn from state histories. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 1:219–34
    [Google Scholar]
23. Campbell MC, Vogel M, Williams J 2015. Historical contingencies and the evolving importance of race, violent crime, and region in explaining mass incarceration in the United States. Criminology 53:180–203
    [Google Scholar]
24. Canes-Wrone B, Clark TS, Kelly JP 2014. Judicial selection and death penalty decisions. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 108:23–39
    [Google Scholar]
25. Casillas CJ, Enns PK, Wohlfarth PC 2011. How public opinion constrains the U.S. Supreme Court. Am. J. Political Sci. 55:74–88
    [Google Scholar]
26. Chiricos T, Welch K, Gertz M 2004. Racial typification of crime and support for punitive measures. Criminology 42:359–89
    [Google Scholar]
27. Cochran JK, Boots DP, Heide KM 2003. Attribution styles and attitudes toward capital punishment for juveniles, the mentally incompetent, and the mentally retarded. Justice Q. 20:65–93
    [Google Scholar]
28. Cohen JE 1997. Presidential Responsiveness and Public Policymaking Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. Michigan Press
29. Converse PE 1964. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. Ideology and Discontent DE Apter 206–61 New York: Free Press
    [Google Scholar]
30. Converse PE 1970. Attitudes and nonattitudes: continuation of a dialogue. The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems ER Tufte 168–89 Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
    [Google Scholar]
31. Converse PE 1990. Popular representation and the distribution of information. Information and Democratic Processes JA Ferejohn, JH Kuklinski 369–88 Champaign, IL: Univ. Ill. Press
    [Google Scholar]
32. Converse PE 2000. Assessing the capacity of mass electorates. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 3:331–53
    [Google Scholar]
33. Cook BB 1977. Public opinion and federal judicial policy. Am. J. Political Sci. 21:567–600
    [Google Scholar]
34. Craun SW, Kernsmith PD, Butler NK 2011. “Anything that can be a danger to the public”: desire to extend registries beyond sex offenses. Crim. Justice Policy Rev. 22:375–91
    [Google Scholar]
35. Cullen FT, Fisher BS, Applegate BK 2000. Public opinion about punishment and corrections. Crime and Justice 27 M Tonry 1–79 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
36. Davila MA, Hartley DJ, Buckler K, Wilson S 2011. Personal and vicarious experience with the criminal justice system as a predictor of punitive sentencing. Am. J. Crim. Justice 36:408–20
    [Google Scholar]
37. de Keijser JW 2014. Penal theory and popular opinion: the deficiencies of direct engagement. Popular Punishment: On the Normative Significance of Public Opinion J Ryberg, JV Roberts 101–18 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
38. Drakulich KM, Kirk EM 2016. Public opinion and criminal justice reform: framing matters. Criminol. Public Policy 15:171–77
    [Google Scholar]
39. Enns PK 2014. The public's increasing punitiveness and its influence on mass incarceration in the United States. Am. J. Political Sci. 58:857–72
    [Google Scholar]
40. Enns PK 2016. Incarceration Nation: How the United States Became the Most Punitive Democracy in the World New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
41. Enns PK, Kellstedt PM 2008. Policy mood and political sophistication: why everybody moves mood. Br. J. Political Sci. 38:433–54
    [Google Scholar]
42. Erikson RS 1976. The relationship between public opinion and state policy: a new look based on some forgotten data. Am. J. Political Sci. 20:25–36
    [Google Scholar]
43. Erikson RS, Mackuen MB, Stimson JA 2002.a The Macro Polity New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
44. Erikson RS, Mackuen MB, Stimson JA 2002.b Panderers or shirkers? Politicians and public opinion. Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy J Manza, FL Cook, BI Page 76–85 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
45. Falcone DN, Wells LE 1995. The county sheriff as a distinctive policing modality. Am. J. Police 3/4:123–49
    [Google Scholar]
46. Fernandez KE, Bowman T 2004. Race, political institutions, and criminal justice: an examination of the sentencing of Latino offenders. Columbia Hum. Rights Law Rev. 36:41–70
    [Google Scholar]
47. Furman v. Georgia 408 U.S. 238 1972.
48. Geer JG 1996. From Tea Leaves to Opinion Polls: A Theory of Democratic Leadership New York: Columbia Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
49. Gerber ER 1999. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
50. Gilliam FD Jr., Iyengar S 2000. Prime suspects: the influence of local television news on the viewing public. Am. J. Political Sci. 44:560–73
    [Google Scholar]
