1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Economics
  4. Volume 11, 2019
  5. Article

Annual Review of Economics

Volume 11, 2019

Experiments and Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries

Abstract

We discuss the value of experiments in illuminating constraints on the growth of firms in developing countries. Experiments have provided insight into both the value and the difficulty of alleviating capital constraints in small firms. They suggest that urban, low-skilled labor markets appear to work reasonably well for firms, although there is a suggestion that frictions in markets for skilled workers may have more effect on firms. While observational data suggest that managerial training is important, experiments have shown that the traditional methods of delivering this training to small enterprises, at least, are not effective. Finally, while most work has focused on alleviating supply constraints, recent experiments have shown that positive demand shocks can be sufficient to generate firm growth. Experiments have been particularly illuminating in uncovering patterns in individual decision making, showing how agents respond to the specific changes in circumstances or incentives generated by the experiment. They are most valuable when they complement insight driven by theory.

Keyword(s): experiments in firms, firm growth, JEL D25, JEL L26, JEL O16, JEL O17, SME constraints
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030246
2019-08-02
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/11/1/annurev-economics-080218-030246.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030246&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abebe G, Caria S, Fafchamps M, Falco P, Franklin S, Quinn S 2018a. Anonymity or distance? Job search and labour market exclusion in a growing African city Work. Pap., Oxford Univ Oxford, UK:
  2. Abebe G, Caria S, Ortiz-Ospina E 2018b. The selection of talent: experimental and structural evidence from Ethiopia. Work. Pap., Oxford Univ Oxford, UK:
  3. Abebe G, Fafchamps M, Koelle M, Quinn S 2019. Learning by managing: a field experiment with aspiring entrepreneurs Work. Pap., Oxford Univ Oxford, UK:
  4. Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Mitton T 2009. Determinants of vertical integration: financial development and contracting costs. J. Finance 6431251–90
  5. Ackerberg DA, Caves K, Frazer G 2015. Identification properties of recent production function estimators. Econometrica 832411–51
  6. Alfonsi L, Bandiera O, Bassi V, Burgess R, Rasul I et al. 2017. Tackling youth unemployment: evidence from a labor market experiment in Uganda Work. Pap., Suntory Toyota Int. Cent. Econ. Relat. Discip London School Econ:
  7. Anderson SJ, Chandy R, Zia B 2018. Pathways to profits: the impact of marketing vs. finance skills on business performance. Manag. Sci 64125559–83
  8. Andrabi T, Das J, Khwaja AI 2017. Report cards: the impact of providing school and child test scores on educational markets. Am. Econ. Rev. 10761535–63
  9. Angelucci M, Karlan D, Zinman J 2015. Microcredit impacts: evidence from a randomized microcredit program placement experiment by Compartamos Banco. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 71151–82
  10. Arellano M, Bond S. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econ. Stud. 582277–97
  11. Atkin D, Khandelwal AK, Osman A 2017. Exporting and firm performance: evidence from a randomized experiment. Q. J. Econ. 1322551–615
  12. Attanasio O, Augsburg B, De Haas R, Fitzsimons E, Harmgart H 2015. The impacts of microfinance: evidence from joint-liability lending in Mongolia. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 7190–122
  13. Augsburg B, De Haas R, Harmgart H, Meghir C 2015. The impacts of microcredit: evidence from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 71183–203
  14. Bandiera O, Hansen S, Pratt A, Sadun R 2017. CEO behavior and firm performance Work. Pap. 17–083 Harvard Bus. School Cambridge, MA:
  15. Banerjee A, Duflo E. 2014. Do firms want to borrow more? Testing credit constraints using a directed lending program. Rev. Econ. Stud. 812572–607
