Governing the Belongings of the Precariously Housed: A Critical Legal Geography

Literature Cited

1. Abbing H. 2018. Why Are Artists Poor?: The Exceptional Economy of the Arts Amsterdam: Amsterdam: Univ. Press
2. Abbotsford (City) v. Shantz 2015. BCSC 1909
3. Amster R. 2003. Patterns of exclusion: sanitizing space, criminalizing homelessness. Soc. Justice 30:1195–221
   [Google Scholar]
4. Amster R. 2008. Lost in Space: The Criminalization, Globalization, and Urban Ecology of Homelessness New York: LFB Sch. Publ .
5. Atuahene B. 2016. Dignity takings and dignity restoration: creating a new theoretical framework for understanding involuntary property loss and the remedies required. Law Soc. Inq. 41:4796–823
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bhandar B. 2018. Colonial Lives of Property: Law, Land, and Racial Regimes of Ownership Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
7. Blomley N. 1994. Law, Space, and the Geographies of Power New York: Guilford
8. Blomley N. 2009. Homelessness, rights and the delusions of property. Urban Geogr 30:6577–90
   [Google Scholar]
9. Blomley N. 2010. Rights of Passage—Sidewalks and the Regulation of Public Flow London: Routledge
10. Blomley N. 2020. Precarious territory: Property law, housing and the socio-spatial order. Antipode 52:126–57
    [Google Scholar]
11. Blomley N, Pérez N. 2018. Precarious property: access and territory. Access to Land Y Emerich, L St-Pierre Harvey 1–20 Montréal, Can.: Thémis Univ. Montr.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Boucher B. 2018. The homeless man in the driveway is a brilliant artist? How three stars of the outsider art fair were discovered. Artnet News Jan. 19. https://news.artnet.com/market/outsider-art-fair-2018-backstories-1202201
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bourgois P, Schonberg J. 2009. Righteous Dopefiend Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
14. Brady M. 2016. The lost effects of the Fourth Amendment: giving personal property due protection. Yale Law J 125:946–1017
    [Google Scholar]
15. Braverman I, Blomley N, Delaney D, Kedar A 2014. The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
16. Butler J. 2009. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? New York: Verso
17. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 1982. S 2, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act, c 11 (UK).
18. Chesnay C, Bellot C, Sylvestre M-E 2014. Judiciarisation des personnes itinérantes à Québec: une géographie des pratiques policières répressives au service de la revitalisation. ÉchoGéo 28:2–17
    [Google Scholar]
19. Chiland E. 2019. LA settles homeless property rights case. Curbed Los Angeles Mar. 6. https://la.curbed.com/2019/3/6/18253888/mitchell-settlement-los-angeles-homeless-property
    [Google Scholar]
20. Cleverley B. 2018. City of Victoria to pay $130,000 for storage lockers for homeless. Times Colonist Oct. 10. https://www.timescolonist.com/news/local/city-of-victoria-to-pay-130-000-for-storage-lockers-for-homeless-1.23457998
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cockburn PJL. 2018. The Politics of Dependence: Economic Parasites and Vulnerable Lives London: Palgrave Macmillan
22. Connecticut v. Mooney 218 Conn. 85 1991.
23. Coulter C. 2018. Vernon votes to rein in homeless by banning shopping carts in all public spaces. CBC July 25. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/vernon-votes-to-rein-in-homeless-by-banning-shopping-carts-in-all-public-spaces-1.4761169
    [Google Scholar]
24. Cresswell T. 1996. In Place/Out of Place: Geography, Ideology and Transgression Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
25. Crocker D, Johnson VM. 2010. Poverty, Regulation & Social Justice: Readings on the Criminalization of Poverty Winnipeg, Can.: Fernwood Publ.
