The Ecology and Evolution of Alien Plants

Literature Cited

1. Agrawal AA, Hastings AP, Johnson MTJ, Maron JL, Salminen JP 2012. Insect herbivores drive real-time ecological and evolutionary change in plant populations. Science 338:113–16
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aikio S, Duncan RP, Hulme PE 2010. Lag-phases in alien plant invasions: separating the facts from the artefacts. Oikos 119:370–78
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alpert P, Bone E, Holzapfel C 2000. Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 3:52–66
   [Google Scholar]
4. Atwater DZ, Ervine C, Barney JN 2018. Climatic niche shifts are common in introduced plants. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2:34–43
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baker HG. 1965. Characteristics and modes of origins of weeds. The Genetics of Colonizing Species HG Baker, GL Stebbins 147–72 New York: Academic
   [Google Scholar]
6. Baker HG, Stebbins GL 1965. The Genetics of Colonizing Species New York: Academic
7. Barker BS, Andonian K, Swope SM, Luster DG, Dlugosch KM 2017. Population genomic analyses reveal a history of range expansion and trait evolution across the native and invaded range of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis). Mol. Ecol. 26:1131–47
   [Google Scholar]
8. Binggeli P. 2000. Time-lags between introduction, establishment and rapid spread of introduced environmental weeds Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Third International Weed Science Congress, Foz do Iguassu Brazil: June 6–11
9. Blossey B, Nötzold R 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J. Ecol. 83:887–89
   [Google Scholar]
10. Borer ET, Harpole WS, Adler PB, Lind EM, Orrock JL et al. 2014. Finding generality in ecology: a model for globally distributed experiments. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5:65–73
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D 2005. Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144:1–11
    [Google Scholar]
12. Brown AHD, Marshall DR 1981. Evolutionary changes accompanying colonization in plants. Evolution Today: Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology GCE Scudder, JL Reveal 351–63 Pittsburgh, PA: Hunt Inst., Carnegie-Mellon Univ.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Caley P, Groves RH, Barker R 2008. Estimating the invasion success of introduced plants. Divers. Distrib. 14:196–203
    [Google Scholar]
14. Callaway RM, Ridenour WM 2004. Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2:436–43
    [Google Scholar]
15. Callaway RM, Ridenour WM, Laboski T, Weir T, Vivanco JM 2005. Natural selection for resistance to the allelopathic effects of invasive plants. J. Ecol. 93:576–83
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cappuccino N, Arnason JT 2006. Novel chemistry of invasive exotic plants. Biol. Lett. 2:189–93
    [Google Scholar]
17. Carboni M, Guéguen M, Barros C, Georges D, Boulangeat I et al. 2018. Simulating plant invasion dynamics in mountain ecosystems under global change scenarios. Glob. Change Biol. 24:e289–302
    [Google Scholar]
18. Catford JA, Baumgartner JB, Vesk PA, White M, Buckley YM, McCarthy MA 2016. Disentangling the four demographic dimensions of species invasiveness. J. Ecol. 104:1745–58
    [Google Scholar]
19. Catford JA, Jansson R, Nilsson C 2009. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Divers. Distrib. 15:22–40
    [Google Scholar]
20. CBD (Conv. Biol. Divers.) 2000. Alien species that threaten ecosystems, habitats or species Decision V/8 of the United Nations Environment Programme/Convention of Biological Diversity/Conference of the Parties 5, Secretariat of the CBD Nairobi, Kenya: https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=7150
21. Chesson P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31:343–66
    [Google Scholar]
22. Chun YJ, van Kleunen M, Dawson W 2010. The role of enemy release, tolerance and resistance in plant invasions: linking damage to performance. Ecol. Lett. 13:937–46
