1932

Abstract

In times of devastating ecological crisis, where can we find a route map to collectively halt current trends of destruction? In this review, we examine feminist studies’ recent contributions to activism and theorizing regarding extraction, emerging ecologies, and multispecies justice. By bringing in salient research from the fields of feminist political ecology, ecofeminism, and decolonial/anticolonial feminisms, we point to the ways in which feminist thought and action has opened up spaces for recognizing, envisioning, and making life-affirming ecologies rather than extractive systems of destruction. We refer to the former as emergent and emancipatory ecologies, that is, ecologies always in the process of becoming and capable of defying and subverting oppression based on gender, race, ethnicity, class, sexuality, caste, ability, species and other forms of discrimination—and, thus, capable of protecting and defending life and living worlds.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-092246
2022-10-17
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/energy/47/1/annurev-environ-112320-092246.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-092246&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Rocheleau D, Ross L, Morrobel J, Malaret L, Hernandez R, Kominiak T. 2001. Complex communities and emergent ecologies in the regional agroforest of Zambrana-Chacuey, Dominican Republic. Ecumene 8:466–92
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.
    Escobar A. 2021.. “ Transcending modernity”: contribution to GTI Forum “Interrogating the Anthropocene: truth and fallacy. .” Great Transition Initiative https://greattransition.org/gti-forum/anthropocene-escobar
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.
    Nirmal P. 2017. Disembodiment and deworlding: taking decolonial feminist political ecology to ground in Attappady, Kerala PhD Thesis Clark Univ. Worcester, MA:
  4. 4.
    Emel J, Nirmal P 2021. A feminist research agenda for multispecies justice. A Research Agenda for Animal Geographies A Hovorka, S McCubbin, L Van Patten 23–38 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.
    Nirmal P, Rocheleau D. 2019. Decolonizing degrowth in the post-development convergence: questions, experiences, and proposals from two Indigenous territories. Environ. Plann. E. 2:465–92
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.
    Ojeda D. 2016. Los paisajes del despojo: propuestas para un análisis desde las reconfiguraciones socioespaciales. Rev. Colomb. Antropol. 52:219–43
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 7.
    Di Chiro G. 2017. Welcome to the White (M)Anthropocene? A feminist-environmentalist critique. Routledge Handbook of Gender and Environment S MacGregor 487–504 London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 8.
    Haraway D. 2015. Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making kin. Environ. Human. 6:1159–65
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 9.
    Las Canta LD. 2017. El Faloceno. Redefinir el Antropoceno desde una mirada ecofeminista. Ecol. Política 53:26–33
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 10.
    Malm A, Hornborg A. 2014. The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative. Anthr. Rev. 1:162–69
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 11.
    Moore J 2016. Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History and the Crisis of Capitalism San Francisco: PM Press
  12. 12.
    Tsing A. 2016. Earth stalked by man. Camb. J. Anthropol. 34:112–16
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 13.
    Holt-Giménez E. 2017. A Foodie's Guide to Capitalism: Understanding the Political Economy of What We Eat New York: Mon. Rev. Press
  14. 14.
    McKay B, Alonso-Fradejas A, Ezquerro-Cañete A, eds. 2021. Agrarian Extractivism in Latin America London: Routledge
  15. 15.
    Soper K. 2020. Post-Growth Living: For an Alternative Hedonism London: Verso
  16. 16.
    Betasamosake Simpson L. 2017. As We Have Always Done: Indigenous Freedom through Radical Resistance Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  17. 17.
    Rocheleau D. 2015. Networked, rooted and territorial: green grabbing and resistance in Chiapas. J. Peasant Stud. 42:695–723
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 18.
    Harcourt W, Nelson IL, eds. 2015. Practising Feminist Political Ecologies: Moving Beyond the ‘Green Economy. London: Zed Books
  19. 19.
    EZLN (Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional) 1996. Cuarta declaración de la Selva Lacandona Doc. 3 EZLN Jan. 1 Mexico City: https://enlacezapatista.ezln.org.mx/1996/01/01/cuarta-declaracion-de-la-selva-lacandona/
  20. 20.
