1932

Abstract

Despite a long history of reform efforts, college students remain vulnerable to sexual harassment and assault on campus. This article surveys that history from the 1970s to the present, including a flurry of enforcement activity under President Obama and a backlash and reversed course under Trump. Many of the systems—for example law, education, and public health—designed to ameliorate the epidemic of campus sexual assault have failed to do so. These failures have been particularly pronounced for victims who experience multiple intersecting inequalities. The resulting frustration with legal remedies through campus Title IX processes and the criminal and civil justice system has spurred a new interest in strategies to prevent sexual assault in the first place. Recent political developments, including the #MeToo movement, suggest a potential for democratic political accountability to make progress where legal reform efforts and campus prevention programming have thus far been unsuccessful.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031308
2019-10-13
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/15/1/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031308.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031308&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Alexander v. Yale 631 F.2d 173 (2d Cir 1980.
  2. Ali R. 2011. Dear Colleague Letter Guid., Off. Civ. Rights, US Dep. Educ. Washington, DC: Apr. 4. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201104.html
  3. Anderson M. 2016. Campus sexual assault adjudication and resistance to reform. Yale Law J 125:71940–2005
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [Google Scholar]
  5. Armstrong E, Gleckman-Krut M, Johnson L 2018. Silence, power, and inequality: an intersectional approach to sexual violence. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 44:99–122
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Armstrong EA, Hamilton L, Sweeney B 2006. Sexual assault on campus: a multilevel, integrative approach to party rape. Soc. Probl. 54:4483–99
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baker B. 2017. When campus sexual misconduct policies violate due process rights. Cornell J. Law Public Policy 26:3533–63
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Baker K. 2016. Here's the powerful letter the Stanford victim read to her attacker. Buzzfeed News June 3. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/katiejmbaker/heres-the-powerful-letter-the-stanford-victim-read-to-her-ra
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Baker K, Brake D, Cantalupo N 2017. Title IX and the preponderance of the evidence: a white paper White Pap., feministlawprofessors.com. http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Title-IX-Preponderance-White-Paper-signed-7.18.17-2.pdf
  10. Baker MR, Frazier PA, Greer C, Paulson JA, Howard K et al. 2016. Sexual victimization history predicts performance in college women. J. Couns. Psychol. 63:6685–92
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Barbara Lee Fam. Found 2018. Voters, candidates and #MeToo Memo, Barbara Lee Fam. Found. Cambridge, MA: https://www.barbaraleefoundation.org/research/voters-candidates-and-metoo/
  12. Bartholet E, Gertner N, Halley J, Gerson JS 2017. Fairness for all students under Title IX Sch. Art., Harvard Lib. Off. Sch. Comm., Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA: https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/33789434
  13. Bauer-Wolf J. 2018. The “confusing” case of UNC's Title IX violations. Inside Higher Ed June 27. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/06/27/unc-found-have-violated-title-ix-multiyear-investigation
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Belkin D. 2018. Colleges, buffeted by courts and Washington, navigate sexual assault. The Wall Street Journal Sept. 22. https://www.wsj.com/articles/colleges-buffeted-by-courts-washington-navigate-sexual-assault-1537614000
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Berry E, Nelson R, Nielsen L 2017. Rights on Trial: How Workplace Discrimination Law Perpetuates Inequality Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  16. Black N, Henry M, Lewis W, Morris L, Oppenheim A et al. 2017. Due process and the sex police White Pap., NCHERM Group Berwyn, PA: https://www.ncherm.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/TNG-Whitepaper-Final-Electronic-Version.pdf
  17. Bleeker T, Murnen SK. 2005. Fraternity membership, the display of degrading sexual images of women, and rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles 53:7487–93
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Boeringer SB. 1999. Associations of rape-supportive attitudes with fraternal and athletic participation. Violence Against Women 5:181–90
