1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  4. Volume 39, 2014
  5. Article

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volume 39, 2014

Environmental Ethics

Abstract

Environmental ethics—the study of ethical questions raised by human relations with the nonhuman environment—emerged as an important subfield of philosophy during the 1970s. It is now a flourishing area of research. This article provides a review of the secular, Western traditions in the field. It examines both anthropocentric and nonanthropocentric claims about what has value, as well as divergent views about whether environmental ethics should be concerned with bringing about best consequences, respecting principles and rights, or embodying environmental virtues. The article also briefly considers two critical traditions—ecofeminism and environmental pragmatism—and explores some of the difficult environmental ethics questions posed by anthropogenic climate change.

Keyword(s): climate ethics, environmental ethics, environmental values, ethical theory, intrinsic value
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-121112-094434
2014-10-17
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/energy/39/1/annurev-environ-121112-094434.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-121112-094434&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Preston CJ. 1.  2005. Epistemology and environmental philosophy. Special issue. Ethics Environ. 10:21–216 [Google Scholar]
  2. Odenbaugh J. 2.  2007. Seeing the forest and the trees. Philos. Sci. 74:628–41 [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlson A. 3.  2008. Nature and Landscape: An Introduction to Environmental Aesthetics New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  4. Jenkins W, Chapple C. 4.  2011. Religion and environment. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 36:441–63 [Google Scholar]
  5. Kelbessa W. 5.  2005. The rehabilitation of indigenous environmental ethics in Africa. Diogenes 52:317–34 [Google Scholar]
  6. James SP, Cooper D. 6.  2008. Buddhism and the environment. Special edition. Contemp. Buddhism 8:293–108 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown C, Toadvine T. 7.  2003. Eco-Phenomenology: Back to the Earth Itself Albany: State Univ. N.Y. Press
  8. Foltz B, Frodeman B. 8.  2004. Rethinking Nature: Essays in Environmental Philosophy Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
  9. Westra L, Robinson T. 9.  1997. The Greeks and the Environment Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
  10. Leopold A. 10.  1968 [1949]. A Sand County Almanac: And Sketches Here and There Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press, 2nd ed..
  11. Taylor P. 11.  1986. Respect for Nature Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  12. Rolston H. 12.  1986. Philosophy Gone Wild New York: Prometheus
  13. Elliot R, Gare A. 13.  1983. Environmental Philosophy: A Collection of Readings Milton Keynes, UK: Open Univ. Press
  14. Des Jardins JR. 14.  1993. Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
  15. VanDeVeer D, Pierce C. 15.  1993. The Environmental Ethics and Policy Book Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
  16. Minteer BA. 16.  2012. Refounding Environmental Ethics: Pragmatism, Principle, and Practice Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
  17. O'Neill J. 17.  1992. The varieties of intrinsic value. Monist 75:2119–37 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jamieson D. 18.  2008. Ethics and the Environment: An Introduction Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  19. McShane K. 19.  2007. Why environmental ethics shouldn't give up on intrinsic value. Environ. Ethics 29:143–61 [Google Scholar]
  20. Attfield R. 20.  1995. Value, Obligation, and Meta-Ethics Amsterdam: Rodopi
  21. Norton BG. 21.  1987. Why Preserve Natural Variety? Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  22. Rolston H. 22.  1988. Environmental Ethics Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
  23. Weston A. 23.  1985. Beyond intrinsic value: pragmatism in environmental ethics. Environ. Ethics 7:4321–39 [Google Scholar]
  24. Maguire LA, Justus J. 24.  2008. Why intrinsic value is a poor basis for conservation decisions. BioScience 58:10910–11 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fox W. 25.  1993. What does the recognition of intrinsic value entail?. Trumpeter 10:3 http://trumpeter.athabascau.ca/index.php/trumpet/article/view/379/601 [Google Scholar]
  26. Callicott JB. 26.  1992. Can a theory of moral sentiments support a genuinely normative environmental ethic?. Inquiry 35:183–98 [Google Scholar]
