1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  4. Volume 47, 2022
  5. Article

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volume 47, 2022

The Role of Nature-Based Solutions in Supporting Social-Ecological Resilience for Climate Change Adaptation

Abstract

Social-ecological systems underpinning nature-based solutions (NbS) must be resilient to changing conditions if NbS are to contribute to long-term climate change adaptation. We develop a two-part conceptual framework linking social-ecological resilience to adaptation outcomes in NbS. Part one determines the potential of NbS to support resilience based on assessing whether NbS affect key mechanisms known to enable resilience. Examples include social-ecological diversity, connectivity, and inclusive decision-making. Part two includes adaptation outcomes that building social-ecological resilience can sustain, known as nature's contributions toadaptation (NCAs). We apply the framework to a global dataset of NbS in forests. We find evidence that NbS may be supporting resilience by influencing many enabling mechanisms. NbS also deliver many NCAs such as flood and drought mitigation. However, there is less evidence for some mechanisms and NCAs critical for resilience to long-term uncertainty. We present future research questions to better understand how NbS can continue to support social-ecological systems in a changing world.

Keyword(s): climate change adaptation, forests, nature's contributions to adaptation, nature-based solutions, resilience, social-ecological systems
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-010017
2022-10-17
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/energy/47/1/annurev-environ-012220-010017.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-010017&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C et al., eds. 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  2. 2.
    Seddon N, Chausson A, Berry P, Girardin CAJ, Smith A, Turner B. 2020. Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 375:20190120
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.
    Cohen-Shacham E, Andrade A, Dalton J, Dudley N, Jones M et al. 2019. Core principles for successfully implementing and upscaling Nature-based Solutions. Environ. Sci. Policy. 98:20–29
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.
    Seddon N. 2022. Harnessing the potential of nature-based solutions for mitigating and adapting to climate change. Science 376:66001410–16
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.
    Seddon N, Smith A, Smith P, Key I, Chausson A et al. 2021. Getting the message right on nature-based solutions to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 27:81518–46
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.
    Chausson A, Turner B, Seddon D, Chabaneix N, Girardin CAJ et al. 2020. Mapping the effectiveness of nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation. Glob. Change Biol. 26:116134–55
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 7.
    Sudmeier-Rieux K, Arce-Mojica T, Boehmer HJ, Doswald N, Emerton L et al. 2021. Scientific evidence for ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction. Nat. Sustain. 4:803–10
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 8.
    Woroniecki S, Spiegelenberg FA, Chausson A, Turner B, Key I et al. 2022. Contributions of nature-based solutions to reducing people's vulnerabilities to climate change across the rural Global South. Clim. Dev. In press
  9. 9.
    Smith AC, Tasnim T, Irfanullah H, Turner B, Chausson A, Seddon A. 2021. Nature-based solutions in Bangladesh: evidence of effectiveness for addressing climate change and other sustainable development goals. Front. Environ. Sci. 9:737659
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 10.
    Bruley E, Locatelli B, Colloff MJ, Salliou N, Thibault M, Lavorel S. 2021. Actions and leverage points for ecosystem-based adaptation pathways in the Alps. Environ. Sci. Policy. 124:567–79
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 11.
    Schipper ELF. 2020. Primer maladaptation: when adaptation to climate change goes very wrong. One Earth 3:409–14
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 12.
    Engle NL, de Bremond A, Malone EL, Moss RH. 2014. Towards a resilience indicator framework for making climate-change adaptation decisions. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 19:1295–1312
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 13.
    Yousefpour R, Hanewinkel M. 2016. Climate change and decision-making under uncertainty. Curr. For. Rep. 2:143–49
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 14.
    Singh C, Iyer S, New MG, Few R, Kuchimanchi B et al. 2021. Interrogating ‘effectiveness’ in climate change adaptation: 11 guiding principles for adaptation research and practice. Clim. Dev. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2021.1964937
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. 15.
    Nelson DR, Adger WN, Brown K 2007. Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 32:395–419
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 16.
    Galappaththi EK, Ford JD, Bennett EM. 2019. A framework for assessing community adaptation to climate change in a fisheries context. Environ. Sci. Policy. 92:17–26
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 17.
