1932

Abstract

This review explores the role of incentives in providing goods and services that have significant social returns not captured in private returns, and where outcomes and performances are not easy to measure. We discuss how the presence of prosocial motivation among agents involved in the provision of these goods and services changes the design of incentives. The review also emphasises how heterogeneous prosocial motivation puts a premium on selection of agents in this context. We also discuss alternative theories of prosocial motivation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-063016-103739
2018-08-02
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/10/1/annurev-economics-063016-103739.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-063016-103739&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Akerlof G, Kranton R 2005. Identity and the economics of organizations. J. Econ. Perspect. 19:19–32
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Akerlof G, Kranton R 2010. Identity Economics: How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  3. Aldashev G, Jaimovich E, Verdier T 2018. Small is beautiful: motivational misallocation in the nonprofit sector. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Andreoni J 2006. Philanthropy. Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity 2 S-C Kolm, JM Ythier 1201–69 Amsterdam: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ashraf N, Bandiera O 2017. Altruistic capital. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:570–75
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ashraf N, Bandiera O 2018. Social incentives in organizations. Annu. Rev. Econ. 10:439–63
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ashraf N, Bandiera O, Jack BK 2014. No margin, no mission? A field experiment on incentives for public service delivery. J. Public Econ. 120:1–17
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ashraf N, Bandiera O, Lee S 2018. Losing prosociality in the quest for talent? Sorting, selection and performance in public service delivery Work. Pap., London School Econ.
  9. Auriol E, Brilon S 2014. Anti-social behavior in profit and nonprofit organizations. J. Public Econ. 117:149–61
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Auriol E, Renault R 2008. Status and incentives. Rand J. Econ. 39:1305–26
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Baker GP 1992. Incentive contracts and performance measurement. J. Political Econ. 100:598–614
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ballou J, Weisbrod B 2003. Managerial rewards and the behavior of for-profit, governmental, and nonprofit organizations: evidence from the hospital industry. J. Public Econ. 87:91895–920
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Barr A, Serra D, Serneels P 2011. Intrinsic motivations and the non-profit health sector: evidence from Ethiopia. Personal. Individ. Differ. 51:3309–14
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Benabou R, Tirole J 2003. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev. Econ. Stud. 70:3489–520
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Benabou R, Tirole J 2006. Incentives and prosocial behavior. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:51652–78
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Berg E, Ghatak M, Manjula R, Rajasekhar D, Roy S 2018. Motivating knowledge agents: Can incentive pay overcome social distance. Econ. J. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Besley T 2006. Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  18. Besley T, Ghatak M 2005. Competition and incentives with motivated agents. Am. Econ. Rev. 95:3616–36
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Besley T, Ghatak M 2007. Retailing public goods: the economics of corporate social responsibility. J. Public Econ. 91:91645–63
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Besley T, Ghatak M 2008. Status incentives. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:2206–11
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Besley T, Ghatak M 2017.a The evolution of motivation Work. Pap., London School Econ.
  22. Besley T, Ghatak M 2017.b Profit with purpose? A theory of social enterprise. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 9:319–58
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Bowles S 1998. Endogenous preferences: the cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions. J. Econ. Lit. 36:175–111
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Bowles S 2016. The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives are No Substitute for Good Citizens New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  25. Bradler C, Dur R, Neckerman S, Non A 2016. Employee recognition and performance: a field experiment. Manag. Sci. 62:113085–99
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Coase RH 1960. The problem of social cost. J. Law Econ. 3:1–44
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dal Bó E, Finan F, Rossi MA 2013. Strengthening state capabilities: the role of financial incentives in the call to public service. Q. J. Econ. 128:31169–218
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Deci EL, Ryan RM 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior New York: Plenum
  29. Delfgaauw J, Dur R 2007. Signaling and screening of workers' motivation. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 62:4605–24
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Delfgaauw J, Dur R 2008. Incentives and workers' motivation in the public sector. Econ. J. 118:525171–91
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Delfgaauw J, Dur R 2010. Managerial talent, motivation, and self-selection into public management. J. Public Econ. 94:9654–60
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Deserranno E 2017. Financial incentives as signals: experimental evidence from the recruitment of village promoters in Uganda Work. Pap Northwestern Univ. Evanston, IL:
  33. Dixit A 2002. Incentives and organizations in the public sector: an interpretive review. J. Hum. Resourc. 37:4696–727
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Dur R, Zoutenbier R 2014. Working for a good cause. Public Adm. Rev. 74:2144–55
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Dur R, Zoutenbier R 2015. Intrinsic motivation of public sector employees: evidence for Germany. Ger. Econ. Rev. 16:3343–66
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Durkheim E 1956. Education and Sociology Glencoe, IL: Free Press
