Layers of Political Repression: Integrating Research on Social Movement Repression

Literature Cited

1. Aksoy D, Carter DB, Wright J 2012. Terrorism in dictatorships. J. Politics 74:810–26
   [Google Scholar]
2. Almeida PD. 2008. Waves of Protest: Popular Struggle in El Salvador, 1925–2005 Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
3. Armstrong DA, Davenport C, Stam A. 2020. Casualty estimates in the Rwandan genocide. J. Genocide Res. 22:104–11
   [Google Scholar]
4. Balbus ID. 1973. The Dialectics of Legal Repression: Black Rebels Before the American Criminal Courts New York: Russell Sage Found.
5. Barclay S, Jones LC, Marshall A-M. 2011. Two spinning wheels: studying law and social movements. Stud. Law Politics Soc. 54:1–16
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barkan S. 2006. Criminal prosecution and the legal control of protest. Mobilization 11:181–94
   [Google Scholar]
7. Barkan SE. 1984. Legal control of the Southern civil rights movement. Am. Sociol. Rev. 49:552–65
   [Google Scholar]
8. Beckett K, Francis MM. 2020. The origins of mass incarceration: the racial politics of crime and punishment in the post–civil rights era. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 16:433–52
   [Google Scholar]
9. Beyer JL, Earl J. 2018. Backfire online: studying reactions to the repression of Internet activism. The Paradox of Repression and Nonviolent Movements LR Kurtz, LA Smithey 102–42 Syracuse, NY: Syracuse Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bhasin T, Gandhi J. 2013. Timing and targeting of state repression in authoritarian elections. Elect. Stud. 32:620–31
    [Google Scholar]
11. Birnir JK, Laitin DD, Wilkenfeld J, Waguespack DM, Hultquist AS, Gurr TR. 2018. Introducing the AMAR (All Minorities at Risk) data. J. Confl. Resolut. 62:203–26
    [Google Scholar]
12. Birnir JK, Wilkenfeld J, Fearon JD, Laitin DD, Gurr TR et al. 2015. Socially relevant ethnic groups, ethnic structure, and AMAR. J. Peace Res. 52:110–15
    [Google Scholar]
13. Boudreau V. 2005. Precarious regimes and matchup problems in the explanation of repressive policy. See Davenport et al. 2005 33–57
14. Boykoff J. 2007. Limiting dissent: the mechanisms of state repression in the USA. Soc. Mov. Stud. 6:281–310
    [Google Scholar]
15. Boyle MJ. 2010. Do counterterrorism and counterinsurgency go together?. Int. Aff. 86:333–53
    [Google Scholar]
16. Braithwaite A, Braithwaite JM. 2020. Restricting opposition in elections and terrorist violence. Terror. Political Violence 32:1550–72
    [Google Scholar]
17. Brancati D. 2014. Democratic authoritarianism: origins and effects. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 17:313–26
    [Google Scholar]
18. Brinks DM, Gauri V, Shen K. 2015. Social rights constitutionalism: negotiating the tension between the universal and the particular. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 11:289–308
    [Google Scholar]
19. Buhaug H, Cederman L-E, Rød JK. 2008. Disaggregating ethno-nationalist civil wars: a dyadic test of exclusion theory. Int. Organ. 62:531–51
    [Google Scholar]
20. Carey SC, Colaresi MP, Mitchell NJ. 2015. Governments, informal links to militias, and accountability. J. Confl. Resolut. 59:850–76
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cheibub JA, Hays JC. 2017. Elections and civil war in Africa. Political Sci. Res. Methods 5:81–102
    [Google Scholar]
22. Chenoweth E, Perkoski E, Kang S. 2017. State repression and nonviolent resistance. J. Confl. Resolut. 61:1950–69
    [Google Scholar]
23. Chenoweth E, Stephan MJ. 2011. Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict New York: Columbia Univ. Press
24. Choudhry S. 2010. After the rights revolution: bills of rights in the postconflict state. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 6:301–22
    [Google Scholar]
25. Christie B. 2017. AZ Senate OKs racketeering charges for riots. AZ Central Feb. 23. https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2017/02/23/arizona-senate-oks-racketeering-charges-riots/98296298/
    [Google Scholar]
26. Chua LJ. 2015. The vernacular mobilization of human rights in Myanmar's sexual orientation and gender identity movement. Law Soc. Rev. 49:299–332
    [Google Scholar]
27. Chua LJ. 2019. Legal mobilization and authoritarianism. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 15:355–76
    [Google Scholar]
28. Cingranelli DL, Richards DL. 1999. Measuring the level, pattern, and sequence of government respect for physical integrity rights. Int. Stud. Q. 43:407–17
