1932

Abstract

This review uses the empirical analysis of portfolio choice to illustrate econometric issues that arise in decision problems. Subjective expected utility (SEU) can provide normative guidance to an investor making a portfolio choice. The investor, however, may have doubts on the specification of the distribution and may seek a decision theory that is less sensitive to the specification. I consider three such theories: maxmin expected utility, variational preferences (including multiplier and divergence preferences and the associated constraint preferences), and smooth ambiguity preferences. I use a simple two-period model to illustrate their application. Normative empirical work on portfolio choice is mainly in the SEU framework, and bringing in ideas from robust decision theory may be fruitful.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-042544
2020-08-02
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/12/1/annurev-economics-081919-042544.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-042544&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson EW, Hansen LP, Sargent TJ 2003. A quartet of semigroups for model specification, robustness, prices of risk, and model detection. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 1:68–123
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anscombe FJ, Aumann RJ. 1963. A definition of subjective probability. Ann. Math. Stat. 34:199–205
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barberis N. 2000. Investing for the long run when returns are predictable. J. Finance 55:225–64
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blackwell D, Girshick MA. 1954. Theory of Games and Statistical Decisions New York: Wiley
  5. Campbell JY. 1999. Asset prices, consumption, and the business cycle. Handbook of Macroeconomics 1: JB Taylor, M Woodford 1231–303 Amsterdam: North Holland
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell JY, Viceira LM. 2002. Strategic Asset Allocation: Portfolio Choice for Long-Term Investors Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  7. Chamberlain G. 2000a. Econometrics and decision theory. J. Econom. 95:255–83
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chamberlain G. 2000b. Econometric applications of maxmin expected utility. J. Appl. Econom. 15:625–44
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Christensen T, Connault B. 2019. Counterfactual sensitivity and robustness arXiv:1904.00989v2 [econ.EM]
  10. Diaconis P, Skyrms B. 2018. Ten Great Ideas About Chance Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  11. Dupuis P, Ellis RS. 1997. A Weak Convergence Approach to the Theory of Large Deviations New York: Wiley
  12. Ellsberg D. 1961. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q. J. Econ. 75:643–69
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Epstein LG, Schneider M. 2003. Recursive multiple-priors. J. Econ. Theory 113:1–31
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Epstein LG, Zin SE. 1989. Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: a theoretical framework. Econometrica 57:937–69
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Epstein LG, Zin SE. 1991. Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: an empirical analysis. J. Political Econ. 99:263–86
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ferguson TS. 1967. Mathematical Statistics: A Decision Theoretic Approach New York: Academic
  17. Gilboa I, Schmeidler D. 1989. Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econ. 18:141–53
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Good IJ. 1952. Rational decisions. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 14:107–14
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Grossman SJ, Shiller RJ. 1981. The determinants of the variability of stock market prices. Am. Econ. Rev. 71:222–27
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gumen A, Savochkin A. 2013. Dynamically stable preferences. J. Econ. Theory 148:1487–508
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hanany E, Klibanoff P. 2007. Updating preferences with multiple priors. Theor. Econ. 2:261–98
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hansen LP, Miao J. 2018. Aversion to ambiguity and model misspecification in dynamic stochastic environments. PNAS 115:9163–68
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hansen LP, Sargent TJ. 2001. Robust control and model uncertainty. Am. Econ. Rev. 91:60–66
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hansen LP, Sargent TJ. 2008. Robustness Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  25. Hansen LP, Sargent TJ. 2015. Uncertainty Within Economic Models Singapore: World Sci.