  27. Warren MA. 27.  2000. Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  28. Goodpaster KE. 28.  1978. On being morally considerable. J. Philos. 75:6308–25 [Google Scholar]
  29. White L Jr. 29.  1967. The historic roots of our ecologic crisis. Science 155:37671203–7 [Google Scholar]
  30. Naess A. 30.  1973. The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry 16:195–100 [Google Scholar]
  31. Devall B, Sessions G. 31.  1985. Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered Salt Lake City, UT: Gibbs Smith
  32. Norton BG. 32.  1991. Towards Unity Among Environmentalists New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  33. Singer P. 33.  1975. Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals New York: Avon
  34. Regan T. 34.  1983. The Case for Animal Rights Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  35. Cahen H. 35.  1988. Against the moral considerability of ecosystems. Environ. Ethics 10:3195–216 [Google Scholar]
  36. Thompson J. 36.  1990. A refutation of environmental ethics. Environ. Ethics 12:147–60 [Google Scholar]
  37. Johnson L. 37.  1991. A Morally Deep World Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  38. Nelson M. 38.  1993. A defense of environmental ethics: a reply to Janna Thompson. Environ. Ethics 45:245–57 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sandler R. 39.  2013. The Ethics of Species London: Cambridge Univ. Press
  40. Callicott JB. 40.  1980. Animal liberation: a triangular affair. Environ. Ethics 2:311–28 [Google Scholar]
  41. Varner G. 41.  1998. In Nature's Interests? Interests, Animal Rights and Environmental Ethics Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  42. 42. US Environ. Prot. Agency (EPA) 2013. Plan EJ 2014 Progress Report Washington, DC: EPA http://www.epa.gov/compliance/ej/resources/policy/plan-ej-2014/plan-ej-progress-report-2014.pdf
  43. Camacho D. 43.  1998. Environmental Injustices, Political Struggles: Race, Class, and the Environment Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  44. Bullard RD, Mohai P, Saha R, Wright B. 44.  2007. Toxic Wastes and Race at Twenty: 1989–2007 Cleveland, OH: United Church Christ
  45. Westra L, Lawson B. 45.  2001. Faces of Environmental Racism: Confronting Issues of Global Justice Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2nd ed..
  46. Sandler R, Pezzullo PC. 46.  2007. Environmental Justice and Environmentalism Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  47. Schlosberg D. 47.  2007. Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements and Nature New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  48. Shrader-Frechette K. 48.  2002. Environmental Justice: Creating Equality, Reclaiming Democracy Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  49. Bryant B. 49.  1995. Environmental Justice: Issues, Policies, and Solutions Washington, DC: Island
  50. Guha R. 50.  1989. Radical American environmentalism and wilderness preservation: a third world critique. Environ. Ethics 11:71–83 [Google Scholar]
  51. Shiva V. 51.  1999. Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge Cambridge, MA: South End
  52. Hassoun N. 52.  2012. The problem of debt-for-nature swaps from a human rights perspective. J. Appl. Philos. 29:4359–77 [Google Scholar]
  53. Gardiner S. 53.  2009. The Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  54. Singer P. 54.  2004. One World: The Ethics of Globalization New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  55. 55. World Comm. Environ. Dev 1987. Our Common Future. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  56. Thompson PB. 56.  2012. Sustainability: ethical foundations. Nat. Educ. Knowledge 3:1011 http://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/sustainability-ethical-foundations-71373239 [Google Scholar]
  57. Norton BG. 57.  2005. Sustainability: A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  58. Thompson PB. 58.  2010. The Agrarian Vision: Sustainability and Environmental Ethics Lexington: Univ. Ky. Press
  59. Posner E, Sunstein C. 59.  2008. Climate change justice. Georget. Law J. 96:1565–612 [Google Scholar]
  60. Caney S. 60.  2012. Just emissions. Philos. Public Aff. 40:4255–300 [Google Scholar]
  61. Broome J. 61.  2012. Climate Matters New York: Norton
  62. Parfit D. 62.  1984. Reasons and Persons Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  63. Mulgan T. 63.  2006. Future People New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  64. Roberts M, Wasserman D. 64.  2009. Harming Future Persons New York: Springer
  65. 65. U.N. Food Agric. Organ. (UNFAO) 2012. State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture Rome: Food Agric. Organ. U.N.