    [Google Scholar]
29. Cingranelli DL, Richards DL, Clay KC. 2014. The CIRI Human Rights Dataset, Version 2014.04.14 https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UKCPXT
    [Crossref]
30. Conrad CR, Hill DW, Moore WH. 2018. Torture and the limits of democratic institutions. J. Peace Res. 55:3–17
    [Google Scholar]
31. Conrad CR, Moore WH. 2010. What stops the torture?. Am. J. Political Sci. 54:459–76
    [Google Scholar]
32. Conrad CR, Ritter EH. 2013. Treaties, tenure, and torture: the conflicting domestic effects of international law. J. Politics 75:397–409
    [Google Scholar]
33. Conrad CR, Ritter EH. 2019. Contentious Compliance: Dissent and Repression under International Human Rights Law New York: Oxford Univ. Press
34. Coppedge M, Gerring J, Knutsen CH, Lindberg SI, Teorell J et al. 2021. V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset Version 11.1 Gothenberg, Swed: V-Dem Inst.
35. Cunningham D. 2004. There's Something Happening Here: The New Left, the Klan, and FBI Counterintelligence Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
36. Davenport C. 1995. Multi-dimensional threat perception and state repression: an inquiry into why states apply negative sanctions. Am. J. Political Sci. 39:683–713
    [Google Scholar]
37. Davenport C. 1996.. “ Constitutional promises” and repressive reality: a cross-national time-series investigation of why political and civil liberties are suppressed. J. Politics 58:627–54
    [Google Scholar]
38. Davenport C. 1997. From ballots to bullets: an empirical assessment of how national elections influence state uses of political repression. Elect. Stud. 16:517–40
    [Google Scholar]
39. Davenport C. 2005. Repression and mobilization: insights from political science and sociology. See Davenport et al. 2005 vii–xlii
40. Davenport C. 2007a. State repression and political order. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 10:1–23
    [Google Scholar]
41. Davenport C. 2007b. State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
42. Davenport C, Armstrong DA. 2004. Democracy and the violation of human rights: a statistical analysis from 1976–1996. Am. J. Political Sci. 48:538–54
    [Google Scholar]
43. Davenport C, Johnston H, Mueller C, eds. 2005. Repression and Mobilization Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
44. della Porta D, Fillieule O 2004. Policing social protest. The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements DA Snow, SA Soule, H Kriesi 217–41 Oxford: Blackwell Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
45. della Porta D, Reiter H 1998. The policing of protest in western democracies. Policing Protest: The Control of Mass Demonstrations in Western Democracies D della Porta, H Reiter 1–32 Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
    [Google Scholar]
46. DiBlasi L. 2020. From shame to new name: how naming and shaming creates pro-government militias. Int. Stud. Q. 64:906–18
    [Google Scholar]
47. Dobbin F, Simmons B, Garrett G. 2007. The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning?. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 33:449–72
    [Google Scholar]
48. Downes AB. 2007. Draining the sea by filling the graves: investigating the effectiveness of indiscriminate violence as a counterinsurgency strategy. Civ. Wars 9:420–44
    [Google Scholar]
49. Earl J. 2003. Tanks, tear gas and taxes: toward a theory of movement repression. Sociol. Theory 21:44–68
    [Google Scholar]
50. Earl J. 2004. Controlling protest: new directions for research on the social control of protest. Res. Soc. Mov. Confl. Change 25:55–83
    [Google Scholar]
51. Earl J. 2005. You can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride. Res. Soc. Mov. Confl. Change 26:101–39
    [Google Scholar]
52. Earl J. 2011a. Political repression: iron fists, velvet gloves, and diffuse control. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 37:261–84
    [Google Scholar]
53. Earl J. 2011b. Protest arrests and future protest participation: the 2004 Republican National Convention arrestees and the effects of repression. Stud. Law Politics Soc. 45:141–73
    [Google Scholar]
54. Earl J. 2012. Private protest? Public and private engagement online. Inf. Commun. Soc. 15:591–608
    [Google Scholar]
55. Earl J, Beyer JL. 2014. The dynamics of backlash online: Anonymous and the battle for WikiLeaks. Res. Soc. Mov. Confl. Change 37:207–33
    [Google Scholar]