  16. Banerjee A, Duflo E, Glennerster R, Kinnan C 2015a. The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 7122–53
  17. Banerjee A, Karlan D, Zinman J 2015b. Six randomized evaluations of microcredit: introduction and further steps. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 711–21
  18. Bassi V, Nansamba A. 2017. Information frictions in the labor market: evidence from a field experiment in Uganda Unpublished manuscript, Univ College London:
  19. Beaman L, Keleher N, Magruder J 2018. Do job networks disadvantage women? Evidence from a recruitment experiment in Malawi. J. Labor Econ. 361121–57
  20. Beaman L, Magruder J. 2012. Who gets the job referral? Evidence from a social networks experiment. Am. Econ. Rev. 10273574–93
  21. Bergquist LF. 2017. Pass-through, competition and entry in agricultural markets: experimental evidence from Kenya Work. Pap., Univ. Mich Ann Arbor:
  22. Bernstein S, Colonnelli E, Malacrino D, McQuade T 2018. Who creates new firms when local opportunities arise? NBER Work. Pap 25112
  23. Blattman C, Dercon S. 2018. The impacts of industrial and entrepreneurial work on income and health: experimental evidence from Ethiopia. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 1031–38
  24. Bloom N, Eifert B, Mahajan A, McKenzie D, Roberts J 2013. Does management matter? Evidence from India. Q. J. Econ. 12811–51
  25. Bloom N, Sadun R, Van Reenen J 2012. Americans do IT better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. Am. Econ. Rev. 1021167–201
  26. Bloom N, Van Reenen J 2007. Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Q. J. Econ. 12241351–408
  27. Blundell R, Bond S. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econom. 87115–43
  28. Boehm L, Oberfield E. 2018. Misallocation in the market for inputs: enforcement and the organization of production Work. Pap., Princeton Univ Princeton, NJ:
  29. Boettke PJ. 2002. Information and knowledge: Austrian economics in search of its uniqueness. Rev. Austrian Econ. 15263–74
  30. Brooks W, Donovan K, Johnson TR 2018. Mentors or teachers? Microenterprise training in Kenya. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 104196–221
  31. Bruhn M, Karlan D, Schoar A 2018. The impact of consulting services on small and medium enterprises: evidence from a randomized trial in Mexico. J. Political Econ. 1262635–87
  32. Busso M, Galiani S. 2019. The causal effect of competition on prices and quality: evidence from a field experiment. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 11133–56
  33. Cai J, Szeidl A. 2018. Interfirm relationships and business performance. Q. J. Econ. 13331229–82
  34. Campos F, Frese M, Goldstein M, Iacovone L, Johnson HC et al. 2017. Teaching personal initiative beats traditional training in boosting small business in West Africa. Science 35763571287–90
  35. Casaburi L, Reed T. 2017. Competition in agricultural markets: an experimental approach Work. Pap., Univ. Zurich Switz:
  36. Crepon B, Devoto F, Duflo E, Parienté W 2015. Estimating the impact of microcredit on those who take it up: evidence from a randomized experiment in Morocco. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 71123–50
  37. Cunha J, De Giorgi D, Jayachandran S 2019. The price effects of cash versus in-kind transfers. Rev. Econ. Stud. 861240–81
  38. De Loecker J, Goldberg PK 2014. Firm performance in the global market. Annu. Rev. Econ. 6201–27
  39. De Mel S, McKenzie D, Woodruff C 2008. Returns to capital in microenterprises: evidence from a field experiment. Q. J. Econ. 12341329–72
  40. De Mel S, McKenzie D, Woodruff C 2012. One-time transfers of cash or capital have long-lasting effects on microenterprises in Sri Lanka. Science 335962–66
  41. De Mel S, McKenzie D, Woodruff C 2013. The demand for, and consequences of, formalization among informal firms in Sri Lanka. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 52122–50
  42. De Mel S, McKenzie D, Woodruff C 2018. Micro-equity for microenterprises Work. Pap., Oxford Univ Oxford, UK:
  43. De Mel S, McKenzie D, Woodruff C 2019. Labor drops: experimental evidence on the return to additional labor in microenterprises. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 111202–35
  44. Dlugosch TJ, Klinger B, Frese M, Klehe UC 2018. Personality-based selection of entrepreneurial borrowers to reduce credit risk: two studies on prediction models in low- and high-stakes settings in developing countries. J. Organ. Behav. 395612–28
  45. Fafchamps M, McKenzie D, Quinn S, Woodruff C 2014. Microenterprise growth and the flypaper effect: evidence from a randomized experiment in Ghana. J. Dev. Econ. 106211–26
  46. Fafchamps M, Quinn S. 2016. Networks and manufacturing firms in Africa: results from a randomized field experiment. World Bank Econ. Rev. 323656–75
  47. Fafchamps M, Woodruff C. 2017. Identifying gazelles: expert panels versus surveys as a means to identify firms with rapid growth potential. World Bank Econ. Rev. 313670–86
  48. Ferraz C, Finan F, Szerman D 2015. Procuring firm growth: the effects of government purchases on firm dynamics NBER Work. Pap 21219
  49. Field E, Jayachandran S, Pande R, Nigol R 2016. Friendship at work: Can peer effects catalyze female entrepreneurship?. Am. Econ. J. Policy 82125–53
  50. Field E, Pande R, Papp J, Rigol N 2013. Does the classic microfinance model discourage entrepreneurship among the poor? Experimental evidence from India. Am. Econ. Rev. 10362196–226
  51. Fischer G. 2013. Contract structure, risk-sharing, and investment choice. Econometrica 81883–939
  52. Gandhi A, Navarro S, Rivers D 2019. On the identification of gross output production functions. J. Political Econ. In press
  53. Ghani E, Goswami AG, Kerr WR 2016. Highway to success: the impact of the golden quadrilateral project for the location and performance of Indian manufacturing. Econ. J. 126317–57
  54. Gibbons R, Henderson R. 2012. What do managers do? Exploring persistent performance differences among seemingly similar enterprises. The Handbook of Organizational Economics R Gibbons, J Roberts 680–731 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  55. Hardy M, McCasland J. 2017. Are small firms labor constrained? Experimental evidence from Ghana Work. Pap., New York Univ. Abu Dhabi, UAE
  56. Hayek FA. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. Am. Econ. Rev. 354519–30
  57. Hayek FA. 1988. The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism WW Bartley III, ed Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  58. Higgins S. 2018. Financial technology adoption Work. Pap., Univ. Calif Berkeley:
  59. Hsieh CT, Klenow PJ. 2009. Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Q. J. Econ. 12441403–48
  60. Hsieh CT, Olken BA. 2014. The missing “missing middle.”. J. Econ. Perspect. 28389–108
  61. Hussam R, Rigol N, Roth BN 2017. Targeting high ability entrepreneurs using community information: mechanism design in the field PEDL Work. Pap., Cent. Econ. Policy Res Washington, DC:
  62. Jensen R. 2007. The digital provide: information (technology), market performance and welfare in the South Indian fisheries sector. Q. J. Econ. 1223879–924
  63. Jensen R, Miller NH. 2018. Market integration, demand and the growth of firms: evidence from a natural experiment in India. Am. Econ. Rev. 108123583–625
  64. Kahneman D, Klein G. 2009. Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. Am. Psychol. 64515–26
  65. Karlan D, Zinman J. 2011. Microcredit in theory and practice: using randomized credit scoring for impact evaluation. Science 33260351278–84
  66. Karlan D, Zinman J. 2019. Long-run price elasticities of demand for microcredit: Evidence from a countrywide field experiment in Mexico. Rev. Econ. Stud. In press
  67. Kerr W, Lerner J, Schoar A 2014a. The consequences of entrepreneurial finance: evidence from angel financings. Rev. Financ. Stud. 27120–55
  68. Kerr W, Nanada R, Rhodes-Kropf M 2014b. Entrepreneurship as experimentation. J. Econ. Perspect. 28325–48
  69. Klinger B, Schündeln M. 2011. Can entrepreneurial activity be taught? Quasi-experimental evidence from Central America. World Dev 3991592–610