  66. Haberl H, Erb KH, Krausmann F, Gaube V, Bondeau A. 66.  et al. 2007. Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in Earth's terrestrial ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:3112942–47 [Google Scholar]
  67. Singer P. 67.  1979. Killing humans and killing animals. Inquiry 22:145–56 [Google Scholar]
  68. Palmer C. 68.  2010. Animal Ethics in Context New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  69. Donaldson S, Kymlicka W. 69.  2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  70. Carruthers P. 70.  1992. The Animals Issue London: Cambridge Univ. Press
  71. Cohen C. 71.  1986. The case for the use of animals in biomedical research. N. Engl. J. Med. 315:14865–70 [Google Scholar]
  72. Nobis N. 72.  2004. Carl Cohen's ‘kind’ argument for animal rights and against animal rights. J. Appl. Philos. 21:143–59 [Google Scholar]
  73. Schweitzer A. 73.  1987 [1923]. The Philosophy of Civilization New York: Prometheus
  74. Attfield R. 74.  1987. A Theory of Value and Obligation Beckenham, UK: Croom Helm
  75. Agar N. 75.  2001. Life's Intrinsic Value New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  76. Schmidtz D. 76.  1998. Are all species equal?. J. Appl. Philos. 15:57–67 [Google Scholar]
  77. Sterba JP. 77.  1998. A biocentrist strikes back. Environ. Ethics 20:361–76 [Google Scholar]
  78. Callicott JB. 78.  1989. In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy Albany: State Univ. N.Y. Press
  79. Norton BG. 79.  1988. The constancy of Leopold's land ethic. Conserv. Biol. 2:193–102 [Google Scholar]
  80. Callicott JB. 80.  1987. Companion to ‘A Sand County Almanac’: Interpretive and Critical Essays Madison: Univ. Wis. Press
  81. Sagoff M. 81.  2013. What does environmental protection protect?. Ethics Policy Environ. 16:3239–57 [Google Scholar]
  82. Costanza R, Norton BG, Haskell BD. 82.  1992. Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management Washington, DC: Island
  83. Westra L. 83.  1994. An Environmental Proposal for Ethics: The Principle of Integrity Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
  84. Jamieson D. 84.  1995. Ecosystem health: some preventive medicine. Environ. Values 4:333–44 [Google Scholar]
  85. McShane K. 85.  2004. Ecosystem health. Environ. Ethics 26:3227–45 [Google Scholar]
  86. Soulé M. 86.  1985. What is conservation biology?. BioScience 35:11727–34 [Google Scholar]
  87. Katz E. 87.  1992. The big lie: human restoration of nature. Res. Philos. Technol. 12:231–41 [Google Scholar]
  88. Bradley B. 88.  2001. The value of endangered species. J. Value Inq. 35:43–58 [Google Scholar]
  89. Maier DS. 89.  2012. What's So Good About Biodiversity? A Call for Better Reasoning About Nature's Value Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer
  90. Preston CJ. 90.  2011. Re-thinking the unthinkable: environmental ethics and the presumptive argument against geoengineering. Environ. Values 20:457–79 [Google Scholar]
  91. Elliot R. 91.  1982. Faking nature. Inquiry 25:81–93 [Google Scholar]
  92. Hettinger N, Throop W. 92.  1999. Refocusing ecocentrism. Environ. Ethics 21:13–21 [Google Scholar]
  93. Callicott JB, Nelson MP. 93.  1999. The Great New Wilderness Debate Athens: Univ. Georgia Press
  94. Kareiva P, Marvier M. 94.  2012. What is conservation science?. BioScience 62:11962–69 [Google Scholar]
  95. McKibben B. 95.  1989. The End of Nature New York: Random House
  96. Carter A. 96.  2005. Inegalitarian biocentric consequentialism, the minimax implication and multidimensional value theory: a brief proposal for a new direction in environmental ethics. Utilitas 17:162–84 [Google Scholar]
  97. Singer P. 97.  1989. All animals are equal. Animal Rights and Human Obligations T Regan, P Singer 148–62 Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall [Google Scholar]
  98. Holbrook D. 98.  1997. The consequentialist side of environmental ethics. Environ. Values 6:187–96 [Google Scholar]