56. Earl J, Maher TV, Pan J. 2022. The digital repression of social movements, protests, and activism: a synthetic review. Sci. Adv. 8:abl8198
    [Google Scholar]
57. Earl J, Soule SA 2006. Seeing blue: a police-centered explanation of protest policing. Mobilization 11:145–64
    [Google Scholar]
58. Elliott T, Earl J, Maher TV, Reynolds-Stenson H. 2022. Softer policing or the institutionalization of protest? Decomposing changes in observed protest policing over time. Am. J. Sociol. 127:1311–65
    [Google Scholar]
59. Escribà-Folch A. 2013. Repression, political threats, and survival under autocracy. Int. Political Sci. Rev. 34:543–60
    [Google Scholar]
60. Faber G, Gerritse M. 2017. Does institutional change spread across countries? Explaining spatial patterns in human rights. World Econ. 40:906–30
    [Google Scholar]
61. Fariss CJ. 2014. Respect for human rights has improved over time: modeling the changing standard of accountability. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 108:297–318
    [Google Scholar]
62. Fariss CJ, Dancy G. 2017. Measuring the impact of human rights: conceptual and methodological debates. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 13:273–94
    [Google Scholar]
63. Fein H. 1995. More murder in the middle—life-integrity violations and democracy in the world, 1987. Hum. Rights Q. 17:170–91
    [Google Scholar]
64. Feldstein S. 2021. The Rise of Digital Repression: How Technology Is Reshaping Power, Politics, and Resistance Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
65. Ferree MM. 2005. Soft repression: ridicule, stigma, and silencing in gender-based movements. See Davenport et al. 2005 138–55
66. Foucault M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison New York: Vintage Books
67. Fox J. 2000. Religious causes of discrimination against ethno-religious minorities. Int. Stud. Q. 44:423–50
    [Google Scholar]
68. Francisco RA. 2004. After the massacre: mobilization in the wake of harsh repression. Mobilization 9:107–26
    [Google Scholar]
69. Frantz E, Kendall-Taylor A. 2014. A dictator's toolkit: understanding how co-optation affects repression in autocracies. J. Peace Res. 51:332–46
    [Google Scholar]
70. Fuchs C. 2013. Societal and ideological impacts of deep packet inspection internet surveillance. Inf. Commun. Soc. 16:1328–59
    [Google Scholar]
71. Gaventa J. 1980. Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley Chicago: Univ. Ill. Press
72. Geddes B, Zaller J. 1989. Sources of popular support for authoritarian regimes. Am. J. Political Sci. 33:319–47
    [Google Scholar]
73. Gibney M, Cornett L, Wood R, Haschke P, Arnon D et al. 2020. The Political Terror Scale 1976–2019 http://www.politicalterrorscale.org
74. Gleditsch KS, Polo SMT. 2016. Ethnic inclusion, democracy, and terrorism. Public Choice 169:207–29
    [Google Scholar]
75. Gohdes AR. 2020. Repression technology: Internet accessibility and state violence. Am. J. Political Sci. 64:488–503
    [Google Scholar]
76. Goodwin J, Jasper JM. 1999. Caught in a winding, snarling vine: the structural bias of political process theory. Sociol. Forum 14:27–54
    [Google Scholar]
77. Gurr TR. 2000. Peoples Versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century Washington, DC: US Inst. Peace Press
78. Hafner-Burton EM. 2005. Trading human rights: how preferential trade agreements influence government repression. Int. Organ. 59:593–629
    [Google Scholar]
79. Hafner-Burton EM. 2008. Sticks and stones: naming and shaming the human rights enforcement problem. Int. Organ. 62:689–716
    [Google Scholar]
80. Hafner-Burton EM. 2012. International regimes for human rights. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 15:265–86
    [Google Scholar]
81. Hafner-Burton EM. 2014. A social science of human rights. J. Peace Res. 51:273–86
    [Google Scholar]
82. Hafner-Burton EM, Tsutsui K. 2005. Human rights in a globalizing world: the paradox of empty promises. Am. J. Sociol. 110:1373–411
    [Google Scholar]
83. Hagan J, Schoenfeld H, Palloni A. 2006. The science of human rights, war crimes, and humanitarian emergencies. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 32:329–49
    [Google Scholar]
84. Harrelson-Stephens J, Callaway R. 2003. Does trade openness promote security rights in developing countries? Examining the liberal perspective. Int. Interact. 29:143–58
    [Google Scholar]
85. Hathaway O. 2002. Do human rights treaties make a difference?. Yale Law J. 111:1935–2042
    [Google Scholar]