    [Google Scholar]
23. Colautti RI, Barrett SCH 2013. Rapid adaptation to climate facilitates range expansion of an invasive plant. Science 342:364–66
    [Google Scholar]
24. Colautti RI, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ 2006. Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol. Invasions 8:1023–37
    [Google Scholar]
25. Colautti RI, Lau JA 2015. Contemporary evolution during invasion: evidence for differentiation, natural selection, and local adaptation. Mol. Ecol. 24:1999–2017
    [Google Scholar]
26. Colautti RI, Maron JL, Barrett SCH 2009. Common garden comparisons of native and introduced plant populations: Latitudinal clines can obscure evolutionary inferences. Evol. Appl. 2:187–99
    [Google Scholar]
27. Cordeiro NJ, Patrick DAG, Munisi B, Gupta V 2004. Role of dispersal in the invasion of an exotic tree in an East African submontane forest. J. Trop. Ecol. 20:449–57
    [Google Scholar]
28. Crooks JA. 2005. Lag times and exotic species: the ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion. Ecoscience 12:316–29
    [Google Scholar]
29. Cummings JA, Parker IM, Gilbert GS 2012. Allelopathy: a tool for weed management in forest restoration. Plant Ecol 213:1975–89
    [Google Scholar]
30. Daehler CC. 2009. Short lag times for invasive tropical plants: evidence from experimental plantings in Hawai'i. PLOS ONE 4:e4462
    [Google Scholar]
31. Darwin C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or, the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life London: Murray
32. Davidson AM, Jennions M, Nicotra AB 2011. Do invasive species show higher phenotypic plasticity than native species and, if so, is it adaptive? A meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 14:419–31
    [Google Scholar]
33. Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol. 88:528–34
    [Google Scholar]
34. Dawson W, Burslem D, Hulme PE 2009. Factors explaining alien plant invasion success in a tropical ecosystem differ at each stage of invasion. J. Ecol. 97:657–65
    [Google Scholar]
35. Dawson W, Fischer M, van Kleunen M 2012a. Common and rare plant species respond differently to fertilisation and competition, whether they are alien or native. Ecol. Lett. 15:873–80
    [Google Scholar]
36. Dawson W, Keser LH, Winter M, Pyšek P, Kartesz J et al. 2013. Correlations between global and regional measures of invasiveness vary with region size. NeoBiota 16:59–80
    [Google Scholar]
37. Dawson W, Moser D, van Kleunen M, Kreft H, Pergl J et al. 2017. Global hotspots and correlates of alien species richness across taxonomic groups. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1:0186
    [Google Scholar]
38. Dawson W, Rohr RP, van Kleunen M, Fischer M 2012b. Alien plant species with a wider global distribution are better able to capitalize on increased resource availability. New Phytol 194:859–67
    [Google Scholar]
39. Dawson W, Schrama M 2016. Identifying the role of soil microbes in plant invasions. J. Ecol. 104:1211–18
    [Google Scholar]
40. Dehnen-Schmutz K, Touza J, Perrings C, Williamson M 2007. A century of the ornamental plant trade and its impact on invasion success. Divers. Distrib. 13:527–34
    [Google Scholar]
41. Dietz H, Edwards PJ 2006. Recognition that causal processes change during plant invasion helps explain conflicts in evidence. Ecology 87:1359–67
    [Google Scholar]
42. Diez JM, Dickie I, Edwards G, Hulme PE, Sullivan JJ, Duncan RP 2010. Negative soil feedbacks accumulate over time for non-native plant species. Ecol. Lett. 13:803–9
    [Google Scholar]
43. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM 2008. Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol. Ecol. 17:431–49
    [Google Scholar]
44. Doorduin LJ, Vrieling K 2011. A review of the phytochemical support for the shifting defence hypothesis. Phytochem. Rev. 10:99–106
    [Google Scholar]
