The Impact of Experienced and Expressed Emotion on Legal Factfinding

Literature Cited

1. Alicke M. 2000. Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychol. Bull. 126:556–74
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anderson CA, Shibuya A, Ihori N. 2010. Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in eastern and western countries: a meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 136:151–73
   [Google Scholar]
3. Anleu SR, Mack K. 2005. Magistrates’ everyday work and emotional labour. J. Law Soc. 32:4590–614
   [Google Scholar]
4. Antonio ME, Arone NE. 2005. Damned if they do, damned if they don't: jurors’ reaction to defendant testimony or silence during a capital trial. Judicature 89:60–66
   [Google Scholar]
5. Archer RL, Foushee HC, Davis MH, Aderman D. 1979. Emotional empathy in a courtroom simulation: a person-situation interaction. J. Appl. Soc. Pyschol. 9:3275–91
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ask K, Landstrom S. 2010. Why emotions matter: Expectancy violation and affective response mediate the emotional victim effect. Law Hum. Behav. 10:392–401
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ask K, Pina A. 2011. On being angry and punitive: how anger alters perception of criminal intent. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 2:5494–99
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bandes S. 1999. When victims seek closure: forgiveness, vengeance and the role of government. Fordham Urb. Law J. 27:1599–606
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bandes SA. 2016. Remorse and criminal justice. Emot. Rev. 8:114–19
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bandes SA, Salerno JM. 2014. Emotion, proof, and prejudice: the cognitive science of gruesome photos and victim impact statements. Ariz. State Law J. 46:1003–56
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bastian B, Denson TF, Haslam N. 2013. The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice. PLOS ONE 8:4e61842
    [Google Scholar]
12. Block SD, Greenberg SN, Goodman GS. 2009. Remembrance of eyewitness testimony: effects of emotional content, self-relevance, and emotional tone. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 39:122859–78
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bloom P. 2006. Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion New York: Ecco:
14. Boat BW, Everson MD. 1988. Use of anatomical dolls among professionals in sexual abuse evaluations. Child Abuse Neglect 12:2171–79
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bodenhausen GV, Sheppard LA, Kramer GP. 1994. Negative affect and social judgment: the differential impact of anger and sadness. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 24:45–62
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bond C, Atoum A, Pitre U, Lashley B, Skaggs L, Kirk C. 1993. Fishy-looking liars: deception judgment from expectancy violation. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol 63:969–77
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bornstein BH, Rung LM, Miller MK. 2002. The effects of defendant remorse on mock juror decisions in a malpractice case. Behav. Sci. Law. 20:4393–409
    [Google Scholar]
18. Brescoll VL, Uhlmann EL. 2008. Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace. Psychol. Sci. 19:3268–75
    [Google Scholar]
19. Bright DA, Goodman-Delahunty J. 2006. Gruesome evidence and emotion: anger, blame, and jury decision-making. Law Hum. Behav. 30:2183–202
    [Google Scholar]
20. Bright DA, Goodman-Delahunty J. 2011. Mock juror decision making in a civil negligence trial: the impact of gruesome evidence injury severity, and information processing route. Psychiatry Psychol. Law. 18:439–59
    [Google Scholar]
21. Burgess AW, Holmstrom LL. 1974. Rape trauma syndrome. AJP 131:9981–86
    [Google Scholar]
22. Calanchini J, Moons WG, Mackie DM. 2016. Angry expressions induce extensive processing of persuasive appeals. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 64:88–98
    [Google Scholar]
23. Canli T, Zhao Z, Brewer J, Gabrieli JDE, Cahill L. 2000. Event-related activation in the human amygdala associates with later memory for individual emotional experience. J. Neurosci. 20:19RC99
    [Google Scholar]
24. Carlsmith K, Darley J, Robinson P 2002. Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 83:284–99
    [Google Scholar]