    Folke C. 2016. Resilience (republished). Ecol. Soc. 21:444
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 18.
    Nelson DR. 2011. Adaptation and resilience: responding to a changing climate. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 2:1113–20
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 19.
    Andersson E, Borgström S, Mcphearson T 2017. Double insurance in dealing with extremes: ecological and social factors for making nature-based solutions last. Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas: Linkages Between Science, Policy, and Practice N Kabisch, H Korn, J Stadler, A Bonn 51–64 Cham, Switz: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 20.
    Palomo I, Locatelli B, Otero I, Colloff M, Crouzat E et al. 2021. Assessing nature-based solutions for transformative change. One Earth 4:730–41
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 21.
    Tzoulas K, Galan J, Venn S, Dennis M, Pedroli B et al. 2021. A conceptual model of the social–ecological system of nature-based solutions in urban environments. Ambio 50:2335–45
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 22.
    Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J. 2010. Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol. Soc. 15:420
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 23.
    Biggs R, Schlüter M, Biggs D, Bohensky EL, BurnSilver S et al. 2012. Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37:421–48
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 24.
    Weise H, Auge H, Baessler C, Bärlund I, Bennett EM et al. 2020. Resilience trinity: safeguarding ecosystem functioning and services across three different time horizons and decision contexts. Oikos 129:445–56
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 25.
    Biggs R, Schlüter M, Schoon ML, eds. 2015. Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  26. 26.
    Lavorel S, Colloff MJ, Mcintyre S, Doherty MD, Murphy HT et al. 2015. Ecological mechanisms underpinning climate adaptation services. Glob. Change Biol. 21:12–31
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 27.
    Colloff MJ, Wise RM, Palomo I, Lavorel S, Pascual U. 2020. Nature's contribution to adaptation: insights from examples of the transformation of social-ecological systems. Ecosyst. People 16:1137–50
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 28.
    Thiault L, Jupiter SD, Johnson JE, Cinner JE, Jarvis RM et al. 2021. Harnessing the potential of vulnerability assessments for managing social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 26:21
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 29.
    Key I, Smith A, Turner B, Chausson A, Girardin C et al. 2022. Biodiversity outcomes of nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation: characterising the evidence base.. Front. Environ. Sci. In press
  30. 30.
    Hajjar R, Engbring G, Kornhauser K. 2021. The impacts of REDD+ on the social-ecological resilience of community forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 16:024001
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 31.
    Lavorel S, Locatelli B, Colloff MJ, Bruley E. 2020. Co-producing ecosystem services for adapting to climate change. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 375:20190119
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 32.
    Lavorel S, Colloff MJ, Locatelli B, Gorddard R, Prober SM et al. 2019. Mustering the power of ecosystems for adaptation to climate change. Environ. Sci. Policy. 92:87–97
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 33.
    Welden EA, Chausson A, Melanidis MS. 2021. Leveraging Nature-based Solutions for transformation: reconnecting people and nature. People Nat 3:5966–77
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 34.
    Calliari E, Staccione A, Mysiak J. 2019. An assessment framework for climate-proof nature-based solutions. Sci. Total Environ. 656:691–700
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 35.
    Comberti C, Thornton TF, de Echeverria VW, Patterson T. 2015. Ecosystem services or services to ecosystems? Valuing cultivation and reciprocal relationships between humans and ecosystems. Glob. Environ. Change 34:247–62
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 36.
    Ford JD, King N, Galappaththi EK, Pearce T, McDowell G, Harper SL. 2020. The resilience of indigenous peoples to environmental change. One Earth 2:6532–43
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 37.
    Dickson-Hoyle S, Ignace RE, Ignace MB, Hagerman SM, Daniels LD, Copes-Gerbitz K. 2021. Walking on two legs: a pathway of Indigenous restoration and reconciliation in fire-adapted landscapes. Restor. Ecol. 30:4e13566
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 38.
    Armstrong CG, Miller JED, McAlvay AC, Ritchie PM, Lepofsky D. 2021. Historical indigenous land-use explains plant functional trait diversity. Ecol. Soc. 26:26
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 39.
    Messier C, Bauhus J, Doyon F, Maure F, Sousa-Silva R et al. 2019. The functional complex network approach to foster forest resilience to global changes. For. Ecosyst. 6:21
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 40.
