The Causes and Consequences of Genetic Interactions (Epistasis)

Literature Cited

1. 1.

   Aakre CD, Herrou J, Phung TN, Perchuk BS, Crosson S, Laub MT 2015. Evolving new protein-protein interaction specificity through promiscuous intermediates. Cell 163:594–606
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2.

   Ackers GK, Johnson AD, Shea MA 1982. Quantitative model for gene regulation by λ phage repressor. PNAS 79:1129–33
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3.

   Aguilar-Rodríguez J, Payne JL, Wagner A 2017. A thousand empirical adaptive landscapes and their navigability. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1:0045
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4.

   Anderson DW, McKeown AN, Thornton JW 2015. Intermolecular epistasis shaped the function and evolution of an ancient transcription factor and its DNA binding sites. eLife 4:e07864
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5.

   Araya CL, Fowler DM. 2011. Deep mutational scanning: assessing protein function on a massive scale. Trends Biotechnol 29:435–42
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6.

   Araya CL, Fowler DM, Chen W, Muniez I, Kelly JW, Fields S 2012. A fundamental protein property, thermodynamic stability, revealed solely from large-scale measurements of protein function. PNAS 109:16858–63
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7.

   Ashworth A, Lord CJ, Reis-Filho JS 2011. Genetic interactions in cancer progression and treatment. Cell 145:30–38
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8.

   Australo-Anglo-Am. Spondyloarthritis Consort., Wellcome Trust Case Control Consort. 2 Evans DM, Spencer CCA, Pointon JJ et al. 2011. Interaction between ERAP1 and HLA-B27 in ankylosing spondylitis implicates peptide handling in the mechanism for HLA-B27 in disease susceptibility. Nat. Genet. 43:761–67
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9.

   Baeza-Centurion P, Miñana B, Schiedel JM, Valcárcel J, Lehner B 2019. Combinatorial genetics reveals a scaling law for the effects of mutations on splicing. Cell 176:549–63
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10.

    Bandyopadhyay S, Mehta M, Kuo D, Sung M-K, Chuang R et al. 2010. Rewiring of genetic networks in response to DNA damage. Science 330:1385–89
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11.

    Bank C, Hietpas RT, Jensen JD, Bolon DNA 2015. A systematic survey of an intragenic epistatic landscape. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32:229–38
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12.

    Bank C, Hietpas RT, Wong A, Bolon DN, Jensen JD 2014. A Bayesian MCMC approach to assess the complete distribution of fitness effects of new mutations: uncovering the potential for adaptive walks in challenging environments. Genetics 196:841–52
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13.

    Bank C, Matuszewski S, Hietpas RT, Jensen JD 2016. On the (un)predictability of a large intragenic fitness landscape. PNAS 113:14085–90
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14.

    Bateson 1909. Discussion on the influence of heredity on disease, with special reference to tuberculosis, cancer, and diseases of the nervous system: introductory address. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 2:Gen. Rep.22–30
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15.

    Bloom JD, Gong LI, Baltimore D 2010. Permissive secondary mutations enable the evolution of influenza oseltamivir resistance. Science 328:1272–75
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16.

    Bloom JD, Labthavikul ST, Otey CR, Arnold FH 2006. Protein stability promotes evolvability. PNAS 103:5869–74
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17.

    Boj SF, Petrov D, Ferrer J 2010. Epistasis of transcriptomes reveals synergism between transcriptional activators Hnf1α and Hnf4α. PLOS Genet 6:e1000970
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18.

    Braun S, Enculescu M, Setty ST, Cortés-López M, de Almeida BP et al. 2018. Decoding a cancer-relevant splicing decision in the RON proto-oncogene using high-throughput mutagenesis. Nat. Commun. 9:3315
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19.

    Breen MS, Kemena C, Vlasov PK, Notredame C, Kondrashov FA 2012. Epistasis as the primary factor in molecular evolution. Nature 490:535–38
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20.

    Bridgham JT, Carroll SM, Thornton JW 2006. Evolution of hormone-receptor complexity by molecular exploitation. Science 312:97–101
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21.

    Burga A, Casanueva MO, Lehner B 2011. Predicting mutation outcome from early stochastic variation in genetic interaction partners. Nature 480:250–53
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22.

    Burga A, Lehner B. 2012. Beyond genotype to phenotype: why the phenotype of an individual cannot always be predicted from their genome sequence and the environment that they experience. FEBS J 279:3765–75
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23.

