Integrating Networks, Phylogenomics, and Population Genomics for the Study of Polyploidy

Literature Cited

1. Almal SH, Padh H 2012. Implications of gene copy-number variation in health and diseases. J. Hum. Genet. 57:16–13
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arabidopsis Interactome Mapp. Consort 2011. Evidence for network evolution in an Arabidopsis interactome map. Science 333:601–7
   [Google Scholar]
3. Avise JC, Robinson TJ 2008. Hemiplasy: a new term in the lexicon of phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 57:503–7
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baldrich P, Beric A, Meyers BC 2018. Despacito: the slow evolutionary changes in plant microRNA. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 42:16–22
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barker MS, Husband BC, Pires JC 2016. Spreading Winge and flying high: the evolutionary importance of polyploidy after a century of study. Am. J. Bot. 103:71139–45
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bastide P, Solís-Lemus C, Kriebel R, Sparks KW, Ané C 2018. Phylogenetic comparative methods on phylogenetic networks with reticulations. Syst. Biol. 67:800–20
   [Google Scholar]
7. Beissinger TM, Wang L, Crosby K, Durvasula A, Hufford MB, Ross-Ibarra J 2016. Recent demography drives changes in linked selection across the maize genome. Nat. Plants 2:16084
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bekaert M, Edger PP, Pires JC, Conant GC 2011. Two-phase resolution of polyploidy in the Arabidopsis metabolic network gives rise to relative followed by absolute dosage constraints. Plant Cell 23:51719–28
   [Google Scholar]
9. Birchler JA, Johnson AF, Veitia RA 2016. Kinetics genetics: incorporating the concept of genomic balance into an understanding of quantitative traits. Plant Sci 245:128–34
   [Google Scholar]
10. Birchler JA, Riddle NC, Auger DL, Veitia RA 2005. Dosage balance in gene regulation: biological implications. Trends Genet 21:219–26
    [Google Scholar]
11. Birchler JA, Veitia RA 2007. The gene balance hypothesis: from classical genetics to modern genomics. Plant Cell 19:2395–402
    [Google Scholar]
12. Birchler JA, Veitia RA 2012. Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. PNAS 109:3714746–53
    [Google Scholar]
13. Blischak PD, Kubatko LS, Wolfe AD 2016. Accounting for genotype uncertainty in the estimation of allele frequencies in autopolyploids. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 16:3742–54
    [Google Scholar]
14. Blischak PD, Kubatko LS, Wolfe AD 2018. SNP genotyping and parameter estimation in polyploids using low-coverage sequence data. Bioinformatics 34:407–15
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bowman JL, Kohchi T, Yamamoto KT, Jenkins J, Shu S et al. 2017. Insights into land plant evolution garnered from the Marchantia polymorpha genome. Cell 171:2287–304
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bradburd GS, Ralph PL, Coop GM 2016. A spatial framework for understanding population structure and admixture. PLOS Genet 12:1e1005703
    [Google Scholar]
17. Campbell MA, Ganley AR, Gabaldón T, Cox MP 2016. The case of the missing ancient fungal polyploids. Am. Nat. 188:6602–14
    [Google Scholar]
18. Chae L, Lee I, Shin J, Rhee SY 2012. Towards understanding how molecular networks evolve in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15:177–184
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cheng F, Sun C, Wu J, Schnable J, Woodhouse MR et al. 2016. Epigenetic regulation of subgenome dominance following a whole genome triplication in Brassica rapa. New Phytol 211:1288–99
    [Google Scholar]
20. Cheng F, Wu J, Cai X, Liang J, Freeling M, Wang X 2018. Gene retention, fractionation and subgenome differences in polyploid plants. Nat. Plants 4:258–68
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cheng F, Wu J, Fang L, Sun S, Liu B et al. 2012. Biased gene fractionation and dominant gene expression among the subgenomes of Brassica rapa. PLOS ONE 7:5e36442
    [Google Scholar]