86. Henderson CW. 1991. Conditions affecting the use of political repression. J. Confl. Resolut. 35:120–42
    [Google Scholar]
87. Henderson CW. 2004. The political repression of women. Hum. Rights. Q. 26:1028–49
    [Google Scholar]
88. Hess D, Martin B 2006. Backfire, repression, and the theory of transformative events. Mobilization 11:249–67
    [Google Scholar]
89. Hill DWJ. 2010. Estimating the effects of human rights treaties on state behavior. J. Politics 72:1161–74
    [Google Scholar]
90. Hu M. 2017. From the national surveillance state to the cybersurveillance state. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 13:161–80
    [Google Scholar]
91. Johnston H, Oliver PE. 2020. Pacification and Resistance in Racialized States: A Comparative View Abingdon, UK: Routledge
92. Johnston H, Zhang SX 2020. Repertoires of protest and repression in contemporary China. Mobilization 25:601–22
    [Google Scholar]
93. Keith LC. 1999. The United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Does it make a difference in human rights behavior?. J. Peace Res. 36:95–118
    [Google Scholar]
94. Keith LC. 2011. Political Repression: Courts and the Law Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
95. Kienscherf M. 2016. Beyond militarization and repression: liberal social control as pacification. Crit. Sociol. 42:1179–94
    [Google Scholar]
96. King G, Pan J, Roberts M. 2013. How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 107:326–43
    [Google Scholar]
97. Klug H. 2005. Transnational human rights: exploring the persistence and globalization of human rights. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 1:85–103
    [Google Scholar]
98. Knox JH. 2020. Constructing the human right to a healthy environment. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 16:79–95
    [Google Scholar]
99. Koopmans R. 1997. The dynamics of repression and mobilization: the German extreme right in the 1990s. Mobilization 2:149–65
    [Google Scholar]
100. Kriesi H 2004. Political context and opportunity. The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements DA Snow, SA Soule, H Kriesi 67–90 Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Kriesi H, Koopmans R, Duyvendak JW, Giugni MG. 1995. New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
102. Kydd AH, Walter BF. 2006. The strategies of terrorism. Int. Secur. 31:49–80
     [Google Scholar]
103. Langford M. 2018. Critiques of human rights. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 14:69–89
     [Google Scholar]
104. Lindemann S, Wimmer A. 2018. Repression and refuge: why only some politically excluded ethnic groups rebel. J. Peace Res. 55:305–19
     [Google Scholar]
105. Liu S, Halliday TC. 2016. Criminal Defense in China: The Politics of Lawyers at Work Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
106. Loveman M. 1998. High-risk collective action: defending human rights in Chile, Uruguay, and Argentina. Am. J. Sociol. 104:477–525
     [Google Scholar]
107. Lupu Y. 2013. Best evidence: the role of information in domestic judicial enforcement of international human rights agreements. Int. Organ. 67:469–503
     [Google Scholar]
108. Lupu Y. 2015. Legislative veto players and the effects of international human rights agreements. Am. J. Political Sci. 59:578–94
     [Google Scholar]
109. Lupu Y, Wallace GPR. 2019. Violence, nonviolence, and the effects of international human rights law. Am. J. Political Sci. 63:411–26
     [Google Scholar]
110. Manza J, Uggen C. 2006. Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy New York: Oxford Univ. Press
111. Marshall A-M. 2003. Injustice frames, legality, and the everyday construction of sexual harassment. Law Soc. Inq. 28:659–89
     [Google Scholar]
112. Marshall A-M. 2005. Idle rights: employees’ rights consciousness and the construction of sexual harassment policies. Law. Soc. Rev. 39:83–123
     [Google Scholar]
113. Marshall MG, Gurr TR. 2020. Polity5: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2018 Vienna, VA: Cent. Syst. Peace
114. Martin B, Gray T, Lendon H, Wright S 2007. Justice Ignited: The Dynamics of Backfire Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
115. Marx GT. 1979. External efforts to damage or facilitate social movements: some patterns, explanations, outcomes, and complications. Dynamics of Social Movements: Resource Mobilization, Social Control and Tactics M Zald, JD McCarthy 94–125 Cambridge, MA: Winthrop
     [Google Scholar]
