1932

Abstract

We describe a framework for analyzing the dynamics of investment, borrowing, and payout decisions by public corporations. We assume that managers act entirely in their own long-run interests, subject to a governance constraint that limits their rents. Risk-neutral managers invest to maximize value but wait too long to disinvest. Efficient disinvestment can be forced by the right level of debt or by takeovers. Risk-averse managers underinvest; they do not waste free cash flow, because the governance constraint is binding. They smooth rents and consequently payout, so that changes in borrowing become a shock absorber for volatility of operating income. We obtain the Lintner model of payout if risk-averse managers have a utility function with habit formation. We show how to adapt the dynamic framework to analyze several other issues, including the effects of asymmetric information. We show that Lintner-style payout smoothing can also arise when risk-neutral managers are better informed than outsiders.

Keyword(s): agencydebtinvestmentpayouttakeover
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-121415-032937
2016-10-23
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/financial/8/1/annurev-financial-121415-032937.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-121415-032937&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Acharya VV, Lambrecht BM. 2015. A theory of income smoothing when insiders know more than outsiders. Rev. Financ. Stud. 28:2534–74 [Google Scholar]
  2. Acharya VV, Myers SC, Rajan RG. 2011. The internal governance of firms. J. Finance 66:689–720 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhattacharya S. 1979. Imperfect information, dividend policy, and the `bird in the hand' fallacy. Bell J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 10:259–70 [Google Scholar]
  4. Biais B, Mariotti T, Rochet JC, Villeneuve S. 2010. Large risks, limited liability, and dynamic moral hazard. Econometrica 78:73–118 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolton P, Chen H, Wang N. 2011. A unified theory of Tobin's Q, corporate investment, financing, and risk management. J. Finance 66:1545–78 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolton P, Scharfstein D. 1990. A theory of predation based on agency problems in financial contracting. Am. Econ. Rev. 80:93–106 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brennan MJ, Schwartz ES. 1985. Evaluating natural resource investments. J. Bus 58:135–57 [Google Scholar]
  8. Burkart M, Gromb D, Panunzi F. 1997. Large shareholders, monitoring, and the value of the firm. Q. J. Econ 112:693–728 [Google Scholar]
  9. Caballero RJ. 1990. Consumption puzzles and precautionary savings. J. Monet. Econ 25:113–36 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen H, Miao J, Wang N. 2010. Entrepreneurial finance and nondiversifiable risk. Rev. Financ. Stud 234348–88
  11. Chu J, Faasse J, Rau PR. 2015. Do compensation consultants enable higher CEO pay? New evidence from recent disclosure rule changes Work. Pap., Judge Bus. Sch., Univ. Cambridge
  12. Décamps JP, Mariotti T, Rochet JC, Villeneuve S. 2011. Free cash flow, issuance costs and stock prices. J. Finance 661501–44
  13. DeMarzo PM, Fishman MJ. 2007. Agency and optimal investment dynamics. Rev. Financ. Stud 20:151–88 [Google Scholar]
  14. DeMarzo PM, Fishman MJ, He Z, Wang N. 2012. Dynamic agency and the q theory of investment. J. Finance 67:2295–340 [Google Scholar]
  15. DeMarzo PM, Sannikov Y. 2006. Optimal security design and dynamic capital structure in a continuous-time agency model. J. Finance 61:2681–724 [Google Scholar]
  16. DeMarzo PM, Sannikov Y. 2015. Learning, termination, and payout policy in dynamic incentive contracts Work. Pap., Stanford Grad. Sch. Bus., Stanford Univ.
  17. Diamond D. 1984. Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Rev. Econ. Stud 51:393–414 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fischer EO, Heinkel RL, Zechner J. 1989. Dynamic capital structure choice: theory and tests. J. Finance 44:19–40 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gorton G, Kahl M, Rosen R. 2009. Eat or be eaten: a theory of mergers and firm size. J. Finance 64:1291–344 [Google Scholar]
  20. Grossman SJ, Hart OD. 1988. One share–one vote and the market for corporate control. J. Financ. Econ 20:175–202 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hart O. 1995. Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press