22. Cheng JY, Mailund T, Nielsen R 2017. Fast admixture analysis and population tree estimation for SNP and NGS data. Bioinformatics 33:142148–55
    [Google Scholar]
23. Chifman J, Kubatko LS 2014. Quartet inference from SNP data under the coalescent model. Bioinformatics 30:233317–24
    [Google Scholar]
24. Coate JE, Song MJ, Bombarely A, Doyle JJ 2016. Expression-level support for gene dosage sensitivity in three Glycine subgenus Glycine polyploids and their diploid progenitors. New Phytol 212:31083–93
    [Google Scholar]
25. Conant GC. 2014. Comparative genomics as a time machine: How relative gene dosage and metabolic requirements shaped the time-dependent resolution of yeast polyploidy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31:123184–93
    [Google Scholar]
26. Conant GC, Birchler JA, Pires JC 2014. Dosage, duplication, and diploidization: clarifying the interplay of multiple models for duplicate gene evolution over time. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 19:91–98
    [Google Scholar]
27. Conant GC, Wolfe KH 2006. Functional partitioning of yeast co-expression networks after genome duplication. PLOS Genet 4:e109
    [Google Scholar]
28. Conant GC, Wolfe KH 2007. Increased glycolytic flux as an outcome of whole-genome duplication in yeast. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3:129
    [Google Scholar]
29. Conant GC, Wolfe KH 2008a. Probabilistic cross-species inference of orthologous genomic regions created by whole-genome duplication in yeast. Genetics 179:31681–92
    [Google Scholar]
30. Conant GC, Wolfe KH 2008b. Turning a hobby into a job: How duplicated genes find new functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9:12938–50
    [Google Scholar]
31. Cornille A, Salcedo A, Kryvokhyzha D, Glémin S, Holm K et al. 2016. Genomic signature of successful colonization of Eurasia by the allopolyploid shepherd's purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris). Mol. Ecol. 25:2616–29
    [Google Scholar]
32. de Quieroz K 2007. Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst. Biol. 56:879–86
    [Google Scholar]
33. De Smet R, Sabaghian E, Li Z, Saeys Y, Van de Peer Y 2017. Coordinated functional divergence of genes after genome duplication in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 29:112786–800
    [Google Scholar]
34. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA 2009. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference, and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:332–40
    [Google Scholar]
35. Ding M, Chen ZJ 2018. Epigenetic perspective on the evolution and domestication of polyploid plants and crops. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 42:37–48
    [Google Scholar]
36. Dodsworth S, Chase MW, Leitch AR 2015. Is post-polyploidization diploidization the key to the evolutionary success of angiosperms. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 180:11–5
    [Google Scholar]
37. Dubin MJ, Scheid OM, Becker C 2018. Transposons: a blessing curse. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 42:23–29
    [Google Scholar]
38. Dufresne F, Stift M, Vergilino R, Mable BK 2014. Recent progress and challenges in population genetics of polyploid organisms: an overview of current state-of-the-art molecular and statistical tools. Mol. Ecol. 23:40–69
    [Google Scholar]
39. Dunn CW, Zapata F, Munro C, Siebert S, Hejnol A 2018. Pairwise comparisons across species are problematic when analyzing functional genomic data. PNAS 115:E409–17
    [Google Scholar]
40. Edger PP, Heidel-Fischer HM, Bekaert M, Rota J, Glöckner G et al. 2015. The butterfly plant arms-race escalated by gene and genome duplications. PNAS 112:278362–66
    [Google Scholar]
41. Edger PP, McKain MR, Bird KA, VanBuren R 2018. Subgenome assignment in allopolyploids: challenges and future directions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 42:76–80
    [Google Scholar]
