1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology
  4. Volume 3, 2021
  5. Article

Annual Review of Developmental Psychology

Volume 3, 2021

Young Children's Interactions with Objects: Play as Practice and Practice as Play

Abstract

Objects permeate human culture and saturate the imagination. This duality offers both opportunity and challenge. Here we ask how young human children learn to exploit the immense potential afforded by objects that can exist simultaneously in physical and imaginary realms. To this end, we advance a new framework that integrates the presently siloed literatures on manual skill and play development. We argue that developments in children's real and imagined use of objects are embodied, reciprocal, and intertwined. Advances in one plane of action influence and scaffold advances in the other. Consistent with this unified framework, we show how real and imagined interactions with objects are characterized by developmental parallels in how children () transcend the present to encompass future points in time and space, () extend beyond the self, and () gradually move beyond objects’ designed functions. In addition, we highlight bidirectional influences in children's real and imagined interactions with objects: Play engenders practice and skill in using objects, but just the same, practice using objects engenders advances in play. We close by highlighting the theoretical, empirical, and translational implications of this embodied and integrated account of manual skill and play development.

Keyword(s): exploration, manual skill, motor development, object manipulation, play, pretend play, tool use
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-050720-102538
2021-12-09
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/devpsych/3/1/annurev-devpsych-050720-102538.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-050720-102538&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adolph KE. 1997. Learning in the development of infant locomotion. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 62:31–158 https://doi.org/10.2307/1166199
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Adolph KE, Hoch JE. 2019. Motor development: embodied, embedded, enculturated, and enabling. Annu. Rev. Psychol 70:141–64 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102836
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrett TM, Davis EF, Needham A 2007. Learning about tools in infancy. Dev. Psychol. 43:2352–68
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Barrett TM, Needham A. 2008. Developmental differences in infants' use of an object's shape to grasp it securely. Dev. Psychobiol. 50:197–106
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Barsalou LW. 2008. Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol 59:617–45 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bates E. 1979. The biology of symbols: some concluding thoughts. The Emergence Of Symbols: Cognition and Communication in Infancy315–70 New York: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Belsky J, Goode MK, Most RK. 1980. Maternal stimulation and infant exploratory competence: cross-sectional, correlational, and experimental analyses. Child Dev 51:4):1168–78 https://doi.org/10.2307/1129558
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Belsky J, Most RK. 1981. From exploration to play: a cross-sectional study of infant free play behavior. Dev. Psychol. 17:5630–39
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bigelow AE, MacLean K, Proctor J. 2004. The role of joint attention in the development of infants’ play with objects. Dev. Sci. 7:5518–26 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00375.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bornstein MH, Tamis-LeMonda CS. 1995. Parent-child symbolic play: three theories in search of an effect. Dev. Rev. 15:4382–400
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bornstein MH, Tamis-LeMonda CS 2007. Infants at play: development, partners and functions. Introduction to Infant Development A Slater, M Lewis 253–69 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bornstein MH, Tamis-LeMonda CS, Hahn CS, Haynes OM. 2008. Maternal responsiveness to young children at three ages: longitudinal analysis of a multidimensional, modular, and specific parenting construct. Dev. Psychol 44:3867–74
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Boudreau JP, Bushnell EW. 2000. Spilling thoughts: configuring attentional resources in infants’ goal-directed actions. Infant. Behav. Dev 23:3–4543–66 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(01)00059-5
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bourgeois KS, Khawar AW, Neal SA, Lockman JJ 2005. Infant manual exploration of objects, surfaces, and their interrelations. Infancy 8:3233–52
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Boyette AH. 2019. Autonomy, cognitive development, and the socialisation of cooperation in foragers. Hunter Gatherer Res 3:3475–501 https://doi.org/10.3828/hgr.2017.23
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brand RJ, Baldwin DA, Ashburn LA 2002. Evidence for ‘motionese’: modifications in mothers’ infant-directed action. Dev. Sci. 5:172–83
