1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Economics
  4. Volume 10, 2018
  5. Article

Annual Review of Economics

Volume 10, 2018

Sorting in the Labor Market

Abstract

This review surveys the literature on sorting in the labor market. There are inherent differences in worker ability and across-firm productivity. Two fundamental questions are whether the exact composition of skills of workers and productivity of firms affects output and how this composition determines the equilibrium allocation of workers within a firm and between firms. There has been a surge of research investigating the causes and consequences of the process of allocation of heterogeneous workers to firms. The focus in this review is on theory that sheds light on open questions in macroeconomics, labor, and industrial organization, with a particular emphasis on the role of firm size. Those models allow us to infer from the observed sorting patterns (who matches with whom) what the underlying technological determinants are and how they have evolved in recent decades. Furthermore, they help us understand the technological origins of important labor market trends, such as the increase in wage inequality and the change in labor market and firm dynamics.

Keyword(s): assortative matching, complementarities, firm size distribution, inequality, labor markets, sorting, supermodularity, unemployment, wages
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053526
2018-08-02
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/10/1/annurev-economics-080217-053526.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053526&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abowd JM, Kramarz F, Margolis DN 1999. High wage workers and high wage firms. Econometrica 67:2251–333
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Acemoglu D, Hawkins WB 2014. Search with multi-worker firms. Theor. Econ. 9:3583–628
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Acemoglu D, Shimer R 1999. Efficient unemployment insurance. J. Political Econ. 107:5893–928
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Ackerberg DA, Botticini M 2002. Endogenous matching and the empirical determinants of contract form. J. Political Econ. 110:3564–91
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson A, Smith L 2010. Assortative matching with evolving human capital. Rev. Econ. Stud. 77:13–29
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Antràs P, Garicano L, Rossi-Hansberg E 2006. Offshoring in a knowledge economy. Q. J. Econ. 121:131–77
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Atakan A 2006. Assortative matching with explicit search costs. Econometrica 74:667–80
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Athey S, Katz LF, Krueger AB, Levitt S, Poterba J 2007. What does performance in graduate school predict? Graduate economics education and student outcomes. Am. Econ. Rev. 97:2512–18
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bagger J, Lentz R 2014. An empirical model of wage dispersion with sorting NBER Work. Pap 20031
  10. Barth E, Bryson A, Davis JC, Freeman R 2014. It's where you work: increases in earnings dispersion across establishments and individuals in the US NBER Work. Pap 20447
  11. Becker G 1973. A theory of marriage I. J. Political Econ. 81:813–46
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Benguria F 2015. Inequality between and within firms: evidence from Brazil Work. Pap., Gatton Coll. Bus. Econ., Univ. Ky., Lexington
  13. Bloch F, Ryder H 1999. Two-sided search, marriages, and matchmakers. Int. Econ. Rev. 41:93–115
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bombardini M, Gallipoli G, Pupato G 2014. Unobservable skill dispersion and comparative advantage. J. Int. Econ. 92:2317–29
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Bonhomme S, Lamadon T, Manresa E 2015. A distributional framework for matched employer employee data Unpublished manuscript, Univ. Chicago
  16. Burdett K, Coles M 1997. Marriage and class. Q. J. Econ. 112:141–68
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Cairo I 2013. The slowdown in business employment dynamics: the role of changing skill demands Unpublished manuscript, Univ. Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
  18. Card D, Heining J, Kline P 2013. Workplace heterogeneity and the rise of West German wage inequality. Q. J. Econ. 128:3967–1015
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Chade H 2001. Two-sided search and perfect segregation with fixed search costs. Math. Soc. Sci. 42:31–51
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Chade H, Eeckhout J 2014. Stochastic sorting Unpublished manuscript, Univ. Coll. London
  21. Chade H, Eeckhout J 2017. Competing teams Work. Pap., Univ. Coll. London
  22. Chade H, Eeckhout J 2018. Matching information. Theor. Econ. 13:377–414
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Chade H, Eeckhout J, Smith L 2017. Sorting through search and matching models in economics. J. Econ. Lit. 55:2493–544
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Chiappori P-A, Reny P 2016. Matching to share risk. Theor. Econ. 11:227–51
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Choo E, Siow A 2006. Who marries whom and why. J. Political Econ. 114:1175–201
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Conley JP, Önder AS 2014. The research productivity of new PhDs in economics: the surprisingly high non-success of the successful. J. Econ. Perspect. 28:3205–15
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Costinot A 2009. An elementary theory of comparative advantage. Econometrica 77:41165–92
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Costinot A, Vogel J 2015. Beyond Ricardo: assignment models in international trade. Economics 7:131–62
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Eeckhout J 1999. Bilateral search and vertical heterogeneity. Int. Econ. Rev. 40:869–87
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Eeckhout J 2006. Local supermodularity and unique assortative matching Discuss. Pap., Univ. Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
  31. Eeckhout J, Jovanovic B 2011. Occupational choice and development. J. Econ. Theory 147:2657–83
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Eeckhout J, Kircher P 2010. Sorting and decentralized price competition. Econometrica 78:539–74
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Eeckhout J, Kircher P 2011. Identifying sorting: in theory. Rev. Econ. Stud. 78:3872–906
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Eeckhout J, Kircher P 2018. Assortative matching with large firms. Econometrica 86:85–132
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Eeckhout J, Pinheiro R, Schmidheiny K 2014. Spatial sorting. J. Political Econ. 122:3554–620
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Eeckhout J, Sepahsalari A 2014. The effect of asset holdings on worker productivity Discuss. Pap., Univ. Coll. London
  37. Eeckhout J, Weng X 2010. Assortative learning Work. Pap., Univ. Coll. London
  38. Eeckhout J, Weng X 2017. The technological origins of the decline in labor market dynamism Discuss. Pap., Univ. Coll. London