    Carpenter S, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel N 2001. From metaphor to measure: Resilience of what to what?. Ecosystems 4:8765–81
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 41.
    Cote M, Nightingale AJ. 2012. Resilience thinking meets social theory: situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 36:4475–89
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 42.
    Meerow S, Pajouhesh P, Miller TR. 2019. Social equity in urban resilience planning. Local Environ 24:9793–808
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 43.
    Matin N, Forrester J, Ensor J. 2018. What is equitable resilience?. World Dev 109:197–205
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 44.
    Garcia A, Gonda N, Atkins E, Godden NJ, Henrique KP et al. 2022. Power in resilience and resilience's power in climate change scholarship. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 13:3e762
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 45.
    Akamani K. 2012. A community resilience model for understanding and assessing the sustainability of forest-dependent communities. Res. Hum. Ecol. 19:299–109
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 46.
    Jordan JC. 2018. Deconstructing resilience: why gender and power matter in responding to climate stress in Bangladesh. Clim. Dev. 11:2167–79
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 47.
    Walker BH. 2020. Resilience: what it is and is not. Ecol. Soc. 25:225–27
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 48.
    Folke C, Haider LJ, Lade SJ, Norström AV, Rocha J. 2021. Commentary: Resilience and social-ecological systems: a handful of frontiers. Glob. Environ. Change 71:102400
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 49.
    Béné C, Wood RG, Newsham A, Davies M. 2012. Resilience: New utopia or new tyranny? Reflection about the potentials and limits of the concept of resilience in relation to vulnerability reduction programmes. IDS Work. Pap. 2012:4051–61
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 50.
    Quinlan AE, Berbés-Blázquez M, Haider LJ, Peterson GD. 2016. Measuring and assessing resilience: broadening understanding through multiple disciplinary perspectives. J. Appl. Ecol. 53:677–87
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 51.
    Oliver TH, Heard MS, Isaac NJB, Roy DB, Procter D et al. 2015. Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30:11673–84
     [Google Scholar]
  52. 52.
    Barron J, Skyllerstedt S, Giordano M, Adimassu Z. 2021. Building climate resilience in rainfed landscapes needs more than good will. Front. Clim. 3:735880
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 53.
    Pahl-Wostl C. 2009. A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob. Environ. Change 19:3354–65
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 54.
    Chaffin BC, Gosnell H, Cosens BA. 2014. A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: synthesis and future directions. Ecol. Soc. 19:356
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 55.
    Cinner JE, Adger WN, Allison EH, Barnes ML, Brown K et al. 2018. Building adaptive capacity to climate change in tropical coastal communities. Nat. Clim. Change 8:117–23
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 56.
    Tidball KG, Metcalf S, Bain M, Elmqvist T. 2018. Community-led reforestation: cultivating the potential of virtuous cycles to confer resilience in disaster disrupted social–ecological systems. Sustain. Sci. 13:3797–813
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 57.
    Roe D, Turner B, Chausson A, Hemmerle E, Seddon N. 2021. Investing in nature for development: Do nature-based interventions deliver local development outcomes? Rep. Int. Inst. Environ. Dev. London:
  58. 58.
    Allen CR, Fontaine JJ, Pope KL, Garmestani AS. 2011. Adaptive management for a turbulent future. J. Environ. Manag 92:51339–45
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 59.
    Bahadur AV, Ibrahim M, Tanner T 2013. Characterising resilience: unpacking the concept for tackling climate change and development. Clim. Dev. 5:155–65
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 60.
    Johnstone JF, Allen CD, Franklin JF, Frelich LE, Harvey BJ. 2016. Changing disturbance regimes, ecological memory, and forest resilience. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14:7369–78
     [Google Scholar]
  61. 61.
    Brown K, Westaway E. 2011. Agency, capacity, and resilience to environmental change: lessons from human development, well-being, and disasters. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 36:321–42
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 62.
    Wagner S, Nocentini S, Huth F, Hoogstra-Klein M. 2014. Forest management approaches for coping with the uncertainty of climate change: trade-offs in service provisioning and adaptability. Ecol. Soc. 19:132
     [Google Scholar]
  63. 63.