    Harcourt W 2016. The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Development: Critical Engagements in Feminist Theory and Practice New York: Springer
  21. 21.
    Carney J. 1993. Converting the wetlands, engendering the environment: the intersection of gender with agrarian change in The Gambia. Econ. Geogr. 69:3329–48
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 22.
    Rocheleau D, Thomas-Slater B, Wangari E, eds. 1996. Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences London: Routledge
  23. 23.
    Sultana F. 2006. Gendered waters, poisoned wells: political ecology of the arsenic crisis in Bangladesh. Fluid Bonds: Views on Gender and Water K Lahiri-Dutt 362–86 Kolkata, India: Stree Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 24.
    Cruz Hernández DT. 2016. Una mirada muy otra a los territorios-cuerpos femeninos. Solar 12:146–53
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 25.
    Daigle M. 2018. Resurging through Kishiichiwan: the spatial politics of Indigenous water relations. Decolon.: Indig. Educ. Soc. 7:1159–72
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 26.
    Merchant C. 1980. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution New York: HarperOne
  27. 27.
    Plumwood V. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature London: Routledge
  28. 28.
    Ruether RR. 1995. New Woman, New Earth: Sexist Ideologies and Human Liberation Boston: Beacon Press
  29. 29.
    Marmon Silko L. 1977. Ceremony New York City: Viking Press
  30. 30.
    Diamond I, Orenstein GF, eds. 1990. Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism San Francisco: Sierra Club
  31. 31.
    Adams CJ, Gruen L, eds. 2014. Ecofeminism: Feminist Intersections with Other Animals and the Earth New York: Bloomsbury
  32. 32.
    Merchant C. 1989. Ecological Revolutions: Nature, Gender, and Science in New England Chapel Hill: Univ. North Carolina
  33. 33.
    Mies M. 1986. Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour London: Zed Books
  34. 34.
    Bennholdt-Thomsen V, Mies M. 1999. The Subsistence Perspective: Beyond the Globalised Economy London: Zed Books
  35. 35.
    Federici S. 2004. Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation New York: Autonomedia
  36. 36.
    Fraser N. 2020. Teorizar el capitalismo. Los talleres ocultos del capital: Un mapa para la izquierda13–70 Madrid, Spain: Traficantes de Sueños
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 37.
    Shiva V. 1988. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development London: Zed Books
  38. 38.
    Seager J. 1993. Earth Follies: Feminism, Politics, and the Environment London: Earthscan
  39. 39.
    Schmink M. 1999. Conceptual framework for gender and community-based conservation White Pap. Manag. Ecosyst. Resour. Gender Emphasis, Tropic. Conserv. Dev. Progr., Cent. Lat. Am. Stud., Univ. Fla. Gainesville:
  40. 40.
    Thomas-Slayter B, Rocheleau D 1995. Gender, Environment and Development in Kenya: Perspectives from the Grassroots Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner
  41. 41.
    Rocheleau D, Ross L. 1995. Trees as tools, trees as text: struggles over resources in Zambrana-Chacuey, Dominican Republic. Antipode 27:407–28
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 42.
    Schroeder R. 1999. Shady Practices: Agroforestry and Gender Politics in The Gambia Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  43. 43.
    Wolch J, Emel J, eds. 1998. Animal Geographies: Place, Politics, and Identity in the Nature-Culture Borderlands London: Verso
  44. 44.
    Roth R. 2009. The challenges of mapping complex indigenous spatiality: from abstract space to dwelling space. Cult. Geogr. 16:207–27
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 45.
    Manzi M 2020. Fighting against or coexisting with drought? Conviviality, inequality, and peasant mobility in Northeast Brazil. Convivial Constellations in Latin America: From Colonial to Contemporary Times L Scarato, F Baldraia, M Manzi 143–57 London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 46.