42. Edger PP, Smith R, McKain MR, Cooley AM, Vallejo-Marin M et al. 2017. Subgenome dominance in an interspecific hybrid, synthetic allopolyploid, and a 140-year-old naturally established neo-allopolyploid monkey flower. Plant Cell 29:92150–67 Subgenome dominance of gene expression levels occurs immediately after hybridization between divergent species in monkey flowers.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Emery M, Willis MMS, Hao Y, Barry K, Oakgrove K et al. 2018. Preferential retention of genes from one parental genome after polyploidy illustrates the nature and scope of the genomic conflicts induced by hybridization. PLOS Genet 14:e1007267Using the phylogenomic framework in the software POInT, the authors recover a signal of biased fractionation in Arabidopsis, grasses, and yeast.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Excoffier L, Dupanloup I, Huerta-Sánchez E, Susa VC, Foll M 2013. Robust demographic inference from genomic and SNP data. PLOS Genet 9:10e1003905
    [Google Scholar]
45. Freeling M. 2009. Bias in plant gene content following different sorts of duplication: tandem, whole-genome, segmental, or by transposition. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 60:433–53
    [Google Scholar]
46. Freeling M, Scanlon MJ, Fowler JE 2015. Fractionation and subfunctionalization following genome duplications: mechanisms that drive gene content and their consequences. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 35:110–18This article discusses the importance of distinguishing between fractionation and subfunctionalization in polyploid genome evolution.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Freeling M, Thomas BC 2006. Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity. Genome Res 16:7805–14
    [Google Scholar]
48. Gaeta RT, Pires JC 2010. Homoeologous recombination in allopolyploids: the polyploid ratchet. New Phytol 186:118–28
    [Google Scholar]
49. Gallagher JP, Grover CE, Hu G, Wendel JF 2016. Insights into the ecology and evolution of polyploid plants through network analysis. Mol. Ecol. 25:112644–60
    [Google Scholar]
50. Gardiner L-J, Joynson R, Omony J, Rusholme-Pilcher R, Olohan L et al. 2017. Hidden variation in polyploid wheat drives local adaptation. bioRxiv 217828. https://doi.org/10.1101/217828
    [Crossref]
51. Gerstein AC, Lim H, Berman J, Hickman MA 2017. Ploidy tug-of-war: Evolutionary and genetic environments influence the rate of ploidy drive in a human fungal pathogen. Evolution 71:41025–38
    [Google Scholar]
52. Golicz AA, Bayer PE, Barker GC, Edger PP, Kim HR et al. 2016. The pangenome of an agronomically important crop plant Brassica oleracea. Nat. Commun 7:13390
    [Google Scholar]
53. Gordon SP, Contreras-Moreira B, Woods DP, Des Marais DL, Burgess D et al. 2017. Extensive gene content variation in the Brachypodium distachyon pan-genome correlates with population structure. Nat. Commun. 8:12184Gene content variation in Brachypodium is associated with different functions, evolutionary rates, and genomic positions.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Gutenkunst RN, Hernandez RD, Williamson SH, Bustamante CD 2009. Inferring the joint demographic history of multiple populations from multidimensional SNP frequency data. PLOS Genet 5:10e1000695
    [Google Scholar]
55. Hahn MW, Nakhleh L 2016. Irrational exuberance for resolved species trees. Evolution 70:7–17
    [Google Scholar]
56. He Z, Wang L, Harper AL, Havlickova L, Pradhan AK et al. 2017. Extensive homoeologous genome exchanges in allopolyploid crops revealed by mRNAseq-based visualization. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15:5594–604
    [Google Scholar]
57. Hejase HA, Vande Pol N, Bonito GM, Edger PP, Liu KJ 2017. Coal-Miner: a statistical method for GWA studies of quantitative traits with complex evolutionary origins. ACM-BCB 2017—Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics107–14 New York: Assoc. Comput. Mach.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Hermansen RA, Hvidsten TR, Sandve SR, Liberles DA 2016. Extracting functional trends from whole genome duplication events using comparative genomics. Biol. Proceed. Online 18:11
    [Google Scholar]
59. Holland PWH. 1999. Gene duplication: past, present and future. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:541–47
    [Google Scholar]