    Burga A, Lehner B. 2013. Predicting phenotypic variation from genotypes, phenotypes and a combination of the two. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 24:803–9
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24.

    Casanueva MO, Burga A, Lehner B 2012. Fitness trade-offs and environmentally induced mutation buffering in isogenic C. elegans. . Science 335:82–85
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25.

    Chou H-H, Delaney NF, Draghi JA, Marx CJ 2014. Mapping the fitness landscape of gene expression uncovers the cause of antagonism and sign epistasis between adaptive mutations. PLOS Genet 10:e1004149
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26.

    Corbett-Detig RB, Zhou J, Clark AG, Hartl DL, Ayroles JF 2013. Genetic incompatibilities are widespread within species. Nature 504:135–37
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27.

    Cortes A, Pulit SL, Leo PJ, Pointon JJ, Robinson PC et al. Major histocompatibility complex associations of ankylosing spondylitis are complex and involve further epistasis with ERAP1. Nat. Commun 6:7146
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28.

    Costanzo M, VanderSluis B, Koch EN, Baryshnikova A, Pons C et al. 2016. A global genetic interaction network maps a wiring diagram of cellular function. Science 353:aaf1420
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29.

    Daubner GM, Cléry A, Allain FH-T 2013. RRM-RNA recognition: NMR or crystallography…and new findings. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 23:100–8
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30.

    de Visser JAGM, Krug J 2014. Empirical fitness landscapes and the predictability of evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15:480–90
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31.

    Dekel E, Alon U. 2005. Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein. Nature 436:588–92
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32.

    Diss G, Lehner B. 2018. The genetic landscape of a physical interaction. eLife 7:e32472
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33.

    Dixon SJ, Andrews BJ, Boone C 2009. Exploring the conservation of synthetic lethal genetic interaction networks. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2:78–81
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34.

    Domingo J, Diss G, Lehner B 2018. Pairwise and higher-order genetic interactions during the evolution of a tRNA. Nature 558:117–21
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35.

    Dowell RD, Ryan O, Jansen A, Cheung D, Agarwala S et al. 2010. Genotype to phenotype: a complex problem. Science 328:469
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36.

    du Plessis L, Leventhal GE, Bonhoeffer S 2016. How good are statistical models at approximating complex fitness landscapes. ? Mol. Biol. Evol. 33:2454–68
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37.

    Eldar A, Elowitz MB. 2010. Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits. Nature 467:167–73
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38.

    Fischer B, Sandmann T, Horn T, Billmann M, Chaudhary V et al. 2015. A map of directional genetic interactions in a metazoan cell. eLife 4:e05464
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39.

    Fisher RA. 1919. XV.—The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 52:399–433
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40.

    Forsberg SKG, Bloom JS, Sadhu MJ, Kruglyak L, Carlborg Ö 2017. Accounting for genetic interactions improves modeling of individual quantitative trait phenotypes in yeast. Nat. Genet. 49:497–503
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41.

    Fowler DM, Araya CL, Fleishman SJ, Kellogg EH, Stephany JJ et al. 2010. High-resolution mapping of protein sequence-function relationships. Nat. Methods 7:741–46
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42.

    Gao L, Zhang J. 2003. Why are some human disease-associated mutations fixed in mice. ? Trends Genet 19:678–81
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43.

    Genet. Anal. Psoriasis Consort., Wellcome Trust Case Control Consort. 2 2010. A genome-wide association study identifies new psoriasis susceptibility loci and an interaction between HLA-C and ERAP1. Nat. Genet 42:985–90
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44.

    Gerke J, Lorenz K, Ramnarine S, Cohen B 2010. Gene-environment interactions at nucleotide resolution. PLOS Genet 6:e1001144
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45.

    Goodwin EB, Ellis RE. 2002. Turning clustering loops: sex determination in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol 12:R111–20
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46.

    Guy MP, Young DL, Payea MJ, Zhang X, Kon Y et al. 2014. Identification of the determinants of tRNA function and susceptibility to rapid tRNA decay by high-throughput in vivo analysis. Genes Dev 28:1721–32
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47.

    Haerd T, Dahlman K, Carlstedt-Duke J, Gustafsson JA, Rigler R 1990. Cooperativity and specificity in the interactions between DNA and the glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding domain. Biochemistry 29:5358–64
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48.

