Behavioral Isolation and Incipient Speciation in Birds

Literature Cited

1. Albert AY, Otto SP 2005. Sexual selection can resolve sex-linked sexual antagonism. Science 310:119–21
   [Google Scholar]
2. Andersson M. 1994. Sexual Selection Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
3. Baack E, Melo MC, Rieseberg LH, Ortiz‐Barrientos D 2015. The origins of reproductive isolation in plants. New Phytol. 207:968–84
   [Google Scholar]
4. Badyaev AV, Young RL, Oh KP, Addison C 2008. Evolution on a local scale: developmental, functional, and genetic bases of divergence in bill form and associated changes in song structure between adjacent habitats. Evolution 62:1951–64
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baker MC. 1983. The behavioral response of female Nuttall's white-crowned sparrows to male song of natal and alien dialects. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12:309–15
   [Google Scholar]
6. Baker MC. 1991. Response to male indigo and lazuli buntings and their hybrids to song playback in allopatric and sympatric populations. Behaviour 119:225–42
   [Google Scholar]
7. Baker MC, Baker AEM 1990. Reproductive behavior of female buntings: isolating mechanisms in a hybridizing pair of species. Evolution 44:332–38
   [Google Scholar]
8. Baker MC, Bjerke TK, Lampe HU, Espmark YO 1987a. Sexual response of female yellowhammers to differences in regional song dialects and repertoire sizes. Anim. Behav. 35:395–401
   [Google Scholar]
9. Baker MC, Spitler-Nabors KJ, Thompson AD, Cunningham MA 1987b. Reproductive behaviour of female white-crowned sparrows: effect of dialects and synthetic hybrid songs. Anim. Behav. 35:1766–74
   [Google Scholar]
10. Balaban E. 1988. Bird song syntax: learned intraspecific variation is meaningful. PNAS 85:3657–60
    [Google Scholar]
11. Baldassarre DT, Webster MS 2013. Experimental evidence that extra-pair mating drives asymmetrical introgression of a sexual trait. Proc. R. Soc. B 280:20132175
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ballentine B, Horton B, Brown ET, Greenberg R 2013. Divergent selection on bill morphology contributes to nonrandom mating between swamp sparrow subspecies. Anim. Behav. 86:467–73
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ballentine B, Searcy WA, Nowicki S 2008. Reliable aggressive signalling in swamp sparrows. Anim. Behav. 75:693–703
    [Google Scholar]
14. Baptista LF, Schuchmann KL 1990. Song learning in the Anna hummingbird (Calypte anna). Ethology 84:15–26
    [Google Scholar]
15. Barraclough TG, Harvey PH, Nee S 1995. Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 259:211–15
    [Google Scholar]
16. Barrera-Guzmán AO, Aleixo A, Shawkey MD, Weir JT 2017. Hybrid speciation leads to novel male secondary sexual ornamentation of an Amazonian bird. PNAS 115:E218–25
    [Google Scholar]
17. Barton NH, Hewitt GM 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:113–48
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bearhop S, Fiedler W, Furness RW, Votier SC, Waldron S et al. 2005. Assortative mating as a mechanism for rapid evolution of a migratory divide. Science 310:502–4
    [Google Scholar]
19. Benkman CW. 2003. Divergent selection drives the adaptive radiation of crossbills. Evolution 57:1176–81
    [Google Scholar]
20. Bensch S, Akesson S, Irwin DE 2002. The use of AFLP to find an informative SNP: genetic differences across a migratory divide in willow warblers. Mol. Ecol. 11:2359–66
    [Google Scholar]
21. Bernal XE, Rand AS, Ryan MJ 2007. Sex differences in response to nonconspecific advertisement calls: receiver permissiveness in male and female túngara frogs. Anim. Behav. 73:955–64
    [Google Scholar]
22. Berthold P, Querner U 1981. Genetic basis of migratory behavior in European warblers. Science 212:77–79
    [Google Scholar]
23. Brainard MS, Doupe AJ 2013. Translating birdsong: songbirds as a model for basic and applied medical research. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36:489–517
