Legal Mobilization and Authoritarianism

Literature Cited

1. Abrego LJ. 2011. Legal consciousness of undocumented Latinos: fear and stigma as barriers to claims-making for first- and 1.5-generation immigrants. Law Soc. Rev. 45:2337–70
   [Google Scholar]
2. Adam EM. 2017. Intersectional coalitions: the paradoxes of rights-based movement building in LGBTQ and immigrant communities. Law Soc. Rev. 51:1132–67
   [Google Scholar]
3. Adam EM, Cooper BL. 2017. Equal rights versus special rights: rights discourses, framing, and lesbian and gay antidiscrimination policy in Washington State. Law Soc. Inq. 42:3830–54
   [Google Scholar]
4. Albiston CR. 2010. Institutional Inequality and the Mobilization of the Family and Medical Leave Act: Rights on Leave New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
5. Allen L. 2013. The Rise and Fall of Human Rights: Cynicism and Politics in Occupied Palestine Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
6. Andersen EA. 2005. Out of the Closets and into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
7. Andrews K, Jowers K. 2018. Lawyers and embedded legal activity in the southern civil rights movement. Law Policy 40:110–32
   [Google Scholar]
8. Arendt H. 1968. What is authority?. Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought91–142 New York: Viking
   [Google Scholar]
9. Armstrong EA, Bernstein M. 2008. Culture, power, and institutions: a multi-institutional politics approach to social movements. Sociol. Theory 26:74–99
   [Google Scholar]
10. Atuahene B. 2014. We Want What's Ours: Learning from South Africa's Land Restitution Program Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
11. Barkan SE. 1984. Legal control of the Southern civil rights movement. Am. Sociol. Rev. 49:4552–65
    [Google Scholar]
12. Barkan SE. 2006. Criminal prosecution and the legal control of protest. Mobilization 11:2181–94
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bernstein M, Marshall AM, Barclay S 2009. The challenge of law: sexual orientation, gender identity, and social movements. Queer Mobilizations: LGBT Activists Confront the Law S Barclay, M Bernstein, AM Marshall 1–20 New York: NYU Press
    [Google Scholar]
14. Black DJ. 1973. The mobilization of law. J. Legal Stud. 2:1125–49
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bogaards M. 2009. How to classify hybrid regimes? Defective democracy and electoral authoritarianism. Democratization 16:2399–423
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press (from French)
17. Brownlee J. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
18. Bumiller K. 1988. The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
19. Burstein P. 1991. Legal mobilization as a social movement tactic: the struggle for equal employment opportunity. Am. J. Sociol. 96:51201–25
    [Google Scholar]
20. Burstein P, Monaghan K. 1986. Equal employment opportunity and the mobilization of law. Law Soc. Rev. 20:3355–88
    [Google Scholar]
21. Calavita K, Jenness V. 2014. Appealing to Justice: Prisoner Grievances, Rights, and Carceral Logic Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
22. Cheesman N. 2015. Opposing the Rule of Law: How Myanmar's Courts Make Law and Order Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
23. Chen P, Gallagher M. 2018. Mobilization without movement: how the Chinese state “fixed” labor insurgency. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 71:1029–52
    [Google Scholar]
24. Chua LJ. 2012. Pragmatic resistance, law, and social movements in authoritarian states: the case of gay collective action in Singapore. Law Soc. Rev. 46:4713–48
    [Google Scholar]
25. Chua LJ. 2014. Mobilizing Gay Singapore: Rights and Resistance in an Authoritarian State Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
26. Chua LJ. 2015. The vernacular mobilization of human rights in Myanmar's sexual orientation and gender identity movement. Law Soc. Rev. 49:2299–332
    [Google Scholar]
27. Chua LJ. 2017. Collective litigation and the constitutional challenges to decriminalizing homosexuality in Singapore. J. Law Soc. 44:3433–55
    [Google Scholar]
28. Chua LJ. 2019. The Politics of Love in Myanmar: LGBT Mobilization and Human Rights as a Way of Life Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
29. Chua LJ, Hildebrandt T. 2014. From health crisis to rights advocacy? HIV/AIDS and gay activism in China and Singapore. VOLUNTAS 25:61583–605
    [Google Scholar]
30. Cichowski RA. 2016. The European court of human rights, amicus curiae, and violence against women. Law Soc. Rev. 50:4890–919