    Messier C, Puettmann K, Chazdon R, Andersson KP, Angers VA et al. 2015. From management to stewardship: viewing forests as complex adaptive systems in an uncertain world. Conserv. Biol. 8:368–77
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 64.
    Elmqvist T, Folke C, Nyström M, Peterson G, Bengtsson J et al. 2003. Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1:9488–94
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 65.
    Craven D, Filotas E, Angers VA, Messier C. 2016. Evaluating resilience of tree communities in fragmented landscapes: linking functional response diversity with landscape connectivity. Biodivers. Res. 22:505–18
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 66.
    Aquilué N, Filotas E, Craven D, Fortin M-J, Brotons L, Messier C. 2020. Evaluating forest resilience to global threats using functional response traits and network properties. Ecol. Appl. 30:5e02095
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 67.
    Aquilué N, Messier C, Martins KT, Dumais-Lalonde V, Mina M 2021. Forest ecology and management: a simple-to-use management approach to boost adaptive capacity of forests to global uncertainty. For. Ecol. Manag. 481:118692
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 68.
    Seidl R, Lexer MJ. 2013. Forest management under climatic and social uncertainty: trade-offs between reducing climate change impacts and fostering adaptive capacity. J. Environ. Manag. 114:461–69
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 69.
    Vilà-Cabrera A, Coll L, Martínez-Vilalta J, Retana J. 2017. Forest management for adaptation to climate change in the Mediterranean basin: a synthesis of evidence. For. Ecol. Manag. 407:16–22
     [Google Scholar]
  70. 70.
    Devisscher T, Spies J, Griess VC. 2021. Time for change: learning from community forests to enhance the resilience of multi-value forestry in British Columbia, Canada. Land Use Policy 103:105317
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 71.
    Sapkota P, Keenan RJ, Ojha HR. 2019. Co-evolving dynamics in the social-ecological system of community forestry—prospects for ecosystem-based adaptation in the Middle Hills of Nepal. Reg. Environ. Change 19:179–92
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 72.
    Allen CR, Angeler DG, Cumming GS, Folke C, Twidwell D, Uden DR. 2016. Quantifying spatial resilience. J. Appl. Ecol. 53:625–35
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 73.
    Carpenter SR, Arrow KJ, Barrett S, Biggs R, Brock WA et al. 2012. General resilience to cope with extreme events. Sustainability 4:3248–59
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 74.
    Tompkins EL, Adger WN 2004. Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change?. Ecol. Soc. 9:210
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 75.
    Biggs R, Westley FR, Carpenter SR. 2010. Navigating the back loop: fostering social innovation and transformation in ecosystem management. Ecol. Soc. 15:29
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 76.
    Berkes F. 2007. Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking. Nat. Hazards 41:2283–95
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 77.
    Berkes F, Ross H. 2013. Community resilience: toward an integrated approach. Soc. Nat. Resour. 26:15–20
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 78.
    Pandey SS, Cockfield G, Maraseni TN. 2016. Assessing the roles of community forestry in climate change mitigation and adaptation: a case study from Nepal. For. Ecol. Manag 360:400–407
     [Google Scholar]
  79. 79.
    Brown DR, Dettmann P. 2011. Poverty alleviation and environmental restoration using the clean development mechanism: a case study from Humbo, Ethiopia. Environ. Manag 48:322–33
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 80.
    Eriksen S, Schipper ELF, Scoville-Simonds M, Vincent K, Adam HN et al. 2021. Adaptation interventions and their effect on vulnerability in developing countries: Help, hindrance or irrelevance?. World Dev 141:105383
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 81.
    Lin T, Htun KT, Gritten D, Martin AR. 2019. The contribution of community forestry to climate change adaptive capacity in tropical dry forests: lessons from Myanmar. Int. For. Rev. 21:3324–40
     [Google Scholar]
  82. 82.
    Hajjar R, Oldekop JA, Cronkleton P, Newton P, Russell AJM, Zhou W. 2021. A global analysis of the social and environmental outcomes of community forests. Nat. Sustain. 4:216–24
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 83.
    Wood BT, Quinn CH, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ. 2017. Investigating climate compatible development outcomes and their implications for distributive justice: evidence from Malawi. Environ. Manag. 60:436–53
     [Google Scholar]
  84. 84.