    Hovorka AJ. 2017. Animal geographies I: Globalizing and decolonizing. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 41:382–94
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 47.
    Nightingale AJ. 2011. Bounding difference: intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal. Geoforum 42:153–62
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 48.
    Sultana F. 2014. Gendering climate change: geographical insights. Prof. Geogr. 66:3372–81
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 49.
    Harris L. 2015. Foreword: A quarter century of knowledge and change: pushing feminism, politics, and ecology in new directions with feminist political ecology. A Political Ecology of Women, Water and Global Environmental Change S Buechler, AM Hanson xix–xxiii London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 50.
    Hawkins R, Ojeda D. 2011. A discussion. Environ. Plann. D. 29:237–53
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 51.
    Reo NJ, Ogden LA. 2018. Anishnaabe Aki: an indigenous perspective on the global threat of invasive species. Sustain. Sci. 13:1443–52
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 52.
    Asher K. 2009. Black and Green: Afro-Colombians, Development, and Nature in the Pacific Lowlands Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  53. 53.
    Álvarez SE, Friedman EJ, Beckman E, Blackwell M, Stoltz Chinchilla N et al. 2003. Encountering Latin American and Caribbean feminisms. Signs: J. Women Culture Soc. 28:2537–79
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 54.
    Acosta A. 2015. Después del saqueo: Caminos hacia el posextractivismo. Perspect. Anál. Coment. Polít. Am. Lat. 1:12–15
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 55.
    Vélez Torres I. 2014. Dimensiones del extractivismo minero en Colombia. Análisis de las racionalidades del gobierno durante la última década. Anál. Polít. 27:8245–57
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 56.
    Veltmeyer H, Bowles P. 2014. Extractivist resistance: the case of the Enbridge oil pipeline project in Northern British Columbia. Extr. Ind. Soc. 1:159–68
    [Google Scholar]
  57. 57.
    Gómez-Barris M. 2017. The Extractive Zone: Social Ecologies and Decolonial Perspectives Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  58. 58.
    Rivera Cusicanqui S. 2010. Violencias (re)encubiertas en Bolivia La Paz, Boliv.: Ed. Piedra Rota
  59. 59.
    Smith A. 2005. Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide Boston: South End Press
  60. 60.
    Richie H, Roser M, Rosada P. 2021. Energy Rep. Our World in Data https://ourworldindata.org/energy
  61. 61.
    Richie H, Roser M. 2021. Palm oil Rep. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/palm-oil
  62. 62.
    Di Chiro G. 2008. Living environmentalisms: coalition politics, social reproduction, and environmental justice. Environ. . Politics 17:2276–98
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 63.
    Ye J, van der Ploeg J, Schneider S, Shanin T. 2020. The incursions of extractivism: moving from dispersed places to global capitalism. J. Peasant Stud. 47:1155–83
    [Google Scholar]
  64. 64.
    Svampa M. 2013. Consenso de los commodities y lenguajes de valoración en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad 244:430–46
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 65.
    Ayala Carrillo MR, Zapata Martelo E, Cortés Cortés R. 2017. Extractivismo: expresión del sistema capitalista-colonial-patriarcal. Ecol. Polít. 54:62–66
    [Google Scholar]
  66. 66.
    Petras J, Veltmeyer H. 2014. The New Extractivism: A Post-Neoliberal Development Model or Imperialism of the 21st Century? London: Zed Books
  67. 67.
    Borras J, Franco J. 2012. Global land grabbing and trajectories of agrarian change: a preliminary analysis. J. Agrar. Change 12:134–59
    [Google Scholar]
  68. 68.
    Harcourt W. 2017. Gender and sustainable livelihoods: linking gendered experiences of environment, community and self. Agric. Hum. Values 34:1007–19
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 69.
    Rocheleau D, Nirmal P 2015. Feminist political ecologies: grounded, networked and rooted on Earth. The Oxford Handbook of Transnational Feminist Movements B Rawwida, W Harcourt 793–814 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 70.
