Legal Dualism as a Framework for Analyzing the Role of Law under Authoritarianism

Literature Cited

1. al-Fattah N 1999. The anarchy of Egyptian legal system: wearing away the legal and political modernity. Legal Pluralism in the Arab World B Dupret, M Berger, L al-Zwaini 159–72 The Hague, Neth: Kluwer Law Int.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bækken H. 2019. Law and Power in Russia: Making Sense of Quasi-Legal Practices New York: Routledge
3. Balasubramaniam R. 2008. Has rule by law killed the rule of law in Malaysia?. Oxford Univ. Common Law J. 8:211–36
   [Google Scholar]
4. Balasubramaniam R. 2009. Judicial politics in authoritarian regimes. Univ. Tor. Law J. 9:405–15
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barros R. 2008. Courts out of context: authoritarian sources of judicial failure in Chile (1973–1990) and Argentina (1976–1983). See Ginsburg & Moustafa 2008 156–79
6. Berman H. 1963. Justice in the U.S.S.R.: An Interpretation of Soviet Law Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
7. Bugaric B. 2015. A crisis of constitutional democracy in post-communist Europe: lands in-between democracy and authoritarianism. Int. J. Const. Law 13:219–34
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cheesman N. 2014. Law and order as asymmetrial opposite to the rule of law. Hague J. Rule Law 6:96–114
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cheesman N. 2015. Opposing the Rule of Law Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
10. Chen W, Fu H, eds. 2020a. Authoritarian Legality in Asia: Formation, Development and Transition Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
11. Chen W, Fu H. 2020b. Authoritarian legality, the rule of law, and democracy. See Chen & Fu 2020a 1–13
12. Clarke D. 2020. Order and law in China Res. Pap. 2020-52 GWU Law School Public Law Legal Theory, George Washington Univ. Washington, DC: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3682794
13. Dawisha K. 2014. Putin's Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia? New York: Simon & Schuster
14. deLisle J. 2020. Authoritarian legality in East Asia: What, why, and whither?. See Chen & Fu 2020a 17–58
15. Ezzat A 2021. Law, exceptional courts and revolution in modern Egypt. Routledge Handbook on Contemporary Egypt R Springborg, A Adly, A Gorman, T Moustafa, A Saad, N Sakr, S Smierciak 296–308 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fallon RH Jr. 1997.. “ The rule of law” as a concept in constitutional discourse. Columbia Law Rev. 97:1–56
    [Google Scholar]
17. Feifer G. 1964. Justice in Moscow New York: Simon & Schuster
18. Firestone T. 2009. Armed injustice: abuse of the law and complex crime in post-Soviet Russia. Denver J. Int. Law Policy 38:555–80
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fraenkel E. 2017 (1941. The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship transl. E Shils New York: Oxford Univ. Press (from German)
20. Fu H. 2019. Duality and China's struggle for legal autonomy. China Perspect 1:3–9
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fu H, Dowdle M. 2020. The concept of authoritarian legality: the Chinese case. See Chen & Fu 2020a 63–89
22. Fuller L. 1964. The Morality of Law New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
23. Gallagher M. 2017. Authoritarian Legality in China: Law, Workers, and the State Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
24. Gessen M. 2014. Words Will Break Cement: The Passion of Pussy Riot New York: Riverhead Books
25. Ginsburg T, Moustafa T, eds. 2008. Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
26. Glasius M. 2018. What authoritarianism is…and is not: a practice perspective. Int. Aff. 94:515–33
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hale H. 2015. Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
28. He X. 2009. Routinization of divorce law practice in China: institutional constraints’ influence on judicial behavior. Int. J. Law Policy Fam. 23:83–109
    [Google Scholar]
29. He X. 2020. (Non)legality as governmentality in China Res. Pap. 2020.035 Fac. Law, Univ. Hong Kong http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3612483
    [Crossref]
30. Hendley K. 1996. Trying to Make Law Matter: Legal Reform and Labor Law in the Soviet Union Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
31. Hendley K. 2009.. “ Telephone law” and the “rule of law”: the Russian case. Hague J. Rule Law 1:241–64
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hendley K. 2011. Varieties of legal dualism: making sense of the role of law in contemporary Russia. Wis. Int. Law J. 29:233–59
    [Google Scholar]
33. Hendley K. 2015. Resisting multiple narratives of law in transition countries: Russia and beyond. Law Soc. Inq. 40:531–52
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hendley K. 2017. Everyday Law in Russia Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
35. Hilbink L. 2008. Agents of anti-politics: courts in Pinochet's Chile. See Ginsburg & Moustafa 2008 102–31
36. Jayasuriya K. 1999. The rule of law and governance in the East Asian state. Aust. J. Asian Law 1:107–23
    [Google Scholar]
37. Jayasuriya K. 2001. The exception becomes the norm: law and regimes of exception in East Asia. Asia Pac. Law Rev. 2:108–24
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kaminskaya D. 1982. Final Judgment: My Life as a Soviet Defense Attorney transl. M Glenny New York: Simon & Schuster (from Russian)
39. Kleinfeld R 2006. Competing definitions of the rule of law. Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge T Carothers 31–73 Washington, DC: Carnegie Endow. Int. Peace
    [Google Scholar]
40. Knoops G, Amsterdam R. 2006. The duality of state cooperation within international and national criminal cases. Fordham Int. Law J. 30:260–95
    [Google Scholar]
41. Krygier M 2011. Four puzzles about the rule of law: Why, what, where?. And who cares? Getting to the Rule of Law J Fleming 64–104 New York: NYU Press
    [Google Scholar]
42. Krygier M 2021. Illiberalism and the rule of law. Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism A Sajó, R Uitz, S Holmes 533–53 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
43. Kyselova T. 2014. Dualism of Ukrainian commercial courts: exploratory study. Hague J. Rule Law 6:178–201
    [Google Scholar]
