Discounting and Global Environmental Change

Literature Cited

1. 1. 

   IPCC (Intergov. Panel Clim. Change) 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Geneva: IPCC
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2. 

   IPBES (Intergov. Sci.-Policy Platf. Biodivers. Ecosyst. Serv.) 2019. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Bonn, Ger.: IPBES
3. 3. 

   Maddison A. 2003. The World Economy: Historical Statistics, Vol. 2 Paris: Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev.
4. 4. 

   World Bank 2020. GDP (constant 2010 US$). World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD
5. 5. 

   Weitzman ML. 2001. Gamma discounting. Am. Econ. Rev. 91:260–71
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6. 

   Weitzman ML. 1998. Why the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 36:201–8
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7. 

   O'Donoghue T, Rabin M. 1999. Doing it now or later. Am. Econ. Rev. 89:103–24
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8. 

   Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O'Donoghue T. 2002. Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. J. Econ. Lit. 40:351–401
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9. 

   Koopmans TC. 1960. Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28:287–309
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10. 

    Gollier C. 2013. Pricing the Planet's Future: The Economics of Discounting in an Uncertain World Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press
11. 11. 

    Lind RC, Arrow KJ, Corey GR, Dasgupta P, Sen AK et al. 1982. Discounting for Time and Risk in Energy Policy Baltimore: Resour. Future
12. 12. 

    Portney PR, Weyant JP. 1999. Discounting and Intergenerational Equity New York: Resour. Future
13. 13. 

    Ramsey FP. 1928. A mathematical theory of savings. Econ. J. 38:543–59
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14. 

    Rae J 1834. The Sociological Theory of Capital London: Macmillan
15. 15. 

    Böhm-Bawerk EV. 1889. Capital and Interest: A Critical History of Economic Theory New York: Bretano's
16. 16. 

    Fisher I. 1930. The Theory of Interest: As Determined by Impatience to Spend Income and Opportunity to Invest It New York: Macmillan
17. 17. 

    Samuelson PA. 1937. A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econ. Stud. 4:155–61
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18. 

    Drupp MA, Freeman MC, Groom B, Nesje F. 2018. Discounting disentangled. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 10:109–34
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19. 

    Groom B, Maddison D. 2019. New estimates of the elasticity of marginal utility for the UK. Environ. Resour. Econ. 72:1155–82
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20. 

    Heal G. 2009. The economics of climate change: a post-stern perspective. Clim. Change 96:275–97
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21. 

    Dasgupta P, Mäler K-G, Barrett S 1999. Intergenerational equity, social discount rates and global warming. Discounting and Intergenerational Equity PR Portney, JP Weyant 51–77 Washington, DC: Resour. Future
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22. 

    Arrow K, Dasgupta P, Goulder L, Daily G, Ehrlich P et al. 2004. Are we consuming too much?. J. Econ. Perspect. 18:147–72
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23. 

    Polasky S, Bryant B, Hawthorne P, Johnson J, Keeler B, Pennington D. 2015. Inclusive wealth as a metric of sustainable development. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 40:445–66
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24. 

    Arrow KJ, Dasgupta P, Goulder LH, Mumford KJ, Oleson K. 2012. Sustainability and the measurement of wealth. Environ. Dev. Econ. 17:317–53
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25. 

    Clark CW. 2010. Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Mathematics of Conservation Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, , 3rd ed..
26. 26. 

    Clark CW. 1973. Profit maximization and the extinction of animal species. J. Polit. Econ. 81:950–61
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27. 

    Pielke RAJ. 2007. The case for a sustainable climate policy: why costs and benefits must be temporally balanced. Univ. PA Law Rev. 155:1843–57
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28. 

    Murphy RP. 2009. Rolling the DICE: William Nordhaus's dubious case for a carbon tax. Indep. Rev. 14:197–217
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29. 

    Nordhaus WD. 2013. The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
30. 30. 

    Sharpe WF. 1964. Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J. Finance XIX:425–42
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31. 

    Gollier C. 2004. Maximizing the expected net future value as an alternative strategy to gamma discounting. Financ. Res. Lett. 1:85–89
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32. 