    [Google Scholar]
31. Collier JF. 1973. Law and Social Change in Zinacantan Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
32. Cummings SL, NeJaime D. 2010. Lawyering for marriage equality. UCLA Law Rev 57:1235–331
    [Google Scholar]
33. Currier A. 2009. Deferral of legal tactics: a global LGBT social movement organization's perspective. Queer Mobilizations: LGBT Activists Confront the Law S Barclay, M Bernstein, A Marshall 21–37 New York: NYU Press
    [Google Scholar]
34. Currier A. 2012. Out in Africa: LGBT Organizing in Namibia and South Africa Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
35. Dale JG. 2011. Free Burma: Transnational Legal Action and Corporate Accountability Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
36. Davenport C. 2005. Repression and mobilization: insights from political science and sociology. Repression and Mobilization C Davenport, C Mueller, H Johnston, pp. vii–xli Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
    [Google Scholar]
37. Diamant NJ. 2005. Hollow glory: the politics of rights and identity among PRC veterans in the 1950s and 1960s. Engaging the Law in China: State, Society and Possibilities for Justice NJ Diamant, SB Lubman, KJ O'Brien 131–60 Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
38. Diamond L. 2002. Thinking about hybrid regimes. J. Democr. 13:221–35
    [Google Scholar]
39. Digeser P. 1992. The fourth face of power. J. Politics 54:4977–1007
    [Google Scholar]
40. Earl J. 2005. Introduction: repression and the social control of protest. Mobilization 11:2129–43
    [Google Scholar]
41. Earl J. 2011. Political repression: iron fists, velvet gloves, and diffuse control. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 37:261–84
    [Google Scholar]
42. Edelman LB. 2016. Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights Chicago: Univ. Chic. Press
43. Edelman LB, Fuller SR, Mara-Drita I 2001. Diversity rhetoric and the managerialization of law. Am. J. Sociol. 106:61589–641
    [Google Scholar]
44. Englund H. 2006. Prisoners of Freedom: Human Rights and the African Poor Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
45. Ewick P, Silbey SS. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life Chicago: Univ. Chic. Press
46. Felstiner WLF, Abel R, Austin S 1980–1981. The emergence and transformation of disputes: naming, blaming, claiming. Law Soc. Rev. 15:3/4631–54
    [Google Scholar]
47. Ferree MM. 2003. Resonance and radicalism: feminist framing in the abortion debates of the United States and Germany. Am. J. Sociol. 109:2304–44
    [Google Scholar]
48. Fligstein N, McAdam D. 2011. Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociol. Theory 29:11–26
    [Google Scholar]
49. Foucault M. 1979. Discipline and Punish New York: Vintage Books
50. Fraenkel E. 1941. The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
51. Fritsvold ED. 2009. Under the law: legal consciousness and radical environmental activism. Law Soc. Inq. 34:4799–824
    [Google Scholar]
52. Galanter M. 1974. Why the “haves” come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change. Law Soc. Rev. 9:95–160
    [Google Scholar]
53. Gallagher ME. 2006. Mobilizing the law in China: “informed disenchantment” and the development of legal consciousness. Law Soc. Rev. 40:4783–816
    [Google Scholar]
54. Gallagher ME. 2017. Authoritarian Legality in China: Law, Workers, and the State Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
55. Garreton MA. 1995. Redemocratization in Chile. J. Democr. 6:1146–58
    [Google Scholar]
56. Gaventa J. 1982. Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley Chicago: Univ. Ill. Press
57. Gibson EL. 2005. Boundary control: subnational authoritarianism in democratic countries. World Politics 58:1101–32
    [Google Scholar]
58. Gleeson S. 2009. From rights to claims: the role of civil society in making rights real for vulnerable workers. Law Soc. Rev. 43:3669–700
    [Google Scholar]
59. Gleeson S. 2010. Labor rights for all? The role of undocumented immigrant status for worker claims making. Law Soc. Inq. 35:3561–602
    [Google Scholar]
60. Gobe E, Salaymeh L. 2016. Tunisia's “revolutionary” lawyers: from professional autonomy to political mobilization. Law Soc. Inq. 41:2311–45
    [Google Scholar]
61. Goldberg-Hiller J. 1996. The boycott of the law and the law of the boycott: law, labor, and politics in British Columbia. Law Soc. Inq. 21:2313–51
    [Google Scholar]
62. Goldberg-Hiller J, Milner N. 2003. Rights as excess: understanding the politics of special rights. Law Soc. Inq. 28:1075–118
    [Google Scholar]