    Osborne T, Brock S, Chazdon R, Chomba S, Garen E et al. 2021. The political ecology playbook for ecosystem restoration: principles for effective, equitable, and transformative landscapes. Glob. Environ. Change 70:102320
     [Google Scholar]
  85. 85.
    Enfors-Kautsky E, Järnberg L, Quinlan A, Ryan P 2021. Wayfinder: a new generation of resilience practice. Ecol. Soc. 26:239
     [Google Scholar]
  86. 86.
    Chapin FS III, Carpenter SR, Kofinas GP, Folke C, Abel N et al. 2009. Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25:4241–49
     [Google Scholar]
  87. 87.
    Zafra-Calvo N, Balvanera P, Pascual U, Merçon J, Martín-López B et al. 2020. Plural valuation of nature for equity and sustainability: insights from the Global South. Glob. Environ. Change 63:102115
     [Google Scholar]
  88. 88.
    Strauch AM, Rurai MT, Almedom AM. 2016. Influence of forest management systems on natural resource use and provision of ecosystem services in Tanzania. J. Environ. Manag. 180:35–44
     [Google Scholar]
  89. 89.
    Reed G, Brunet ND, McGregor D, Scurr C, Sadik T et al. 2022. Toward Indigenous visions of nature-based solutions: an exploration into Canadian federal climate policy. Clim. Policy 22:4514–33
     [Google Scholar]
  90. 90.
    McMillen H, Ticktin T, Kihalani S. 2017. The future is behind us: traditional ecological knowledge and resilience over time on Hawai‘i Island. Reg. Environ. Change 17:2579–92
     [Google Scholar]
  91. 91.
    Armitage D, Berkes F, Dale A, Kocho-Schellenberg E, Patton E. 2011. Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic. Glob. Environ. Change 21:3995–1004
     [Google Scholar]
  92. 92.
    Sterling EJ, Filardi C, Toomey A, Sigouin A, Betley A et al. 2017. Biocultural approaches to well-being and sustainability indicators across scales. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1:1798–1806
     [Google Scholar]
  93. 93.
    Dawson NM, Coolsaet B, Sterling EJ, Loveridge R, Gross-Camp ND et al. 2021. The role of Indigenous peoples and local communities in effective and equitable conservation. Ecol. Soc. 26:319
     [Google Scholar]
  94. 94.
    Woroniecki S, Wendo H, Brink E, Islar M, Krause T et al. 2020. Nature unsettled: How knowledge and power shape ‘nature-based’ approaches to societal challenges. Glob. Environ. Change 65:102132
     [Google Scholar]
  95. 95.
    Lunga W, Musarurwa C. 2016. Exploiting indigenous knowledge commonwealth to mitigate disasters: from the archives of vulnerable communities in Zimbabwe. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 15:122–29
     [Google Scholar]
  96. 96.
    Copes-Gerbitz K, Hagerman SM, Daniels LD. 2021. Situating Indigenous knowledge for resilience in fire-dependent social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 26:425
     [Google Scholar]
  97. 97.
    Preiser R, Biggs R, De Vos A, Folke C. 2018. Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: organizing principles for advancing research methods and approaches. Ecol. Soc. 23:446
     [Google Scholar]
  98. 98.
    Marquardt K, Salomonsson L, Brondizio E. 2010. Small-scale farmers’ land management strategies in the upper Amazon: an action research case study. Interciencia 35:421–29
     [Google Scholar]
  99. 99.
    Nansikombi H, Fischer R, Kabwe G, Günter S. 2020. Exploring patterns of forest governance quality: insights from forest frontier communities in Zambia's Miombo ecoregion. Land Use Policy 99:104866
     [Google Scholar]
  100. 100.
    Makrickiene E, Brukas V, Brodrechtova Y, Mozgeris G, Sedmák R, Šálka J. 2019. From command-and-control to good forest governance: a critical interpretive analysis of Lithuania and Slovakia. For. Policy Econ 109:102024
     [Google Scholar]
  101. 101.