60. Hollister JD, Gaut BS 2009. Epigenetic silencing of transposable elements: a trade-off between reduced transposition and deleterious effects on neighboring gene expression. Genome Res 19:1419–28
    [Google Scholar]
61. Homouz D, Kudlicki AS 2013. The 3D organization of the yeast genome correlates with co-expression and reflects functional relations between genes. PLOS ONE 8:e54699
    [Google Scholar]
62. Horvath R, Slotte T 2017. The role of small RNA-based epigenetic silencing for purifying selection on transposable elements in Capsella grandiflora. Genome Biol. Evol 9:102911–20
    [Google Scholar]
63. Hughes TE, Langdale JA, Kelly S 2014. The impact of widespread regulatory neofunctionalization on homeolog gene evolution following whole-genome duplication in maize. Genome Res 24:81348–55
    [Google Scholar]
64. Hurgobin B, Golicz AA, Bayer PE, Chan CK, Tirnaz S et al. 2017. Homoeologous exchange is a major cause of gene presence/absence variation in the amphidiploid Brassica napus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 16:1265–74
    [Google Scholar]
65. Jiao W, Yuan J, Jiang S, Liu Y, Wang L et al. 2018. Asymmetrical changes of gene expression, small RNAs and chromatin in two resynthesized wheat allotetraploids. Plant J 93:5828–42
    [Google Scholar]
66. Jighly A, Lin Z, Forster JW, Spangenberg GC, Hayes BJ, Daetwyler HD 2018. Insights into population genetics and evolution of polyploids and their ancestors. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 18:1157–72
    [Google Scholar]
67. Jones GR. 2017. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis for diploid and allotetraploid species networks. bioRxiv 129361. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/04/21/129361
68. Kamneva OK, Rosenberg NA 2017. Simulation-based evaluation of hybridization network reconstruction methods in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting. Evol. Bioinform. Online 13:1176934317691935
    [Google Scholar]
69. Kamneva OK, Syring J, Liston A, Rosenberg NA 2017. Evaluating allopolyploid origins in strawberries (Fragaria) using haplotypes generated from target capture sequencing. BMC Evol. Biol. 17:1180Using the program PhyloNet, the authors infer complex phylogenetic relationships in allopolyploid strawberries.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Khaitovich P, Paabo S, Weiss G 2005. Toward a neutral evolutionary model of gene expression. Genetics 170:2929–39
    [Google Scholar]
71. Khaitovich P, Weiss G, Lachmann M, Hellmann I, Enard W et al. 2004. A neutral model of transcriptome evolution. PLOS Biol 2:5e132
    [Google Scholar]
72. Kingman JCF. 1982. On the genealogy of large populations. J. Appl. Stat. 19:27–43
    [Google Scholar]
73. Kondrashov FA, Kondrashov AS 2006. Role of selection in fixation of gene duplications. J. Theor. Biol. 239:2141–51
    [Google Scholar]
74. Kryvokhyzha D, Holm K, Chen J, Cornille A, Glémin S et al. 2016. The influence of population structure on gene expression and flowering time variation in the ubiquitous weed Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae). Mol. Ecol. 25:51106–21
    [Google Scholar]
75. Kuang MC, Hutchins PD, Russell JD, Coon JJ, Hittinger CT 2016. Ongoing resolution of duplicate gene functions shapes the diversification of a metabolic network. eLife 5:e19027
    [Google Scholar]
76. Landis JB, Soltis DE, Li Z, Marx HE, Barker MS et al. 2018. Impact of whole-genome duplication events on diversification rates in angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 105:348–63
    [Google Scholar]
77. Lashermes P, Hueber Y, Combes MC, Severac D, Dereeper A 2016. Inter-genomic DNA exchanges and homeologous gene silencing shaped the nascent allopolyploid coffee genome (Coffea arabica L.). G3 6:92937–48
    [Google Scholar]
78. Lee KM, Coop G 2017. Distinguishing among modes of convergent adaptation using population genomic data. Genetics 207:41591–619
    [Google Scholar]
79. Li W-H. 1980. Rate of gene silencing at duplicate loci: a theoretical study and interpretation of data from tetraploid fish. Genetics 95:237–58
    [Google Scholar]