63. Gramsci A. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks New York: Int. Publ.
64. Handler JF. 1978. Lawyers and the Pursuit of Legal Rights New York: Academic
65. Handler JF. 1992. Postmodernism, protest and the new social movements. Law Soc. Rev. 26:697–732
    [Google Scholar]
66. He X. 2014. Maintaining stability by law: protest-supported housing demolition litigation and social change in China. Law Soc. Inq. 39:4849–73
    [Google Scholar]
67. He X, Wang L, Su Y 2013. Above the roof, beneath the law: perceived justice behind disruptive tactics of migrant wage claimants in China. Law Soc. Rev. 47:4703–38
    [Google Scholar]
68. Hernández D. 2010. Special issue interdisciplinary legal studies: the next generation. Stud. Law Politics Soc. 51:95–121
    [Google Scholar]
69. Heyer K. 2015. Rights Enabled: The Disability Revolution, from the US, to Germany and Japan, to the United Nations Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
70. Hilbink E. 2007. The Politics of Judicial Apoliticism: Chile in Comparative Perspective Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
71. Holzer E. 2013. What happens to law in a refugee camp?. Law Soc. Rev. 47:4837–72
    [Google Scholar]
72. Holzmeyer C. 2009. Human rights in an era of neoliberal globalization: the Alien Tort Claims Act and grassroots mobilization in Doe v. Unocal. Law Soc. Rev 43:2271–304
    [Google Scholar]
73. Jacob H. 1969. Debtors in Court Chicago: Rand McNally
74. Johnston H. 2015. The game's afoot: social movements in authoritarian states. The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements DP Della, M Diani 619–33 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
75. Kahraman F. 2017. Claiming labor rights as human rights: legal mobilization at the European Court of Human Rights PhD thesis, Univ. Wash Seattle, WA:
76. Keck ME, Sikkink K. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
77. Kemp A, Kfir N. 2016. Mobilizing migrant workers’ rights in “non-immigration” countries: the politics of resonance and migrants’ rights activism in Israel and Singapore. Law Soc. Rev. 50:182–116
    [Google Scholar]
78. Kessler M. 1990. Legal mobilization for social reform: power and the politics of agenda setting. Law Soc. Rev. 24:1121–44
    [Google Scholar]
79. Lawrence SE. 1991. Participation through mobilization of the law: institutions providing indigents with access to the civil courts. Polity 23:3423–42
    [Google Scholar]
80. Leachman GM. 2014. From protest to Perry: how litigation shaped the LGBT movement's agenda. UC Davis Law Rev 47:1667–751
    [Google Scholar]
81. Lejeune A. 2017. Legal mobilization within the bureaucracy: disability rights and the implementation of antidiscrimination law in Sweden. Law Policy 39:3237–58
    [Google Scholar]
82. Lemaitre J, Sandvik KB. 2015. Shifting frames, vanishing resources, and dangerous political opportunities: legal mobilization among displaced women in Colombia. Law Soc. Rev. 49:15–38
    [Google Scholar]
83. Lempert RO. 1976. Mobilizing private law: an introductory essay. Law Soc. Rev. 11:2173–89
    [Google Scholar]
84. Levitsky S, Way LA. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: International Linkage, Organizational Power, and the Fate of Hybrid Regimes New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
85. Levitsky SR. 2015. Law and social movements. Handb. Law Soc. 2015:382–98
    [Google Scholar]
86. Levitt P, Merry S. 2009. Vernacularization on the ground: local uses of global women's rights in Peru, China, India and the United States. Glob. Netw. 9:4441–61
    [Google Scholar]
87. Liu S. 2015. Law's social forms: a powerless approach to the sociology of law. Law Soc. Inq. 40:11–28
    [Google Scholar]
88. Liu S. 2018. Book discussion—Nick Cheesman, Opposing the Rule of Law: How Myanmar's Courts Make Law and Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015): commentary by Sida Liu. Asian J. Law Soc 52485–98
    [Google Scholar]
89. Liu S, Halliday TC. 2017. Criminal Defense in China: The Politics of Lawyers at Work New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
90. Lovell GI. 2012a. The myth of the myth of rights. Stud. Law Politics Soc. 59:1–30
    [Google Scholar]
91. Lovell GI. 2012b. This Is Not Civil Rights: Discovering Rights Talk in 1939 America Chicago: Univ. Chic. Press
92. Lovell GI, McCann M, Taylor K 2016. Covering legal mobilization: a bottom-up analysis of Wards Cove v. Atonio. Law Soc. Inq 41:161–99
    [Google Scholar]
93. Lukes S. 1974. Power: A Radical View London: Macmillan
94. Marshall AM. 1998. Closing the gaps: plaintiffs in pivotal sexual harassment cases. Law Soc. Inq. 23:4761–93
    [Google Scholar]