    [Google Scholar]
24. Brelsford A, Irwin DE 2009. Incipient speciation despite little assortative mating: the yellow‐rumped warbler hybrid zone. Evolution 63:3050–60
    [Google Scholar]
25. Catchpole CK, Slater PJ 2003. Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press
26. Charlesworth B, Coyne J, Barton N 1987. The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am. Nat. 130:113–46
    [Google Scholar]
27. Claramunt S, Derryberry EP, Remsen J, Brumfield RT 2012. High dispersal ability inhibits speciation in a continental radiation of passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 279:1567–74
    [Google Scholar]
28. Clayton N. 1990. Assortative mating in zebra finch subspecies, Taeniopygia guttata and T. g. castanotis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 330:351–70
    [Google Scholar]
29. Cooke F, Finney G, Rockwell R 1976. Assortative mating in lesser snow geese (Anser caerulescens). Behav. Genet. 6:127–40
    [Google Scholar]
30. Cooke F, McNally C 1975. Mate selection and colour preferences in lesser snow geese. Behaviour 53:151–69
    [Google Scholar]
31. Cooper EA, Uy JAC 2017. Genomic evidence for convergent evolution of a key trait underlying divergence in island birds. Mol. Ecol. 26:3760–74
    [Google Scholar]
32. Coyne JA, Orr HA 1997. “Patterns of speciation in Drosophila” revisited. Evolution 51:295–303
    [Google Scholar]
33. Coyne JA, Orr HA 2004. Speciation Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
34. Cramer ER, Ålund M, McFarlane SE, Johnsen A, Qvarnström A 2016. Females discriminate against heterospecific sperm in a natural hybrid zone. Evolution 70:1844–55
    [Google Scholar]
35. Curry CM, Patten MA 2016. Shadow of a doubt: premating and postmating isolating barriers in a temporally complex songbird (Passeriformes: Paridae) hybrid zone. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 70:1171–86
    [Google Scholar]
36. Danner JE, Danner RM, Bonier F, Martin PR, Small TW, Moore IT 2011. Female, but not male, tropical sparrows respond more strongly to the local song dialect: implications for population divergence. Am. Nat. 178:53–63
    [Google Scholar]
37. Darwin C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex London: John Murray
38. Delmore KE, Irwin DE 2014. Hybrid songbirds employ intermediate routes in a migratory divide. Ecol. Lett. 17:1211–18
    [Google Scholar]
39. Delmore KE, Kenyon HL, Germain RR, Irwin DE 2015. Phenotypic divergence during speciation is inversely associated with differences in seasonal migration. Proc. R. Soc. B 282:20151921
    [Google Scholar]
40. Delmore KE, Liedvogel M 2016. Investigating factors that generate and maintain variation in migratory orientation: a primer for recent and future work. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 10:3
    [Google Scholar]
41. Delmore KE, Toews DPL, Germain RR, Owens GL, Irwin DE 2016. The genetics of seasonal migration and plumage color. Curr. Biol. 26:2167–73
    [Google Scholar]
42. Dobzhansky T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species New York: Columbia Univ. Press
43. Edwards SV, Kingan SB, Calkins JD, Balakrishnan CN, Jennings WB et al. 2005. Speciation in birds: genes, geography, and sexual selection. PNAS 102:6550–57
    [Google Scholar]
44. Elgvin TO, Trier CN, Tørresen OK, Hagen IJ, Lien S et al. 2017. The genomic mosaicism of hybrid speciation. Sci. Adv. 3:e1602996
    [Google Scholar]
45. Ellegren H. 2009. A selection model of molecular evolution incorporating the effective population size. Evolution 63:301–5
    [Google Scholar]
46. Feldman MW, Laland KN 1996. Gene-culture coevolutionary theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:453–57
    [Google Scholar]
47. Freeman BG, Montgomery GA 2017. Using song playback experiments to measure species recognition between geographically isolated populations: a comparison with acoustic trait analyses. Auk 134:857–70
    [Google Scholar]