25. Castelli P, Goodman GS. 2014. Children's perceived emotional behavior at disclosure and prosecutors’ evaluations. Child Abuse Neglect 38:91521–32
    [Google Scholar]
26. Chamberlain J, Miller MK. 2008. Stress in the courtroom: call for research. Psychiatry Psychol. Law. 15:2237–50
    [Google Scholar]
27. Chapman H, Anderson A 2013. Things rank and gross in nature: a review and synthesis of moral disgust. Psychol. Bull. 139:2300–27
    [Google Scholar]
28. Cline VB, Croft RG, Courrier S. 1973. Desensitization of children to television violence. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 27:3360–65
    [Google Scholar]
29. Dahl J, Enemo I, Drevland GCB, Wessel E, Eilertsen DE, Magnussen S. 2007. Displayed emotions and witness credibility: a comparison of judgements by individuals and mock juries. Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 21:91145–55
    [Google Scholar]
30. Deffenbacher KA, Bornstein BH, Penrod SD, McGorty EK. 2004. A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law Hum. Behav. 28:6687–706
    [Google Scholar]
31. Devine PG, Forscher PS, Austin AJ, Cox WTL. 2012. Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: a prejudice habit-breaking intervention. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48:61267–78
    [Google Scholar]
32. Edwards E, Mottarella K. 2014. Preserving the right to a fair trial: an examination of prejudicial value of visual and auditory evidence. . N. Am. J. Psychol. 16:397–414
    [Google Scholar]
33. Edwards K, Bryan TS. 1997. Judgmental biases produced by instructions to disregard: the (paradoxical) case of emotional information. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 23:849–64
    [Google Scholar]
34. Engelken C, Peter-Hagene LC. 2020. Emotion suppression reduces the effect of graphic evidence on disgust and verdicts, but impairs jurors’ memory Presented at the Annual Meeting of Psychology-Law Society New Orleans, LA:
35. Fabes RA, Martin CL. 1991. Gender and age stereotypes of emotionality. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 17:5532–40
    [Google Scholar]
36. Feigenson N. 2016. Jurors’ emotions and judgments of legal responsibility and blame: What does the experimental research tell us?. Emot. Rev. 8:126–31
    [Google Scholar]
37. Feigenson N, Park J. 2006. Emotions and attributions of legal responsibility and blame: a research review. Law Hum. Behav. 30:2143–61
    [Google Scholar]
38. Finkelstein R, Bastounis M. 2010. The effect of the deliberation process and jurors’ prior legal knowledge on the sentence: the role of psychological expertise and crime scene photo. Behav. Sci. Law 28:3426–41
    [Google Scholar]
39. Forgas J. 1995. Mood and judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychol. Bull. 117:39–66
    [Google Scholar]
40. Gable P, Harmon-Jones E. 2010. The motivational dimensional model of affect: implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation. Cogn. Emot. 24:2322–37
    [Google Scholar]
41. Gazzo Castañeda LE, Knauff M. 2016. Defeasible reasoning with legal conditionals. Mem. Cogn. 44:3499–517
    [Google Scholar]
42. Georges LC, Wiener RL, Keller SR. 2013. The angry juror: sentencing decisions in first-degree murder. Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 27:2156–66
    [Google Scholar]
43. Giner-Sorolla R. 2012. Judging Passions: Moral Emotions in Persons and Groups Oxfordshire, UK: Taylor & Francis
44. Goldberg JH, Lerner JS, Tetlock PE. 1999. Rage and reason: the psychology of the intuitive prosecutor. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 29:781–95
    [Google Scholar]
45. Golding JM, Fryman HM, Marsil DF, Yozwiak JA. 2003. Big girls don't cry: the effect of child witness demeanor on juror decisions in a child sexual abuse trial. Child Abuse Neglect 27:111311–21
    [Google Scholar]
46. Goodman GS, Taub EP, Jones DPH, England P, Port LK et al. 1992. Testifying in criminal court: emotional effects on child sexual assault victims. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev 57:51–142
    [Google Scholar]
47. Grady RH, Reiser L, Garcia RJ, Koeu C, Scurich N. 2018. Impact of gruesome photographic evidence on legal decisions: a meta-analysis. Psychiatr. Psychol. Law 25:4503–21
    [Google Scholar]
48. Greene E, Koehring H, Quiat M. 1998. Victim impact evidence in capital cases: Does the victim's character matter?. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28:2145–56