    Berman Arévalo E, Ojeda D. 2020. Ordinary geographies: care, violence and agrarian extractivism in “post-conflict” “Colombia. ”. Antipode 52:61583–1602
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 71.
    Fernandez B. 2018. Dispossession and the depletion of social reproduction. Antipode 50:1142–63
    [Google Scholar]
  72. 72.
    Ulloa A. 2016. Feminismos territoriales en América latina: defensas de la vida frente a los extractivismos. Nómadas 45:123–39
    [Google Scholar]
  73. 73.
    Pratt ML. 1992. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation London: Routledge
  74. 74.
    Dunbar-Ortiz R. 2014. An Indigenous People's History of the United States Boston: Beacon Press
  75. 75.
    Hannah-Jones N, Elliott M, Hughes J, Silverstein J. 2019. The 1619 Project. New York Times Magazine August 18
    [Google Scholar]
  76. 76.
    Riofrancos T. 2017. Extractivismo unearthed: a genealogy of a radical discourse. Cult. Stud. 31:2–3277–306
    [Google Scholar]
  77. 77.
    Giacomini T, Turner T, Isla A, Brownhill L. 2018. Ecofeminism against capitalism and for the commons. Capital. Nat. Social. 29:11–6
    [Google Scholar]
  78. 78.
    FAU (Fondo de Acción Urgente) 2021. Extractivismos, pandemia y otros mundos posibles Rep. FAU Bogota, Colomb:.
  79. 79.
    Timm Hidalgo AK. 2018. Feminicidio extractivista. Reflexiones sobre la violencia hacia las mujeres defensoras del agua y los territorios. Mujeres en defensa de territorios. Reflexiones feministas frente al extractivismo A Erpel Jara. 91–100 Santiago, Chile: Fund. Heinrich Böll
    [Google Scholar]
  80. 80.
    Ojeda D. 2021. Social reproduction, dispossession and the gendered workings of agrarian extractivism in Colombia. Agrarian Extractivism in Latin America BM McKay, A Alonso-Fradejas, A Ezquerro-Cañete 85–98 London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  81. 81.
    Erpel Jara A 2018. Mujeres en defensa de territorios. Reflexiones feministas frente al extractivismo Santiago, Chile: Fund. Heinrich Böll
  82. 82.
    Leguizamón A. 2019. The gendered dimensions of resource extractivism in Argentina's soy boom. Latin Am. Perspect. 46:2199–216
    [Google Scholar]
  83. 83.
    León Araya A. 2017. Domesticando el despojo: palma africana, acaparamiento de tierras y género en el Bajo Aguán, Honduras. Rev. Colomb. Antropol. 53:1151–85
    [Google Scholar]
  84. 84.
    Silva Santisteban R. 2017. Mujeres y conflictos ecoterritoriales: impactos, estrategias, resistencias Rep. Entrepueblos, Asoc. Investig. Espec. Temas Iberoam., Demus. Estud. Def. Derechos Mujer, CMP Flora Tristán, Coord. Nac. Derechos Hum. Lima, Peru:
  85. 85.
    Singh J. 2018. Unthinking Mastery: Dehumanism and Decolonial Entanglements Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  86. 86.
    Trevilla Espinal DL, Soto Pinto ML, Morales H, Estrada-Lugo EIJ 2021. Feminist agroecology: analyzing power relationships in food systems. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 45:71029–49
    [Google Scholar]
  87. 87.
    Cabnal L. 2018. Acercamiento a la construcción de la propuesta de pensamiento epistémico de las mujeres indígenas feministas comunitarias de Abya Yala. Momento de paro, tiempo de rebelión. Miradas feministas para reinterpretar la lucha11–25 Lima, Peru: Minervas Ed.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. 88.
    Cruz Hernández DT. 2019. Mujeres, cuerpo y territorios: entre la defensa y la desposesión. Cuerpos, Territorios y Feminismos DT Cruz Hernández, M Bayón Jiménez 45–62 Mexico City: Inst. Estud. Ecol. Tercer Mundo, Ed. Abya-Yala, Bajo Tierra Ed., Lib. Bajo Palabra
    [Google Scholar]
  89. 89.