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Boswell AA, Spade JZ. 1996. Fraternities and collegiate rape culture: Why are some fraternities more dangerous places for women. Gend. Soc. 10:2133–47
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Breitenbecher K. 2000. Sexual assault on college campuses: Is an ounce of prevention enough. Appl. Prev. Psychol. 9:123–52
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Briere J, Jordan CE. 2004. Violence against women: outcome complexity and implications for assessment and treatment. J. Interpers. Violence 19:111252–76
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Bublick E. 2008. Tort suits filed by rape and sexual assault victims in civil courts: lessons for courts, classrooms and constituencies. SMU Law Rev 59:155–122
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Calif. Const. Cent 2016. What does California's experience with recall of judges teach us?. SCOCA Blog Dec. 27. http://scocablog.com/what-does-californias-experience-with-recall-of-judges-teach-us/
  24. Campbell R. 2005. What really happened? A validation study of rape survivors’ help-seeking experiences with the legal and medical systems. Violence Vict 20:55–68
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Campbell R. 2008. The psychological impact of rape victims. Am. Psychol. 63:8702–17
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Cantalupo N. 2011. Burying our heads in the sand: lack of knowledge, knowledge avoidance, and the persistent problem of campus peer sexual violence. Loyola Univ. Chicago Law J. 43:1205–66
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Cantalupo N. 2016. For the Title IX civil rights movement: congratulations and cautions. Yale Law J 125:281–303
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Cantalupo N. 2018. And even more of us are brave: intersectionality & sexual harassment of women students of color. Harvard J. Law Gend. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Cantor D, Fisher B, Chibnall S, Townsend R, Lee H et al. 2017. Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct Rep., Westat Rockville, MD: https://www.aau.edu/sites/default/files/AAU-Files/Key-Issues/Campus-Safety/AAU-Campus-Climate-Survey-FINAL-10-20-17.pdf
  30. Cassidy C. 2018. PAC targets politicians it says act against women's interest. US News and World Report Sept. 24. https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/california/articles/2018-09-24/stanford-professor-launches-pac-to-target-metoo-politicians
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Celis W. 1990. Date rape and a list at Brown. New York Times Nov. 18. https://www.nytimes.com/1990/11/18/us/date-rape-and-a-list-at-brown.html
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Coker AL, Bush H, Fisher B, Swan S, Williams C et al. 2016. Multi-college bystander intervention evaluation for violence prevention. Am. J. Prev. Med. 50:3295–302
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Coker AL, Cook-Craig PG, Williams CM, Fisher BS, Clear ER et al. 2011. Evaluation of Green Dot: an active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. Violence Against Women 17:6777–96
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Collins PH. 2017. On violence, intersectionality and transversal politics. Ethn. Racial Stud. 40:91460–73
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Corbin WR, Bernat JA, Calhoun KS, McNair LD, Seals KL 2001. The role of alcohol expectancies and alcohol consumption among sexually victimized and nonvictimized college women. J. Interpers. Violence 16:4297–311
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education 526 U.S 629 1999.
  37. DeGue S, Valle LA, Holt MK, Massetti GM, Matjasko JL, Tharp AT 2014. A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggress. Violent Behav. 19:4346–62
    [Google Scholar]
  38. DeSantis N. 2014. Education dept. names 55 institutions facing sex-assault allegations. Chronicles of Higher Education May 1. https://www.chronicle.com/blogs/ticker/education-dept-names-55-institutions-facing-sex-assault-investigations/76849
    [Google Scholar]
  39. DeSantis N. 2018. Education dept. stops providing details on resolved Title IX cases. Chronicles of Higher Education March 18. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Education-Dept-Stops/242831
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Diavolo L. 2019. Swarthmore college fraternities disbanded after student organizers held a multi-day frat house sit-in protest. Teen Vogue May 2. https://www.teenvogue.com/story/swarthmore-college-fraternities-disbanded-student-organizers-frat-house-sit-in-protest
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Dick K, dir. 2015. The Hunting Ground (documentary) Los Angeles, CA: Chain Camera Pict.