45. Elton CS. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants London: Methuen
46. Essl F, Dullinger S, Rabitsch W, Hulme PE, Hulber K et al. 2011. Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. PNAS 108:203–7
    [Google Scholar]
47. Felker-Quinn E, Schweitzer JA, Bailey JK 2013. Meta-analysis reveals evolution in invasive plant species but little support for Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (EICA). Ecol. Evol. 3:739–51
    [Google Scholar]
48. Feng YH, Maurel N, Wang ZH, Ning L, Yu FH, van Kleunen M 2016. Introduction history, climatic suitability, native range size, species traits and their interactions explain establishment of Chinese woody species in Europe. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25:1356–66
    [Google Scholar]
49. Funk JL. 2013. The physiology of invasive plants in low-resource environments. Conserv. Physiol. 1:cot026
    [Google Scholar]
50. Gallien L, Carboni M 2016. The community ecology of invasive species: Where are we and what's next. Ecography 40:335–52
    [Google Scholar]
51. Gao LX, Geng YP, Li B, Chen JK, Yang J 2010. Genome-wide DNA methylation alterations of Alternanthera philoxeroides in natural and manipulated habitats: implications for epigenetic regulation of rapid responses to environmental fluctuation and phenotypic variation. Plant Cell Environ 33:1820–27
    [Google Scholar]
52. Good RDO. 1931. A theory of plant geography. New Phytol 30:149–71
    [Google Scholar]
53. Gould BA, Stinchcombe JR 2017. Population genomic scans suggest novel genes underlie convergent flowering time evolution in the introduced range of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Ecol 26:92–106
    [Google Scholar]
54. Guisan A, Petitpierre B, Broennimann O, Daehler C, Kueffer C 2014. Unifying niche shift studies: insights from biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29:260–69
    [Google Scholar]
55. Gurevitch J, Fox GA, Wardle GM, Inderjit, Taub D 2011. Emergent insights from the synthesis of conceptual frameworks for biological invasions. Ecol. Lett. 14:407–18
    [Google Scholar]
56. Harvey JA, Bukovinszky T, van der Putten WH 2010. Interactions between invasive plants and insect herbivores: a plea for a multitrophic perspective. Biol. Conserv. 143:2251–59
    [Google Scholar]
57. Hayward J, Horton TR, Pauchard A, Nuñez MA 2015. A single ectomycorrhizal fungal species can enable a Pinus invasion. Ecology 96:1438–44
    [Google Scholar]
58. Hobbs RJ, Huenneke LF 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion - implications for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 6:324–37
    [Google Scholar]
59. Hovick SM, Whitney KD 2014. Hybridisation is associated with increased fecundity and size in invasive taxa: meta-analytic support for the hybridisation-invasion hypothesis. Ecol. Lett. 17:1464–77
    [Google Scholar]
60. Hufbauer R, Torchin M 2007. Integrating ecological and evolutionary theory of biological invasions. Biological Invasions W Nentwig 79–96 Berlin: Springer-Verlag
    [Google Scholar]
61. Hyndman RJ, Mesgaran MB, Cousens RD 2015. Statistical issues with using herbarium data for the estimation of invasion lag-phases. Biol. Invasions 17:3371–81
    [Google Scholar]
62. Joshi J, Vrieling K 2005. The enemy release and EICA hypothesis revisited: incorporating the fundamental difference between specialist and generalist herbivores. Ecol. Lett. 8:704–14
    [Google Scholar]
63. Keane RM, Crawley MJ 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:164–70
    [Google Scholar]
64. Keller SR, Taylor DR 2008. History, chance and adaptation during biological invasion: separating stochastic phenotypic evolution from response to selection. Ecol. Lett. 11:852–66
    [Google Scholar]
65. Keller SR, Taylor DR 2010. Genomic admixture increases fitness during a biological invasion. J. Evol. Biol. 23:1720–31
    [Google Scholar]
66. Kempel A, Chrobock T, Fischer M, Rohr RP, van Kleunen M 2013. Determinants of plant establishment success in a multispecies introduction experiment with native and alien species. PNAS 110:12727–32