    Guzmán A. 2019. Descolonizar la memoria. Descolonizar los feminismos La Paz, Bol.: Tarpuna Muya
  90. 90.
    Penniman L. 2018. Farming While Black: Soul Fire Farm's Practical Guide To Liberation on The Land Hartford, VT: Chelsea Green Publ.
  91. 91.
    Davis J, Moulton A, Van Sant L, Williams B 2019. Anthropocene, Capitalocene, … Plantationocene?: A Manifesto for Ecological Justice in an Age of Global Crises. Geography Compass 13:5e12438
    [Google Scholar]
  92. 92.
    Haraway DJ. 2008. When Species Meet Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  93. 93.
    Rose DB. 2011. Wild Dog Dreaming: Love and Extinction Charlottesville: Univ. Va. Press
  94. 94.
    Bar-On YM, Phillips R, Milo R 2018. The biomass distribution on earth. PNAS 115:256506–11
    [Google Scholar]
  95. 95.
    Worm B, Barbier EB, Beaumont N, Duffy JE, Folke C et al. 2006. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314:5800787–90
    [Google Scholar]
  96. 96.
    Shahbanden M. 2021. Meat industry value worldwide in 2020 and forecast for 2021 and 2025 (in billion U.S. dollars). Global Meat Products Market Value 2020–2025 Statista, July 26. https://www.statista.com/statistics/502286/global-meat-and-seafood-market-value/
    [Google Scholar]
  97. 97.
    The Pew Charitable Trusts 2021. Project: International Fisheries. The Pew Charitable Trusts https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/projects/international-fisheries
    [Google Scholar]
  98. 98.
    Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, de Haan C. 2006. Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options Rome: UN Food Agric. Organ.
  99. 99.
    Emel J, Neo H, eds. 2015. Political Ecologies of Meat London: Routledge
  100. 100.
    FAO (UN Food Agric. Organ.) 2019. Meat and meat products. Animal Production and Health (NSA) FAO https://www.fao.org/ag/againfo/themes/en/meat/home.html
    [Google Scholar]
  101. 101.
    Weis T. 2013. The Ecological Hoofprint: The Global Burden of Industrial Livestock London: Zed Books
  102. 102.
    Collard RC, Dempsey J, Holmberg M. 2020. Extirpation despite regulation? Environmental assessment and caribou. Conserv. Sci. Pract 2:4e166
    [Google Scholar]
  103. 103.
    Watts V. 2013. Indigenous place-thought & agency amongst humans and non-humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European world tour!). Decolon.: Indig. Educ. Soc. 2:120–34
    [Google Scholar]
  104. 104.
    Davis H, Todd Z. 2017. On the importance of a date, or, decolonizing the Anthropocene. ACME 16:4761–80
    [Google Scholar]
  105. 105.
    Emel J. 1998. Are you man enough, big and bad enough? Wolf eradication in the US. Animal Geographies: Place, Politics, and Identity in the Nature-Culture Borderlands J Wolch, J Emel 91–118 London: Verso
    [Google Scholar]
  106. 106.
    Rosen T. 2020. The evolving war on illegal wildlife trade. Still only one Earth: lessons from 50 years of UN sustainable development policy Earth Negot. Bull. Brief 3, Int. Inst. Sustain. Dev., Oct. 6. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2020-10/still-one-earth-wildlife-trade.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  107. 107.
    Collard RC. 2020. Animal Traffic: Lively Capital in the Global Exotic Pet Trade Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  108. 108.
    Dempsey J. 2016. Enterprising Nature: Economics, Markets and Finance in Global Biodiversity Politics Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell
  109. 109.
    Malm A, the Zetkin Collective. 2021. White Skin, Black Fuel: On the Danger of Fossil Fascism London: Verso
  110. 110.