  42. Doe v. Allee 30 Cal.App.5th 1036 2019.
  43. Doe v. Baum 903 F.3d 575 2018.
  44. Dunn L. 2013. Addressing sexual violence in higher education: ensuring compliance with the Clery Act, Title IX and VAWA. Georgetown J. Gend. Law 15:563–84
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Edelman L. 2016. Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  46. Eisenberg ME, Lust K, Mathiason MA, Porta CM 2017. Sexual assault, sexual orientation, and reporting among college students. J. Interpers. Violence. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Ellsberg M, Arango DJ, Morton M, Gennari F, Kiplesund S et al. 2015. Prevention of violence against women and girls: What does the evidence say. Lancet 385:99771555–66
    [Google Scholar]
  48. England P, Shafer E, Fogarty A 2010. Hooking up and forming romantic relationships on today's college campuses. Mapping the Social Landscape: Readings in Sociology SJ Ferguson 559–72 New York: McGraw Hill. , 6th ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Fabiano PM, Perkins HW, Berkowitz A, Linkenbach J, Stark C 2003. Engaging men as social justice allies in ending violence against women: evidence for a social norms approach. J. Am. Coll. Health 52:3105–12
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Fedina L, Holmes JL, Backes BL 2018. Campus sexual assault: a systematic review of prevalence research from 2000 to 2015. Trauma Violence Abuse 19:176–93
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Fisher BS, Cullen FT, Turner MG 2000. The sexual victimization of college women Res. Rep., Natl. Inst. Justice, US Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
  52. Fisher BS, Daigle LE, Cullen FT, Turner MG 2003. Reporting sexual victimization to the police and others: results from a national-level study of college women. Crim. Justice Behav. 30:16–38
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Flanagan C. 2014. The dark power of fraternities. The Atlantic March. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/03/the-dark-power-of-fraternities/357580/
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Foubert J, Clark-Taylor A, Wall A 2019. Is campus rape primarily a serial or one-time problem? Evidence from a multicampus study. Violence Against Women In press. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219833820
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. Foubert J, Newberry JT, Tatum J 2007. Behavior differences seven months later: effects of a rape prevention program. NASPA J 44:4728–49 https://doi.org/10.2202/1949-6605.1866
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. Franklin v. Gwinnett County Schools 503 U.S 60 1992.
  57. Franklin CA. 2016. Sorority affiliation and sexual assault victimization: assessing vulnerability using path analysis. Violence Against Women 22:8895–922
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Frazee D, O'Brien S. 1989. Reforging Relationships: Intimacy Without Violence Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Rape Educ. Proj.
  59. Freedman EB. 2013. Redefining Rape: Sexual Violence in the Era of Suffrage and Segregation Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  60. Freedman EB. 2016. When feminists take on judges over rape. New York Times June 10. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/10/opinion/when-feminists-take-on-judges-over-rape.html
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District 524 U.S 274 1998.
  62. Gerson J, Suk J. 2016. The sex bureaucracy. Calif. Law Rev. 104:4881–948
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Gerson JS. 2019. Assessing Betsy DeVos's proposed rules on Title IX and sexual assault. New Yorker Feb. 1. https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/assessing-betsy-devos-proposed-rules-on-title-ix-and-sexual-assault
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Gertner N. 2016. Forum: complicated process. Yale Law J 125:442
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Gidycz CA, Koss MP. 1991. The effects of acquaintance rape on the female victim. Acquaintance Rape: The Hidden Crime270–382 New York: John Wiley & Sons
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Gidycz CA, Orchowski LM, Berkowitz AD 2011. Preventing sexual aggression among college men: an evaluation of a social norms and bystander intervention program. Violence Against Women 17:6720–42
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Grasgreen A. 2013. Enforcement for the enforcers. Inside Higher Education July 16. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/07/16/sexual-assault-activists-protest-level-federal-title-ix-enforcement
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Hacker H. 1992. Sexual assault policy under fire: Offenders could face expulsion for coercion. Stanford Daily Jan. 6
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Halley J. 2015. Trading the megaphone for the gavel in Title IX enforcement. Harvard Law Rev 128:4103–16
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Harned MS. 2005. Understanding women's labeling of unwanted sexual experiences with dating partners: a qualitative analysis. Violence Against Women 11:3374–413
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Harvard Law Rev. 2019. Recent election: California judge recalled for sentence in sexual assault case. Harvard Law Rev 132:1369–76
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Healy E. 1985. Documentary downs rape myth. Stanford Daily Nov. 21