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Bretherton I 1984. Representing the social world in symbolic play: reality and fantasy. Symbolic Play I Bretherton 3–41 Orlando, FL: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Bretherton I, O'Connell B, Shore C, Bates E 1984. The effect of contextual variation on symbolic play development from 20 to 28 months. Symbolic Play I Bretherton 271–98 Orlando, FL: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Bruner J 1978. The role of dialogue in language acquisition. The Child's Conception of Language A Sinclair, RJ Jarvella, WJM Levelt 241–56 Berlin: Springer Verlag
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Bushnell EW, Boudreau JP. 1993. Motor development and the mind: the potential role of motor abilities as a determinant of aspects of perceptual development. Child Dev 64:41005–21
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Bushnell EW, Boudreau JP 1998. Exploring and exploiting objects with the hands during infancy. The Psychobiology of the Hand K Connolly 144–61 Cambridge, UK: Mac Keith Press
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Cameron CE, Cottone EA, Murrah WM, Grissmer DW. 2016. How are motor skills linked to children's school performance and academic achievement?. Child Dev. Perspect. 10:293–98 https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12168
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  23. Campbell SB, Mahoney AS, Northrup J, Moore EL, Leezenbaum NB, Brownell CA 2018. Developmental changes in pretend play from 22- to 34-months in younger siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 46:3639–54
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Clearfield MW. 2019. Play for success: an intervention to boost object exploration in infants from low-income households. Infant. Behav. Dev. 55:112–22
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Chu J, Schulz LE 2020. Play, curiosity, and cognition. Annu. Rev. Dev. Psychol. 2:317–43
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Damast AM, Tamis-LeMonda CS, Bornstein MH. 1996. Mother-child play: sequential interactions and the relation between maternal beliefs and behaviors. Child Dev 67:41752–66
     [Google Scholar]
  27. de Barbaro K, Johnson CM, Forster D, Deák GO 2016. Sensorimotor decoupling contributes to triadic attention: a longitudinal investigation of mother-infant-object interactions. Child Dev 87:2494–512
     [Google Scholar]
  28. De Resende BD, Ottoni EB, Fragaszy DM 2008. Ontogeny of manipulative behavior and nut-cracking in young tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): a perception–action perspective. Dev. Sci. 11:6828–40 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00731.x
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Defeyter MA, German TP. 2003. Acquiring an understanding of design: evidence from children's insight problem solving. Cognition 89:133–55
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Delgado-Gaitan C, Trueba H. 1991. Crossing Cultural Borders: Education for Immigrant Families in America Bristol, PA: Falmer Press
  31. DeLoache JS. 2004. Becoming symbol-minded. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8:266–70
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Diamond A. 1990. Developmental time course in human infants and infant monkeys, and the neural bases of, inhibitory control in reaching. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 608:1637–76 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb48913.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  33. Duncker K. 1945. On problem-solving. Psychol. Monogr. 58:5i–113
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Farver JM, Howes C. 1993. Cultural differences in American and Mexican mother-child pretend play. Merrill-Palmer Q 39:344–58
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Fein GG. 1981. Pretend play in childhood: an integrative review. Child Dev 52:1095–118
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Fenson L, Kagan J, Kearsley R, Zelazo P. 1976. The developmental progression of manipulative play in the first two years. Child Dev 47:1232–36
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Fenson L, Ramsay DS. 1980. Decentration and integration of the child's play in the second year. Child Dev 51:171–78
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Fletcher KK, Cates CB, Mendelsohn AL, Tamis-LeMonda CS. 2020. Play in Mexican-American mothers and toddlers is frequent, multimodal, and rich in symbolic content. Infancy 25:5535–51 https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12344
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  39. Fletcher K, West K, Wang Y, Tamis-LeMonda CS. 2021. Characterizing the spaces and places of infants' everyday play Poster presented at the Society for Research in Child Development online, Apr .
  40. Fontenelle SA, Kahrs BA, Neal SA, Newton AT, Lockman JJ 2007. Infant manual exploration of composite substrates. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 98:3153–67
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Garvey C. 1990. Play Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 2nd ed..