    [Google Scholar]
49. Gross JJ. 1998. The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2:271–99
    [Google Scholar]
50. Gross JJ, Levenson RW. 1993. Emotional suppression: physiology, self-report, and expressive behavior. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 64:970–86
    [Google Scholar]
51. Gross JJ, Thompson RA 2007. Emotion regulation: conceptual foundations. Handbook of Emotion Regulation JJ Gross 3–24 New York: Guilford
    [Google Scholar]
52. Hackett L, Day A, Mohr P. 2008. Expectancy violation and perceptions of rape victim credibility. Leg. Criminol. Psychol. 13:2323–34
    [Google Scholar]
53. Haegerich TM, Bottoms BL. 2000. Empathy and jurors’ decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations. Law Hum. Behav. 24:421–48
    [Google Scholar]
54. Haidt J 2002. The moral emotions. Handbook of Affective Sciences RJ Davidson, KR Scherer, HH Goldsmith 852–70 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
55. Haney C, Sontag L, Costanzo S. 1994. Deciding to take a life: capital juries, sentencing instructions, and the jurisprudence of death. J. Soc. Issues 50:2149–76
    [Google Scholar]
56. Hareli S, Hess U. 2010. What emotional reactions can tell us about the nature of others: an appraisal perspective on person perception. Cogn. Emot. 24:1128–40
    [Google Scholar]
57. Heath WP. 2009. Arresting and convicting the innocent: the potential role of an “inappropriate” emotional display in the accused. Behav. Sci. Law 27:3313–32
    [Google Scholar]
58. Heerdink MW, van Kleef GA, Homan AC, Fischer AH. 2013. On the social influence of emotions in groups: interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on conformity versus deviance. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 105:2262–84
    [Google Scholar]
59. Horberg EJ, Keltner D, Oveis C, Cohen AB. 2009. Disgust and the moralization of purity. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 97:963–76
    [Google Scholar]
60. Jaffe PG, Crooks CV, Dunford-Jackson BL, Town JM. 2003. Vicarious trauma in judges: the personal challenge of dispensing justice. Juv. Fam. Court J. 54:41–9
    [Google Scholar]
61. Jehle A, Miller MK, Kemmelmeier M. 2009. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors’ judgments of offenders. Law Hum. Behav. 33:5393–404
    [Google Scholar]
62. Jones TM, Bottoms BL, Stevenson MC. 2020. Child victim empathy mediates the influence of jurors’ sexual abuse experiences on child sexual abuse case judgments: meta-analyses. Psychol. Public Policy Law 26:3312–32
    [Google Scholar]
63. Justice LV, Smith HMJ. 2018. Memory judgements: the contribution of detail and emotion to assessments of believability and reliability. Memory 26:101402–15
    [Google Scholar]
64. Kaplan RL, Van Damme I, Levine LJ, Loftus EF. 2016. Emotion and false memory. Emot. Rev. 8:18–13
    [Google Scholar]
65. Kassin SM, Garfield DA. 1991. Blood and guts: general and trial-specific effects of videotaped crime scenes on mock jurors. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 21:181459–72
    [Google Scholar]
66. Kaufmann G, Drevland GCB, Wessel E, Overskeid G, Magnussen S. 2003. The importance of being earnest: displayed emotions and witness credibility. Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 17:121–34
    [Google Scholar]
67. Keltner D, Ellsworth PC, Edwards K. 1993. Beyond simple pessimism: effects of sadness and anger on social perception. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol 64:740–52
    [Google Scholar]
68. Keltner D, Haidt J. 1999. Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cogn. Emot. 13:505–21
    [Google Scholar]
69. Koenigs M, Young L, Adolphs R, Tranel D, Cushman F et al. 2007. Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature 446:7138908–11
    [Google Scholar]
70. Landström S, Ask K, Sommar C, Willén R. 2015. Children's testimony and the emotional victim effect. Leg. Crim. Psychol. 20:2365–83
    [Google Scholar]
71. Laukka P, Elfenbein HA. 2012. Emotion appraisal dimensions can be inferred from vocal expressions. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci 3:5529–36
    [Google Scholar]
72. Lens KME, van Doorn J, Pemberton A, Bogaerts S. 2014. You shouldn't feel that way! Extending the emotional victim effect through the mediating role of expectancy violation. Psychol. Crime Law 20:4326–38
    [Google Scholar]