95. Marshall AM. 2003. Injustice frames, legality, and the everyday construction of sexual harassment. Law Soc. Inq 28:3659–89
    [Google Scholar]
96. Marshall AM. 2005. Idle rights: employees’ rights consciousness and the construction of sexual harassment policies. Law Soc. Rev. 39:183–124
    [Google Scholar]
97. Massoud MF. 2015. Work rules: how international NGOs build law in war-torn societies. Law Soc. Rev. 49:2333–64
    [Google Scholar]
98. Mayhew LH. 1975. Institutions of representation: civil justice and the public. Law Soc. Rev. 9:3401–29
    [Google Scholar]
99. Mayhew L, Reiss AJ Jr 1969. The social organization of legal contacts. Am. Sociol. Rev. 34:3309–18
    [Google Scholar]
100. McCann MW. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization Chicago: Univ. Chic. Press
101. McCann MW. 2006. Law and social movements: contemporary perspectives. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 2:17–38
     [Google Scholar]
102. McCann MW, March T. 1996. Law and everyday forms of resistance: a socio-political assessment. Stud. Law Politics Soc 15:207–36
     [Google Scholar]
103. McElhattan D, Nielsen LB, Weinberg JD 2017. Race and determinations of discrimination: vigilance, cynicism, skepticism, and attitudes about legal mobilization in employment civil rights. Law Soc. Rev. 51:3669–703
     [Google Scholar]
104. Merry SE. 1995. Resistance and the cultural power of law. Law Soc. Rev. 29:11–26
     [Google Scholar]
105. Merry SE. 2003. Rights talk and the experience of law: implementing women's human rights to protection from violence. Hum. Rights Q. 25:2343–81
     [Google Scholar]
106. Merry SE. 2006. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice Chicago: Univ. Chic. Press
107. Michelson E. 2007a. Climbing the dispute pagoda: grievances and appeals to the official justice system in rural China. Am. Sociol. Rev. 72:3459–85
     [Google Scholar]
108. Michelson E. 2007b. Justice from above or below? Popular strategies for resolving grievances in rural China. China Q 193:43–64
     [Google Scholar]
109. Mickey R. 2015. Paths Out of Dixie: The Democratization of Authoritarian Enclaves in America's Deep South, 1944–1972 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
110. Migdal JS. 2004. State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
111. Miller RE, Sarat A. 1981. Grievances, claims, and disputes: assessing the adversary culture. Law Soc. Rev. 15:3–4525–66
     [Google Scholar]
112. Morgan PA. 1999. Risking relationships: understanding the litigation choices of sexually harassed women. Law Soc. Rev. 33:167–92
     [Google Scholar]
113. Morrill C, Tyson K, Edelman LB, Arum R 2010. Legal mobilization in schools: the paradox of rights and race among youth. Law Soc. Rev. 44:3–4651–93
     [Google Scholar]
114. Moustafa T. 2007. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
115. Moustafa T. 2014. Law and courts in authoritarian regimes. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 10:281–99
     [Google Scholar]
116. Moustafa T. 2018. Constituting Religion: Islam, Liberal Rights, and the Malaysian State New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
117. Munger F. 2014. Revolution imagined: cause advocacy, consumer rights, and the evolving role of NGOs in Thailand. Asian J. Comp. Law 9:129–64
     [Google Scholar]
118. Nader L. 1964. An analysis of Zapotec law cases. Ethnology 3:4404–19
     [Google Scholar]
119. Nader L, Metzger D. 1963. Conflict resolution in two Mexican communities. Am. Anthropol. 65:3584–92
     [Google Scholar]
120. Nader L, Todd HF Jr 1978. The Disputing Process: Law in Ten Societies New York: Columbia Univ. Press
121. Narrain A, Thiruvengadam AK. 2013. Social justice lawyering and the meaning of Indian constitutionalism: a case study of the alternative law forum. Wis. Int. Law J. 31:525–64
     [Google Scholar]
122. Nguyen TP. 2018. Labor law and (in)justice in workers’ letters in Vietnam. Asian J. Law Soc. 5:129–47
     [Google Scholar]
123. Nonet P, Selznick P. 1978. Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law New York: Harper & Row
124. O'Brien KJ, Li L. 2006. Rightful Resistance in Rural China New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
125. Olson SM. 1984. Clients and Lawyers: Securing the Rights of Disabled Persons Westport, CT: Greenwood
126. Osanloo A. 2006. Islamico-civil “rights talk”: women, subjectivity, and law in Iranian family court. Am. Ethnol. 33:2191–209
     [Google Scholar]
127. Ozgul C. 2017. Beyond legal victory or reform: the legal mobilization of religious groups in the European Court of Human Rights. Relig. State Soc. 45:3–4317–33
     [Google Scholar]
128. Polletta F. 2000. The structural context of novel rights claims: Southern civil rights organizing, 1961–1966. Law Soc. Rev. 34:2367–406