    Gollier C, Weitzman ML. 2010. How should the distant future be discounted when discount rates are uncertain?. Econ. Lett. 107:350–53
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33. 

    Samuelson PA. 1958. An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. J. Polit. Econ. 66:467–82
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34. 

    Diamond PA. 1965. National debt in a neoclassical growth model. Am. Econ. Rev. 55:1126–50
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35. 

    Howarth RB. 1998. An overlapping generations model of climate-economy interactions. Scand. J. Econ. 100:575–91
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36. 

    Schneider MT, Traeger CP, Winkler R. 2012. Trading off generations: equity, discounting, and climate change. Eur. Econ. Rev. 56:1621–44
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37. 

    Aiyagari SR. 1985. Observational equivalence of the overlapping generations and the discounted dynamic programming frameworks for one-sector growth. J. Econ. Theory 35:201–21
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38. 

    Baumol WJ. 1968. On the social rate of discount. Am. Econ. Rev. 58:788–802
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39. 

    Bradford DF. 1975. Constraints on government investment opportunities and the choice of discount rate. Am. Econ. Rev. 65:887–99
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40. 

    Krutilla JV. 1967. Conservation reconsidered. Am. Econ. Rev. 57:777–86
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41. 

    Krutilla JV, Fisher AC. 1975. The Economics of Natural Resources Baltimore: Resour. Future
42. 42. 

    Fisher AC, Krutilla JV. 1975. Resource conservation, environmental preservation, and the rate of discount. Q. J. Econ. 89:358–70
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43. 

    Baumgärtner S, Klein AM, Thiel D, Winkler K. 2015. Ramsey discounting of ecosystem services. Environ. Resour. Econ. 61:273–96
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44. 

    Hoel M, Sterner T. 2007. Discounting and relative prices. Clim. Change 84:265–80
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45. 

    Sterner T, Kyriakopoulou E. 2012. The economics of) discounting: unbalanced growth, uncertainty, and spatial considerations. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 4:285–301
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46. 

    Gerlagh R, Van der Zwaan BCC. 2002. Long-term substitutability between environmental and man-made goods. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 44:329–45
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47. 

    Sterner T, Persson UM. 2008. An even sterner review: introducing relative prices into the discounting debate. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2:61–76
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48. 

    Kula E, Evans D. 2011. Dual discounting in cost-benefit analysis for environmental impacts. Environ. Impact. Assess. Rev. 31:180–86
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49. 

    Gollier C. 2010. Ecological discounting. J. Econ. Theory 145:812–29
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50. 

    Weikard HP, Zhu X. 2005. Discounting and environmental quality: When should dual rates be used?. Econ. Model. 22:868–78
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51. 

    Traeger CP. 2011. Sustainability, limited substitutability, and non-constant social discount rates. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 62:215–28
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52. 

    Neumayer E. 1999. Global warming: Discounting is not the issue, but substitutability is. Energy Policy 27:33–43
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53. 

    Thaler R. 1981. Some empirical evidence of dynamic inconsistency. Econ. Lett. 8:201–7
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54. 

    Benzion U, Rapoport A, Yagil J. 1989. Discount rates inferred from decisions: an experimental study. Manag. Sci. 35:270–84
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55. 

    Loewenstein G, Prelec D. 1992. Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. Q. J. Econ. 107:574–97
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56. 

    Dellavigna S. 2009. Psychology and economics: evidence from the field. J. Econ. Lit. 47:315–72
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57. 

    Hepburn C, Duncan S, Papachristodoulou A. 2010. Behavioural economics, hyperbolic discounting and environmental policy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 46:189–206
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58. 

    Strotz RH. 1956. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econ. Stud. 23:165–80
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59. 

    Laibson D. 1997. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q. J. Econ. 112:443–77
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60. 

    Rubinstein A. 2003.. “ Economics and psychology. ”? The case of hyperbolic discounting. Int. Econ. Rev. 44:1207–16
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61. 

    Read D. 2001. Is time-discounting hyperbolic or subadditive?. J. Risk Uncertain 23:5–32
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62. 