  42. Gesell A, Amatruda CS. 1941. Developmental Diagnosis: Normal and Abnormal Child Development New York: Hoeber
  43. Gibson EJ. 1982. The concept of affordances in development: the renascence of functionalism. The Concept of Development: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology 15 WA Collins 55–81 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Gibson EJ, Pick AD. 2000. An Ecological Approach to Perceptual Learning and Development New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  45. Gibson EJ, Riccio G, Schmuckler MA, Stoffregen TA, Rosenberg D, Taormina J. 1987. Detection of the traversability of surfaces by crawling and walking infants. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 13:4533–44 https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.13.4.533
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  46. Gibson JJ. 1962. Observations on active touch. Psychol. Rev. 69:6477–91 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046962
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  47. Gibson JJ. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin
  48. Gillespie A, Zittoun T. 2010. Using resources: conceptualizing the mediation and reflective use of tools and signs. Cult. Psychol. 16:137–62
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Gopnik A, Walker CM. 2013. Considering counterfactuals: the relationship between causal learning and pretend play. Am. J. Play 6:115–28
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Groos K. 1898. The Play of Animals New York: Appleton
  51. Hafford C. 2010. Sibling caretaking in immigrant families: understanding cultural practices to inform child welfare practice and evaluation. Eval. Program Plan. 33:3294–302
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Haight W, Miller PJ 1992. The development of everyday pretend play: a longitudinal study of mothers' participation. Merrill-Palmer Q 38:331–49
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Harris PL. 2021. Early constraints on the imagination: the realism of young children. Child Dev 92:466–83 https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13487
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  54. Heathcock JC, Lockman JJ. 2019. Infant and child development: innovations and foundations for rehabilitation. Phys. Ther. 99:643–46
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Herzberg O, Fletcher K, Schatz J, Adolph K, Tamis-LeMonda CS 2021. Infant exuberance object play at home: immense amounts of time-distributed, variable practice. Child Dev In press
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Hoff E. 2013. Language Development Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learn.
  57. Hopkins EJ, Smith ED, Weisberg DS, Lillard AS. 2016. The development of substitute object pretense: the differential importance of form and function. J. Cogn. Dev. 17:2197–220
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Inoue-Nakamura N, Matsuzawa T. 1997. Development of stone tool use by wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J. Comp. Psychol. 111:2159–73 https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.111.2.159
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  59. Jayaraman S, Fausey CM, Smith LB. 2013. Visual statistics of infants’ ordered experiences. J. Vis. 13:735
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Jung WP, Kahrs BA, Lockman JJ. 2015. Manual action, fitting, and spatial planning: relating objects by young children. Cognition 134:128–39
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Jung WP, Kahrs BA, Lockman JJ. 2018. Fitting handled objects into apertures by 17- to 36-month-old children: the dynamics of spatial coordination. Dev. Psychol. 54:2228–39
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Kahrs BA, Jung WP, Lockman JJ 2012. What is the role of infant banging in the development of tool use?. Exp. Brain Res. 218:2315–20
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Kahrs BA, Jung WP, Lockman JJ 2013. Motor origins of tool use. Child Dev 84:3810–16
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Kahrs BA, Jung WP, Lockman JJ 2014. When does tool use become distinctively human? Hammering in young children. Child Dev 85:31050–61
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Kahrs BA, Lockman JJ. 2014. Building tool use from object manipulation: a perception-action perspective. Ecol. Psychol. 26:1–288–97 https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2014.874908
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kaplan B, Rachwani J, Tamis-LeMonda CS, Adolph KE. 2021. Deceptively simple: the perceptual-motor and social factors in children's learning of the designed actions of objects Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, online, Apr .
  67. Karasik LB, Schneider JL, Kuchirko YA, Tamis-LeMonda CS. 2018. Not so WEIRD object play in Tajikistan Paper presented at the Meeting of the International Congress on Infant Studies Philadelphia, PA: June
  68. Kenward B, Rutz C, Weir AA, Kacelnik A. 2006. Development of tool use in New Caledonian crows: inherited action patterns and social influences. Anim. Behav. 72:61329–43 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.04.007
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kimmerle M, Ferre CL, Kotwica KA, Michel GF. 2010. Development of role-differentiated bimanual manipulation during the infant's first year. Dev. Psychobiol. 52:2168–80 https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20428
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  70. Köhler W. 1929. An old pseudoproblem. Naturwissenschaften 17:395–401