    Halabi N, Rivoire O, Leibler S, Ranganathan R 2009. Protein sectors: evolutionary units of three-dimensional structure. Cell 138:774–86
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49.

    Harms MJ, Thornton JW. 2014. Historical contingency and its biophysical basis in glucocorticoid receptor evolution. Nature 512:203–7
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50.

    Harrison R, Papp B, Pál C, Oliver SG, Delneri D 2007. Plasticity of genetic interactions in metabolic networks of yeast. PNAS 104:2307–12
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51.

    Hayden EJ, Bendixsen DP, Wagner A 2015. Intramolecular phenotypic capacitance in a modular RNA molecule. PNAS 112:12444–49
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52.

    Hayden EJ, Ferrada E, Wagner A 2011. Cryptic genetic variation promotes rapid evolutionary adaptation in an RNA enzyme. Nature 474:92–95
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53.

    Hietpas RT, Bank C, Jensen JD, Bolon DNA 2013. Shifting fitness landscapes in response to altered environments. Evolution 67:3512–22
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54.

    Hinkley T, Martins J, Chappey C, Haddad M, Stawiski E et al. 2011. A systems analysis of mutational effects in HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase. Nat. Genet. 43:487–89
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55.

    Hopf TA, Colwell LJ, Sheridan R, Rost B, Sander C, Marks DS 2012. Three-dimensional structures of membrane proteins from genomic sequencing. Cell 149:1607–21
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56.

    Horlbeck MA, Xu A, Wang M, Bennett NK, Park CY et al. 2018. Mapping the genetic landscape of human cells. Cell 174:953–67.e22
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57.

    Horovitz A. 1996. Double-mutant cycles: a powerful tool for analyzing protein structure and function. Fold. Des. 1:R121–26
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58.

    Hu X, Deutsch AJ, Lenz TL, Onengut-Gumuscu S, Han B et al. 2015. Additive and interaction effects at three amino acid positions in HLA-DQ and HLA-DR molecules drive type 1 diabetes risk. Nat. Genet. 47:898–905
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59.

    Int. Mult. Scler. Genet. Consort 2015. Class II HLA interactions modulate genetic risk for multiple sclerosis. Nat. Genet 47:1107–13
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60.

    Ives JAL, Carr JA, Mendel DB, Tai CY, Lambkin R et al. 2002. The H274Y mutation in the influenza A/H1N1 neuraminidase active site following oseltamivir phosphate treatment leave virus severely compromised both in vitro and in vivo. Antiviral Res 55:307–17
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61.

    Jolma A, Yan J, Whitington T, Toivonen J, Nitta KR et al. 2013. DNA-binding specificities of human transcription factors. Cell 152:327–39
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62.

    Jordan DM, Frangakis SG, Golzio C, Cassa CA, Kurtzberg J et al. 2015. Identification of cis-suppression of human disease mutations by comparative genomics. Nature 524:225–29
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63.

    Julien P, Miñana B, Baeza-Centurion P, Valcárcel J, Lehner B 2016. The complete local genotype-phenotype landscape for the alternative splicing of a human exon. Nat. Commun. 7:11558
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64.

    Kacser H, Burns JA. 1981. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics 97:639–66
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65.

    Kammenga JE. 2017. The background puzzle: how identical mutations in the same gene lead to different disease symptoms. FEBS J 284:3362–73
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66.

    Ke S, Shang S, Kalachikov SM, Morozova I, Yu L et al. 2011. Quantitative evaluation of all hexamers as exonic splicing elements. Genome Res 21:1360–74
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67.

    Kelleher AD, Long C, Holmes EC, Allen RL, Wilson J et al. 2001. Clustered mutations in HIV-1 gag are consistently required for escape from HLA-B27-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses. J. Exp. Med. 193:375–86
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68.

    Kemble HE, Eisenhauer C, Couce A, Chapron A, Magnan M et al. 2018. Flux, toxicity and protein expression costs shape genetic interaction in a metabolic pathway. bioRxiv 362327. https://doi.org/10.1101/362327
    [Crossref]
69. 69.

    Keren L, Hausser J, Lotan-Pompan M, Vainberg Slutskin I, Alisar H et al. 2016. Massively parallel interrogation of the effects of gene expression levels on fitness. Cell 166:1282–94.e18
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70.