26. CTV Ottawa 2016. The great bottle scavenging debate. CTV News April 26. https://ottawa.ctvnews.ca/the-great-bottle-scavenging-debate-1.2875935
    [Google Scholar]
27. Damon W, McNeil R, Milloy M-J 2018. Residential eviction predicts initiation of or relapse of crystal methamphetamine use among people who inject drugs: a prospective cohort study. J. Public Health 41:36–45
    [Google Scholar]
28. Daniels A. 2018. How (and why) to prevent live-in renters. storEDGE Aug. 5. https://www.storedge.com/how-and-why-to-prevent-live-in-renters
29. Davidson N. 2018. Property, well-being, and home: positive psychology and property law's foundations. Law and the Precarious Home: Socio-Legal Perspectives on the Home in Insecure Times H Carr, B Edgeworth, C Hunter 47–62 Oxford, UK: Hart Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Desmond M. 2016. Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City New York: Broadway Books
31. Dewey J. 1939. Theory of valuation. Int. Encycl. Unified Sci. 2:47–67
    [Google Scholar]
32. Dickson C. 2018. Storage solution for homeless people on the way in Kamloops. CBC News March 24. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/kamloops-homeless-storage-1.4590259
    [Google Scholar]
33. Dittmar H. 1992. The Social Psychology of Material Possessions: To Have Is To Be. New York: St. Martin's
    [Google Scholar]
34. Dozier D. 2019. Contested development: homeless property, police reform, and resistance in Skid Row, LA. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 43: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12724
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
35. Duneier M. 1999. Sidewalk New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
36. Egan K. 2018. A tenant's harsh homecoming—evicted, possessions in the dumpster. Ottawa Citizen Feb. 27
    [Google Scholar]
37. Eisenberg TS. 1993. Connecticut v. Mooney: Can a homeless person find privacy under a bridge. Pace Law Rev 13:229–67
    [Google Scholar]
38. Entman RM. 2004. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
39. Evans J. 2012. Supportive measures, enabling restraint: governing homeless ‘street drinkers’ in Hamilton, Canada. Soc. Cult. Geogr. 13:2185–200
    [Google Scholar]
40. Feinberg J. 2017. Bikes and shopping carts confiscated in Chilliwack shakedown. Chilliwack Progress June 16
    [Google Scholar]
41. Findlay K, Blomley N. 2020. (D)evaluation: the state mismanagement of Japanese Canadian personal property in the 1940s. Landscapes of Injustice: A New Perspective on Canada's Internment of Japanese Canadians J Stanger-Rosspp. 213–54 Montreal: McGill-Queens Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
42. Fleming T, Damon W, Collins AB, Czechaczek S, Boyd J, McNeil R 2019. Housing in crisis: a qualitative study of the socio-legal contexts of residential evictions in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside. Int. J. Drug Policy 71:169–77
    [Google Scholar]
43. Flynn A. 2016. Cycling and the city: performativity in local decision-making. Windsor Rev. Leg. Soc. Issues 37:98–117
    [Google Scholar]
44. Flynn A. 2018. A tale of two casinos: unequal spaces of local governance in Toronto's casino debates. J. Law Soc. Policy 30:75–99
    [Google Scholar]
45. Foucault M. 1991. Questions of method. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality G Burchell, C Gordon, P Miller 73–86 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