    Deckha M. 2021. Animals as Legal Beings: Contesting Anthropocentric Legal Orders Toronto: Univ. Tor. Press
  111. 111.
    Haraway D. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  112. 112.
    Wadiwel D. 2018. Chicken harvesting machine: animal labor, resistance, and the time of production. S. Atl. Q. 117:3527–49
    [Google Scholar]
  113. 113.
    Gillespie K. 2018. Placing Angola: racialisation, anthropocentrism, and settler colonialism at the Louisiana State Penitentiary's Angola Rodeo. Antipode 50:31267–89
    [Google Scholar]
  114. 114.
    Ko A. 2019. Racism as Zoological Witchcraft: A Guide to Getting Out New York: Lantern Books
  115. 115.
    Pachirat T. 2011. Every Twelve Seconds: Industrialized Slaughter and the Politics of Sight New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  116. 116.
    Block K, Amundson S. 2021. USA: Infamous trophy hunt shows what happens when gray wolves are stripped of protections. World Animals Voice June 17. https://worldanimalsvoice.com/2021/06/17/usa-infamous-trophy-hunt-shows-what-happens-when-gray-wolves-are-stripped-of-protections/
    [Google Scholar]
  117. 117.
    Macktima M. 2017. Examining historical issues pertaining to San Carlos Apache tribal identities through peoplehood Master's Thesis Univ. Okla., Norman
  118. 118.
    Pérez Orozco A. 2011. Crisis multidimensional y sostenibilidad de la vida. Investig. Fem. 2:29–53
    [Google Scholar]
  119. 119.
    Cabnal L. 2015. Sin ser consultadas: La mercantilización de nuestro territorio cuerpo-tierra. Mujeres defendiendo el territorio. Experiencias de participación en América Latina41–55 Bogota, Colomb.: Fondo Acción Urgent.
    [Google Scholar]
  120. 120.
    Aguilar RG, Linsalata L, Trujillo MLN. 2017. Producing the common and reproducing life: Keys towards rethinking the political. Social Sciences for an Other Politics: Women Theorizing Without Parachutes AC Dinerstein 79–92 Cham, Switz.: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  121. 121.
    León Araya A. 2022. The fruits of labor or the fruits of nature? Towards a political ecology of labor in Central America. Routledge Handbook of Latin America and the Environment B Bustos, S Engel di Mauro, G García, F Milanez D Ojeda. London: Routledge. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  122. 122.
    Collard RC, Dempsey J. 2017. Capitalist natures in five orientations. Capital. Nat. Social. 28:178–97
    [Google Scholar]
  123. 123.
    Bell SE. 2016. Fighting King Coal: The Challenges to Micromobilization in Central Appalachia Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  124. 124.
    Belcourt B-R. 2015. Animal bodies, colonial subjects: (re)locating animality in decolonial thought. Societies 5:1–11
    [Google Scholar]
  125. 125.
    Rocheleau D, Roth R. 2007. Rooted networks, relational webs and powers of connection: rethinking human and political ecologies. Geoforum 38:3433–37
    [Google Scholar]
  126. 126.
    Escobar A. 2008. Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life, Redes Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  127. 127.
    Picq M. 2014. Self-determination as anti-extractivism: how indigenous resistance challenges world politics. Restoring Indigenous Self-Determination: Theoretical and Practical Approaches M Woons 26–33 Bristol, UK: E-Int. Relat.
    [Google Scholar]
  128. 128.
    Sack R. 1983. Human Territoriality: A Theory Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
  129. 129.
    Harding S. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  130. 130.
    Lorde A. 1982. Learning from the 60s Paper presented at Malcolm X Weekend at Harvard University Cambridge, MA, Febr: https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1982-audre-lorde-learning-60s/
  131. 131.
    Grossman Z. 2017. Unlikely Alliances: Native Nations And White Communities Join To Defend Rural Lands Seattle: Univ. Wash. Press
  132. 132.
    Tsing A. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  133. 133.
    LaDuke W. 1999. All Our Relations: Native Struggles for Land and Life Boston: South End Press
  134. 134.