    [Google Scholar]
67. Kowarik I. 1995. Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. Plant Invasions: General Aspects and Special Problems P Pyšek, K Prach, M Rejmánek, M Wade 15–38 Amsterdam: SPB Academic
    [Google Scholar]
68. Lankau RA. 2012. Coevolution between invasive and native plants driven by chemical competition and soil biota. PNAS 109:11240–45
    [Google Scholar]
69. Lankau RA, Nuzzo V, Spyreas G, Davis AS 2009. Evolutionary limits ameliorate the negative impact of an invasive plant. PNAS 106:15362–67
    [Google Scholar]
70. Larkin DJ. 2012. Lengths and correlates of lag phases in upper-Midwest plant invasions. Biol. Invasions 14:827–38
    [Google Scholar]
71. Lau JA. 2006. Evolutionary responses of native plants to novel community members. Evolution 60:56–63
    [Google Scholar]
72. Lau JA. 2008. Beyond the ecological: Biological invasions alter natural selection on a native plant species. Ecology 89:1023–31
    [Google Scholar]
73. Le Roux JJ, Hui C, Keet JH, Ellis AG 2017. Co-introduction versus ecological fitting as pathways to the establishment of effective mutualisms during biological invasions. New Phytol 215:1354–60
    [Google Scholar]
74. Levine JM, Adler PB, Yelenik SG 2004. A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 7:975–89
    [Google Scholar]
75. Liao ZY, Zheng YL, Lei YB, Feng YL 2014. Evolutionary increases in defense during a biological invasion. Oecologia 174:1205–14
    [Google Scholar]
76. Lind EM, Parker JD 2010. Novel weapons testing: Are invasive plants more chemically defended than native plants. PLOS ONE 5:e10429
    [Google Scholar]
77. Liu Y, van Kleunen M 2017. Responses of common and rare aliens and natives to nutrient availability and fluctuations. J. Ecol. 105:1111–22
    [Google Scholar]
78. Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:223–28
    [Google Scholar]
79. Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP 2007. Invasion Ecology Malden, MA: Blackwell
80. MacDougall AS, Gilbert B, Levine JM 2009. Plant invasions and the niche. J. Ecol. 97:609–15
    [Google Scholar]
81. Macel M, de Vos RCH, Jansen JJ, van der Putten WH, van Dam NM 2014. Novel chemistry of invasive plants: Exotic species have more unique metabolomic profiles than native congeners. Ecol. Evol. 4:2777–86
    [Google Scholar]
82. Mangla S, Inderjit, Callaway RM 2008. Exotic invasive plant accumulates native soil pathogens which inhibit native plants. J. Ecol. 96:58–67
    [Google Scholar]
83. Maron JL, Klironomos J, Waller L, Callaway RM 2014. Invasive plants escape from suppressive soil biota at regional scales. J. Ecol. 102:19–27
    [Google Scholar]
84. Maron JL, Vila M, Bommarco R, Elmendorf S, Beardsley P 2004. Rapid evolution of an invasive plant. Ecol. Monogr. 74:261–80
    [Google Scholar]
85. Maurel N, Hanspach J, Kühn I, Pyšek P, van Kleunen M 2016. Introduction bias affects relationships between the characteristics of ornamental alien plants and their naturalization success. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25:1500–9
    [Google Scholar]
86. Mayer K, Haeuser E, Dawson W, Essl F, Kreft H et al. 2017. Naturalization of ornamental plant species in public green spaces and private gardens. Biol. Invasions 19:3613–27
    [Google Scholar]
87. Mayfield MM, Levine JM 2010. Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. Ecol. Lett. 13:1085–93
    [Google Scholar]
88. McKinney CL. 2001. Effects of human population, area, and time on non-native plant and fish diversity in the United States. Biol. Conserv. 100:243–52
    [Google Scholar]
89. Meijer K, Schilthuizen M, Beukeboom L, Smit C 2016. A review and meta-analysis of the enemy release hypothesis in plant-herbivorous insect systems. PeerJ 4:e2560v1
    [Google Scholar]
90. Menzel A, Hempel S, Klotz S, Moora M, Pyšek P et al. 2017. Mycorrhizal status helps explain invasion success of alien plant species. Ecology 98:92–102