    Gowdy J, Rosser JB, Roy L. 2013. The evolution of hyperbolic discounting: implications for truly social valuation of the future. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 90:S94–104
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63. 

    Phelps ES, Pollak RA. 1968. On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. Rev. Econ. Stud. 35:185–99
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64. 

    Almansa C, Martínez-Paz JM. 2011. Intergenerational equity and dual discounting. Environ. Dev. Econ. 16:685–707
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65. 

    Chapman GB. 1996. Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 22:771–91
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66. 

    Kirby KN. 1997. Bidding on the future: evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 126:54–70
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67. 

    Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–92
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68. 

    Loewenstein G. 1987. Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption. Econ. J. 97:666–84
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69. 

    Loewenstein GF. 1988. Frames of mind in intertemporal choice. Manag. Sci. 34:200–14
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70. 

    Weatherly JN, Terrell HK. 2011. Delay discounting of different commodities II: Confirmatory analyses. J. Gen. Psychol. 138:35–48
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71. 

    Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. 1990. Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J. Polit. Econ. 98:1325–48
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72. 

    Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. 1991. The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econ. Perspect. 5:193–206
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73. 

    Elster J, Loewenstein G 1992. Utility from memory and anticipation. Choice Over Time J Lowenstein, J Elster 213–34 New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74. 

    Arrow K, Cropper M, Gollier C, Groom B, Heal G et al. 2013. Determining benefits and costs for future generations. Science 341:349–50
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75. 

    Arrow KJ, Cropper ML, Gollier C, Groom B, Heal GM et al. 2014. Should governments use a declining discount rate in project analysis?. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 8:145–63
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76. 

    Newell RG, Pizer WA. 2003. Discounting the distant future: How much do uncertain rates increase valuations?. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 46:52–71
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77. 

    Rawls J. 1971. A Theory of Justice Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
78. 78. 

    Arrow KJ, Cline WR, Mäler K-G, Munasinghe M, Squitieri R, Stiglitz JE. 1996. Intertemporal equity, discounting, and economic efficiency. Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change JP Bruce, H Lee, EF Haites 125–44 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79. 

    Tol RSJ. 2006. The Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change: a comment. Energy Environ 17:977–81
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80. 

    Nordhaus WD. 2007. A review of the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. J. Econ. Lit XLV:686–702
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81. 

    Nordhaus WD. 2008. A Question of Balance: Weighting the Options on Global Warming Policies New Haven, CT/London: Yale Univ. Press
82. 82. 

    Marglin SA. 1963. The social rate of discount and the optimal rate of investment. Q. J. Econ. 77:95–111
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83. 

    Broome J. 1992. Counting the Costs of Climate Change Cambridge, UK: White Horse Press
84. 84. 

    Beckerman W, Hepburn C. 2007. Ethics of the discount rate in the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. World Econ 8:187–210
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85. 

    Cline WR. 1992. The Economics of Global Warming Washington, DC: Inst. Int. Econ.
86. 86. 

    Davidson MD. 2015. Climate change and the ethics of discounting. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 6:401–12
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87. 

    Hepburn C, Stern N. 2008. A new global deal on climate change. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 24:259–79
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88. 

    Stern N. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
89. 89. 

    Stern N. 2008. The economics of climate change. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:1–37
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90. 

    Caney S. 2008. Human rights, climate change, and discounting. Env. Polit. 17:536–55
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91. 

    Cline WR. 2012. Intergenerational discounting and global economic policies Paper presented at the Conference on “Ethics and Globalization: Tradeoffs Behind Policy Choices ,” Peterson Inst. Int. Econ. Washington, DC: Jan. 7.
92. 92. 

    Dasgupta P. 2007. Commentary: The Stern Review's Economics of Climate Change. Natl. Inst. Econ. Rev. 199:4–7
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93. 

    Dasgupta P. 2008. Discounting climate change. J. Risk Uncertain 37:141–69
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94. 

    Davidson MD. 2014. Zero discounting can compensate future generations for climate damage. Ecol. Econ. 105:40–47
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95. 