80. Li Z, Defoort J, Tasdighian S, Maere S, Van de Peer Y, De Smet R 2016. Gene duplicability of core genes is highly consistent across all angiosperms. Plant Cell 28:2326–44
    [Google Scholar]
81. Li Z, Tiley GP, Galuska SR, Reardon CR, Kidder TI, 2018. Multiple large-scale gene and genome duplications during the evolution of hexapods. PNAS 115:184713–18
    [Google Scholar]
82. Lien S, Koop BF, Sandve SR, Miller JR, Kent MP et al. 2016. The Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization. Nature 533:7602200–5
    [Google Scholar]
83. Limborg MT, Larson WA, Seeb LW, Seeb JE 2017. Screening of duplicated loci reveals hidden divergence patterns in a complex salmonid genome. Mol. Ecol. 26:174509–22
    [Google Scholar]
84. Lopez-Nieves S, Yang Y, Timoneda A, Wang M, Feng T et al. 2018. Relaxation of tyrosine pathway regulation underlies the evolution of betalain pigmentation in Caryophyllales. New Phytol 217:2896–908Orthologs of a tyrosine-insensitive pigmentation locus associate with the evolution and loss of betalain production.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Lynch M, Marinov GK 2015. The bioenergetic costs of a gene. PNAS 112:5115690–95
    [Google Scholar]
86. Mable BK. 2001. Ploidy evolution in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a test of the nutrient limitation hypothesis. J. Evol. Biol. 14:157–70
    [Google Scholar]
87. Maere S, De Bodt S, Raes J, Casneuf T, Van Montagu M et al. 2005. Modeling gene and genome duplications in eukaryotes. PNAS 102:155454–59
    [Google Scholar]
88. Makino T, McLysaght A 2010. Ohnologs in the human genome are dosage balanced and frequently associated with disease. PNAS 18:9270–74
    [Google Scholar]
89. Mandáková T, Lysak MA 2018. Post-polyploid diploidization and diversification through dysploid changes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 42:55–65
    [Google Scholar]
90. Marad DA, Burskirk SW, Lang GI 2018. Altered access to beneficial mutations slows adaptation and biases fixed mutations in diploids. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2:882–89
    [Google Scholar]
91. Marcet-Houben M, Gabaldón T 2015. Beyond the whole-genome duplication: phylogenetic evidence for an ancient interspecies hybridization in the baker's yeast lineage. PLOS Biol 13:e1002220
    [Google Scholar]
92. Mayfield-Jones D, Washburn JD, Arias T, Edger PP, Pires JC, Conant GC 2013. Watching the grin fade: tracing the effects of polyploidy on different evolutionary time scales. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 24:4320–31
    [Google Scholar]
93. Meirmans PG, Liu S, van Tienderen PH 2018. The analysis of polyploid genetic data. J. Hered. 109:3283–96
    [Google Scholar]
94. Mendes FK, Hahn MW 2016. Gene tree discordance causes apparent substitution rate variation. Syst. Biol. 65:711–21
    [Google Scholar]
95. Mirarab S, Warnow T 2015. ASTRAL-II: coalescent-based species tree estimation with many hundreds of taxa and thousands of genes. Bioinformatics 31:12i44–52
    [Google Scholar]
96. Moriyama Y, Koshiba-Takeuchi K 2018. Significance of whole-genome duplications on the emergence of evolutionary novelties. Brief. Funct. Genomics In press. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/ely007
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
97. Nakatani Y, McLysaght A 2017. Genomes as documents of evolutionary history: a probabilistic macrosynteny model for the reconstruction of ancestral genomes. Bioinformatics 33:14i369–78
    [Google Scholar]
98. Nei M, Roychoudhury AK 1973. Probability of fixation of nonfunctional genes at duplicate loci. Am. Nat. 107:362–72
    [Google Scholar]
99. Nguepjop JR, Tossim H-A, Bell JM, Rami J-F, Sharma S et al. 2016. Evidence of genomic exchanges between homeologous chromosomes in a cross of peanut with newly synthesized allotetraploid hybrid. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1635
    [Google Scholar]
100. Novikova, Hohmann N, Van de Peer Y 2018. Polyploid Arabidopsis species originating around recent glaciation maxima. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 42:8–15
     [Google Scholar]