73. Lerner JS, Goldberg JH, Tetlock PE. 1998. Sober second thought: the effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 24:6563–74
    [Google Scholar]
74. Lerner JS, Tiedens LZ. 2006. Portrait of the angry decision maker: how appraisal tendencies shape anger's influence on cognition. J. Behav. Decis. Making 19:2115–37
    [Google Scholar]
75. Loewenstein G, Small DA. 2007. The Scarecrow and the Tin Man: the vicissitudes of human sympathy and caring. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 11:2112–26
    [Google Scholar]
76. Lonergan M, Leclerc M-È, Descamps M, Pigeon S, Brunet A. 2016. Prevalence and severity of trauma- and stressor-related symptoms among jurors: a review. J. Crim. Justice 47:51–61
    [Google Scholar]
77. Lotz S, Okimoto TG, Schlösser T, Fetchenhauer D. 2011. Punitive versus compensatory reactions to injustice: emotional antecedents to third-party interventions. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 47:2477–80
    [Google Scholar]
78. MacLin MK, Downs C, MacLin OH, Caspers HM. 2009. The effect of defendant facial expression on mock juror decision-making: the power of remorse. N. Am. J. Psychol. 11:323–32
    [Google Scholar]
79. Maroney TA. 2011. The persistent cultural script of judicial dispassion. Calif. Law Rev. 99:2629–81
    [Google Scholar]
80. Maroney TA. 2012. Angry judges. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 65:1207–86
    [Google Scholar]
81. Maroney TA, Gross JJ. 2014. The ideal of the dispassionate judge: an emotion regulation perspective. Emot. Rev. 6:2142–51
    [Google Scholar]
82. Matsuo K, Itoh Y. 2017. The effects of limiting instructions about emotional evidence depend on need for cognition. Psychiatry Psychol. Law 24:4516–29
    [Google Scholar]
83. McCracken EW, Stevenson MC. 2017. Rape perpetrator gender shapes liability judgments: implications for disgust and moral outrage. Transl. Issues Psychol. Sci. 3:2153–66
    [Google Scholar]
84. Myers JEB, Redlich AD, Goodman GS, Prizmich LP, Imwinkelried E. 1999. Jurors’ perceptions of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases. Psychol. Public Policy Law 5:2388–419
    [Google Scholar]
85. Nadler J. 2012. Blaming as a social process: the influence of character and moral emotion on blame. Law Contemp. Probl. 75:1–31
    [Google Scholar]
86. Nadler J, McDonnell M-HM. 2012. Moral character, motive, and the psychology of blame. Cornell Law Rev. 97:255–304
    [Google Scholar]
87. Nadler J, Rose MR. 2003. Victim impact testimony and the psychology of punishment. Cornell Law Rev 88:419–56
    [Google Scholar]
88. Nitschke FT, McKimmie BM, Vanman EJ. 2019. A meta-analysis of the emotional victim effect for female adult rape complainants: Does complainant distress influence credibility?. Psychol. Bull. 145:10953–79
    [Google Scholar]
89. Nuñez N, Schweitzer K, Chai CA, Myers B. 2015. Negative emotions felt during trial: the effect of fear, anger, and sadness on juror decision making. Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 29:2200–9
    [Google Scholar]
90. Ochsner KN, Phelps E. 2007. Emerging perspectives on emotion–cognition interactions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11:8317–18
    [Google Scholar]
91. Okimoto TG, Brescoll VL. 2010. The price of power: power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 36:7923–36
    [Google Scholar]
92. Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172 ( 1997.)
93. Oliver E, Griffitt W. 1976. Emotional arousal and “objective” judgment. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 8:5399–400
    [Google Scholar]
94. Palmer EA. 2005. Variables influencing the vicarious trauma of jurors in criminal cases. PsyD thesis Univ. North. Colo. Greeley, CO:
    [Google Scholar]
95. Paternoster R, Deise J. 2011. A heavy thumb on the scale: the effect of victim impact evidence on capital decision making. Criminology 49:1129–61
    [Google Scholar]
96. Payne JD, Nadel L, Britton WB, Jacobs WJ. 2004. The biopsychology of trauma and memory. Memory and Emotion76–128 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
97. Peter-Hagene LC, Bottoms BL. 2017. Attitudes, anger, and nullification instructions influence jurors’ verdicts in euthanasia cases. Psychol. Crime Law 23:10983–1009
    [Google Scholar]
98. Phalen HJ, Salerno JM, Peter-Hagene CL 2020. Emotional evidence in court. Research Handbook on Law and Emotion SA Bandes, JL Madeira, LF Niezer, KD Temple, E White 288–311 Res. Handb. Legal Theory Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