    Kiel C, Verschueren E, Yang J-S, Serrano L 2013. Integration of protein abundance and structure data reveals competition in the ErbB signaling network. Sci. Signal. 6:ra109
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71.

    Kirino Y, Bertsias G, Ishigatsubo Y, Mizuki N, Tugal-Tutkun I 2013. Genome-wide association analysis identifies new susceptibility loci for Behçet's disease and epistasis between HLA-B^*51 and ERAP1. Nat. Genet 45:202–7
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72.

    Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev S, Kondrashov FA 2002. Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities in protein evolution. PNAS 99:14878–83
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73.

    Kondrashov FA, Kondrashov AS. 2001. Multidimensional epistasis and the disadvantage of sex. PNAS 98:12089–92
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74.

    Kryazhimskiy S, Dushoff J, Bazykin GA, Plotkin JB 2011. Prevalence of epistasis in the evolution of influenza A surface proteins. PLOS Genet 7:e1001301
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75.

    Kuzmin E, VanderSluis B, Wang W, Tan G, Deshpande R et al. 2018. Systematic analysis of complex genetic interactions. Science 360:eaao1729
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76.

    Lalić J, Elena SF. 2013. Epistasis between mutations is host-dependent for an RNA virus. Biol. Lett. 9:20120396
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77.

    Laufer C, Fischer B, Billmann M, Huber W, Boutros M 2013. Mapping genetic interactions in human cancer cells with RNAi and multiparametric phenotyping. Nat. Methods 10:427–31
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78.

    Laufer C, Fischer B, Huber W, Boutros M 2014. Measuring genetic interactions in human cells by RNAi and imaging. Nat. Protoc. 9:2341–53
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79.

    Lehner B. 2011. Molecular mechanisms of epistasis within and between genes. Trends Genet 27:323–31
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80.

    Lehner B. 2013. Genotype to phenotype: lessons from model organisms for human genetics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14:168–78
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81.

    Lehner B, Crombie C, Tischler J, Fortunato A, Fraser AG 2006. Systematic mapping of genetic interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans identifies common modifiers of diverse signaling pathways. Nat. Genet. 38:896–903
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82.

    Lenz TL, Deutsch AJ, Han B, Hu X, Okada Y et al. 2015. Widespread non-additive and interaction effects within HLA loci modulate the risk of autoimmune diseases. Nat. Genet. 47:1085–90
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83.

    Lewontin RC. 1974. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change New York: Columbia Univ. Press
84. 84.

    Li C, Qian W, Maclean CJ, Zhang J 2016. The fitness landscape of a tRNA gene. Science 352:837–40
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85.

    Li C, Zhang J. 2018. Multi-environment fitness landscapes of a tRNA gene. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2:1025–32
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86.

    Li X, Lalic C, Baeza-Centurion P, Dhar R, Lehner B 2019. Changes in gene expression shift and switch genetic interactions. bioRxiv 578419. https://doi.org/10.1101/578419
    [Crossref]
87. 87.

    Lunzer M, Miller SP, Felsheim R, Dean AM 2005. The biochemical architecture of an ancient adaptive landscape. Science 310:499–501
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88.

    Mackay TFC, Moore JH. 2014. Why epistasis is important for tackling complex human disease genetics. Genome Med 6:42
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89.

    Mani R, St. Onge RP, Hartman JL IV, Giaever G, Roth FP. 2008. Defining genetic interaction. PNAS 105:3461–66
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90.

    Marks DS, Colwell LJ, Sheridan R, Hopf TA, Pagnani A et al. 2011. Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation. PLOS ONE 6:e28766
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91.

    Marks DS, Hopf TA, Sander C 2012. Protein structure prediction from sequence variation. Nat. Biotechnol. 30:1072–80
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92.

    Matzaraki V, Kumar V, Wijmenga C, Zhernakova A 2017. The MHC locus and genetic susceptibility to autoimmune and infectious diseases. Genome Biol 18:76
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93.

    McKeown AN, Bridgham JT, Anderson DW, Murphy MN, Ortlund EA, Thornton JW 2014. Evolution of DNA specificity in a transcription factor family produced a new gene regulatory module. Cell 159:58–68
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94.

    McLaughlin RN Jr, Poelwijk FJ, Raman A, Gosal WS, Ranganathan R. 2012. The spatial architecture of protein function and adaptation. Nature 491:138–42
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95.