     [Google Scholar]
129. Quinn BA. 2000. The paradox of complaining: law, humor, and harassment in the everyday work world. Law Soc. Inq. 25:41151–85
     [Google Scholar]
130. Rajah J. 2012. Authoritarian Rule of Law: Legislation, Discourse and Legitimacy in Singapore New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
131. Rana A. 2010. The Two Faces of American Freedom Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
132. Revillard A. 2017. Social movements and the politics of bureaucratic rights enforcement: insights from the allocation of disability rights in France. Law Soc. Inq. 42:2450–78
     [Google Scholar]
133. Rodríguez-Garavito CA, Arenas LC. 2005. Indigenous rights, transnational activism, and legal mobilization: the struggle of the U'wa people in Colombia. Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality B de Sousa Santos, C Rodríguez-Garavito 241–66 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
134. Rosenberg GN. 2008 (1991). The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: Univ. Chic. Press
135. Sarat A, Scheingold SA. 2006. What cause lawyers do for, and to, social movements: an introduction. Cause Lawyers and Social Movements A Sarat, S Scheingold 1–36 Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
136. Scheingold SA. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
137. Scheppele KL. 2018. Autocratic legalism. Univ. Chic. Law Rev. 85:545–83
     [Google Scholar]
138. Scott JC. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Resistance New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
139. Scott JC. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
140. Selby DF. 2011. “Kat Mai Ploi”—bite and don't let go: motherhood and pursuits of justice in Thailand. Citizsh. Stud. 15:6–7711–33
     [Google Scholar]
141. Sezgin Y. 2013. Human Rights Under State-Enforced Religious Family Laws in Israel, Egypt, and India Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
142. Smith MR. 1997. Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
143. Speed S. 2008. Rights in Rebellion Indigenous Struggle and Human Rights in Chiapas Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
144. Steinman EW. 2005. Legitimizing American Indian sovereignty: mobilizing the constitutive power of law through institutional entrepreneurship. Law Soc. Rev. 39:4759–92
     [Google Scholar]
145. Stern RE. 2013. Environmental Litigation in China: A Study in Political Ambivalence Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
146. Su Y, He X. 2010. Street as courtroom: state accommodation of labor protest in South China. Law Soc. Rev. 44:1157–84
     [Google Scholar]
147. Tam W. 2013. Legal Mobilization under Authoritarianism: The Case of Post-Colonial Hong Kong New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
148. Thireau I, Hua L. 2005. One law, two interpretations: mobilizing the labor law in arbitration committees and in letters and visit offices. Engaging the Law in China: State, Society and Possibilities for Justice NJ Diamant, SB Lubman, KJ O'Brien 84–107 Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
149. Thompson EP. 1975. Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act New York: Pantheon Books
150. Tsutsui K. 2017. Human rights and minority activism in Japan: transformation of movement actorhood and local-global feedback loop. Am. J. Sociol. 122:41050–103
     [Google Scholar]
151. Tsutsui K, Shin HJ. 2008. Global norms, local activism, and social movement outcomes: global human rights and resident Koreans in Japan. Soc. Probl. 55:3391–418
     [Google Scholar]
152. Van der Vet F. 2018. “When they come for you”: legal mobilization in new authoritarian Russia. Law Soc. Rev. 52:2301–36
     [Google Scholar]
153. Varol OO. 2015. Stealth authoritarianism. Iowa Law Rev 100:1673–742
     [Google Scholar]
154. Wedeen L. 1999. Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria Chicago: Univ. Chic. Press
155. Wilson S. 2015. Tigers Without Teeth: The Pursuit of Justice in Contemporary China Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
156. Wilson S. 2017. Cause lawyering in revolutionary Ukraine. J. Law Courts 5:2267–88
     [Google Scholar]
157. Winn JK, Yeh T. 1995. Advocating democracy: the role of lawyers in Taiwan's political transformation. Law Soc. Inq. 20:2561–99
     [Google Scholar]
158. Woodward J. 2015. Making rights work: legal mobilization at the agency level. Law Soc. Rev. 49:3691–723
     [Google Scholar]
159. Zemans FK. 1983. Legal mobilization: the neglected role of the law in the political system. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 77:3690–703
     [Google Scholar]