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Heldman C, Ackerman AR, Breckenridge-Jackson I 2018. The New Campus Anti-Rape Movement Lanham, MD: Lexington Books
  74. Hirshman L. 2019. Reckoning: The Epic Battle Against Sexual Abuse and Harassment Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  75. Holland KJ, Cortina LM, Freyd JJ 2018. Compelled disclosure of college sexual assault. Am. Psychol. 73:3256–68
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Hollander JA. 2018. Women's self-defense and sexual assault resistance: the state of the field. Sociol. Compass 12:8e12597
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Huseman J, Waldman A. 2017. Trump administration quietly rolls back civil rights efforts across federal government. ProPublica June 15. https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-administration-rolls-back-civil-rights-efforts-federal-government
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Jessup-Anger J, Lopez E, Koss MP 2018. History of sexual violence in higher education. New Dir. Student Serv. 2018:1619–19
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Johnson AM. 2017. Title IX narratives, intersectionality, and male-biased conceptions of racism. Georgetown J. Law Mod. Crit. Race Perspect. 9:57–203
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Johnson K. 2018. This is the emotional letter the Baylor victim wrote about the man she says raped her. Fort-Worth Star Telegram Dec. 12. https://www.star-telegram.com/news/state/texas/article223009415.html
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Johnson KC, Taylor S. 2017. The Campus Rape Frenzy: The Attack on Due Process at America's Universities New York: Encounter Books
  82. Jones RP, Cox D, Griffin R, Najle M, Fisch-Friedman M, Vandermaas-Peeler A 2018. Partisanship trumps gender: sexual harassment, women candidates, access to contraception, and key issues in 2018 midterms PRRI Washington, DC: https://www.prri.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Partisanship-Trumps-Gender-B.pdf
  83. Jordan CE, Combs JL, Smith GT 2014. An exploration of sexual victimization and academic performance among college women. Trauma Violence Abuse 15:3191–200
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Jouriles EN, McDonald R, Rosenfield D, Levy N, Sargent K et al. 2016. TakeCARE, a video bystander program to help prevent sexual violence on college campuses: results of two randomized, controlled trials. Psychol. Violence 6:3410–20
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Joyce K. 2017. The takedown of Title IX. New York Times Dec. 5. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/05/magazine/the-takedown-of-title-ix.html
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Karjane HK, Fisher BS, Cullen FT 1999. Campus sexual assault: How America's institutions of higher education respond Final Rep., NIJ Grant No. 1999-WA-VX-0008, Educ. Dev. Cent., Inc. Newton, MA:
  87. Kent A. 1988. Date rape awareness growing. Stanford Daily Feb. 22
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Kent A. 1990. The silence of survivors. Stanford Daily Feb. 28
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Khan SR, Hirsch JS, Wambolt A, Mellins CA 2018. “I didn't want to be ‘that girl’”: the social risks of labeling, telling, and reporting sexual assault. Sociol. Sci. 5:432–60
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Kingkade T. 2014. Fewer than one-third of campus sexual assault cases result in expulsion. Huffington Post Sept. 29. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/29/campus-sexual-assault_n_5888742.html
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Kipnis L. 2017. Unwanted Advances: Sexual Paranoia Comes to Campus New York: Harper Collins
  92. Koss MP, Gidycz CA, Wisniewski N 1987. The scope of rape: incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 55:2162–70
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Krakauer J. 2015. Missoula: Rape and the Justice System in a College Town New York: Doubleday
  94. Krebs C. 2014. Measuring sexual victimization: On what fronts is the jury still out and do we need it to come in?. Trauma Violence Abuse 15:3170–80 https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014521028
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  95. Krebs CP, Lindquist CH, Warner TD, Fisher BS, Martin SL 2007. Campus sexual assault (CSA) study Final Rep., US Dep. Just. Washington, DC:
  96. Kreighbaum A. 2018. Sharp divide over Trump administration's Title IX overhaul. Inside Higher Education Nov. 19. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/11/19/devos-sexual-misconduct-rule-criticized-survivor-advocates
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Kriesel BW. 2017. Police and victims of sexual assault. Sexual Assault: The Victims, the Perpetrators, and the Criminal Justice System FP Reddington, BW Kriesel 399–428 Durham, NC: Carolina Acad. , 3rd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  98. [Google Scholar]
  99. Lhamon C. 2014. Questions and answers on Title IX and sexual violence Doc., US Dep. Educ. Washington, DC:
  100. Lisak D, Miller PM. 2002. Repeat rape and multiple offending among undetected rapists. Violence Vict 17:173–84
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Liu J, Klayman K. 2014. Op-Docs: Brown's “rape list,” revisited. New York Times Sept. 24. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/25/opinion/browns-rape-list-revisited.html