101. Ohno S. 1970. Evolution by Gene Duplication New York: Springer
102. Osborn TC, Butrille DV, Sharp AG, Pickering KJ, Parkin IAP et al. 2003. Detection and effects of a homeologous reciprocal transposition in Brassica napus. Genetics 165:1569–77
     [Google Scholar]
103. O'Toole ÁN, Hurst LD, McLysaght A 2018. Faster evolving primate genes are more likely to duplicate. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35:1107–18
     [Google Scholar]
104. Papp B, Pal C, Hurst LD 2003. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424:6945194–97
     [Google Scholar]
105. Pasquier J, Braasch I, Batzel P, Cabau C, Montfor J et al. 2017. Evolution of gene expression after whole-genome duplication: new insights from the spotted gar genome. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 328:7709–21
     [Google Scholar]
106. Pennell MW, Harmon LJ 2013. An integrative view of phylogenetic comparative methods: connections to population genetics, community ecology, and paleobiology. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1289:90–105
     [Google Scholar]
107. Pires JC, Conant GC 2016. Robust yet fragile: expression noise, protein misfolding, and gene dosage in the evolution of genomes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 50:113–31
     [Google Scholar]
108. Pires JC, Zhao J, Schranz ME, Leon EJ, Quijada PA et al. 2004. Flowering time divergence and genomic rearrangements in resynthesized Brassica polyploids (Brassicaceae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82:675–88
     [Google Scholar]
109. Powell JJ, Fitzgerald TL, Stiller J, Berkman PJ, Gardiner DM et al. 2017. The defense associated transcriptome of hexaploid wheat displays homoeolog expression and induction bias. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15:4533–43
     [Google Scholar]
110. Qi X, An H, Ragsdale AP, Hall TE, Gutenkunst RN et al. 2017. Genomic inferences of domestication events are corroborated by written records in Brassica rapa. Mol. Ecol 26:133373–88
     [Google Scholar]
111. Racimo F, Berg JJ, Pickrell JK 2018. Detecting polygenic adaptation in admixture graphs. Genetics 208:41565–84
     [Google Scholar]
112. Ren L, Cui J, Wang J, Tan H, Li W et al. 2017. Analyzing homoeolog expression provides insights into the rediploidization event in gynogenetic hybrids of Carassius auratus red var. × Cyprinus carpio. Sci. Rep. 7:113679
     [Google Scholar]
113. Renny-Byfield S, Rodgers-Melnick E, Ross-Ibarra J 2017. Gene fractionation and function in the ancient subgenomes of maize. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34:81825–32
     [Google Scholar]
114. Rice AM, McLysaght A 2017a. Dosage-sensitive genes in evolution and disease. BMC Biol 15:78
     [Google Scholar]
115. Rice AM, McLysaght A 2017b. Dosage sensitivity is a major determinant of human copy number variant pathogenicity. Nat. Commun. 8:14366
     [Google Scholar]
116. Robertson FM, Gundappa MK, Grammes F, Hvidsten TR, Redmond AK et al. 2017. Lineage-specific rediploidization is a mechanism to explain time-lags between genome duplication and evolutionary diversification. Genome Biol 18:111
     [Google Scholar]
117. Rodriguez F, Arkhipova IR 2018. Transposable elements and polyploid evolution in animals. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 49:115–23
     [Google Scholar]
118. Rohlfs RV, Nielsen R 2015. Phylogenetic ANOVA: the expression variance and evolution model for quantitative trait evolution. Syst. Biol. 64:5695–708
     [Google Scholar]
119. Roman H, Phillips MM, Sands SM 1955. Studies of polyploid Saccharomyces. I. Tetraploid segregation. Genetics 40:546–61
     [Google Scholar]
120. Ruprecht C, Proost S, Hernandez-Coronado M, Ortiz-Ramirez C, Lang D et al. 2017a. Phylogenomic analysis of gene co-expression networks reveals the evolution of functional modules. Plant J 90:3447–65
     [Google Scholar]
121. Ruprecht C, Vaid N, Proost S, Persson S, Mutwil M 2017b. Beyond genomics: studying evolution with gene coexpression networks. Trends Plant Sci 22:298–307
     [Google Scholar]
122. Sankoff D, Zheng C, Wong B 2012. A model for biased fractionation after whole genome duplication. BMC Genomics 13:Suppl. 1S8