    Abrams J, Huber-Stearns H, Michelle S-A, Davis EJ, Bone C et al. 2021. Adaptive governance in a complex social‑ecological context: emergent responses to a native forest insect outbreak. Sustain. Sci. 16:53–68
     [Google Scholar]
  102. 102.
    del Campo AD, Fernandes TJG, Molina AJ. 2014. Hydrology-oriented (adaptive) silviculture in a semiarid pine plantation: How much can be modified the water cycle through forest management?. Eur. J. For. Res. 133:5879–94
     [Google Scholar]
  103. 103.
    Pramova E, Locatelli B, Djoudi H, Somorin OA. 2012. Forests and trees for social adaptation to climate variability and change. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 3:6581–96
     [Google Scholar]
  104. 104.
    Kelly CN, McGuire KJ, Miniat CF, Vose J. 2016. Streamflow response to increasing precipitation extremes altered by forest management. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43:3727–36
     [Google Scholar]
  105. 105.
    Seidl R, Spies TA, Peterson DL, Stephens SL, Hicke JA. 2016. Searching for resilience: addressing the impacts of changing disturbance regimes on forest ecosystem services. J. Appl. Ecol. 53:1120–29
     [Google Scholar]
  106. 106.
    Galafassi D, Daw TM, Munyi L, Brown K, Barnaud C, Fazey I. 2017. Learning about social-ecological trade-offs. Ecol. Soc. 22:12
     [Google Scholar]
  107. 107.
    Sterling E, Ticktin T, Morgan TKK, Cullman G, Alvira D et al. 2017. Culturally grounded indicators of resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ. Soc. Adv. Res. 8:163–95
     [Google Scholar]
  108. 108.
    Abdel C, Baba K, Hack J. 2019. Economic valuation of ecosystem services for the sustainable management of agropastoral dams. A case study of the Sakabansi dam, northern Benin. Ecol. Indic. 107:105648
     [Google Scholar]
  109. 109.
    Biggs R, de Vos A, Preiser R, Clements H, Maciejewski K, Schlüter M, eds. 2021. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods for Social-Ecological Systems London: Routledge
  110. 110.
    No'kmaq M, Marshall A, Beazley KF, Hum J, joudry s, et al. 2021. “Awakening the sleeping giant”: re-Indigenization principles for transforming biodiversity conservation in Canada and beyond. FACETS 6:839–69
     [Google Scholar]
  111. 111.
    Kimmerer RW. 2013. Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Ed.
  112. 112.
    Balvanera P, Calderón-Contreras R, Castro AJ, Felipe-Lucia M, Geijzendorffer IR et al. 2017. Interconnected place-based social–ecological research can inform global sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 29:1–7
     [Google Scholar]
  113. 113.
    Tseng Y-P, Huang Y-C, Li M-S, Jiang Y-Z. 2022. Selecting key resilience indicators for Indigenous community using Fuzzy Delphi Method. Sustainability 14:42018
     [Google Scholar]
  114. 114.
    Colloff MJ, Gorddard R, Abel N, Locatelli B, Wyborn C et al. 2021. Adapting transformation and transforming adaptation to climate change using a pathways approach. 124163–74
  115. 115.
    Li T, Dong Y, Liu Z. 2020. A review of social-ecological system resilience: mechanism, assessment and management. Sci. Total Environ. 723:135138113
     [Google Scholar]
  116. 116.
    Pascual U, Balvanera P, Díaz S, Pataki G, Roth E et al. 2017. Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.26–277–16
     [Google Scholar]
  117. 117.
    Palomo I, Felipe-Lucia MR, Bennett EM, Martín-López B, Pascual U. 2016. Disentangling the pathways and effects of ecosystem service. Adv. Ecol. Res. 54:245–83
     [Google Scholar]
  118. 118.
    Timpane-Padgham BL, Beechie T, Klinger T. 2017. A systematic review of ecological attributes that confer resilience to climate change in environmental restoration. PLOS ONE 12:3e0173812
     [Google Scholar]
  119. 119.
    Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J. 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 30:441–73
     [Google Scholar]
  120. 120.
    Fedele G, Locatelli B, Djoudi H. 2017. Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience. Ecosyst. Serv. 28:43–54
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-010017
Loading
The Role of Nature-Based Solutions in Supporting Social-Ecological Resilience for Climate Change Adaptation
Annual Review of Environment and Resources 47, 123 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-010017
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-010017
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-010017
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Data

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error