    [Google Scholar]
91. Mitchell CE, Power AG 2003. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421:625–27
    [Google Scholar]
92. Müller-Schärer H, Schaffner U, Steinger T 2004. Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:417–22
    [Google Scholar]
93. Oduor AMO. 2013. Evolutionary responses of native plant species to invasive plants: a review. New Phytol 200:986–92
    [Google Scholar]
94. Oduor AMO, Leimu R, van Kleunen M 2016. Invasive plant species are locally adapted just as frequently and at least as strongly as native plant species. J. Ecol. 104:957–68
    [Google Scholar]
95. Ollerton J, Watts S, Connerty S, Lock J, Parker L et al. 2012. Pollination ecology of the invasive tree tobacco Nicotiana glauca: comparisons across native and non-native ranges. J. Pollinat. Ecol. 9:85–95
    [Google Scholar]
96. Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S 2011. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals. Oikos 120:321–26
    [Google Scholar]
97. Orians CM, Ward D 2010. Evolution of plant defenses in nonindigenous environments. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55:439–59
    [Google Scholar]
98. Pandit MK, White SM, Pocock MJO 2014. The contrasting effects of genome size, chromosome number and ploidy level on plant invasiveness: a global analysis. New Phytol 203:697–703
    [Google Scholar]
99. Panetta FD, Mitchell ND 1991. Homoclime analysis and the prediction of weediness. Weed Res 31:273–84
    [Google Scholar]
100. Parepa M, Fischer M, Bossdorf O 2013. Environmental variability promotes plant invasion. Nat. Commun. 4:1604
     [Google Scholar]
101. Parepa M, Fischer M, Krebs C, Bossdorf O 2014. Hybridization increases invasive knotweed success. Evol. Appl. 7:413–20
     [Google Scholar]
102. Parker JD, Torchin ME, Hufbauer RA, Lemoine NP, Alba C et al. 2013. Do invasive species perform better in their new ranges. Ecology 94:985–94
     [Google Scholar]
103. Prior KM, Saxena K, Frederickson ME 2014. Seed handling behaviours of native and invasive seed-dispersing ants differentially influence seedling emergence in an introduced plant. Ecol. Entomol. 39:66–74
     [Google Scholar]
104. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Chytrý M, Danihelka J, Kühn I et al. 2011. Successful invaders co-opt pollinators of native flora and accumulate insect pollinators with increasing residence time. Ecol. Monogr. 81:277–93
     [Google Scholar]
105. Pyšek P, Pergl J, Essl F, Lenzner B, Dawson W et al. 2017. Naturalized alien flora of the world: species diversity, taxonomic and phylogenetic patterns, geographic distribution and global hotspots of plant invasion. Preslia 89:203–74
     [Google Scholar]
106. Pyšek P, Richardson DM 2007. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: Where do we stand. Biological Invasions W Nentwig 97–125 Berlin: Springer-Verlag
     [Google Scholar]
107. Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Rejmánek M, Webster GL, Williamson M, Kirschner J 2004. Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon 53:131–43
     [Google Scholar]
108. Rabinowitz D. 1981. Seven forms of rarity. The Biological Aspects of Rare Plant Conservation H Synge 205–17 Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons
     [Google Scholar]
109. Razanajatovo M, Maurel N, Dawson W, Essl F, Kreft H et al. 2016. Plants capable of selfing are more likely to become naturalized. Nat. Commun. 7:13313
     [Google Scholar]
110. Razanajatovo M, van Kleunen M 2016. Non-invasive naturalized alien plants were not more pollen-limited than invasive aliens and natives in a common garden. Funct. Ecol. 30:1511–20
     [Google Scholar]
111. Reinhart KO, Tytgat T, van der Putten WH, Clay K 2010. Virulence of soil-borne pathogens and invasion by Prunus serotina. New Phytol 186:484–95
     [Google Scholar]
112. Rejmánek M. 1996. A theory of seed plant invasiveness: the first sketch. Biol. Conserv. 78:171–81
     [Google Scholar]