48. Gee JM. 2003. How a hybrid zone is maintained: behavioral mechanisms of interbreeding between California and Gambel's quail (Callipepla californica and C. gambelii. ) Evolution 57:2407–15
    [Google Scholar]
49. Grant BR, Grant PR 1996. Cultural inheritance of song and its role in the evolution of Darwin's finches. Evolution 50:2471–87
    [Google Scholar]
50. Grant PR, Grant BR 1992. Hybridization of bird species. Science 256:193–97
    [Google Scholar]
51. Grant PR, Grant BR 1997. Mating patterns of Darwin's finch hybrids determined by song and morphology. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 60:317–43
    [Google Scholar]
52. Grant PR, Grant BR 2007. How and Why Species Multiply: The Radiation of Darwin's Finches Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
53. Greig EI, Baldassarre DT, Webster MS 2015. Differential rates of phenotypic introgression are associated with male behavioral responses to multiple signals. Evolution 69:2602–12
    [Google Scholar]
54. Greig EI, Webster MS 2013. Spatial decoupling of song and plumage generates novel phenotypes between two avian subspecies. Behav. Ecol. 24:1004–13
    [Google Scholar]
55. Groth JG. 1993. Evolutionary Differentiation in Morphology, Vocalizations, and Allozymes Among Nomadic Sibling Species in the North American Red Crossbill (Loxia curvirostra) Complex Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
56. Hauber ME, Russo SA, Sherman PW 2001. A password for species recognition in a brood-parasitic bird. Proc. R. Soc. B 268:1041–48
    [Google Scholar]
57. Helbig A. 1996. Genetic basis, mode of inheritance and evolutionary changes of migratory directions in palaearctic warblers (Aves: Sylviidae). J. Exp. Biol. 199:49–55
    [Google Scholar]
58. Hill GE. 1994. Geographic variation in male ornamentation and female mate preference in the house finch: a comparative test of models of sexual selection. Behav. Ecol. 5:64–73
    [Google Scholar]
59. Hinde RA. 1959. Behaviour and speciation in birds and lower vertebrates. Biol. Rev. 34:85–127
    [Google Scholar]
60. Huang H, Rabosky DL 2014. Sexual selection and diversification: reexamining the correlation between dichromatism and speciation rate in birds. Am. Nat. 184:E101–14
    [Google Scholar]
61. Hubbard JK, Uy JAC, Hauber ME, Hoekstra HE, Safran RJ 2010. Vertebrate pigmentation: from underlying genes to adaptive function. Trends Genet 26:231–40
    [Google Scholar]
62. Irwin DE. 2018. Sex chromosomes and speciation in birds and other ZW systems. Mol. Ecol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14537
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
63. Irwin DE, Irwin JH 2005. Siberian migratory divides. Birds of Two Worlds: The Ecology and Evolution of Migration R Greenberg, P Marra 27–40 Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
64. Irwin DE, Price T 1999. Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation. Heredity 82:347–54
    [Google Scholar]
65. Kaneshiro KY. 1980. Sexual isolation, speciation and direction of evolution. Evolution 34:437–44
    [Google Scholar]
66. Kennedy JD, Borregaard MK, Jønsson KA, Marki PZ, Fjeldså J, Rahbek C 2016. The influence of wing morphology upon the dispersal, geographical distributions and diversification of the Corvides (Aves: Passeriformes). Proc. R. Soc. B 283:20161922
    [Google Scholar]
67. Kenyon HL, Alcaide M, Toews DPL, Irwin DE 2017. Cultural isolation is greater than genetic isolation across an avian hybrid zone. J. Evol. Biol. 30:81–95
    [Google Scholar]
68. King AP, West MJ 1977. Species identification in the North American cowbird: appropriate responses to abnormal song. Science 195:1002–4
    [Google Scholar]
69. King AP, West MJ, Eastzer DH 1980. Song structure and song development as potential contributors to reproductive isolation in cowbirds (Molothrus ater). J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 94:1028
    [Google Scholar]
70. Kirschel AN, Blumstein DT, Smith TB 2009. Character displacement of song and morphology in African tinkerbirds. PNAS 106:8256–61