    McLornan DP, List A, Mufti GJ 2014. Applying synthetic lethality for the selective targeting of cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 371:1725–35
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96.

    Megiorni F, Pizzuti A. 2012. HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1 in celiac disease predisposition: practical implications of the HLA molecular typing. J. Biomed. Sci. 19:88
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97.

    Melamed D, Young DL, Gamble CE, Miller CR, Fields S 2013. Deep mutational scanning of an RRM domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae poly(A)-binding protein. RNA 19:1537–51
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98.

    Morcos F, Pagnani A, Lunt B, Bertolino A, Marks DS et al. 2011. Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. PNAS 108:E1293–301
    [Google Scholar]
99. 99.

    Morgunova E, Taipale J. 2017. Structural perspective of cooperative transcription factor binding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 47:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100.

     Morgunova E, Yin Y, Das PK, Jolma A, Zhu F et al. 2018. Two distinct DNA sequences recognized by transcription factors represent enthalpy and entropy optima. eLife 7:e32963
     [Google Scholar]
101. 101.

     Moscona A. 2009. Global transmission of oseltamivir-resistant influenza. N. Engl. J. Med. 360:953–56
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102.

     Mukherjee S, Berger MF, Jona G, Wang XS, Muzzey D et al. 2004. Rapid analysis of the DNA-binding specificities of transcription factors with DNA microarrays. Nat. Genet. 36:1331–39
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103.

     Mullis MN, Matsui T, Schell R, Foree R, Ehrenreich IM 2018. The complex underpinnings of genetic background effects. Nat. Commun. 9:3548
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104.

     Nijman SMB, Friend SH. 2013. Potential of the synthetic lethality principle. Science 342:809–11
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105.

     Olson CA, Wu NC, Sun R 2014. A comprehensive biophysical description of pairwise epistasis throughout an entire protein domain. Curr. Biol. 24:2643–51
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106.

     Ortlund EA, Bridgham JT, Redinbo MR, Thornton JW 2007. Crystal structure of an ancient protein: evolution by conformational epistasis. Science 317:1544–48
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107.

     Otwinowski J. 2018. Biophysical inference of epistasis and the effects of mutations on protein stability and function. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35:2345–54
     [Google Scholar]
108. 108.

     Otwinowski J, McCandlish DM, Plotkin JB 2018. Inferring the shape of global epistasis. PNAS 115:E7550–58
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109.

     Otwinowski J, Nemenman I. 2013. Genotype to phenotype mapping and the fitness landscape of the E. coli lac promoter. PLOS ONE 8:e61570
     [Google Scholar]
110. 110.

     Otwinowski J, Plotkin JB. 2014. Inferring fitness landscapes by regression produces biased estimates of epistasis. PNAS 111:E2301–9
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111.

     Palmer AC, Toprak E, Baym M, Kim S, Veres A et al. 2015. Delayed commitment to evolutionary fate in antibiotic resistance fitness landscapes. Nat. Commun. 6:7385
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112.

     Park S, Lehner B. 2015. Cancer type-dependent genetic interactions between cancer driver alterations indicate plasticity of epistasis across cell types. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11:824
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113.

     Patwardhan RP, Hiatt JB, Witten DM, Kim MJ, Smith RP et al. 2012. Massively parallel functional dissection of mammalian enhancers in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 30:265–70
     [Google Scholar]
114. 114.

     Phillips PC. 2008. Epistasis—the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9:855–67
     [Google Scholar]
115. 115.

     Poelwijk FJ, Kiviet DJ, Weinreich DM, Tans SJ 2007. Empirical fitness landscapes reveal accessible evolutionary paths. Nature 445:383–86
     [Google Scholar]
116. 116.

     Poelwijk FJ, Socolich M, Ranganathan R 2017. Learning the pattern of epistasis linking genotype and phenotype in a protein. bioRxiv 213835. https://doi.org/10.1101/213835
     [Crossref]
117. 117.

     Pokusaeva V, Usmanova D, Putintseva E, Espinar L, Sarkisyan K et al. 2019. An experimental assay of the interactions of amino acids from orthologous sequences shaping a complex fitness landscape. PLOS Genet15:e1008079
118. 118.

     Poon A, Chao L. 2005. The rate of compensatory mutation in the DNA bacteriophage ϕX174. Genetics 170:989–99
     [Google Scholar]
119. 119.