116. Marx GT, Muschert GW. 2007. Personal information, borders, and the new surveillance studies. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3:375–95
     [Google Scholar]
117. McAdam D. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
118. McAdam D. 1983. Tactical innovation and the pace of insurgency. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:735–54
     [Google Scholar]
119. McCammon HJ, Muse CS, Newman HD, Terrell TM. 2007. Movement framing and discursive opportunity structures: the political successes of the U.S. women's jury movements. Am. Sociol. Rev. 72:725–49
     [Google Scholar]
120. Miller ME. 2021. Google takes down maps made by Thai right-wingers targeting free speech activists. Washington Post June 29. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/06/29/thailand-king-google-maps-doxing/
     [Google Scholar]
121. Mitchell NJ, Carey SC, Butler CK. 2014. The impact of pro-government militias on human rights violations. Int. Interact. 40:812–36
     [Google Scholar]
122. Mnookin RH, Kornhauser L. 1979. Bargaining in the shadow of the law: the case of divorce. Yale J. Law 88:950–97
     [Google Scholar]
123. Møller J, Skaaning S-E 2013. Autocracies, democracies, and the violation of civil liberties. Democratization 20:82–106
     [Google Scholar]
124. Moore WE. 1998. Repression and dissent: substitution, context, and timing. Am. J. Police Sci. 42:851–73
     [Google Scholar]
125. Moore WH. 2000. The repression of dissent: a substitution model of government coercion. J. Confl. Resolut. 44:107–27
     [Google Scholar]
126. Morris AD. 1999. A retrospective on the civil rights movement: political and intellectual landmarks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 25:517–39
     [Google Scholar]
127. Moss DM. 2021. The Arab Uprisings Abroad Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
128. Moyn S. 2012. Substance, scale, and salience: the recent historiography of human rights. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 8:123–40
     [Google Scholar]
129. Murdie A. 2014. Help or Harm: The Human Security Effects of International NGOs Redwood City, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
130. Murdie AM, Davis DR. 2012. Shaming and blaming: using events data to assess the impact of human rights INGOs. Int. Stud. Q. 56:1–16
     [Google Scholar]
131. Nobles M. 2010. The prosecution of human rights violations. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 13:165–82
     [Google Scholar]
132. Oliver PE. 2008. Repression and crime control: why social movement scholars should pay attention to mass incarceration as a form of repression. Mobilization 13:1–24
     [Google Scholar]
133. Oliver PE. 2013. Ethnicity, repression, and fields of action in movement mobilization. The Future of Social Movement Research: Dynamics, Mechanisms, and Processes J van Stekelenburg, C Roggeband, B Klandermans Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
     [Google Scholar]
134. Oliver PE. 2017. The ethnic dimensions in social movements. Mobilization 22:395–416
     [Google Scholar]
135. Ong LH. 2018.. “ Thugs-for-hire”: subcontracting of state coercion and state capacity in China. Perspect. Politics 16:680–95
     [Google Scholar]
136. Ortiz D. 2007. Confronting oppression with violence: inequality, military infrastructure and dissident repression. Mobilization 12:219–38
     [Google Scholar]
137. Ortiz D. 2013. Rocks, bottles, and weak autocracies: the role of political regime settings on contention-repression interactions. Mobilization 18:289–312
     [Google Scholar]
138. Pedahzur A, Ranstorp M. 2001. A tertiary model for countering terrorism in liberal democracies: the case of Israel. Terror. Political Violence 13:1–26
     [Google Scholar]
139. Powell EJ, Staton JK. 2009. Domestic judicial institutions and human rights treaty violation. Int. Stud. Q. 53:149–74
     [Google Scholar]
140. Rafail P, Soule SA, McCarthy JD. 2012. Describing and accounting for the trends in US protest policing, 1960−1995. J. Confl. Resolut. 56:736–65
     [Google Scholar]
141. Reyes DV, Ragon K. 2018. Analyzing ethnoracial mobilization. Sociol. Compass 12:e12629
     [Google Scholar]
142. Reynolds-Stenson H. 2018. Protesting the police: anti-police brutality claims as a predictor of police repression of protest. Soc. Mov. Stud. 17:48–63
     [Google Scholar]
143. Reynolds-Stenson H. 2022. Cultures of Resistance: Collective Action and Rationality in the Anti-Terror Age New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