46. Garner BA 1999. Black's Law Dictionary St. Paul: West Group, 7th ed..
47. Gillespie K, Lawson V. 2017. “My dog is my home”: multispecies care and poverty politics in Los Angeles, California and Austin, Texas. Gend. Place Cult. 24:6774–93
    [Google Scholar]
48. Grauer P. 2018. B.C. civil-rights watchdog calls on Vernon councilors to reject shopping car ban. The Star Aug. 23. https://www.thestar.com/vancouver/2018/08/23/bc-civil-rights-watchdog-calls-on-vernon-councillors-to-reject-shopping-cart-ban.html
    [Google Scholar]
49. Grear A. 2013. Vulnerability, advanced global capitalism and co-symptomatic injustice: locating the vulnerable subject. Vulnerability: Reflections on a New Ethical Foundation for Law and Politics MA Fineman, A Grear 37–50 Farnham, UK: Ashgate
    [Google Scholar]
50. Haecherl J. 2017. Homelessness + self storage: how to be compassionate while preventing live-in renters. storEDGE Nov. 30. https://www.storedge.com/homelessness-and-self-storage
    [Google Scholar]
51. Hamill S. 2015. Common law property theory and jurisprudence in Canada. Queen's Law J 40:2679–703
    [Google Scholar]
52. Hawkins H, Cook I, Sacks S, Rawling E, Griffiths H et al. 2011. Organic public geographies: “making the connection.”. Antipode 43:3909–26
    [Google Scholar]
53. Herbert S. 1997. Policing Space: Territoriality and the Los Angeles Police Department Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
54. Herbert S, Beckett K. 2010. “This is home for us”: questioning banishment from the ground up. Soc. Cult. Geogr. 11:3231–45
    [Google Scholar]
55. Hohfeld W. 1913. Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Yale Law J 23:116–59
    [Google Scholar]
56. Honchariw D. 2017. Who does civil asset forfeiture target most? A review of LVMPD's forfeiture activities for Fiscal Year 2016 Rep., Nev. Policy Res. Inst Las Vegas, NV: https://www.npri.org/docLib/20170726_CompleteForfeitureReport.pdf
57. Honoré T. 1982. The Quest for Security: Employees, Tenants, Wives London: Steven and Sons
58. Hunt A, Wickham G. 1994. Foucault and Law: Toward a Sociology of Law as Governance Boulder, CO: Pluto
59. Ingraham C. 2015. Law enforcement took more stuff from people than burglars did last year. Washington Post Nov. 23. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/11/23/cops-took-more-stuff-from-people-than-burglars-did-last-year/
    [Google Scholar]
60. Irvine L. 2013. My Dog Always Eats First: Homeless People and Their Animals Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner Publ.
61. Kassis BG. 2013. Owning property without privacy: how Lavan v. City of Los Angeles offers increased Fourth Amendment protection to Skid Row's homeless. Loyola Los Angel. Law Rev. 46:1159–70
    [Google Scholar]
62. Katz L. 2017. Property's sovereignty. Theor. Inq. Law 18:2299–328
    [Google Scholar]
63. Kerr J. 2018. DTES advocates say increased police presence targets poor and homeless. Vancouver Courier Feb. 16. https://www.vancourier.com/news/dtes-advocates-say-increased-police-presence-targets-poor-and-homeless-1.23177405
    [Google Scholar]
64. Kidd A, Kidd R. 1994. Benefits and liabilities of pets for the homeless. Psychol. Rep. 74:715–22
    [Google Scholar]
65. Kornberger M, Justesen L, Madsen AK, Mouritsen J 2015. Making Things Valuable Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
66. Laanela M. 2017. U-Haul evicted man living in Vancouver storage locker. CBC Jan. 13. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/uhaul-storage-locker-home-1.3934535
    [Google Scholar]
67. Labrecque J, Walsh CA. 2011. Homeless women's voices on incorporating companion animals into shelter services. Anthrozoös 24:179–95
    [Google Scholar]
68. Lamont M. 2012. Towards a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 38:201–21
    [Google Scholar]
69. Lamont M, Beljean S, Clair M 2014. What is missing? Cultural processes and causal pathways to inequality. Socio-Econ. Rev. 12:573–608
    [Google Scholar]
70. Langegger S, Koester S. 2017. Moving on, finding shelter. Int. Sociol. 32:4454–73
    [Google Scholar]