     Povolotskaya IS, Kondrashov FA. 2010. Sequence space and the ongoing expansion of the protein universe. Nature 465:922–26
     [Google Scholar]
120. 120.

     Presgraves DC. 2007. Speciation genetics: epistasis, conflict and the origin of species. Curr. Biol. 17:R125–27
     [Google Scholar]
121. 121.

     Puchta O, Cseke B, Czaja H, Tollervey D, Sanguinetti G, Kudla G 2016. Network of epistatic interactions within a yeast snoRNA. Science 352:840–44
     [Google Scholar]
122. 122.

     Raj A, van Oudenaarden A 2008. Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell 135:216–26
     [Google Scholar]
123. 123.

     Raman AS, White KI, Ranganathan R 2016. Origins of allostery and evolvability in proteins: a case study. Cell 166:468–80
     [Google Scholar]
124. 124.

     Ranganathan S. 1999. A technique for prediction of carbonitride precipitation in high strength low alloy steels. Mater. Sci. Technol. 15:523–26
     [Google Scholar]
125. 125.

     Rauscher B, Heigwer F, Henkel L, Hielscher T, Voloshanenko O, Boutros M 2018. Toward an integrated map of genetic interactions in cancer cells. Mol. Syst. Biol. 14:e7656
     [Google Scholar]
126. 126.

     Remold SK, Lenski RE. 2004. Pervasive joint influence of epistasis and plasticity on mutational effects in Escherichia coli. Nat. Genet 36:423–26
     [Google Scholar]
127. 127.

     Rich MS, Payen C, Rubin AF, Ong GT, Sanchez MR et al. 2016. Comprehensive analysis of the SUL1 promoter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. . Genetics 203:191–202
     [Google Scholar]
128. 128.

     Roguev A, Bandyopadhyay S, Zofall M, Zhang K, Fischer T et al. 2008. Conservation and rewiring of functional modules revealed by an epistasis map in fission yeast. Science 322:405–10
     [Google Scholar]
129. 129.

     Rollins NJ, Brock KP, Poelwijk FJ, Stiffler MA, Gauthier NP et al. 2019. Inferring protein 3D structure from deep mutation scans. Nat. Genet In press. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0432-9
     [Crossref]
130. 130.

     Russell RJ, Haire LF, Stevens DJ, Collins PJ, Lin YP et al. 2006. The structure of H5N1 avian influenza neuraminidase suggests new opportunities for drug design. Nature 443:45–49
     [Google Scholar]
131. 131.

     Sackton TB, Hartl DL. 2016. Genotypic context and epistasis in individuals and populations. Cell 166:279–87
     [Google Scholar]
132. 132.

     Sailer ZR, Harms MJ. 2017. Detecting high-order epistasis in nonlinear genotype-phenotype maps. Genetics 205:1079–88
     [Google Scholar]
133. 133.

     Sailer ZR, Harms MJ. 2017. High-order epistasis shapes evolutionary trajectories. PLOS Comput. Biol. 13:e1005541
     [Google Scholar]
134. 134.

     Salignon J, Richard M, Fulcrand E, Duplus-Bottin H, Yvert G 2018. Genomics of cellular proliferation in periodic environmental fluctuations. Mol. Syst. Biol. 14:e7823
     [Google Scholar]
135. 135.

     Salinas VH, Ranganathan R. 2018. Coevolution-based inference of amino acid interactions underlying protein function. eLife 7:e34300
     [Google Scholar]
136. 136.

     Sarkisyan KS, Bolotin DA, Meer MV, Usmanova DR, Mishin AS et al. 2016. Local fitness landscape of the green fluorescent protein. Nature 533:397–401
     [Google Scholar]
137. 137.

     Schmiedel JM, Lehner B. 2019. Determining protein structures using deep mutagenesis. Nat. Genet In press. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0431-x
     [Crossref]
138. 138.

     Segrè D, Deluna A, Church GM, Kishony R 2005. Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism. Nat. Genet. 37:77–83
     [Google Scholar]
139. 139.

     Shah P, McCandlish DM, Plotkin JB 2015. Contingency and entrenchment in protein evolution under purifying selection. PNAS 112:E3226–35
     [Google Scholar]
140. 140.