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Lloyd AB. 2017. There is no easy way to clean up Obama's Title IX mess. Weekly Standard May 9. https://www.weeklystandard.com/alice-b-lloyd/there-is-no-easy-way-to-clean-up-obamas-title-ix-mess
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Lombardi K. 2009. Campus sexual assault statistics don't add up. Center for Public Integrity March 26. https://publicintegrity.org/education/sexual-assault-on-campus/campus-sexual-assault-statistics-dont-add-up/
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Lombardi K. 2010. Continuing impact from center series: campus sexual assault. Center for Public Integrity April 7. https://publicintegrity.org/education/sexual-assault-on-campus/continuing-impact-from-center-series/
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Lonsway KA, Archambault J. 2012. The “justice gap” for sexual assault cases: future directions for research and reform. Violence Against Women 18:2145–68
    [Google Scholar]
  106. MacKinnon CA. 1979. Sexual Harassment of Working Women New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  107. MacKinnon CA. 1981. A rally against rape. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law81–88 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  108. MacKinnon CA. 1988. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  109. MacKinnon CA. 2016a. In their hands: restoring institutional liability for sexual harassment in education. Yale Law J 125:72038–105
    [Google Scholar]
  110. MacKinnon CA. 2016b. Rape redefined. Harvard Law Policy Rev 10:431–77
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Madigan L, Gamble NC. 1991. The Second Rape New York: Lexington Books
  112. Mallery C. 1989. One in four undergraduate women experience sexual coercion, according to campus survey. Stanford Daily May 16
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Mercury News Ed. Board, East Bay Times Ed. Board. 2018. Editorial: Persky recall demands voters make statement on sexual assault. Mercury News May 8. https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/05/08/editorial-persky-recall-demands-voters-make-a-sexual-assault-statement/
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Minow JC, Einolf CJ. 2009. Sorority participation and sexual assault risk. Violence Against Women 15:835–51
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Mohler-Kuo M, Dowdall GW, Koss MP, Wechsler H 2004. Correlates of rape while intoxicated in a national sample of college women. J. Stud. Alcohol 65:37–45
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Morgan R, Truman J. 2018. Criminal victimization, 2017 Bull., Bur. Justice Stat., US Dep. Justice Washington, DC: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv17.pdf
  117. Muehlenhard CL, Peterson ZD, Humphreys TP, Jozkowski KN 2017. Evaluating the one-in-five statistic: women's risk of sexual assault while in college. J. Sex Res. 54:4–5549–76
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Natl. Acad. Sci. Eng. Med 2018. Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press https://doi.org/10.17226/24994
    [Crossref]
  119. New J. 2014. Banning frats. Inside Higher Education Sept. 30. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/09/30/should-colleges-ban-fraternities-and-sororities
    [Google Scholar]
  120. O'Neal EN, Tellis K, Spohn C 2015. Prosecuting intimate partner sexual assault. Violence Against Women 21:101237–58
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Orchowski LM, Edwards KM, Hollander JA, Banyard VL, Senn CY, Gidycz CA 2018. Integrating sexual assault resistance, bystander, and men's social norms strategies to prevent sexual violence on college campuses: a call to action. Trauma Violence Abuse In press. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018789153
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  122. Orchowski LM, Untied AS, Gidycz CA 2013. Social reactions to disclosure of sexual victimization and adjustment among survivors of sexual assault. J. Interpers. Violence 28:102005–23
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Orso A. 2019. Before Swarthmore College banned fraternities there were years of complaints and an “open secret.”. Philadelphia Inquirer May 12
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Palo Alto Weekly Ed. Board. 2018. Editorial: Recall Judge Persky. Palo Alto Weekly May 11. https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2018/05/11/editorial-recall-judge-persky
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Pappas B. 2016. Dear colleague: Title IX coordinators and inconsistent compliance with the laws governing campus sexual misconduct. Tulsa Law Rev 52:1121–65
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Payne BK. 2008. Challenges responding to sexual violence: differences between college campuses and communities. J. Crim. Justice 36:3224–30
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Read B. 2018. Rape culture is on the ballot in California: inside the movement to recall Judge Aaron Persky. Vogue May 23. https://www.vogue.com/projects/13543901/brock-turner-judge-aaron-persky-recall-election-california/
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Ridolfi-Starr Z. 2016. Transformation requires transparency: critical policy reforms to advance campus sexual violence response. Yale Law J 125:72156–81
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Roiphe K. 1994. The Morning After: Sex, Fear, and Feminism New York: Little, Brown and Co.