44. Labedz L, Hayward M, eds. 1967. On Trial London: Collins, Harvill Publ.
45. Landau D. 2013. Abusive constitutionalism. UC Davis Law Rev 47:189–260
    [Google Scholar]
46. Ledeneva A. 2013. Can Russia Modernise? Sistema, Power Networks and Informal Governance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
47. Lei Y. 2017. The Contentious Public Sphere: Law, Media, and Authoritarian Rule in China Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
48. Liebman B. 2013. Malpractice mobs: medical dispute resolution in China. Columbia Law Rev 113:181–264
    [Google Scholar]
49. Liebman B. 2014. Legal reform: China's law-stability paradox. Daedelus 143:96–109
    [Google Scholar]
50. Liebman B. 2015. Leniency in Chinese criminal law: everyday justice in Henan. Berkeley J. Int. Law 33:153–222
    [Google Scholar]
51. Liebman B. 2020. Ordinary tort litigation in China: Law versus practical justice?. J. Tort Law 13:197–228
    [Google Scholar]
52. Liu D. 2019. Punish the dissidents: the selective implementation of stability preservation in China. J. Contemp. China 28:795–812
    [Google Scholar]
53. Liu S. 2020. Cage for the birds: on the social transformation of Chinese law, 1999–2019. China Law Soc. Rev. 5:66–87
    [Google Scholar]
54. Liu S, Halliday T. 2016. Criminal Defense in China: The Politics of Lawyers at Work Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
55. Marar A. 2004. Saudi Arabia: the duality of the legal system and the challenges of adapting law to market economies. Arab Law Q 19:91–124
    [Google Scholar]
56. Markovits I. 2007. The death of socialist law?. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3:233–53
    [Google Scholar]
57. Markus S 2015. Property, Predation, and Protection: Piranha Capitalism in Russia and Ukraine Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
58. Massoud M. 2014. Law's Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian, and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
59. McCann M, Kahraman F. 2021. On the interdependence of liberal and illiberal/authoritarian legal forms in racial capitalist regimes…the case of the United States. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 17:483–503
    [Google Scholar]
60. McDonald T. 2011. Face to the Village: The Riazan Countryside under Soviet Rule, 1921–1930 Toronto, Can: Univ. Tor. Press
61. Meierhenrich J. 2008. The Legacies of Law: Long-Run Consequences of Legal Development in South Africa, 1652–2000 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
62. Meierhenrich J. 2018. The Remnants of the Rechtsstaat: An Ethnography of Nazi Law Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
63. Michelson E. 2019. Decoupling: marital violence and the struggle to divorce in China. Am. J. Sociol. 125:325–81
    [Google Scholar]
64. Minzner C. 2011. China's turn against law. Am. J. Comp. Law 59:935–84
    [Google Scholar]
65. Moliterno J, Berdisová L, Čuroš P, Mazúr J. 2018. Independence without accountability: the harmful consequences of EU policy toward Central and East European entrants. Fordham Int. Law J. 42:481–551
    [Google Scholar]
66. Moore B. 1966. Terror and Progress USSR: Some Sources of Change and Stability in the Soviet Dictatorship New York: Harper & Row
67. Moustafa T. 2007. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
68. Moustafa T. 2014. Law and courts in authoritarian regimes. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 10:281–99
    [Google Scholar]
69. Ng K, He X. 2017. Embedded Courts: Judicial Decision-Making in China Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
70. Nguyen T. 2019. In search of judicial legitimacy: criminal sentencing in Vietnamese courts. Harvard Hum. Rights J. 32:147–88
    [Google Scholar]
71. Nguyen T. 2020. Law and precariousness in an authoritarian state: the case of illegal house construction in Vietnam. Law & Policy 42:186–203
    [Google Scholar]
72. Nonet P, Selznick P. 2001. Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law New Brunswick, NJ: Trans. Publ., 2nd ed..
73. Peerenboom R 2004. Varieties of rule of law: an introduction and provisional conclusion. Asian Discourses of Rule of Law: Theories and Implementation of Rule of Law in Twelve Asian Countries, France and the U.S. R Peerenboom 1–55 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
74. Pils E. 2015. China's Human Rights Lawyers: Advocacy and Resistance New York: Routledge
75. Pils E. 2020. Rule-of-law reform and the rise of rule by fear in China. See Chen & Fu 2020a 90–113
76. Pils E n.d.. China's Dual State Revival Unpublished manuscript
77. Pomerantsev P. 2014. Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible: The Surreal Heart of the New Russia New York: Public Aff.