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Koterba EA, Iverson JM. 2009. Investigating motionese: the effect of infant-directed action on infants’ attention and object exploration. Infant. Behav. Dev. 32:4437–44
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Kretch KS, Adolph KE. 2017. The organization of exploratory behaviors in infant locomotor planning. Dev. Sci. 20:4e12421 https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12421
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  73. Lakoff G, Johnson M. 1980. The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cogn. Sci. 4:2195–208
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Lancy DF 2016. Ethnographic perspectives on culture acquisition. Childhood: Origins, Evolution, and Implications CL Meehan, AN Crittenden 173–95 Albuquerque: Univ. N. M. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Lederman SJ, Klatzky RL. 1987. Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition. Cogn. Psychol. 19:3342–68
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Leslie AM. 1987. Pretense and representation: the origins of “theory of mind. .” Psychol. Rev. 94:412–26
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Libertus K, Joh AS, Needham AW. 2016. Motor training at 3 months affects object exploration 12 months later. Dev. Sci. 19:31058–66 https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12370
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. Lillard A, Nishida T, Massaro D, Vaish A, Ma L, McRoberts G 2007. Signs of pretense across age and scenario. Infancy 11:11–30
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Lillard AS. 1993. Pretend play skills and the child's theory of mind. Child Dev 64:2348–71
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Lillard AS 2011. Mother-child fantasy play. The Oxford Handbook of Development of Play P Nathan, AD Pelligrini 284–95 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Lillard AS. 2013. Playful learning and Montessori education. NAMTA J 38:2137–74
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Lillard AS 2015. The development of play. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science 2 RM Lerner 425–68 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 7th ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Lillard AS, Pinkham AM, Smith E 2011. Pretend play and cognitive development. The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development, ed. U Goswami 285–311 New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Little EE, Carver LJ, Legare CH. 2016. Cultural variation in triadic infant–caregiver object exploration. Child Dev 87:41130–45
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Lobo MA, Hall ML, Greenspan B, Rohloff P, Prosser LA, Smith BA. 2019. Wearables for pediatric rehabilitation: how to optimally design and use products to meet the needs of users. Phys. Ther. 99:647–57
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Lockman JJ. 1984. The development of detour ability during infancy. Child Dev 55:482–91
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Lockman JJ. 2000. A perception–action perspective on tool use development. Child Dev 71:1137–44
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Lockman JJ, Adams CD. 2001. Going around transparent and grid-like barriers: detour ability as a perception–action skill. Dev. Sci. 4:4463–71 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00188
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  89. Lockman JJ, Kahrs BA. 2017. New insights into the development of human tool use. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 26:4330–34
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Lockman JJ, McHale JP 1989. Object manipulation in infancy. Action in Social Context JJ Lockman, NL Hazen 129–67 New York: Plenum
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Matthews A, Ellis AE, Nelson CA. 1996. Development of preterm and full-term infant ability on AB, recall memory, transparent barrier detour, and means-end tasks. Child Dev 67:62658–76 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01881.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  92. Maynard AE, Greenfield PM. 2003. Implicit cognitive development in cultural tools and children: lessons from Maya Mexico. Cogn. Dev. 18:4489–510
     [Google Scholar]
  93. McCarty ME, Clifton RK, Collard RR 2001. The beginnings of tool use by infants and toddlers. Infancy 2:2233–56
     [Google Scholar]
  94. McCune L. 1995. A normative study of representational play in the transition to language. Dev. Psychol. 31:2198–206
     [Google Scholar]
  95. McCune-Nicolich L. 1981. Toward symbolic functioning: structure of early pretend games and potential parallels with language. Child Dev 52:785–97
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Morgante JD, Keen R. 2008. Vision and action: the effect of visual feedback on infants’ exploratory behaviors. Infant. Behav. Dev. 31:4729–33
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Müller U, Yeung E, Hutchison SM 2013. The role of distancing in Werner and Kaplan's account of symbol formation and beyond. Cult. Psychol. 19:4463–83 https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X13500323
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  98. Musgrave S, Lonsdorf E, Morgan D, Sanz C 2021. The ontogeny of termite gathering among chimpanzees in the Guaolougo Triangle, Republic of Congo. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 174:187–200
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Needham AW. 2016. Learning About Objects in Infancy New York: Routledge