    [Google Scholar]
71. Kleindorfer S, O'Connor JA, Dudaniec RY, Myers SA, Robertson J, Sulloway FJ 2014. Species collapse via hybridization in Darwin's tree finches. Am. Nat. 183:325–41
    [Google Scholar]
72. Kroodsma D, Hamilton D, Sánchez JE, Byers BE, Fandiño-Mariño H et al. 2013. Behavioral evidence for song learning in the suboscine bellbirds (Procnias spp.; Cotingidae). Wilson J. Ornithol. 125:1–14
    [Google Scholar]
73. Kulahci IG, Dornhaus A, Papaj DR 2008. Multimodal signals enhance decision making in foraging bumble-bees. Proc. R. Soc. B 275:797–802
    [Google Scholar]
74. Lackey A, Boughman J 2013. Divergent sexual selection via male competition: Ecology is key. J. Evol. Biol. 26:1611–24
    [Google Scholar]
75. Lamichhaney S, Fan G, Widemo F, Gunnarsson U, Thalmann DS et al. 2016. Structural genomic changes underlie alternative reproductive strategies in the ruff (Philomachus pugnax). Nat. Genet. 48:84–88
    [Google Scholar]
76. Lamichhaney S, Han F, Webster MT, Andersson L, Grant BR, Grant PR 2017. Rapid hybrid speciation in Darwin's finches. Science 359:224–28
    [Google Scholar]
77. Langin KM, Sillett TS, Funk WC, Morrison SA, Desrosiers MA, Ghalambor CK 2015. Islands within an island: repeated adaptive divergence in a single population. Evolution 69:653–65
    [Google Scholar]
78. Langin KM, Sillett TS, Morrison SA, Ghalambor CK 2017. Bill morphology and neutral genetic structure both predict variation in acoustic signals within a bird population. Behav. Ecol. 28:866–73
    [Google Scholar]
79. Liedvogel M, Larson KW, Lundberg M, Gursoy A, Wassenaar LI et al. 2014. No evidence for assortative mating within a willow warbler migratory divide. Front. Zool. 11:52
    [Google Scholar]
80. Lipshutz SE, Overcast IA, Hickerson MJ, Brumfield RT, Derryberry EP 2017. Behavioural response to song and genetic divergence in two subspecies of white‐crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys). Mol. Ecol. 26:3011–27
    [Google Scholar]
81. López-Rull I, Lifshitz N, Garcia CM, Graves JA, Torres R 2016. Females of a polymorphic seabird dislike foreign-looking males. Anim. Behav. 113:31–38
    [Google Scholar]
82. Lundberg M, Liedvogel M, Larson K, Sigeman H, Grahn M et al. 2017. Genetic differences between willow warbler migratory phenotypes are few and cluster in large haplotype blocks. Evol. Lett. 1:155–68
    [Google Scholar]
83. Lyon BE, Eadie JM 1991. Mode of development and interspecific avian brood parasitism. Behav. Ecol. 2:309–18
    [Google Scholar]
84. Mank JE, Nam K, Ellegren H 2009. Faster-Z evolution is predominantly due to genetic drift. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27:661–70
    [Google Scholar]
85. Marshall JL, Arnold ML, Howard DJ 2002. Reinforcement: the road not taken. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:558–63
    [Google Scholar]
86. Mason NA, Burns KJ, Tobias JA, Claramunt S, Seddon N, Derryberry EP 2017. Song evolution, speciation, and vocal learning in passerine birds. Evolution 71:786–96
    [Google Scholar]
87. Mayr E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species New York: Columbia Univ. Press
88. McEntee JP, Peñalba JV, Werema C, Mulungu E, Mbilinyi M et al. 2016. Social selection parapatry in Afrotropical sunbirds. Evolution 70:1307–21
    [Google Scholar]
89. Mead LS, Arnold SJ 2004. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:264–71
    [Google Scholar]
90. Mortega KG, Flinks H, Helm B 2014. Behavioural response of a migratory songbird to geographic variation in song and morphology. Front. Zool. 11:85
    [Google Scholar]
91. Mundinger PC. 1982. Microgeographic and macrogeographic variation in the acquired vocalizations of birds. Acoustic Communication in Birds I DE Kroodsma, EH Miller, H Quellet 147–208 New York: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
92. Mundinger PC, Lahti DC 2014. Quantitative integration of genetic factors in the learning and production of canary song. Proc. R. Soc. B 281:20132631
    [Google Scholar]