78. Popova M. 2017. Putin-style ‘rule of law’ & the prospects for change. Daedalus 146:64–75
    [Google Scholar]
79. Rajah J. 2011. Punishing bodies, securing the nation: how rule of law can legitimate the urbane authoritarian state. Law Soc. Inq. 36:945–70
    [Google Scholar]
80. Rajah J. 2012. Authoritarian Rule of Law: Legislation, Discourse and Legitimacy in Singapore Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
81. Rand R. 1991. Comrade Lawyer: Inside Soviet Justice in an Era of Reform Boulder, CO: Westview
82. Romanova O. 2011. Butyrka: Tiuremnaya Tetrad. Moscow: Astrel
83. Sajó A. 2021. Ruling by Cheating Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
84. Sajó A, Tuovinen J. 2019. The rule of law and legitimacy in emerging illiberal democracies. Osteur. Recht 64:506–29
    [Google Scholar]
85. Sakwa R. 2010. The dual state in Russia. Post-Sov. Aff. 26:185–206
    [Google Scholar]
86. Scheppele K 2017. Constitutional coups in EU law. Rule of Law: Bridging Idealism and Realism M Adams, A Meuwese, E Ballin 446–78 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
87. Schmitt C. 2005 (1922). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty transl. G Schwab Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press (from German)
88. Sharlet R 1977. Stalinism and Soviet legal culture. Stalinism: Essays in Historical Interpretation R Tucker 155–79 New York: W.W. Norton
    [Google Scholar]
89. Shelley L 1987. The structure and function of Soviet courts. The Distinctiveness of Soviet Law F Feldbrugge 199–216 Dordrecht, Neth: Martinus Nijhoff
    [Google Scholar]
90. Sidel M. 2008. Law and Society in Vietnam: The Transition from Socialism in Comparative Perspective Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
91. Skapska G 2018. The decline of liberal constitutionalism in East Central Europe. The Routledge International Handbook of European Social Transformations P Vihalemm, A Masso, S Opermann 130–45 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
92. Smith G. 1996. Reforming the Russian Legal System Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
93. Tamanaha B. 2004a. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
94. Tamanaha B. 2004b. Rule of law in the United States. Asian Discourses of Rule of Law: Theories and Implementation of Rule of Law in Twelve Asian Countries, France and the U.S. R Peerenboom 56–78 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
95. Tan K. 2020. Is Singapore an authoritarian constitutional regime? So what if it is?. See Chen & Fu 2020a 187–201
96. Thio L. 2002. Lex rex or rex lex? Competing conceptions of the rule of law in Singapore. UCLA Pac. Basin Law J. 20:1–76
    [Google Scholar]
97. Toharia J. 1975. Judicial independence in an authoritarian regime: the case of contemporary Spain. Law Soc. Rev. 9:475–96
    [Google Scholar]
98. Trochev A, Solomon P. 2018. Authoritarian constitutionalism in Putin's Russia: a pragmatic constitutional court in a dual state. Communist Post-Communist Stud 51:201–14
    [Google Scholar]
99. Tushnet M 2014. Authoritarian constitutionalism: some conceptual issues. Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes T Ginsburgand, A Simpser 36–49 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
100. Tushnet M. 2015. Authoritarian constitutionalism. Cornell Law Rev 100:391–462
     [Google Scholar]
101. Tushnet M. 2017. The possibility of illiberal constitutionalism. Fla. Law Rev. 69:1367–84
     [Google Scholar]
102. Upham F 2006. Mythmaking in rule-of-law orthodoxy. Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge T Carothers 75–104 Washington, DC: Carnegie Endow. Int. Peace
     [Google Scholar]
103. van der Vet F. 2018.. “ When they come for you”: legal mobilization in new authoritarian Russia. Law Soc. Rev. 52:301–36
     [Google Scholar]
104. Varol O. 2015. Stealth authoritarianism.. Iowa Law Rev 100:1673–742
     [Google Scholar]
105. Waldron J. 2002. Is the rule of law and essentially contested concept (in Florida)?. Law Philos 21:137–64
     [Google Scholar]
106. Wang J, Liu S. 2019. Ordering power under the party: a relational approach to law and politics in China. Asian J. Law Soc. 6:1–18
     [Google Scholar]
107. Wang Y. 2015. Tying the Autocrat's Hands Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
108. Yakovlev A, Sobolev A, Kazun A. 2013. Means of production versus means of coercion: Can Russian business limit the violence of a predatory state?. Post-Sov. Aff. 30:171–94
     [Google Scholar]
109. Xu J. 2020. The role of corporate political connections in commercial lawsuits: evidence from Chinese courts. Comp. Polit. Stud. 53:2321–58
     [Google Scholar]
110. Zhang T, Ginsburg T. 2019. China's turn toward law. Va. J. Int. Law 59:306–89
     [Google Scholar]