     [Google Scholar]
123. Scannell DR, Byrne KP, Gordon JL, Wong S, Wolfe KH 2006. Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts. Nature 440:341–45
     [Google Scholar]
124. Scannell DR, Frank AC, Conant GC, Byrne KP, Woolfit M, Wolfe KP 2007. Independent sorting-out of thousands of duplicated gene pairs in two yeast species descended from a whole-genome duplication. PNAS 104:8397–402
     [Google Scholar]
125. Schnable JC, Springer NM, Freeling M 2011. Differentiation of the maize subgenomes by genome dominance and both ancient and ongoing gene loss. PNAS 108:104069–74
     [Google Scholar]
126. Schrider DR, Kern AD 2018. Supervised machine learning for population genetics: a new paradigm. Trends Genet 34:301–12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2017.12.005
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
127. Scienski K, Fay JC, Conant GC 2015. Patterns of gene conversion in duplicated yeast histones suggest strong selection on a coadapted macromolecular complex. Genome Biol. Evol. 7:123249–58
     [Google Scholar]
128. Sémon M, Wolfe KH 2007. Rearrangement rate following the whole-genome duplication in teleosts. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:860–67
     [Google Scholar]
129. Sheehan S, Song YS 2016. Deep learning for population genetic inference. PLOS Comput. Biol. 12:3e1004845
     [Google Scholar]
130. Smith SA, Brown JW, Yang Y, Bruenn R, Drummond CP et al. 2017. Disparity, diversity, and duplications in the Caryophyllales. New Phytol 217:2836–54
     [Google Scholar]
131. Solís-Lemus C, Ané C 2016. Inferring phylogenetic networks with maximum pseudolikelihood under incomplete lineage sorting. PLOS Genet 12:3e1005896
     [Google Scholar]
132. Solís-Lemus C, Bastide P, Ané C 2017. PhyloNetworks: a package for phylogenetic networks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34:123292–98
     [Google Scholar]
133. Soltis DE, Visger CJ, Marchant DB, Soltis PS 2016. Polyploidy: pitfalls and paths to a paradigm. Am. J. Bot. 103:71146–66
     [Google Scholar]
134. Soltis PS, Soltis DE 2016. Ancient WGD events as drivers of key innovations in angiosperms. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 30:159–65
     [Google Scholar]
135. Stebbins GL. 1951. Variation and Evolution in Plants New York: Columbia Univ. Press
136. Stein A, Coriton O, Rousseau-Geutin M, Samans B, Schiessl SV et al. 2017. Mapping of homoeologous chromosome exchanges influencing quantitative trait variation in Brassica napus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15:111478–89
     [Google Scholar]
137. Sun Y, Wu Y, Yang C, Sun S, Lin X et al. 2017. Segmental allotetraploidy generates extensive homoeologous expression rewiring and phenotypic diversity at the population level in rice. Mol. Ecol. 26:205451–66
     [Google Scholar]
138. Szöllősi GJ, Tannier E, Daubin V, Boussau B 2015. The inference of gene trees with species trees. Syst. Biol. 64:1e42–62
     [Google Scholar]
139. Tasdighian S, Van Bel M, Li Z, Van de Peer Y, Carretero-Paulet L, Maere S 2017. Reciprocally retained genes in the angiosperm lineage show the hallmarks of dosage balance sensitivity. Plant Cell 29:112766–85Reciprocally retained genes have constraints on sequence, function, and expression divergence in angiosperms.
     [Google Scholar]
140. Tettelin H, Masignani V, Cieslewicz MJ, Donati C, Medini D et al. 2005. Genome analysis of multiple pathogenic isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae: implications for the microbial “pan-genome.”. PNAS 102:13950–55
     [Google Scholar]
141. Thévenin A, Eib-Dor E, Ozery-Flato M, Shamir R 2014. Functional gene groups are concentrated within chromosomes, among chromosomes and in the nuclear space of the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res 42:9854–61
     [Google Scholar]
142. Thomas GWC, Ather SH, Hahn MW 2017. Gene-tree reconciliation with MUL-trees to resolve polyploidy events. Syst. Biol. 66:61007–18This article introduces GRAMPA, a method for inferring polyploidy events using multilabeled tree reconciliation.