93. Nelson DA, Soha JA 2004. Male and female white-crowned sparrows respond differently to geographic variation in song. Behaviour 141:53–69
    [Google Scholar]
94. Nicolakakis N, Sol D, Lefebvre L 2003. Behavioural flexibility predicts species richness in birds, but not extinction risk. Anim. Behav. 65:445–52
    [Google Scholar]
95. Nottebohm F. 1972. The origins of vocal learning. Am. Nat. 106:116–40
    [Google Scholar]
96. Ottenburghs J, Kraus RH, Hooft P, Wieren SE, Ydenberg RC, Prins HH 2017. Avian introgression in the genomic era. Avian Res 8:30
    [Google Scholar]
97. Patten MA, Rotenberry JT, Zuk M 2004. Habitat selection, acoustic adaptation, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Evolution 58:2144–55
    [Google Scholar]
98. Payne RB, Payne LL, Woods JL 1998. Song learning in brood-parasitic indigobirds Vidua chalybeata: song mimicry of the host species. Anim. Behav. 55:1537–53
    [Google Scholar]
99. Payne RB, Payne LL, Woods JL, Sorenson MD 2000. Imprinting and the origin of parasite–host species associations in brood-parasitic indigobirds, Vidua chalybeata. Anim. Behav. 59:69–81
    [Google Scholar]
100. Pearson SF, Rohwer S 2000. Asymmetries in male aggression across an avian hybrid zone. Behav. Ecol. 11:93–101
     [Google Scholar]
101. Phillimore AB, Freckleton RP, Orme CDL, Owens IP 2006. Ecology predicts large-scale patterns of phylogenetic diversification in birds. Am. Nat. 168:220–29
     [Google Scholar]
102. Podos J. 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature 409:185–88
     [Google Scholar]
103. Poelstra JW, Vijay N, Bossu CM, Lantz H, Ryll B et al. 2014. The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science 344:1410–14
     [Google Scholar]
104. Presgraves DC. 2002. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in Lepidoptera. Evolution 56:1168–83
     [Google Scholar]
105. Price T. 2007. Speciation in Birds Greenwood Village, CO: Roberts & Co
106. Price TD. 2002. Domesticated birds as a model for the genetics of speciation by sexual selection. Genetica 116:311–27
     [Google Scholar]
107. Price TD, Bouvier MM 2002. The evolution of F-1 postzygotic incompatibilities in birds. Evolution 56:2083–89
     [Google Scholar]
108. Pryke SR. 2010. Sex chromosome linkage of mate preference and color signal maintains assortative mating between interbreeding finch morphs. Evolution 64:1301–10
     [Google Scholar]
109. Pryke SR, Griffith SC 2007. The relative role of male vs. female mate choice in maintaining assortative pairing among discrete colour morphs. J. Evol. Biol. 20:1512–21
     [Google Scholar]
110. Pryke SR, Griffith SC 2009. Postzygotic genetic incompatibility between sympatric color morphs. Evolution 63:793–98
     [Google Scholar]
111. Qvarnström A, Haavie J, Saether S, Eriksson D, Pärt T 2006. Song similarity predicts hybridization in flycatchers. J. Evol. Biol. 19:1202–9
     [Google Scholar]
112. Ratcliffe LM, Grant PR 1983. Species recognition in Darwin's finches (Geospiza, Gould). II. Geographic variation in mate preference. Anim. Behav. 31:1154–65
     [Google Scholar]
113. Ravinet M, Faria R, Butlin R, Galindo J, Bierne N et al. 2017. Interpreting the genomic landscape of speciation: a road map for finding barriers to gene flow. J. Evol. Biol. 30:1450–77
     [Google Scholar]
114. Ritchie MG. 2007. Sexual selection and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38:79–102
     [Google Scholar]
115. Rohwer S, Irwin DE 2011. Molt, orientation, and avian speciation. Auk 128:419–25
     [Google Scholar]
116. Rolshausen G, Segelbacher G, Hobson KA, Schaefer HM 2009. Contemporary evolution of reproductive isolation and phenotypic divergence in sympatry along a migratory divide. Curr. Biol. 19:2097–101
     [Google Scholar]
117. Rowley I, Chapman G 1986. Cross-fostering, imprinting and learning in two sympatric species of cockatoo. Behaviour 96:1–16
     [Google Scholar]
118. Ruegg KC, Smith TB 2002. Not as the crow flies: a historical explanation for circuitous migration in Swainson's thrush (Catharus ustulatus). Proc. R. Soc. B 269:1375–81