  130. Rosenfeld D. 2015. Uncomfortable conversations: confronting the reality of target rape on campus. Harvard Law Rev 128:359–80
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Rosman K. 2018. The reinvention of consent. New York Times Feb. 24. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/24/style/antioch-college-sexual-offense-prevention-policy.html
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Rubenfeld J. 2014. Mishandling rape. New York Times Nov. 15
    [Google Scholar]
  133. Sabia JJ, Dills AK, DeSimone J 2013. Sexual violence against women and labor market outcomes. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:3274–78
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Sable MR, Danis F, Mauzy DL, Gallagher SK 2006. Barriers to reporting sexual assault for women and men: perspectives of college students. J. Am. Coll. Health 55:3157–62
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Salazar LF, Vivolo-Kantor A, Hardin J, Berkowitz A 2014. A web-based sexual violence bystander intervention for male college students: randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 16:9e203 https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3426
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  136. Santa Clara Cty. Regist. Voters 2018. June 5, 2018 Statewide Direct Primary Election: Official Final Results Santa Clara, CA: Santa Clara Cty. Regist. Voters http://results.enr.clarityelections.com/CA/Santa_Clara/75369/Web02.207763/#/c/C_2
  137. Senn CY. 2011. An imperfect feminist journey: reflections on the process to develop an effective sexual assault resistance programme for university women. Fem. Psychol. 21:1121–37
    [Google Scholar]
  138. Senn CY, Eliasziw M, Barata PC, Thurston WE, Newby-Clark IR et al. 2015. Efficacy of a sexual assault resistance program for university women. N. Engl. J. Med. 372:242326–35
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Senn CY, Eliasziw M, Hobden KL, Newby-Clark IR, Barata PC et al. 2017. Secondary and 2-year outcomes of a sexual assault resistance program for university women. Psychol. Women Q. 41:2147–62
    [Google Scholar]
  140. Shub D. 1992. Private attorneys general, prevailing parties, and public benefit: attorney's fees awards for civil rights plaintiffs. Duke Law J 42:706–26
    [Google Scholar]
  141. Shugerman JH. 2012. The People's Courts: Pursuing Independence in America Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  142. Sinozich S, Langton L. 2014. Rape and sexual assault victimization among college-age females, 1995–2013 Spec. Rep., Bur. Justice Stat., Off. Justice Programs, US Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
  143. Sleath E, Bull R. 2017. Police perceptions of rape victims and the impact on case decision making: a systematic review. Aggress. Violent Behav. 34:107–12
    [Google Scholar]
  144. Smidt AM, Rosenthal MN, Smith CP, Freyd JJ 2019. Out and in harm's way: sexual minority students’ psychological and physical health after institutional betrayal and sexual assault. J. Child Sex. Abuse 11:1–15
    [Google Scholar]
  145. Smith CP, Cunningham S, Freyd JJ 2016. Sexual violence, institutional betrayal, and psychological outcomes for LGB college students. Transl. Issues Soc. Sci. 2:351–60
    [Google Scholar]
  146. Smith CP, Freyd JJ. 2014. Institutional betrayal. Am. Psychol. 69:6575–87
    [Google Scholar]
  147. Smith CP, Freyd JJ. 2017. Insult, then injury: interpersonal and institutional betrayal linked to health and dissociation. J. Aggress. Maltreatment Trauma 26:1117–31
    [Google Scholar]
  148. Spohn C, Tellis K. 2012. The criminal justice system's response to sexual violence. Violence Against Women 18:2169–92
    [Google Scholar]
  149. Stanford Univ 1990. Final report of the task force on sexual assault Rep., Stanford Univ. Stanford, CA:
  150. Stoltenberg J. 1992. Let's make rape an election issue. Issues Magazine Fall https://www.ontheissuesmagazine.com/1992fall/fall1992b.php
    [Google Scholar]
  151. Swartout KM, Koss MP, White JW, Thompson MP, Abbey A, Bellis AL 2015. Trajectory analysis of the campus serial rapist assumption. JAMA Pediatr 169:121148–54
    [Google Scholar]
  152. Taylor K. 2017. Columbia settles with student cast as a rapist in mattress art project. New York Times July 14. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/14/nyregion/columbia-settles-with-student-cast-as-a-rapist-in-mattress-art-project.html