  99. McMahan J. 99.  2010. The meat eaters. New York Times Sept. 19. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/19/the-meat-eaters/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0
  100. Sagoff M. 100.  1984. Animal liberation and environmental ethics: bad marriage, quick divorce. Osgoode Hall Law J. 22:297–307 [Google Scholar]
  101. Hayward T. 101.  2005. Constitutional Environmental Rights Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  102. Francione G. 102.  2000. Introduction to Animal Rights: Your Child or the Dog? Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
  103. Cochrane A. 103.  2012. Animal Rights Without Liberation New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  104. Hill TE Jr. 104.  1983. Ideals of human excellence and preserving natural environments. Environ. Ethics 5:3211–24 [Google Scholar]
  105. Sandler R. 105.  2007. Character and Environment: A Virtue-Oriented Approach to Environmental Ethics New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  106. Sandler R, Cafaro P. 106.  2005. Environmental Virtue Ethics Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
  107. van Wensveen L. 107.  2000. Dirty Virtues: The Emergence of Ecological Virtue Ethics Amherst, NY: Prometheus
  108. Warren K. 108.  1993. Introduction. Environmental Philosophy: From Animal Rights to Radical Ecology ME Zimmerman, JB Callicott, J Clark, KJ Warren, IJ Klaver, J Clark 253–67 Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall [Google Scholar]
  109. Ruether RR. 109.  1975. New Woman, New Earth: Sexist Ideologies and Human Liberation New York: Seabury
  110. Plumwood V. 110.  1991. Nature, self and gender: feminism, environmental philosophy and the critique of rationalism. Hypatia 6:13–27 [Google Scholar]
  111. Kheel M. 111.  1993. From heroic to holistic ethics: the ecofeminist challenge. Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature G Gaard 243–71 Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  112. Plumwood V. 112.  1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature London: Routledge
  113. Light A, Katz E. 113.  1996. Environmental Pragmatism New York: Routledge
  114. Norton BG. 114.  1997. Convergence and contextualism: some clarifications and a reply to Steverson. Environ. Ethics 19:187–99 [Google Scholar]
  115. Light A. 115.  2002. Contemporary environmental ethics: from metaethics to public philosophy. Metaphilosophy 33:4426–49 [Google Scholar]
  116. Ferkany M, Whyte K. 116.  2012. The importance of participatory virtues in the future of environmental education. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 25:3419–34 [Google Scholar]
  117. O'Neill J. 117.  1993. Ecology, Policy and Politics London: Routledge
  118. Attfield R. 118.  2011. Climate change, environmental ethics, and biocentrism. Climate Change and Environmental Ethics VP Nanda 31–41 New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction [Google Scholar]
  119. Sarkar S. 119.  2005. Biodiversity and Environmental Philosophy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  120. Basl J, Sandler R. 120.  2013. Designer Biology: The Ethics of Intensively Engineering Biological and Ecological Systems Lanham, MD: Lexington
  121. Streiffer R, Basl J. 121.  2013. The ethics of agricultural animal biotechnology. Ethics and Emerging Technologies R Sandler 501–5 New York: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  122. Preston CJ. 122.  2008. Synthetic biology: drawing a line in Darwin's sand. Environ. Values 17:123–39 [Google Scholar]
  123. Comstock G. 123.  2001. Vexing Nature? On the Ethical Case Against Agricultural Biotechnology Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer
  124. Thompson PB. 124.  2013. Artificial meat. Ethics and Emerging Technologies R Sandler 516–30 New York: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  125. Light A. 125.  2000. Ecological restoration and the culture of nature: a pragmatic perspective. Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences P Gobster, B Hull 49–70 Washington, DC: Island [Google Scholar]