113. Rejmánek M. 2000. Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Austral Ecol 25:497–506
     [Google Scholar]
114. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM 2013. Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species—2013 update of the global database. Divers. Distrib. 19:1093–94
     [Google Scholar]
115. Richards CL, Alonso C, Becker C, Bossdorf O, Bucher E et al. 2017. Ecological plant epigenetics: evidence from model and non-model species, and the way forward. Ecol. Lett. 20:1576–90
     [Google Scholar]
116. Richardson DM, Pyšek P 2006. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Prog. Phys. Geog. 30:409–31
     [Google Scholar]
117. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib. 6:93–107
     [Google Scholar]
118. Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Brown JH, Bruno JF, Dawson MN et al. 2007. Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22:465–71
     [Google Scholar]
119. Seabloom EW, Borer ET, Buckley YM, Cleland EE, Davies KF et al. 2015. Plant species’ origin predicts dominance and response to nutrient enrichment and herbivores in global grasslands. Nat. Commun. 6:7710
     [Google Scholar]
120. Seabloom EW, Williams JW, Slayback D, Stoms DM, Viers JH, Dobson AP 2006. Human impacts, plant invasion, and imperiled, plant species in California. Ecol. Appl. 16:1338–50
     [Google Scholar]
121. Seebens H, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE, Genovesi P, Hulme PE et al. 2017. No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nat. Commun. 8:14435
     [Google Scholar]
122. Seebens H, Essl F, Dawson W, Fuentes N, Moser D et al. 2015. Global trade will accelerate plant invasions in emerging economies under climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 21:4128–40
     [Google Scholar]
123. Shea K, Possingham HP 2000. Optimal release strategies for biological control agents: an application of stochastic dynamic programming to population management. J. Appl. Ecol. 37:77–86
     [Google Scholar]
124. Shelby N, Duncan RP, van der Putten WH, McGinn KJ, Weser C, Hulme PE 2016. Plant mutualisms with rhizosphere microbiota in introduced versus native ranges. J. Ecol. 104:1259–70
     [Google Scholar]
125. Shipley B. 2000. Cause and Correlation in Biology. A User's Guide to Path Analysis, Structural Equations and Causal Inference Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
126. Simberloff D. 2009. The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40:81–102
     [Google Scholar]
127. Sinclair JS, Arnott SE 2016. Strength in size not numbers: propagule size more important than number in sexually reproducing populations. Biol. Invasions 18:497–505
     [Google Scholar]
128. Stinson KA, Campbell SA, Powell JR, Wolfe BE, Callaway RM et al. 2006. Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlings by disrupting belowground mutualisms. PLOS Biol 4:727–31
     [Google Scholar]
129. Stohlgren TJ, Barnett DT, Kartesz JT 2003. The rich get richer: patterns of plant invasions in the United States. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1:11–14
     [Google Scholar]
130. Stout JC, Parnell JAN, Arroyo J, Crowe TP 2006. Pollination ecology and seed production of Rhododendron ponticum in native and exotic habitats. Biodivers. Conserv. 15:755–77
     [Google Scholar]
131. Stout JC, Tiedeken EJ 2017. Direct interactions between invasive plants and native pollinators: evidence, impacts and approaches. Funct. Ecol. 31:38–46
     [Google Scholar]
132. Strauss SY, Lau JA, Carroll SP 2006. Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: What do introductions tell us about natural communities. Ecol. Lett. 9:354–71
     [Google Scholar]
133. Strauss SY, Zangerl AR 2002. Plant-insect interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Plant Animal Interactions: An Evolutionary Approach CM Herrera, O Pellmyr 77–106 Oxford, UK: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