51. Glynn CJ, Herbst S, O'Keefe GJ, Shapiro RY, Lindeman M 2004. Public Opinion Boulder, CO: Westview Press. , 2nd ed..
52. Gottschalk M 2006. The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
53. Hetey RC, Eberhardt JL 2014. Racial disparities in incarceration increase acceptance of punitive policies. Psychol. Sci. 25:1949–54
    [Google Scholar]
54. Hough M, Park A 2002. How malleable are attitudes to crime and punishment? Findings from a British deliberative poll. Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public Opinion, Crime and Justice JV Roberts, M Hough 163–83 Portland, OR: Willan
    [Google Scholar]
55. Hough M, Roberts JV 1999. Sentencing trends in Britain: Public knowledge and public opinion. Punishm. Soc. 1:11–26
    [Google Scholar]
56. Huber GA, Gordon SC 2004. Accountability and coercion: Is justice blind when it runs for office. ? Am. J. Political Sci. 48:247–63
    [Google Scholar]
57. Igo SE 2007. The Averaged American: Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of a Mass Public Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
58. Indermaur D, Roberts L, Spiranovic C, Mackenzie G, Gelb K 2012. A matter of judgment: the effect of information and deliberation on public attitudes to punishment. Punishm. Soc. 14:147–65
    [Google Scholar]
59. Iyengar S, Westwood SJ 2015. Fear and loathing across party lines: new evidence on group polarization. Am. J. Political Sci. 59:691–707
    [Google Scholar]
60. Jacobs D, Carmichael JT 2001. The politics of punishment across time and space: A pooled time-series analysis of imprisonment rates. Soc. Forces 80:61–91
    [Google Scholar]
61. Jacobs D, Kent SL 2007. The determinants of executions since 1951: how politics, protests, public opinion, and social divisions shape capital punishment. Soc. Probl. 54:297–318
    [Google Scholar]
62. Jacobs LR, Shapiro RY 2000. Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
63. Jennings W, Farrall S, Gray E, Hay C 2017. Penal populism and the public thermostat: crime, public punitiveness, and public policy. Governance 30:463–81
    [Google Scholar]
64. Jennings W, Wlezien C 2015. Preferences, problems and representation. Political Sci. Res. Methods 3:659–81
    [Google Scholar]
65. Karch A, Cravens M 2014. Rapid diffusion and policy reform: the adoption and modification of three strikes laws. State Politics Policy Q 14:461–91
    [Google Scholar]
66. Kennedy-Kollar D, Mandery EJ 2010. Testing the Marshall Hypothesis and its antithesis: the effect of biased information on death-penalty opinion. Crim. Justice Stud. 23:65–83
    [Google Scholar]
67. Kleck G, Jackson DB 2017. Does crime cause punitiveness. ? Crime Delinquency 63:1572–99
    [Google Scholar]
68. Kleck G, Sever B, Li S, Gertz M 2005. The missing link in general deterrence research. Criminology 43:623–60
    [Google Scholar]
69. Kuklinski JH, Stanga JE 1979. Political participation and government responsiveness: the behavior of California superior courts. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 73:1090–99
    [Google Scholar]
70. Lageson SE, Denver M, Pickett JT 2018. Privatizing criminal stigma: experience, intergroup contact, and public views about publicizing arrest records. Punishm. Soc. In press
71. Landemore H, Elster J 2012. Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
72. Lax JR, Phillips JH 2012. The democratic deficit in the states. Am. J. Political Sci. 56:148–66
    [Google Scholar]
73. Lewis DC, Wood FS, Jacobsmeier ML 2014. Public opinion and judicial behavior in direct democracy systems: gay rights in the American states. State Politics Policy Q 14:367–88
    [Google Scholar]
74. Lupia A, Matsusaka JG 2004. Direct democracy: new approaches to old questions. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 7:463–82
    [Google Scholar]
75. Manza J, Brooks C 2012. How sociology lost public opinion: a genealogy of a missing concept in the study of the political. Sociol. Theory 30:89–113
    [Google Scholar]
76. Manza J, Cook FL 2002. The impact of public opinion on public policy: the state of the debate. Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy J Manza, FL Cook, BI Page 17–32 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
77. Mayer WG 1992. The Changing American Mind: How and Why American Public Opinion Changed Between 1960 and 1988 Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. Michigan Press
    [Google Scholar]
78. McCubbins MD, Schwartz T 1984. Congressional oversight overlooked: police patrols versus fire alarms. Am. J. Political Sci. 28:165–79
    [Google Scholar]