144. Reynolds-Stenson H, Earl J. 2022. The puzzle of protest policing over time: historicizing repression research using temporal moving regressions. Am. Behav. Sci. 66:625–47
     [Google Scholar]
145. Rineheart J. 2010. Counterterrorism and counterinsurgency. Perspect. Terror. 4:31–47
     [Google Scholar]
146. Ritter EH. 2014. Policy disputes, political survival, and the onset and severity of state repression. J. Confl. Resolut. 58:143–68
     [Google Scholar]
147. Roscigno V, Cantzler J, Restifo S, Guetzkow J 2015. Legitimation, state repression, and the Sioux massacre at Wounded Knee. Mobilization 20:17–40
     [Google Scholar]
148. Sarat A, Scheingold SA. 1998. Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities New York: Oxford Univ. Press
149. Shu C. 2015. Reddit replaces its confusing Shadowban system with account suspensions. TechCrunch Nov. 11. https://techcrunch.com/2015/11/11/reddit-account-suspensions/
     [Google Scholar]
150. Sievert JM. 2018. The case for courts: resolving information problems in authoritarian regimes. J. Peace Res. 55:774–86
     [Google Scholar]
151. Sikkink K, Kim HJ. 2013. The justice cascade: the origins and effectiveness of prosecutions of human rights violations. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 9:269–85
     [Google Scholar]
152. Sikkink K, Walling CB. 2007. The impact of human rights trials in Latin America. J. Peace Res. 44:427–45
     [Google Scholar]
153. Simmons B. 2010. Treaty compliance and violation. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 13:273–96
     [Google Scholar]
154. Smidt H, Perera D, Mitchell NJ, Bakke KM. 2021. Silencing their critics: how government restrictions against civil society affect international “naming and shaming. .” Br. J. Political Sci. 51:1270–91
     [Google Scholar]
155. Somers MR, Roberts CNJ. 2008. Toward a new sociology of rights: a genealogy of “buried bodies” of citizenship and human rights. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 4:385–425
     [Google Scholar]
156. Soule SA, Davenport C. 2009. Velvet glove, iron fist or even hand? Protest policing in the United States, 1960–1990. Mobilization 14:1–22
     [Google Scholar]
157. Sullivan MJ. 1995. Development and political repression: China's human rights policy since 1989. Bull. Concern. Asian Sch. 27:24–39
     [Google Scholar]
158. Sutton J, Butcher CR, Svensson I. 2014. Explaining political jiu-jitsu: institution-building and the outcomes of regime violence against unarmed protests. J. Peace Res. 51:559–73
     [Google Scholar]
159. Tilly C. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publ.
160. Tschantret J. 2020. Revolutionary homophobia: explaining state repression against sexual minorities. Br. J. Political Sci. 50:1459–80
     [Google Scholar]
161. Tsutsui K, Smith J 2018. Human Rights and social movements: from the boomerang pattern to a sandwich effect. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements DA Snow, SA Soule, H Kriesi, H McCammon 586–601 Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. , 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
162. Tsutsui K, Whitlinger C, Lim A. 2012. International human rights law and social movements: states’ resistance and civil society's insistence. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 8:367–96
     [Google Scholar]
163. Waldner D, Lust E 2018. Unwelcome change: coming to terms with democratic backsliding. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 21:93–113
     [Google Scholar]
164. Welch RM. 2017. National human rights institutions: domestic implementation of international human rights law. J. Hum. Rights 16:96–116
     [Google Scholar]
165. Wimmer A. 2002. Nationalist Exclusion and Ethnic Conflict: Shadows of Modernity Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
166. Wimmer A, Cederman L-E, Min B 2009. Ethnic politics and armed conflict: a configurational analysis of a new global data set. Am. Sociol. Rev. 74:316–37
     [Google Scholar]
167. Wood LJ. 2007. Breaking the wave: repression, identity, and Seattle tactics. Mobilization 12:377–88
     [Google Scholar]
168. Young JK. 2013. Repression, dissent, and the onset of civil war. Political Res. Q. 66:516–32
     [Google Scholar]
169. Zhao Y 2012. Understanding China's media system in a world historical context. Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World DC Hallin, P Mancini 143–76 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]