    Harrod R. 1948. Towards a Dynamic Economics London: Macmillan
96. 96. 

    Koopmans T. 1963. On the concept of optimal economic growth Cowles Found. Discuss. Pap. 163, Yale Univ New Haven, CT:
97. 97. 

    Pearce D, Groom B, Hepburn C, Koundouri P. 2003. Valuing the future recent advances in social discounting. World Econ 4:2
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98. 

    Pigou AC. 1932. The Economics of Welfare London: Macmillan. , 4th ed..
99. 99. 

    Sen A 1982. Approaches to the choice of discount rates for social benefit-cost analysis. Discounting for Time and Risk in Energy Policy RC Lind, KJ Arrow, GR Corey, P Dasgupta, AK Sen et al.325–53 Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100. 

     Solow RM. 1974. Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Econ. Sustain. 41:45–61
     [Google Scholar]
101. 101. 

     Spash CL. 1993. Economics, ethics, and long-term environmental damages. Environ. Ethics 15:117–32
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102. 

     Stern N. 2014. Ethics, equity and the economics of climate change paper 1: science and philosophy. Econ. Philos. 30:397–444
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103. 

     Stern N. 2014. Ethics, equity and the economics of climate change paper 2: economics and philosophy. Econ. Philos. 30:445–501
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104. 

     Koopmans TC, Diamond PA, Williamson RE. 1964. Stationary utility and time perspective. Econometrica 32:82–100
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105. 

     Arrow KJ. 1999. Discounting, morality, and gaming. Discounting and Intergenerational Equity PR Portney, JP Weyent 13–21 Washington, DC: Resour. Future
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106. 

     Chichilnisky G, Hammond PJ, Stern N. 2020. Fundamental utilitarianism and intergenerational equity with extinction discounting. Soc. Choice Welfare 54:397–427
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107. 

     Alvaredo F, Chancel L, Piketty T, Saez E, Zuchman G. 2018. World Inequality Report 2018 Paris/Berkeley: World Inequal. Lab.
108. 108. 

     Hepburn C. 2010. Ethics and discounting global warming damages. Issues of the Day: 100 Commentaries on Climate, Energy, the Environment, Transportation, and Public Health Policy IWH Parry, F Day New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109. 

     Azar C, Sterner T. 1996. Discounting and distributional considerations in the context of global warming. Ecol. Econ. 19:169–84
     [Google Scholar]
110. 110. 

     Azar C. 1999. Weight factors in cost-benefit analysis of climate change. Environ. Resour. Econ. 13:249–68
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111. 

     Fankhauser S, Tol RSJ, Pearce DW. 1997. The aggregation of climate change damages: a welfare theoretic approach. Environ. Resour. Econ. 10:249–66
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112. 

     Anthoff D, Hepburn C, Tol RSJ. 2009. Equity weighting and the marginal damage costs of climate change. Ecol. Econ. 68:836–49
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113. 

     Anthoff D, Tol RSJ. 2010. On international equity weights and national decision making on climate change. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 60:14–20
     [Google Scholar]
114. 114. 

     Conceição P, Zhang Y. 2010. Article discounting in the context of climate change economics: the policy implications of uncertainty and global asymmetries. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 12:31–57
     [Google Scholar]
115. 115. 

     Asheim GB, Mitra T 2010. Sustainability and discounted utilitarianism in models of economic growth. Math. Soc. Sci. 59:148–69
     [Google Scholar]
116. 116. 

     Schelling TC. 1995. Intergenerational discounting. Energy Policy 23:395–401
     [Google Scholar]
117. 117. 

     Schelling TC. 2000. Intergenerational and international discounting. Risk Anal 20:833–38
     [Google Scholar]
118. 118. 

     World Comm. Environ. Dev 1987. Our Common Future New York: Oxford Univ. Press
119. 119. 

     Yamaguchi R. 2019. Intergenerational discounting with intragenerational inequality in consumption and the environment. Environ. Resour. Econ. 73:957–72
     [Google Scholar]
120. 120. 