71. Lavan v. City of Los Angeles, 693 F.3d 1022 (9th Cir 2012.
72. Leonetti C. 2019. The wild, wild west: the right of the unhoused to privacy in their encampments. Am. Crim. Law Rev. 56:2399–425
    [Google Scholar]
73. Lovey I. 2015. State of Insecurity: Government of the Precarious Brooklyn, NY: Verso
74. Marcus GE. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 24:95–117
    [Google Scholar]
75. Matsuda MJ. 1987. Looking to the bottom: critical legal studies and reparations. Harvard Civ. Rights-Civ. Lib. Law Rev. 22:323–99
    [Google Scholar]
76. Merry S. 2001. Spatial governmentality and the new urban social order. Am. Anthropol. 103:16–29
    [Google Scholar]
77. Metcalf C. 2015. The (ir)relevance of constitutional protection for property rights? Compensation for takings in Canada and the United States. Univ. Tor. Law J. 65:3143–85
    [Google Scholar]
78. Metzger J, Wiberg S. 2018. Contested framings of urban qualities: dis/qualifications of value in urban development controversies. Urban Stud 55:102300–16
    [Google Scholar]
79. Miller D. 2010. Stuff Cambridge: Polity
80. Mitchell D. 1997. The annihilation of space by law: the roots and implications of anti-homelessness laws in the United States. Antipode 29:3303–37
    [Google Scholar]
81. Mol A. 1999. Ontological politics: a word and some questions. Sociol. Rev. 47:S174–89
    [Google Scholar]
82. Nanaimo (City) v. Courtoreille 2018. BCSC 1629
83. Nedelsky J. 1990. Law, boundaries and the bounded self. Representations 30:162–89
    [Google Scholar]
84. O'Mahoney LF. 2014. Property outsiders and the hidden politics of doctrinalism. Curr. Leg. Probl. 67:1409–45
    [Google Scholar]
85. Ouellette L. 2017. Bare enterprise: US television and the business of dispossession (postcrisis, gender and property television). Eur. J. Cult. Stud. 20:5490–508
    [Google Scholar]
86. Pable J. 2013. Possessions in the homeless shelter experience: the built environment's potential role in self-restoration. Interiors 4:3267–94
    [Google Scholar]
87. Parizeau K, Lepawsky J. 2015. Legal orderings of waste in built spaces. Int. J. Law Built Environ. 7:121–38
    [Google Scholar]
88. Pauly B, Gagnon M. 2018. Injunctions to shut down tent cities are no solution. The Tyee July 31. https://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2018/07/31/Injunctions-Shut-Down-Tent-Cities-No-Solution/
    [Google Scholar]
89. Peñalver EM. 2011. Property's memories. Fordham Law Rev 80:1071–88
    [Google Scholar]
90. Peñalver EM, Katyal SK. 2007. Property outlaws. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 155:1095–186
    [Google Scholar]
91. Pivot Legal Soc 2018. Project Inclusion Report: Confronting Anti-Homeless & Anti-Substance User Stigma in British Columbia Vancouver, Can: Pivot Legal Soc.
92. Power ER. 2017. Renting with pets: A pathway to housing insecurity. Hous. Stud. 32:3336–60
    [Google Scholar]
93. R v. Picard 2018. BCPC 344
94. Radin M. 1993. Reinterpreting Property Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
95. Ranasinghe P. 2018. Helter-Shelter: Security, Legality, and an Ethic of Care in an Emergency Shelter Toronto, Can.: Univ. Tor. Press
96. Roark ML. 2017. Under-propertied persons. Cornell J. Law Public Policy 28:11–64
    [Google Scholar]
97. Rock M, Degeling C. 2013. Public health ethics and a status for pets as persons-things: revisiting the place of animals in urbanized societies. Bioeth. Inq. 10:485–95
    [Google Scholar]
98. Rose N, Valverde M. 1998. Governed by law. Soc. Leg. Stud. 7:4541–51
    [Google Scholar]
99. Roy A. 2017. Dis/possessive collectivism: property and personhood at city's end. Geoforum 80:A1–A11
    [Google Scholar]
100. Saanich (District) v. Brett 2018. BCSC 1648
101. Shannon K, Rusch M, Shoveller J, Alexson D, Gibson K, Tyndal M 2008. Mapping violence and policing as an environmental-structural barrier to health service and syringe availability among substance-using women in street-level sex work. Int. J. Drug Policy 19:140–47
     [Google Scholar]
102. Stanger-Ross J, Blomley N 2017. “This land is worth a million dollars”: property, restitution, and reductivism in the dispossession of Japanese Canadians. Law Hist. Rev 35:3711–51
     [Google Scholar]
103. Stern SM, Lewinsohn-Zamir D. 2020. The Psychology of Property Law New York: N.Y. Univ. Press
104. Streitfeld D. 2008. Losing a home, then losing all out of storage. New York Times May 11. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/11/business/11storage.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
     [Google Scholar]
105. Srinivasan K. 2013. The biopolitics of animal being and welfare: dog control and care in the UK and India. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 38:106–19
     [Google Scholar]
106. Sullivan E. 2018. Dignity takings and “trailer trash”: the case of mobile home park mass evictions. Chicago-Kent Law Rev 92:937–59
     [Google Scholar]
107. Sutter G. 2015. Rental housing dynamics and lower-income neighbourhoods in Canada Res. Pap. 235, Neighb. Change Res. Partnersh Vancouver, Can:.