134. Suchan T, Pitteloud C, Gerasimova NS, Kostikova A, Schmid S et al. 2016. Hybridization capture using RAD probes (hyRAD), a new tool for performing genomic analyses on collection specimens. PLOS ONE 11:e0151651
     [Google Scholar]
135. Thorpe AS, Thelen GC, Diaconu A, Callaway RM 2009. Root exudate is allelopathic in invaded community but not in native community: field evidence for the novel weapons hypothesis. J. Ecol. 97:641–45
     [Google Scholar]
136. Thuiller W, Gallien L, Boulangeat I, de Bello F, Munkemuller T et al. 2010. Resolving Darwin's naturalization conundrum: a quest for evidence. Divers. Distrib. 16:461–75
     [Google Scholar]
137. Traveset A, Richardson DM 2014. Mutualistic interactions and biological invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45:89–113
     [Google Scholar]
138. van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Bossdorf O, Fischer M 2014. The more the merrier: multi-species experiments in ecology. Basic Appl. Ecol. 15:1–9
     [Google Scholar]
139. van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Essl F, Pergl J, Winter M et al. 2015a. Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature 525:100–3
     [Google Scholar]
140. van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Maurel N 2015b. Characteristics of successful alien plants. Mol. Ecol. 24:1954–68
     [Google Scholar]
141. van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Schlaepfer D, Jeschke JM, Fischer M 2010a. Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecol. Lett. 13:947–58
     [Google Scholar]
142. van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M 2010b. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol. Lett. 13:235–45
     [Google Scholar]
143. Vandepitte K, De Meyer T, Helsen K, Van Acker K, Roldan-Ruiz I et al. 2014. Rapid genetic adaptation precedes the spread of an exotic plant species. Mol. Ecol. 23:2157–64
     [Google Scholar]
144. Vilà M, Bartomeus I, Dietzsch AC, Petanidou T, Steffan-Dewenter I et al. 2009. Invasive plant integration into native plant–pollinator networks across Europe. Proc. R. Soc. B 276:3887–93
     [Google Scholar]
145. Vitousek PM, Walker LR 1989. Biological invasion by Myrica faya in Hawai'i: plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem effects. Ecol. Monogr. 59:247–65
     [Google Scholar]
146. Von Holle B, Simberloff D 2005. Ecological resistance to biological invasion overwhelmed by propagule pressure. Ecology 86:3212–18
     [Google Scholar]
147. Wang B, Qiu YL 2006. Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants. Mycorrhiza 16:299–363
     [Google Scholar]
148. Wang XY, Shen DW, Jiao J, Xu NN, Yu S et al. 2012. Genotypic diversity enhances invasive ability of Spartina alterniflora. Mol. Ecol 21:2542–51
     [Google Scholar]
149. White PS, Pickett ST 1985. Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: an introduction. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics ST Pickett, PS White London: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
150. Whitney KD, Broman KW, Kane NC, Hovick SM, Randell RA, Rieseberg LH 2015. Quantitative trait locus mapping identifies candidate alleles involved in adaptive introgression and range expansion in a wild sunflower. Mol. Ecol. 24:2194–211
     [Google Scholar]
151. Williams JL, Auge H, Maron JL 2008. Different gardens, different results: native and introduced populations exhibit contrasting phenotypes across common gardens. Oecologia 157:239–48
     [Google Scholar]
152. Zhang YY, Parepa M, Fischer M, Bossdorf O 2017. Epigenetics of colonizing species? A study of Japanese knotweed in Central Europe. Invasion Genetics: The Baker and Stebbins Legacy SCH Barrett, RI Colautti, KM Dlugosch, LH Rieseberg 328–40 Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons
     [Google Scholar]
153. Zhang Z, Pan X, Blumenthal D, van Kleunen M, Liu M, Li B 2018. Contrasting effects of specialist and generalist herbivores on resistance evolution in invasive plants. Ecology 99:866–75
     [Google Scholar]