     Caney S. 2014. Climate change, intergenerational equity and the social discount rate. Philos. Econ. 13:320–42
     [Google Scholar]
121. 121. 

     Spash CL. 1994. Double CO₂ and beyond: benefits, costs and compensation. Ecol. Econ. 10:27–36
     [Google Scholar]
122. 122. 

     Revesz RL. 1999. Environmental regulation, cost-benefit analysis, and the discounting of human lives. Columbia Law Rev 99:941–1017
     [Google Scholar]
123. 123. 

     Revesz RL, Shahabian MR. 2011. Climate change and future generations. S. CA Law Rev. 84:1097–163
     [Google Scholar]
124. 124. 

     Brown PG. 1998. Toward an economics of stewardship: the case of climate. Ecol. Econ. 26:11–21
     [Google Scholar]
125. 125. 

     Bottero M, Ferretti V, Mondini G. 2013. From the environmental debt to the environmental loan: trends and future challenges for intergenerational discounting. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 15:1623–44
     [Google Scholar]
126. 126. 

     Howarth RB. 2007. Towards an operational sustainability criterion. Ecol. Econ. 63:656–63
     [Google Scholar]
127. 127. 

     Nordhaus WD, Boyer J. 2000. Warming the World. Economic Models of Global Warming Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
128. 128. 

     Nordhaus WD. 1977. Strategies for the Control of Carbon Dioxide Cowles Found. Discuss. Pap. 443, Yale Univ. New Haven, CT:
129. 129. 

     IPCC (Intergov. Panel Clim. Change) 1990. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
130. 130. 

     Nordhaus WD. 1991. To slow or not to slow: the economics of the greenhouse effect. Econ. J. 101:920–37
     [Google Scholar]
131. 131. 

     Manne AS, Richels RG. 1992. Buying Greenhouse Gas Insurance: The Economic Costs of CO₂ Emissions Limits Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
132. 132. 

     Nordhaus WD. 1994. Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
133. 133. 

     Nordhaus WD. 2017. Revisiting the social cost of carbon italicPNAS 1141518–23
     [Google Scholar]
134. 134. 

     Garnaut R. 2008. The Garnaut Climate Change Review Melbourne: Cambridge Univ. Press
135. 135. 

     Weitzman ML. 2007. A review of The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. J. Econ. Lit XLV:703–24
     [Google Scholar]
136. 136. 

     Evans DJ, Sezer H. 2005. Social discount rates for member countries of the European Union. J. Econ. Stud. 32:47–59
     [Google Scholar]
137. 137. 

     European Commission 2015. Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects: Economic Appraisal Tool for Cohesion Policy 2014–2020 Luxembourg: Publ. Off. Eur. Union
138. 138. 

     Grijalva TC, Lusk JL, Shaw WD. 2014. Discounting the distant future: an experimental investigation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 59:39–63
     [Google Scholar]
139. 139. 

     Hope C. 2006. The marginal impact of CO₂ from PAGE2002: an integrated assessment model incorporating the IPCC's five reasons for concern. Integr. Assess. J. 6:19–56
     [Google Scholar]
140. 140. 

     Lebègue D, Hirtzman P, Baumstark L. 2005. Le Prix du Temps et la Decision Publique: Révision du Taux d'Actualisation Public Paris: Doc. Fr.
141. 141. 

     Tol RSJ. 2005. The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: an assessment of the uncertainties. Energy Policy 33:2064–74
     [Google Scholar]
142. 142. 

     Treasury UK 2003. The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government, Stationery Office London: UK Treas.
     [Google Scholar]
143. 143. 

     Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases 2016. Technical Support Document: Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12866 Washington, DC: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-12/documents/sc_co2_tsd_august_2016.pdf
144. 144. 

     OMB (US Off. Manag. Budget) 2003.. Circular A-4: Regulatory Analysis Washington, DC: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/omb/circulars_a004_a-4/
145. 145. 

     Kamien MI, Schwartz NL. 2012. Dynamic Optimization: The Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control in Economics and Management Mineola, NY: Dover Publ. , 2nd ed..