     Shendure J, Akey JM. 2015. The origins, determinants, and consequences of human mutations. Science 349:1478–83
     [Google Scholar]
141. 141.

     Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Khan MA, Braun J 2006. Concepts and epidemiology of spondyloarthritis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 20:401–17
     [Google Scholar]
142. 142.

     Sorrells TR, Booth LN, Tuch BB, Johnson AD 2015. Intersecting transcription networks constrain gene regulatory evolution. Nature 523:361–65
     [Google Scholar]
143. 143.

     Starr TN, Flynn JM, Mishra P, Bolon DNA, Thornton JW 2018. Pervasive contingency and entrenchment in a billion years of Hsp90 evolution. PNAS 115:4453–58
     [Google Scholar]
144. 144.

     Starr TN, Picton LK, Thornton JW 2017. Alternative evolutionary histories in the sequence space of an ancient protein. Nature 549:409–13
     [Google Scholar]
145. 145.

     Sternberg PW, Robert Horvitz H 1989. The combined action of two intercellular signaling pathways specifies three cell fates during vulval induction in C. elegans. . Cell 58:679–93
     [Google Scholar]
146. 146.

     Stiffler MA, Hekstra DR, Ranganathan R 2015. Evolvability as a function of purifying selection in TEM-1 β-lactamase. Cell 160:882–92
     [Google Scholar]
147. 147.

     Storz JF. 2018. Compensatory mutations and epistasis for protein function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 50:18–25
     [Google Scholar]
148. 148.

     Thomas JH, Birnby DA, Vowels JJ 1993. Evidence for parallel processing of sensory information controlling dauer formation in Caenorhabditis elegans. . Genetics 134:1105–17
     [Google Scholar]
149. 149.

     Tischler J, Lehner B, Fraser AG 2008. Evolutionary plasticity of genetic interaction networks. Nat. Genet. 40:390–91
     [Google Scholar]
150. 150.

     Tokuriki N, Tawfik DS. 2009. Stability effects of mutations and protein evolvability. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 19:596–604
     [Google Scholar]
151. 151.

     Toprak E, Veres A, Michel J-B, Chait R, Hartl DL, Kishony R 2011. Evolutionary paths to antibiotic resistance under dynamically sustained drug selection. Nat. Genet. 44:101–5
     [Google Scholar]
152. 152.

     Weigt M, White RA, Szurmant H, Hoch JA, Hwa T 2009. Identification of direct residue contacts in protein-protein interaction by message passing. PNAS 106:67–72
     [Google Scholar]
153. 153.

     Weinreb C, Riesselman AJ, Ingraham JB, Gross T, Sander C, Marks DS 2016. 3D RNA and functional interactions from evolutionary couplings. Cell 165:963–75
     [Google Scholar]
154. 154.

     Weinreich DM. 2006. Darwinian evolution can follow only very few mutational paths to fitter proteins. Science 312:111–14
     [Google Scholar]
155. 155.

     Weinreich DM, Lan Y, Wylie CS, Heckendorn RB 2013. Should evolutionary geneticists worry about higher-order epistasis?. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 23:700–7
     [Google Scholar]
156. 156.

     Weinreich DM, Watson RA, Chao L 2005. Perspective: sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories. Evolution 59:1165–74
     [Google Scholar]
157. 157.

     Wu NC, Dai L, Anders Olson C, Lloyd-Smith JO, Sun R 2016. Adaptation in protein fitness landscapes is facilitated by indirect paths. eLife 5:e16965
     [Google Scholar]
158. 158.

     Wylie CS, Shakhnovich EI. 2011. A biophysical protein folding model accounts for most mutational fitness effects in viruses. PNAS 108:9916–21
     [Google Scholar]
159. 159.

     You L, Yin J. 2002. Dependence of epistasis on environment and mutation severity as revealed by in silico mutagenesis of phage t7. Genetics 160:1273–81
     [Google Scholar]
160. 160.

     Zhu C-T, Ingelmo P, Rand DM 2014. G×G×E for lifespan in Drosophila: mitochondrial, nuclear, and dietary interactions that modify longevity. PLOS Genet 10:e1004354
     [Google Scholar]
161. 161.

     Zuo Z, Roy B, Chang YK, Granas D, Stormo GD 2017. Measuring quantitative effects of methylation on transcription factor-DNA binding affinity. Sci Adv 3:eaao1799
     [Google Scholar]