  126. Throop W. 126.  2012. Environmental virtues and the aims of restoration. See Ref. 149 47–62
  127. Higgs E. 127.  2012. History, novelty and virtue in ecological restoration. See Ref. 149 81–102
  128. Sandler R. 128.  2012. Global warming and virtues of ecological restoration. See Ref. 149 63–80
  129. Light A. 129.  2012. The death of restoration. See Ref. 149 105–24
  130. Nolt J. 130.  2011. Nonanthropocentric climate ethics. WIREs Clim. Change 2:701–11 [Google Scholar]
  131. McCoy ED, Berry K. 131.  2008. Using an ecological ethics framework to make decisions about the relocation of wildlife. Sci. Eng. Ethics 14:505–21 [Google Scholar]
  132. Camacho A. 132.  2010. Assisted migration: redefining nature and natural resource law under climate change. Yale J. Regul. 27:171–255 [Google Scholar]
  133. Aubin I, Garbe CM, Colombo S, Drever CR, McKenney DW. 133.  et al. 2011. Why we disagree about assisted migration: ethical implications of a key debate regarding the future of Canada's forest. For. Chron. 87:755–65 [Google Scholar]
  134. Albrecht G, Brooke C, Bennett D, Garnett S. 134.  2013. The ethics of assisted colonization in the age of anthropogenic climate change. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 26:827–45 [Google Scholar]
  135. Ricciardi A, Simberloff D. 135.  2008. Why assisted migration is not a viable conservation strategy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:248–53 [Google Scholar]
  136. Sandler R. 136.  2010. The value of species and the ethical foundations of assisted colonization. Conserv. Biol. 24:2424–31 [Google Scholar]
  137. Buma B. 137.  2013. Don't give up just yet: maintaining species, services and systems in a changing world. Ethics, Policy Environ. 16:33–36 [Google Scholar]
  138. Larson B, Palmer C. 138.  2013. Assisted migration is no panacea, but let's not discount it either. Ethics, Policy Environ. 16:16–18 [Google Scholar]
  139. Jamieson D. 139.  1996. Ethics and intentional climate change. Clim. Change 33:323–36 [Google Scholar]
  140. Hamilton C. 140.  2013. The ethical foundations of climate engineering. Climate Change Geoengineering: Philosophical Perspectives, Legal Issues and Governance Frameworks W Burns, A Strauss 39–58 London: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  141. Tuana N. 141.  2013. The ethical dimensions of geoengineering: solar radiation management through sulfur particle injection. Geoengineering our climate? Ethics, policy and governance. Work. Pap. 2, Geoeng. Our Clim. Work. Pap. Opin. Artic. Ser., Penn State Univ. Press http://geoengineeringourclimate.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/tuana-2013-ethics-of-geoengineering-click-for-download.pdf
  142. Hale B. 142.  2012. The world that would have been: moral hazard arguments against geoengineering. See Ref. 147 113–32
  143. Davies G. 143.  2010. Geoengineering: a critique. Clim. Law 1:3429–41 [Google Scholar]
  144. Svoboda T, Keller K, Goes M, Tuana N. 144.  2011. Sulfate aerosol geoengineering: the question of justice. Public Aff. Q. 25:3157–80 [Google Scholar]
  145. Preston CJ. 145.  2012. Solar radiation management and vulnerable populations: the moral deficit and its prospects. See Ref. 147 77–94
  146. Hamilton C. 146.  2013. No, we should not just ‘at least do the research.’. Nature 496:7444139 [Google Scholar]
  147. Preston CJ. 147.  2012. Engineering the Climate: The Ethics of Solar Radiation Management Lanham, MD: Lexington
  148. Gardiner S. 148.  2010. Is arming the future with geoengineering really the lesser evil? Some doubts about intentionally manipulating the climate system. Climate Ethics: Essential Readings S Gardiner, S Caney, D Jamieson 284–314 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  149. Thompson A, Bendik-Keymer J. 149.  2012. Ethical Adaptation to Climate Change: Human Virtues of the Future Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-121112-094434
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error