  37. Finan F, Olken BA, Pande R 2017. The personnel economics of the developing state. Handbook of Economic Field Experiments 2 AV Banerjee, E Duflo 467–514 Amsterdam: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Francois P 2000. Public service motivation as an argument for government provision. J. Public Econ. 78:275–99
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Francois P 2007. Making a difference. Rand J. Econ. 38:3714–32
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Francois P, Vlassopoulos M 2008. Pro-social motivation and the delivery of social services. CESifo Econ. Stud. 54:22–54
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Frank RH 1985. The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. Am. Econ. Rev. 75:1101–16
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Frey BS 1997. Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Motivation Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
  43. Frey BS, Gallus J 2017. Honours Versus Money: The Economics of Awards Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  44. Ghatak M, Morelli M, Sjöström T 2007. Entrepreneurial talent, occupational choice, and trickle up policies. J. Econ. Theory 137:127–48
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Gneezy U, Rustichini A 2000. Pay enough or don't pay at all. Q. J. Econ. 115:3791–81
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Gregg P, Grout P, Ratcliffe A, Smith S, Windmeijer F 2011. How important is pro-social behaviour in the delivery of public services. J. Public Econ. 95:758–66
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Hagen RJ 2006. Samaritan agents? On the strategic delegation of aid policy. J. Dev. Econ. 79:1249–63
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Hart O, Zingales L 2017. Companies should maximize shareholder welfare not market value. J. Law Finance Account. 2:2247–74
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Holmström B 1999. Managerial incentive problems: a dynamic perspective. Rev. Econ. Stud. 66:1169–82
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Holmström B, Milgrom P 1991. Multi-task principal-agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law Econ. Organ. 7:24–52
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Kamenica E 2012. Behavioral economics and psychology of incentives. Annu. Rev. Econ. 4:427–52
    [Google Scholar]
  52. LeGrand J 2003. Motivation, Agency and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  53. Moynihan DP, Pandey SK 2007. The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Adm. Rev. 67:140–53
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Muralidharan K, Sundararaman V 2011. Teacher performance pay: experimental evidence from India. J. Political Econ. 119:139–77
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Murdock K 2003. Intrinsic motivation and optimal incentive contracts. RAND J. Econ. 33:4650–71
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Newhouse JP 1970. Toward a theory of nonprofit institutions: an economic model of a hospital. Am. Econ. Rev. 60:164–74
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Niskanen WA 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government Chicago: Aldine
  58. Osborne D, Gaebler T 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
  59. Perry JL 1996. Measuring public service motivation: an assessment of construct reliability and validity. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 6:15–22
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Postel-Vinay F 2015. Does it pay to be a public-sector employee? World Labor Rep IZA Inst. Labor Econ. Bonn, Ger: https://wol.iza.org/uploads/articles/156/pdfs/does-it-pay-to-be-public-sector-employee.pdf
  61. Prendergast C 1999. The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econ. Lit. 37:17–63
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Prendergast C 2003. The limits of bureaucratic efficiency. J. Political Econ. 111:5929–58
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Prendergast C 2007. The motivation and bias of bureaucrats. Am. Econ. Rev. 97:1180–96
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Prendergast C 2008. Intrinsic motivation and incentives. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:2201–5
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Propper C, Wilson D 2012. The use of performance measures in health care systems. The Elgar Companion to Health Economics AM Jones 350–58 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. , 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Rasul I, Rogger D 2013. Management of bureaucrats and public service delivery: evidence from the Nigerian civil service Work. Pap., Univ. Coll. London
  67. Ritz A, Brewer GA, Neumann O 2016. Public service motivation: a systematic literature review and outlook. Public Adm. Rev. 76:3414–26
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Ryan RM, Deci EL 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25:54–67
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Sandel M 2012. What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limit of Markets London: Allen Lane
  70. Scharf K 2014. Impure pro-social motivation in charity provision: warm glow charities and implications for public funding. J. Public Econ. 114:50–57
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Sen AK 1977. Rational fools: a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philos. Public Aff. 6:4317–44
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Smith A 1976 (1759). The Theory of Moral Sentiments DD Raphael, AL Macfie Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  73. Tirole J 1994. The internal organization of government. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 46:11–29
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Titmuss R 1970. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy London: Allen and Unwin
  75. Weber M 1978 (1922). Economy and Society Berkeley, CA: Univ. Calif. Press
  76. Weisbrod BA 1988. The Nonprofit Economy Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  77. Wilson JQ 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It New York: Basic Books
  78. Woessmann L 2016. The importance of school systems: evidence from international differences in student achievement. J. Econ. Perspect. 30:33–32
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Wooders M 1999. Multijurisdictional economies, the Tiebout hypothesis, and sorting. PNAS 96:1910585–87
    [Google Scholar]
  80. World Bank. 2004. World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-063016-103739
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error