99. Proeve MJ, Howells K. 2006. Effects of remorse and shame and criminal justice experience on judgements about a sex offender. Psychol. Crime Law 12:2145–61
    [Google Scholar]
100. Regan PC, Baker SJ. 1998. The impact of child witness demeanor on perceived credibility and trial outcome in sexual abuse cases. J. Fam. Violence 13:187–95
     [Google Scholar]
101. Reisberg D, Heuer F. 2004. Memory for emotional events. Memory and Emotion Reisberg, P Hertel 3–41 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
102. Reisberg D, Heuer F 2007. The influence of emotion on memory in forensic settings. Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology, Vol. 1. Memory for Events MP Toglia, JD Read, DF Ross, RCL Lindsay 81–116 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Robertson N, Davies G, Nettleingham A. 2009. Vicarious traumatisation as a consequence of jury service. Howard J. Crim. Justice 48:11–12
     [Google Scholar]
104. Rose MR, Nadler J, Clark J 2006. Appropriately upset? Emotion norms and perceptions of crime victims. Law Hum. Behav. 30:203–19
     [Google Scholar]
105. Ruva CL, Guenther CC, Yarbrough A. 2011. Positive and negative pretrial publicity: the roles of impression formation, emotion, and predecisional distortion. Crim. Justice Behav. 38:5511–34
     [Google Scholar]
106. Salekin RT, Ogloff JRP, McFarland C, Rogers R 1995. Influencing jurors’ perceptions of guilt: expression of emotionality during testimony. Behav. Sci. Law 13:2293–305
     [Google Scholar]
107. Salerno JM. 2017. Seeing red: Disgust reactions to gruesome photographs in color (but not in black and white) increase convictions. Psychol. Public Policy Law 23:3336–50
     [Google Scholar]
108. Salerno JM, Bottoms BL. 2009. Emotional evidence and jurors’ judgments: the promise of neuroscience for informing psychology and law. Behav. Sci. Law 27:2273–96
     [Google Scholar]
109. Salerno JM, Murphy MC, Bottoms BL. 2014. Give the kid a break—but only if he's straight: retributive motives drive biases against gay youth in ambiguous punishment contexts. Psychol. Public Policy Law 20:4398–410
     [Google Scholar]
110. Salerno JM, Najdowski C, Bottoms B, Harrington E, Kemner G, Dave R 2015. Excusing murder? Conservative jurors’ acceptance of the gay-panic defense. Psychol. Public Policy Law 21:24–34
     [Google Scholar]
111. Salerno JM, Peter-Hagene LC. 2013. The interactive effect of anger and disgust on moral outrage and judgments. Psychol. Sci. 24:102069–78
     [Google Scholar]
112. Salerno JM, Peter-Hagene LC. 2015. One angry woman: Anger expression increases influence for men, but decreases influence for women, during group deliberation. Law Hum. Behav. 39:6581–92
     [Google Scholar]
113. Salerno JM, Peter-Hagene LC, Jay ACV 2019. Women and African Americans are less influential when they express anger during group decision making. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 22:157–79
     [Google Scholar]
114. Salerno JM, Phalen HJ. 2019a. The impact of gruesome photographs on mock jurors’ emotional responses and decision making in a civil case. DePaul Law Rev. 69:633–56
     [Google Scholar]
115. Salerno JM, Phalen HJ. 2019b. Traditional gender roles and backlash against female attorneys expressing anger in court. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 16:4909–32
     [Google Scholar]
116. Salerno JM, Phalen HJ, Reyes RN, Schweitzer NJ. 2018. Closing with emotion: the differential impact of male versus female attorneys expressing anger in court. Law Hum. Behav. 42:4385–401
     [Google Scholar]
117. Salerno JM, Sanchez J. 2020. Subjective interpretation of “objective” video evidence: perceptions of male versus female police officers’ use-of-force. Law Hum. Behav. 44:297–112
     [Google Scholar]
118. Sayfan L, Mitchell EB, Goodman GS, Eisen ML, Qin J. 2008. Children's expressed emotions when disclosing maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl 32:111026–36
     [Google Scholar]
119. Schein C, Ritter RS, Gray K. 2016. Harm mediates the disgust-immorality link. Emotion 16:6862–76
     [Google Scholar]
120. Schnall S, Haidt J, Clore GL, Jordan AH. 2008. Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34:81096–109
     [Google Scholar]
121. Schwarz N, Clore G. 1983. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 45:513–23
     [Google Scholar]