     [Google Scholar]
119. Sæther SA, Sætre G-P, Borge T, Wiley C, Svedin N et al. 2007. Sex chromosome-linked species recognition and evolution of reproductive isolation in flycatchers. Science 318:95–97
     [Google Scholar]
120. Sætre G-P, Saether SA 2010. Ecology and genetics of speciation in Ficedula flycatchers. Mol. Ecol. 19:1091–106
     [Google Scholar]
121. Sætre G-P, Moum T, Bures S, Kral M, Adamjan M, Moreno J 1997. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387:589–92
     [Google Scholar]
122. Safran RJ, Vortman Y, Jenkins BR, Hubbard JK, Wilkins MR et al. 2016. The maintenance of phenotypic divergence through sexual selection: an experimental study in barn swallows Hirundo rustica. Evolution 70:2074–84
     [Google Scholar]
123. Searcy WA. 1990. Species recognition of song by female red-winged blackbirds. Anim. Behav. 40:1119–27
     [Google Scholar]
124. Searcy WA, Nowicki S, Hughes M 1997. The response of male and female song sparrows to geographic variation in song. Condor 99:651–57
     [Google Scholar]
125. Secondi J, Bretagnolle V, Compagnon C, Faivre B 2003. Species-specific song convergence in a moving hybrid zone between two passerines. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 80:507–17
     [Google Scholar]
126. Seddon N, Tobias JA 2010. Character displacement from the receiver's perspective: species and mate recognition despite convergent signals in suboscine birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 277:2475–83
     [Google Scholar]
127. Servedio MR, Boughman JW 2017. The role of sexual selection in local adaptation and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48:85–109
     [Google Scholar]
128. Servedio MR, Van Doorn GS, Kopp M, Frame AM, Nosil P 2011. Magic traits in speciation: ‘magic’ but not rare. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26:389–97
     [Google Scholar]
129. Short LL. 1969. Taxonomic aspects of avian hybridization. Auk 86:84–105
     [Google Scholar]
130. Slagsvold T, Hansen BT, Johannessen LE, Lifjeld JT 2002. Mate choice and imprinting in birds studied by cross-fostering in the wild. Proc. R. Soc. B 269:1449–55
     [Google Scholar]
131. Slagsvold T, Wiebe KL 2011. Social learning in birds and its role in shaping a foraging niche. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 366:969–77
     [Google Scholar]
132. Smith BT, McCormack JE, Cuervo AM, Hickerson MJ, Aleixo A et al. 2014. The drivers of tropical speciation. Nature 515:406–9
     [Google Scholar]
133. Smith DG. 1972. The role of the epaulets in the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) social system. Behaviour 41:251–68
     [Google Scholar]
134. Smith JW, Benkman CW 2007. A coevolutionary arms race causes ecological speciation in crossbills. Am. Nat. 169:455–65
     [Google Scholar]
135. Smith JW, Sjoberg SM, Mueller MC, Benkman CW 2012. Assortative flocking in crossbills and implications for ecological speciation. Proc. R. Soc. B 279:4223–29
     [Google Scholar]
136. Snowberg L, Benkman C 2007. The role of marker traits in the assortative mating within red crossbills, Loxia curvirostra complex. J. Evol. Biol. 20:1924–32
     [Google Scholar]
137. Sorenson MD, Hauber ME, Derrickson SR 2010. Sexual imprinting misguides species recognition in a facultative interspecific brood parasite. Proc. R. Soc. B 277:3079–85
     [Google Scholar]
138. Sorenson MD, Sefc KM, Payne RB 2003. Speciation by host switch in brood parasitic indigobirds. Nature 424:928–31
     [Google Scholar]
139. Sosa-Lopez JR, Martinez Gomez JE, Mennill DJ 2016. Divergence in mating signals correlates with genetic distance and behavioural responses to playback. J. Evol. Biol. 29:306–18
     [Google Scholar]
140. Svedin N, Wiley C, Veen T, Gustafsson L, Qvarnström A 2008. Natural and sexual selection against hybrid flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. B 275:735–44
     [Google Scholar]