  100. Norman DA. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things New York: Basic Books. Revis. ed.
  101. O'Connell B, Bretherton I 1984. Toddler's play, alone and with mother: the role of maternal guidance. Symbolic Play I Bretherton 337–68 Orlando, FL: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Orr E, Geva R. 2015. Symbolic play and language development. Infant. Behav. Dev. 38:147–61
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Palmer CF. 1989. The discriminating nature of infants' exploratory actions. Dev. Psychol. 25:6885–93
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Piaget J. 1945. Play, Dreams, and Imitation in Childhood New York: Norton
  105. Piaget J. 1952. The Origins of Intelligence in Children New York: W.W. Norton https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-000
    [Crossref]
  106. Quinn S, Donnelly S, Kidd E. 2018. The relationship between symbolic play and language acquisition: a meta-analytic review. Dev. Rev. 49:121–35
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Quinn S, Kidd E 2018. Symbolic play promotes non-verbal communicative exchanges in infant–caregiver dyads. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 37:33–50 https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12251
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  108. Rachwani J, Kaplan BE, Tamis-LeMonda CS, Adolph KE. 2021. Children's use of everyday artifacts: learning the hidden affordances of zipping. Dev. Psychobiol. 63:793–99 https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.22049
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  109. Rachwani J, Tamis-LeMonda CS, Lockman JJ, Karasik LB, Adolph KE. 2020. Learning the designed actions of everyday objects. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 149:167–78 https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000631
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  110. Rips LJ, Hespos SJ. 2015. Divisions of the physical world: concepts of objects and substances. Psychol. Bull. 141:4786–811
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Rogoff B. 1990. Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  112. Rogoff B. 2003. The Cultural Nature of Human Development New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  113. Rogoff B, Mistry J, Göncü A, Mosier C 1993. Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 58:1–179
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Ruff HA. 1984. Infants' manipulative exploration of objects: effects of age and object characteristics. Dev. Psychol. 20:19–20
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Rutz C, Klump BC, Komarczyk L, Leighton R, Kramer J et al. 2016. Discovery of species-wide tool use in the Hawaiian crow. Nature 537:403–7
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Slade A. 1987. Quality of attachment and early symbolic play. Dev. Psychol. 23:178–85
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Smith LB, Yu C, Yoshida H, Fausey KM 2015. Contributions of head-mounted cameras to studying the visual environments of infants and young children. J. Cogn. Dev. 16:3407–19
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Stahl AE, Feigenson L. 2015. Observing the unexpected enhances infants’ learning and exploration. Science 348:623091–94
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Stahl AE, Feigenson L. 2018. Infants use linguistic group distinctions to chunk items in memory. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 172:149–67 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.005
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  120. Sutherland SL, Friedman O. 2013. Just pretending can be really learning: Children use pretend play as a source for acquiring generic knowledge. Dev. Psychol. 49:91660–68
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Sweller J. 2011. Cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 55 JP Mestre, BH Ross 37–76 Cambridge, UK: Elsevier https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  122. Tamis-LeMonda C, Bornstein MH 1996. Variation in children's exploratory, nonsymbolic, and symbolic play: an explanatory multidimensional framework. Advances in Infancy Research C Rovee-Collier, L Lipsitt 37–78 New York: Ablex Publishers
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Tamis-LeMonda CS, Bornstein MH. 1991. Individual variation, correspondence, stability, and change in mother and toddler play. Infant. Behav. Dev. 14:2143–62
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Tamis-LeMonda CS, Bornstein MH. 1993. Play and its relations to other mental functions in the child. New Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev. 1993.5917–28
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Tamis-LeMonda CS, Kuchirko Y, Tafuro L 2013. From action to interaction: Infant object exploration and mothers' contingent responsiveness. IEEE Trans. Auton. Ment. Dev. 5:3202–9
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Tamis-LeMonda CS, Lockman JJ 2020. Infant object manipulation and play. The Cambridge Handbook of Infant Development JJ Lockman, CS Tamis-LeMonda 520–48 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Tamis-LeMonda CS, Schatz J 2019. Learning language in the context of play. International Handbook of Language Development J Horst, J von Koss, K Torkildsen 442–61 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Tan AWY. 2017. From play to proficiency: the ontogeny of stone-tool use in coastal-foraging long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) from a comparative perception-action perspective. J. Comp. Psychol. 131:289–114
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Thelen E. 1981. Rhythmical behavior in infancy: an ethological perspective. Dev. Psychol. 17:3237–57 https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.17.3.237
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  130. Turvey MT. 1996. Dynamic touch. Am. Psychol. 51:1134–52
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Uzgiris IC. 1976. Organization of sensorimotor intelligence. Origins of Intelligence M Lewis 123–63 Boston, MA: Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6961-5_5
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  132. von Hofsten C. 1993. Prospective control: a basic aspect of action development. Hum. Dev. 36:253–70
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Vygotsky LS. 1967. Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Sov. Psychol. 5:36–18
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Weisberg DS, Bloom P. 2009. Young children separate multiple pretend worlds. Dev. Sci. 12:699–705
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Weisberg DS, Hirsh-Pasek K, Golinkoff RM, Kittredge AK, Klahr D. 2016. Guided play: principles and practices. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 25:177–82
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Werner H, Kaplan B. 1963. Symbol Formation Oxford, UK: Wiley
  137. Zukow PG 1989. Siblings as effective socializing agents: evidence from Central Mexico. Sibling Interaction Across Cultures PG Zukow 79–105 New York: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-050720-102538
Loading
Young Children's Interactions with Objects: Play as Practice and Practice as Play
Annual Review of Developmental Psychology 3, 165 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-050720-102538
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-050720-102538
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-050720-102538
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error