    Alfred T. 2005. Wasáse: Indigenous Pathways of Action and Freedom Toronto: Univ. Tor. Press
  135. 135.
    Haraway DJ. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science London: Routledge
  136. 136.
    Celemajer D, Scholsberg D, Rickards L, Stewart-Harawara M, Thaler M et al. 2021. Multispecies justice: theories, challenges, and a research agenda for environmental politics. Environ. . Politics 30:1–2119–40
    [Google Scholar]
  137. 137.
    Fernando JL. 2020. From the Virocene to the Lovecene epoch: multispecies justice as critical praxis for Virocene disruptions and vulnerabilities. J. Pol. Ecol. 27:1685–90
    [Google Scholar]
  138. 138.
    Tschakert P, Schlosberg D, Celemajer D, Rickards L, Winter C et al. 2020. Multispecies justice: climate-just futures with, for and beyond humans. WIREs Clim Change 12:2e699
    [Google Scholar]
  139. 139.
    Arcari P, Robyn-Rapsey F, Singer H 2021. Where species don't meet: invisibilized animals, urban nature and city limits. Environ. Plann. E. 4:3940–65
    [Google Scholar]
  140. 140.
    Srinivasan K. 2017. Conservation biopolitics and the sustainability episteme. Environ. Plan. A. 49:71458–76
    [Google Scholar]
  141. 141.
    Srinivasan K. 2013. The biopolitics of animal being and welfare: dog control and care in the UK and India. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 38:1106–19
    [Google Scholar]
  142. 142.
    Jackson ZI. 2020. Becoming Human: Matter and Meaning in an Antiblack World New York: New York Univ. Press
  143. 143.
    Wynter S. 1997.. ‘ Genital mutilation’ or ‘symbolic birth?’ Female circumcision, lost origins, and the aculturalism of feminist/Western thought. Case West. . Reserve Law Rev 47:2501–52
    [Google Scholar]
  144. 144.
    Schiebinger L. 1993. Nature's Body: Gender in the Making of Modern Science Boston: Beacon Press
  145. 145.
    Hovorka A. 2015. Feminism and animals: exploring interspecies relations through intersectionality, performativity and standpoint. Gender, Place Cult 22:11–19
    [Google Scholar]
  146. 146.
    Kim CJ. 2015. Dangerous Crossings: Race, Species, and Nature in a Multicultural Age New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  147. 147.
    Potter E, Miller F, Lovbrand E, Houston D, McLean J et al. 2020. A manifesto for shadow places: re-imagining and co-producing connections for justice in an era of climate change. Environ. Plann. E. 5:1272–92
    [Google Scholar]
  148. 148.
    Gillespie K, Narayanan Y. 2020. Animal nationalisms: multispecies cultural politics, race, and the (un)making of the settler nation-state. J. Intercult. Stud. 41:11–7
    [Google Scholar]
  149. 149.
    Gumbs AP. 2020. Undrowned: Black Feminist Lessons from Marine Mammals Oakland, CA: AK Press
  150. 150.
    Tran D. 2021. A comparative study of women environmental defenders’ antiviolent success strategies.. Geoforum 126:126–38
    [Google Scholar]
  151. 151.
    Johnson AE, Wilkinson KK, eds. 2021. All We Can Save: Truth, Courage, and Solutions for the Climate Crisis New York: One World
  152. 152.
    Hernández KJ, Rubis JM, Theriault N, Todd Z, Mitchell A et al. 2021. The Creatures Collective: manifestings. Environ. Plann. E. 4:3838–63
    [Google Scholar]
  153. 153.
    The Red Nation 2021. The Red Deal: Indigenous Action to Save Our Earth New York: Commons Notions
  154. 154.
    Wadiwel D. 2020. Foreword: Thinking “critically” about animals after colonialism. Colonialism and Animality: Anti-Colonial Perspectives in Critical Animal Studies K Struthers Montford, C Taylor, xvii–xxiv London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-092246
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error