122. Schweitzer K, Nuñez N. 2018. What evidence matters to jurors? The prevalence and importance of different homicide trial evidence to mock jurors. Psychiatry Psychol. Law 25:3437–51
     [Google Scholar]
123. Semmler C, Brewer N. 2002. Effects of mood and emotion on juror processing and judgments. Behav. Sci. Law. 20:4423–36
     [Google Scholar]
124. Shuman DW, Hamilton JA, Daley CE. 1994. The health effects of jury service. Law Psychol. Rev. 18:267–307
     [Google Scholar]
125. Simon D, Stenstrom D, Read S. 2015. The coherence effect: blending cold and hot cognitions. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 109:3369–94
     [Google Scholar]
126. Sinaceur M, Van Kleef GA, Neale MA, Adam H, Haag C 2011. Hot or cold: Is communicating anger or threats more effective in negotiation?. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:51018–32
     [Google Scholar]
127. Slovic P. 2010. The Feeling of Risk: New Perspectives on Risk Perception Abingdon, UK: Routledge
128. Smith C, Ellsworth P. 1985. Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 48:813–38
     [Google Scholar]
129. Spackman MP, Belcher JC, Calapp JW, Taylor A. 2002a. An analysis of the effects of subjective and objective instruction forms on mock-juries’ murder/manslaughter distinctions. Law Hum. Behav. 26:6605–23
     [Google Scholar]
130. Spackman MP, Belcher JC, Hansen AS. 2002b. Effects of perceived emotional intensity on mock jurors’ murder/manslaughter distinctions. J. Appl. Biobehav. Res. 7:287–113
     [Google Scholar]
131. Sundby SE. 1998. The capital jury and absolution: the intersection of trial strategy, remorse, and the death penalty. Cornell Law Rev 83:1557–98
     [Google Scholar]
132. Tallon JA, Daftary-Kapur T, Penrod S 2015. Defendant remorse and publicity in capital trials: Is seeing truly believing?. Crim. Justice Behav. 42:121282–302
     [Google Scholar]
133. Tiedens LZ, Linton S. 2001. Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol 81:973–88
     [Google Scholar]
134. Tsoudis O, Smith-Lovin L. 1998. How bad was it? The effects of victim and perpetrator emotion on responses to criminal court vignettes. Soc. Forces 77:695–722
     [Google Scholar]
135. Van Damme I, Smets K. 2014. The power of emotion versus the power of suggestion: memory for emotional events in the misinformation paradigm. Emotion 14:2310–20
     [Google Scholar]
136. van Doorn J, Koster NN. 2019. Emotional victims and the impact on credibility: a systematic review. Aggress. Violent Behav. 47:74–89
     [Google Scholar]
137. Van Kleef GA. 2009. How emotions regulate social life: the Emotions as Social Information (EASI) model. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 18:3184–88
     [Google Scholar]
138. Van Kleef GA, Van Doorn EA, Heerdink MW, Koning LF. 2011. Emotion is for influence. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol 22:1114–63
     [Google Scholar]
139. Ward BH. 2006. Sentencing without remorse. Loyola Univ. Chicago Law J. 38:131–67
     [Google Scholar]
140. Warner LR, Shields SA. 2009. Judgements of others’ emotional appropriateness are multidimensional. Cogn. Emot. 23:876–88
     [Google Scholar]
141. Wegner DM. 2009. How to think, say, or do precisely the worst thing for any occasion. Science 325:48–50
     [Google Scholar]
142. Wessel E, Drevland GCB, Eilertsen DE, Magnussen S. 2006. Credibility of the emotional witness: a study of ratings by court judges. Law Hum. Behav. 30:2221–30
     [Google Scholar]
143. Wessel EM, Bollingmo GC, Sønsteby C, Nielsen LM, Eliersten DE, Magnussen S. 2012. The emotional witness effect: story content, emotional valence and credibility of a male suspect. Psychol. Crime Law 18:5417–30
     [Google Scholar]
144. Whalen DH, Blanchard FA. 1982. Effects of photographic evidence on mock juror judgment. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol 12:30–41
     [Google Scholar]
145. Wheatley T, Haidt J. 2005. Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychol. Sci. 16:10780–84
     [Google Scholar]
146. Yzerbyt V, Dumont M, Wigboldus D, Gordijn E. 2003. I feel for us: the impact of categorization and identification on emotions and action tendencies. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 42:4533–49
     [Google Scholar]
147. Zhong R. 2014. So you're sorry? The role of remorse in criminal law. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 42:39–48
     [Google Scholar]