  70. La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R 1997. Trust in large organizations. Am. Econ. Rev. 872333–38
  71. Lafortune J, Perticará M, Tessada J 2018. The benefits of diversity: peer effects in an adult training program in Chile Work. Pap., Pontif. Univ. Catól. Chile Santiago:
  72. Lagakos D. 2016. Explaining cross-country productivity differences in retail trade. J. Political Econ. 1242579–620
  73. Lagakos D, Moll B, Porzio T, Qian N, Schoellman T 2018. Life cycle wage growth across countries. J. Political Econ. 1262797–849
  74. Leaven L, Woodruff C. 2007. The quality of the legal system, firm ownership, and firm size. Rev. Econ. Stat. 894601–14
  75. Lemos R, Scur D. 2018. All in the family? CEO choice and firm organization Discuss. Pap. CEPDP1528, Cent. Econ. Perform London School Econ:
  76. Levinsohn J, Petrin A. 2003. Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev. Econ. Stud. 702317–41
  77. Macchiavello R, Menzel A, Rabbani A, Woodruff C 2018. Challenges of change: an experiment training women to manage in the Bangladeshi garment sector Work. Pap., Oxford Univ Oxford, UK:
  78. McCaig B, Pavcnik N. 2016. Out with the old and unproductive, in with the new and similarly unproductive GLM|LIC Work. Pap. 23, Inst. Labor Econ Bonn, Ger:
  79. McKenzie D. 2017a. How effective are active labor market policies in developing countries? A critical review of recent evidence. World Bank Res. Obs. 322127–54
  80. McKenzie D. 2017b. Identifying and spurring high-growth entrepreneurship: experimental evidence from a business plan competition. Am. Econ. Rev. 10782278–307
  81. McKenzie D, Sansone D. 2017. Man vs. machine in predicting successful entrepreneurs: evidence from a business plan competition in Nigeria Policy Res. Work. Pap. WPS 8271 World Bank Washington, DC:
  82. McKenzie D, Woodruff C. 2008. Experimental evidence on returns to capital and access to finance in Mexico. World Bank Econ. Rev. 223457–82
  83. McKenzie D, Woodruff C. 2013. What are we learning from business training and entrepreneurship evaluations around the developing world?. World Bank Res. Obs. 29148–82
  84. McKenzie D, Woodruff C. 2017. Business practices in small firms in developing countries. Manag. Sci. 6392967–81
  85. McMillan J, Woodruff C. 1999. Interfirm relationships and informal credit in Vietnam. Q. J. Econ. 11441285–320
  86. Meager R. 2018. Aggregating distributional treatment effects: a Bayesian hierarchical analysis of the microcredit literature Work. Pap London Sch. Econ:
  87. Meager R. 2019. Understanding the average impact of microcredit expansions: a Bayesian hierarchical analysis of seven randomized experiments. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 11157–91
  88. Mitra S, Mookherjee D, Torero M, Visaria S 2018. Asymmetric information and middleman margins: an experiment with Indian potato farmers. Rev. Econ. Stat. 10011–13
  89. Oğuz F. 2010. Hayek on tacit knowledge. J. Inst. Econ. 62145–65
  90. Olley GS, Pakes A. 1996. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 641263–97
  91. Rajan RG, Zingales L. 1998. Financial dependence and growth. Am. Econ. Rev. 883559–86
  92. Tarozzi A, Desai J, Johnson K 2015. The impacts of microcredit: evidence from Ethiopia. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 7154–89
  93. Tendler J. 1997. Good Government in the Tropics Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press. , 1st ed.
  94. Tendler J, Alves M. 1996. Small firms and their helpers: lessons on demand. World Dev 243407–26
  95. Ulyssea G. 2018. Firms, informality, and development: theory and evidence from Brazil. Am. Econ. Rev. 10882015–47
  96. Witte M. 2018. Job referrals and strategic network formation: experimental evidence from urban neighbourhoods in Ethiopia Work. Pap., Oxford Univ Oxford, UK:
  97. Yunus M. 1989. Grameen Bank: organization and operation. Microenterprises in Developing Countries J Levitsky 144–61 London: Intermed. Technol. Publ
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030246
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error