  26. Hansen LP, Sargent TJ, Turmuhambetova G, Williams N 2006. Robust control and model misspecification. J. Econ. Theory 128:45–90
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kandel S, Stambaugh RF. 1996. On the predictability of stock returns: an asset-allocation perspective. J. Finance 51:385–424
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Keynes JM. 1932. 1930. Economic possibilities for our grandchildren. Essays in Persuasion JM Keynes 358–73 New York: Harcourt Brace
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kitamura Y, Otsu T, Evdokimov K 2013. Robustness, infinitesimal neighborhoods, and moment conditions. Econometrica 81:1185–201
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Klibanoff P, Marinacci M, Mukerji S 2005. A smooth model of decision making under uncertainty. Econometrica 73:1849–92
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Klibanoff P, Marinacci M, Mukerji S 2009. Recursive smooth ambiguity preferences. J. Econ. Theory 144:930–76
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Knox TA. 2003a. Learning how to invest when returns are uncertain PhD Thesis, Harvard Univ Cambridge, MA:
  33. Knox TA. 2003b. Foundations for learning how to invest when returns are uncertain Work. Pap., Univ. Chicago Chicago:
  34. Kreps DM, Porteus EL. 1978. Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice theory. Econometrica 46:185–200
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kreps DM, Porteus EL. 1979. Dynamic choice theory and dynamic programming. Econometrica 47:91–100
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Luenberger DG. 1969. Optimization by Vector Space Methods New York: Wiley
  37. Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Rustichini A 2006a. Ambiguity aversion, robustness, and the variational representation of preferences. Econometrica 74:1447–98
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Maccheroni F, Marinacci M, Rustichini A 2006b. Dynamic variational preferences. J. Econ. Theory 128:4–44
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Machina MJ. 1989. Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty. J. Econ. Lit. 27:1622–68
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Machina MJ, Schmeidler D. 1992. A more robust definition of subjective probability. Econometrica 60:745–80
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Maenhout PJ. 2004. Robust portfolio rules and asset pricing. Rev. Financ. Stud. 17:951–83
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Maenhout PJ. 2006. Robust portfolio rules and detection-error probabilities for a mean-reverting risk premium. J. Econ. Theory 128:136–63
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Manski CF. 2004. Statistical treatment rules for heterogeneous populations. Econometrica 72:1221–46
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Newey WK, Smith RJ. 2004. Higher order properties of GMM and generalized empirical likelihood estimators. Econometrica 72:219–55
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Pástor L, Stambaugh RF. 2009. Predictive systems: living with imperfect predictors. J. Finance 64:1583–628
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Pástor L, Stambaugh RF. 2012. Are stocks really less volatile in the long run. J. Finance 67:431–77
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Ramsey FP. 1931. 1926. Truth and probability. The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays RB Braithwaite 156–98 London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Samuelson PA. 1969. Lifetime portfolio selection by dynamic stochastic programming. Rev. Econ. Stat. 51:239–46
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Savage LJ. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics New York: Wiley
  50. Siegel JJ. 1992. The real rate of interest from 1800–1990: a study of the U.S. and the U.K. J. Monet. Econ. 29:227–52
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Siegel JJ. 2008. Stocks for the Long Run New York: McGraw Hill
  52. Sims CA. 1988. Bayesian skepticism on unit root econometrics. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 12:463–74
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sims CA. 2001. Pitfalls of a minimax approach to model uncertainty. Am. Econ. Rev. 91:51–54
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Sims CA, Uhlig H. 1991. Understanding unit rooters: a helicopter tour. Econometrica 59:1591–99
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Stambaugh RF. 1999. Predictive regressions. J. Financ. Econ. 54:375–421
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Stoye J. 2009. Minimax regret treatment choice with finite samples. J. Econom. 151:70–81
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Stoye J. 2012. New perspectives on statistical decisions under ambiguity. Annu. Rev. Econ. 4:257–82
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Strzalecki T. 2011. Axiomatic foundations for multiplier preferences. Econometrica 79:47–73
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Strzalecki T. 2013. Temporal resolution of uncertainty and recursive models of ambiguity aversion. Econometrica 81:1039–74
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Watson J, Holmes C. 2016. Approximate models and robust decisions. Stat. Sci. 31:465–89
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Weil P. 1989. The equity premium puzzle and the risk-free rate puzzle. J. Monet. Econ. 24:401–21
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Xia Y. 2001. Learning about predictability: the effects of parameter uncertainty on dynamic asset allocation. J. Finance 56:205–46
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-042544
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-042544
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error