  22. Jensen MC. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. Am. Econ. Rev 76:323–29 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jin L, Myers SC. 2006. R2 around the world: new theory and new tests. J. Financ. Econ 79:257–92 [Google Scholar]
  24. John K, Williams J. 1985. Dividends, dilution, and taxes: a signaling equilibrium. J. Finance 49:1053–70 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lambrecht BM, Myers SC. 2007. A theory of takeovers and disinvestment. J. Finance 62:809–45 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lambrecht BM, Myers SC. 2008. Debt and managerial rents in a real-options model of the firm. J. Financ. Econ 89:209–31 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lambrecht BM, Myers SC. 2012. A Lintner model of payout and managerial rents. J. Finance 67:1761–810 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lambrecht BM, Myers SC. 2015. The dynamics of investment, payout and debt Work. Pap., Judge Bus. Sch., Univ. Cambridge
  29. Leland HE. 1968. Saving and uncertainty: the precautionary demand for saving. Q. J. Econ 82:465–73 [Google Scholar]
  30. Leland HE. 1994. Corporate debt value, bond covenants, and optimal capital structure. J. Finance 49:1213–52 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lintner J. 1956. Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes. Am. Econ. Rev 46:97–113 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mauer DC, Triantis A. 1994. Interactions of corporate financing and investment decisions: a dynamic framework. J. Finance 49:1253–77 [Google Scholar]
  33. McDonald R, Siegel D. 1986. The value of waiting to invest. Q. J. Econ 101:707–27 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mello A, Parsons J. 1992. Measuring the agency cost of debt. J. Finance 47:1887–904 [Google Scholar]
  35. Merton RC. 1974. On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. J. Finance 29:449–70 [Google Scholar]
  36. Miao J, Wang N. 2007. Investment, consumption, and hedging under incomplete markets. J. Financ. Econ 86:608–42 [Google Scholar]
  37. Miller MH, Rock K. 1985. Dividend policy under asymmetric information. J. Finance 40:1031–51 [Google Scholar]
  38. Morck R, Yeung B, Yu W. 2000. The information content of stock markets: Why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements?. J. Financ. Econ 58:215–60 [Google Scholar]
  39. Morellec E. 2004. Can managerial discretion explain observed leverage ratios?. Rev. Financ. Stud 17:257–94 [Google Scholar]
  40. Morellec E, Nikolov B, Schürhoff N. 2012. Corporate governance and capital structure dynamics. J. Finance 67:803–48 [Google Scholar]
  41. Myers SC. 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. J. Financ. Econ 5:147–76 [Google Scholar]
  42. Myers SC. 2000. Outside equity. J. Finance 55:1005–37 [Google Scholar]
  43. Myers SC, Majd S. 1990. Abandonment value and project life. Advances in Futures and Options Research 4 F Fabozzi 1–21 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press [Google Scholar]
  44. Sannikov Y. 2008. A continuous-time version of the principal-agent problem. Rev. Econ. Stud 75:2957–84 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sannikov Y. 2013. Contracts: the theory of dynamic principal–agent relationships and the continuous-time approach. Advances in Economics and Econometrics, 10th World Congress 1 D Acemoglu, M Arellano, E Dekel 89–124 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  46. Shleifer A, Vishny RW. 1989. Management entrenchment: the case of manager-specific investments. J. Financ. Econ 25:123–39 [Google Scholar]
  47. Skinner D. 2008. The evolving relation between earnings, dividends, and stock repurchases. J. Financ. Econ 87:582–609 [Google Scholar]
  48. Stein J. 1989. Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: a model of myopic corporate behavior. Q. J. Econ 104:655–69 [Google Scholar]
  49. Strebulaev IA, Whited TM. 2012. Dynamic models and structural estimation in corporate finance. Found. Trends Finance 6:1–163 [Google Scholar]
  50. Stulz RM. 1990. Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. J. Financ. Econ 26:3–27 [Google Scholar]
  51. Zwiebel J. 1996. Dynamic capital structure under managerial entrenchment. Am. Econ. Rev 86:1197–215 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-121415-032937
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-121415-032937
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error