  39. Gabaix X, Landier A 2008. Why has CEO pay increased so much. Q. J. Econ. 123:49–100
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Gale D, Shapley L 1962. College admissions and the stability of marriage. Am. Math. Mon. 69:9–15
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Galichon A 2016. Optimal Transport Methods in Economics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  42. Galichon A, Salanié B 2015. Cupid's invisible hand: social surplus and identification in matching models Unpublished manuscript, Columbia Univ., New York
  43. Garicano L 2000. Hierarchies and the organization of knowledge in production. J. Political Econ. 108:5874–904
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Golosov M, Maziero P, Menzio G 2012. Taxation and redistribution of residual income inequality Unpublished manuscript, Univ. Pa., Philadelphia
  45. Gretsky NE, Ostroy JM, Zame WR 1992. The nonatomic assignment model. Econ. Theory 2:1103–27
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Grossman GM, Helpman E 2014. Growth, trade, and inequality NBER Work. Pap 20502
  47. Grossman GM, Helpman E, Kircher P 2017. Matching, sorting, and the distributional effects of international trade. J. Political Econ. 125:1224–64
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Grossman GM, Maggi G 2000. Diversity and trade. Am. Econ. Rev. 90:51255–75
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Hagedorn M, Law TH, Manovskii I 2017. Identifying equilibrium models of labor market sorting. Econometrica 85:129–65
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Holmström B, Milgrom P 1987. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of incentives. Econometrica 55:303–28
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Jovanovic B 1979. Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Political Econ. 87:972–90
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Kaas L, Kircher P 2014. Learning and Recombination New York: NYU Press
  53. Kantorovich LV 1948. On a problem of Monge. J. Math. Sci. 133:1383
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Kelso AS Jr., Crawford VP 1982. Job matching, coalition formation, and gross substitutes. Econometrica 50:61483–504
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Koopmans T, Beckmann M 1957. Assignment problems and the location of economic activities. Econometrica 25:153–76
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Kremer M 1993. The O-ring theory of economic development. Q. J. Econ. 108:3551–75
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Legros P, Newman A 2007. Beauty is a beast, frog is a prince: assortative matching with nontransferabilities. Econometrica 75:1073–102
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Lindenlaub I 2017. Sorting multidimensional types: theory and application. Rev. Econ. Stud. 84:2718–89
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Lindenlaub I, Postel-Vinay F 2016. Multidimensional sorting under random search Unpublished manuscript, Univ. Coll. London
  60. Lise J, Meghir C, Robin J-M 2016. Matching, sorting and wages. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 19:63–87
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Lise J, Postel-Vinay F 2016. Multidimensional skills, sorting, and human capital accumulation Unpublished manuscript, Univ. Coll. London
  62. Lopes de Melo R 2018. Firm wage differentials and labor market sorting: reconciling theory and evidence. J. Political Econ. 126:313–46
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Lucas RE 1978. On the size distribution of business firms. Bell J. Econ. 9:2508–23
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Marshak J, Radner R 1972. Economic Theory of Teams New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  65. Mas A, Moretti E 2009. Peers at work. Am. Econ. Rev. 99:1112–45
     [Google Scholar]
  66. McNamara J, Collins E 1990. The job-search problem as an employer-candidate game. J. Appl. Probab. 28:815–27
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Monge G 1781. Mémoire sur la Théorie des Déblais et des Remblais Paris: Impr. R.
  68. Morgan P 1996. Two-sided search and matching Work. Pap., State Univ. N. Y Buffalo, NY:
  69. Nelson P 1970. Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econ. 78:2311–29
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Ohnsorge F, Trefler D 2007. Sorting it out: international trade with heterogeneous workers. J. Political Econ. 115:5868–92
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Pinheiro R, Eeckhout J 2014. Diverse organizations and the competition for talent. Int. Econ. Rev. 55:3625–64
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Radner R 1962. Team decision problems. Ann. Math. Stat. 33:857–81
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Rogerson R, Shimer R, Wright R 2005. Search-theoretic models of the labor market: a survey. J. Econ. Lit. 43:959–88
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Roth AE, Sotomayor M 1990. Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  75. Schulhofer-Wohl S 2006. Negative assortative matching of risk-averse agents with transferable expected utility. Econ. Lett. 92:3383–88
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Serfes K 2005. Risk sharing versus incentives: contract design under two-sided heterogeneity. Econ. Lett. 88:3343–49
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Shapley L, Shubik M 1971. The assignment game I: the core. Int. J. Game Theory 1:111–30
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Shimer R, Smith L 2000. Assortative matching and search. Econometrica 68:2343–69
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Smith E 1999. Search, concave production, and optimal firm size. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 2:2456–71
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Smith L 2006. Assortative matching and search. J. Political Econ. 114:61124–46
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Smith L 2011. Frictional matching models. Annu. Rev. Econ. 3:319–38
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Song J, Price DJ, Guvenen F, Bloom N, von Wachter T 2015. Firming up inequality NBER Work. Pap 21199
  83. Sorkin I 2015. Ranking firms using revealed preference Unpublished manuscript, Univ. Mich., Ann Arbor
  84. Terviö M 2008. The difference that CEOs make: an assignment model approach. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:3642–68
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Teulings CN, Gautier PA 2004. The right man for the job. Rev. Econ. Stud. 71:2553–80
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Villani C 2009. Optimal Transport: Old and New Berlin: Springer
  87. Vlachos J, Lindqvist E, Hakanson C 2015. Firms and skills: the evolution of worker sorting Work. Pap. 9, Inst. Eval. Labour Mark. Educ. Policy, Stockholm
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053526
Loading
Sorting in the Labor Market
Annual Review of Economics 10, 1 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053526
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053526
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053526
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error