    [Google Scholar]
  153. Tetreault PA. 1989. Rape myth acceptance: a case for providing educational expert testimony in rape jury trials. Behav. Sci. Law 7:2243–57
    [Google Scholar]
  154. Tinkler JE, Clay-Warner J, Alinor M 2018. Communicating about affirmative consent: how the threat of punishment affects policy support and gender stereotypes. J. Interpers. Violence 33:213344–66
    [Google Scholar]
  155. Tolentino J. 2018. Is there a smarter way to think about sexual assault on campus. New Yorker Feb. 12. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/02/12/is-there-a-smarter-way-to-think-about-sexual-assault-on-campus
    [Google Scholar]
  156. Tracy CE, Fromson TL, Long GJ, Whitman C 2012. Rape and sexual assault in the legal system Presented to the National Research Council of the National Academies Panel on Measuring Rape and Sexual Assault in the Bureau of Justice Statistics Household Surveys Committee on National Statistics June 5. http://www.womenslawproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Rape-and-Sexual-Assault-in-the-Legal-System-FINAL.pdf
  157. US Dep. Educ 2001. Revised sexual harassment guidance: harassment of students by school employees, other students, or third parties: Title IX Off. Civ. Rights, US Dep. Ed. Washington, DC: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/shguide.pdf
  158. Venema RM. 2016. Police officer schema of sexual assault reports: real rape, ambiguous cases, and false reports. J. Interpers. Violence 31:5872–99
    [Google Scholar]
  159. Villasenor J. 2016. A probabilistic framework for modelling false Title IX “convictions” under the preponderance of the evidence standard. Law Probab. Risk 15:4223–37 https://academic.oup.com/lpr/article/15/4/223/2549058
    [Google Scholar]
  160. Vladutiu CJ, Martin SL, Macy RJ 2011. College- or university-based sexual assault prevention programs: a review of program outcomes, characteristics, and recommendations. Trauma Violence Abuse 12:267–86
    [Google Scholar]
  161. Wamboldt A, Khan SR, Mellins CA, Hirsch JS 2019. Friends, strangers, and bystanders: informal methods of sexual assault intervention. Glob. Public Health 14:153–64
    [Google Scholar]
  162. Warshaw R. 1988. I Never Called It Rape: The Ms. Report on Recognizing, Fighting, and Surviving Date and Acquaintance Rape New York: Harper Collins
  163. Weizel LM. 2012. The process that is due: preponderance of the evidence as the standard of proof for university adjudications of student-on-student sexual assault complaints. Boston Coll. Law Rev. 53:41613–55 https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol53/iss4/10
    [Google Scholar]
  164. White House Off. Press Secr 2017. Final It's On Us Summit and Report of the White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault Fact Sheet, Off. Press Secr. Washington, DC: Jan. 5. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/05/fact-sheet-final-its-us-summit-and-report-white-house-task-force-protect
  165. Wiersma-Mosley J, DiLoreto J. 2018. The role of Title IX coordinators on college and university campuses. Behav. Sci. 8:4E38 https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8040038
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  166. Williams JB. 2018. #MeToo and Public Officials: A Post-Election Snapshot of Allegations and Consequences Washington, DC: Georgetown Law
  167. Williams JE, Holmes KA. 1981. The Second Assault: Rape and Public Attitudes Westport, CT: Greenwood
  168. Wilson LC, Miller KE. 2016. Meta-analysis of the prevalence of unacknowledged rape. Trauma Violence Abuse 17:2149–59
    [Google Scholar]
  169. Wolcott RJ. 2018. Democrats Scott, Tebay win seats on MSU Board of Trustees. Lansing State Journal Nov. 7. https://www.lansingstatejournal.com/story/news/local/2018/11/07/msu-trustee-election-scott-tebay/1893390002/
    [Google Scholar]
  170. Yung CR. 2015. Concealing campus sexual assault: an empirical examination. Psychol. Public Policy Law 21:11–9
    [Google Scholar]
  171. Zamudio-Suaréz F. 2017. Civil-rights official apologizes for saying 90% of campus rape cases stem from regret. Chronicles of Higher Education July 12. https://www.chronicle.com/blogs/ticker/civil-rights-official-says-sexual-assault-policies-ignore-rights-of-the-accused/119310
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031308
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error