79. McGann AJ 2014. Estimating the political center from aggregate data: an item response theory alternative to the Stimson dyad ratios algorithm. Political Anal 22:115–29
    [Google Scholar]
80. McGuire KT, Stimson JA 2004. The least dangerous branch revisited: new evidence on Supreme Court responsiveness to public preferences. J. Politics 66:1018–35
    [Google Scholar]
81. Mears DP, Mancini C, Beaver KM, Gertz M 2013. Housing for the “worst of the worst” inmates: public support for supermax prisons. Crime Delinquency 59:587–615
    [Google Scholar]
82. Miller LL 2016. The Myth of Mob Rule: Violent Crime and Democratic Politics New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
83. Miller NR 1986. Information, electorates, and democracy: some extensions and interpretations of the Condorcet Jury Theorem?. Information Pooling and Group Decision Making B Grofman, G Owen 173–92 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
    [Google Scholar]
84. Miller RN, Applegate BK 2015. Adult crime, adult time? Benchmarking public views on punishing serious juvenile felons. Crim. Justice Rev. 40:151–68
    [Google Scholar]
85. Monroe AD 1998. Public opinion and public policy, 1980–1993. Public Opin. Q. 62:6–28
    [Google Scholar]
86. Mooney CZ, Lee M 2000. The influence of values on consensus and contentious morality policy: U.S. death penalty reform, 1956–82. J. Politics 62:223–39
    [Google Scholar]
87. Murr AE 2011. “Wisdom of crowds”? A decentralized election forecasting model that uses citizens’ local expectations. Elect. Stud. 30:771–83
    [Google Scholar]
88. Nelson MJ 2014. Responsive justice? Retention elections, prosecutors, and public opinion. J. Law Courts 2:117–52
    [Google Scholar]
89. Nicholson-Crotty S, Meier KJ 2003. Crime and punishment: the politics of federal criminal justice sanctions. Political Res. Q. 56:119–26
    [Google Scholar]
90. Nicholson-Crotty S, Peterson DAM, Ramirez MD 2009. Dynamic representation(s): federal criminal justice policy and an alternative dimension of public mood. Political Behav 31:629–55
    [Google Scholar]
91. Norrander B 2000. The multi-layered impact of public opinion on capital punishment implementation in the American states. Political Res. Q. 53:771–93
    [Google Scholar]
92. Owens RJ, Wohlfarth PC 2017. Public mood, previous electoral experience, and responsiveness among federal circuit court judges. Am. Politics Res. 45:1003–31
    [Google Scholar]
93. Page BI, Shapiro RY 1983. Effects of public opinion on policy. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 77:175–90
    [Google Scholar]
94. Page BI, Shapiro RY 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
95. Park DK, Gelman A, Bafumi J 2004. Bayesian multilevel estimation with poststratification: state-level estimates from national polls. Political Anal 12:375–85
    [Google Scholar]
96. Paternoster R, Deise J 2011. A heavy thumb on the scale: the effect of victim impact evidence on capital decision making. Criminology 49:129–61
    [Google Scholar]
97. Peffley M, Hurwitz J 2007. Persuasion and resistance: race and the death penalty in America. Am. J. Political Sci. 51:996–1012
    [Google Scholar]
98. Pickett JT, Baker T 2014. The pragmatic American: empirical reality or methodological artifact. ? Criminology 52:195–222
    [Google Scholar]
99. Pickett JT, Mancini C, Mears DP, Gertz M 2015. Public (mis)understanding of crime policy: the effects of criminal justice experience and media reliance. Crim. Justice Policy Rev. 26:500–22
    [Google Scholar]
100. Quillian L, Pager D 2010. Estimating risk: stereotype amplification and the perceived risk of criminal victimization. Soc. Psychol. Q. 73:79–104
     [Google Scholar]
101. Ramirez MD 2013.a Punitive sentiment. Criminology 51:329–64
     [Google Scholar]
102. Ramirez MD 2013.b The polls—trends: Americans’ changing views on crime and punishment. Public Opin. Q. 77:1006–31
     [Google Scholar]
103. Reflect. Democr. Campaign. 2015. Justice for All? San Francisco, CA: Women Donor Netw https://wholeads.us/justice/
104. Rhodes SL 1990. Democratic justice: the responsiveness of prison population size to public policy preferences. Am. Political Q. 18:337–85
     [Google Scholar]
105. Roberts JV, Hough M 2005. Understanding Public Attitudes to Criminal Justice New York: Open Univ. Press
106. Roberts JV, Hough M, Jackson J, Gerber MM 2012. Public opinion towards the lay magistracy and the sentencing council guidelines: the effects of information on attitudes. Br. J. Criminol. 52:1072–91
     [Google Scholar]
107. Roberts JV, Stalans LJ 1997. Public Opinion, Crime, and Criminal Justice Boulder, CO: Westview Press