108. Sylvestre M-E, Bellot C, Ménard PAC, Tremblay A 2011. Le droit est aussi une question de visibilité: occupation des espaces publics et parcours judiciaires des personnes itinérantes à Montréal et à Ottawa. Can. J. Law Soc. 26:3531–61
     [Google Scholar]
109. Sylvestre M-E, Blomley N, Bellot C 2020. Red Zones: Criminal Law and the Territorial Governance of Marginalized People Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
110. Sylvestre M-E, Blomley N, Damon W, Bellot C 2015. Court-imposed spatial tactics and the politics of legal technicalities. Antipode 47:51346–66
     [Google Scholar]
111. Sylvestre M-E, Ménard FV, Fortin V, Bellot C, Blomley N 2018. Conditions géographiques de mise en liberté et de probation imposées aux manifestants: une atteinte injustifiée au droit à la liberté d'expression, de réunion pacifique et d'association. McGill Law J 62:4923–73
     [Google Scholar]
112. Taylor H, Williams P, Gray D 2004. Homelessness and dog ownership: an investigation into animal empathy, attachment, crime, drug use, health and public opinion. Anthrozoös 17:4353–68
     [Google Scholar]
113. Toohey AM, Krahn TM. 2018. “Simply to be let in”: opening the doors to lower-income older adults and their companion animals. J. Public Health 40:3661–65
     [Google Scholar]
114. Turcato M. 2018. City administration advises against Vernon shopping cart ban. Global News Sep. 2. https://globalnews.ca/news/4423596/city-against-vernon-shopping-cart-ban/
     [Google Scholar]
115. Valverde M. 2011. Seeing like a city: the dialectic of modern and premodern ways of seeing in urban governance. Law Soc. Rev. 45:2277–312
     [Google Scholar]
116. van der Walt AJ. 2009. Property in the Margins Oxford, UK: Hart
117. van der Walt AJ. 2010. Property and marginality. Property and Community G Alexander, E Peñalver 81–105 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
118. Vancouver Board of Parks & Recreation v. Mickelson 2003. BCSC 1271
119. Vancouver (City) v. Wallstam 2017. BCSC 917
120. Vasudevan A. 2015. The makeshift city: towards a global geography of squatting. Prog. Hum. Geogr 39:3338–59
     [Google Scholar]
121. Victoria (City) v. Adams 2009. BCCA 563
122. Walby K, Lippert R. 2011. Spatial regulation, dispersal, and the aesthetics of the city: conservation office policing of homeless people in Ottawa, Canada. Antipode 44:31015–33
     [Google Scholar]
123. Waldron J. 1990. Homelessness and the issue of freedom. UCLA Law Rev 39:295–324
     [Google Scholar]
124. Wasserman J, Clair J. 2011. Housing patterns of homeless people: the ecology of the street in an era of urban renewal. J. Contemp. Ethnogr. 40:171–101
     [Google Scholar]
125. Weiser L, Treu M. 2008. Adding injury to injury: inadequate protection of tenants' property during eviction and the need for reform. Loyola Consum. Law Rev. 20:3247–69
     [Google Scholar]
126. Werb DEW, Small W, Strathdee S, Li K, Montaner J, Kerr T 2008. Effects of police confiscation of illicit drugs and syringes among injection drug users in Vancouver. Int. J. Drug Policy 19:4332–38
     [Google Scholar]
127. Wexler S. 1970. Practicing law for poor people. Yale Law J 79:1049–67
     [Google Scholar]
128. Wilhelm T. 2019. For Windsor's homeless, taking shelter can mean leaving belongings behind. Toronto Star Feb. 1. https://windsorstar.com/news/local-news/for-windsors-homeless-taking-shelter-can-mean-leaving-belongings-behind
     [Google Scholar]
129. Ziff B. 2018. Principles of Property Law Toronto, Can.: Carswell, 7th ed..
130. Zimmerman LJ, Welch J. 2011. Displaced and barely visible: archaeology and the culture of homelessness. Hist. Archaeol. 45:167–85
     [Google Scholar]