     [Google Scholar]
143. Thompson A, Zakon HH, Kirkpatrick M 2016. Compensatory drift and the evolutionary dynamics of dosage-sensitive duplicate genes. Genetics 202:765–74
     [Google Scholar]
144. Van de Peer Y, Mizrachi E, Marchal K 2017. The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18:7411–24
     [Google Scholar]
145. van Hoek MJ, Hogeweg P 2009. Metabolic adaptation after whole genome duplication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26:112441–53
     [Google Scholar]
146. Van Iersel L, Jones M, Scornavacca C 2018. Improved maximum parsimony methods for phylogenetic networks. Syst. Biol. 67:518–42
     [Google Scholar]
147. Vicient CM, Casacuberta JM 2017. Impact of transposable elements on polyploid plant genomes. Ann. Bot. 120:2195–207
     [Google Scholar]
148. Wagner A. 2007. Energy costs constrain the evolution of gene expression. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 308:322–24
     [Google Scholar]
149. Wang L, Beissinger TM, Lorant A, Ross-Ibarra C, Ross-Ibarra J, Hufford MB 2017. The interplay of demography and selection during maize domestication and expansion. Genome Biol 18:1215
     [Google Scholar]
150. Washburn JD, Bird KA, Conant GC, Pires JC 2016. Convergent evolution and the origin of complex phenotypes in the age of systems biology. Int. J. Plant Sci. 177:305–18
     [Google Scholar]
151. Wen D, Nakhleh L 2017. Co-estimating reticulate phylogenies and gene trees from multi-locus sequence data. Syst. Biol. 67:439–57
     [Google Scholar]
152. Wen D, Yu Y, Zhu J, Nakhleh L 2018. Inferring phylogenetic networks using PhyloNet. Syst. Biol. 67:735–40
     [Google Scholar]
153. Wendel JF, Lisch D, Hu G, Mason AS 2018. The long and short of doubling down: polyploidy, epigenetics, and the temporal dynamics of genome fractionation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 49:1–7
     [Google Scholar]
154. Wisecaver JH, Borowsky AT, Tzin V, Jander G, Kliebenstein DJ, Rokas A 2017. A global co-expression network approach for connecting genes to specialized metabolic pathways in plants. Plant Cell 29:5944–59Analyzing gene co-expression networks outperforms bioinformatic predictions for identifying specialized metabolite pathways in plants.
     [Google Scholar]
155. Xie T, Yang QY, Wang XT, McLysaght A, Zhang HY 2016. Spatial colocalization of human ohnolog pairs acts to maintain dosage-balance. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33:92368–75
     [Google Scholar]
156. Xiong Z, Gaeta RT, Pires JC 2011. Homoeologous shuffling and chromosome compensation maintain genome balance in resynthesized allopolyploid Brassica napus. PNAS 108:197908–13
     [Google Scholar]
157. Yanai I, Korbel JO, Boue S, McWeeney SK, Bork P, Lercher MJ 2006. Similar gene expression profiles do not imply similar tissue functions. Trends Genet 22:3132–38
     [Google Scholar]
158. Yang J, Liu D, Wang X, Ji C, Cheng F et al. 2016. The genome sequence of allopolyploid Brassica juncea and analysis of differential homoeolog gene expression influencing selection. Nat. Genet. 48:101225–32
     [Google Scholar]
159. Zhan SH, Drori M, Goldberg EE, Otto SP, Mayrose I 2016. Phylogenetic evidence for cladogenetic polyploidization in land plants. Am. J. Bot. 103:71252–58
     [Google Scholar]
160. Zhao M, Zhang B, Lisch D, Ma J 2017. Patterns and consequences of subgenome differentiation provide insights into the nature of paleopolyploidy in plants. Plant Cell 29:2974–94
     [Google Scholar]
161. Zhu Y, Lin Z, Nakhleh L 2013. Evolution after whole-genome duplication: a network perspective. G3 3:2049–57
     [Google Scholar]
162. Zohren J, Wang N, Kardailsky I, Borrell JS, Joecker A et al. 2016. Unidirectional diploid-tetraploid introgression among British birch trees with shifting ranges shown by restriction site-associated markers. Mol. Ecol. 25:112413–26
     [Google Scholar]