108. Roberts JV, Stalans LJ, Indermaur D, Hough M 2003. Penal Populism and Public Opinion: Lessons from Five Countries New York: Oxford Univ. Press
109. Robinson PH 2013. Intuitions of Justice and the Utility of Desert New York: Oxford Univ. Press
110. Roche SP, Pickett JT, Gertz M 2016. The scary world of online news? Internet news exposure and public attitudes toward crime and justice. J. Quant. Criminol. 32:215–36
     [Google Scholar]
111. Rossi PH, Berk RA 1997. Just Punishments: Federal Guidelines and Public Views Compared New York: Aldine de Gruyter
     [Google Scholar]
112. Sandys M, McGarrell EF 1995. Attitudes toward capital punishment: preference for the penalty or mere acceptance. ? J. Res. Crime Delinquency 32:191–213
     [Google Scholar]
113. Schneider AL 2006. Patterns of change in the use of imprisonment in the American States: an integration of path dependence, punctuated equilibrium and policy design approaches. Political Res. Q. 59:457–70
     [Google Scholar]
114. Shapiro RY 2011. Public opinion and American democracy. Public Opin. Q. 75:982–1017
     [Google Scholar]
115. Sharp EB 1999. The Sometime Connection: Public Opinion and Social Policy Albany, NY: State Univ. New York Press
     [Google Scholar]
116. Shirley KE, Gelman A 2015. Hierarchical models for estimating state and demographic trends in US death penalty public opinion. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 178:1–28
     [Google Scholar]
117. Simon J 2007. Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
118. Sklansky DA 2018. The problems with prosecutors. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 1:451–69
     [Google Scholar]
119. Smith KB 2004. The politics of punishment: evaluating political explanations of incarceration rates. J. Politics 66:925–38
     [Google Scholar]
120. Soroka SN, Wlezien C 2010. Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
121. Spelman W 2009. Crime, cash, and limited options: explaining the prison boom. Criminol. Public Policy 8:29–77
     [Google Scholar]
122. Steinberg L, Piquero AR 2010. Manipulating public opinion about trying juveniles as adults: an experimental study. Crime Delinquency 56:487–506
     [Google Scholar]
123. Stimson JA 1999. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings Boulder, CO: Westview Press. , 2nd ed..
124. Stimson JA 2004. Tides of Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
125. Stimson JA 2017. The Dyad Ratios Algorithm for Estimating Latent Public Opinion: Estimation, Testing, and Comparison to Other Approaches Work. Pap., Dep. Political Sci., Univ. North Carolina Chapel Hill:
     [Google Scholar]
126. Stimson JA, Mackuen MB, Erikson RS 1995. Dynamic representation. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 89:543–65
     [Google Scholar]
127. Thielo AJ, Cullen FT, Cohen DM, Chouhy C 2016. Rehabiliation in a red state: public support for correctional reform in Texas. Criminol. Public Policy 15:137–70
     [Google Scholar]
128. Tonry M 1995. Malign Neglect: Race, Crime, and Punishment in America New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
129. Travis J, Western B, Redburn S 2014. The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
     [Google Scholar]
130. Weissberg R 1976. Public Opinion and Popular Government Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
131. Wlezien C 1995. The public as thermostat: dynamics of preferences for spending. Am. J. Political Sci. 39:981–1000
     [Google Scholar]
132. Wlezien C 2004. Patterns of representation: dynamics of public preferences and policy. J. Politics 66:1–24
     [Google Scholar]
133. Wlezien C 2005. On the salience of political issues: the problem with ‘most important problem.’ Elect. . Stud 24:555–79
     [Google Scholar]
134. Wlezien C 2017. Public opinion and policy representation: on conceptualization, measurement, and interpretation. Policy Stud. J. 45:561–82
     [Google Scholar]
135. Wright RF 2009. How prosecutor elections fail us. Ohio State J. Crim. Law 6:581–610
     [Google Scholar]
136. Yates J, Fording R 2005. Politics and state punitiveness in black and white. J. Politics 67:1099–121
     [Google Scholar]
137. Zaller J 1992. The Nature of and Origins of Mass Opinion New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
138. Zaller J, Feldman S 1992. A simple theory of the survey response: answering questions versus revealing preferences. Am. J. Political Sci. 36:579–616
     [Google Scholar]
139. Zimring FE, Johnson DT 2006. Public opinion and the governance of punishment in democratic political systems. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 605:266–80
     [Google Scholar]