141. Tietze DT, Wassmann C, Martens J 2012. Territorial song does not isolate Yellowhammers (Emberiza citrinella) from Pine Buntings (E. leucocephalos). Vertebr. Zool. 62:113–22
     [Google Scholar]
142. Tobias JA, Seddon N 2009. Signal design and perception in Hypocnemis antbirds: evidence for convergent evolution via social selection. Evolution 63:3168–89
     [Google Scholar]
143. Toews DPL, Campagna L, Taylor SA, Balakrishnan CN, Baldassarre DT et al. 2016a. Genomic approaches to understanding population divergence and speciation in birds. Auk 133:13–30
     [Google Scholar]
144. Toews DPL, Taylor SA, Vallender R, Brelsford A, Butcher BG et al. 2016b. Plumage genes and little else distinguish the genomes of hybridizing warblers. Curr. Biol. 26:2313–18
     [Google Scholar]
145. Turbek SP, Scordato ES, Safran RJ 2017. The role of seasonal migration in population divergence and reproductive isolation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33:164–75
     [Google Scholar]
146. Tuttle EM, Bergland AO, Korody ML, Brewer MS, Newhouse DJ et al. 2016. Divergence and functional degradation of a sex chromosome-like supergene. Curr. Biol. 26:344–50
     [Google Scholar]
147. Uy JAC, Cooper EA, Cutie S, Concannon MR, Poelstra JW et al. 2016. Mutations in different pigmentation genes are associated with parallel melanism in island flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. B 283:20160731
     [Google Scholar]
148. Uy JAC, Safran RJ 2013. Variation in the temporal and spatial use of signals and its implications for multimodal communication. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67:1499–511
     [Google Scholar]
149. Veen T, Borge T, Griffith SC, Saetre G-P, Bures S et al. 2001. Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers. Nature 411:45
     [Google Scholar]
150. Verzijden MN, Ten Cate C, Servedio MR, Kozak GM, Boughman JW, Svensson EI 2012. The impact of learning on sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27:511–19
     [Google Scholar]
151. von Rönn JA, Shafer A, Wolf JB 2016. Disruptive selection without genome‐wide evolution across a migratory divide. Mol. Ecol. 25:2529–41
     [Google Scholar]
152. Vortman Y, Lotem A, Dor R, Lovette I, Safran RJ 2013. Multiple sexual signals and behavioral reproductive isolation in a diverging population. Am. Nat. 182:514–23
     [Google Scholar]
153. Warren W, Clayton D, Ellegren H, Arnold A, Hillier L et al. 2010. The genome of a songbird. Nature 464:757–62
     [Google Scholar]
154. Warriner CC, Lemmon WB, Ray TS 1963. Early experience as a variable in mate selection. Anim. Behav. 11:221–24
     [Google Scholar]
155. West-Eberhard MJ. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58:155–83
     [Google Scholar]
156. Wheatcroft D, Qvarnström A 2017. Genetic divergence of early song discrimination between two young songbird species. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1:0192
     [Google Scholar]
157. Whitney O, Pfenning AR, Howard JT, Blatti CA, Liu F et al. 2014. Core and region-enriched networks of behaviorally regulated genes and the singing genome. Science 346:1256780
     [Google Scholar]
158. Willett CS. 2011. The nature of interactions that contribute to postzygotic reproductive isolation in hybrid copepods. Genetica 139:575–88
     [Google Scholar]
159. Wilson A, Maxson LR, Sarich V 1974. Two types of molecular evolution. Evidence from studies of interspecific hybridization. PNAS 71:2843–47
     [Google Scholar]
160. Wright AE, Harrison PW, Zimmer F, Montgomery SH, Pointer MA, Mank JE 2015. Variation in promiscuity and sexual selection drives avian rate of Faster‐Z evolution. Mol. Ecol. 24:1218–35
     [Google Scholar]
161. Wu CI. 2001. The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14:851–65
     [Google Scholar]
162. Yasukawa K, Butler LK, Enstrom DA 2009. Intersexual and intrasexual consequences of epaulet colour in male red-winged blackbirds: an experimental approach. Anim. Behav. 77:531–40
     [Google Scholar]